Long-Range Ultrasonic Testing for Corrosion Monitoring in Oil and Gas Pipelines: A Case Study
Gherdaoui.
Hemza
1✉
Emailhemza.gherdaoui@gmail.com
Chihaoui.
Salim
1
Bouchelaghem.
Hadjira
1
Guenfoud
Salah
3
Benmohamed.
Hanene
4
Yallese.
Mohamed
Athmane
1
1A
A
A
Laboratory of Mechanics and Structures (LMS)
2
May 1945 University
P.O. Box 401
24000
Guelma
Algeria
3
LMANM Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Eng
4
Department of Electrical and Automatic Engineering
University of Guelma
Guelma
Algeria
Gherdaoui. Hemza 1,*, Chihaoui. Salim1, Bouchelaghem. Hadjira 1, Guenfoud Salah 2, Benmohamed. Hanene 3 and Yallese. Mohamed Athmane1
1
Laboratory of Mechanics and Structures (LMS), 8 May 1945 University, P.O. Box 401, Guelma 24000, Algeria
2
LMANM Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Eng. 8 May 1945 University, P.O. Box 401, Guelma 24000, Algeria
3
Department of Electrical and Automatic Engineering, University of Guelma, Guelma, Algeria
*E-mail address: hemza.gherdaoui@gmail.com
Abstract
Pipelines play a vital role in the safe and efficient transportation of hydrocarbons from production sites to processing centers and export terminals. Ensuring their structural integrity is therefore essential to maintain operational safety and protect the environment. However, these systems are often extensive, buried, or exposed to harsh conditions, which makes their inspection and corrosion monitoring particularly challenging.
This study focuses on the inspection and monitoring of corrosion in hydrocarbon transport pipelines using Long-Range Ultrasonic Testing (LRUT) technology. LRUT offers a non-destructive solution capable of detecting both internal and external corrosion over long distances, even in areas with limited accessibility. Its guided-wave approach enables comprehensive assessments without requiring direct access to every pipeline segment, making it especially suitable for large-scale and remote infrastructures.
Practical results obtained from field inspections conducted in the Hassi Berkine petroleum area are presented and discussed. The findings confirm the effectiveness of LRUT in identifying corrosion defects and assessing wall thickness variations, thereby enhancing the reliability and safety of oil and gas pipeline networks. This work demonstrates that integrating guided-wave ultrasonic techniques into pipeline monitoring programs can significantly improve proactive maintenance strategies, reduce the risk of failures, and support sustainable energy transport operations.
Keywords:
Pipeline inspection
Corrosion monitoring
Long-Range Ultrasonic Testing (LRUT)
Non-destructive testing (NDT)
Oil and gas infrastructure
Early corrosion detection
A
INTRODUCTION
A
Pipelines constitute the backbone of oil and gas transportation systems, ensuring the continuous and safe transfer of hydrocarbons from production fields to processing plants and export terminals. Due to their extensive length, aging infrastructure, and exposure to aggressive operating and environmental conditions, pipelines are particularly vulnerable to degradation mechanisms, among which corrosion remains the most critical and prevalent threat [
1–
3]. If left undetected or inadequately managed, corrosion can lead to wall thickness loss, leakage, environmental pollution, significant economic losses, and, in extreme cases, catastrophic failures endangering human lives [
4,
5].
Corrosion in oil and gas pipelines is a complex, multi-factor phenomenon influenced by transported fluids, operating pressure and temperature, material properties, and external environmental conditions such as soil composition, moisture, and microbial activity [6–8]. Various corrosion forms may occur simultaneously, including uniform corrosion, localized pitting corrosion, galvanic corrosion, and stress corrosion cracking, each presenting different inspection and mitigation challenges [9, 10]. In onshore and offshore environments alike, corrosion remains one of the leading causes of pipeline failure worldwide, accounting for a substantial percentage of reported incidents in integrity management databases [11].
Traditional corrosion inspection and monitoring methods, such as visual inspection, spot ultrasonic thickness measurements, radiography, and magnetic flux leakage, generally require direct access to the pipeline surface [12]. These approaches often involve excavation, insulation removal, or shutdown of operations, resulting in high inspection costs, extended downtime, and increased safety risks for inspection personnel [13]. Consequently, there is a growing demand within the oil and gas industry for advanced non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques capable of providing reliable, large-scale assessments while minimizing operational disruptions [14].
Long-Range Ultrasonic Testing (LRUT), also known as guided wave ultrasonic testing, has emerged as a powerful solution to address these limitations. Unlike conventional ultrasonic testing, LRUT employs low-frequency guided ultrasonic waves that propagate over long distances along the pipeline wall, enabling the detection of both internal and external defects from a single inspection location [15–17]. This capability makes LRUT particularly suitable for inspecting buried pipelines, road or river crossings, insulated sections, and areas with restricted access, where conventional inspection techniques are impractical or prohibitively expensive [18].
Over the past two decades, LRUT has gained increasing acceptance as a screening tool for pipeline integrity assessment. Numerous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in identifying corrosion-related metal loss, weld defects, and geometric anomalies, as well as in prioritizing locations for follow-up inspections using localized techniques [19–21]. When integrated into a comprehensive integrity management program, LRUT contributes significantly to proactive maintenance strategies, risk-based inspection planning, and life extension of aging pipeline assets [22].
In this context, the present study focuses on the application of Long-Range Ultrasonic Testing for corrosion monitoring of hydrocarbon transport pipelines in an operational oil field. A practical case study conducted in the Hassi Berkine (HBNS) petroleum area is presented, highlighting the capability of LRUT to detect, classify, and locate corrosion defects over long distances. The results obtained from field inspections are analyzed and validated through on-site verification, demonstrating the reliability and effectiveness of LRUT as a non-destructive technique for enhancing pipeline safety and integrity in the oil and gas industry.
DESCRIPTION OF THE CONDUCTED INSPECTION
The case study on corrosion detection in hydrocarbon pipelines using Long-Range Ultrasonic Testing technology (LRUT) was conducted through a practical inspection at the HBNS oil field. This field is located approximately 1100 km from Algiers, 300 km southeast of Hassi Messaoud, 114 km from the Tunisian border, and 160 km from the Libyan border. The HBNS field is operated by the Berkine Group, a joint venture between SONATRACH and the American Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, through its subsidiary ANADARKO Algeria Company LLC.
Definition of the Used Equipment (Hardware and Software)
LRUT Ring
This device is used to generate guided waves that propagate over long distances along the structure. The waves reflected by defects or irregularities (such as corrosion, cracks, or thickness loss) are captured by the same transducers or others located in the ring, enabling the location and evaluation of defects over extensive sections of the structure without requiring direct access or visual inspection along the entire length. [4]
Teletest MK4 Device
The Teletest MK4 is a specialized monitoring device based on LRUT technology, used for pipeline and structural inspection. It is designed to emit ultrasonic waves along the structure being inspected, detecting defects such as corrosion, cracks, or thickness loss. [6] The Teletest MK4 is equipped with multiple ultrasonic transducers arranged in a circular formation around the structure, forming a collar or sensor ring. These transducers emit ultrasonic waves that travel along the pipeline and capture the echoes reflected by defects or irregularities. By analyzing these echoes, the Teletest MK4 allows for the detection and evaluation of defects over long distances without requiring direct access to the entire structure, making it a valuable tool for preventive maintenance and pipeline
Teletest Wavescan 2.5
Teletest Wavescan 2.5 is an advanced software tool used in industry for non-destructive inspection of various materials and components. With its ability to detect small defects and provide detailed analyses, this device plays a crucial role in ensuring product quality and preventing potential failures. [1]
INSPECTION OF THE 10" COLLECTION LINE, "10 INCH OLD" TOWARDS FGSS-01WORK STEPS
The inspection was conducted on the pipeline named "10 INCH Old FGSS-01" with the following characteristics:
Nominal thickness: 8.74 mm
Line marker: 10 INCH Old FGSS-01
Transported fluid: Crude oil
Operating pressure: 9 bars
The purpose of the inspection was to assess the integrity of the pipeline in service by monitoring the general condition of the line to detect any metal loss due to corrosion or erosion.
The LRUT Ring (Guided Wave Collar) was installed on the pipeline designated "10 INCH Old FGSS-01," as shown in Figure .5.
Subsequently, the pipeline inspection data was input into the software, and the guided wave scanning operation was initiated over a length of 52 meters in both directions.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results obtained using guided wave technology are presented in the graph in Figure.6.
After scanning 52 meters, we obtained the graph shown in Fig. 6, which appears on the LRUT instrument screen as a signal composed of three different colors (black, blue, and red). These signals represent the reflection of energy by obstacles on the pipeline surface.
The LRUT indications were primarily classified into categories 1, 2, and 3, corresponding to "Minor," "Moderate," and "Severe" levels of amplitude, respectively. The Distance Amplitude Correction (DAC) curve was used to assess the category. This curve allows the plotting of amplitude variations of circumferential reflectors (typically welds) at different distances from the guided wave collar [1].
The DAC curves were superimposed on the LRUT indications for category evaluation:
Category 1: Responses below the green line.
Category 2: Responses below the red line.
Category 3: Responses exceeding the red line.
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
From the LRUT graph in Fig. 6, equidistant peaks composed of three colors are observed, indicating circumferential obstacles with distances equal to the length of a pipe section. These peaks can be interpreted as weld joint indications. This observation aligns with the actual physical conditions verified on-site.
Additionally, two other peaks are noted at positions − 20.41 meters in the negative direction and − 7.64 meters in the negative direction. These two peaks are classified as Category 1 reflections, as their amplitude is below the green reference line on the DAC curve.
Furthermore, two more peaks are identified at positions 16.53 meters and 18.57 meters in the positive direction. These two peaks are classified as Category 3 reflections, as their amplitude exceeds the red reference line on the DAC curve.
For external corrosion, a pit gauge was used to confirm the maximum depth of the pits, as shown in Fig. 7.
The following table summarizes the interpretation of the LRUT graph for the "10 INCH Old FGSS-01" line:
The following table summarizes the interpretation of the LRUT graph for the "10 INCH Old FGSS-01" line:
A
Table 1
Interpretation of Results.
|
Position Relative to Guided Wave Collar
|
Description of Indication
|
Comments
|
Priority
|
|
-36.82m
|
Weld
|
|
|
|
-24.78m
|
Weld
|
|
|
|
-20.41m
|
Cat. 1
|
Minor external corrosion with a thick external layer
|
Low
|
|
-12.34m
|
Weld
|
|
|
|
-7.64m
|
Cat. 1
|
Minor external corrosion with a thick layer
|
Low
|
|
0.00m
|
Weld
|
|
|
|
12.48m
|
Weld
|
|
|
|
16.53m
|
Cat. 3
|
Severe generalized external corrosion with several large pits in the lower half of the pipeline, with a maximum recorded depth of 3.16 mm
|
High
|
|
18.57m
|
Cat. 3
|
Severe generalized external corrosion with several large pits in the lower half of the pipeline, with a maximum recorded depth of 4.17 mm
|
High
|
|
25.14m
|
Weld
|
|
|
VERIFICATION OF THE OBTAINED RESULTS
The on-site verification of the results obtained through LRUT technology for inspecting corrosion on the "10 INCH Old FGSS-01" pipeline demonstrated complete alignment with the actual physical conditions observed in the field. This includes the identification of weld joints and the detection of corrosion at the same locations and severity levels indicated by the LRUT data. These findings underscore the reliability of the results provided by this technology, which proves to be a powerful tool for long-distance defect detection. It enables a comprehensive assessment of pipeline conditions without requiring direct access to each segment, offering significant advantages for monitoring the integrity of hydrocarbon pipelines.
CONCLUsions
Long-Range Ultrasonic Testing (LRUT) technology offers a highly effective and reliable solution for monitoring pipeline corrosion in oil fields. This paper has emphasized the significance of LRUT through a case study conducted at the HBNS oil field, operated by the Berkine Group. The use of LRUT allowed for precise detection of anomalies, such as weld joints and corrosion, over long pipeline distances without the need for direct access to every segment.
The analysis of the results revealed a complete correlation between the actual site conditions and the data collected via LRUT, further validating the technology’s reliability and effectiveness. The use of the DAC curve enabled accurate classification of detected anomalies, facilitating a detailed evaluation of defect severity.
In conclusion, LRUT technology is a vital tool for proactive maintenance and pipeline safety in the oil and gas industry. By providing comprehensive insights into pipeline integrity over long distances, it significantly reduces the risk of failures and supports the safe and efficient operation of oil infrastructure..
A
A
A
Acknowledgement
We express our sincere gratitude to the Berkine Group for their invaluable support and cooperation, providing the necessary resources and access to their facilities, which made this work possible.
REFERENCES
1.Ameh ES, Ikpeseni SC, Lawal LS (2018) A review of field corrosion control and monitoring techniques of the upstream oil and gas pipelines. Nigerian J Technol Dev 14(2):67–75. https://doi.org/10.4314/njtd.v14i2.5
2.Nagalakshmi T, Sivasakthi A, Prasad VVS (2019) Corrosion control, prevention and mitigation in oil & gas industry. Int J Innovative Technol Exploring Eng (IJITEE) 9(2):1568–1572
3.El-Lateef HMA, Abbasov VM, Aliyeva LI, Ismayilov TA (2012) COâ‚‚ corrosion of carbon steel pipelines: A review, International Journal of Corrosion, vol. Article ID 861024, 2012
4.Wasim M, Djukic MB (2022) External corrosion of oil and gas pipelines: A review of failure mechanisms and predictive prevention methods. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 100:104467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104467
5.Karami M (2012) Review of corrosion role in gas pipelines and methods for prevention. J Press Vessel Technol 134(5):054501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006124
6.Bharatiya U, Gal P, Agrawal A, Shah M, Sircar A (2019) Effect of corrosion on crude oil and natural gas pipelines with emphasis on prevention by eco-friendly corrosion inhibitors. J Bio- Tribo-Corrosion 5(2):35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-019-0225-9
7.Winston Revie R, Uhlig HH (2008) Corrosion and Corrosion Control: An Introduction to Corrosion Science and Engineering, 4th edn. Wiley, New York
8.Roberge PR (2012) Handbook of Corrosion Engineering, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
9.Turnbull A (2010) Stress corrosion cracking mechanisms in carbon steel pipelines. Corros Sci 52(10):3435–3446
10.Baker MA Jr (2014) Pipeline Integrity Management, 2nd edn. Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford
11.Nestleroth B, Davis RJ (2004) Application of guided wave ultrasonic testing for pipeline inspection. Mater Eval 62(3):241–246
12.Cawley P, Alleyne D (1996) The use of Lamb waves for the long range inspection of large structures. Ultrasonics 34:2–5
13.Rose JL (2014) Ultrasonic Guided Waves in Solid Media. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14.Lowe MJS, Alleyne DN, Cawley P (1998) Defect detection in pipes using guided waves. Ultrasonics 36:1–5
A
15.Alleyne D, Pavlakovic B, Lowe M, Cawley P (2001) Rapid, long range inspection of chemical plant pipework using guided waves. Insight – Non-Destructive Test Condition Monit 43(2):93–101