A
“Behavioural Dynamics of Green Investing: An Exploratory Study of Investor Perceptions and Experiences”Bengaluru
Research Scholar,
Bengaluru
Ms.Suma B R1
S-VYASA Deemed to be University
School of Management and Commerce
Mail ID: sumaramamurthy@gmail.com,
Mob: 9845392714
Dr Shreelatha H R2,
Associate professor
S-VYASA Deemed to be University
School of Management and Commerce
Mail ID: dr.shreelathahr@svyasa.edu.in
Mob: 9448885661
ABSTRACT
The increasing visibility of green investing has made it a leading topic of investment discussion worldwide. This research investigates the behavioural dynamics that influence investor experience and perceptions, providing insights into the experiential and psychological drivers of green investment participation. The research applies Natural Language Processing (NLP) methodology to assess scholarly work in an organized manner and detect underlying themes, patterns, and lacunae. The thematic clustering in topic modelling analysis shows different thematic groups, such as market forces and financial returns, environmental goods and ethical engagement, sustainable values and trust, finance opportunities and risk beliefs, psychological and cognitive factors, greenwashing and institutional ambiguity, behavioural framing and decision organization, regulatory and structural dilemmas, and social and experiential dimensions. The text cluster analysis produces three unique clusters: theoretical and cognitive bases, behavioural dynamics and decision-making processes, and practical opportunities and market challenges. The thematic analysis identifies the complex interplay of cognitive frames, behavioural biases, structural contexts, and ethical values that shape investor behaviour in sustainable finance. The results indicate that decision-making goes beyond rational calculations of return and is influenced by perceptions of trust, risk, social identity, policy-driven influences, and market-driven influences. The research adds to the scholarly discussion by uncovering the multidimensionality of green investing literature and offers implications for practitioners, academics, and theory building. Directions for future research are empirical confirmation of thematic clusters, longitudinal research, research in emerging markets, and financial technology and artificial intelligence in sustainable investment decisions.
Keywords:
Green Investing
Investor Perceptions
Investor Experiences
Behavioural Dynamics
Sustainable Finance
Environmental Sustainability and Psychological Influences
A
A
A
INTODUCTION
The increasing dominance of sustainable finance has put green investing at the centre of international investment thinking. This research examines the behavioural dynamics influencing investor experience and perception, gaining insights into the psychological and experiential drivers behind participation in green investments.
Green investing is inextricably entangled with the nexus of financial choice-making and psychological determinants, where conventional economic rationality is frequently moulded by behavioural factors. The Theory of Planned Behaviour offers a convenient frame of reference, in that it focuses on how attitudes towards sustainability, social norms, and control perceptions all individually and collectively drive investment intention. Prospect Theory also highlights that investors' decisions are not necessarily objective but are influenced by risk perceptions, loss aversion, and whether green opportunities are framed as gains or losses. Together, these views identify that investors' interest in green finance is not only driven by quantifiable returns, but equally by how risks and gains are psychologically framed.
With this said, social and cognitive factors have considerable influence over shaping these inclinations. Social Identity Theory predicts that identification with green investments can strengthen environmentally aware groups to which one belongs, and Cognitive Dissonance Theory accounts for why investors might behave to alleviate the tension between pro-environmental attitudes and investment actions. Supplementary to these, understanding from Behavioural Finance Theory presents how herding and overconfidence biases operate to further motivate investment behaviours within sustainable markets. Taken as a whole, these theory bases supply a rich context for analysis of how perceptions, values, and cognitive processes affect investors' experiences in green investing.
In recent times, there has been an expanding interest in green investing due to heightened concerns for environmental sustainability, policy responses, and the heightened demand for responsible finance. Investors have been increasingly attracted to sustainable assets not only due to their returns potential but also because they align with individual values and long-term environmental aspirations (Friede, Busch, & Bassen, 2015). The trend comes with a number of challenges that make investment choices more complex. Among these is inconsistency in green investment definitions and the lack of a global set of uniformly agreed upon standards, creating confusion and patchy market practices (Flammer, 2021). In addition, the rampant "greenwashing," where companies overstate their environmental pledges, taints investor confidence and poses issues in making correct assessments of sustainable choices (Widyawati, 2020).
Along with definitional and credibility issues, behavioural and market-related issues also impact investor experiences. Most investors have problems balancing environmental incentives with conventional financial returns, particularly considering the perceived compromises between profitability in the short term and sustainability (Baker, Kumar, & Goyal, 2019). Low financial literacy about green products also limits participation, especially in developing economies where access to reliable information continues to act as a hindrance (Nair & Ladha, 2019). In addition, behavioural biases like risk aversion and herding would inspire or deter investment in green assets, determining market outcomes in unforeseeable manners (Shiller, 2015). They are all aspects that illustrate the intricate dynamic of structural, psychological, and market-level factors that continue to influence the development of green investing.
In spite of increasing visibility of green investing as a means to reconcile financial aims with ecological sustainability, strong gaps remain in comprehending the behavioural forces determining investor attitudes and experiences. Investors typically act not solely on the basis of financial aspects but also on psychological motivations, social identities, and cognitive heuristics, which render their decision-making processes more complex. In addition, issues of incoherent green investment definitions, greenwashing concerns, and low awareness of sustainable financial products lead to uncertainty and distrust, especially in emerging economies. These issues highlight the necessity of an exploratory study to examine how investors experience and perceive green investing and identify the behavioural drivers or barriers that facilitate or deter participation in sustainable finance.
The scope of this study is limited to investigating the behavioural patterns of green investing through a qualitative examination of investor experiences and perceptions. Concentrating only on the literature review and introduction sections, the study utilizes Natural Language Processing (NLP) strategies to critically evaluate available scholarly work and determine emergent themes, trends, and gaps. This limited focus makes it possible to have a more sophisticated grasp of the ways in which investor behaviour in green finance has been theorized and debated within existing literature. The value of the research is in its methodological contribution, as it combines qualitative research and computational analysis, providing richer insights into the developing discourse on sustainable investing. In so doing, the study not only contributes to academic knowledge but also offers a well-defined framework for future empirical research in green investing.
Green investing lies at the heart of global sustainability efforts, directly supporting the United Nations SDGs. This research particularly aligns well with SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) by indicating the role of investor behaviour in driving capital formation for renewable and low-carbon technologies. It contributes to SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) in areas where behavioural factors determine responsible financial decisions. The embedding of climate-related perceptions and trust in the study links to SDG 13 (Climate Action) by demonstrating how financial decisions can enable climate-mitigation programs. The paper reflects SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals) through its various discussions on regulatory frameworks, institutional trust, and market structures that facilitate sustainable investment. Situating green finance behaviour within the broader SDG framework cements its relevance to global sustainability pathways and aligns tightly with conference tracks on Green Finance and SDGs.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The theoretical foundations concerning the behavioural determinants influencing investors' views of green investing emphasized psychological biases, social norms, and subjective financial performance. Research indicated that investors were influenced by cognitive biases like overconfidence, herding, and risk perception when judging environmentally friendly investments (Baker et al., 2019). Social influence and peer influence also came into the picture, with investors copying their green investing decisions in accordance with mainstream cultural and societal norms (Nofsinger & Varma, 2014). Additionally, the green investing perceptions were influenced by the sacrificing of financial returns for ethical grounds, with studies indicating that investors would settle for lower returns if the investment happened to be consistent with their values (Riedl & Smeets, 2017).
Empirical data further showed that long-term orientation, trust towards corporate sustainability practices, and environmental awareness were powerful determinants of behaviour (Friede et al., 2015). There were studies that showed how framing effects, and the marketing of green financial products influenced investor decisions as positive environmental framing boosted investment willingness (Taufique & Vaithianathan, 2018). Moreover, differences in generations and demographics were noted to affect perceptions, such that younger and better-educated investors showed greater inclinations for sustainable investments (Bauer et al., 2021). Further, differences in gender identified that female investors were more oriented toward green investments because they had greater pro-social and environmental concerns (López-González et al., 2019). In general, the literature highlighted that investor green investing perceptions were not merely founded on rational financial assessments but were highly influenced by social, behavioural, and psychological considerations.
Suma (2024) highlights the central importance of the government in promoting green investment through the introduction of favourable policies, developing strong regulatory frameworks, and the use of market mechanisms like taxation and incentives to shift consumer behaviour and drive technological uptake. The research also highlights the need for well-defined and commonly accepted definitions of what makes "green" in financial activities, along with establishing knowledge and skills among important players such as companies, investors, intermediaries, and regulators to enhance sustainable development practice. Additionally, the research points out that attitudes of individuals, perceived control of behaviour, knowledge levels, reputation, and religious faith play an important role in influencing investment decisions, especially among Muslim investors.
Literature investigating investors' experiences with sustainable financial strategies highlighted both opportunities and challenges encountered in adopting these methods. Studies showed that investors often found themselves with competing between ethical purposes and expected financial returns, typically trading these priorities according to individual values and long-term perspectives (Sandberg et al., 2009). Research indicated that most investors felt sustainable finance as a means to have their portfolios reflect personal or societal priorities, creating a sense of identity and purpose (Berk & van Binsbergen, 2021). In addition, evidence revealed that desirable psychological outcomes, including satisfaction and perceived meaningfulness, were correlated with sustainable investing choices (Wins & Zwergel, 2016).
Empirical results also revealed that investors' experiences were influenced by transparent information availability and credible sustainability reporting, which reinforced trust and confidence in financial markets (Amel-Zadeh & Serafeim, 2018). Moreover, investor engagement practices like shareholder activism provided investors with a direct means to influence the environmental and social conduct of corporations themselves, thus underscoring their sustainability commitment (Dimson et al., 2015). The cultural context played an important role as well, as investors in respective regions registered diversified motivations and obstacles based on respective regulatory regimes and societal standards (Scholtens & Sievänen, 2013). Additionally, qualitative research demonstrated that certain investors felt doubt about greenwashing, which brought into question the genuineness of sustainable financial products (Bannier et al., 2019). In general, studies indicated that investors' experiences with sustainable finance were complex, intertwining financial choice with ethical considerations, faith in market processes, and self-construction.
The literature that discussed the challenges and opportunities driving participation in green investments captured a dynamic interplay between financial, regulatory, and behavioural drivers. Researchers suggested that among the most considerable challenges was a perceived trade-off between financial returns and sustainability objectives, as some investors continued to question the profitability of green assets (Revelli & Viviani, 2015). The other hindrance was continued information asymmetry, with scant transparency and variable sustainability reporting detracting from investor trust (Eccles et al., 2014). Fragmentation in markets and the absence of a set of comparable metrics to measure environmental performance only made investment more difficult (Kölbel et al., 2020). Regulatory ambiguity and policy changes were also said to lead to indecision on the part of institutional and retail investors both (Krueger et al., 2020).
Even with such impediments, participation possibilities in green investment were present. Evidence showed that policy rewards and global arrangements, including the Paris Agreement, facilitated higher flows to green financial instruments through eliminating uncertainty and raising legitimacy levels (Flammer, 2021). Additionally, the creation of green bonds and groundbreaking financial products saw investors being offered diversified channels to match financial objectives with sustainability promises (Zerbib, 2019). Research also found that enhanced environmental consciousness, combined with mounting pressure from socially responsible millennials and institutional investors, opened up market opportunities for green goods (Giglio et al., 2021). Improved strategies for integrating ESG factors also improved risk management and creation of long-term value, thus making green investments more attractive (Fatemi & Fooladi, 2013). In general, the literature indicated that though structural and behavioural constraints curbed participation, increasing regulatory structures, technological advancements, and changing investor attitudes provided immense opportunities for green investment growth.
Suma (2025) explored the perceptions of investors towards green bonds in Bangalore, providing interesting, localized evidence about how sustainable finance instruments are perceived in an emerging Indian market. The wider literature on Indian green bonds supports these findings by underscoring a number of dominant themes. Regulatory efforts, such as SEBI guidelines and sovereign issuances, have been instrumental in building market credibility, whereas controversy surrounding the "greenium" continues to expose pricing disparities. The market remains dominated by private sector issuances, notably among renewable energy and infrastructure projects. However, long-standing issues—like truncated liquidity, depressed levels of retail uptake, and the risk of greenwashing due to ambiguous categorizations and poor disclosures—hamper broader take-up. Academics have highlighted the need for standardized taxonomies, strong impact reporting, and the launch of diversified instruments such as sustainability-linked bonds to enhance investor confidence and mature the market. Against this background, Suma's research offers contextually relevant observations by locating investor behaviour in Bangalore's financial landscape, noting the concurrent significance of behavioural insights and institutional changes in facilitating green bond uptake in India.
In the midst of the speedy digitization of wealth management advice, Suma, Udupa, and Supriya (2025) offer an extensive review of how artificial intelligence is transforming the way wealth management is practiced. With a systematic literature review backed by Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods such as topic modelling (LDA) and sentiment analysis, the research reveals the strategic implications of embracing AI. Based on the theoretical foundations of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), Resource-Based View (RBV), and Behavioural Finance, the results underscore key drivers like perceived usefulness, organizational capability, and the ability of AI to reduce biases in investors. The literature also points out that effective incorporation calls for strategic alignment, readiness in the organization, and firm ethical governance. New strategies—like hybrid human–AI advisory frameworks, algorithmic decision-making transparency, and regulatory compliance—are cited as drivers to improve efficiency and deepen client trust. Finally, the study urges technological advancement to be balanced with ethical governance, and invites case-based and interdisciplinary inquiries for testing and expanding these theoretical propositions.
OBJECTIVES
1.
To analyse the behavioural influences on investor attitudes towards green investing.
2.
To examine the experiences of investors who are practicing sustainable financial behaviour.
3.
To define the challenges and opportunities that define participation in green investments.
DISCUSSION
Topic analysis:
Topic modelling analysis identifies a heterogeneous set of thematic clusters that reflect the multifaceted nature of green investing and investor behaviour research. A cluster focuses on market conditions and financial performance, stressing the way investment choices are generally determined by how assets align with projected returns and behavioural influences. The second prominent theme focuses on environmental products and ethical engagement, whereby the literature analyses how investors make assessment of sustainable alternatives based on empirical and qualitative findings. A closely related theme is one on sustainable values and trust, as it implies that decision-making is not only rational but also highly associated with moral values, compromises, and perceived credibility of being sustainable.
The analysis also shows a high emphasis on finance opportunities and risk perceptions, indicating concern regarding the supply of trustworthy information, risk management, and the functioning of green financial practices. Another cluster highlights psychological and cognitive aspects, where investigations examine the way perceptions, biases, and heuristics strongly influence investor behaviour. The ongoing theme of greenwashing and institutional ambiguity also arises, highlighting the absence of standard definitions and firm behaviour that tend to create investor distrust. Furthermore, behavioural framing and decision structure themes indicate that framing effects, herding, and subjective expectations are important in influencing green investment decisions.
Yet another thread of themes concerns regulatory and structural issues, whereby literature highlights the influence of financial architectures, perceived obstacles, and policy-related goals in shaping sustainable investment. Lastly, social and experiential dimensions are prominent, highlighting the ways in which limited knowledge, motivation, and social identity contingencies influence investors' everyday experience with green investment. Together, the subject modelling highlights that green finance discourse is informed not just by structural and financial logic but by deeply ingrained psychological, social, and ethical aspects. This further emphasizes the need to embrace a behavioural approach to investigating investor attitudes and experience in sustainable finance.
Text clustering analysis:
The text clustering analysis identified three clusters that are distinct and capture the essence of the dimensions of green investing research and investor behaviour. The first cluster is about theoretical and cognitive foundations, with words like theory, cognitive, and values suggesting concern with conceptual bases and psychological inclinations. This category indicates that current research tends to base green investing on behavioural and cognitive theory, exploring how cognitive frames and personal values guide sustainable financial decisions. The second cluster is cantered on behavioural dynamics and decision processes, using language such as biases, perceptions, risk, psychological, and shaping. This suggests a robust stream of research into how psychological factors, heuristics, and biases affect investor decision-making, particularly when they are confronted with trade-offs between financial rewards and sustainability. The third cluster concerns market challenges and practical opportunities with the vocabulary of investors, products, practices, financial, sustainability, concerns, and regulatory. Such a classification embodies the institutional and structural aspects of green investing, pointing to matters of credibility of the market, regulation mechanisms, and the increasing demand for sustainable products.
Together, these clusters accentuate that the green investing discourse is multifield, bringing together theoretical views, behavioural insights, and real-world market considerations. The theoretical cluster lays the groundwork for probing the motivations of investors, the behavioural cluster outlines decision-making mechanisms, and the market cluster maps the wider institutional and regulatory environment. The clustering result thus supports the need to use an integrated methodology that integrates psychological, behavioural, and structural approaches to best reflect investor experiences and perceptions in green finance. This integration also implies that the next generation of studies should seek to connect these clusters, delivering aggregative findings that integrate theory with practice and behavioural patterns with institutional settings.
Thematic analysis:
The three interrelated clusters of theoretical and cognitive foundations, behavioural dynamics and decision-making, and practical opportunities with market challenges, as identified by the thematic analysis of Behavioural Dynamics of Green Investing, cumulatively represent a comprehensive picture of investor conduct in sustainable finance. The first grouping emphasizes the theoretical frameworks underlying sustainable investment, including the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), Prospect Theory, and Cognitive Dissonance, as well as highlighting ethical orientations and cognitive viewpoints that affect sustainable investment decisions. These theories form the context for explaining how values, trust, and cognitive appraisal inform investor decisions. The second cluster encompasses investor-specific behavioural drivers, which encompass risk aversion, herding behaviour, and subjective expectations biases, as well as psychological motives and heuristic shortcuts. These highlight that green investment choices are frequently influenced not just by rational computation but also by experiential, emotional, and framing effects. The third cluster illuminates market reality and context challenges, namely the alignment of returns with sustainable patterns, the effect of regulatory frameworks and policy regimes, and general social dimensions like awareness, identity, and collective investor experiences. Collectively, these motifs imply that green investing is more than a financial activity but a multifaceted process driven by an amalgamation of cognitive frames, behavioural heuristics, and structural contexts.
CONCLUSION
A
The thematic clusters' analysis in green investing highlights that investor action in sustainable finance is driven by a complex interaction between cognitive frames, behavioural biases, structural contexts, and ethical values. The evidence indicates that the decision-making in this area goes beyond rational calculations of returns and is driven by trust perceptions, risk perceptions, and social identity as well as policy-influenced and market-influenced factors. The findings obtained validate the necessity of adopting a holistic approach to green investing, combining behavioural, institutional, and cognitive factors in order to improve and better understand sustainable investment practices.SDG Contribution of the Study
The results of this study contribute significantly to SDG-related sustainable finance, as it presents various behavioural, cognitive, and market-related aspects that drive green investment decisions. In highlighting the drivers of investor participation in sustainable assets, the study contributes to attaining both SDG 7 and SDG 13 by deepening the understanding of how behavioural finance can facilitate capital flow toward clean energy and climate-aligned projects. Emphasis on responsible decision-making also cuts across to SDG 12, while discussions on some regulatory and institutional mechanisms connect the results to SDG 17. Integrating these insights will further reinforce the contributions of this study to the broader global sustainability agenda and its alignment with the conference subtheme of Green Finance and SDGs.
Managerial Implications
Practitioners and financial managers learn from the research the need to create strategies that look beyond the conventional financial parameters. Companies and investment platforms ought to create products that convey not just potential revenues but also social and environmental integrity of investments. Transparency of reporting and the avoidance of greenwashing risk can foster trust and induce wider participation. Additionally, the use of behavioural insights—like framing and investor nudges—can improve engagement by linking financial opportunity to sustainability values. Managers then need to develop both financial and ethical stories to find and keep investors in green markets.
Research Implications
A
The thematic synthesis enriches the body of academic work by unearthing the multidimensional nature of green investing research, highlighting the crossover between behavioural finance, psychology, and institutional economics. By grouping theoretical underpinnings, behavioural processes, and structural market concerns, this research offers an orientation for researchers to study these interdependencies in a more systematic manner. It also emphasizes the importance of additional integrative research bridging theory and practice, especially research that embraces qualitative and computational approaches like natural language processing (NLP) to pick up subtle investor sentiments.Theoretical Implications
From a theoretical standpoint, the findings broaden the application of behavioural and cognitive theories—like the Theory of Planned Behaviour, Prospect Theory, and Cognitive Dissonance Theory—into the field of sustainable finance. They illustrate how such frameworks can account for both rational and irrational decision-making, as well as the moral and identity aspects of investor decision-making. The discussion also suggests the necessity to modify prevailing theories to incorporate sustainability-specific issues like greenwashing, institutional uncertainty, and changing regulatory arrangements. This incorporation enhances the theoretical framework of behavioural finance by incorporating sustainability as a core concept.
Integration of Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence
The results from NLP-based topic modelling, text clustering, and thematic analysis accord well with the theoretical frameworks adopted in this research. TPB comes forth in the data in the form of clusters identifying attitude, social norms, and perceived behavioural control, showing that environmental values and social identity in investors lead to the choice of green investments. Prospect Theory finds resonance in themes of risk perception, loss aversion, and framing effect; the data shows that while returns remain an important factor in judging green investments, the framing of risks in sustainable contexts is equally considered by investors. Cognitive Dissonance Theory is consistent with evidence that investors strive for consistency between pro-environmental beliefs and investment behaviour - a fact that explains the recent trend towards the adoption of sustainable instruments despite financial trade-offs.
By identifying herding, overconfidence, and heuristic-driven decision-making, the clusters support Behavioural Finance Theory and reflect a strong behavioural foundation that grounds decisions for green investments. The additional supportive structural and market-related evidence includes regulatory uncertainty, greenwashing risks, and fragmentation, all of which also support institutional theories that suggest that external systems shape behavioural choices. In summary, the correspondence between theoretical expectations and empirical results stresses that sustainable investment behaviour is the result of an interaction between psychological factors, cognitive frames, and structural conditions.
Future Directions
Future empirical research would engage in testing the thematic clusters discovered using qualitative and computational methods. Longitudinal studies can investigate the ways investors' attitudes change with policy, technology, and market structure shifts. Research widening its scope to emerging markets might also reveal exceptional behavioural patterns influenced by cultural, institutional, and economic contexts. In addition, what contribution financial technology and artificial intelligence make towards shaping sustainable investment decisions also needs to be scrutinized more closely, especially in reference to digital tools being able to counteract biases, improve transparency, and encourage well-informed decision-making. Taken together, these paths would assist in building a more holistic appreciation of the changing nature of green investing.
A
Author Contribution
Suma B R - wrote the manuscript textDr. Shreelatha H R - Reviewed the manuscript
REFERENCES
Baker, H.K., Kumar, S., Goyal, N.: Emerging market investors’ behavioural biases. Rev. Behav. Finance. 11(2), 201–220 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-07-2018-0064
Flammer, C.: Corporate green bonds. J. Financ. Econ. 142(2), 499–516 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
Friede, G., Busch, T., Bassen, A.: ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J. Sustainable Finance Invest. 5(4), 210–233 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Nair, A., Ladha, R.: Investors’ awareness and preferences towards socially responsible investments in India. Social Responsib. J. 15(7), 901–917 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2017-0131
Shiller, R.J.: Irrational exuberance, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press (2015)
Widyawati, L.: A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics. Bus. Strategy Environ. 29(2), 619–637 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2393
Baker, H.K., Kumar, S., Goyal, N., Gaur, V.: How financial literacy and demographic variables relate to behavioural biases. Managerial Finance. 45(1), 124–146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-01-2018-0003
Suma, B.R., Udupa, K.R., Supriya, P.: Smart strategies for AI integration in modern wealth management. Zenodo. (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16608342
Nofsinger, J.R., Varma, A.: Socially responsible funds and market crises. J. Banking Finance. 48, 180–193 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.016
Riedl, A., Smeets, P.: Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds? J. Finance. 72(6), 2505–2550 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12547
Taufique, K.M.R., Vaithianathan, S.: A fresh look at understanding green consumer behaviour among young urban Indian consumers through the lens of theory of planned behaviour. J. Clean. Prod. 183, 46–55 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.097
Bauer, R., Ruof, T., Smeets, P.: Get real! Individuals prefer more sustainable investments. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(8), 3976–4043 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab021
López-González, E., Martínez-Ferrero, J., García-Meca, E.: Gender diversity on boards and socially responsible investment funds. Sustainability. 11(2), 556 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020556
Sandberg, J., Nilsson, J., Emmelin, L.: A contractarian approach to the legitimacy of SRI. Bus. Ethics: Eur. Rev. 18(2), 144–163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01554.x
Berk, J.B., van Binsbergen, J.H.: The impact of impact investing. J. Financ. Econ. 142(2), 566–584 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.002
Wins, A., Zwergel, B.: Comparing those who do, might and will not invest in sustainable funds: A survey among German retail fund investors. Bus. Res. 9(1), 51–99 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-015-0025-4
Amel-Zadeh, A., Serafeim, G.: Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Anal. J. 74(3), 87–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2
Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., Li, X.: Active ownership. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(12), 3225–3268 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv044
Scholtens, B., Sievänen, R.: Drivers of socially responsible investing: A case study of four Nordic countries. J. Bus. Ethics. 115(3), 605–616 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1410-7
Bannier, C.E., Bofinger, Y., Rock, B.: Doing good with other people’s money: On the foundations of investor loyalty in the financial industry. J. Banking Finance. 102, 91–107 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.03.011
A
Suma, B.R., Supriya, P., Eco-Conscious Investing: A Systematic Review on Green Investments. https://doi.org/10.6025/pms/2024/13/2/72-78Revelli, C., Viviani, J.L.: Financial performance of socially responsible investing (SRI): What have we learned? A meta-analysis. Bus. Ethics: Eur. Rev. 24(2), 158–185 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12076
Eccles, R.G., Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G.: The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Manage. Sci. 60(11), 2835–2857 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Kölbel, J.F., Heeb, F., Paetzold, F., Busch, T.: Can sustainable investing save the world? Reviewing the mechanisms of investor impact. Organ. Environ. 33(4), 554–574 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026620919202
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., Starks, L.T.: The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(3), 1067–1111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137
Zerbib, O.D.: The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. J. Banking Finance. 98, 39–60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012
Giglio, S., Kelly, B., Stroebel, J.: Climate finance. Annual Rev. Financial Econ. 13, 15–36 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-102120-113758
Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I.: Sustainable finance: A new paradigm. Glob. Financ. J. 24(2), 101–113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2013.07.006
Suma, B.R.: Sustainable Investment Trends: An Analysis of Investor Perception of Green Bonds in Bangalore. EKSPLORIUM-BULETIN PUSAT TEKNOLOGI BAHAN GALIAN NUKLIR. 46(1), 596–604 (2025)