A
A
A
Urinary Bowel Stone: Calculus Formation in a Repurposed Small Intestine - a Case Report
David Navarro: 0000-0002-1977-794X
ORCID
Cristina Jorge: 0000-0001-7850-4805
Authors
Diana Santos1,2, David Navarro1,2,3,4, Cristina Jorge1,2,3, Nuno Moreira Fonseca1,2,3,4
1- Nephrology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Lisbon, Portugal
2- Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
3- NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
4- iNOVA4HEALTH, NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
Diana Santos: 0009-0003-4006-4586
Nuno Moreira Fonseca: 0000-0003-0821-2764
Corresponding author:
Correspondence to Diana Santos – dianasantos1998@gmail.com
Background:
A
Urinary diversion with an ileal conduit is associated with an increased risk of urinary tract calculi, driven by metabolic disturbances, recurrent infections, urinary stasis, and foreign bodies. Although stone formation is a known complication, calculi developing around migrated surgical material remain an uncommon and underreported occurrence.
Case Presentation:
An 81-year-old male patient with a history of radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation for invasive urothelial carcinoma presented with flank pain and urinary tract infection four years after surgery. Morphological analysis of two spontaneously expelled urinary stones retrieved from the conduit drainage bag classified both calculi as type IVc, with a central nucleus composed of surgical staples. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy revealed a mixed composition of struvite (80%) and sodium hydrogenurate (20%), consistent with infection-related lithiasis. The findings supported stone formation around migrated foreign material in the context of chronic bacteriuria.
Conclusion:
Surgical staple migration can act as a nidus for infection-related stone formation in patients with ileal conduits, even several years after cystectomy. Stone analysis plays a crucial role in identifying foreign-body–associated calculi and possible underlying mechanisms. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for urolithiasis in patients with urinary diversions presenting with flank pain or recurrent infections.
Keywords
Ileal conduit
Urolithiasis
Surgical staple migration
Struvite stones
Case report
A
A
A
Introduction:
Urinary diversion via an ileal conduit is a frequently performed procedure following cystectomy. However, patients with ileal conduits are at an increased risk for developing urinary tract calculi. Nephrolithiasis develops in up to 12% of patients with ileal conduits and the overall incidence of stones after any urinary diversion approaches 32% when upper-tract calculi are included (1, 2). Potential contributing factors include metabolic disturbances, recurrent urinary tract infections, urinary stasis due to anatomical alterations, and the presence of foreign bodies within the conduit. We present a case of urinary stone formation within an ileal conduit, with the calculus developing around a migrated surgical staple.
Case description:
An 81-year-old male with a history of invasive urothelial carcinoma underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit formation in 2020. He has been followed by nephrology since 2022 for chronic kidney disease, without known history of nephrolithiasis. The patient presented with a several-month history of flank pain, leading to the diagnosis of a urinary tract infection and initiation of empiric antibiotic therapy. During a subsequent nephrology evaluation, he brought two expelled urinary stones collected from the drainage bag.
Morphological examination of the calculi at our department, performed in accordance with established guidelines (3), revealed that both stones were classified as Type IVc, formed around a nucleus of surgical staples (Fig. 1). Further analysis using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) confirmed the presence of struvite 80%, along with 20% sodium hydrogenurate.
Fig. 1
- Urinary stone with a surgical staple serving as the central nucleus. The staple is surrounded by a smooth, white, lustrous stone matrix composed predominantly of struvite. Adjacent to the staple, a brownish powdery material corresponds to sodium hydrogenurate deposits (arrow).
Click here to Correct
Discussion:
Surgical staples are designed for permanent fixation, but in some cases, they may become dislodged or migrate due to tissue remodeling, local inflammation, or mechanical forces (4). In the setting of urinary diversions such as ileal conduits, this phenomenon can lead to unexpected and clinically significant complications. Migration of metallic clips or staples into the urinary tract—though rare—has been documented and may serve as a nidus for renal stone formation. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion in post-cystectomy patients presenting with acute flank pain (5).
Surgical staples that become dislodged within ileal conduits can act as a core around which urinary stones form, accounting for approximately 86% of conduit calculi associated with foreign material (6). In some instances, these staples become completely encapsulated by stone material, making them undetectable on gross visual inspection. Recurrent urinary tract infections—particularly those involving urea-splitting bacteria—can further predispose patients to the formation of such calculi.
A
While stones under 3 cm pass spontaneously in approximately half of cases, larger or symptomatic calculi often require intervention. In patients with complex urinary diversions, antegrade ureterorenoscopy with laser lithotripsy is effective, especially when retrograde access is limited, and preserves the ureteroneovesical anastomosis (2, 7).
Management of this complication must extend beyond stone extraction. Comprehensive preventive strategies include aggressive hydration, correction of metabolic acidosis, routine conduit irrigation to minimize mucus accumulation, and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis for recurrent bacteriuria (1). Early identification and risk factor modification are key to reducing recurrence.
In our case, the first presentation of conduit stone occurred 48 months after diversion, falling within the reported range of 3 to 72 months. The stone was predominantly composed of struvite, indicating that its formation was driven by a urinary tract infection with urea-splitting bacteria. Notably, staple-associated stones have been shown to form earlier, with a mean latency of 22.5 months (6), emphasizing the need for early vigilance in this patient population.
Conclusion:
Urinary stone formation in ileal conduits remains a clinically significant complication, often driven by a combination of metabolic derangements, chronic infection, and structural factors. This case underscores the potential for surgical staples to act as a nidus for struvite-based calculi, even several years after cystectomy. Clinicians managing patients with urinary diversions should maintain vigilance for signs of urolithiasis and consider the possibility of retained foreign bodies, particularly in the context of recurrent infections or spontaneous stone passage. Preventive strategies—including meticulous surgical technique, regular follow-up, infection control, and metabolic management—are essential to reducing the long-term burden of stone disease in this high-risk population.
A
Funding
No funding
Author information
Authors and affiliations
Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
Diana Santos, David Navarro, Cristina Jorge & Nuno Moreira Fonseca
NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
David Navarro, Cristina Jorge & Nuno Moreira Fonseca
Nephrology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Lisbon, Portugal
Diana Santos, David Navarro, Cristina Jorge & Nuno Moreira Fonseca
iNOVA4HEALTH, NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
David Navarro & Nuno Moreira Fonseca
Contributions
DS – literature search, data analysis, and manuscript drafting, editing, and review.
DN – concept, study design, clinical data acquisition, manuscript review.
CJ – manuscript review.
NMF – definition of intellectual content, manuscript editing, manuscript review.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for publication of this case report and accompanying images was obtained from the patient. The authors confirm responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data and for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Clinical trial registration
Not applicable.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material
A
Author Contribution
DS – literature search, data analysis, and manuscript drafting, editing, and review.DN – concept, study design, clinical data acquisition, manuscript review.CJ – manuscript review.NMF – definition of intellectual content, manuscript editing, manuscript review.All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
A
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Additional data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References:
1.
Seth JH, Promponas J, Hadjipavlou M, Anjum F, Sriprasad S. Urolithiasis following urinary diversion. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(5):383–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0880-y.
2.
Espinheira Santos V, Borges C, de Oliveira Carneiro EV, Rodrigues de Araújo J, J. L., Araújo Andrade J. Giant Stone in Ileal Conduit. Urol Int. 2020;104(1–2):163–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499091.
3.
Daudon M, Haymann JP, Estrade V, Meria P, Almeras C, Lithiasis Committee of the French Association of Urology (CLAFU). 2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Epidemiology, stone analysis and composition. Progres en urologie: J de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie. 2023;33(14):737–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2023.08.013.
4.
Anderson DJ, Kasson M, Patel M, Li N, Langenstroer P. Staple Line Erosion in a Neobladder Causing Postoperative Hematuria. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e15450. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15450.
5.
Albadawi H, Sener TE, Bin Hamri S. Surgical Clips Migration up to Renal Collecting System from Ileal Conduit Postcystectomy. J endourology case Rep. 2016;2(1):238–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2016.0121.
6.
Haddad FS, Campbell OP. Lithiasis in the ileal conduit and the continent urinary pouch: two cases and a review. Urol Int. 1992;49(2):114–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000282405.
7.
Liakos N, Mendrek MA, Karagiotis T, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Witt J. Staple Containing Ureteral Stone Formation After Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Neobladder Construction in a Female Patient: A Case Report of a Rare Complication. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e27712. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27712.
Total words in MS: 1282
Total words in Title: 13
Total words in Abstract: 0
Total Keyword count: 5
Total Images in MS: 1
Total Tables in MS: 0
Total Reference count: 7