SORPTION–SPECTROSCOPIC DETERMINATION OF CHROMIUM (III) IONS USING ERIOCHROME BLACK T IMMOBILIZED ON SILK FIBROIN FIBER
1National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 100174, Uzbekistan
Zulaykho Smanova1, Khilola Usmanova2, Muattar Mamedova3, Ayjamal Turambetova1, Nazira Madusmanova4, Muborak Abdullayeva5, Ulugbek Akhmadjonov6, Go`zal Yunusova7, Feruza Tojiboyeva8, Mavjuda Rakhmatullaeva8, Dilrabo Muhammadiyeva8
2Department of General Tactics and Operative Art, University of Public Security of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent
3Tashkent State Agrarian University, Tashkent region, 111218, Uzbekistan
4Almalyk State Technical University, Almalyk, 110100, Uzbekistan,
5 Faculty of Biology, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 100174 6Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Tashkent, 100011, Uzbekistan
7 Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Tashkent, 100011, Uzbekistan
8Tashkent Pharmaceutical Institute, 100015 Tashkent, Uzbekistan
e-mail: 1smanova.chem@mail.ru,, 2xilola02031972@gmail.com, 3tojiboyevaferuza82@gmail.com, 1a.turambetova@mail.ru, 4nazira.imomova@mail.ru, 5muborakabdullayeva1956@gmail.com, 6toferuza092@gmail.com, 7ermatova1212@mail.ru, 8tojiboyevaferuza030@gmail.com, 8raxmatullayevamavjuda031@gmail.com 8dilrabo68@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
A sorption–spectrophotometric method for the determination of chromium (III) ions was developed using Eriochrome Black T (EBT) immobilized on silk fibroin fiber. Immobilization markedly enhanced the method’s stability, sensitivity, and selectivity. Complex formation was confirmed by FT-IR spectroscopy (Cr–O band at 607 cm⁻¹), X-ray fluorescence analysis (clear Cr peak), and SEM-EDS (≈ 20 wt % Cr in the complex).
Optimal conditions were pH 8, λ = 618 nm, and a universal buffer. The detection limit was 1.2 µg L⁻¹; analysis time, 10 min; calibration linearity, R² = 0.9991 for 5–50 µg Cr(III). Average absorbance at 50 µg was 0.273, and Sandell sensitivity 0.00279 µg cm⁻².
Selectivity testing showed that Ni²⁺, Fe³⁺, and Cu²⁺ caused no interference, whereas Al³⁺, Co²⁺, and Cd²⁺ interferences were masked effectively. Validation with industrial wastewater (Navoi Electrochemical Plant, Mubarek Gas Processing Plant, Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex) gave relative errors ≤ 6% and Sr ≤ 0.085.
The method therefore offers an economical, rapid, and accurate tool for monitoring Cr(III) ions in environmental waters, suitable for both field and laboratory applications.
KEYWORDS:
Eriochrome Black T
immobilization
fibroin fiber
sorption–spectroscopic method
chromium
A
1. Introduction
The development of effective methods for the separation and determination of chromium, particularly in water and soil, is a pressing issue in both analytical chemistry and environmental science. Chromium is an important element widely used in metallurgy, dye production, leather tanning, wood preservation, and various industrial processes. Its compounds are released into the environment through industrial emissions, wastewater, and solid waste, leading to contamination of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems [1, 2].
Chromium exists in several oxidation states, with trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) and hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) being the most stable. Cr(III) plays a role in various physiological processes, including carbohydrate metabolism, enzyme activation, and the regulation of glucose and insulin levels [3, 4]. However, even Cr(III), in excess, can cause oxidative damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA [4]. In contrast, Cr(VI) is highly toxic and carcinogenic, with the ability to penetrate cell membranes [5].
Heavy metals, including chromium, are classified as systemic toxicants and are recognized as priority pollutants by the EPA and IARC due to their potential to harm internal organs even at low concentrations [6]. The main routes of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) exposure include inhalation, dermal contact, and ingestion of contaminated water or food [7, 8]. Particular concern arises from contamination of surface soil and dust in industrial areas, where heavy metals can accumulate and pose risks to human health [8].
Modern analytical techniques for chromium determination include atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), ion chromatography, voltammetry, fluorescent probes, and spectrophotometric methods [9, 10]. Although AAS and ICP-MS offer high sensitivity, their use is often limited by high equipment costs and the need for complex sample preparation. Spectrophotometric methods employing organic reagents remain popular due to their affordability and simplicity, though they frequently fall short in terms of sensitivity and selectivity [9].
A
One promising approach to overcoming these limitations is the use of immobilized organic reagents, which enhance the sensitivity, selectivity, and stability of the analytical signal. Immobilization on solid supports prevents reagent leaching, extends operational lifespan, and enables multiple reuses [11, 12]. Such systems are particularly effective in sorption–spectrophotometric analysis and allow for the determination of target ions over a wide pH range with improved detection limits. The application of various polymeric carriers – such as polyacrylonitrile, silica gel, polyethylene glycol, and others – ensures compatibility with aqueous media and resistance to harsh environmental conditions.
Modern methods for the analysis of Cr(III) in various matrices (water, soil, plants, and biomaterials) are summarized in Table 1, which presents detection limits, sorbents used, and analytical conditions [1336].
A
A
Table 1
Determination of Cr(III) in various samples
Sample
Analytical method
Sorbent / pH; LOD
Ref.
1
Water, soil
Microplatform analysis
0.003–0.07 ppm
[13]
2
Water
ICP-AES
Silica gel
[14]
3
Water, plants
Ion chromatography–ICP-MS
0.09 and 0.03 µg/L
[15]
4
Water
FAAS
Magnetic graphene oxide, pH 2–3; 0.1 µg/L
[16]
5
Medicinal plants
ICP-AES
0.26–3.12 mg/kg
[17]
6
Water
Spectrophotometry
≈ 0.01 µg/mL
[18]
7
LA-ICP-MS
2.22 µg/g
[19]
8
Water, soil
Modified hydrothermal method
Synthetic pyrite, pH = 4–6
[20]
9
Water, soil
Sorption
CMC–FeS, pH = 5.6; 0.005 mg/L
[21]
10
Water, soil
Sorption
Biochar (EBB), pH = 1–2
[22]
11
Water
Adsorption
PACB; 6.207 mg/g
[23]
12
Water
Adsorption
CFA; 85.83 mg/g
[24]
13
Water, soil
Biochar (citrus peel); 100 mg/g
[25]
14
Beetroot, water
HPLC–DAD & ICP-MS
[26]
15
Soil, plants, water
Spectrophotometry, VSHX–IPS–OES
0.05 mg/kg
[27]
16
Blood
Spectrophotometry, ICP-MS
0.13–0.14 µg/kg
[28]
17
Extraction, LC–ICP–MS
pH = 8; 0.51 µg
[29]
18
Wood
Spectroscopy
CCA, pH = 9
[30]
19
Spectrophotometry, UV–vis
0.05 µg/kg
[31]
20
Water
AuNPs, pH = 8; 0.9 µM
[32]
21
Water
Electrochemistry
PRu/CB–Chi/GCE; 0.016 nM
[33]
22
Water
Hydrothermal, QDs
L–Asp–CdS; 1 µM
[34]
23
Water
UV–VIS
AuNPs, pH = 5; 0.035–0.051 ppm
[35]
24
Water
Spectrophotometry
pH = 2.5–3.0; 0.012 µg/mL
[36]
Table 2 systematizes the organic reagents used for the photometric analysis of chromium, including analytical conditions and detection limits.
Table 2
Organic reagents for the determination of chromium
Reagent
Medium
Detection limit
Method
Ref.
EDTA
pH = 6.4
8.27 µg
Spectrophotometry
[37]
4-(2-thiazolylazo)-resorcinol
pH = 5.7
17 ng/mL
Spectrophotometry
[38]
EDTA
pH = 2.5–4.5
1.0 mg/L
Spectrophotometry
[39]
1,5-diphenylcarbazide
pH = 6.7–7.3
0.01 µg/L
Spectrophotometry
[40]
Ammonium sulfate eluent
pH = 3.5
0.5 µg/L
Chromatography
[41]
Triton-X114 and cetylbromide methyl
pH = 2.5
0.02 ng/L
OES
[42]
EDTA
pH = 5
11.4 mg/g
OES
[43]
Aminopolycarboxylic acid
pH = 7
0.2 µg/L
ICP-MS
[44]
In the present study, Eriochrome Black T (EBT) was selected as the organic reagent due to its ability to form colored complexes with Cr(III) ions. EBT is an azo dye containing functional groups capable of coordinating with metal cations – primarily a phenolic hydroxyl group and an azo group. These donor centers enable strong binding with Cr(III) in the presence of an appropriate buffer. The sulfonic acid group does not participate in complex formation but enhances the water solubility of the reagent and facilitates its effective immobilization on a polymeric carrier. Due to its selectivity, stability, and compatibility with solid-phase systems, EBT was chosen in this study as the reagent for the sorption–spectrophotometric determination of Cr(III) ions. The chemical structure of the reagent is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Structural and electronic formula of Eriochrome Black T
Click here to Correct
The aim of this study is to develop a sensitive and selective sorption–spectrophotometric method for the determination of Cr(III) ions using EBT immobilized on silk fibroin fiber.
2. Experimental part
2.1. Instrumentation
Optical density measurements of the solutions before and after immobilization were carried out using EMC-30PC-UV-1800 and UV-5100 UV-VIS spectrophotometers, which enabled quantification of the immobilized reagent. Absorption and reflectance spectra were recorded with an X-Rite eye-one-pro mini-spectrophotometer (Russia).
UV spectra of complexes formed between the organic reagent EBT and metal ions were registered using a Bruker Invenio S-2021 FT-IR spectrometer (Germany). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were performed using a Jeol JSM-IT200LA scanning electron microscope (Japan).
X-ray fluorescence analysis was performed on a Rigaku NEX CG EDXRF Analyzer with Polarization (No. 9022190000, Japan). The pH values of the solutions were measured using a pH-12.mV TEMP Meter R 25 (Korea).
2.2. Reagents and solutions
All chemical reagents, including chromium(III) chloride hexahydrate (CrCl₃•6H₂O), EBT, and buffer components, were obtained from “Khimreaktivinvest” LLC (Tashkent, Uzbekistan) and had a minimum purity of 99.8%. All solutions were prepared using double-distilled water.
A standard Cr(III) solution (1.0 × 10⁻³ mol/L) was prepared by dissolving 0.266 g of CrCl₃•6H₂O (molar mass 266.44 g/mol) in a small volume of distilled water, followed by dilution to 1.0 L in a volumetric flask. Working solutions with lower concentrations were prepared by serial dilution.
The EBT reagent solution (structural formula: C₂₀H₁₂N₃O₇SNa, Mr = 461.381 g/mol) was prepared by dissolving 0.004613 g of the substance in 100 mL of distilled water, yielding a concentration of 1.0 × 10⁻⁵ mol/L. The solution remains stable for up to one month when stored in a dark, tightly sealed container.
A universal buffer solution was prepared from phosphoric (H₃PO₄), acetic (CH₃COOH), and boric (H₃BO₃) acids. To prepare 1 L of a 0.04 M buffer, 2.2 mL of H₃PO₄, 3.5 mL of CH₃COOH, and 2.48 g of H₃BO₃ were added to a volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with distilled water. After 5–10 minutes, the pH of the solution was measured using a Mettler Toledo pH meter and found to be pH = 1.81. To obtain buffers with different pH values, calculated volumes of 0.2 M NaOH were added to this solution according to published recommendations [145].
An acetate buffer solution with a pH range of 3.8–6.3 was prepared by mixing 1 N acetic acid (from 421.5 to 59.3 mL) with the appropriate volume of 1 N NaOH solution, depending on the required pH.
2.3. Preparation procedure for immobilized reagents
At the initial stage, various fibrous sorbents were tested, and materials with optimal values of static and dynamic ion exchange capacities (SIEC and DIEC, mg-eq/g) were selected for further study as solid-phase carriers.
To evaluate the dynamic ion exchange capacity, a known amount of sorbent was placed in a column with a diameter of 10 mm. A 1.0 M hydrochloric acid solution was passed through the column at a constant flow rate. After saturation, the column was rinsed with distilled water until the pH reached approximately 7. Then, 25 mL of the eluate was titrated with a 0.1 M NaOH solution using methyl orange as an indicator.
Immobilization of the organic reagent EBT onto the selected fibrous carrier – silk fibroin – was performed under static conditions. Fiber samples with a diameter of 2 cm and a mass of 0.2 g were placed into a beaker containing 50 mL of 0.1 M HCl solution to convert them to the Cl⁻ form. After multiple rinses with distilled water, the fibers were transferred into 50 mL of an EBT solution with a concentration of 1.0 × 10⁻⁵ mol/L.
Immobilization was carried out at room temperature for 5–24 hours. Upon completion, the fibers were removed using a glass rod, rinsed twice with 50 mL portions of distilled water, and stored moist in a Petri dish.
The amount of unbound (free) reagent remaining in the solution was determined via UV transmittance spectroscopy, while the content of EBT immobilized on the fiber was measured using diffuse reflectance with a reflectance spectrophotometer.
2.4. Procedure for complex formation of immobilized EBT with Cr(III) Ions
For the sorption preconcentration of Cr(III) ions, sample solutions with volumes ranging from 10 to 200 mL were passed through a microcolumn containing 0.2 g of immobilized EBT reagent on a silk fibroin matrix. Sorption was carried out at a constant flow rate of 1–10 mL/min at room temperature.
The optimal pH values were determined experimentally to ensure maximum extraction efficiency of Cr(III) from the aqueous phase. Throughout the procedure, the flow rate was maintained constant to ensure the reproducibility of results.
2.5. Procedure for the determination of Cr(III) Ions
For the analysis, an aliquot of solution containing 5–50 µg/mL of Cr(III) was transferred into a 25 mL volumetric flask. To the sample, 5 mL of a 0.005 M aqueous solution of the sodium salt of EBT and 10 mL of a universal buffer solution (pH = 8.0) were added to ensure optimal complexation conditions.
The volume was adjusted to the mark with distilled water. Five minutes after preparation, the absorbance of the samples was measured using EMC-30PC-UV-1800 and UVS-755 B spectrophotometers, with standard quartz or glass cuvettes of 1 cm optical path length.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Immobilization of EBT
Seven polymeric materials were investigated as solid-phase supports for the immobilization of EBT, including three anion-exchange fibers of the SMA series, a granular sorbent (PPM-1), two polyacrylonitrile-based fibers (PPA and PPF), and modified silk fibroin. The amino groups introduced via ethylenediamine, hydroxylamine, or hexamethylenediamine (SMA-1/-2/-3), as well as polyethylene polyamine (PPA) and phosphinyl groups (PPF), enable ion-exchange or hydrogen-bond interactions with EBT. Fibroin, composed mainly of Gly, Ala, Tyr, and Ser residues, contains sufficient –NH₂ and –OH functionalities for dye sorption. Silk fibroin showed the best performance (Table 3) (A ≈ 0.32; fixation efficiency ≈ 88%), as confirmed by reflectance spectra in Kubelka–Munk coordinates (Fig. 2). The high sorption capacity is attributed to the combination of hydrophilic (–OH, –NH₂) and hydrophobic regions in the protein matrix.
Table 3
Dependence of Optical Density of Immobilized EBT on the Nature of the Carrier
Type of
Carrier
AEBT
(UV-1800 UV)
AEBT
(EMC-30PC-UV)
 
1
SMA-1
0.214
0.213
2
SMA-2
0.029
0.030
3
SMA-3
0.034
0.033
4
PPM-1
0.232
0.231
5
Fibroin
0.320
0.319
6
PPA
0.276
0.274
Fig. 2
Reflectance spectra in Kubelka–Munk coordinates for the immobilization of EBT on various fiber carriers.
Click here to Correct
Silk fibroin was selected as the optimal support for subsequent stages, including complex formation with Cr(III), optimization of analytical conditions, and evaluation of the method’s analytical performance.
.
3.2. Complex formation of immobilized EBT with Cr(III) ions
3.2.1. Selection of Buffer Medium
Into 25 mL volumetric flasks, 5.0 mL of aqueous solutions of 0.01% EBT and Cr(III) metal ions were added. Various buffer solutions with known pH values were then introduced, and the volume was brought to the mark with double-distilled water. The absorbance of the resulting solutions was measured relative to standard blank solutions at wavelengths λmax = 508 and 618 nm (Cr(III)–EBT complex, cuvette path length l = 1.0 cm).
Based on the obtained results, the universal buffer was identified as the optimal medium and was used in all subsequent analyses. In the next stage, 2.0 mL of a Cr(III) solution (50 µg/mL), a 0.001% solution of EBT sodium salt, and 10 mL of buffer solution at varying pH were added to a 25 mL volumetric flask. The volume was adjusted to the mark with distilled water. The absorbance of the resulting solutions was measured against a blank. The results are presented in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3
Effect of the Added Buffer Solution on the Complex Formation Between Cr(III) and EBT
Click here to Correct
The analysis results indicate that the most effective complex formation between 2.0 mL of Cr(III) solution (50 µg/mL) and 0.001% solution of the EBT reagent salt occurs in a universal buffer solution at pH 7–8. This buffer system was therefore used in all subsequent experiments.
3.2.2. Optimization of reaction time
To determine the minimum time required for the formation of a stable complex between Cr(III) ions and the immobilized EBT reagent, a series of experiments was conducted. Each sample received 2.0 mL of Cr(III) solution (50 µg/mL) and was mixed with the immobilized EBT at pH 7–8. The absorbance at λ = 508 nm was measured every 30 seconds.
Analysis of the absorbance curve showed that a plateau was reached after 5 minutes at a temperature of 20 ± 5°C. Extending the reaction time beyond this interval did not lead to any significant changes in the optical signal, indicating completion of the complexation process. Therefore, the optimal interaction time between Cr(III) ions and immobilized EBT was established as 5 minutes.
3.2.3. Effect of Reagent Volume
To determine the optimal amount of the organic reagent EBT at a fixed Cr(III) ion concentration (50 µg/mL), the volume of a 0.001% EBT solution was varied from 0.5 to 3.5 mL under pH conditions of 7–8. The absorbance of the resulting complex was measured at λ = 508 nm.
As shown in Table 4, absorbance increased with the volume of EBT up to 2.0 mL, after which it plateaued. This indicates that beyond this point, the added reagent exceeds the amount needed for full complexation, leaving excess EBT unbound. Therefore, the optimal reagent volume was determined to be 2.0 mL, corresponding to a concentration of 1 × 10⁻⁵ mol/L in the system.
Table 4
Effect of EBT Volume on Complex Absorbance (λ = 508 nm, pH = 7–8, ℓ = 1 cm)
VEBT, мл
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
Ȧ (Absorbance)
0,085
0,158
0,269
0,325
0,305
0,252
0,201
Table 5 summarizes the optimal conditions for the complexation reaction between immobilized EBT and Cr(III) ions.
Table 5
Optimal Conditions for the Complexation of Immobilized EBT with Cr(III) Ions
Parameter
Optimal Conditions
Buffer solution
Universal buffer
pH
7–8
Reaction time
5 minutes
Volume of 0.001% EBT
2.0 mL (1 × 10⁻⁵ M)
Measurement wavelength
508 nm
These optimized conditions were used for the calibration curve and to evaluate the analytical characteristics of the method.
3.3. Determination of the composition of the Cr(III)–EBT complex by the method of equimolar series (Ostromisslensky–Job’s method)
To determine the stoichiometric ratio of components in the Cr(III)–EBT complex, the method of equimolar series (Ostromisslensky–Job method) was employed. Solutions of Cr(III) ions and EBT reagent were prepared at equal molar concentrations (1 × 10⁻⁵ M). Into 25 mL volumetric flasks, 0.2000 g of silk fibroin fiber with immobilized EBT was placed. Then, varying volumes of Cr(III) and EBT solutions (from 1.0 to 9.0 mL, with a total volume of 10 mL) were added in reverse proportion, along with 10 mL of universal buffer solution (pH = 7–8). The volume was adjusted to the mark with distilled water. After 10–15 minutes of sorption, the absorbance was measured using an EMC-30PC-UV spectrophotometer against a blank solution.
Based on the resulting data (Fig. 4), the maximum absorbance is observed at a Cr³⁺ : EBT ratio of 1:1, indicating the formation of a 1:1 stoichiometric complex.
Fig. 4
Determination of the composition of the Cr(III)–EBT complex using the Ostromisslensky–Job method (sorbent: silk fibroin).
Click here to Correct
3.4. Determination of the true molar absorptivity and stability constant of the Cr(III) complex by the Tolmachev method
The Tolmachev graphical method was applied to determine key characteristics of the complexation reaction between Cr(III) ions and the immobilized reagent EBT, namely, the true molar absorptivity (ε) and the stability constant (Kₛ). The reaction can be described by the following stoichiometric equation:
HR + Me³⁺ → [MeR]²⁺ + 2H⁺
Solutions of Cr(III) and the immobilized reagent in stoichiometric ratios were added to 25 mL volumetric flasks along with a universal buffer (pH = 7–8), and diluted to the mark with distilled water. Absorbance values were recorded under optimal conditions before and after sorption. The experimental results are summarized in Table 6.
Table 6
Determination of the molar absorptivity of the Cr(III)–EBT complex
V_Cr (mL)
V_HR (mL)
Ā
√A
1/√A
C_Cr³⁺·10⁻⁵ (mol/L)
1/ε·10⁻⁵
 
1
0.5
0.5
0.041
0.192
4.89
5.2
4.60
2
1.0
1.0
0.092
0.301
3.52
5.8
3.19
3
1.5
1.5
0.144
0.382
2.81
6.0
2.92
4
2.0
2.0
0.196
0.441
2.38
6.4
2.18
5
2.5
2.5
0.251
0.499
2.01
6.8
1.94
Based on the linear relationship between 1/√A and C_Cr, the slope (tg α) was determined:
tg α = a / b = (2.02 × 10⁻⁵) / 2.6 = 0.731 × 10⁻⁵
The true molar absorptivity of the Cr(III)–EBT complex was calculated as:
ε_true = 1 / (0.8 × 10⁻⁵) = 1.26 × 10⁵ L·mol⁻¹·cm⁻¹
The stability constant (Kₛ) was estimated using the following formula:
Kₛ = (CHn × ℓⁿ) / (nⁿ × ε × bⁿ⁺¹) = 1.49 × 10¹¹
These results confirm that the developed method exhibits high sensitivity (ε > 10⁵) and yields a moderately stable complex.
3.4. Spectral characteristics of the immobilized EBT–Cr(III) complex
3.4.1. Absorption and reflectance spectra of complexes formed by immobilized reagents with Cr(III) ions
The absorption and reflectance spectra of the complex formed between the immobilized reagent and Cr(III) ions were analyzed. A 25 mL volumetric flask was filled sequentially with 2.0 mL of a 0.001% aqueous solution of EBT, 5.0 mL of a universal buffer at pH 8.0, and 1.0 mL of Cr(III) ion solution. The volume was adjusted to the mark with distilled water, thoroughly mixed, and after 5 minutes the absorption spectrum was recorded using a UV-1800 spectrophotometer with a 1 cm quartz cuvette. The maximum absorption wavelength of free EBT was observed at λR = 508 nm, and the maximum for the Cr(III)–EBT complex was at λcpx = 618 nm. The spectral contrast (Δλ = 110 nm) enables clear differentiation between the reagent and complex peaks (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5
Absorption spectra of EBT (1) and its complex with chromium ions (2).
Click here to Correct
To verify the accuracy of the results, the obtained absorption spectra were compared with the reflectance spectra in the solid phase. The minimum in the reflectance spectrum coincided with the maximum in the absorption spectrum. When the reflectance spectra were transformed using the Kubelka–Munk function, the minimum was converted into a maximum, matching the absorption spectrum maximum (Figs. 6 and 7), confirming the reliability of measurements in both transmittance and reflectance modes.
Fig. 6
Reflectance spectra transformed via the Kubelka–Munk function (F/R).
Click here to Correct
This transformation highlights changes in the optical properties of the fiber surface during reagent immobilization and complex formation, confirming the successful binding of Cr³⁺ ions. The decrease in reflectance and the shift in spectral features upon complexation are indicative of electronic interactions and formation of a new chromophore system.
Fig. 7
Dependence of the reflectance coefficient (according to the Kubelka–Munk function) on composition: initial fiber, fiber with EBT reagent, immobilized fiber, and Cr(III) complex.
Click here to Correct
3.4.2. Beer–Lambert–Bouguer law
To assess the degree of reagent immobilization and confirm compliance with the Beer–Lambert–Bouguer Law (BLL), carriers were immersed in a beaker containing 10 mL of a 0.02% solution of the reagent – EBT, and stirred for 10–12 minutes using a magnetic stirrer.
The optical densities of the solutions before and after immobilization were measured using EMC-30PC-UV and UV-5100 UV-VIS spectrophotometers. A linear relationship was established between the Cr(III) ion concentration and absorbance in the range of 5 to 50 µg, confirming the applicability of BLL under the selected experimental conditions. The calibration equation obtained was:
A = 0.0059 × C + 0.0016 (R² = 0.9955),
where A is the absorbance and C is the Cr(III) concentration in µg.
3.4.3. Molar absorptivity
The molar absorptivity (ε) at the absorption maximum of the complex (λ = 618 nm) was calculated as
ε = A / (C × l) = 0.715 / (1×10⁻⁶ × 1) = 71,500 L·mol⁻¹·cm⁻¹
where A is absorbance, C is Cr(III) ion concentration (mol/L), and l is the optical path length (cm).
3.4.4. Sandell’s sensitivity
Based on the experimental data, the Sandell sensitivity (S.b.s.) was calculated using:
S.b.s = (Q × l × 0.001) / (A × 25) = (50 × 1.0 × 0.001) / (0.715 × 25) = 0.00279 µg/cm²
Thus, the Sandell sensitivity of the method is 0.00279 µg/cm², which, together with the high spectral contrast (Δλ = 110 nm), confirms the high sensitivity of the proposed method for Cr(III) determination.
The spectral characteristics of the Cr(III)–EBT complex are summarized in Table 7.
Table 7
Spectral Characteristics of the Cr(III)–EBT Complex (ℓ = 1.0 cm; C₍Cr³⁺₎ = 50 µg/mL)
Complex Color
pH
λ₍HR₎,
nm
λ₍MR₎,
nm
Δλ,
nm
C₍Cr³⁺₎,
µg
Sandell Sensitivity,
µg/cm²
Blue
7–8
508
618
110
50
0.00279
3.5. Quantum chemical modeling of the structure and properties of the Cr(III) complex with immobilized EBT Reagent
To interpret the analytical activity and the nature of chemical bonding in the Cr(III) complex with immobilized EBT reagent, quantum chemical calculations were performed in the ground state using the Gaussian 09 software package. The calculations employed density functional theory (DFT) with the B3LYP hybrid functional and the 6-311G basis set.
Based on the calculation results, the electron density was determined for the key functional groups of EBT that play an essential role in both immobilization and complexation processes (Table 8).
Table 8
Electron density on functional groups of EBT based on Gaussian 09 modeling results
Functional
Group
Electron
Density
–SO₃H
1.102
–N = N–
1.073
–NO₂
1.069
–C–O– (1)
0.504
–C–O– (2)
0.518
–OH (1)
0.373
–OH (2)
0.261
Other (minor)
0.119–0.085
The highest electron density values were observed for the sulfonic group (–SO₃H) and the azo group (–N = N–), indicating their key role in the formation of a stable complex with Cr(III) ions.
The sulfonic group (–SO₃H) exhibited the highest electron density, pointing to its active involvement in intermolecular interactions, particularly in the immobilization of the reagent on the hydrophilic surface of the fiber. High electron density values for the azo (–N = N–), nitro (–NO₂), hydroxyl, and ether groups also indicate the presence of multiple donor centers capable of coordinating with Cr³⁺ ions.
To visualize the charge distribution within the EBT molecule, an electrostatic potential surface (ESP) was constructed, as shown in Fig. 8.
Fig. 8
Electrostatic potential (ESP) map of the EBT reagent molecule.
Click here to Correct
Additionally, bond lengths between the key functional groups responsible for the molecule's reactivity were calculated. Figure 9 presents the bond length values, confirming the spatial structure and the potential for complex formation.
Fig. 9
Calculated bond lengths in the EBT molecule.
Click here to Correct
On the ESP map, red areas correspond to regions of highest electron density (electron-rich zones, minima), while blue areas indicate regions of lowest electron density (electron-deficient zones, maxima). These regions represent potential donor and acceptor sites involved in coordination reactions.
For a more detailed analysis, the values of the frontier molecular orbitals were also calculated – HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) and LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital), which determine the molecule’s ability to donate and accept electrons, respectively. Figure 10 shows the distribution of electron density for the HOMO and LUMO orbitals in the EBT molecule.
Fig. 10
(a) The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of EBT; (b) The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of EBT.
Click here to Correct
The HOMO electron density is primarily distributed over the azo group and hydroxyl groups, indicating a high likelihood of their involvement in coordination with Cr³⁺ ions. Although the sulfonic acid group (–SO₃H) exhibits high electron density, it does not participate in complex formation. Instead, it plays a crucial role in reagent immobilization through interactions with the hydrophilic regions of the fibroin carrier. Meanwhile, the LUMO localization indicates potential electron-accepting regions within the molecule that are involved in electronic transitions during the formation of the chromium complex.
3.6. IR spectroscopic investigation of the EBT–Cr(III) complex
To confirm the formation of a complex between the reagent EBT, immobilized on silk fibroin fibers, and chromium(III) ions, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was employed.
A
Silk fibroin fiber obtained from the production waste of the “Urganch TEX” company was used as the solid-phase carrier. IR spectra were recorded for the native silk fiber, the fiber with immobilized EBT reagent, and the resulting complex with Cr(III) ions. Comparative IR spectra of all three samples are presented in Fig. 11.
.
Click here to download actual image
Figure 11. IR spectra of the complex formed by silk fibroin fiber, EBT reagent, and Cr(III) ion.
Spectral analysis revealed the characteristic vibrational bands: stretching vibrations of –OH groups in the range of 3276–3279 cm⁻¹; C–H bands at 2975–2976 cm⁻¹; –CH = N– vibrations at 1616–1618 cm⁻¹; N = N group bands between 1375 and 1437 cm⁻¹; stretching vibrations of the –SO₃⁻ group in the range of 1066–1164 cm⁻¹; and a new band around 607 cm⁻¹ corresponding to Cr–O coordination bonds, which confirms the formation of a chelate complex between the reagent and the Cr(III) ion. The observed frequencies are summarized in Table 9.
Table 9
IR Spectroscopic Characteristics of the Complex Formed by Silk Fibroin Fiber, EBT Reagent, and Cr(III) Ion
Functional Groups (FFG, AAG)
Silk fibroin fiber ν, cm⁻¹
IMEBT cm⁻¹
IMEBT + Cr³⁺ cm⁻¹
–CH = N–
1616.09
1618.00
1618.37
–OH
3275.86
3276.84
3278.75
–N = N–
1375.69
1437.02
–SO₃⁻
1066.32
1164.32
–O–Na
545.62
–NO₂
1333.02
1335.73
1314.85
–O–Cr
607.51
–C–H–
2976.11
2975.62
2976.35
The presence of a distinct band at 607 cm⁻¹ in the complex spectrum confirms the formation of a Cr–O coordination bond. Shifts in the –CH = N–, –N = N–, and –NO₂ bands, as well as changes in the intensity of other characteristic vibrations, indicate the involvement of these functional groups in the chelation with Cr³⁺. Meanwhile, the minimal changes observed in the –SO₃⁻ bands suggest their primary role is in reagent immobilization on the fibroin fiber rather than in metal coordination.
3.7. X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of the EBT–Cr(III) Complex
To confirm the composition of the resulting complex and to identify the functional groups involved in immobilization and complexation, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis was carried out on three samples: raw silk fibroin fiber, fiber with immobilized EBT reagent, and the EBT–Cr(III) complex.
Based on the obtained XRF spectra, the following was established:
In the spectrum of the raw silk fibroin fiber, signals corresponding to carbon (C), oxygen (O), and nitrogen (N) were observed, which are typical for the proteinaceous nature of the material (see Figure. 12A). After immobilization of EBT, a characteristic sulfur (S) peak appeared, confirming the presence of the –SO₃H functional group in the reagent, which participates in binding to the carrier (see Fig. 12B). In the spectrum of the complex formed after the introduction of Cr(III) ions, a distinct peak corresponding to chromium (Cr) was detected, clearly indicating the formation of a chelate complex with the immobilized reagent (see Fig. 12C).
In addition, a decrease in the intensity of the chlorine (Cl) signal was noted in the modified fiber after immobilization, which may be associated with the displacement of Cl⁻ ions from salt forms and their substitution during complexation via the –SO₃H group.
The obtained results are fully consistent with the IR spectroscopy and quantum chemical modeling data, confirming the formation of a stable complex based on EBT and Cr³⁺ ions on the silk fibroin surface.
Click here to Correct
.
A)
Fig. 12
IR spectra: A) XRF spectrum of silk fibroin fiber; B) XRF spectrum of fibroin fiber with immobilized EBT reagent; C) XRF spectrum of the fibroin + EBT + Cr(III) complex.
Click here to Correct
3.8. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis
To investigate the morphological and elemental characteristics of the complex formed between the immobilized EBT reagent and Cr(III) ions on silk fibroin fibers, scanning electron microscopy combined with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) was conducted.
Figure 13A shows the SEM image of the fiber surface with immobilized EBT reagent prior to interaction with metal ions, while Fig. 13B presents the morphological changes observed after the formation of the Cr(III) complex. Visible alterations in surface texture indicate sorption and chelation processes occurring at the phase interface.
The elemental composition of the analyzed samples is summarized in Table 9. Before modification, the fiber contains carbon (C), nitrogen (N), oxygen (O), phosphorus (P), and sulfur (S). After acid activation, the appearance of chlorine (Cl) is noted. Following complexation, the chromium content reaches up to 20 wt%, confirming the high efficiency and selectivity of the interaction between the reagent and Cr³⁺ ions.
Table 10
SEM-EDS analysis results for the EBT–Cr(III) complex immobilized on silk fibroin fiber (n = 3, P = 0.96)
Sample
C (%)
N (%)
Cl (%)
O (%)
P (%)
S (%)
Cr (%)
Silk fibroin + EBT + Cr³⁺
38.14 ± 0.01
13.25 ± 0.02
15.81 ± 0.02
16.99 ± 0.04
1.00 ± 0.01
2.34 ± 0.02
 
Fig. 13
A) SEM image of silk fibroin fiber with immobilized EBT reagent. B) SEM image of the complex formed between EBT and Cr(III) on the surface of the fibroin fiber.
Click here to Correct
In addition, the EDS spectrum presented in Fig. 14 confirms the presence of key elements involved in complex formation. Characteristic peaks for carbon (C), oxygen (O), nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), chlorine (Cl), and chromium (Cr) are observed. The distinct Cr–Kα and Cr–Kβ peaks in the range of 5.4–5.9 keV further verify successful coordination of Cr(III) with the immobilized reagent. The intensity of these peaks is consistent with the high chromium content determined by SEM-EDS mapping (Table 10).
Fig. 14
EDS spectrum of the complex between Cr(III) ions and immobilized EBT on silk fibroin. Peaks corresponding to Cr–Kα and Cr–Kβ confirm the presence of chromium in the complex.
Click here to Correct
3.9. Analytical Parameters of the Developed Method
3.9.1. Calibration and Regression Equation
The calibration relationship between the Cr(III) concentration (in the range of 5–50 µg) and absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 618 nm, pH = 8, and an optical path length of 1.0 cm. Data processing using the least squares method yielded the following linear equation:
A = 0.0168 + 0.0071C, where A is the absorbance and C is the Cr(III) concentration in µg. The high linearity of the calibration curve is confirmed by the determination coefficient = 0.9991.
Click here to download actual image
A
Figure 15. Calibration curve showing the relationship between absorbance and Cr(III) concentration in the range of 5–50 µg. Conditions: λ = 618 nm, pH = 8, l = 1.0 cm.
3.9.2. Selectivity
The optimal pH range of 8–9 promotes the formation of a stable complex between the EBT reagent and chromium(III) ions. However, under these conditions, the presence of other metal ions may cause interference and reduce the accuracy of the analysis. Therefore, the selectivity of the proposed sorption–spectrophotometric method was evaluated.
The experimental procedure was as follows: a standard Cr(III) solution containing 40 µg was treated with the immobilized organic reagent (IOR) under optimized conditions, followed by the addition of various foreign ions in different mass ratios relative to Cr(III). The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of λ = 608 nm and a path length of l = 1.0 cm. Based on the deviations in the determined Cr(III) concentrations, conclusions were drawn regarding the presence or absence of interfering effects. The results are presented in Table 11.
Table 11
Detection of Chromium (III) Ions with EBT Reagent in the Presence of Foreign Ions (CCr3+ = 40 µg, n = 3)
Ions under study
Cr :Me mass ratio
Relative errors %
Interference
1
Ni²⁺
1:1
1:50
1:100
3.9
4.6
2.2
Does not interfere
2
Al³⁺
1:1
1:50
1:100
4.8
5.7
4.3
Interferes
3
Fe³⁺
1:1
3.4
Does not interfere
4
Mn²⁺
1:1
1:100
2.8
4.12
Interferes
5
Co²⁺
1:1
1:5
4.33
5.15
Interferes
6
Fe²⁺
1:1
1:5
4.3
4.41
Interferes
7
Cu²⁺
1:1
5.12
Does not interfere
8
Cd²⁺
1:10
1:50
3.1
4.74
Interferes
9
Mo(IV)
1:10
1:50
4.98
5.1
Interferes
Analysis of the data presented in Table 10 indicates that Ni²⁺, Fe³⁺, and Cu²⁺ ions do not cause significant interference, even at high mass ratios relative to Cr³⁺. In contrast, Al³⁺, Mn²⁺, Co²⁺, Fe²⁺, Cd²⁺, and Mo(IV) exhibit pronounced interfering effects, likely due to their ability to form competing complexes with the EBT reagent.
To enhance method selectivity and eliminate such interference, the use of fluoride ions or other masking agents is recommended. These additives selectively block interfering ions without affecting the Cr(III)–EBT complex formation.
Thus, the developed sorption–spectrophotometric method demonstrates high sensitivity (limit of detection ~ 1.2 µg/L), compliance with the Beer–Lambert–Bouguer law, and satisfactory selectivity toward Cr(III) in the presence of various competing ions. The method can be effectively applied when appropriate masking agents are employed.
4. Analytical application of the developed method
4.1. Application of the method for the analysis of industrial wastewater
To evaluate the practical applicability of the developed sorption–spectrophotometric method for determining Cr(III) ions, samples of wastewater were collected from several industrial facilities: the Navoi Electrochemical Plant (Navoi Region), the Mubarek Gas Processing Plant, and the Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex.
The analysis was performed using the standard addition method as follows: 5 mL of 0.5 M nitric acid (HNO₃) and 5 mL of universal buffer solution (pH = 8) were added to each water sample (sample volume: 2.0 mL). The solution was then passed through a carrier with the immobilized EBT reagent, after which the absorbance or reflectance spectra were recorded using a spectrophotometer.
Cr(III) ions were successfully detected in all tested samples. The results are summarized in Table 12.
Table 12
Determination of Chromium (III) Ions in Wastewater (P = 0.95; n = 3)
Sampling Site
Added (µg/L)
Found, X̅ ± ΔX̅ (µg/L)
S
Sr
1
Navoi Electrochemical Plant
1.00
0.96 ± 0.06
0.061
0.063
2
Mubarek Gas Processing Plant
2.45
2.49 ± 0.01
0.105
0.042
3
Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Plant
3.00
2.96 ± 0.063
0.252
0.085
As shown in the table, the measured concentrations closely match the added values of Cr(III) ions, confirming the accuracy and reproducibility of the proposed method for analyzing real environmental samples.
4.2. Validation of the Proposed Method
To evaluate the analytical performance of the developed sorption–spectrophotometric method for the determination of Cr(III) ions based on the immobilized reagent EBT, a validation study was conducted by comparing its parameters with those reported for other analytical methods. The validation included a comparative assessment of the limit of detection (LOD), analysis time, buffer systems used, and correlation coefficients of calibration curves. The results are presented in Table 13.
Table 13
Comparison of the Analytical Characteristics of the Proposed Method with Other Methods for Cr(III) Determination
Method
pH
LOD (µg/L)
Analysis time (min)
Correlation coefficient (R²)
Buffer system
Proposed method (sorption–spectrophotometric)
8
1.2
10
0.9991
Universal buffer
Photometric (literature data)
4
30
20
0.9908
Acetate–ammonia buffer
Polarographic
5
10
15
0.9899
0.01 M HCl
As shown in Table 12, the proposed method demonstrates superior sensitivity (LOD = 1.2 µg/L), shorter analysis time (10 minutes), and excellent linearity (R² = 0.9991) compared to conventional photometric and polarographic methods. These advantages make it a reliable and efficient tool for the determination of Cr(III) in environmental and industrial samples.
Conclusion
The immobilization of organic reagents on polymeric carriers has proven to be highly effective in the sorption–spectrophotometric determination of chromium ions. Anchoring the reagent enhances its chemical stability (preventing leaching and degradation), increases the local concentration on the sorbent surface – thus lowering the detection limit – and enables the multiple use of the sorbent, reducing operational costs.
In this study, the analytical capabilities of immobilized EBT on silk fibroin were thoroughly investigated for the selective determination of Cr(III). The main findings are summarized as follows:
(I)
A rapid and sensitive sorption–spectrophotometric method was developed, with a detection limit of 1.2 µg L⁻¹, analysis time of approximately 10 minutes, and linearity in the range of 5–50 µg (R² = 0.9991).
(II)
A novel carrier – silk fibroin fiber – was proposed, with an EBT immobilization efficiency of up to 88%.
(III)
Spectral parameters were established: In solution: λ_max = 508 nm (EBT) and 618 nm (Cr–EBT complex); In solid phase: λ_max = 520 nm (immobilized reagent) and 620 nm (complex).
(IV)
The formation of the Cr–O bond and the nature of complexation were confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy (band at 607 cm⁻¹), X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF), and SEM-EDS.
(V)
The method demonstrated high selectivity: Ni²⁺, Fe³⁺, and Cu²⁺ ions did not interfere with Cr³⁺ detection even at high excess; potential interferences (e.g., Al³⁺, Mn²⁺, Co²⁺) were effectively eliminated using masking agents.
(VI)
The method was successfully validated on wastewater samples from three industrial facilities – Navoi Electrochemical Plant, Mubarek Gas Processing Plant, and Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex – with found Cr(III) concentrations closely matching the added values (deviations ≤ 6%).
Thus, the developed sorption–spectrophotometric approach using fibroin–EBT represents a reliable and cost-effective tool for monitoring Cr(III) ions in both industrial and environmental water samples. Future research should focus on expanding the range of detectable metal ions by modifying the carrier’s functional groups and on miniaturizing the sensor for rapid in situ analysis.
A
A
A
Conflict of interest:
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
References
1.
Chowdhury MA, Hossain I, Hossain N, Zahid S, Sakib-Uz-Zaman C, Shuvho BA, Moktaruzzaman N (2023) Analysis of thin film electrochemical deposition process diffused by carbon tool steels. Results Chem 5:100878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2023.100878
2.
Shange SF, Mdluli PS, Deenadayalu N (2025) A review of the application of CIELAB colour systems for the development of gold and silver nano-enabled colorimetric assays for the detection of chromium. Results Chem 102048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102048
3.
Shaikh R, Memon N, Solangi AR, Shaikh HI, Agheem MH, Shah ASA, Kandhro MR (2016) 2,3-Pyridine dicarboxylic acid functionalized gold nanoparticles: Insight into experimental conditions for Cr3 + sensing. Spectrochimica Acta Part Mol Biomol Spectrosc 173:241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2016.09.016
4.
Lo S, Wu M, Venkatesan P, Wu S (2015) Colorimetric detection of chromium(III) using O-phospho-l-serine dithiocarbamic acid functionalized gold nanoparticles. Sens Actuators B Chem 220:772–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.05.120
5.
Guo J, Huo D, Yang M, Hou C, Li J, Fa H, Luo H, Yang P (2016) Colorimetric detection of Cr (VI) based on the leaching of gold nanoparticles using a paper-based sensor. Talanta 161:819–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.09.032
6.
Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ (2012) Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. EXS 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6
7.
Yu G, Chen F, Zhang H, Wang Z (2020) Pollution and health risk assessment of heavy metals in soils of Guizhou, China. Ecosyst Health Sustain 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2020.1859948
8.
Rahman MS, Kumar P, Ullah M, Jolly YN, Akhter S, Kabir J, Begum BA, Salam A (2021) Elemental analysis in surface soil and dust of roadside academic institutions in Dhaka city, Bangladesh and their impact on human health. Environ Chem Ecotoxicol 3:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2021.06.001
9.
Akoto O, Gyimah E, Zhan Z, Xu H, Nimako C (2019) Evaluation of health risks associated with trace metal exposure in water from the Barekese reservoir in Kumasi, Ghana. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 26(4):1134–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1559033
10.
Smanova ZA, Usmanova XU, Madusmanova NK, Bobojanov BB, Maxmudova GO (2021) Immobilized Oxyazo Compounds as Analytical Reagents for the Sorption-Luminescent Determination of Certain Metals. Turk. Online J. Qual. Inq, ; 12, 6113–6119. Available at: https://www.tojqi.net/index.php/journal/article/view/7042
11.
Bobojonov K, Usmanova K, Smanova Z, Gafurova D, Abdullayeva M (2025) Analytical application of sorption–fluorescence methods for the determination of aluminium, beryllium, and lead in environmental samples. Int J Environ Anal Chem 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2025.2511983
12.
Yakhshieva ZZ, Usmanova KU, Zhuraev KB, Akhmadjonova YT, Umarov. FA (2023) G.B.Karabaeva. Development of methods for the Determination of Aluminium in Water. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 10 (2S), 3322–3337 Available at: https://sifisheriessciences.com/index.php/journal/issue/view/21
13.
Li M, Tang Y, Zhao R, Gao T, Zhang L (2022) Rapid ultrasensitive detection of hexavalent chromium in soil and groundwater by a microProbing imaging platform. J Hazard Mater 433:128809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128809
14.
He Q, Chang X, Zheng H, Jiang N, Wang X (2008) Determination of chromium(III) and total chromium in natural waters using a surface ion-imprinted silica gel as selective adsorbent. Int J Environ Anal Chem 88(6):373–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067310701710870
15.
Sel S, Erulaş FA, Turak F, Bakırdere S (2018) Simultaneous Determination of Chromium Species in Water and Plant Samples at Trace Levels by Ion Chromatography–Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. Anal Lett 52(5):761–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2018.1494738
16.
Kazemi E, Haji Shabani AM, Dadfarnia S, Izadi F (2017) Speciation and determination of chromium ions by dispersive micro solid phase extraction using magnetic graphene oxide followed by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Int J Environ Anal Chem 97(11):1080–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2017.1381693
17.
Sungur Ş, Kılboz Y, Atan MM (2013) Determination of Chromium Species in Various Medicinal Plants Consumed in Hatay Region in Turkey. Int J Food Prop 16(8):1711–1716. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2011.604894
18.
Madatov U, Rakhimov S, Normatov B, Tuychiev S, Khalilova L, Smanova Z (2022) Immobilized reagent disodium salt of 1, 8-dioxynaphthalene-3,6-disulfonic acids for the determination of chromium ions. AIP Conference Proceedings. ; 2471, 050022. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0091191
19.
Wei X, Zhou J, Liu J, Chen M, Wang J (2021) Determination of chromium based on laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Chin J Anal Chem (Chinese Version) 49(3):432–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2040(21)60086-5
20.
Wang T, Qian T, Huo L, Li Y, Zhao D (2019) Immobilization of hexavalent chromium in soil and groundwater using synthetic pyrite particles. Environ Pollut 255:112992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.112992
21.
Wang T, Liu Y, Wang J, Wang X, Liu B, Wang Y (2018) In-situ remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated groundwater and saturated soil using stabilized iron sulfide nanoparticles. J Environ Manage 231:679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.085
22.
Choudhary B, Paul D, Singh A, Gupta T (2017) Removal of hexavalent chromium upon interaction with biochar under acidic conditions: mechanistic insights and application. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(20):16786–16797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9322-9
23.
Sangkarak S, Phetrak A, Kittipongvises S, Kitkaew D, Phihusut D, Lohwacharin J (2020) Adsorptive performance of activated carbon reused from household drinking water filter for hexavalent chromium-contaminated water. J Environ Manage 272:111085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111085
24.
Sebabi MO, Mabuba N, Pillay K, Malinga SP (2024) Hyperbranched-Polyethylenimine-Functionalized coal fly ash as an adsorbent for the removal of hexavalent chromium and reuse as a dye photocatalyst. ACS Omega 9(8):8954–8972. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c06491
25.
Shakya A, Núñez-Delgado A, Agarwal T (2019) Biochar synthesis from sweet lime peel for hexavalent chromium remediation from aqueous solution. J Environ Manage 251:109570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109570
26.
Procópio VA, Pereira RM, Lange CN, Freire BM, Batista BL (2023) Chromium speciation by HPLC-DAD/ICP-MS: Simultaneous hyphenation of analytical techniques for studies of biomolecules. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(6):4912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064912
27.
Erarpat S, Demir C, Öner M, Bakırdere S (2022) Chromium speciation by the combination of high-performance liquid chromatography and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. Environ Monit Assess 194(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10395-z
28.
Pechancová R, Pluháček T, Gallo J, Milde D (2018) Study of chromium species release from metal implants in blood and joint effusion: Utilization of HPLC-ICP-MS. Talanta 185:370–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.03.100
29.
Spinazzè A, Spanu D, Della Bella P, Corti C, Borghi F, Fanti G, Cattaneo A, Wise WR, Davis SJ, Cavallo DM, Recchia S (2022) On the Determination of Cr(VI) in Cr(III)-Rich Particulates: From the Failure of Official Methods to the Development of an Alternative Protocol. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(19):12111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912111
30.
Song J, Dubey B, Jang Y, Townsend T, Sologabriele H (2005) Implication of chromium speciation on disposal of discarded CCA-treated wood. J Hazard Mater 128(2–3):280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.08.004
31.
Yan Z, Jiang L, Xu C, Liu J (2018) Determination of chromium (III) ions in water samples by UV–vis spectrometry based on benzyl-functionalized benzimidazolylidene ligand. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 18(6):2081–2091. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2018.032
32.
Cao M, Ye X, Liu Y, Zhang P, Zhang Z (2023) Spectrophotometric and colorimetric trivalent chromium ions detection in aqueous solution based on citrate-capped gold nanoparticles. Chem Pap 77(8):4719–4725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-023-02788-2
33.
Taresh RR, Roushani M, Karazan ZM (2024) Selective electrochemical detection of chromium ions in water samples by poly (rutin)/carbon black-chitosan nanocomposite-modified glassy carbon electrode. J Appl Electrochem 54(7):1627–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-023-02054-z
34.
Wang Z, Yang Y, Zou T, Xing X, Zhao R, Wang Y (2019) Novel method for the qualitative identification of chromium ions (III) using l-aspartic acid stabilized CdS quantum dots. J Phys Chem Solids 136:109160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109160
35.
Firdaus Lutfi M, Apriyoanda H, Isnan I, Wyantuti S, Eddy Rokhmawaty D (2023) Quantitative Analysis of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) Using Gold Nanoparticles with UV-Vis Spectrometry and Smartphone Colorimetric-Sensing. Iran J Chem Chem Eng 1021–9986. https://doi.org/10.30492/ijcce.2022.545954.5087. /2023/3/722–730
36.
Bobojonov B et al (2023) Efficient and cost-effective determination of Cr(VI) ions using immobilized 4,5-dihydroxynaphthalene-2,7-disulfonic acid disodium salt dihydrate: a novel analytical reagent with high selectivity and sensitivity. Int J Environ Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2023.2235562
37.
Den Boef G, De Jong WJ, Krijn GC, Poppe H (1960) Spectrophotometric determination of chromium(III) with EDTA. Anal Chim Acta 23:557–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2670(60)80127-436
38.
De Costa CLS, Ferreira ACS, Teixeira SLC (2004) G. Spectrophotometric determination of chromium in steel with 4-(2- thiazolylazo)-resorcinol (TAR) using microwave radiation. J Braz Chem Soc 15(1):153–157. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-50532004000100025
39.
Soares R, Carneiroa MC, Monteiro MIC, De Souza Henrique S, Junior Pontes FVM, Da Silva LID, Neto AA, Santelli RE (2009) Simultaneous speciation of chromium by spectrophotometry and multicomponent analysis. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 21(3):153–160. https://doi.org/10.3184/095422909x466095
40.
Da Silva Borges S, Korn M, Costa Lima D (2002) L. F. Chromium(III) Determination with 1,5-Diphenylcarbazide Based on the Oxidative Effect of Chlorine Radicals Generated from CCl4 Sonolysis in Aqueous Solution. Anal Sci 18(12):1361–1366. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.18.1361
41.
Hagendorfer H, Goessler W (2008) Separation of chromium(III) and chromium(VI) by ion chromatography and an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer as element-selective detector. Talanta 76(3):656–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.04.010
42.
Meeravali NN, Madhavi K, Kumar SJ (2010) A sensitive sequential non-chromatographic speciation analysis of chromium in natural/wastewaters by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom 26(1):214–219. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ja00085j
43.
Pedrotti MF, Santos D, Cauduro VH, Bizzi CA, Flores EM (2022b) Ultrasound-assisted extraction of chromium from tanned leather shavings: A promising continuous flow technology for the treatment of solid waste. Ultrason Sonochem 89:106124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106124
44.
Chen Z, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2006) Speciation of chromium in waste water using ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Talanta 72(2):394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2006.10.041
Total words in MS: 6246
Total words in Title: 15
Total words in Abstract: 167
Total Keyword count: 5
Total Images in MS: 14
Total Tables in MS: 13
Total Reference count: 44