|
Characteristic
|
Value
|
|---|---|
|
Total number of patients
|
149
|
|
Female, n(%)
|
136 (91.3%)
|
|
Male, n(%)
|
13(8.7% )
|
|
Mean Age (years)
|
33.85 ± 11.69
|
|
Laboratory Markers
|
|
|
ESR (mm/h)
|
16.53 ± 19.99
|
|
CRP (mg/L)
|
10.57 ± 25.56
|
|
TNF-α (pg/mL)
|
14.79 ± 38.03
|
|
eGFR(mL/min/1.73m2 )
|
109.69 ± 22.46
|
|
Presence of Plaques in Abdominal Aorta, n(%)
|
|
|
No Plaques (%)
|
69 (46.3%)
|
|
Plaques (%)
|
80 (53.7%)
|
|
Severe Stenosis in Abdominal Aorta, n(%)
|
29(19.5%)
|
|
Severe Stenosis in Renal Artery, n(%)
|
42(28.2%)
|
| ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate. | |
| 3.2 Univariate Analysis of Factors Associated with Renal Function | |
| As summarized in Table 2, univariate analysis revealed that patient age, CRP level, and the presence of abdominal aortic plaques were significantly correlated with eGFR. Age exhibited the strongest inverse correlation with eGFR (r = -0.538, p < 0.001). In contrast, CRP demonstrated a positive correlation with eGFR (r = 0.204, p = 0.007). The underlying reason for this counterintuitive finding warrants further investigation, though it may be influenced by confounding factors or the complex interplay between inflammation and renal hemodynamics in TA. Additionally, patients with aortic plaques had significantly lower eGFR compared to those without (r = -0.305, p < 0.001). No significant linear association was observed between severe RAS and eGFR in this univariate analysis (p = 0.183). | |
|
Variable
|
Correlation Coefficient (r)
|
P-value
|
|---|---|---|
|
Continuous Variables
|
||
|
Age
|
-0.538
|
< 0.001
|
|
CRP
|
0.204
|
0.007
|
|
Categorical Variables
|
||
|
Abdominal aortic plaque
|
-0.305
|
< 0.001
|
|
Severe RAS
|
-0.075
|
0.183
|
| Pearson's correlation coefficient was used for continuous variables (Age, CRP). Point-biserial correlation coefficient was used for categorical variables (Plaque, Stenosis). | ||
| 3.3 Multivariate Linear Regression Identifying Independent Determinants of Renal Function | ||
| To ascertain the independent contributions of these factors, we performed a series of multivariate linear regression analyses (Table 3). In Model 1, which included age alone, age was strongly and inversely associated with eGFR (standardized β = -0.538, p < 0.001), explaining 29.0% of the variance in eGFR. After introducing CRP into Model 2, its association with eGFR was attenuated and became non-significant (β = 0.113, p = 0.116). When abdominal aortic plaque was added in Model 3, its association with eGFR also lost statistical significance (β = -0.075, p = 0.338), while the effect of age remained stable and significant. This finding confirms our central hypothesis that the apparent link between plaque and eGFR is primarily driven by patient age. In the final model (Model 4), severe RAS was identified as an independent negative predictor of eGFR (β = -0.143, p = 0.043). Despite this, patient age remained the most robust independent factor influencing renal function (β = -0.500, p < 0.001). All regression models were statistically significant (p < 0.001). | ||
|
Variable
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 3
|
Model 4 (Final)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Std. β (p-value)
|
Std. β (p-value)
|
Std. β (p-value)
|
Std. β (p-value)
|
|
|
Age
|
-0.538 (< 0.001)
|
-0.518 (< 0.001)
|
-0.488 (< 0.001)
|
-0.500 (< 0.001)
|
|
CRP
|
—
|
0.113 (0.116)
|
0.102 (0.158)
|
0.121 (0.094)
|
|
Abdominal aortic plaque
|
—
|
—
|
-0.075 (0.338)
|
-0.072 (0.352)
|
|
Severe RAS
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
-0.143 (0.043)
|
|
Model R²
|
0.29
|
0.302
|
0.307
|
0.327
|
|
Model p-value
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
| Std. β, standardized beta coefficient; R², coefficient of determination. | ||||
| All variance inflation factors (VIF) were substantially below 10, indicating no multicollinearity concerns. The dash (—) indicates that the variable was not included in the respective model. | ||||
| 3.4 Multivariate Logistic Regression Identifies Age as a Risk Factor for Clinical Renal Impairment | ||||
| To further delineate risk factors for clinically significant renal impairment, we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis with the outcome defined as eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73m². | ||||
| The final parsimonious model, which included age and severe RAS, is presented in Table 4. Consistent with the linear regression findings, increasing age was a strong and independent risk factor for clinical renal impairment (adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.078 per year, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.036–1.122, p < 0.001). This indicates that for each additional year of age, the odds of having impaired renal function increased by 7.8%. Severe RAS showed a non-significant trend toward a negative association with renal impairment (adjusted OR = 0.371, 95% CI: 0.126–1.093, p = 0.072). The inclusion of abdominal aortic plaque or CRP in the model did not significantly alter the effects of age or RAS, and neither variable was independently associated with the outcome (both p > 0.1). Consequently, they were excluded from the final model to enhance its robustness and clarity. | ||||
|
Variable
|
B
|
S.E.
|
Wald
|
p-value
|
Adjusted OR
|
95% CI for OR
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age (per 1-year increase)
|
0.075
|
0.02
|
13.527
|
< 0.001
|
1.078
|
1.036–1.122
|
|
Severe RAS
|
-0.992
|
0.552
|
3.232
|
0.072
|
0.371
|
0.126–1.093
|
|
Constant
|
-4.087
|
0.869
|
22.13
|
< 0.001
|
0.017
|
|
| OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval. The model achieved a non-significant result on the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (p > 0.05), indicating a good fit. | ||||||
| 3. Discussion | ||||||
| This study directly answers its central research question by demonstrating that in patients with TA and abdominal aortic involvement, patient age is the strongest independent predictor of renal function, surpassing even RAS. While age-related renal decline is well-recognized in general medicine, its significance in TA has been systematically overlooked. Our results challenge the current "disease-centered" clinical approach, which often attributes changes in kidney function solely to active vasculitis or complications such as RAS, thereby underestimating the fundamental role of physiological aging in this population. | ||||||
| The underappreciation of age in the clinical assessment of TA is understandable. TA typically affects younger adults (mean age ~ 34 years in our cohort), which lowers clinical suspicion for age-related functional decline[16–18]. Moreover, more overt disease features such as RAS naturally draw greater clinical attention[7–9,19]. However, our analysis suggests that persistent inflammation and vascular stress in TA may not only cause specific vascular injury but also accelerate kidney aging, potentially through hastening atherosclerotic processes[20–24]. Practically, this implies that the kidneys of a TA patient may be functionally older than their chronological age. This notion is supported by our regression models, in which chronological age emerged as the dominant predictor of renal function (β = −0.500), surpassing even severe RAS. This strong association likely extends beyond natural aging, pointing to a disease-specific process of “accelerated renal aging.” TA is characterized by persistent, low‑grade inflammation, which may foster a pro‑aging microenvironment conducive to oxidative stress, cellular senescence, and epigenetic alterations[25–28]. These mechanisms could effectively decouple biological renal age from chronological time, providing a plausible explanation for why a simple chronological variable outperforms traditional disease markers: age may encapsulate the cumulative toll of both time and the specific disease burden on renal tissue. | ||||||
| Our findings encourage a reevaluation of how other risk factors are interpreted in TA. Although RAS was confirmed as an independent predictor of worse renal function (β = -0.143), its effect size was notably smaller than that of age. This implies that RAS may act as an acute functional insult superimposed upon a gradual, age-related decline. Therefore, before attributing kidney impairment to RAS, clinicians should first assess whether a patient's eGFR is lower than expected for their age[29]. The analysis of aortic plaque illustrates how age can confound clinical interpretation: the association between plaque and reduced eGFR disappeared after adjusting for age, indicating that some imaging findings may reflect aging rather than active disease. Similarly, the initially observed link between higher CRP and better eGFR weakened after accounting for age, highlighting the complex interplay between inflammation, aging, and renal function in TA[30]. | ||||||
| Strengths of this study include a well-defined patient cohort, standardized vascular imaging, and statistical methods that isolated the effect of age from other variables. Important limitations must be considered. The retrospective, cross-sectional design precludes causal conclusions and requires prospective validation. The use of creatinine-based eGFR is also less reliable under inflammatory conditions. Furthermore, not all potential confounders—such as long-term blood pressure control—could be fully adjusted for. | ||||||
| The robust association between age and renal function compels a practical shift in clinical assessment. Our data provide direct evidence for establishing an integrated framework: the strong independent association we observed (standardized β = -0.500) quantitatively supports the need to adjust clinical expectations for eGFR based on patient age. We propose that the evaluation of renal health in TA should therefore adopt a two-step approach: first, interpreting a patient’s eGFR with this age-aware perspective to establish a more rational physiological baseline; second, evaluating the superimposed contribution of disease-specific factors, such as RAS, within this context. This integrated framework mitigates the risk of misattributing physiological or accelerated age-related decline solely to active vasculitis, thereby guiding more accurate risk stratification and personalized management decisions. | ||||||
| 4. Conclusions | ||||||
| Our study demonstrates that in patients with Takayasu arteritis and abdominal aortic involvement, chronological age is the strongest independent predictor of renal functions. This finding holds critical, yet easily overlooked, clinical significance because TA predominantly affects young adults, a demographic in which physiological aging is rarely considered a primary contributor to organ function decline. By establishing age as the dominant factor even within this young cohort, our results necessitate a shift in the clinical assessment of renal health in TA: from attributing changes predominantly to measurable vascular complications toward an integrated model that places chronological age at the core of personalized risk stratification and management. | ||||||