Chemical analysis
The chemical analysis of volatiles revealed 18 compounds in the L. angustifolia oil and 13 in C. nardus. The primary compounds were linalool (1, 36.3%) and linalool acetate (2, 30.4%) in L. angustifolia, and citronellal (3, 45.8%) and geraniol (4, 22.3%) in C. nardus (Fig. 1, Table 1).
Table 1
Chemical compounds of Lavandula angustifolia and Cymbopogon nardus volatile.
|
EO
|
Compounds
|
ALC
|
AIL
|
CNEO
|
LAEO
|
|
1
|
α-thujone
|
922
|
924
|
0.1
|
-
|
|
2
|
α-pinene
|
930
|
932
|
–
|
2.7
|
|
4
|
β-pinene
|
971
|
974
|
–
|
0.2
|
|
5
|
α–terpinene
|
1015
|
1014
|
–
|
11.2
|
|
6
|
o-cymene
|
1019
|
1022
|
–
|
0.3
|
|
7
|
Limonene
|
1024
|
1024
|
0.9
|
-
|
|
8
|
trans-β-Ocimene
|
1032
|
1032
|
–
|
0.1
|
|
9
|
γ-terpinene
|
1055
|
1054
|
–
|
0.3
|
|
10
|
cis-linalool oxide
|
1064
|
1065
|
–
|
2.1
|
|
11
|
Terpinolene
|
1082
|
1086
|
–
|
0.5
|
|
12
|
Linalool
|
1093
|
1095
|
–
|
36.3
|
|
13
|
Allo-ocimene
|
1138
|
1140
|
–
|
1.0
|
|
15
|
Citronellal
|
1148
|
1148
|
45.8
|
-
|
|
14
|
Borneol
|
1167
|
1165
|
–
|
0.3
|
|
16
|
α-terpineol
|
1189
|
1186
|
–
|
2.9
|
|
19
|
Citronellol
|
1221
|
1223
|
11.4
|
-
|
|
17
|
Linalool acetate
|
1230
|
1231
|
–
|
30.4
|
|
21
|
Geraniol
|
1248
|
1249
|
22.3
|
-
|
|
26
|
Eugenol
|
1355
|
1356
|
2.5
|
-
|
|
20
|
Neryl acetate
|
1357
|
1359
|
–
|
4.6
|
|
27
|
Geraniol acetate
|
1378
|
1379
|
3.0
|
–
|
|
28
|
Methyl eugenol
|
1402
|
1403
|
–
|
–
|
|
30
|
β-caryophyllene
|
1415
|
1417
|
–
|
4.3
|
|
33
|
γ-gurjunene
|
1477
|
1477
|
1.5
|
-
|
|
29
|
γ-muurolene
|
1478
|
1478
|
–
|
1.3
|
|
34
|
Germacrene D
|
1485
|
1484
|
–
|
0.7
|
|
37
|
α-(E,E)-farnesene
|
1505
|
1505
|
0.4
|
–
|
|
25
|
Cadinene
|
1522
|
1522
|
–
|
0.2
|
|
38
|
Elemol
|
1548
|
1548
|
2.6
|
–
|
|
39
|
Germacrene-D-4-ol
|
1574
|
1574
|
1.9
|
–
|
|
41
|
epi-α-muurolol
|
1642
|
1642
|
1.2
|
–
|
|
43
|
α-cadinol
|
1652
|
1652
|
4.0
|
–
|
| |
Monoterpenes hydrocarbons
|
|
|
1.0
|
15.2
|
| |
Monoterpenes oxygenated
|
|
|
84.0
|
77.7
|
| |
Sesquiterpenes hydrocarbons
|
|
|
0.4
|
6.5
|
| |
Sesquiterpenes oxygenated
|
|
|
9.7
|
0.0
|
| |
Phenylpropanoid
|
|
|
2.5
|
0.0
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
97.6
|
99.4
|
*EO – elution order; AIC - Arithmetic index calculated; AIL – Arithmetic index literature; CNEO – Cymbopogon nardus volatile oil; LAEO –Lavandula angustifolia volatile oil.
The chemical compounds identified are consistent with those reported in the literature. Citronellal and geraniol are generally the main compounds in C. nardus (Andrade et al., 2012; Kaur et al., 2021), while linalool and linalool acetate are the primary compounds for L. angustifolia (Mantovani et al., 2013).
The ointment formulation used in the study was evaluated using physical-chemical stability and characterization tests. After 30 days of production, the homogeneous aspect characteristic of an oil-water phase (O/W) of the emulsion was verified without lumps, phase separation, or color change.
A
The formulations' physicochemical characterization presented satisfactory results in line with the Pharmacopoeia guidelines. Regarding pH, the most significant variations were observed between groups G1 and G3.
Stabilization studies are essential for guiding formulation development and selecting packaging components. It provides guidance on necessary improvements to the formulations. Assessing organoleptic and physicochemical stability is fundamental to ensuring product balance and safety (Chow et al., 2023). The tests showed that the product remained stable after 30 days, even after evaluations at various temperatures, including freezing and heating, and chemical characterization of the oils used. This process highlights the importance of care and safety in formulation development.
The topical wound treatment method allows for even distribution of the formulation across the wound bed, ensuring proper adhesion, protecting the site, reducing pain, and creating optimal conditions for healing (Lipsky and Hoey, 2014). The formulations were designed to match the skin's pH, which generally ranges from 4.5 to 5.8 and is closest to the natural skin pH (Jesus et al., 2021). In this study, all formulations showed acceptable pH levels in their analysis.
On the 9th day, a significant wound reduction of approximately 77.5% is observed in G2, followed by reductions of 62.5% in G4, 55% in G1, and 35% in G3. By the 12th day, G2 shows a lasting reduction of around 77% on average, while G4 exhibits a significant reduction of 82.5%, G1 decreases by 80%, and G3 decreases by 65% (Fig. 2).
The total wound healing time in the treated and control groups ranged from 17 to 21 days. The shortest healing time was observed in G4 (L. angustifolia + C. nardus 5%), while the longest was in G1 (L. angustifolia 5%). In addition to the healing duration, macroscopic features such as hyperemia, crusts, secretions, and hematomas were evaluated during and at the end of healing (Table 2).
Table 2
Macroscopic characteristics of the healing according to the days.
|
Group
|
Full healing (days)
|
Macroscopic features
|
|
G1
|
19
|
Marked hyperemia (vascularization), absence of secretion and crusts
|
|
G2
|
19
|
Mild hyperemia, but also with absence of secretion and crusts
|
|
G3
|
21
|
Mild hyperemia, presence of some crusts
|
|
G4
|
17
|
Marked hyperemia (vascularization), absence of secretion and crusts
|
|
G5
|
21
|
Discreet or absent hyperemia in some individuals, discreet secretion and bruises in others; 4.0 mm was missing for complete healing.
|
G1 – ointment based on Lavandula angustifolia 5%; G2 – ointment based on Cymbopogon nardus 5%; G3 – ointment based on Lavandula angustifolia + Cymbopogon nardus 2%; G4 - ointment based on Lavandula angustifolia + Cymbopogon nardus 5%; G5 – Control PBS.
The most significant reductions in wound size were visually observed on D6, D9, and D12. To better explain these observations, D8 was selected to compare the treated groups with the control group (G5). When using the formulation ointment of Lavandula angustifolia + Cymbopogon nardus 5% (G4), there was approximately a 35% reduction in wound size compared to the control group (G5).
Several factors, including vascular density, were evaluated in assessing histopathological parameters. The formulation used in group G4 showed the highest level of vascularization, which is vital for accelerating healing. In contrast, groups G1 and G2 exhibited moderate vascularization, while groups G3 and G5 showed mild vascularization.
Mononuclear cells were prominently observed in groups G1, G2, and G3, indicating a strong cellular defense response to potential antigens. In contrast, the cellular recruitment in the treated group G4 was moderate. For polymorphonuclear cells, there was slight recruitment in the treated groups G1, G2, and G4 and moderate recruitment in G3 and G5 (Fig. 3).
Fibroblasts were also identified. However, there was no difference among the groups in the relative abundance of fibroblast cells; all groups exhibited a moderate level of intensity.
The organization of collagen fibers in the wound-healing process is shown in Fig. 4. The treated group G1 showed a marked intensity, with fiber deposition forming acidophilic bundles that were densely packed; for the treated groups G2 and G4, the presence was moderate, with thick acidophilic fibers interspersed with areas of loose connective tissue and fibroblasts; and for the treated groups G3 and G5, the deposition of discrete fibers was observed, with fewer acidophilic fibers deposited in the fibroblast media. For all groups, re-epithelialization was mild (Fig. 4).
The use of complementary and alternative medicines and therapies (CAMs) has grown worldwide, and, as part of this trend, aromatherapy has become increasingly popular. Aromatherapy uses plant-derived volatiles, which can be applied in various ways for various health purposes. One reason for its increasing popularity is that these oils are generally less toxic and produce fewer side effects (Mori et al., 2016).
L. angustifolia + C. nardus 5% is a blend of volatiles, and numerous studies in human and veterinary literature have examined its active components, such as healing, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antifungal properties (Mori et al., 2016; Cunha et al., 2020). These active ingredients may have contributed to the higher concentration compared to L. angustifolia + C. nardus 2%, which has the same formulation but at a lower concentration. These factors may have favored the formulation that yielded the best healing outcomes.
From a macroscopic perspective of the response during treatment, the lesions in this group showed significant vascularization; therefore, increased blood supply benefits and a shorter healing time, as observed in 17 days. Histologically, the body's response to the formulation occurred through organized stages of the healing process, with moderate recruitment of the first line of defense—mononuclear cells—accompanied by only small numbers of lymphocytes and neutrophils, which are responsible for the immune response. These cells are attracted to a lesion in the endothelium to achieve hemostasis and then initiate the inflammation process (Heitman et al., 2018), but in an organized manner and without excess in response to this treatment.
A
Citronellal is one of the main compounds in
C. nardus volatile. Some studies on pain and inflammation report that this substance can reduce leukocyte migration and provide antioxidant effects (Heitman et al.,
2018) with low toxicity levels (Quintans-Júnior et al.,
2011). Among the few studies on the antimicrobial activity of
C. nardus volatile (Batubara et al.,
2015), it was observed that the minimum inhibitory concentration to inhibit microorganisms such as
S. aureus was 31.25 µg/mL;
E. coli was not inhibited at 250 µg/mL,
P. aeruginosa required 250 µg/mL, and
S. choleraesuis needed 125 µg/mL, indicating medium to high concentrations for inhibition. In the G2 formulation group (
C. nardus 5%), local pain was less intense compared to G3 (
L. angustifolia +
C. nardus 2%) and the control group, probably due to the ointment’s concentration level and the absence of macroscopically significant bacterial growth that could delay healing. The lesions showed slight hyperemia, no secretion or crusts, and histologically, the mononuclear cell response was moderate during the inflammatory phase.
In group G1, which received L. angustifolia at 5%, the animals exhibited calmer, less stressed behavior during the daily checklist manipulation than groups G3 (L. angustifolia + C. nardus 2%), G4 (L. angustifolia + C. nardus 5%), and G5 (control group). The animals in these treated groups were more agitated. Additionally, individuals in G1 showed less local pain when the ointment was applied. Lisboa et al. (2023) conducted a literature review on the use of L. angustifolia for pain relief in women. The review highlighted that volatiles are frequently used in hospital and outpatient settings due to their properties, which reduce local pain and provide calming effects. These benefits have been noted in various studies related to childbirth, menstrual cramps, and dysmenorrheasymptoms (Lisboa et al., 2023).
A
In the literature (Mori et al.,
2016)
, it was reported that in the group treated topically with
L. angustifolia oil, fibroblasts synthesized type III collagen, which is essential for the formation of granulation tissue during the early stages of wound healing. A greater number of P4H-positive fibroblasts accompanied this increase in collagen production. In comparison, the control group did not show these results. Additionally, RT-PCR analysis confirmed a significant increase in type I and type III collagen expression in the treatment group compared with the control group. This indicates that
L. angustifolia oil accelerates granulation tissue formation during the initial phase of wound healing. Among the treated groups, G1 showed the second-best collagenization, while G2 and G4 showed moderate responses, and G3 showed a mild response.
However, excess collagenization is also not beneficial, as observed by Ogawa et al. (2021), because when there are too many collagen cells, it can cause an accumulation of extracellular matrix that results in dermal nodules, and collagen becomes thick, eosinophilic, hyalinizing bundles. These are called keloidal collagen, which subsequently causes a pathology called keloids, an abnormal manifestation of healing, also driven by the increased durability of the connective tissue inflammation process.