Lead-Xianpu
Song
1
Wenbin
Co-auther
1
Gao
1✉
Email82753492@qq.com
Yuman
Xing
2
Email303614902@qq.com
Lili
Liang
2
Yanhua
Feng
1,3,4
1A
A
A
Emergency Surgery Department of Hebei Children’s Hospital
China
2
Emergency Department of Hebei Children’s Hospital
China
3
Children’s Hospital
No. 133 Jianhua South Street, Chang’an District
Shijiazhuang
Hebei Province
China
4A
Affiliation institution Emergency Surgery Department of Hebei Children’s Hospital
Lead-Author Xianpu Song
Emergency Surgery Department of Hebei Children's Hospital, China;303614902@qq.com
Co-auther Wenbin Gao
Emergency Surgery Department of Hebei Children's Hospital, China;82753492@qq.com
Second author Yuman Xing
Emergency Department of Hebei Children's Hospital,China;
Third author Lili Liang
Emergency Department of Hebei Children's Hospital,China;
Third author Yanhua Feng
Emergency Surgery Department of Hebei Children's Hospital,China;
Corresponding author: Wenbin Gao
Address Hebei Children's Hospital, No. 133 Jianhua South Street, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province China
Affiliation institution Emergency Surgery Department of Hebei Children's Hospital
Affiliation 82753492@qq.com
Contact Number 8618503299896
Disclaimer
A
All participants were provided with information regarding the study and gave their written informed consent prior to participation.
A
This study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all applicable ethical guidelines.
A
Family members knew the purpose and content of the study, and signed an informed consent form after clarifying the relevant risks.
A
This study was reviewed and approved by the Hebei Children's hospital ethics committee.
A
Abstract
Background
Compound injuries in children are the leading cause of death and disability, and early and accurate assessment is crucial to optimize treatment. This study aimed to explore the clinical value of pediatric trauma score (PTS) combined with blood lactate measurement in the triage, treatment guidance and prognosis prediction of children's compound injuries.
Methods
A
A
From January 2023 to December 2024, a prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled trial was conducted in the emergency department of Hebei Provincial Children's Hospital (the only tertiary pediatric medical center in Hebei Province), China. A total of 546 children with combined injuries who visited the hospital were included and randomly divided into the intervention group (n = 273, managed by PTS combined with dynamic monitoring of blood lactate) and the control group (n = 273, managed by PTS only). The main outcome indicators are the timeliness of rescue (time to critical intervention) and the accuracy of prognosis prediction (predictive effectiveness of mortality and major complications). Secondary outcomes included emergency department length of stay, unplanned ICU admission, and 30-day complication rate.
Results
The median time from admission to initiation of key interventions was significantly shorter in the intervention group compared with the control group (45 [IQR: 30–65] minutes vs. 68 [IQR: 45–95] minutes, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the combined indicator (PTS + initial lactate) to predict 30-day mortality was 0.936 (95% CI: 0.902–0.970), which was significantly higher than PTS alone (AUC: 0.812, P < 0.001) or initial lactate (AUC: 0.855, P = 0.002). The emergency stay time, unplanned ICU admission rate and 30-day complication rate of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group (all P < 0.05). Dynamic monitoring showed that 6-hour lactate clearance < 30% was a strong independent predictor of the occurrence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (OR = 5.42, 95% CI: 2.88–10.21, P < 0. 001)。
Conclusion
The combined application of PTS and blood lactate integrates physiological status and metabolic information, which can significantly improve the accuracy of early triage of children's compound injuries, guide the implementation of rescue measures, and effectively predict prognosis through dynamic monitoring, providing a reliable basis for precise individual management.
Keywords:
pediatric trauma score
blood lactate
combined injuries in children
prognosis
clinical decision-making
randomized controlled trial
A
A
A
A
A
1. Introduction
Child accidental injuries have become one of the leading causes of death and acquired disability among children worldwide, especially in developing countries[1, 2]. Among various types of injuries, high-energy injuries are the main ones that pose a threat to the lives of children. According to statistics in the United States in 2004, deaths caused by trauma accounted for 59.5% of the total mortality of children under 18 years old [18]. According to data from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, from 2010 to 2015, the main cause of death among adolescents under the age of 19 was accidental injuries, accounting for 40%-50% of all deaths [3]. At the same time, China's child population accounts for 12. 9%[14], ranking second in the world, so how to reduce accidental injuries to children is an urgent problem that needs to be solved. Therefore, how to conduct early, rapid and accurate assessment in this critical situation, thereby optimizing treatment strategies and efficiently allocating limited medical resources, is the core challenge facing pediatric emergency departments.
Traditional trauma scoring systems, such as the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) [4] designed specifically for children, provide clinicians with a relatively objective injury severity grading tool by quantitatively assessing children's weight, airway status, systolic blood pressure (adjusted for age), state of consciousness, wounds and fractures. Although data on each parameter of the trauma score is easy to obtain, it is easily affected by various internal and external factors, thus affecting the timeliness of triage and rescue [5]. A large number of studies have confirmed that reduced PTS scores are significantly associated with increased childhood trauma mortality [6]. However, PTS mainly relies on immediate clinical manifestations, and its sensitivity is relatively insufficient for latent shock or early cellular metabolism abnormalities that have not yet shown obvious physiological signs. Therefore, reference of clinical manifestations and biochemical information together may be a more reliable tool for assessing mortality risk in trauma patients [7, 8]. There is an urgent clinical need for objective biomarkers that can supplement insufficient PTS and reflect changes in the internal microenvironment of the body.
Blood lactate, as a key product of tissue hypoxia and anaerobic cell metabolism, increases in blood lactate levels during shock, severe tissue damage, or hypoperfusion [9]. In the field of pediatric trauma, studies have confirmed the direct relationship between initial blood lactate level, lactate clearance rate and death [10]. Especially when the blood lactate concentration is ≥ 5 mmol/L, the risk of death increases sharply, suggesting the need to immediately initiate higher-level rescue intervention.More importantly, compared with a single measurement, dynamic changes in lactate levels (such as lactate clearance) have a higher prognostic value, and their downward trend directly reflects the effectiveness of resuscitation treatment and the repayment of tissue oxygen debt [11].
In recent years, strategies that combine traditional scoring systems with biomarkers such as blood lactate have shown great potential in adult and some pediatric studies. For example, studies in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) have shown that the combined initial lactate and PRISM III score has a better predictive value for childhood trauma mortality than either single index [11]. These evidences strongly suggest that combining PTS with blood lactate measurement is expected to build a more comprehensive assessment system. To test this hypothesis, we designed and implemented this prospective randomized controlled trial to systematically evaluate the clinical significance of this combined strategy in improving the accuracy of triage, timeliness of rescue, treatment guidance value, and accuracy of prognosis prediction.
2. Materials and Methods
2. 1 Research design and setting
A
This study was a prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled trial conducted in the emergency department of the only tertiary pediatric medical center in Hebei Province, China. The study period is from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024.
A
The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital (approval number: 202301-03), and the parents or legal guardians of all participating children signed written informed consent.
2. 2 Research objects
Inclusion criteria: (1) Age 0–14 years old; (2) Compound injuries (defined as injuries involving two or more anatomical parts) caused by traffic injuries (including passengers in motor vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycle/electric vehicle accidents); (3) Sent to the emergency department of our hospital within 24 hours after the injury.
Exclusion criteria: (1) known to have inborn metabolic diseases (such as mitochondrial disease); (2) combined with severe chronic underlying diseases (such as end-stage renal disease, severe heart failure); (3) declared dead before hospital; (4) parents refused to participate in this study.
2. 3 Randomization and blinding
A computer-generated random number table was used to select 546 children who met the inclusion criteria as follows: 1 were randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group. The random allocation plan was concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of the clinicians and nurses responsible for the management of the children was not possible. However, researchers responsible for outcome assessment (eg, review of medical records to identify complications, conduct of follow-up telephone calls) and statistical analysis of data were blinded to group assignment to minimize measurement bias.
2. 4 Interventions
A
Control group (n = 273): Children undergo standard trauma assessment and management procedures from the time of admission. The algorithm is entirely based on the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS). PTS is assessed and calculated immediately upon arrival by the triage nurse and the receiving physician. The PTS scoring criteria are shown in Table
1.
A
According to the established plan of our center, advanced trauma life support procedures are initiated for children with PTS ≤ 8 points. Intervention group (n = 273): Children received a comprehensive management program based on the combined measurement of PTS and blood lactate. While completing the PTS assessment, complete the first blood lactate test (L0) via arterial blood collection (preferred) or venous blood collection within 10 minutes of the child's arrival in the emergency room. The decision tree of the joint management plan is shown in Fig. 1. Specifically, meeting any of the following conditions will trigger the accelerated clinical pathway: ① PTS ≤ 8 points; ② Initial blood lactate ≥ 2.5 mmol/L. This path includes immediately notifying senior emergency physicians and trauma team leaders to arrive on scene, preparing resuscitation fluids and blood products in advance, and prioritizing imaging examinations. In addition, blood lactate levels were measured repeatedly at 2 and 6 hours (L2, L6) after the initial blood collection. The lactate clearance calculation formula is: [ (L0 - L2) / L0 ] × 100%. If the lactate clearance rate at 2 hours is < 10% or the lactate value at 6 hours is still > 2. 0 mmol/L, initiate a treatment re-evaluation process, including consideration of more in-depth volume status assessment (such as ultrasound), adjustment of fluid resuscitation regimen, or early transfer to ICU.
Table 1
Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) System[20]
|
Parameter
|
+ 2分
|
+ 1分
|
-1分
|
|
Weight(kg)
|
> 20
|
10–20
|
< 10
|
|
Airway status
|
Normal
|
Sustainable
|
Unable to sustain/Need intubation
|
|
Systolicbloodpressure(mmHg)
|
> 90
|
50–90
|
< 50
|
|
State of consciousness
|
Sober
|
Dull/Blurred consciousness
|
Unconscious
|
|
Open wound
|
None
|
Slightly
|
Major/Penetrating injury
|
|
Fracture
|
None
|
Closure/Suspected
|
Openness/Multiple
|
| *Note: Total score range is -6 to + 12 points. * |
| Abbreviations |
| The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript: |
2. 5 Observation Indicators
Main outcome measures:
1.
1.Timeliness of rescue: Record the time (minutes) from emergency admission to the start of key interventions. Key interventions include initiating a massive transfusion protocol, performing emergency surgery (eg, exploratory laparotomy, decompressive craniotomy), and performing invasive mechanical ventilation due to hemodynamic instability.
2.
2. Prognostic prediction accuracy: Evaluate the predictive ability of different indicators (PTS, initial lactate, and the combination of the two) for 30-day mortality and major complications (defined as multiple organ dysfunction syndrome MODS) in children, and compare them through the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) and the area under the curve (AUC).
Secondary outcome measures:
3.
1. Emergency stay time (hours).
4.
2. Unplanned ICU admission rate (%): refers to the proportion of cases that were planned to be admitted to the general ward after initial evaluation, but needed to be transferred to the ICU due to worsening of the condition within 24 hours.
5.
3. 30-day complication rate (%): including sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute kidney injury (AKI), etc.
6.
4. 30-day all-cause mortality (%).
7.
2. 6 Statistical analysis
Table 1
Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) System
|
Parameter
|
+ 2分
|
+ 1分
|
-1分
|
|
Weight(kg)
|
> 20
|
10–20
|
< 10
|
|
Airway status
|
Normal
|
Sustainable
|
Unable to sustain/Need intubation
|
|
Systolicbloodpressure(mmHg)
|
> 90
|
50–90
|
< 50
|
|
State of consciousness
|
Sober
|
Dull/Blurred consciousness
|
Unconscious
|
|
Open wound
|
None
|
Slightly
|
Major/Penetrating injury
|
|
Fracture
|
None
|
Closure/Suspected
|
Openness/Multiple
|
| *Note: Total score range is -6 to + 12 points. * |
Using SPSS 26.0 and R language (4.0. 2 version) for statistical analysis. Measurement data that conform to normal distribution are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and the independent samples t test is used for comparison between groups; non-normally distributed data are expressed as median (interquartile range, IQR), and Mann-Whitney U test is used for comparison between groups. Enumeration data were expressed as the number of cases (percentage), and comparisons between groups were performed using the χ² test or Fisher's exact test. ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive performance of each indicator, and the DeLong test was used to compare the AUC differences of different ROC curves.
clinical decision making process
Evaluate PTS and initial lactate (L0) immediately after admission. If PTS ≤ 8 or L0 ≥ 2.5 mmol/L, the "accelerated path" will be triggered immediately, advanced life support will be given, a green channel will be opened for examination and treatment, and dynamic monitoring will be performed at the same time. If PTS ≥ 8 or L0 ≤ 2.5 mmol/L, follow the normal procedure. Repeat the lactate test at 2 hours (L2) and 6 hours (L6), and calculate the 2-hour lactate clearance rate. If the 2-hour clearance rate is < 10% or L6 > 2. 0 mmol/L, the treatment needs to be re-evaluated, the treatment plan should be adjusted in real time, and early transfer to the ICU should be considered. If the 2-hour lactate clearance rate is normal, the current treatment should be continued.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the independent risk factors affecting prognosis, and the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. All statistical analyzes were two-sided tests, with P < 0. 05 means the difference is statistically significant.
3.Result
3. 1 Comparison of baseline data
During the study period, a total of 580 children were screened, and finally 546 cases were included in the analysis, including 273 cases in the intervention group and the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of children in terms of age, gender, injury mechanism distribution, PTS score on admission, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and other baseline data (P > 0. 05), indicating that the randomized groups are well balanced (Table 2).
Table 2
Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of children
|
Attribute
|
Intervention group(n = 273)
|
Control group(n = 273)
|
Statistic
|
P value
|
|
Age (year), M (IQR)
|
6.5 (3.0–10.0)
|
7.0 (3.5–10.5)
|
Z = -0.891
|
0.373
|
|
Male, n (%)
|
172 (63.0%)
|
165 (60.4%)
|
χ² = 0.402
|
0.526
|
|
Damage mechanism, n (%)
|
|
|
χ² = 1.205
|
0.752
|
|
Pedestrian collision
|
145 (53.1%)
|
138 (50.5%)
|
|
|
|
Passengers in the c
|
98 (35.9%)
|
105 (38.5%)
|
|
|
|
Bicycle/electric vehicle
|
30 (11.0%)
|
30 (11.0%)
|
|
|
|
On admissionPTS, M (IQR)
|
7 (5–9)
|
7 (5–9)
|
Z = -0.456
|
0.648
|
|
On admissionGCS, M (IQR)
|
13 (9–15)
|
14 (10–15)
|
Z = -1.123
|
0.261
|
|
Initial lactate (mmol/L), M (IQR)
|
3.8 (2.5–5.5)
|
3.6 (2.4–5.2)
|
Z = -1.104
|
0.270
|
3. 2 Main outcome measures
3.2. 1 Timeliness of rescue
The median time from admission to key intervention was significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the control group (45 minutes [IQR: 30–65] vs. 68 minutes [IQR:45–95], Z = -5.892, P < 0. 001)。
3.2. 2 Accuracy of prognostic prediction
By the end of the study, a total of 28 children (5.1%) had died. When comparing PTS with initial lactate alone, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.215). In terms of predicting the occurrence of MODS, the joint indicator also showed the highest predictive value (AUC: 0. 915)。
Table 3
ROC curve analysis results of each indicator predicting 30-day mortality
|
Predictive indicators
|
AUC
|
95% CI
|
Best Truncation Value
|
Sensitivity
|
Specificity
|
P value (vs. joint indicator)
|
|
PTS
|
0.812
|
0.750–0.874
|
≤ 5
|
0.821
|
0.734
|
< 0.001
|
|
Initial lactate
|
0.855
|
0.798–0.912
|
≥ 4.5 mmol/L
|
0.786
|
0.802
|
0.002
|
|
Joint indicator
|
0.936
|
0.902–0.970
|
-
|
0.893
|
0.857
|
-
|
3. 3. Secondary outcome measures
The intervention group showed significant advantages in all secondary outcome indicators (Table 4). The intervention group had a shorter median length of stay in the emergency department, a significantly lower rate of unplanned ICU admission and any complication within 30 days than the control group.
3. 4. In-depth analysis of the relationship between dynamic monitoring of lactate and prognosis
We conducted an in-depth analysis of the data from the intervention group, focusing on the value of lactate clearance. Children in the intervention group were divided into high clearance group (≥ 30%) and low clearance group (< 30%) according to whether the 6-hour lactate clearance rate reached 30%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted for age, gender, initial PTS and initial lactate) showed that 6-hour lactate clearance < 30% was a strong independent predictor of MODS in children (adjusted OR = 5.42, 95% CI: 2.88–10.21, P < 0. 001)。
Table 4
Comparison of secondary outcome indicators between the two groups of children
|
Indicator
|
Intervention group(n = 273)
|
Control group (n = 273)
|
Statistic
|
P value
|
|
Emergency stay time (hours), M (IQR)
|
4.5 (3.0-6.5)
|
5.8 (4.0–8.0)
|
Z = -4.123
|
< 0.001
|
|
Unplanned ICU stay, n (%)
|
15 (5.5%)
|
32 (11.7%)
|
χ² = 6.714
|
0.010
|
|
30 day complications, n (%)
|
45 (16.5%)
|
68 (24.9%)
|
χ² = 6.125
|
0.013
|
|
Sepsis
|
18 (6.6%)
|
25 (9.2%)
|
|
|
|
ARDS
|
12 (4.4%)
|
20 (7.3%)
|
|
|
|
AKI
|
15 (5.5%)
|
23 (8.4%)
|
|
|
|
30 day mortality rate, n (%)
|
11 (4.0%)
|
17 (6.2%)
|
χ² = 1.363
|
0.243
|
4.Discuss
This study confirms that combining the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) with blood lactate measurement has a significant synergistic effect in the treatment and management of children's combined injuries. This joint strategy is an effective plan that can directly guide clinical actions and optimize the treatment process.
First, this study found that this joint strategy greatly improved the timeliness of rescue. Time from admission to critical intervention was significantly reduced in the intervention group 35% (45 minutes vs. 68 minutes). This is due to the clear and objective trigger conditions set in the combination protocol (PTS ≤ 8 or lactate ≥ 2.5 mmol/L). Because when the blood lactate concentration exceeds 2.0 mmol/L, it is difficult for the liver to clear it, and if it exceeds 4. The mortality rate of children increased significantly at 0 mmol/L [12]. Some children may have acceptable PTS scores but already have hyperlactatemia caused by tissue hypoperfusion, which is called "occult shock." Using PTS alone, the risks of such children may be underestimated and intervention delayed. Our joint solution can identify these children early and allow them to enter the green treatment channel in advance. This is a good application of the precision medicine concept in the field of emergency trauma [13].
Secondly, in terms of prognostic prediction accuracy, the combined index shows its better advantages. Its AUC for predicting mortality is as high as 0. 936, which is an excellent prediction level and significantly better than any single indicator. This verifies our core hypothesis: PTS assesses injury from a macro-physiological level, while blood lactate reflects the degree of criticality within the body from a micro-metabolic level. The combination of the two provides a more comprehensive assessment strategy, allowing clinicians to identify earlier and more accurately high-risk children who appear to be stable but are actually critical.
Furthermore, our analysis of dynamic monitoring of lactate revealed its enormous value beyond initial values. A 6-hour lactate clearance < 30% was identified as a strong independent risk factor for MODS (OR > 5). At the same time, previous studies have suggested that there is a positive correlation between severe hyperlactatemia, lactate clearance and mortality in critically ill patients [16]. This finding is highly consistent with the concept of “lactate-guided resuscitation” in critical care medicine [17]. Initial lactate levels reflect the severity of tissue damage, while lactate clearance dynamically reveals the body's ability to respond to treatment. Persistent hyperlactatemia is a strong warning sign that initial resuscitation is inadequate or that persistent bleeding or ischemia exists, requiring immediate re-evaluation of treatment strategies. This study successfully integrates this concept into the early management of pediatric trauma and demonstrates its effectiveness through data.
In terms of clinical outcomes, the combined management strategy brought about comprehensive improvements. The shorter emergency stay time and lower unplanned ICU admission rate in the intervention group illustrate that this strategy improves the accuracy of initial triage and treatment and avoids subsequent confusion and resource loss caused by inaccurate disease judgment,Source wasted. At the same time, the significantly lower 30-day complication rate may be related to earlier and more effective initial resuscitation, as well as timely treatment adjustments based on lactate trends, thereby preventing further deterioration of organ function.
This study also has some limitations. The single-center design may limit the generalizability of the results, requiring external validation in hospitals at different levels and in different regions. Second, although blinded assessments were implemented, the treatment team was not blinded, potentially introducing potential performance bias. In addition, we mainly used arterial/venous blood to detect lactate. In the future, we can explore the feasibility of using bedside fingertip blood lactate detectors in this solution to further improve convenience.
5.In conclusion
The conclusions of this study are as follows: In the clinical treatment of children with compound injuries, using a comprehensive management strategy of pediatric trauma score (PTS) combined with blood lactate measurement can significantly shorten rescue response time and improve treatment efficiency compared to using PTS alone. Greatly improve the accuracy of early prediction of death and serious complications. By dynamically monitoring lactate clearance, we can effectively evaluate treatment response, guide the adjustment of resuscitation strategies, and improve patient prognosis. Therefore, we strongly recommend the combined application of PTS and blood lactate (especially dynamic monitoring) as a standardized assessment and management process for children with complex injuries in pediatric trauma centers and qualified emergency departments, in order to achieve more precise individualized treatment and ultimately reduce the mortality and disability rates of children.
Future prospects: Follow-up research can focus on developing machine learning prediction models that integrate PTS, lactate, and even other new biomarkers (such as procalcitonin), that is, artificial intelligence technology. Because artificial intelligence technology has unique advantages in identifying data associations and computing speed, it has become a potential solution to many clinical problems [15]. In order to achieve earlier risk warning. At the same time, it is also important to verify the applicability of this combined strategy in a broader pediatric trauma population (e.g., fall injuries, burns).
Chart list
Table 1. Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) System
Table 2. Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of children
Table 3. ROC curve analysis results of each indicator predicting 30-day mortality
Table 4. Comparison of secondary outcome indicators between the two groups of children
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
|
PTS
|
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
|
|
IQR
|
Directory of open access journals
|
|
MODS
|
Three letter acronym
|
|
AUC
|
Linear dichroism
|
|
GCS
|
GCS
|
|
ARDS
|
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
|
|
AKI
|
Acute Kidney Injury
|
|
PRISM III
|
Pediatric Risk of Mortality III
|
|
CI
|
Confidence interval
|
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material
A
A
Author Contribution
Conceptualization, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation S.X.P. Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision, G.W.B.Data collection and analysis L.L.L and X.Y.M,Editing, supervision and data organization F,Y,H.All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
1.Lao Z, Gifford M, Dalal K (2012) Economic cost of childhood unintentional injuries. Int J Prev Med 3:303–312 [Pub Med]
2.GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators (2020) Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: asystematic analysis for the Globa lBurden of Disease Study 2019 [J]. Lancet 396(10258):1204–1222 [Pub Med]
3.Wang Linhong D, Leilei C, Minyan (2017) Review report on the prevalence of injuries among children and adolescents in China[M]. People's Health Electronic Audio and Video Publishing House. [Pub Med]
4.Tepas JR, Mollitt DL, Talbert JL et al (1987) The pediatric trauma score as a predictor of injury severity in the injured child[J]. J Pediatr Surg 22(1):14–18 [Pub Med]
5.NAKHJAVAN S B,YOUSEFIFARD M,HAJIGHANBARI M J et al Worthing physiological score vs revised trauma score in outcome prediction of trauma patients;a comparative study[J].Emerg (Tehran),2017,5(1):e31.[Pub Med]
6.Attia S, Elzehery R, Ahmed M et al (2021) Lactate Clearance Vs Revised Trauma Score Egypt. J Hosp Med 83(1):1068–1074 160874.[Pub Med]
7.JEONG JH, PARK Y J, KIM D H et al (2017) The new trauma score (NTS):a modification of the revised trauma score for better trauma mortality prediction[J]. BMC Surg 17(1):77 [Pub Med]
8.WEEKS SR, STEVENS K A, HAIDER A H et al A modified Kampala trauma score(KTS)effectively predicts mortality in trauma patients [J]. Injury 2016, 47(1):125–129.[Pub Med]
9.Noparatkailas N, Inchai J, Deesomchok A (2023) Blood Lactate Level and the Predictor of Death in Non-shock Septic Patients. INDIAN J CRIT CARE M 27(2):93–100. 10. 5005/jp-journals-10071-24404. [Pub Med]
10.Çele e n M (2023) Çele e n K. Lactate clearance as an early prognostic marker of mortality for pediatric trauma. Klin Padiatr 235:270 6.[Pub Med]
11.Özel A, lbe i EN, Yüce S (2025) Predictive value of initial lactate levels for mortality and morbidity in critically ill pediatric trauma patients: a retrospective study from a Turkish pediatric intensive care unit. ACUTE CRIT CARE. ; 40 ACUTE CRIT CARE. doi: 10.4266/acc. 003528.[Pub Med]
12.Bui B Clinical Diabetes Mellitus and Serum Lactate Blood Glucose Elevation in Children's Blood Blood Glucose Elevation jcmhch.2024;(96):10.38103/jcmhch.96. 10.[Pub Med]
13.Mugo M (2024) The Role of Precision Medicine in Autoimmune Diseases. 3(2):5–9 doi: 10. 59298/rojphm/2024/325902.[Pub Med]
14.Yang H, Wang H, Cao C (2019) Incidence patterns of traumatic upper limb fractures in children and adolescents: Data from medical university-affiliated hospitals in Chongqing. China Med 98:e17299 [Pub Med]
15.Badnjevic A, Avdihodzic H, Gurbeta P, L.ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL DEVICES: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE[J]. Danub,2021,33(Suppl 3):S336–S341.[Pub Med]
16.Pramono A, Aristya Nur D, Atsani N et al (2025) Association of Lactate Levels and Mortality in Intensive Care Units. 6(12). 10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i12. 12092.[Pub Med]
17.KIYATKIN M E BAKKERJ Lactate and microcirculation as suitable targets forhemodynamic optimization in resuscitation of circulatory shock[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care 2017, 23(4): 348–354.[Pub Med]
18.American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Orthopaedics, Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Section on Critical Care et al.Management of pediatric trauma.Pediatrics et al (2008) 121(4): 849.[Pub Med]
19.Mamandipoor B, Majd M, Moz M et al (2020) Blood Lactate Concentration Prediction in Critical Care[J]. Stud Health Technol Inf 16(270):73 [Pub Med]
|
PTS
|
Pediatric Trauma Score
|
|
IQR
|
Interquartile Range
|
|
MODS
|
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
|
|
GCS
|
Glasgow Coma Scale
|
|
ARDS
|
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
|
|
AKI
|
Acute Kidney Injury
|
|
PRISM III
|
Pediatric Risk of Mortality III
|
|
CI
|
Confidence interval
|