Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Forest Cover and Climatic Variability in Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh (1988–2023)
A
Roshni Rai 1✉ Email
Dr.
Suchitra S Pardeshi 1
1 Department of Geography Prof Ramkrishna More A.C.S. College Pune India
Roshni Rai 1*, Dr. Suchitra S Pardeshi 2
*1 Department of Geography, Prof Ramkrishna More A.C.S. College, Pune, India
2Department of Geography, Prof Ramkrishna More A.C.S. College, Pune, India
*Corresponding author: roshnichamlingrai13@gmail.com
Abstract
Understanding long-term forest dynamics and their climatic controls is critical for managing ecologically sensitive mountain landscapes. This study examines spatio-temporal forest cover change and associated climatic variability in Lohit District, located within the Eastern Himalayan biodiversity hotspot, over a 35-year period (1988–2023). Multi-temporal Landsat imagery was used to derive the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Land Surface Temperature (LST), which were integrated with long-term gridded rainfall data from the India Meteorological Department to assess vegetation transitions and climate–vegetation interactions.
The results reveal pronounced structural degradation of forest ecosystems rather than large-scale deforestation. Dense forest cover declined sharply from 3,122.39 km² (70.05%) in 1988 to 908.35 km² (20.38%) in 2023. This loss was accompanied by substantial expansion of moderate forest and shrub–grassland classes, indicating widespread canopy thinning, fragmentation, and secondary succession. Climatic analysis shows a significant decline in precipitation, with minimum annual rainfall decreasing by approximately 67%, alongside progressive surface warming, reflected in increases in both minimum and maximum LST.
Spearman’s rank correlation analysis demonstrates a strong positive relationship between NDVI and rainfall and a strong negative relationship between NDVI and LST, highlighting the coupled influence of hydroclimatic stress and land-cover change on vegetation dynamics. The interaction of declining rainfall, rising surface temperatures, and sustained anthropogenic pressures particularly timber extraction, shifting cultivation, and infrastructure expansion has constrained forest recovery and reinforced degraded forest states.
The findings underscore the vulnerability of Eastern Himalayan forests to compound climatic and human pressures and emphasize the need for climate-integrated, ecosystem-based forest management. Long-term satellite-based monitoring combined with hydroclimatic assessment provides a robust framework for guiding adaptive conservation strategies and enhancing ecological resilience in climate-sensitive mountain regions.
Keywords:
Forest cover change
NDVI
Land Surface Temperature
Climate variability
Rainfall variability
Remote sensing
Vegetation dynamics
Eastern Himalayas
A
A
Introduction
Forests of the Eastern Himalayas play a critical role in maintaining ecological stability, regulating hydrological processes, and sequestering carbon, while supporting exceptionally high levels of biodiversity. Lohit District, situated within a transitional zone between tropical and subtropical biomes, represents an ecologically sensitive landscape and a key regional biodiversity hotspot. Despite this ecological significance, the district has experienced sustained forest degradation over recent decades, driven by rapid land-use change associated with shifting cultivation, timber extraction, infrastructure expansion, and increasing climatic variability (Roychowdhury, 1992; IPCC, 2021).
Understanding how forest degradation is shaped by interacting climatic and anthropogenic drivers requires accurate, consistent, and long-term monitoring of vegetation dynamics. Satellite-based remote sensing provides a robust and scalable framework for capturing such changes across large spatial extents and extended time periods. Among satellite-derived indicators, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is widely used as a proxy for vegetation greenness, canopy density, and ecosystem productivity. When analysed alongside climatic variables such as rainfall and Land Surface Temperature (LST), NDVI enables the quantitative assessment of climate–vegetation coupling and the identification of hydroclimatic stress signals influencing forest condition.
While numerous studies in the Eastern Himalayas have documented patterns of forest fragmentation, biodiversity loss, and biomass change, relatively few have statistically quantified the strength and direction of relationships between vegetation dynamics and hydroclimatic variability over multi-decadal timescales. District-level analyses that integrate long-term satellite records with non-parametric statistical methods remain limited. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis offers a robust approach for evaluating monotonic relationships between NDVI, rainfall, and LST, especially in heterogeneous mountainous environments where environmental variables often exhibit non-normal distributions and complex, non-linear interactions.
Against this backdrop, the present study applies multi-temporal remote sensing and geospatial analysis to examine forest cover dynamics in Lohit District over a 35-year period (1988–2023), with particular emphasis on quantifying climate–vegetation linkages using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. The specific objectives are to: (i) delineate spatio-temporal forest cover changes using NDVI-based classification; (ii) analyse long-term trends in rainfall and land surface temperature; (iii) statistically evaluate relationships between vegetation condition, precipitation, and surface thermal regimes using Spearman’s rank correlation; and (iv) derive implications for climate-responsive and adaptive forest management.
By explicitly linking satellite-derived vegetation indicators with hydroclimatic variables through robust statistical analysis, this study advances understanding of forest–climate interactions in the Eastern Himalayas. The findings provide a quantitative basis for disentangling the combined effects of climate variability and anthropogenic disturbance and offer critical insights for evidence-based conservation planning and sustainable land-use management in climate-sensitive mountain landscapes.
Study Area
The study was conducted in Lohit District, located in eastern Arunachal Pradesh between 27°50′–28°20′ N latitude and 96°00′–97°00′ E longitude, covering a total geographical area of 3,735 km² (Fig. 1), as reported by the Government of Arunachal Pradesh. The district exhibits pronounced physiographic heterogeneity, extending from alluvial floodplains and foothills in the southern parts to highly rugged Himalayan terrain in the north, with elevations exceeding 5,500 m above mean sea level. Major river systems, including the Lohit, Dibang, and Kamlang rivers, traverse the district and play a significant role in shaping sediment transport, floodplain development, and valley morphology (Singh et al., 2017). The interaction of complex topography and a dense drainage network generate distinct ecological gradients that strongly influence spatial patterns of vegetation cover and land use (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Geographical location and topographic extent of Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
Click here to Correct
Climatically, Lohit District spans conditions ranging from humid subtropical in the lowlands to temperate and alpine regimes at higher elevations. The region receives high annual precipitation, with mean annual rainfall generally exceeding 3,000 mm, the majority of which occurs during the Southwest Monsoon (June–September). Intense monsoonal rainfall, in combination with steep slopes and geologically fragile terrain, results in frequent landslides, soil erosion, and riverbank instability, making the landscape highly sensitive to both climatic variability and land-use disturbances (Tiwari et al., 2015; IMD, 2020).
Vegetation exhibits pronounced altitudinal zonation, comprising tropical semi-evergreen forests, moist deciduous forests, and subtropical broadleaf forest formations. Dominant species include Dipterocarpus gracilis (hollong) and Terminalia myriocarpa (hollock), which are characteristic components of Eastern Himalayan Forest ecosystems. These forests form part of the Eastern Himalayan biodiversity hotspot, supporting high species richness and exhibiting biogeographic affinities with both Indo-Malayan and Palearctic regions (Gadgil & Guha, 1995; FSI, 2021).
The district is inhabited by ethnically diverse communities, including the Mishmi, Khamti, and Singpho tribes, along with Tibetan and Chakma settlers (Ramakrishnan, 1992; Hazarika, 2000). Livelihoods are predominantly agrarian, and jhum (shifting) cultivation remains a widespread land-use practice. While culturally significant, the shortening of fallow cycles and expansion of cultivation have contributed to progressive forest degradation and landscape fragmentation (Tripathi & Barik, 2003).
Overall, the combination of topographic complexity, climatic variability, and ecological richness underscores the significance of Lohit District as a representative landscape for examining forest cover dynamics and forest–climate interactions within the Eastern Himalayan region.
Materials and Methods
Materials
The present study utilized multi-temporal satellite imagery, meteorological datasets, and ancillary geospatial data to analyze the spatio-temporal patterns of vegetation cover, rainfall variability, and land surface temperature (LST) across the Lohit District. The data sources, their characteristics, and applications are summarized below.
Satellite Data
Landsat satellite imagery from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) was the primary dataset used for vegetation and LST analysis. Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) and Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) datasets were obtained from the USGS Earth Explorer portal (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov).
The datasets were selected for the years 1988, 1993, 1998, 2003, 2008, 2013, 2018, and 2023, ensuring cloud-free or minimal-cloud coverage for the study area. Both sensors provide multispectral and thermal bands suitable for the derivation of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Land Surface Temperature (LST) (Chander & Markham, 2003; Roy et al., 2014).
Landsat 5 TM offers a spatial resolution of 30 m for visible and near-infrared bands and 120 m (resampled to 30 m) for the thermal band.
Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS provides 30 m spatial resolution for reflective bands and 100 m (resampled to 30 m) for the thermal bands (Band 10 and 11).
Radiometric calibration and atmospheric correction were performed using metadata parameters (Lmax, Lmin, K1, K2, ML, AL) provided in the accompanying MTL files.
Rainfall Data
High-resolution gridded rainfall data were obtained from the India Meteorological Department (IMD), Pune, through the IMD Gridded Rainfall Archive (https://www.imd.gov.in).
The dataset provides monthly and annual accumulated rainfall estimates at a spatial resolution of 0.25° × 0.25° (~ 25 km) (Pai et al., 2014).
Data were acquired in NetCDF/ASCII format and processed in ArcGIS to produce annual rainfall maps for the selected years. As the IMD datasets are already quality-controlled and bias-corrected, no further interpolation was required.
Ancillary and Supporting Data
Administrative boundary shapefiles for Lohit District were obtained from the Survey of India (SOI) and Bhuvan Geoportal (National Remote Sensing Centre, NRSC) (https://bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in).
These datasets were used to clip Landsat and IMD raster data, ensuring spatial consistency during analysis.
NDVI classification thresholds and emissivity coefficients were adapted from Tucker (1979), Jensen (2005), and Pettorelli (2013), while emissivity–NDVI relationships followed empirical models proposed by Sobrino et al. (2004) and Van de Griend & Owe (1993).
A
Table 1
Summary of Data Sources Used in the Study
Dataset
Source Provider
Sensor Product
Spatial Resolution
Temporal Coverage
Application
Landsat 5 TM
USGS Earth Explorer
Thematic Mapper
30 m (VIS–NIR), 120 m (TIR)
1988–2008
NDVI, LST analysis
Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS
USGS Earth Explorer
OLI & TIRS
30 m (OLI), 100 m (TIRS)
2013–2023
NDVI, LST analysis
IMD Gridded Rainfall
India Meteorological Department (IMD), Pune
Gridded Rainfall (0.25° × 0.25°)
~ 25 km
1988–2023
Rainfall trend analysis
District Boundary Data
Survey of India (SOI), Bhuvan (NRSC)
Administrative shapefiles
1:50,000
2023
Clipping, mapping
Methods
NDVI-Based Land Cover Classification
The NDVI is computed as: NDVI = NIR-R/NIR + R
Where, NIR = Near Infrared
R = Red Band
NDVI values range between − 1 and + 1. Values closer to + 1 denote dense, healthy vegetation; values near zero indicate sparse or stressed vegetation, barren land, or urban surfaces; negative values correspond to water bodies or non-vegetated areas (Jensen, 2005; Pettorelli et al., 2005).
A
Table 2
NDVI Value Ranges and Land Cover Types
Range of NDVI Value
Name of Objects
-1
Water Body
0
Bare Soil, Rock, Sand and Snow, Cloud
0.2–0.3
Shrub and Grassland
0.3–0.5
Sparse and Unhealthy Forest
> 0.5
Dense and Healthy Forest
Source: Adapted from Research Gate and standard NDVI classification schemes (Tucker, 1979; Pettorelli, 2013).
Threshold-based classification categorized land cover into:(1) Water bodies, (2) Bare soil/rock/sand/snow/cloud, (3) Shrub–grassland, (4) Moderate Forest, and (5) Dense Forest.
Accuracy assessments were performed using field observations and high-resolution Google Earth imagery, achieving overall accuracies between 85–90%.
Rainfall Trend Analysis
A
High-resolution gridded rainfall data were obtained from the IMD Gridded Rainfall Archive (www.imd.gov.in). This dataset provides monthly and annual accumulated rainfall estimates at a spatial resolution of 0.25° × 0.25°, which is suitable for spatial interpolation and zonation. For each selected year (1988, 1993, 1998, 2003, 2008, 2013, 2018, and 2023), monthly gridded rainfall data (NetCDF or ASCII format) were converted to raster format in ArcGIS. Monthly grids were stacked and aggregated using the Cell Statistics tool to compute total annual rainfall. The annual rainfall rasters were clipped to the Lohit District boundary using the Extract by Mask function. Since the IMD data are already gridded and quality-controlled, no additional interpolation was required. Final rainfall maps were prepared using a consistent classified color scheme to depict rainfall intensity zones, with appropriate cartographic elements to support spatial comparison across years.
Land Surface Temperature (LST) Analysis
Temporal patterns were assessed for warming or stabilization phases. a) Conversion of Digital Numbers (DN) to Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Radiance To convert the digital number (DN) values from Landsat 5 thermal infrared data (Band 6) to TOA spectral radiance (Lλ), the following equation is applied:
Where:
Lλ = Top-of-atmosphere spectral radiance (W/m²·sr·µm)
Lmax = Maximum radiance value for the thermal band (from metadata)
Lmin = Minimum radiance value for the thermal band (from metadata)
Qcal_max = Maximum DN value for the thermal band (typically 255 for 8-bit data)
Qcal_min = Minimum DN value for the thermal band (typically 0 for 8-bit data)
Qcal = Digital number (DN) value of the pixel in the thermal band
This conversion adjusts for the dynamic range of the sensor, transforming the pixel values from DN to radiance values that are physically meaningful and suitable for further temperature calculation.
b) Conversion of TOA Radiance to Brightness Temperature (BT)
The TOA radiance obtained in the previous step is then converted to brightness temperature (BT) in Kelvin using the Planck function, with the following equation:
Where:
BT = Brightness temperature (Kelvin)
Lλ = Top-of-atmosphere radiance (calculated from Step 1)
K1 = Band-specific thermal constant 1 (from metadata)
K2 = Band-specific thermal constant 2 (from metadata)
These constants are specific to Landsat 5 and are typically provided in the metadata files (MTL) for each scene. The formula uses logarithmic transformation based on the inverse relationship between radiance and temperature in thermal infrared wavelengths.
c) Conversion of Brightness Temperature to Land Surface Temperature (LST)
Finally, to estimate the Land Surface Temperature (LST), the brightness temperature is corrected for atmospheric effects and emissivity (ϵ\epsilon) using the following equation:
Where:
LST = Land Surface Temperature (Kelvin)
BT = Brightness temperature (calculated from Step 2)
ϵ = Surface emissivity (dimensionless)
0.00115 and 1.4388 are constants related to the spectral properties of thermal radiation
The emissivity value (ϵ\epsilon) accounts for the effects of surface material type (e.g., vegetation, water, urban areas) on the thermal radiation observed by the sensor. Emissivity can be determined based on land cover classification or by using standard values (e.g., 0.95 for vegetation, 0.98 for water bodies).
Land Surface Temperature (LST) Calculation of Landsat 8
The calculation of Land Surface Temperature (LST) for Landsat 8 data follows a multi-step procedure that involves radiometric correction, the calculation of brightness temperature (BT), vegetation indices, and the determination of land surface emissivity (ε), followed by the final estimation of LST. The following sections describe the steps involved in the LST calculation, utilizing the thermal infrared bands and associated formulas:
a) Conversion from Digital Number (DN) to Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Radiance (L)
The first step in the radiometric processing of Landsat 8 data is to convert the Digital Numbers (Qcal) from the thermal infrared band (Band 10) to Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) radiance. The relationship is given by:
Where:
L is the TOA radiance (W.m-2.sr-1. µm-1),
ML is the multiplicative scaling factor (from metadata),
Qcal is the pixel value or Digital Number (DN) from the thermal band,
AL is the additive scaling factor (from metadata).
This step corrects for the sensor's response to incoming radiation, producing the TOA radiance values necessary for further processing.
b) Conversion from TOA Radiance to Brightness Temperature (BT)
Once the TOA radiance is obtained, it is converted to brightness temperature (BT) in Kelvin using the following equation, which is based on Planck’s law:
Where:
BT is the brightness temperature in degrees Celsius,
K1 and K2 are thermal constants specific to Landsat 8 (from metadata),
L is the TOA radiance calculated in the previous step.
This step provides an estimate of the Earth's surface temperature in Kelvin, which is subsequently converted to degrees Celsius by subtracting 273.15.
c) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)
The NDVI is used to quantify vegetation cover, as it has a significant influence on the land surface emissivity (ε). NDVI is calculated using the reflectance values from the red (Band 4) and near-infrared (Band 5) bands of Landsat 8:
Where:
Band 5 is the Near-Infrared (NIR) band,
Band 4 is the Red band.
NDVI values range from − 1 to + 1, with higher values indicating denser vegetation. NDVI plays a key role in estimating land surface emissivity, as it influences the amount of vegetation cover.
d) Vegetation Proportion (Pv)
The vegetation proportion (Pv) is derived from the NDVI values and reflects the fraction of the land surface covered by vegetation. It is calculated using the formula:
Where:
NDVI min and NDVI max are the minimum and maximum values of NDVI observed in the study area, respectively.
The square root transformation normalizes the Pv values, ensuring they fall within the range of 0 to 1, where 0 represents bare soil and 1 represents dense vegetation.
e) Land Surface Emissivity (ε)
Land surface emissivity (ϵ\epsilon) is a key factor influencing the conversion of brightness temperature to LST. It is estimated from the vegetation proportion (Pv) using the empirical relationship:
This equation reflects the relationship between the amount of vegetation (as indicated by Pv) and the surface’s ability to emit thermal radiation. The emissivity of bare soil and dense vegetation differ, which impacts the final LST calculation.
f) Calculation of Land Surface Temperature (LST)
Finally, the LST is derived by correcting the brightness temperature (BT) for the effects of emissivity using the following equation:
Where:
LST is the Land Surface Temperature in Celsius,
BT is the brightness temperature in Celsius,
ϵ is the land surface emissivity.
The term
accounts for the relationship between the brightness temperature and the emissivity. The natural logarithmic transformation of ϵ adjusts the temperature for different land surface types both temporal trends and spatial patterns.
Statistical Analysis
To quantify the relationships between vegetation dynamics and climatic variables, Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was applied to examine associations among Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), rainfall, and Land Surface Temperature (LST) for the period 1988–2023. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ) is a non-parametric statistical measure that evaluates the strength and direction of monotonic relationships between variables and is particularly suitable for long-term environmental datasets that may exhibit non-normal distributions, outliers, or heteroscedasticity (Conover, 1999; Wilks, 2011).
Annual mean NDVI values derived from satellite imagery were statistically compared with corresponding annual rainfall totals and mean LST values to assess climate–vegetation linkages. This approach minimizes the influence of short-term variability and emphasizes long-term coupling between vegetation condition and hydroclimatic factors, as commonly adopted in large-scale vegetation–climate interaction studies (Myneni et al., 1997; Zhou et al., 2016).
Spearman’s rank correlation was preferred over parametric alternatives (e.g., Pearson’s correlation) because NDVI, rainfall, and LST time series often violate assumptions of linearity and normality, particularly in heterogeneous mountainous environments (Legendre & Legendre, 2012). Statistical significance was evaluated at a confidence level of p < 0.05, consistent with standard practice in environmental and climatological research.
The resulting correlation coefficients were used to characterize the direction and relative strength of associations between vegetation greenness, moisture availability, and surface thermal conditions, providing a quantitative basis for interpreting climate–vegetation interactions discussed in subsequent sections.
Results
Spatio-Temporal Forest Cover Change (1988–2023)
Spatio-temporal analysis of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Landsat-derived classified imagery from 1988 to 2023 reveals pronounced changes in vegetation density, composition, and spatial distribution across Lohit District. Over the past three and a half decades, the district has undergone a systematic transformation of forest structure, reflecting the combined effects of sustained anthropogenic pressure and hydroclimatic variability.
NDVI-based land-cover maps (Figs. 36) illustrate a persistent decline in dense forest cover accompanied by a concurrent expansion of moderate forest and shrub–grassland classes. The quantitative evolution of land-cover categories is summarized in Table 3 and illustrated in Fig. 2. Dense forest cover decreased continuously from 3,122.39 km² (70.05%) in 1988 to 908.35 km² (20.38%) in 2023, representing a net loss of approximately 71% over the study period. This trend indicates widespread canopy thinning and forest degradation rather than abrupt or localized deforestation
Table 3
Temporal dynamics of land-cover classes in Lohit District (1988–2023).
Class
1988
(Sq Km)
1993
(Sq Km)
1998
(Sq Km)
2003
(Sq Km)
2008
(Sq Km)
2013
(Sq Km)
2018
(Sq Km)
2023
(Sq Km)
Water Body
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Bare Soil, Rock, Sand and Snow, Cloud
302.94
362.38
436.99
372.72
269.17
247.15
251.93
145.66
Shrub and Grassland
536.56
649.10
508.81
808.38
631.05
849.42
1066.09
1283.73
Moderate Forest
495.59
558.21
881.73
611.56
952.77
804.41
1561.36
2119.60
Dense Forest
3122.39
2887.76
2629.91
2664.79
2604.41
2556.39
1578.01
908.35
Total
4457.48
4457.44
4457.45
4457.46
4457.40
4457.38
4457.39
4457.34
In contrast, moderate forest cover increased substantially from 495.59 km² to 2,119.60 km², corresponding to an increase of approximately 327%, suggesting large-scale conversion of dense forest into lower-canopy forest formations. Similarly, shrub–grassland cover expanded from 536.56 km² to 1,283.73 km², an increase of nearly 139%, reflecting progressive forest degradation, secondary succession, and the expansion of disturbed landscapes. Areas classified as bare soil, rock, sand, snow, and cloud exhibited temporal variability but declined overall from 302.94 km² in 1988 to 145.66 km² in 2023, potentially indicating partial vegetation recovery in previously exposed zones. Water bodies showed no detectable change throughout the study period. The total geographical area remained nearly constant at approximately 4,457 km² across all time slices, confirming that the observed trends represent actual land-cover transitions rather than classification or geometric artifacts.
Fig. 2
Spatio-temporal changes in land-cover classes in Lohit District (1988–2023).
Click here to Correct
The observed spatio-temporal patterns of forest cover change are closely linked to anthropogenic drivers operating in the district. Historical records document the rapid expansion of plywood and timber industries in Lohit and adjacent districts during the 1990s, resulting in large-scale extraction of commercially valuable species such as Dipterocarpus gracilis (hollong) and Terminalia myriocarpa (hollock) (Roychowdhury, 1992). In addition, traditional jhum (shifting) cultivation, practiced primarily by the Tai Khampti and Singpho communities, has contributed to forest clearance and delayed regeneration, particularly where fallow periods have shortened (FAO, 2020).
Population growth and agricultural expansion have further intensified land-use conversion, while infrastructure development, including road construction, hydropower projects, and settlement expansion has accelerated habitat fragmentation and landscape discontinuity (Dash et al., 2007). These pressures are compounded by illegal logging, forest fires, and encroachment, which collectively exacerbate forest degradation and increase the likelihood of long-term ecological transformation (Aymonier et al., 2010).
Fig. 3
NDVI Map of Lohit District of the Year 1988 and 1993
Click here to Correct
Fig. 4
NDVI Map of Lohit District of the Year 1998 and 2003
Click here to Correct
Fig. 5
NDVI Map of Lohit District of the Year 2008 and 2013
Click here to Correct
Fig. 6
NDVI Map of Lohit District of the Year 2018 and 2023
Click here to Correct
Overall, the spatio-temporal analysis reveals a clear shift from dense forest dominance toward structurally simplified forest and non-forest vegetation types. The results underscore sustained forest degradation driven by interacting human activities and environmental stressors, highlighting the need for integrated forest management approaches to arrest further decline and support long-term ecosystem recovery.
Spatio-temporal analysis of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Landsat-derived classified imagery from 1988 to 2023 reveals pronounced changes in vegetation density, composition, and spatial distribution across Lohit District. The observed trends reflect the combined influence of sustained anthropogenic pressure and hydroclimatic variability operating over the past three and a half decades.
Spatio-Temporal Rainfall Variability (1988–2023)
Spatio-temporal analysis of rainfall data derived from Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) gridded datasets for Lohit District over the period 1988–2023 reveals pronounced temporal variability and clear long-term changes in precipitation patterns across the district. Rainfall characteristics were assessed using annual minimum and maximum rainfall values, which effectively capture interannual extremes and provide insight into long-term hydroclimatic trends.
Annual rainfall statistics (Table 4) indicate a consistent and statistically significant declining trend over the 35-year study period. Maximum annual rainfall decreased from 3,456.97 mm in 1988 to 2,179.38 mm in 2023, corresponding to an overall reduction of approximately 37%. In contrast, minimum annual rainfall exhibited a more pronounced decline, decreasing from 3,092.21 mm to 1,011.67 mm, representing an approximate 67% reduction. The sharper decline in minimum rainfall suggests an increasing frequency and severity of low-precipitation years, which may intensify moisture stress during critical periods of vegetation growth and regeneration. Trend detection using the Mann–Kendall non-parametric test confirms that both minimum and maximum rainfall series exhibit statistically significant negative trends (Mann, 1945; Kendall, 1975).
Table 4
Annual Minimum and Maximum Rainfall in Lohit District (1988–2023)
Sr No
Year
Minimum Rainfall (mm)
Maximum Rainfall (mm)
1
1988
3092.205811
3456.973389
2
1993
2027.736206
2512.824707
3
1998
2647.476563
3276.518311
4
2003
2174.693115
2307.36792
5
2008
128.899414
2380.189453
6
2013
2001.283691
2410.336426
7
2018
1549.454834
2564.929932
8
2023
1011.670898
2179.380859
Temporal co-variation of rainfall and surface temperature is illustrated in Fig. 7, which highlights increasing interannual rainfall variability alongside a progressive decline in overall precipitation magnitude in recent decades. The widening range between minimum and maximum rainfall values in later years reflects heightened hydroclimatic variability, providing important climatic context for interpreting concurrent changes in vegetation condition and land surface temperature observed across the district.
Fig. 7
Temporal variation of minimum and maximum rainfall (mm) and temperature (°C) in Lohit District (1988–2023).
Click here to Correct
Spatial rainfall distribution maps (Figs. 811) further demonstrate marked spatio-temporal heterogeneity in precipitation across the district. The maps show a gradual contraction of high-rainfall zones (> 3,000 mm) and an expansion of moderate- to low-rainfall areas, particularly after 2000. These spatial patterns indicate a redistribution of rainfall intensity across the landscape rather than uniform decline.
Fig. 8
Rainfall Map of Lohit District of the Year 1988 and 1993
Click here to Correct
Fig. 9
Rainfall Map of Lohit District of the Year 1998 and 2000
Click here to Correct
Fig. 10
Rainfall Map of Lohit District of the Year 2008 and 201
Click here to Correct
Fig. 11
Rainfall Map of Lohit District of the Year 2018 and 2023
Click here to Correct
Overall, the rainfall analysis reveals a significant long-term decline in both minimum and maximum precipitation, accompanied by increasing interannual variability. These spatio-temporal trends provide a critical climatic context for interpreting observed changes in vegetation dynamics and forest cover across the district.
Spatio- Temporal Land Surface Temperature (LST) Trends (1988–2023)
Spatio-temporal analysis of Land Surface Temperature (LST) derived from Landsat 5 TM and Landsat 8 TIRS datasets indicates a clear warming tendency across Lohit District during the period 1988–2023. Annual minimum and maximum LST values were examined to characterize long-term thermal variability and changes in surface energy conditions. Summary statistics for selected years are presented in Table 5.
Table 5
Minimum and Maximum Land Surface Temperature (LST) in Lohit District (1988–2023)
Sr No
Year
Minimum Temperature (°C)
Maximum Temperature (°C)
1
1998
-21.1034
25.8268
2
1993
-17.8039
24.5451
3
1998
-17.8039
27.0957
4
2003
-22.461
24.5451
5
2008
-20.433
30.4201
6
2013
-13.7493
30.4019
7
2018
-17.7004
27.733
8
2023
-19.2224
26.3682
The LST records show an overall increase in surface thermal conditions over the study period. Maximum LST values increased from approximately 25.83°C in the late 1980s to 26.37°C in 2023, with the highest values exceeding 30°C observed during the mid-study years (2008–2013). These elevated maximum temperatures indicate enhanced daytime surface heating, particularly during years characterized by reduced vegetation cover and lower rainfall.
Minimum LST values also exhibit a long-term warming tendency, reflected in a reduction in the frequency and intensity of extremely low surface temperatures in recent years. Although interannual variability remains evident, the overall shift toward higher minimum LST values suggests progressive nighttime warming and reduced surface cooling, consistent with broader regional warming trends.
Temporal co-variation between rainfall and LST is illustrated in Fig. 12, which highlights an inverse pattern whereby periods of declining rainfall correspond to elevated surface temperatures. This temporal correspondence provides additional context for understanding concurrent changes in vegetation conditions observed during the same period.
Fig. 12
Temporal variation of rainfall (mm) and land surface temperature (°C) in Lohit District from 1988 to 2023.
Click here to Correct
A
Spatial distribution maps of LST (Figs. 13–16) further demonstrate pronounced spatio-temporal heterogeneity in surface temperature across the district. Over time, higher-temperature zones expand spatially, while cooler zones associated with dense forest cover contract. Increasing thermal contrasts between forested and non-forested areas are particularly evident in later years, reflecting the influence of land-cover change on surface energy balance.
Fig. 13
Land Surface Temperature of Lohit District of the Year 1988 and 1993
Click here to Correct
Fig. 14
Land Surface Temperature of Lohit District of the Year 1998 and 2003
Click here to Correct
Figure 15: Land Surface Temperature of Lohit District of the Year 2008 and 2013
Figure 16: Land Surface Temperature of Lohit District of the Year 2018 and 2023
Overall, the spatio-temporal LST analysis reveals a sustained increase in both daytime and nighttime surface temperatures across Lohit District, accompanied by increasing spatial heterogeneity. These thermal trends provide an important climatic context for interpreting observed changes in rainfall patterns and forest cover dynamics during the study period.
Discussion
The spatio-temporal analysis reveals a pronounced transformation of forest structure in Lohit District over the past 35 years, characterized by a substantial decline in dense forest cover and a concurrent expansion of moderate forest and shrub–grassland classes. This pattern reflects progressive forest degradation dominated by canopy thinning and structural simplification, rather than abrupt or large-scale deforestation. Comparable degradation trajectories have been reported across the Eastern Himalayas, where selective logging, shifting cultivation, and infrastructure expansion have altered forest composition while retaining partial canopy cover (Roychowdhury, 1992; Pandit et al., 2014).
Climate–Vegetation Interactions
To quantify the relationships between vegetation dynamics and hydroclimatic variables, Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was conducted between NDVI, rainfall, and Land Surface Temperature (LST) for the period 1988–2023 (Table X).
Table 6
Spearman’s rank correlation matrix (ρ) between NDVI, rainfall, and land surface temperature (LST) in Lohit District (1988–2023).
Variable
NDVI
Rainfall
LST
NDVI
1.00
+ 0.69*
–0.75*
Rainfall
+ 0.69*
1.00
–0.62*
LST
–0.75*
–0.62*
1.00
* Statistically significant at p < 0.05
The correlation matrix demonstrates strong and statistically significant linkages between vegetation greenness, precipitation, and surface thermal conditions. The positive association between NDVI and rainfall (ρ = +0.69, p < 0.05) indicates that vegetation productivity and canopy conditions in Lohit District are strongly regulated by moisture availability. In monsoon-dominated forest ecosystems, precipitation is a primary control on photosynthetic activity, biomass accumulation, and regeneration processes (Myneni et al., 1997; Zhou et al., 2016). Adequate rainfall enhances soil moisture availability and sustains canopy vigor, whereas reductions—particularly in minimum rainfall—can intensify moisture stress during critical growing periods. Such hydroclimatic stress is likely to constrain forest recovery and amplify degradation in areas already experiencing canopy thinning.
The strong negative correlation between NDVI and LST (ρ = − 0.75, p < 0.05) provides robust evidence that increasing surface temperatures are associated with declining vegetation vigor. Reduced canopy cover diminishes shading and evapotranspirative cooling, resulting in higher sensible heat flux and elevated land surface temperatures (Kalnay & Cai, 2003; Mildrexler et al., 2011). Elevated LST, in turn, exacerbates soil moisture depletion and imposes thermal stress on vegetation, thereby suppressing growth and regeneration. Similar NDVI–LST relationships have been widely documented across forested regions, highlighting the role of intact vegetation cover in regulating surface energy balance and mitigating warming (Peng et al., 2014).
The negative association between rainfall and LST (ρ = − 0.62, p < 0.05) further emphasizes the tight coupling between atmospheric moisture availability and surface thermal regimes. Reduced precipitation limits latent heat flux and enhances surface heating, leading to higher LST values, particularly in degraded or sparsely vegetated landscapes (Bonan, 2008; Zhou et al., 2016). This relationship underscores how hydroclimatic variability not only directly affects vegetation growth but also indirectly amplifies thermal stress through land–atmosphere feedback.
Taken together, the relationships presented in Table 6 provide quantitative evidence of a reinforcing climate–vegetation feedback in Lohit District. Declining rainfall and increasing surface temperatures act synergistically to weaken canopy structure, constrain vegetation recovery, and accelerate forest degradation. As dense forests transition toward more open or simplified states, their capacity to buffer local climate diminishes, potentially transforming them from regulators of surface temperature into contributors to surface warming. These findings highlight the importance of conserving remaining dense forest cover and promoting canopy restoration to enhance ecosystem resilience under ongoing climatic change.
Role of Anthropogenic Drivers
Anthropogenic pressures have acted synergistically with climatic stress to intensify forest degradation. Historical expansion of timber and plywood industries during the 1990s resulted in extensive extraction of commercially valuable species such as Dipterocarpus gracilis and Terminalia myriocarpa, leading to canopy opening and fragmentation (Roychowdhury, 1992). Traditional jhum (shifting) cultivation, particularly under shortened fallow cycles, has further limited forest recovery and promoted secondary vegetation dominance (Ramakrishnan, 1992; Tripathi & Barik, 2003). In addition, infrastructure development, including roads and hydropower projects—has increased landscape fragmentation and accessibility, reinforcing degradation processes (Dash et al., 2007).
The interaction between sustained human disturbance and increasing hydroclimatic variability explains the persistence of degraded forest states and the limited recovery of dense forest cover observed in recent decades. These findings underscore the vulnerability of Eastern Himalayan forests to compound pressures arising from land-use change and climate variability (Chapin et al., 2008; IPCC, 2021).
Overall, the Discussion demonstrates that forest dynamics in the district are governed by a synergistic interaction between vegetation condition, rainfall variability, surface thermal regimes, and anthropogenic disturbance, emphasizing the need to consider integrated climate–vegetation–land-use linkages in assessments of forest degradation and resilience.
Management Implications
The observed interactions between forest degradation, declining rainfall, and rising surface temperature highlight the necessity of climate-responsive and ecosystem-based forest management approaches. Restoration strategies should prioritize native, site-adapted, and drought-tolerant species to enhance resilience under increasing hydroclimatic variability. Maintaining and restoring canopy continuity is particularly important for reducing surface warming and stabilizing local microclimates (Peng et al., 2014).
Strengthening community-based forest management is essential in regions where traditional land-use practices remain integral to livelihoods. Improved fallow management, regulated timber extraction, and promotion of agroforestry systems can reduce pressure on natural forests while sustaining local economies (Ramakrishnan, 1992; FAO, 2020). In addition, micro-watershed development and soil–water conservation measures can mitigate moisture stress and reduce erosion in degraded landscapes.
A
Long-term satellite-based monitoring of vegetation indices, rainfall, and LST should be institutionalized to support early warning systems and adaptive management. Integrating remote sensing diagnostics with ground-based hydrometeorological observations can provide a robust framework for tracking ecosystem health and guiding policy interventions in the Eastern Himalayan region.
Conclusion
This study presents a comprehensive assessment of spatio-temporal forest cover change and its climatic drivers in Lohit District over a 35-year period (1988–2023), integrating multi-temporal NDVI, rainfall, and Land Surface Temperature datasets. The results reveal a pronounced decline in dense forest cover accompanied by significant expansion of moderate forest and shrub–grassland classes, indicating widespread and persistent forest degradation.
The concurrent decline in rainfall and increase in surface temperature demonstrate strong climate–vegetation linkages, with hydroclimatic stress amplifying the impacts of anthropogenic disturbance. The consistent negative relationship between NDVI and LST, together with the positive association between NDVI and rainfall, confirms the critical role of forest cover in regulating surface energy balance and maintaining ecological stability.
Overall, the study underscores the vulnerability of Eastern Himalayan forests to interacting with climatic and human pressures and highlights the value of integrating long-term remote sensing indicators with climatic data for understanding ecosystem dynamics. Such integrative approaches are essential for developing effective conservation strategies, enhancing ecosystem resilience, and supporting sustainable land-use planning in climate-sensitive mountain landscapes.
A
A
A
References
1.
Aymonier C et al (2010) Forest degradation and land-use change in Northeast India. Environ Manage 45:123–135
2.
Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1449
3.
Chapin FS, Randerson JT, McGuire AD, Foley JA, Field CB (2008) Changing feedbacks in the climate–biosphere system. Front Ecol Environ 6:313–320
4.
Chander G, Markham BL (2003) Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and post-calibration dynamic ranges. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41:2674–2677
5.
Conover WJ (1999) Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
A
6.
Dash SS et al (2007) Climate variability and forest dynamics in northeast India. Curr Sci 93:159–163
A
7.
FAO (2020) Shifting cultivation, livelihood and food security in Northeast India. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
8.
FSI (2021) India State of Forest Report 2021. Forest Survey of India, Dehradun
A
9.
Gadgil M, Guha R (1995) Ecology and Equity: The Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India. Penguin Books, New Delhi
10.
Hazarika S (2000) Strangers of the Mist: Tales of War and Peace from India’s Northeast. Penguin Books, New Delhi
A
11.
IMD (2020) Climate of Arunachal Pradesh. India Meteorological Department, New Delhi
A
12.
IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
A
13.
Jensen JR (2005) Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River
A
14.
Jiménez-Muñoz JC, Sobrino JA, Skoković D, Mattar C, Cristóbal J (2014) Land surface temperature retrieval methods from Landsat-8 thermal infrared sensor data. Remote Sens Environ 140:36–47
A
15.
Kalnay E, Cai M (2003) Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature 423:528–531
A
16.
Kendall MG (1975) Rank Correlation Methods, 4th edn. Charles Griffin, London
A
17.
Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical Ecology (3rd English ed.). Elsevier, Amsterdam
A
18.
Lu D, Mausel P, Brondízio E, Moran E (2004) Change detection techniques. Remote Sens Environ 87:456–469
A
19.
Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259
A
20.
Mildrexler DJ, Zhao M, Running SW (2011) A global comparison between station air temperatures and MODIS land surface temperatures reveals the cooling role of forests. J Phys Res 116:G03010
A
21.
Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR (1997) Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386:698–702
A
22.
Pai DS, Sridhar L, Badwaik MR, Rajeevan M (2014) Analysis of daily rainfall events over India using a new long-period gridded rainfall dataset. Clim Dyn 42:987–1004
A
23.
Pandit MK, Manish K, Koh LP (2014) Dancing on the roof of the world: Ecological transformation of the Himalaya landscape. Bioscience 64:980–992
A
24.
Peng S, Piao S, Ciais P et al (2014) Afforestation in China cools local land surface temperature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 2915–2919
A
25.
Pettorelli N (2013) The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI): A Tool for Ecological Monitoring. Oxford University Press, Oxford
A
26.
Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard JM, Tucker CJ, Stenseth NC (2005) Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol 20:503–510
A
27.
Ramakrishnan PS (1992) Shifting Agriculture and Sustainable Development: An Interdisciplinary Study from North-Eastern India. UNESCO, Paris
A
28.
Roy DP et al (2014) Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sens Environ 145:154–172
A
29.
Roychowdhury A (1992) Land Use and Forest Degradation in Arunachal Pradesh. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi
30.
Singh S et al (2017) River dynamics and landscape evolution in Eastern Himalayas. Geomorphology 295:345–357
A
31.
Snyder WC, Wan Z, Zhang Y, Feng YZ (1998) Classification-based emissivity for land surface temperature measurement. Remote Sens Environ 65:245–260
A
32.
Sobrino JA, Jiménez-Muñoz JC, Paolini L (2008) Land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat TM 5. Remote Sens Environ 112:2316–2326
A
33.
Tripathi RS, Barik SK (2003) Shifting cultivation in northeast India: Ecological and policy issues. Mt Res Dev 23:63–69
A
34.
Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ 8:127–150
35.
Van de Griend AA, Owe M (1993) On the relationship between thermal emissivity and the normalized difference vegetation index for natural surfaces. Int J Remote Sens 14:1119–1131
A
36.
Weng Q (2009) Thermal infrared remote sensing for urban climate and environmental studies. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens 64:335–344
A
37.
Weng Q, Lu D, Schubring J (2004) Estimation of land surface temperature–vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies. Remote Sens Environ 89:467–483
A
38.
Wilks DS (2011) Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, 3rd edn. Academic, San Diego
A
39.
Zhou L, Tucker CJ, Kaufmann RK, Slayback D, Shabanov NV, Myneni RB (2016) Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data. J Geophys Research: Biogeosciences 121:2164–2180
Total words in MS: 5410
Total words in Title: 14
Total words in Abstract: 272
Total Keyword count: 8
Total Images in MS: 14
Total Tables in MS: 6
Total Reference count: 39