References
1.Pederzoli F, Joice G, Salonia A, Bivalacqua TJ, Sopko NA. Regenerative and engineered options for urethroplasty. Nat Rev Urol. 2019;16:453–64.
2.Castagnetti M, El-Ghoneimi A. Surgical management of primary severe hypospadias in children: an update focusing on penile curvature. Nat Rev Urol. 2022;19:147–60.
3.Orlandini SZ, Orlandini GE. Ultrastructure of human male urethra. Arch Androl. 1989;23:51–9.
4.Miller DC, Saigal CS, Litwin MS. The demographic burden of urologic diseases in America. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36:11–27.
5.Wessells H, McAninch JW. Current controversies in anterior urethral stricture repair: free-graft versus pedicled skin-flap reconstruction. World J Urol. 1998;16:175–80.
6.Hussein MM, Moursy E, Gamal W, Zaki M, Rashed A, Abozaid A. The use of penile skin graft versus penile skin flap in the repair of long bulbo-penile urethral stricture: a prospective randomized study. Urology. 2011;77:1232–7.
7.Barbagli G, Pellegrini G, Corradini F, Montorsi F, Sansalone S, Butnaru D, et al. One-stage penile urethroplasty using oral mucosal graft and glue. Eur Urol. 2016;70:1069–75.
8.Fichtner J, Filipas D, Fisch M, Hohenfellner R, Thüroff JW. Long-term follow up of buccal mucosa onlay graft for hypospadias repair: analysis of complications. J Urol. 2004;172:1970–2.
9.Milenkovic U, Albersen M, Castiglione F. The mechanisms and potential of stem cell therapy for penile fibrosis. Nat Rev Urol. 2019;16:79–97.
10.Gonzalez-Cadavid NF. Mechanisms of penile fibrosis. J Sex Med. 2009;6(Suppl 3):353–62.
11.Feil G, Christ-Adler M, Maurer S, Corvin S, Rennekampff H-O, Krug J, et al. Investigations of urothelial cells seeded on commercially available small intestine submucosa. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1330–7.
12.Cunnane EM, Davis NF, Cunnane CV, Lorentz KL, Ryan AJ, Hess J, et al. Mechanical, compositional and morphological characterisation of the human male urethra for the development of a biomimetic tissue engineered urethral scaffold. Biomaterials. 2021;269:120651.
13.Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano DR, Yoo JJ, Lopez-Bayghen E, Soker S, Atala A. Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study. Lancet. 2011;377:1175–82.
14.Davis NF, Cunnane EM, O’Brien FJ, Mulvihill JJ, Walsh MT. Tissue engineered extracellular matrices (ECMs) in urology: evolution and future directions. Surgeon. 2018;16:55–65.
15.Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, Chen XX, Chandra P, Mo XM, et al. 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: an in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:154–64.
16.Booth D, Afshari R, Ghovvati M, Shariati K, Sturm R, Annabi N. Advances in 3D bioprinting for urethral tissue reconstruction. Trends Biotechnol. 2024;42:544–59.
17.Tan QY, Le HX, Tang C, Zhang M, Yang WJ, Hong YZ, et al. Tailor-made natural and synthetic grafts for precise urethral reconstruction. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20:392.
18.Li C, Xu YM, Song LJ, Fu Q, Cui L, Yin S. Urethral reconstruction using oral keratinocyte seeded bladder acellular matrix grafts. J Urol. 2008;180:1538–42.
19.Colaco M, Igel DA, Atala A. The potential of 3D printing in urological research and patient care. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15:213–21.
20.Ni Y, Qi H, Zhang F, Jiang S, Tang Q, Cai W, et al. Macrophages modulate stiffness-related foreign body responses through plasma membrane deformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120:e2213837120.
21.Chambers RM, Baitera B. The anatomy of the urethral stricture. Br J Urol. 1977;49:545–51.
22.Lumen N, Hoebeke P, Willemsen P, De Troyer B, Pieters R, Oosterlinck W. Etiology of urethral stricture disease in the 21st century. J Urol. 2009;182:983–7.
23.Wynn TA, Ramalingam TR. Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat Med. 2012;18:1028–40.
24.Rockey DC, Bell PD, Hill JA. Fibrosis–a common pathway to organ injury and failure. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1138–49.
25.Chen SQ, Shao A, Xia C, Zeng LT, Sun ZJ, Zhu JY et al. Local sustained H2 release assisted stem cell transplantation for enhanced osteoarthritic cartilage regeneration. Cell Biomater. 2025;100220.
26.Zeng LT, Zhao B, Chen DY, Xia C, He QJ. GeSe nanosheets-mediated local sonocatalytic immunosuppression of rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35:2420195.
27.Wang LY, Wang K, Yang M, Yang X, Li DY, Liu M, et al. Urethral microenvironment adapted sodium alginate/gelatin/reduced graphene oxide biomimetic patch improves scarless urethral regeneration. Adv Sci. 2024;11:2302574.
28.Jin YW, Wang Y, Yang RX, Fang WZ, Zhang K, Liu M, et al. Multilayered hydrogel scaffold construct with native tissue matched elastic modulus: a regenerative microenvironment for urethral scar-free healing. Biomaterials. 2025;312:122711.
29.Jia WS, Tang H, Wu JJ, Hou XL, Chen B, Chen W, et al. Urethral tissue regeneration using collagen scaffold modified with collagen binding VEGF in a beagle model. Biomaterials. 2015;69:45–55.
30.Wan X, Yao HJ, Wei ZW, Gao DJ, Zheng DC, Xu B, et al. Heterogeneous porous hypoxia-mimicking scaffolds propel urethral reconstruction by promoting angiogenesis and regulating inflammation. Biomaterials. 2025;314:122833.
31.Cao NL, Song LJ, Liu WJ, Fan SN, Jiang D, Mu JG, et al. Prevascularized bladder acellular matrix hydrogel/silk fibroin composite scaffolds promote the regeneration of urethra in a rabbit model. Biomed Mater. 2018;14:015002.
32.Wan X, Xie MK, Xu H, Wei ZW, Yao HJ, Wang Z, et al. Hypoxia-preconditioned adipose-derived stem cells combined with scaffold promote urethral reconstruction by upregulation of angiogenesis and glycolysis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11:535.
33.Kobayashi J, Kikuchi A, Aoyagi T, Okano T. Cell sheet tissue engineering: Cell sheet preparation, harvesting/manipulation, and transplantation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2019;107:955–67.
34.Orabi H, AbouShwareb T, Zhang Y, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Cell-seeded tubularized scaffolds for reconstruction of long urethral defects: a preclinical study. Eur Urol. 2013;63:531–8.
35.Li YW, Wu JT, Feng F, Men CP, Yang DD, Gao ZL, et al. A preclinical study of cell-seeded tubularized scaffolds specially secreting LL37 for reconstruction of long urethral defects. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:4295–301.
36.Zhong H, Shen YM, Zhao DH, Yan GQ, Wu CA, Huang GL, et al. Cell-seeded acellular artery for reconstruction of long urethral defects in a canine model. Stem Cells Int. 2021;2021:8854479.
37.Hu SQ, Sun XH, Zhou R, Fu K, Mo YF, Xu JL, et al. Bioengineered cardiovascular bypass grafts via in vivo self-assembly of scaffold-guided tubular tissue in rats. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23:574.
38.Liu GC, Fu M, Li F, Fu W, Zhao Z, Xia HM, et al. Tissue-engineered PLLA/gelatine nanofibrous scaffold promoting the phenotypic expression of epithelial and smooth muscle cells for urethral reconstruction. Mater Sci Eng C Mater. 2020;111:110810.
39.Zhang YL, Liu A, Tian YY, Tian YJ, Qi XS, Qiu H, et al. Direct-ink-writing printed aerogels with dynamically reversible thermal management and tunable electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv Mater. 2025;37:2505521.
40.Tyler B, Gullotti D, Mangraviti A, Utsuki T, Brem H. Polylactic acid (PLA) controlled delivery carriers for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;107:163–75.
41.Abbas TO, Parangusan H, Yalcin HC, Hassan M, Zakrif L, Zandi N, et al. Trilayer composite scaffold for urethral reconstruction: in vitro evaluation of mechanical, biological, and angiogenic properties. Biomed Mater. 2024;19:025022.
42.Saeedinejad F, Alipanah F, Toro S, Pereira N, Ghanbariamin D, Jozic I, et al. In situ-formed tissue-adhesive macroporous scaffolds enhance cell infiltration and tissue regeneration. Acta Biomateria. 2025;200:358–77.
43.Nuininga JE, van Moerkerk H, Hanssen A, Hulsbergen CA, Oosterwijk-Wakka J, Oosterwijk E, et al. Rabbit urethra replacement with a defined biomatrix or small intestinal submucosa. Eur Urol. 2003;44:266–71.
44.Fan YY, Yao JX, Liu W, Wang LB, Yang J, Zheng XY, et al. 3D printed composite scaffold accelerates bone regeneration by modulating immunity and promoting angiogenesis. J Mater Sci Technol. 2026;240:1–18.
45.Mao K, Tong S, He Z, Li B, Wang C, Luo X, et al. 3D-printed nano-Si3N4 composite scaffolds loaded with BMSCs microgels promote bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Technol. 2026;244:285–300.
46.Bernal PN, Florczak S, Inacker S, Kuang X, Madrid-Wolff J, Regehly M et al. The road ahead in materials and technologies for volumetric 3D printing. Nat Rev Mater. 2025;1–16.
47.Liu A, Qiu H, Lu XH, Guo H, Hu JW, Liang CB, et al. Asymmetric structural MXene/PBO aerogels for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding with ultra-low reflection. Adv Mater. 2025;37:2414085.
48.Ostadi Y, Khanali J, Tehrani FA, Yazdanpanah G, Bahrami S, Niazi F, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds for soft tissue augmentation: from host–scaffold interactions to bottlenecks in clinical translation. Biomater Res. 2024;28:0071.
49.Kasravi M, Ahmadi A, Babajani A, Mazloomnejad R, Hatamnejad MR, Shariatzadeh S, et al. Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomater Res. 2023;27:10.