A
The relationship between self-care ability and depression in elderly rural patients with coronary heart disease: A latent profile analysis
Abstract
Objective
This study investigated the latent profile characteristics of self-care ability in elderly rural patients with coronary heart disease and analysed its relationship with depression.
Methods
Data were collected from the Elderly Health Assessment Project at Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Shandong First Medical University. The Harman single-factor method was employed to test for common method bias. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to identify distinct subtypes of self-care ability. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to explore the relationships between self-care ability and sociodemographic variables in elderly rural patients with coronary heart disease. ANOVA was used to explore the associations between self-care ability patterns and depression across different self-care ability groups.
Results
A total of 999 elderly rural patients with coronary heart disease could be divided into three categories of self-care ability: low self-care ability—struggling to start group (21.9%), moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group (32.4%), and high self-care ability—stable mastery group (45.7%). The factors influencing self-care ability profiles included age, monthly income, smoking status, vision loss status, types of medications, duration of disease, and self-rated health. This study also revealed a significant association between self-care ability and depression, with the high self-care ability group having the lowest depression scores (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
A
The findings highlight the heterogeneity in self-care ability in elderly rural patients with coronary heart disease and emphasize the importance of tailored interventions to address individual needs. Healthcare providers should focus on improving self-care ability and managing depression to enhance the quality of life and health outcomes in this population.
Keywords:
Self-care ability
Depression
Coronary heart disease
Rural elderly
Nursing care
A
A
1. Introduction
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a global public health issue1,2 and remains one of the leading causes of death and disability among elderly individuals worldwide3. In China, the prevalence of CHD continues to rise due to the ageing population, with the prevalence of CHD in individuals over 60 years old reaching 27.8%; since 2012, mortality rates have been gradually increasing, particularly in rural areas4. Owing to limited medical resources, low health literacy, and economic constraints, disease management for elderly rural CHD patients faces numerous challenges5. Self-care ability, as a key factor in managing one’s health, plays a critical role in mitigating the physical, psychological, and social impacts of disease and treatment; improving disease outcomes; and enhancing quality of life6.
Self-care refers to the decision-making process involved in maintaining individual health through health promotion practices and disease management7. It plays a crucial role in improving patients’ well-being, reducing morbidity and mortality, and lowering health care costs8. For elderly rural CHD patients, self-care ability encompasses the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for disease management, including medication management, symptom monitoring, dietary control, and appropriate physical activity9. Previous studies have shown that self-care ability in CHD patients is generally moderate-to-low and closely associated with factors such as age, comorbidities, and depressive symptoms9,10. Therefore, investigating the individual differences in self-care ability among elderly rural CHD patients and developing targeted interventions are of paramount importance.
Depression is a negative emotional response to chronic stressors, typically manifested by persistent low mood, loss of interest, lack of energy, fatigue, insomnia or hypersomnia, changes in appetite, and poor concentration11. Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of depression among CHD patients can reach as high as 40%12. Depression often leads to neglect or avoidance of self-care tasks, such as a lack of motivation to engage in necessary exercise or take medications on time, which weakens self-management behaviours and negatively impacts self-care ability9,13. Additionally, the incidence of depression is greater among elderly rural populations14, who face challenges such as limited medical resources, low health literacy, and poor economic conditions. Therefore, the interrelationship between self-care ability and depression in elderly rural CHD patients requires further investigation.
Latent profile analysis (LPA), an individual-centred statistical method, categorizes individuals into latent classes on the basis of their performance across multiple indicators, thus revealing the heterogeneity within a population15. Traditional research methods tend to be variable-centred, focus on the overall impact of factors on self-care ability, and often overlook individual-level heterogeneity. In contrast, individual-centred approaches emphasize the relationships between individuals and outcome variables16. In health care, LPA has been widely used to identify distinct patient subtypes, enabling the identification of high-risk profiles that require targeted prevention strategies, thus providing a reliable basis for intervention development17. To date, no research has applied LPA to investigate the self-care ability of elderly rural CHD patients. Therefore, this study aimed to employ LPA to explore the latent profile characteristics of self-care ability in elderly rural CHD patients and analyse the influencing factors of each latent class. The findings are expected to provide scientific evidence for developing tiered, personalized interventions to improve self-care ability and health outcomes in this population.
1.1 Theoretical framework
This study is based on Orem’s self-care theory18, which emphasizes the self-care activities individuals engage in to maintain health. The core concept of the theory is the alignment between an individual’s self-care needs and self-care abilities to sustain health and well-being. When an individual’s self-care abilities are insufficient to meet health needs, they may experience a deficiency in self-care, requiring external support or assistance19. This theory is intrinsically linked to this study in two main ways: first, elderly rural patients with CHD have various self-care needs in managing their condition, such as dietary control, exercise management, and medication adherence, all of which rely on the patients’ self-care abilities20; second, elderly rural populations may have generally weak self-care abilities due to factors such as limited health knowledge, inadequate social support, and financial constraints, leading to self-care deficiencies21. Therefore, LPA can be used to identify distinct groups of self-care abilities, enabling the development of targeted interventions for each group to improve health management outcomes.
The relationship between self-care ability and depression is particularly prominent22. When elderly patients are unable to effectively manage their health, they may feel helpless, frustrated, and anxious, which can lead to the onset of depressive symptoms23. Psychological factors are a crucial component of Orem’s self-care theory, and this framework provides a unique psychological perspective to understand whether different levels of self-care ability are linked to the occurrence of depression22. Thus, guided by Orem’s self-care theory, this study conducted LPA of self-care ability in elderly rural patients with CHD, explored the characteristics and influencing factors of different groups, compared depressive symptoms among different groups, and revealed the relationship between self-care ability and depression.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Data and sample
This study utilized data from the Elderly Health Assessment Project of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Shandong First Medical University. From April to June 2024, investigators conducted face-to-face questionnaire surveys and medical health examinations among elderly rural residents in 33 villages in Xintai city, Shandong Province, China. This study aimed to assess the health status of elderly rural individuals comprehensively by examining various social, behavioural, environmental, and biological factors influencing their well-being. The analysis was based on the most recent 2024 baseline survey, comprising 5,389 responses.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age ≥ 60 years; (2) clinically diagnosed coronary heart disease; (3) permanent residency in the survey area for over one year; (4) participation in
medical health examinations with available health reports; (5) ability to communicate normally and cooperate in completing the survey; and (6) provision of informed consent with voluntary participation. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) any form of dementia; (2) severe mental disorders; (3) inability to cooperate or refusal to participate; and (4) duplicate participation. After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 999 valid samples were retained for analysis. The screening procedure is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the sample selection process.
Click here to Correct
2.2 Measures
2.2.1 General information questionnaire
The general information questionnaire included the following variables: (1) Sociodemographic characteristics, including sex, age, marital status, number of children, residential conditions, education level, and monthly income. (2) Physical health-related conditions, including smoking, alcohol consumption, hearing, vision, types of medications, number of years of illness, duration of disease, number of other chronic diseases and self-rated health.
2.2.2 Self-care ability
The Self-Care Ability Scale for the Elderly (SASE) was developed by Swedish scholar Süderhamn in 199624. This scale comprises three dimensions, i.e., skills, goals, and environment, with a total of 17 items. It employs a 5-point Likert scale, where each item is scored from 1 to 5 points, and four items are reverse-scored. Higher scores indicate better self-care ability among older adults. The SASE specifically addresses the characteristics of older adults and reflects issues pertinent to geriatrics. Owing to its concise structure, it is suitable for evaluating the current status of self-care ability in Chinese older adults. Chinese scholars Guo et al confirmed its good reliability and validity in the elderly population, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.8225. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this scale was 0.764.
2.2.3 Depression
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a depression screening scale developed by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and is based on the diagnostic criteria for depression in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)26. The PHQ-9 scale consists of nine items, including depressed mood, diminished interest, sleep disturbances, fatigue, appetite changes, self-blame, inattention, slow or irritable action, and suicidal ideation. Each item corresponds to one of the core symptoms of depression in the DSM-IV, and the patient is asked to rate each item on a scale of 0 to 3 on the basis of his or her actual situation over the past two weeks. The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. Several studies have shown that the PHQ-9 is highly sensitive and specific for screening for depression in adults over the age of 60, making it an effective tool for screening for depression in older adults27,28. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for this scale in this study was 0.842.
2.3 Statistical analysis
In this study, SPSS 27.0 was employed to establish a database, and SPSS 27.0 and Mplus 8.3 were used for data analysis. A bilateral test with P < 0.05 indicated that the results were statistically significant.
2.3.1 Common method deviation test
The self-report method was adopted for data collection in this study, which involved a large number of questionnaires, which may have led to differences in the measurement results during the measurement process. To verify the existence of such common method bias, the Harman single factor method was used for data testing25. All items of the scale were subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) without rotation. If two or more common factors can be extracted from the analysis results and the variance explanation rate of the first common factor is less than or equal to 40%, it indicates that the common method bias is not significant; that is, the variable is less affected by the common method bias.
2.3.2 Descriptive analysis
In the descriptive analysis of the general data and the scores of each scale, the measurement data conforming to a normal distribution are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD), whereas those not conforming to a normal distribution are presented as the median (quartile) [M(IQR)]. Count data are presented as frequencies and percentages.
2.3.3 Latent profile analysis
Potential profiles were analysed using the 17-item scores of self-care ability among older rural adults with CHD as exogenous variables. The initial assumption was that only one profile existed; then, the number of profiles was gradually increased and various model parameters were analysed to select the best model by comparing the fitting indicators. There were three types of fit metrics used in the potential profile analysis29: (1) The model fit test metrics were the Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and adjusted Bayesian information criterion (aBIC), with smaller values indicating better model fit. (2) The classification index was the entropy value, which ranges from 0 ~ 1; a value closer to 1 indicates higher accuracy. (3) Likelihood ratio test indicators included the Lo–Mendell–Rubin corrected likelihood ratio (LMR) and bootstrap likelihood ratio test (BLRT); when p < 0.05, the k-1st profile model is superior to the k-1st profile model. In this study, the best classification model was determined on the basis of the above fitting indicators combined with the comprehensive judgement of clinical practice.
2.3.4 Single factor and multifactor analysis
In SPSS 27.0, the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact probability method and the Kruskal‒Wallis H test were employed to analyse subgroup population characteristics and intergroup comparisons. The variables with statistical significance in univariate analysis were included in multiple logistic regression analysis to explore the influencing factors of self-care ability among older rural adults with coronary heart disease. Additionally, we used multivariate ANOVA to explore the differences in depression across different levels of self-care ability, with p < 0.05 indicating a statistically significant difference.
2.4 Ethics approval
The program was approved by the Ethics Committee. All participants signed an informed consent form at the time of their participation. The study follows the Declaration of Helsinki.
3. Results
3.1 Common method deviation test
The Harman single-factor method was employed to test for common method bias. The results revealed that there were 5 factors with feature roots > 1, and the variance of the variance interpretation of the first factor was 24.205%, which was < 40% of the recommended standard, indicating that there was no serious common methodological bias in this study.
3.2 Demographic information
The results revealed that the participants were between 60 and 92 years old, with a mean age of 72.37 ± 6.47 years. Among the participants, 50.2% were older adults between 71 and 80 years of age, 70.5% were female, 69.8% were married, and 82.8% had an education level of elementary school or below. Individuals with more than 3 children accounted for 50.1%, 72.3% did not live alone, and 79.6% had an income of < 1000 yuan/month. The average self-rated health status was 34.8%, 73.8% had coronary heart disease for more than 3 years, 52.8% had hearing loss, and 69.3% had 3 or more chronic diseases. Other characteristics are detailed in Table 1.
3.3 Results of latent profile analysis
Self-care ability was used as an exogenous indicator, and 1 to 4 latent profile models were selected for exploratory latent profile analysis of self-care ability in elderly rural patients with coronary heart disease. The results are shown in Table 2. The number of model categories increased from 1 to 4, and the AIC, BIC, and aBIC continued to decrease, with entropy being the highest among the 4-profile models. The 2-profile model LMRT had P values > 0.05 and was excluded. In the 4-profile model, the number of some subgroups accounted for only a small proportion of the total number of people, and the clinical interpretability was poor. Moreover, LMRT had P values > 0.05 in the 4-profile model, so it was excluded. The 3-profile models AIC, BIC, and aBIC were small, the entropy was > 0.8, and the LMRT and BLRT were significant. Therefore, the 3-profile model was finally chosen as the optimal potential profile model for this study. Table 4 shows the attribution probability matrix for the 3 potential profiles. The average probability of attribution of each class to its corresponding potential profile ranged from 93.3% to 99.9% (all > 90%), indicating that the results of the model for the three potential profiles in this study were plausible.
3.4 Naming the latent profile
A graph was drawn using the distribution of scores on the 17 entries of the self-care ability scale for the three categories of elderly rural patients with CHD, with the horizontal coordinate being the number of entries on the self-care ability scale and the vertical coordinate being the score (Fig. 1). The three latent categories were named according to the latent profile results and the score characteristics of Fig. 1. Category 1 is named “low self-care ability—struggling to start group” because this category initially has low scores with relatively large fluctuations in the later stages, and overall, the scores remain relatively low. Category 2 is named the “moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group,” as this category shows moderate scores with relatively steady growth in both the early and later stages. Category 3 is named the “high self-care ability—stable mastery group,” as it has overall high and stable scores.
3.5 Univariate analysis of self-care ability profiles
The chi-square test and Kruskal‒Wallis H test were employed to compare the differences in the existence of single risk factors among elderly rural patients with CHD with different potential self-care ability categories, and the results are shown in Table 1. The three potential categories of self-care ability of elderly rural patients with CHD were compared in terms of age, monthly income, smoking status, vision loss status, types of medications, duration of disease, self-rated health and depression, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05), as shown in Table 1.
3.6 Multinomial logistic regression of self-care ability profiles
The variables that showed statistical significance in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model, with the three latent categories as the dependent variables. (variable assignments are shown in Table 4). The low self-care ability—struggling to start group and the moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group were employed as the reference group to compare the groups.
The regression analysis results revealed that age, monthly income, smoking status, vision loss status, types of medications, duration of disease, self-rated health and depression affected the latent categories of self-care ability in the participants (all p < 0.05). The results are shown in Table 5. Specifically, monthly income and vision loss status predicted the pattern of the moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group in the comparison between the low self-care ability—struggling to start group and the moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group. Age, monthly income, vision loss status, duration of disease, self-rated health and depression predicted the pattern of the high self-care ability—stable mastery group in the comparison between the low self-care ability—struggling to start group and the high self-care ability—stable mastery group; smoking status, types of medications and depression predicted the pattern of the high self-care ability—stable mastery group in the comparison between the moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group and the high self-care ability—stable mastery group.
3.7 Relationships between self-care ability and depression in elderly rural patients with CHD
One-way ANOVA was used to explore the relationships between modes of self-care ability and depression in elderly rural patients with CHD. The results in Table 6 show that the differences between the different modes of self-care ability among older rural adults were significant (p < 0.001) for depression. Further post hoc test results revealed that for depression, the moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group scored the highest, and the high self-care ability—stable mastery group scored the lowest.
Table 1
General characteristics of self-care ability in elderly rural patients with CHD.
Characteristics
N (%)
Low self-care ability—struggling to start group
Moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group
High self-care ability—stable mastery group
X2/H
P
Sex
       
X2 = 0.598
0.742
Male
295(29.5%)
69
97
129
   
Female
704(70.5%)
150
232
322
   
Age
       
X2 = 10.777
0.029
60–70
385(38.5%)
75
112
198
   
71–80
501(50.2%)
114
179
208
   
≥ 81
113(11.3%)
30
38
45
   
Marital status
       
X2 = 6.237
0.277
Married
697(69.8%)
159
216
322
   
Divorced
6(0.6%)
1
3
2
   
Widowed spouse
294(29.4%)
58
109
127
   
unmarried
2(0.2%)
1
1
0
   
Number of children
       
X2 = 6.383
0.341
none
1(0.1%)
0
1
0
   
1
69(6.9%)
16
16
37
   
2
429(42.9%)
95
137
197
   
≥ 3
500(50.1%)
108
175
217
   
Residential conditions
       
X2 = 2.694
0.610
live alone
277(27.7%)
58
101
118
   
with children
41(4.1%)
11
12
18
   
with spouse
681(68.2%)
150
216
315
   
Educational level
       
X2 = 9.531
0.299
illiteracy
587(58.8%)
129
201
257
   
primary school
240(24.0%)
57
80
103
   
junior high school
120(12.0%)
24
32
64
   
high school/technical secondary school
45(4.5%)
9
15
21
   
college/university
7(0.7%)
0
1
6
   
Monthly income
       
X2 = 36.120
<0.001
<1000
795(79.6%)
159
286
350
   
1000–1999
76(7.6%)
34
11
31
   
2000–3499
47(4.7%)
10
13
24
   
3500–4999
37(3.7%)
5
9
22
   
≥ 5000
44(4.4%)
10
10
24
   
Smoking status
       
X2 = 12.864
0.012
smoking all the time
82(8.2%)
16
38
28
   
quit smoking
143(14.3%)
24
41
78
   
never smoking
774(77.5%)
179
250
345
   
Alcohol consumption
       
X2 = 5.962
0.428
drinking regularly
71(7.1%)
11
25
35
   
drink alcohol occasionally
110(11.0%)
31
29
50
   
quit drinking
116(11.6%)
22
39
55
   
never drink alcohol
702(70.3%)
155
236
311
   
Hearing loss
       
X2 = 1.147
0.564
yes
527(52.8%)
116
166
245
   
no
472(48.2%)
103
163
206
   
Vision loss
       
X2 = 6.558
0.038
yes
418(41.8%)
106
123
189
   
no
581(59.2%)
113
206
262
   
Types of medication
       
X2 = 18.899
0.042
none
143(14.3%)
28
43
72
   
1
199(19.9%)
42
59
98
   
2
219(21.9%)
57
55
107
   
3
164(16.4%)
31
67
66
   
4
104(10.4%)
23
42
39
   
≥ 5
170(17.0%)
38
63
69
   
Duration of disease
       
X2 = 19.445
0.013
0–3
262(26.2%)
54
83
125
   
4–7
265(26.5%)
59
77
129
   
8–11
218(21.8%)
59
75
82
   
12–15
98(9.8%)
11
32
55
   
≥ 16
156(15.6%)
36
61
59
   
Number of other chronic diseases
       
X2 = 2.902
0.821
none
22(2.2%)
6
7
9
   
1–3
492(49.3%)
108
156
228
   
4–6
400(40.0%)
82
139
179
   
>6
85(8.5%)
23
27
35
   
Self-rated health
       
X2 = 35.201
<0.001
very poor
19(1.9%)
2
8
9
   
poor
104(10.4%)
13
42
49
   
fair
348(34.8%)
106
113
129
   
good
376(37.6%)
68
129
179
   
very good
152(15.2%)
30
37
85
   
Table 2
Indicators for each latent profile of self-care ability in elderly rural patients with CHD.
Profile
Likelihood
AIC
BIC
aBIC
Entropy
LMRT (P)
BLRT (P)
Proportion
1
-22707.259
45482.519
45649.349
45541.363
-
-
-
-
2
-21511.898
43127.796
43382.947
43217.792
0.997
0.5658
0. 0000
0.219/0.781
3
-20977.862
42095.724
42439.197
42216.873
0.894
0.0118
0. 0000
0.219/0.329/0.452
4
-19775.875
39727.750
40159.545
39880.052
1.000
0.8414
0. 0000
0.005/0.769/0.200/0.026
A
Fig. 2
Latent profile model of self-care ability in elderly rural patients with CHD.
Click here to Correct
A
Table 3
Attribution probabilities for each latent profile of the subjects.
Class
Low self-care ability—struggling to start group
Moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group
High self-care ability—stable mastery group
Low self-care ability—struggling to start group
0.999
0.000
0.000
Moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group
0.000
0.933
0.067
High self-care ability—stable mastery group
0.001
0.058
0.941
Table 4
Case of variable assignment.
Variable
Assignment mode
Age
60–70 = 1;71–80 = 2༛≥81 = 3
Monthly income
<1000=1;1000–1999༝2༛2000–3499༝3༛3500–4999༝4༛≥5000༝5
Smoking status
Smoking all the time = 1; Quit smoking = 2; Never smoking = 3
Vision loss
Yes = 1;No = 2
Types of medications
None=1, 2༝2;3༝3༛4༝4༛≥5༝5
Self-rated health
Very poor=1; Poor༝2; Fair༝3; Good༝4;Very good༝5
Depression
Measured value
Table 5
Multinomial logistic regression of self-care ability profiles
Reference group
Low self-care ability—struggling to start group
Moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group
Comparison group
Moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group
High self-care ability—stable mastery group
High self-care ability—stable mastery group
OR
95% CI
P
OR
95% CI
P
OR
95% CI
P
Age
                 
60–70
1.625
0.885–2.982
0.117
1.940
1.089–3.457
0.024
1.194
0.710–2.009
0.504
71–80
1.396
0.795–2.451
0.246
1.196
0.694–2.062
0.520
0.857
0.521–1.410
0.543
Monthly income
                 
<1000
1.679
0.659–4.278
0.278
0.865
0.387–1.937
0.725
0.515
0.236–1.128
0.097
1000–1999
0.261
0.082–0.833
0.023
0.272
0.105-0.700
0.007
1.039
0.366–2.952
0.942
2000–3499
0.954
0.272–3.344
0.941
0.851
0.283–2.561
0.774
0.892
0.316–2.520
0.829
3500–4999
1.248
0.309–5.031
0.756
1.476
0.439–4.957
0.529
1.183
0.392–3.567
0.776
Smoking status
                 
smoking all the time
1.682
0.882–3.206
0.114
0.683
0.349–1.336
0.266
0.406
0.236–0.699
0.001
Vision loss
                 
yes
0.589
0.404–0.859
0.006
0.600
0.420–0.857
0.005
1.018
0.743–1.394
0.913
Types of medication
                 
none
0.953
0.489–1.857
0.889
1.532
0.810–2.896
0.190
1.606
0.933–2.766
0.087
1
0.870
0.476–1.591
0.651
1.448
0.810–2.589
0.212
1.664
1.007–2.750
0.047
2
0.610
0.339–1.099
0.100
1.076
0.615–1.881
0.789
1.763
1.066–2.915
0.027
3
1.463
0.786–2.724
0.229
1.446
0.787–2.731
0.228
1.002
0.604–1.663
0.994
4
1.308
0.657–2.603
0.444
1.211
0.605–2.421
0.589
0.925
0.518–1.652
0.793
Duration of disease
                 
0–3
1.035
0.584–1.833
0.906
1.385
0.794–2.418
0.251
1.339
0.831–2.155
0.230
4–7
0.831
0.473–1.458
0.518
1.318
0.764–2.272
0.321
1.586
0.983–2.558
0.059
8–11
0.772
0.441–1.352
0.366
0.896
0.513–1.564
0.669
1.160
0.708-1.900
0.557
12–15
2.045
0.882–4.473
0.096
3.679
1.639–8.258
0.002
1.799
0.996–3.249
0.052
Self-rated health
                 
very poor
1.618
0.295–8.860
0.579
1.743
0.323–9.416
0.519
1.077
0.350–3.315
0.897
poor
1.452
0.610–3.453
0.399
1.308
0.575–2.977
0.522
0.901
0.475–1.709
0.750
fair
0.621
0.343–1.122
0.115
0.383
0.225–0.650
<0.001
0.617
0.376–1.010
0.055
very good
1.299
0.772–2.337
0.383
0.892
0.529–1.505
0.669
0.687
0.432–1.094
0.114
Table 6
Comparison of depression scores in elderly rural patients with CHD on the basis of self-care ability profiles
 
Low self-care ability—struggling to start group
Moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group
High self-care ability—stable mastery group
t
P
LSD
Sample sizes
219
329
451
     
Depression scores
12.61 ± 5.21
13.26 ± 4.46
11.99 ± 3.92
25.448
<0.001
1,2 < 3
4. Discussion
4.1 Potential profile characteristics of self-care ability in elderly rural patients with CHD
This study identified three distinct subtypes of self-care ability on the basis of the scores of 17 self-care ability items in elderly rural patients with CHD: “low self-care ability—struggling to start group”, “moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group”, and “high self-care ability—stable mastery group.” These findings indicate significant variability in self-care ability levels among elderly rural patients with CHD. The characteristics of these three types are as follows: “low self-care ability—struggling to start group”: this group had the lowest overall self-care ability score, accounting for 21.9% of the sample; “moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group”: this group had moderate overall self-care ability scores, representing 32.4% of the sample; “high self-care ability—stable mastery group”: this group had the highest overall self-care ability score, accounting for the largest proportion at 45.7%. The low self-care ability—struggling to start group represented the smallest proportion of patients, which could be attributed to recent improvements in rural health care services. Although medical resources in rural areas remain limited, increased national focus on primary health care and the development of health education programs over the past few years have contributed to better self-care ability among elderly patients, allowing them to progress into moderate or high self-care ability groups30,31.
Furthermore, in the comparison of overall scores across the three groups, the scores for Items 1 and 12 were lower across all groups. This may be due to the physical limitations of elderly rural patients with coronary heart disease, particularly the decline in cardiovascular function, which reduces their physical activity capacity32. As a result, behaviours such as walking to distant locations (Item 1) or seeking solitude (Item 12) may become more difficult or impractical for all groups. However, a between-group comparison revealed that the low self-care ability—struggling to start group scored higher on Items 1 and 12 than did the other two groups. This could be because, despite their lower self-care ability, these patients might still recognize the benefits of walking as a gentle form of exercise and may show a greater willingness to engage in outdoor activities33. Additionally, compared with the other groups, this group may feel more helpless in addressing their health issues, leading to more emotional responses and psychological stress. These challenges might make them more likely to seek solitude as a coping mechanism for emotional regulation.
4.2 Factors influencing potential profiles of self-care ability in elderly rural patients with CHD
Elderly rural patients with CHD with low monthly income, vision loss, and average self-rated health had a greater probability of belonging to the low self-care ability—struggling to start group. First, the low self-care ability of elderly rural patients with CHD with low economic levels was similar to the findings of Azam et al34. The probable reason for this is that low income limits the ability of patients to seek regular medical care and timely medication and checkups, resulting in the inability of patients to receive timely treatment or purchase necessary medications, which affects the health management of the disease35. Second, the main reason why vision loss leads to reduced self-care ability is that vision loss directly limits patients' ability to perform daily activities, such as basic self-care activities (e.g., eating, dressing, personal hygiene, etc.) and complex tasks (e.g., reading, writing, etc.), and this functional limitation not only increases patients' reliance on the help of others but also directly reduces their level of self-care36. Finally, patients with average health status are usually physically limited and lack sufficient energy and motivation for effective self-care, such as taking medication on time, eating a healthy diet, and exercising on a regular basis, which also reflects their pessimistic attitudes towards their own health as well as disease-related psychological stress, thus affecting self-care behaviours37,38. Therefore, relevant government departments should increase medical subsidies and financial support, provide assistive devices and design barrier-free living environments to improve medical services and living environments for elderly rural patients with CHD. In addition, healthcare providers should develop targeted self-care programs for patients with different health conditions and provide psychological support and emotional care to help patients overcome physiological and psychological barriers, establish a positive psychological state, and gradually improve their self-care ability.
Elderly rural patients with CHD who were chronic smokers had a greater probability of belonging to the moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group, which is consistent with the findings of Putri et al39. Chronic smoking severely affects patients' cardiovascular and respiratory systems, increases the probability of other chronic diseases, and causes psychological problems such as anxiety and depression, which increase the challenges of mental health management and limit their participation in self-care and disease management40,41. Therefore, healthcare providers should strengthen education and training on the harmful effects of smoking and actively provide smoking cessation interventions through smoking cessation clinics and alternative therapies to help patients quit smoking and reduce the negative effects of smoking on the body. In addition, family members and society should provide a more comprehensive support system for older adults who quit smoking, such as emotional care, social activities, and convenient health management services, to improve their adverse psychological state.
Elderly rural patients with CHD who are younger, take fewer types of medications, and have a longer duration of disease have a greater probability of belonging to the high self-care ability-stable mastery group. First, compared with elderly rural patients with coronary artery disease aged 70 years or older, elderly rural patients with CHD aged 60–70 years usually have better overall health and may not have significant other chronic diseases or relatively mild health problems; however, as they grow older, their physical functions continue to decline, their health problems gradually become more pronounced, and their ability to take care of themselves gradually declines42. Second, taking fewer types of medications usually means that their condition is more stable, the symptoms are milder or the patient is able to control the condition through health management (e.g., dietary adjustments, regular exercise, etc.), thus avoiding overreliance on medications, which requires a greater level of self-care ability43.
Finally, elderly rural patients with CHD who had a long duration of disease had a greater probability of belonging to the high self-care ability—stable mastery group. This may be because they have accumulated richer self-management experience in the course of long-term disease management, gradually learned to adjust their lifestyles according to their own conditions, and are able to detect changes in their conditions and take corresponding measures in a timely manner; thus, their self-care ability has improved. Therefore, early health education on chronic disease management should be provided to elderly individuals in rural areas to help them understand the importance of early screening and disease management. Drug management programs should be developed for patients taking multiple medications on an individual basis to improve their health and reduce unnecessary drug use by improving their poor lifestyles. In addition, for patients with longer disease durations and greater self-care ability, professional guidance on the injection of medications should be provided to address the weak points of their disease management to further strengthen their self-care ability.
4.3 Differences in depression levels among elderly rural patients with CHD in different categories of self-care ability
This study also examined the level of depression in elderly rural individuals with CHD with different levels of self-care ability and revealed a significant association between different self-care abilities and depression. Higher self-care ability was associated with lower depression, which is consistent with previous findings44. In other words, the poorer an individual's self-care ability is, the more likely their depressive symptoms are to be severe. Conversely, as self-care ability increases, patients’ self-confidence and self-efficacy increase, which may help alleviate their level of depression. The results of this study showed that the high self-care ability to stabilize mastery group had the lowest depression scores, and the other two groups were not comparable in the comparison of range values. The differences in depression scores among the three categories of patients were statistically significant (all P < 0.05), suggesting that there is a close relationship between the occurrence of depression in elderly rural patients with CHD and their self-care ability. Usually, depressive symptoms affect patients' cognitive and executive functions, and compared with severely depressed patients, patients with milder depressive symptoms are better able to plan and perform daily care tasks; however, their self-efficacy is greater, and they are more willing to actively seek support and resources13. These findings suggest that healthcare providers should pay attention to the negative impact of depression on patients, actively improve patients' depression through psychological intervention and social support, and enhance self-efficacy in disease management, thus strengthening self-care behaviours.
5. Limitations
This study has the following two main limitations: (1) The survey covered only 33 natural villages in Xintai city, Shandong Province, China, which makes the sample somewhat less representative due to the diversity and complexity of rural areas, which affects the generalizability of the study. Therefore, future studies need to expand the sample to cover additional types of rural areas to improve the representativeness and generalizability of the study. (2) In examining the factors influencing the self-care ability of elderly rural patients with CHD, this study was only a cross-sectional survey that examined relatively few influencing factors, and future studies need to consider other factors that may influence elderly rural patients with CHD and depression to conduct an in-depth longitudinal study.
6. Conclusions
There was heterogeneity in the self-care ability of elderly rural patients with CHD, which could be divided into three categories: low self-care ability—struggling to start group, moderate self-care ability—gradual adaptation group, and high self-care ability—stable mastery group. There were differences in age, monthly income, smoking status, vision loss status, types of medications, duration of disease, self-rated health and depression among different categories of elderly rural patients with CHD. These findings not only enrich our theoretical knowledge about the self-care ability of older rural adults but also provide important references for future policy development, practice interventions, and future research directions. Therefore, healthcare providers should focus on understanding the individual characteristics of elderly rural patients with CHD and pay attention to the characteristics of patients with poorer self-care ability.
Abbreviations
CHD Coronary heart disease
LPA Latent profile analysis
A
Author Contribution
Teng Yang: Writing, data sorting, data analysis; Wen Li, Jia Song: data sorting, data analysis; Xiaoyu Gou, Luyao Yan, Mengjie Li, Nan Lu: data analysis; Minmin Leng: Framework planning; Zixu Yu, Zhenmei Zhang: review, editing
References
1.
McGarrol S. Contextualising lifestyles: how socially contrasting places in Fife, Scotland influence lay understandings of lifestyle and health behaviours in relation to coronary heart disease. Health Place. 2020;66:102432.
2.
Abreu D, Sousa P, Matias-Dias C, Pinto F. Impact of public health initiatives on acute coronary syndrome fatality rates in Portugal. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition). 2020;39(1):27–34.
3.
Zhu J, Changzai L, Chen F, et al. Mediation effect of illness acceptance between perceived social support and self-management behaviors in rural elderly with coronary heart disease. Geriatr Nurs. 2024;60:114–20.
4.
In China T, Hu SS. Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2021: an updated summary. J Geriatr Cardiol Jun. 2023;28(6):399–430.
5.
Li Q, Cai L, Cui W, Wang G, He J, Golden A. Economic burden of obesity and four obesity-related chronic diseases in rural Yunnan Province, China. Public Health. 2018;164:91–8.
6.
Liu D, Gao Y, Su X. Self-care ability and associated factors in community-dwelling older adults living with oral frailty using the COM-B model. J Oral Rehabil Aug. 2024;51(8):1530–41.
7.
Marcomini I, Iovino P, Rasero L, Manara DF, Vellone E, Villa G. Self-Care and Quality of Life of Ostomy Patients: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Nurs Rep. 2024;14(4):3417–26.
8.
Riegel B, Dunbar SB, Fitzsimons D, et al. Self-care research: where are we now? Where are we going? Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;116:103402.
9.
Ingadóttir B, Svavarsdóttir MH, Jurgens CY, Lee CS. Self-care trajectories of patients with coronary heart disease: a longitudinal, observational study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024;23(7):780–8.
10.
Di Matteo R, Bolgeo T, Dal Molin A, et al. Self-care behaviours and their determinants in people affected by coronary heart disease. J Clin Nurs Jun. 2024;4. 10.1111/jocn.17299.
11.
Abdoli N, Salari N, Darvishi N, et al. The global prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) among the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2022;132:1067–73.
12.
Ren MY. A current study of depression and its nursing intervention in patients with coronary artery disease [J]. Int Nurs Med. 2024;6(4):13.
13.
Gao YL, Shen LX, Hou XM, Si SP, Zhu HH, Shi ZL. The factors influencing self-management in patients with depression: a qualitative research from China. BMC Psychiatry Jan. 2025;17(1):48.
14.
Gao Q, Lei C, Wei X, et al. Exploring the interplay of living arrangements, social support, and depression among older adults in rural northwest China. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):3297.
15.
Hou B, Zhang H. Latent profile analysis of depression among older adults living alone in China. J Affect Disord Mar. 2023;15:325:378–85.
16.
Kong L, Zhang H. Latent profile analysis of depression in non-hospitalized elderly patients with hypertension and its influencing factors. J Affect Disord Nov. 2023;15:341:67–76.
17.
Wang K, Diao M, Yang Z, Liu M, Salvador JT. Identification of subgroups of patients with gastrointestinal cancers based on symptom severity and frequency: A latent profile and latent class analysis. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024;68:102479.
18.
Orem DE, Taylor SG, Renpenning KM. Nursing: Concepts of practice. 1995.
19.
El-Osta A, Webber D, Gnani S et al. The self-care matrix: a unifying framework for self-Care.-Selfcare Journal. SelfCare J. 2019.
20.
Jamil Alkuwaisi M, Alsaqri SH, Al-Rashidi AM, Ali Alshowkan A, Mostoles RP Jr., Ong Cornejo T. Effectiveness of the Individualized Self-Care Program Based on Orem's Self-Care Theory: Impact on Learning Needs and Self-Care Behaviors Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery - A Randomized Controlled Trial. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) Dec. 2024;18(5):516–24.
21.
Guo Y, Wang T, Ge T, Jiang Q. Prevalence of self-care disability among older adults in China. BMC Geriatr Oct. 2022;1(1):775.
22.
Tang XY, Wei YX, Kong LN, Lu F. Relationship between social support and self-care ability among patients with breast cancer during rehabilitation: The multiple mediating roles of resilience and depression. J Clin Nurs Jan. 2025;34(1):161–70.
23.
Devita M, De Salvo R, Ravelli A et al. Recognizing depression in the elderly: practical guidance and challenges for clinical management. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022:2867–80.
24.
Süderhamn O, Ek A-C, Pürn I. The self-care ability scale for the elderly. Scand J Occup Ther. 1996;3(2):69–78.
25.
Guo LN, Liu K, Guo QY, Gao H, et al. A study on the reliability of the Chinese version of the Self-Care Ability Scale for the Elderly [J]. Chin J Nurs. 2015;50(08):1009–13.
26.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.
27.
Aslan J, Cova F, Saldivia S, et al. Psychometric Properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Elderly Chilean Primary Care Users. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:555011.
28.
Zhang H, Wang S, Wang L, Yi X, Jia X, Jia C. Comparison of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening depression in older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int Feb. 2020;20(2):138–43.
29.
Wang Y, Wang X, Li X, Wen S, Xu L, Ni Y. Exploring patterns of social participation and its relationship with loneliness among older adults in rural China through a person-centered approach: A cross-sectional study using latent profile analysis. Geriatr Nurs. 2025;62:19–29.
30.
Sun YQ, Jiang AL, Chen SM, Li H, Xing HY, Wang F. Quality of life and self-care in elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases: The effect of a Traditional Chinese Medicine health educational intervention. Appl Nurs Res Dec. 2017;38:134–40. 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.10.003.
31.
Ownby RL, Simonson M, Caballero J, et al. A mobile app for chronic disease self-management for individuals with low health literacy: A multisite randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. J ageing Longev. 2024;4(2):51–71.
32.
Cacciatore S, Spadafora L, Bernardi M et al. Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Older Adults: Recent Advances and Gaps in Evidence. J Clin Med Aug 11 2023;12(16).
33.
Kasargod Prabhakar CR, Stewart R. Physical activity and mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease. Curr Opin Cardiol Nov. 2018;33(6):653–9.
34.
Azam UAA, Hashim SM, Hamzah Z, Ahmad N. The role of social role strain, psychological resources and perceiving diabetes as a priority with self-care in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Womens Health Feb. 2025;21(1):80.
35.
Li C, Young BR, Jian W. Association of socioeconomic status with financial burden of disease among elderly patients with cardiovascular disease: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey. BMJ Open Mar. 2018;22(3):e018703.
36.
Cai C, Shuai Y, Li G. The effect of low vision rehabilitation on the quality of life and caregiver burden of low vision patients - a randomized trial. BMC Ophthalmol Jan. 2025;15(1):20.
37.
Hauenstein EJ, Davey A, Clark RS, Daly S, You W, Merwin EI. Self-Care Capacity and Its Relationship to Age, Disability, and Perceived Well-Being in Medicare Beneficiaries. Nurs Res Jan-Feb. 2022;01(1):21–32.
38.
Shimode Y, Kitai T, Iwata K, et al. Impact of stress coping style on self-care behaviors and prognosis in patients with heart failure: A prospective longitudinal observational study. Int J Cardiol Feb. 2025;15:421:132865.
39.
Putri SE, Rekawati E, Wati DNK. Effectiveness of self-management on adherence to self-care and on health status among elderly people with hypertension. J Public Health Res May 31 2021;10(s1).
40.
Feng H, Li Z, Zheng R. The global burden of chronic respiratory diseases attributable to tobacco from 1990 to 2021: a global burden of disease study 2021. BMC Public Health Feb. 2025;4(1):456.
41.
Luo Z, Xu W, Jiang S, et al. The mediating role of negative emotions in the relationship between smoking and health-related quality of life among Chinese individuals: A cross-sectional study. Tob Induc Dis. 2023;21:135.
42.
Amerzadeh M, Shafiei Kisomi Z, Senmar M, Khatooni M, Hosseinkhani Z, Bahrami M. Self-care behaviors, medication adherence status, and associated factors among elderly individuals with type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep Aug. 2024;18(1):19118.
43.
Wang Y, Gong X, Cheng J, et al. Mediating effect of illness perception between self-care ability and health-promoting behaviors among patients with stable coronary artery disease. PLoS ONE. 2025;20(2):e0316551.
44.
Enggarwati P, Dahlia D, Maria R. Social support as a mediator between depressive symptoms and self-care activities in adults patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Public Health Res Dec 1 2021;11(2).
Total words in MS: 5457
Total words in Title: 19
Total words in Abstract: 252
Total Keyword count: 5
Total Images in MS: 2
Total Tables in MS: 6
Total Reference count: 44