Sulfate resistance of steel slag-ore slag-fly ash-based recycled concrete under dry-wet cycling conditions: Strengthening recycled aggregates with cement-silica fume
A
Haifeng Wan 1
Huijie Wei 1✉ Email
Lei Gao 2
Cheng Jin 1✉ Email
Zuowei Liu 1✉ Email
Lei. Gao@csiro 1
L. au 1✉ Email
Gao 1
1 School of Civil Engineering Yantai University 264005 Yantai Shandong China
2 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Waite Campus 5064 Urrbrae SA Australia
Haifeng Wan a,z,2,*, Huijie Wei a, Lei Gao b, Cheng Jin a, Zuowei Liu a
a School of Civil Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai, Shandong 264005, China.
b Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Waite Campus, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
z,2 Corresponding author.
E-mail address: ytuwan@126.com (H. Wan), w1752575832@163.com (H. Wei), Lei.Gao@csiro.au (L. Gao), 862286579@qq.com (C. Jin), liuzuowei@ytu.edu.cn (Z. Liu).
Abstract
To address the insufficient sulfate resistance of recycled aggregate concrete in construction waste resource utilization, this study applied cement-silica fume treatment technology to steel slag-ore slag-fly ash-based cementitious solid waste concrete. By adjusting the replacement rates of recycled aggregate (RA) (70%, 100%) and cementitious material dosages (9%, 12%, 15%) to prepare specimens. Through mechanical property testing, sulfate dry-wet cycle testing, and microscopic characterization, the study investigated the effects and mechanisms of these factors. Results showed that cement-silica fume treatment increased the apparent density of recycled aggregates by 0.39%, reduced the crushing value by 4.5%, and elevated silicon and calcium content by 52% and 83%, respectively, thereby improving aggregate properties and the interfacial transition zone. Regarding mechanical properties, increased cementitious material content enhanced concrete strength at all ages. After cement-silica fume modification, strength loss at 100% RCA replacement rate was mitigated: the TR-100-15 group achieved 32.2 MPa compressive strength at 60 days, while the TR-70-15 group reached 6.5 MPa flexural strength at 60 days. Regarding sulfate resistance, the synergistic effect of high cementitious material content and cement-fly ash modification was significant. The TR-70-15 group achieved a corrosion resistance coefficient of 0.74 after 75 cycles, while the gap between the TR-100-15 group and the 70% replacement rate group narrowed. This study provides support for mix design and sulfate resistance optimization in high-replacement solid waste concrete.
Keywords:
recycled aggregate modification
concrete
solid waste
sulfate attack
microstructure
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
A
Funding
declaration
The work is supported by financial grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2023QE205). The authors are very grateful for the financial contribution and convey their appreciation for supporting this basic research.
A
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available in “Mendeley Data” at http://doi.org/10.17632/ptpbs6k5f2.1.
1 Introduction
With the acceleration of global industrialization and the continuous advancement of urbanization, the construction industry is booming, and the amount of construction waste generated is also increasing enormously [1]. The issue of construction waste treatment and reuse has become an urgent environmental challenge. Traditional methods of construction waste treatment mostly involve landfilling or open-air stacking. This not only occupies a large amount of valuable land resources but may also trigger a series of environmental problems such as soil pollution and water pollution [2]. Meanwhile, the substantial amount of reusable resources contained in construction waste has not been effectively developed, resulting in tremendous resource waste [34]. Recycled aggregate (RA) concrete has opened up a new avenue for the resource utilization of construction waste [5]. RA is obtained by processing discarded concrete, bricks, stones, and other construction waste through crushing, screening, and other processes. It can be used as a substitute for natural aggregates in concrete production [6]. However, RA has certain differences in performance compared to natural aggregates. Its surface is usually coated with old cement mortar, and there may be numerous micro-cracks and pores inside. It has a relatively high water absorption rate. These characteristics pose challenges to the durability of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC), especially its sulfate resistance [78].
Sulfate attack is one of the common forms of durability damage to concrete structures in practical engineering applications [9]. In some specific engineering environments, such as ports, bridges, and underground structures, concrete structures frequently come into contact with sulfate solutions. Sulfates react chemically with the hydration products in concrete, generating expansive products. This leads to the generation of internal stresses in the concrete, subsequently causing damage phenomena such as cracks and spalling, severely affecting the service life of concrete structures [1013]. Wang J et al. found that the surface sulfate ion concentration has a limited impact on the sulfate ion erosion rate in RAC, while the water-cement ratio significantly affects the sulfate resistance in RAC. The sulfate attack process is largely unaffected by the thickness of the interfacial transition zone [14]. Bai W et al. studied the combined effects of sodium sulfate dry-wet cycling and freeze-thaw cycling on the mechanical properties of carbon fiber-modified RA concrete, revealing the coupling effects of sulfates, dry-wet cycling, and freeze-thaw cycling [15]. Yimeng W et al. conducted durability tests on RAC under sulfate freeze-thaw cycling and found that the main reason for the changes in the surface damage degree of RAC is the variation in the effective water-cement ratio of the mortar caused by the replacement rate and moisture content [16]. Adding an appropriate amount of mineral admixtures such as fly ash and slag powder can participate in the cement hydration reaction, fill the pores inside the concrete, improve the microstructure of the concrete, and thus enhance its sulfate resistance [13].
In addition, surface treatment of RA is also one of the effective approaches to improve the sulfate resistance of RAC [17]. Common surface treatment methods include mechanical grinding, chemical cleaning, and heat treatment. Mechanical grinding can remove part of the old cement mortar on the surface of RA, reducing its adverse impact on new concrete. Chemical cleaning can dissolve impurities on the surface of RA using specific chemical reagents, thereby lowering its water absorption rate. Heat treatment can dehydrate and harden the old cement mortar on the surface of RA, enhancing the strength and durability of RA [1820]. These surface treatment methods have, to a certain extent, improved the performance of RA, thus enhancing the sulfate resistance of RAC.
The optimization of the cementitious material system is also an important means to enhance the sulfate resistance of solid waste-based concrete. Traditional cement-based cementitious materials have certain limitations in terms of sulfate resistance. However, incorporating industrial solid wastes such as slag, fly ash, and silica fume as supplementary cementitious materials into concrete can significantly improve the microstructure and erosion resistance of the concrete [2126]. Previously, we conducted relevant research on a new type of cementitious material, SSR, made from steel slag, slag, and fly ash, and found that SSR offers significant environmental benefits [13]. Nevertheless, there are obvious limitations in current related research: Firstly, the application of cement-silica fume treatment for RA is mostly focused on cement-based concrete systems, and there is a severe lack of research on aggregate strengthening for solid waste-based concrete. Secondly, the synergistic influence pattern of the RA content and the dosage of solid waste-based cementitious materials on the sulfate resistance of concrete has not been clarified, making it difficult to guide the mix design of solid waste-based concrete. Thirdly, the research on the microstructural optimization and chemical reaction regulation mechanisms for the synergistic improvement of sulfate resistance by "cement-silica fume-treated RA reinforcing solid waste-based cementitious materials" is insufficient in depth and lacks theoretical support.
Therefore, in this study, solid waste-based concrete specimens with different RA contents (70%, 100%) and different dosages of the cementitious material SSR (9%, 12%, 15%) were prepared. The cement-silica fume treatment technology for RA was applied to SSR solid waste-based concrete for the first time. Through testing methods such as compressive strength tests, flexural strength tests, sulfate dry-wet cycling tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD), the influences of the RA content and the dosage of the cementitious material on the mechanical properties and sulfate resistance of the concrete were analyzed. The influence patterns of cement-silica fume-treated RA and the dosage of the SSR cementitious material on the sulfate resistance of solid waste-based concrete were studied. From the perspectives of microstructure and chemical reactions, the action mechanism by which cement-silica fume-treated RA and the SSR cementitious material synergistically improve the sulfate resistance of the concrete was revealed.
2 Materials and experimental methodology
2.1 Materials
2.1.1 Gelling material
The cementitious material used in this experiment consists of cement and SSR. The cement is P.O42.5 Portland cement, and its performance indicators are shown in Table 1. The cementitious material also includes solid waste-based cementitious material SSR, which is composed of steel slag, slag, and fly ash [27], and its performance indicators are presented in Table 2.
Table 1
Performance Index of P.O42.5 Portland Cement
Type of material
Density G/cm 3
Specific surface area kg/m 2
Fineness/%
Setting time
Technical requirements
3100
3.56
5
Initial setting ≥ 45 min
Final setting ≤ 254h
Table 2
Performance Indexes of SSR
Type of material
Density G/cm 3
Specific surface area kg/m 2
Fineness/%
Moisture content/%
Setting time
Technical requirements
≥ 2700
≥ 350
≤ 10
≤ 1
Initial setting ≥ 180min
6h ≤ final setting ≤ 10h
2.1.2 Recycled coarse aggregates
The RA used in this experiment was crushed by a crusher, with the particle size controlled between 5 and 30 millimeters. The crushed RA was then classified into three particle size ranges of 5–10 millimeters, 10–20 millimeters, and 20–30 millimeters through a sieve [28]. Subsequently, it underwent modification and strengthening by soaking in cement mixed with a 10% silica fume slurry. The physical indicators of the aggregate are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Physical Indexes of Reinforced Coarse Aggregate
 
Apparent density G/cm3
Water absorption rate/%
Crushing index/%
Not reinforced
2.568
5.4
15.6
Cement-silica fume strengthening
2.597
6.9
10.8
In this experiment, the recovered coarse aggregate was first cleaned and air-dried for later use. Subsequently, a slurry was prepared with a water-cement ratio of 1:1 for the cement paste and a silica fume addition amount of 10%. The coarse aggregate was wrapped in a fishing net and soaked in the slurry. It was turned over every half an hour. After being soaked for 5 hours, it was taken out, and the excess slurry was filtered through a 5-millimeter sieve. After being air-dried, it was placed in a curing cloth for curing treatment. The curing period lasted for 28 days. During the first 7 days, it was turned over every 8 hours and watered for curing, while for the remaining 21 days, it underwent natural strengthening outdoors.
In previous research, we applied SSR to the pile foundations of highway reconstruction and expansion projects [13]. To further reduce costs and enhance efficiency, in this study, we decided to vary the dosage of SSR in concrete to investigate its impact on performance. Therefore, the mass dosages of SSR in this study are 9%, 12%, and 15% respectively, while the replacement rates of RCA are 70% and 100% respectively. The specific mix proportions are detailed in Table 4. Here, SWR represents unstrengthened RCA with cement as the cementitious material, and SR represents RCA strengthened with cement-silica fume and cement as the cementitious material. Correspondingly, TWR denotes unstrengthened RCA with SSR as the cementitious material, and TR denotes RCA strengthened with cement-silica fume and SSR as the cementitious material. In "TR-a-b", "a" represents the replacement rate (%) of RCA, and "b" represents the mass dosage (%) of SSR.
Table 4
Mix Proportion of Concrete Sample
Number
SSR/kg·m− 3
Sand
/kg·m− 3
Aggregates /kg·m− 3
Water
/kg·m− 3
Natural
Recycled
SWR-100-12
287
873
0
1004
163
SR-100-12
287
873
0
1004
163
TWR-70-9
215
924
339
741
163
TWR-100-9
215
924
0
1058
123
TWR-70-12
287
873
320
700
123
TWR-100-12
287
873
0
1000
163
TWR-70-15
359
822
301
659
163
TWR-100-15
359
822
942
204
204
TR-70-9
215
924
358
767
123
TR-100-9
215
924
0
1096
123
TR-70-12
287
873
347
742
163
TR-100-12
287
873
0
1060
163
TR-70-15
359
822
335
717
204
TR-100-15
359
822
0
1024
204
2.2 Specimen preparation and test method
2.2.1 Compressive strength
In accordance with JTG3420-2020 [29], cube specimens with dimensions of 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm were prepared. When the specimens were cured for 7 days, 28 days, and 60 days respectively, they were taken out from the curing room and tested at a loading rate of 0.4 MPa/s, with the failure strengths recorded.
2.2.2 Flexural strength
Based on JTG3420-2020 [29], prismatic specimens with dimensions of 150 mm × 150 mm × 550 mm were prepared and cured in a standard curing environment. After being cured for 7 days, 28 days, and 60 days respectively, flexural tests on the prismatic specimens were conducted.
2.2.3 Sulfate resistance test
According to JTG3420-2020 [29], cube specimens with dimensions of 100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm were prepared and cured indoors for 28 days. Subsequently, the specimens were immersed in a 5% sodium sulfate solution at a temperature of 23 ± 2°C, with the immersion depth being 20 mm above the surface of the specimens. The immersion time was 15 hours, as shown in Fig. 1. After that, the specimens were dried for 7 hours, and this constituted one cycle period. The cycle durations were 0 d, 15 d, 30 d, 45 d, 60 d, and 75 d respectively. A specimen was considered to have failed when its strength corrosion resistance coefficient reached 75%.
Fig. 1
Sulfate Test
Click here to Correct
The sulfate erosion resistance coefficient and mass loss rate are calculated according to (Eq. 1 and Eq. 2), respectively.
1
Click here to Correct
Where:
Click here to download actual image
is the compressive strength corrosion resistance coefficient,
Click here to download actual image
is the measured value of compressive strength of concrete subjected to sulfate corrosion after N dry and wet cycles, and
Click here to download actual image
is the measured value of compressive strength of control concrete.
2
Click here to Correct
Where:
Click here to download actual image
is the rate of mass loss,
Click here to download actual image
is the initial mass of the concrete specimen, and
Click here to download actual image
is the mass of the concrete time after N wet and dry cycles.
3 Results and discussions
3.1 Cement- silica fume mortar reinforcement
As shown in Table 5, compared to the unreinforced RA, the cement-silica fume slurry reinforcement increased the apparent density by 0.39%, raised the water absorption rate by 1.9%, and reduced the crushing value by 4.5%. This improvement is attributed to the finer particle size of silica fume, which enables more effective filling of pores and cracks.
SEM-EDS tests were conducted on RA reinforced with a cement-silica fume slurry at a water-to-cement ratio of 1.0. Figures 2 and 3 present SEM images of the RA surface before and after reinforcement. The RA surface is covered with a significant amount of hardened mortar, exhibiting an uneven morphology with numerous pores, which results in high water absorption, low density, and relatively weak strength [30]. After reinforcement with cement-silica fume, the aggregate structure becomes denser, displaying a crystalline skeletal structure. Hydration products of cement and silica fume cover the RA surface, filling the voids. The EDS results for RA before and after reinforcement are shown in Fig. 4. Tables 5 and 6 provide the elemental contents of RA before and after cement-silica fume reinforcement. Due to the addition of silica fume and cement hydration reactions, the contents of Ca, Si, and S in the RA significantly increase.
By comparing the results before and after reinforcement, it is found that the silicon content in the aggregate significantly increases after reinforcement, rising by 52%, and the calcium content also significantly increases, rising by 83%. Based on their mass ratios, it can be inferred that a large amount of calcium silicate is generated on the surface of the treated aggregate, filling the tiny cracks and pores in the aggregate [3133].
Table 5
Physical Properties Before and After RA Treatment
 
Not reinforced
After processing cement and silica fume
Apparent density/kg/m³
2560
2597
Water absorption rate/(%)
5.0
6.9
Crush value/(%)
15.3
10.8
Fig. 2
SEM image before RA enhancement
Click here to Correct
Fig. 3
SEM image after RA enhancement
Click here to Correct
Fig. 4
EDS elemental composition of RA. (a)Before RA enhancement, ༈b༉After RA enhancement
Click here to Correct
Table 5
EDS element content before RA treatment
Element
Quality (%)
Normalized mass
Other
C
19.53
65.96
2.80
O
4.38
14.78
0.95
Al
0.52
1.76
0.06
Si
1.96
6.63
0.13
S
0.61
2.06
0.06
Ca
2.23
7.52
0.14
Fe
0.39
1.31
0.09
Table 6
EDS elemental content after RA strengthening
Element
Quality (%)
Normalized mass
Other
C
5.03
10.25
1.10
O
18.65
37.97
3.08
Al
0.45
0.92
0.06
Si
5.66
11.53
0.29
S
1.36
2.78
0.10
Ca
17.76
36.15
0.68
Fe
0.20
0.41
0.08
3.2 Compressive strength
As shown in Fig. 5, when the RA replacement rate is consistently maintained at 70% or 100% and regardless of whether the RA undergoes cement-fly ash modification, increasing the SSR dosage from 9% to 15% results in a continuous increase in the compressive strength of the concrete at 7d, 28d, and 60d. This trend is particularly pronounced in promoting the long-term strength at 28d and 60d in cement-fly ash modified RAC. When the SSR dosage is fixed and RA is not modified with cement-silica fume, increasing the RA replacement rate from 70% to 100% significantly reduces compressive strength at all ages. However, in cement-fly ash-modified RAC, the adverse effect of 100% replacement on strength was effectively mitigated. Combined with a 15% SSR dosage, the 60-day compressive strength of 100% replacement concrete still reached 32.2 MPa, fully demonstrating the synergistic strengthening effect between cement-fly ash-treated RA and SSR cementitious materials. Furthermore, the compressive strength of TR-70-15 surpassed that of cement-based RAC processed under identical conditions, demonstrating that this synergistic effect enables solid waste-based concrete to achieve superior mechanical properties.
Fig. 5
Compressive strength of SSR concrete. (a)100% RA, ༈b༉70% RA
Click here to Correct
3.2 Flexural strength
As shown in Fig. 6, with the increase in the incorporation amount of SSR, the macroscopic pores inside the RAC gradually decrease, and a more uniform failure area is formed on the flexural fracture surface. From the flexural strength results in Fig. 7, SSR, as a cementitious material composed of steel slag, slag, and fly ash, when its incorporation amount increases, more active components such as the glassy phase in the slag and calcium-magnesium minerals in the steel slag participate in the hydration reaction, thus providing a material basis and structural support for the development of flexural strength [3435]. It can be seen from the strength growth trend from 7d to 60d that with the prolongation of the curing age, the flexural strength exhibits significant time dependence. The flexural strength of TR-70-15 reaches 6.5MPa at 60d, which is more than 2.6 times higher than that at 7d.
In the group of unmodified RA, the flexural strength of concrete with a 100% replacement rate is generally slightly lower than that with a 70% replacement rate. However, in the TR series modified with cement-silica fume, the gap in flexural strength between the 100% replacement rate and the 70% replacement rate is significantly narrowed. Moreover, with a 5% SSR incorporation amount, the flexural strength of TR-100-15 at 60d reaches 6.2MPa, which is only 4.6% lower than that of TR-70-15. This indicates that cement-silica fume modification can effectively mitigate the adverse impact of a high RA replacement rate on the flexural performance of concrete. The synergistic effect of cement-silica fume modification and SSR cementitious material can achieve the optimization of the flexural performance of solid waste-based concrete.
Fig. 6
Flexural strength of concrete at different SSR dosages
Click here to Correct
Fig. 7
Flexural strength of SSR concrete
Click here to Correct
3.3 Sulfate resistance test
As illustrated in Fig. 8, when the RA treatment method and replacement rate are fixed, as the SSR incorporation amount increases from 9% to 15%, the overall decline rate of the corrosion resistance coefficient of the concrete slows down, and its resistance to sulfate attack is enhanced. With a 70% RA replacement rate, the corrosion resistance coefficient of TWR-70-15 still reaches 0.65 after 75 cycles, which is significantly higher than the 0.61 of TWR-70-9 after 45 cycles. In the TR series reinforced with cement-silica fume, the corrosion resistance coefficient of TR-70-15 is 0.74 after 75 cycles, higher than the 0.69 of TR-70-9 after 45 cycles. Moreover, the groups with a high SSR incorporation amount can still maintain a relatively high corrosion resistance coefficient after a greater number of cycles. This is because a high incorporation amount of SSR can involve more active components in the reaction, generating denser hydration products and impeding the invasion of sulfate ions.
In terms of the RA replacement rate, in the TWR series with unreinforced RA, the corrosion resistance coefficient decreases relatively faster under a 100% RA replacement rate, and its resistance to sulfate attack is slightly inferior to that of the 70% replacement rate group. However, in the TR series reinforced with cement-silica fume, the gap in the corrosion resistance coefficient between the 100% replacement rate and the 70% replacement rate is significantly narrowed. The corrosion resistance coefficient of TR-100-15 reaches 0.70 after 75 cycles, which is relatively close to the 0.74 of TR-70-15. This indicates that cement-silica fume modification can effectively mitigate the adverse impact of a high RA replacement rate on the concrete's resistance to sulfate attack by repairing surface defects of RA and strengthening the interfacial transition zone between the aggregate and the cementitious matrix. It works synergistically with the SSR cementitious material to optimize the resistance to sulfate attack of solid waste-based concrete.
Fig. 8
Corrosion resistance coefficient of SSR concrete
Click here to Correct
A
Figure 9 shows the mass loss rate of concrete under sulfate dry-wet cycles. As the dosage of SSR—a cementitious material composed of steel slag, blast furnace slag, and fly ash—increases, the generated calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel and other products fill pores at the microscopic scale and optimize the interfacial transition zone [34]. This provides structural support for maintaining compressive strength and corrosion resistance coefficient while simultaneously hindering sulfate ion penetration due to the dense structure. Consequently, leaching of concrete constituents is reduced, leading to a lower mass loss rate [13]. At 75 cycles, TR-70-15 achieved a corrosion resistance coefficient of 0.74 and a mass loss rate of 74%, outperforming TR-70-9 with a lower SSR content. Regarding RA replacement rate, unreinforced RA exhibits inherent microcracks, pores, and weak interfaces. At high replacement rates, sulfate erosion readily penetrates along these defects, causing rapid corrosion coefficient decline and increased mass loss rate [3641]. TWR-100-9 recorded a corrosion coefficient of only 0.61 and a mass loss rate of 61% after 45 cycles, inferior to TWR-70-9. Conversely, cement-silica fume modification effectively “compensates” for the adverse effects of high replacement ratios by repairing aggregate defects and strengthening interfaces: TR-100-15 exhibited a corrosion resistance coefficient of 0.70 and a mass loss rate of 70% after 75 cycles, significantly narrowing the gap with TR-70-15. This approach brings the sulfate resistance of high-replacement-ratio RACs close to that of the 70% replacement ratio group.
Fig. 9
Mass loss rate of SSR concrete
Click here to Correct
3.2 Microstructure
Through the analysis of mechanical and durability properties, it was ultimately decided to conduct microscopic tests on the TWR-100-12 and TR-100-12 groups. Figure 10 shows the SEM images of TWR-100-12 and TR-100-12 before and after sulfate attack. Before the attack, the RA surface in TWR-100-12 had residual micro-cracks, pores, and a weak mortar layer. Meanwhile, the C-S-H gel generated from the hydration of the SSR cementitious material was sparsely distributed, and there were many unhydrated particles remaining in the matrix. In contrast, after being reinforced with cement-silica fume, in TR-100-12, the C-S-H gel and the products of the silica fume's pozzolanic effect filled the surface defects of the aggregate. Moreover, the hydration products in the reinforcement layer could promote the secondary hydration of the active components in SSR, supplemented by the filling of micropores by silica fume, resulting in a more continuous network of hydration products in the matrix [4244]. After sulfate attack, the loose interface in TWR-100-12 provided a rapid pathway for the invasion of sulfate ions. The ettringite and plate-like gypsum generated from the reaction between sulfate ions and hydration products caused the matrix to expand, exhibiting a honeycomb-like loose structure [4547]. The cement-silica fume reinforcement layer in TR-100-12 hindered the rapid invasion of sulfate ions. The C-S-H gel network did not undergo global destruction, and the overall degree of deterioration was much less severe than that of TWR-100-12.
Fig. 10
SEM images of TWR-100-12 and TR-100-12 before and after sulfate erosion
Click here to Correct
By referring to the XRD results in Fig. 11, the differences in the phase composition and evolution between TWR-100-12 and TR-100-12 can be identified. Essentially, these differences stem from the regulatory effect of RA modification on the types of hydration products, the residual amount of unhydrated minerals, and the formation of sulfate attack products. Prior to sulfate attack, since TWR-100-12 lacks cement-silica fume activation, the SSR cementitious material predominantly undergoes low-calcium hydration. In the XRD pattern, the broadened and dispersed peak of C-S-H gel dominates, while the peaks of calcium hydroxide and AFt are weak. Additionally, the characteristic peaks of unhydrated slag and steel slag are prominent. In contrast, the cement-silica fume reinforcement layer in TR-100-12 promotes high-calcium hydration in coordination with the SSR reaction. This results in an increase in the intensity of the C-S-H dispersed peak, a significant enhancement of the CH and AFt peaks, and a substantial reduction in the peaks of unhydrated minerals due to the complete hydration of SSR triggered by alkaline activation. After sulfate attack, in TWR-100-12, the intensity of the gypsum peak surges, while the C-S-H dispersed peak and CH peak nearly disappear, indicating severe degradation of the original products. In TR-100-12, however, due to the reinforcement layer's obstruction of SO₄²⁻ intrusion, the gypsum peak only appears weakly, and the C-S-H and CH peaks only experience a slight reduction. The phase stability of TR-100-12 is significantly superior to that of TWR-100-12, fully demonstrating the optimizing effect of cement-silica fume modification on the phase evolution of SSR-based concrete under sulfate attack.
Fig. 11
XRD results of TWR-100-12 and TR-100-12 before and after sulfate erosion
Click here to Correct
As shown in Fig. 12, prior to sulfate attack, in TWR-100-12, the hydration of SSR generates C-S-H. The Si-O stretching vibration peak is located in the range of 950–1000 cm⁻¹ and is weak and broadened. The characteristic peak of CO₃²⁻ is weak, and the -OH stretching vibration peak is weak, with the -OH peak of CH (3640 cm⁻¹) being invisible, indicating low contents of bound water and CH. In contrast, the cement-silica fume reinforcement layer in TR-100-12 promotes the formation of high-calcium C-S-H. The Si-O peak shifts to the range of 1000–1050 cm⁻¹ and becomes strong and sharp. The intensity of the CO₃²⁻ peak increases, the intensity of the -OH peak significantly rises, and the -OH peak of CH is clearly visible, indicating an enrichment of bound water and CH.
After sulfate attack, in TWR-100-12, the intensity of the Si-O peak drastically decreases and the peak shape becomes fragmented. The intensity of the -OH peak drops sharply, and the peak of adsorbed water disappears, indicating a significant loss of water. In TR-100-12, however, due to the reinforcement layer's obstruction of SO₄²⁻ intrusion, the Si-O peak only experiences a slight decrease and its position remains stable. The CO₃²⁻ peak rises gradually, the -OH peak decreases slightly, and the peak of adsorbed water remains stable. This fully demonstrates the optimizing effect of cement-silica fume modification on the chemical structural stability of SSR-based concrete under sulfate attack.
As illustrated in Fig. 13, the essential difference in the mechanisms of TWR-100-12 and TR-100-12 under sulfate attack lies in the regulatory discrepancies of RA modification on the sulfate ion transport efficiency and the erosion resistance stability of hydration products.
In TWR-100-12, due to the presence of micro-cracks and a weak mortar layer remaining on the unreinforced RA surface, a wide and porous interfacial transition zone (ITZ) is formed with the SSR cementitious material. Additionally, a significant amount of unhydrated particles remains in the SSR cementitious matrix, enabling SO₄²⁻ to rapidly penetrate into the interior [3941]. Meanwhile, its hydration products primarily consist of low calcium-to-silicon ratio (C/S) C-S-H gel and a trace amount of calcium hydroxide (CH). The low-calcium C-S-H has a low degree of polymerization in its silicate framework, making it susceptible to destruction by SO₄²⁻. CH rapidly reacts with SO₄²⁻ to form expansive gypsum. The expansion causes interfacial delamination and matrix cracking, ultimately leading to rapid structural deterioration [45].
In contrast, the cement-silica fume reinforcement layer in TR-100-12 fills the surface defects of RA, forming a dense transition shell and promoting the generation of high C/S ratio C-S-H in SSR. This significantly retards the migration of SO₄²⁻ [46]. The continuous cement hydration supplements CH, maintaining a high alkalinity in the system. As a result, only a small amount of gypsum is formed on the surface layer by SO₄²⁻. The expansive stress is buffered by the dense matrix, causing only micro-cracks on the surface layer while keeping the internal structure intact [47].
Fig. 12
FT-IR results of TWR-100-12 and TR-100-12 before and after sulfate erosion
Click here to Correct
Fig. 13
Mechanism of erosion resistance before and after aggregate reinforcement
Click here to Correct
4. Conclusions
This study prepared solid waste-based concrete with different amounts of recycled aggregate (RA) and solid-state reaction (SSR) cementitious material, and conducted an in-depth exploration of the impacts of cement-silica fume treatment of RA and SSR cementitious material on the mechanical properties and sulfate attack resistance of the concrete. The following conclusions were drawn:
(1)The treatment with cement-silica fume has a significant optimizing effect on the performance of RA. After treatment, the apparent density of RA increases by 0.39%, and the crushing value decreases by 4.5%. Although the water absorption rate slightly increases (from 5.0% to 6.9%), the overall performance is better. The silicon content in the treated aggregate increases by 52%, and the calcium content increases by 83%. This not only enhances the inherent strength of the aggregate but also improves the interfacial transition zone between the aggregate and the cementitious matrix, laying a foundation for the subsequent improvement of the mechanical properties and sulfate attack resistance of the concrete.
(2)The content of RA, the dosage of SSR cementitious material, and cement-silica fume treatment jointly determine the mechanical properties of the concrete. When the replacement rate of RA is fixed, an increase in the SSR content leads to a continuous growth in the concrete strength. Moreover, the cement-silica fume treated group shows a more significant promotion in the long-term strength at 28 days and 60 days. After modification with cement-silica fume, the 60-day compressive strength of the TR-100-15 group reaches 32.2 MPa, and the 60-day flexural strength of the TR-70-15 group reaches 6.5 MPa, which is more than 2.6 times higher than that at 7 days. The adverse effect of a 100% RA replacement rate is substantially mitigated, narrowing the strength gap between the cases with 100% and 70% RA replacement rates.
(3)In terms of sulfate attack resistance durability, the synergistic effects of various factors are remarkable. When the RA treatment method and replacement rate are fixed, as the SSR content increases from 9% to 15%, the rate of decline in the corrosion resistance coefficient of the concrete slows down, indicating enhanced erosion resistance. Regarding the influence of the RA replacement rate, in the unreinforced TWR series, the group with a 100% replacement rate experiences a faster decline in the corrosion resistance coefficient. In contrast, after modification with cement-silica fume in the TR series, the gap in the corrosion resistance coefficient between the groups with 100% and 70% replacement rates narrows. The corrosion resistance coefficient of the TR-100-15 group after 75 cycles is 0.70, close to the 0.74 of the TR-70-15 group. Moreover, a high SSR content and cement-silica fume modification can significantly reduce mass loss, effectively delaying the deterioration of the concrete caused by sulfate attack and extending its service life.
(4)The synergistic effect of cement-silica fume treatment of RA and SSR cementitious material enhances the sulfate attack resistance of concrete. The defects in the treated aggregate are filled with C-S-H and pozzolanic products. The secondary hydration of SSR increases the density of the matrix, blocking the intrusion of sulfates. After erosion, the interface in the untreated group becomes loose, and ettringite and gypsum cause honeycomb-like damage. In contrast, the structure in the treated group remains intact, inhibiting the generation of expansive substances.
In the future, it is necessary to conduct durability research in complex environmental scenarios by integrating actual engineering situations, such as coupled erosion of sulfates and chlorides, coupled effects of sulfate attack and freeze-thaw cycles, and coupled impacts of sulfate attack and loading. The aim is to explore the deterioration mechanisms of the synergistic system of cement-silica fume treated RA and SSR cementitious material under the influence of multiple factors.
A
A
Author Contribution
Haifeng Wan: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition. Huijie Wei: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. Lei Gao: Methodology. Cheng Jin: Data curation. Zuowei Liu: Resources, Funding acquisition.
A
Acknowledgement
The work is supported by financial grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2023QE205). The authors are very grateful for the financial contribution and convey their appreciation for supporting this basic research.
References
1.
Bayram B, Greiff K, ,Gerlich L et al Environmental and economic implications of selective demolition and advanced recycling of construction waste[J].Sustainable Production and Consumption,2025,5761-79.
2.
Bonifazi G, Grosso C, ,Palmieri R et al Current trends and challenges in construction and demolition waste recycling[J].Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry,2025,53101032-101032
3.
Hasselsteen L, Stapel BE, ,Birgisdóttir H et al Evaluating the environmental impact of construction waste: A comprehensive analysis of End-of-Life scenarios in Environmental Product Declarations[J].Building and Environment,2025,280113159-113159.
4.
Wang Z, Qin F, ,Liu J et al Evolution trajectory and driving mechanism of the synergistic effect on construction waste and carbon reduction: Evidence from China.[J].Waste management (New York, N.Y.),2025,203114891
5.
Wu T, Jin L, ,Yu H et al Mesoscale numerical investigation of chloride transport in recycled aggregate concrete considering calcium leaching: Multi-phase and multi-interface[J].Structures,2025,78109307-109307.
6.
Zhou Z, Yang Z, ,Cheng S et al Effect of recycled concrete powder on the performance of alkali-activated slag[J].Case Studies in Construction Materials,2025,22e04811–e04811
7.
Miao Q, Gao Z, ,Zhu K et al Interpretable machine learning model for compressive strength prediction of self-compacting concrete with recycled concrete aggregates and SCMs[J].Journal of Building Engineering,2025,108112965-112965.
8.
Wang Y, Zhang H, ,Su W et al (2025) Towards better understanding of the mechanical properties and durability of recycled aggregate concrete based on the multiple meso-scale material phase analysis[J]. J Building Eng, 108112968–108112968
9.
Qin S, Zhang M, ,Zou D et al Mesoscale modeling of mechanical deterioration in sulfate-attacked concrete[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2025,323111229-111229.
10.
Wu D, Wang Y, ,Zhang J Synergistic effects of sisal fiber and steel fiber on the mechanical properties of geopolymer under sulfate erosion[J].Construction and Building Materials,2025,483141790-141790.
11.
Belghali M, Ayed K, ,Ezziane M et al The influence of sulfate attack on existing concrete bridges: Study of external sulfate attack (ESA)[J].Construction and Building Materials,2025,483141751-141751.
12.
Meng F, Lu D, ,Wang G et al Study on chemo-mechanical damage of concrete under the coupling action of sulfate attack environment and cyclic loading[J].Construction and Building Materials,2024,457139343-139343.
13.
Wei H, Wan H, ,Yuan S et al A new gelling material: Properties of recycled aggregate concrete under conditions of complete cement replacement using steel slag, ore slag, and fly ash[J].Construction and Building Materials,2025,464140180-140180.
14.
Wang J, Fu M, ,Zheng K et al Ion transport mechanism and diffusion model establishment in recycled aggregate concrete subjected to magnesium, sulfate, and chloride attack[J].Construction and Building Materials,2024,428136273-.
15.
Bai W, Wang X, ,Yuan C et al Macro-mechanical properties and fine scale damage mechanism of carbon fiber-modified recycled coarse aggregate concrete under sodium sulfate-dry-wet and freeze-thaw cycling coupling effects[J].Journal of Building Engineering,2024,88109157-.
16.
Yimeng W, Xingzhou C, ,Junrui C et al Correlation between mechanical properties and pore structure deterioration of recycled concrete under sulfate freeze-thaw cycles: An experimental study[J].Construction and Building Materials,2024,412134794-.
17.
Raman MVJ, Somiyadevi P, ,Kandasamy S Evaluation of Various Treatment Methods for Enhancing the Recycled Aggregate Concrete[J]. Int J Pavement Res Technol 2024 (prepublish):1–19
18.
Hoang XD, Trinh PB, ,Yuko O et al Effect of the strength grade of parent concrete on the performance of recycled aggregate treated by cement-fly ash slurry under prolonged soaking duration[J].Construction and Building Materials,2024,411134528-.
19.
Kumar PS, Puja R Experimental investigation and SVR model to predict the mechanical properties of RAC by enhancing the characteristic of RCA using surface treatment method along with modified mixing approach[J].Construction and Building Materials,2023,393
20.
Zhang H, Ji T, ,Liu H et al Modifying recycled aggregate concrete by aggregate surface treatment using sulphoaluminate cement and basalt powder[J].Construction and Building Materials,2018,192526-537.
21.
Gao G, Xu H, ,Bao J et al Durability-related properties of alkali-activated recycled aggregate concrete: Effect of alkali equivalent, recycled coarse aggregate replacement rate and slag content[J].Construction and Building Materials,2025,486142018-142018.
22.
Wang Y, Hu Y, ,Mangabhai R et al Engineering properties and sustainability of alkali-activated fly ash-slag mortar containing carbon-negative aggregates[J].Construction and Building Materials,2025,471140668-140668.
23.
Shahid BN, Mutsuddy R, ,Islam RS Synergistic impact of supplementary cementitious materials (silica fume and fly ash) and nylon fiber on properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete[J].Case Studies in Construction Materials,2025,22e04484–e04484
24.
Shankar UB, Pasla D A mix design procedure for fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag based treated recycled aggregate concrete[J].Cleaner Engineering and Technology,2021,5
25.
Martini AS, Khartabil A, ,Neithalath N (2021) Rheological Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Incorporating Supplementary Cementitious Materials[J]. ACI Mater J 118(6):241–253
26.
Tao M, Dawang D, ,Xiufen Y et al Effect of Fly Ash on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Cement-Stabilized Materials with 100%. Recycled Mixed Aggregates[J] Minerals 2021, 11(9):992–992
27.
Wei H, Wan H, ,Gao L et al All-solid-waste concrete with novel gelling particles solid-loaded with bacteria: Mechanical properties and crack repair prediction[J].Construction and Building Materials,2025,484141853-141853.
28.
Cai P, Mao X, ,Lai X et al Particle crushing mechanism of recycled aggregate with different component categories: applied to pervious concrete base[J]. J Sustainable Cement-Based Mater 2024, 13(12):1879–1894
29.
Test Procedures for Cement (2005) and Cement Concrete in Highway Engineering: JTG E30-2005 [S]
30.
Peng Y, Cai S, ,Huang Y et al Recycled Aggregates Sustainable Construction: Strength Strategies Emerg Frontiers[J] Mater 2025, 18(13):3013–3013
31.
Luo W, He X, ,Li R et al (2025) Investigation of internal-external enhanced method for recycled aggregate[J]. Constr Build Mater, 467140405–467140405
32.
Liu T, Yan X, ,Zhang B (2025). Study on the Properties and Strengthening Treatment of Recycled Aggregates[J].Journal of Physics: Conference Series,2941(1):012031–012031
33.
LiangX,QinX, ZuoZ Research on the performance and strengthening mechanism of composite-enhanced recycled aggregate concrete[J]. Int J Appl Ceramic Technol 2024, 22(3):e15020–e15020
34.
Wei H, Wan H, ,Gao L et al All-solid-waste concrete with novel gelling particles solid-loaded with bacteria: Mechanical properties and crack repair prediction[J].Construction and Building Materials,2025,484141853-141853.
35.
Teng J, Shi N, Wan H et al Study on Mechanical and Frost Resistance Properties of Soil Solidification Rock Recycled Aggregate Concrete[J].Engineering Letters,2025,33(2)
36.
Zhang X, Li M, ,Wang C et al Multi-parameter analysis of nano-SiO₂ modified recycled aggregate concrete: Fatigue damage and microscopic mechanisms[J].Structures,2025,79109414-109414
37.
Bai W, Geng Y, ,Yuan C et al (2025) Mesoscopic damage behavior of recycled aggregate concrete modified with metakaolin under the combined effects of freeze–thaw cycles and sulfate attack[J]. Archives Civil Mech Eng 25(2):91–91
38.
Liu K, Fu K, ,Bao J et al (2025) Damage mechanism and mechanical behavior of recycled aggregate concrete under the coupled compressive loading and sulfate erosion[J]. J Building Eng, 99111664–99111664
39.
Qiao G, Wang Y, ,Wang Y et al Numerical simulation of strengthening/deterioration and damage development of cementitious materials under sulfate attack environment[J].Structures,2024,70107542-107542
40.
Jin L, Wu T, ,Liu P et al Macro-meso degradation evolution of fully recycled coarse aggregate concrete under sulfate attack in marine environment[J].Structures,2024,69107536-107536
41.
Jin L, Wang Z, ,Wu T et al (2024) Damage-based ion transport in recycled aggregate concrete under external sulfate attack[J]. Constr Build Mater, 445137944–445137944
42.
Bai W, Suo G, ,Yuan C et al Study on multi-scale dynamic mechanical properties of metakaolin modified recycled aggregate concrete under coupling conditions of sulfate attack and dry-wet cycles[J].Journal of Building Engineering,2024,94109921-.
43.
Libing J, Tian W, ,Tai F et al A Five-Phase Mesoscale Numerical Analysis Method for the Sulfate Attack Process on Recycled Aggregate Concrete[J]. J Mater Civil Eng 2024, 36(7)
44.
Wang J, Fu M, ,Zheng K et al Ion transport mechanism and diffusion model establishment in recycled aggregate concrete subjected to magnesium, sulfate, and chloride attack[J].Construction and Building Materials,2024,428136273-.
45.
Yimmy SF, Silvio D, ,William V et al Performance of Self-Compacting Concrete with Residue of Masonry and Recycled Aggregate under Sulfate Attack[J]. J Mater Civil Eng 2024, 36(1)
46.
L S,A. Y Z V, J. C Z R et al Macroscopic behavior and microstructural analysis of recycled aggregate mortar bars exposed to external sulfate attack[J].Cement and Concrete Composites,2023,143
47.
Xu F, Wang S, ,Li T et al The mechanical properties of tailing recycled aggregate concrete and its resistance to the coupled deterioration of sulfate attack and wetting–drying cycles[J].Structures,2020,272208-2216
Total words in MS: 5188
Total words in Title: 19
Total words in Abstract: 223
Total Keyword count: 5
Total Images in MS: 13
Total Tables in MS: 7
Total Reference count: 47