1. Introduction
1.1 Background and Rationale
Ethiopia's state-led development model historically relied on a tightly managed and overvalued currency, leading to severe foreign exchange rationing (World Bank, 2024). Ethiopia’s foreign exchange regime has been characterized by stringent administrative controls, fixed exchange rates, and pervasive foreign currency shortages. For over three decades, the National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) set official exchange rates and tightly regulated foreign currency transactions, resulting in a persistent gap between official and parallel market rates, widespread rationing, and significant distortions in the allocation of foreign exchange (Mesfin Tafesse & Associates, 2024; NBE, 2024). This policy created fundamental macroeconomic imbalances, manifesting as chronic double-digit inflation and a prohibitive divergence between the official exchange rate and the parallel market rate. By the end of the 2023/24 fiscal year, the parallel market premium had surged past 100 percent (IMF, 2025); functioning as an effective tax on legitimate exporters and severely constraining formal trade (World Bank, 2024).
In response to mounting macroeconomic pressures including high inflation, a widening trade deficit, and acute foreign currency shortages, the Ethiopian government embarked on a comprehensive economic reform agenda under the Home-Grown Economic Reform Plan (HGER 2.0). A cornerstone of this agenda was the liberalization of the foreign exchange regime, culminating in the issuance of NBE Directive FXD/01/2024 on July 29, 2024 (NBE, 2024; EY, 2024).
The FXD/01/2024 Directive introduced a managed float exchange rate system, allowing banks and authorized dealers to buy and sell foreign currency at freely negotiated rates, with the NBE intervening only to address disorderly market conditions (NBE, 2024; EY, 2024). The reform also abolished surrender requirements for export proceeds, improved retention rules (allowing exporters to retain 50% of foreign exchange earnings), lifted most import restrictions, and opened the securities market to foreign investors (NBE, 2024; Mesfin Tafesse & Associates, 2024).
The rationale for foreign exchange liberalization was multifaceted: to unify the official and parallel market rates, boost export competitiveness, attract foreign direct investment (FDI), and ensure that foreign exchange earnings were repatriated through formal channels (NBE, 2024; Sahlemichael Mekonnen Demsse, 2025). The reform was expected to benefit a wide range of stakeholders, including farmers, miners, manufacturers, service providers, and remittance recipients, while also supporting macroeconomic stability and private sector development (NBE, 2024; Birr Metrics, 2025).
This study is, therefore, conducted to address the following research questions:
1.To what extent did the 2024 FX reform improve Ethiopia’s aggregate export competitiveness and foreign exchange inflows?
2.Which export sectors exhibited the most significant competitive gains, and is this acceleration primarily structural or attributable to formalization bias?
3.Did the reform promote export diversification, or did it increase short-term export concentration?
4.What non-price, structural factors (e.g., logistics, regulatory quality, market sophistication) remain the binding barriers to Ethiopia’s long-term export growth?
1.2 Research Objectives
This study is designed to empirically assess the initial efficacy and structural implications of the 2024 foreign exchange liberalization by pursuing the following objectives:
Assess the immediate impact of FX liberalization on aggregate export performance.
Analyze sectoral competitiveness shifts between primary commodities and value-added manufacturing.
Evaluate export diversification using HHI.
Identify structural constraints limiting long-term competitiveness.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Exchange Rate Regimes and Export Performance
The theoretical basis for the reform's impact lies in the concept of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), specifically the relative PPP version, which posits that nominal exchange rate changes should result in a real effective exchange rate (REER) depreciation, making a country’s tradable goods cheaper and more competitive internationally (IMF, n.d.-a). Empirical evidence from liberalization efforts in other Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries supports this link, showing that successful transitions from managed regimes characterized by extensive foreign exchange rationing and sizeable black market premiums led to macroeconomic stabilization and sharply increased per capita real income (IMF, 2013; IMF, 2016).
The choice of exchange rate regime profoundly influences external stability. Analysis within the COMESA region indicates that floating arrangements generally yield superior external stability and lower inflation outturns compared to pegged or heavily managed regimes, provided central banks actively use sterilized intervention to dampen disruptive volatility (COMESA, 2024; COMESA, 2024). Ethiopia’s shift to a managed float is consistent with this regional evidence (NBE, 2024).
2.2 Indicators of Trade Competitiveness and Diversification
Trade performance is typically measured using metrics derived from Ricardian trade theory. Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) calculates a country’s export share of a specific product relative to the global share of that product, indicating where competitive strengths are "revealed" following policy shocks (UNCTAD, n.d.). An increase in a sector's RCA post-reform would reveal a policy-induced improvement in its relative international competitive position.
To measure structural resilience, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for exports is used to quantify the degree of export concentration. A low HHI signifies a diversified export basket, reducing vulnerability to sector-specific external shocks, whereas a high HHI indicates reliance on a narrow base, increasing concentration risk (UNCTAD, n.d.).
2.3 Structural Constraints and Dutch Disease
The literature confirms that while monetary correction (devaluation) is necessary, structural constraints often pose more formidable barriers to sustained export competitiveness. Ethiopia is known to lag behind peers in global competitiveness rankings due to trade restrictions biased against exports and declining overall Doing Business performance (World Bank, 2014; World Bank, 2024). High logistics costs and poor transport infrastructure significantly raise the cost of doing business, imposing a persistent, non-price penalty on exporters (Capital Ethiopia, 2025).
A more fundamental barrier identified is the critically low domestic demand sophistication. Ethiopia scored 12.06 on the African Export Competitiveness Index (AECI) for this measure (African Export Competitiveness Report, 2024). Sophisticated domestic demand is crucial because it compels local firms to innovate and develop high-quality; complex products, thereby acquiring the necessary skills to compete in advanced international markets (African Export Competitiveness Report, 2024).
Finally, the potential for a commodity windfall, like the gold surge observed post-reform, introduces the critical risk of Dutch Disease (IMF, 2024a). If the foreign exchange inflow is not rigorously sterilized, it can trigger a real exchange rate appreciation, eroding the price competitiveness gained by non-resource tradable sectors (e.g., manufacturing) (IMF, 2024a; IMF, 2025a).
2.4. Empirical Evidence: Sub-Saharan Africa
Empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa and other developing economies suggests that exchange rate liberalization, when accompanied by supportive macroeconomic policies, can enhance export performance, reduce foreign exchange shortages, and stimulate economic growth (Maehle et al., 2013; Eshetu & Eshetu, 2023). However, the benefits are not automatic; successful outcomes depend on the sequencing of reforms, institutional readiness, and the capacity to manage inflationary pressures and external shocks (Maehle et al., 2013; Okot et al., 2022).
In Ethiopia’s context, previous devaluations and partial liberalization measures yielded mixed results, with persistent trade imbalances and limited export diversification (Gofe et al., 2023; Eshetu, 2024). The 2024 reform represents the most comprehensive shift to date, warranting a rigorous assessment of its impact on export competitiveness across sectors.
3. Data and Methods
3.1 Data Sources
The empirical evaluation integrates time series data spanning the pre-reform (2018–2023) and post-reform (2024) periods. This study utilizes multiple secondary data sources to ensure a robust and comprehensive analysis:
Trade Flow Data: Export values by HS 2- and 4-digit codes are sourced from UN COMTRADE and ITC Trade Map to calculate RCA and HHI. Detailed RCA data for the top ten export categories (2018–2024) is incorporated for sectoral analysis.
RCA Dataset: Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) values for Ethiopia’s top ten export categories from 2018 to 2024, as calculated and provided by the research team.
Trade Map Indicators: Ethiopia’s trade performance indicators, including export destination shares, product concentration, and market diversification metrics.
Official Documents: NBE Directive FXD/01/2024 and related policy releases.
Secondary Literature: Peer-reviewed articles, working papers, and sectoral reports on exchange rate liberalization, export competitiveness, and trade policy in Ethiopia and comparable economies.
3.2 Data Analysis Technique
Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA)
The RCA index, originally proposed by (Balassa, 1965), measures a country’s relative export performance in a given product or sector compared to the world average. The RCA for country
c in product
p is defined as:
Xij = exports of product j from country i
Xit = total exports of country i
Xwj = world exports of product j
Xwt = total world exports.
An RCA value greater than 1 indicates a revealed comparative advantage (specialization), while a value less than 1 indicates a comparative disadvantage (Jones & Bethmann, 2023; UNCTAD, 2025).
Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI)
The HHI is a widely used measure of market concentration, adapted here to assess the concentration of Ethiopia’s export portfolio (Investopedia,
2025; Gofe et al.,
2023). It is calculated as:
Where Si is the market share (percentage) of export sector i in total exports, expressed as a whole number (not a decimal). The HHI ranges from near zero (highly diversified) to 10,000 (monopoly). In trade analysis:
A
A
HHI < 1,500: Diversified export structure
1,500 ≤ HHI < 2,500: Moderately concentrated
HHI ≥ 2,500: Highly concentrated
Integration of Trade Map Indicators
Trade Map indicators are used to contextualize Ethiopia’s export performance, including:
Export destination diversification (number and share of export markets)
Product concentration (share of top products in total exports)
Market share trends in key destinations
4. Results
4.1 Exchange Rate Convergence
The reform achieved its primary objective of price correction swiftly (IMF, 2025; World Bank, 2024). The massive parallel market premium, elevated above 100 percent (IMF, 2025; IMF, 2024b), narrowed rapidly to under 10 percent (World Bank, 2024).
Source: Computed based on data from ITC, 2025
The macroeconomic impact was immediate and substantial. Ethiopia’s aggregate export revenue surged by 117 percent (year-on-year), in the first quarter of the 2025/26 fiscal year (MoTRI, 2025). This momentum, coupled with "over performance in the accumulation of net international reserves," confirms the policy’s success in unlocking foreign exchange capacity (IMF, 2025b).
A
Source: Figs. 1 is generated using Microsoft Copilot (Microsoft,
2025) based on the data obtained from ITC, 2025
4.2 Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) Analysis (2018–2024)
The analysis of Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) across Ethiopia’s top ten export categories from 2018 to 2024 reveals three distinct trends: established dominance, volatility, and post-reform manufacturing reversal. An RCA value greater than 1 indicates a competitive export advantage.
Table 2
Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) for Ethiopia’s Top Ten Export Categories, 2018–2024
| Export Product Category | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|
1 | Coffee, tea, maté and spices | 118 | 115 | 107 | 148 | 179 | 158 | 142 |
2 | Edible vegetables and certain roots and tubers | 56 | 52 | 50 | 56 | 50 | 43 | 13 |
3 | Oil seeds and oleaginous fruits... | 29 | 30 | 28 | 23 | 15 | 23 | 21 |
4 | Live trees and other plants; cut flowers and ornamental foliage | 74 | 71 | 67 | 75 | 80 | 84 | 86 |
5 | Meat and edible meat offal | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
6 | Raw hides and skins (other than furskins) and leather | 22 | 21 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 11 |
7 | Articles of apparel and clothing accessories, not knitted | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
8 | Articles of apparel and clothing accessories, knitted or crocheted | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
9 | Footwear, gaiters and the like; parts of such articles | 2 | 1 | 0.432 | 0.193 | 0.193 | 0.134 | 0.270 |
10 | Electrical machinery and equipment and parts thereof... | 0.118 | 0.116 | 0.087 | 0.052 | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.022 |
| Note. RCA > 1 indicates comparative advantage. Apparel categories show sharp post-reform gains in 2024. |
| A. Established Dominance (RCA > 1) |
Ethiopia's enduring competitive advantage lies in agricultural and horticultural products. Coffee, tea, maté and spices (Category 1) exhibit an extraordinarily high and robust RCA, consistently exceeding 100 throughout the entire period, peaking at 179.221 in 2022. The 2024 RCA of 141.632 confirms its status as the structurally dominant export, benefitting from the devaluation and contributing significantly to export revenues (NBE, 2024b; ECTA, 2025). Similarly, live trees, cut flowers and ornamental foliage (Category 4) demonstrates continuous competitive growth, with its RCA steadily increasing from 73.546 in 2018 to its highest level of 85.640 in 2024.
B. Commodity Volatility and Weakness
The Edible vegetables and certain roots and tubers (Category 2) sector shows significant volatility. While maintaining a high RCA (over 49) through 2022, its RCA experienced a dramatic collapse in 2024 to 13.304. This rapid loss of comparative advantage suggests a sector highly sensitive to external shocks, climate issues, or internal trade disruptions, which overwhelmed any gains from the exchange rate reform. The Oil seeds (Category 3) sector shows a competitive edge but remains highly volatile, declining slightly in 2024 to 20.833.
C. Post-Reform Reversal in Manufacturing
The most significant finding regarding the FX reform’s intended impact on non-traditional sectors is observed in Apparel. Both Articles of apparel, not knitted (Category 7) and Articles of apparel, knitted or crocheted (Category 8) experienced substantial, immediate competitive gains in 2024.
Category 7 (Non-Knitted Apparel) jumped from a low of 1.148 in 2023 to 4.108 in 2024.
Category 8 (Knitted Apparel) surged from 1.841 in 2023 to 4.611 in 2024.
A
Source: Figs. 2 is generated using Microsoft Copilot (Microsoft,
2025)
based on the data obtained from ITC, 2025
This sharp, synchronous increase, reversing a period of decline and stagnation, provides empirical evidence that the exchange rate liberalization succeeded in translating the real depreciation into immediate price competitiveness for Ethiopia’s nascent, job-intensive manufacturing sector. Similarly, Raw hides and skins (Category 6) stabilized its RCA at 11.323 in 2024, reversing a five-year declining trend, indicating a positive short-term effect on semi-processed goods.
Conversely, Footwear (Category 9) and Electrical machinery (Category 10) RCAs remain negligible (0.270 and 0.022, respectively). This suggests that for highly complex or technologically intensive sectors, the exchange rate correction is entirely insufficient to create a competitive advantage, reinforcing the notion that deeper structural constraints prevail (African Export Competitiveness Report, 2024).
4.3 HHI Analysis
The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for Ethiopia's exports, calculated based on the annual market shares of the top ten export categories over the 2018–2024 period, reveals a market structure characterized by consistent and high concentration, punctuated by extreme volatility driven by primary commodity performance.
The HHI calculation below confirms that for the majority of the period under review, Ethiopia's export base exceeded the threshold of 1,800, classifying it as Highly Concentrated. The HHI calculation uses the share of each of the ten categories in the annual Total Ethiopia Exports.
Table 2
Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for Ethiopia’s Export Concentration, 2018–2024
Year | Total Exports (USD '000) | HHI Value (×10,000) | Concentration Level |
|---|
2018 | 2,671,813 | 2033 | Highly Concentrated |
2019 | 2,678,468 | 1770 | Moderately Concentrated |
2020 | 2,526,221 | 1873 | Highly Concentrated |
2021 | 3,057,629 | 2520 | Highly Concentrated |
2022 | 3,083,778 | 3129 | Highly Concentrated (Peak) |
2023 | 2,857,941 | 2223 | Highly Concentrated |
2024 | 3,418,175 | 2306 | Highly Concentrated |
| Note. HHI ≥ 1,800 indicates high concentration. Coffee exports drive concentration trends, peaking in 2022. |
1.Peak Concentration (2022): The HHI peaked dramatically at 3129 in 2022, signifying extreme reliance on the largest sector. This peak coincided with the record high RCA for Coffee (179.221) 1 and underscores the inherent instability in an export portfolio where structural growth in the dominant product, while positive for revenue, amplifies concentration risk.
2.Structural Driver: Coffee Dominance: Throughout the period, the Coffee (HS 09) category consistently accounts for the largest component of the HHI. Its share of total exports reached a high of 49.4% in 2022, confirming that the trend in concentration is almost singularly dictated by the success or volatility of this one commodity.
3.Pre-Reform Trend (2018–2023): The general upward trend in HHI from 2019 (1770) to 2022 (3129) was primarily driven by the exponential growth of Coffee's export share, complemented by the collapse of market share in secondary sectors like Edible Vegetables (HS 07), whose share plummeted from 20.7% in 2018 to 17.5% in 2023 1, accelerating the concentration towards the primary commodity.
4.Post-Reform Outcome (2024): The HHI settled at 2306 in 2024, slightly higher than the pre-reform year of 2023 (2223). This critical result indicates that the exchange rate liberalization did not immediately translate into meaningful structural diversification among these key traditional and modern export categories. Although the FX reform boosted aggregate revenue, the distribution of market share remained highly concentrated. This suggests that the generalized competitive boost provided by the devaluation was either absorbed by the dominant commodity sector or insufficient to immediately lift the competitive manufacturing sectors into a position of scale that could reduce Coffee’s market share.
A
Source: Figs. 3 is generated using Microsoft Copilot (Microsoft,
2025)
based on the data obtained from ITC, 2025
The disproportionate growth of gold and the continued high RCA values of traditional cash crops (Coffee and Live Trees) relative to the manufacturing base imply a short-term increase in export concentration. While the sharp RCA gains in apparel suggest a positive development, the overall magnitude of the commodity boom m eans the export basket is temporarily less diversified (African Export Competitiveness Report, 2024). The policy success of price correction has yielded immediate, largest returns in sectors with existing capacity (commodities), potentially delaying the crucial structural shift toward higher value-added manufacturing.
4.4 Formalization Bias
High-frequency reports attribute the aggregate 117% export surge largely to gold exports, which grew by an unprecedented 735.2% (NBE, 2024b; MoTRI, 2025; Addis Fortune, 2024). This is overwhelmingly a result of formalization bias: the exchange rate convergence made it economically irrational to smuggle gold, successfully channeling previously illicit output into formal banking reserves (Ministry of Mines, 2025). This massive, one-time flow provided stabilization relief but did not structurally alter the country's productive capacity.
4.5 The RCA-Value Paradox in Manufacturing
The HHI data's failure to drop significantly in 2024 is explained by the RCA-Value Paradox: while the RCA increased substantially due to improved price competitiveness, the absolute export value for both knitted apparel ('61) and non-knitted apparel ('62) declined by 14% and 5%, respectively, between 2023 and 2024. This indicates that the monetary correction provided by the FX reform is insufficient to overcome deep-seated non-price barriers. Manufacturers are still constrained by structural friction such as high logistics costs, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and supply chain disruptions which prevent them from translating their newfound price advantage into higher export volumes (Capital Ethiopia, 2025).
The detailed RCA analysis is contextualized by the massive growth figures, particularly the gold exports (not listed in the top 10 categories above, but a primary contributor to the aggregate surge). Gold exports, benefiting immensely from the exchange rate convergence, surged by 735.2 percent year-on-year (NBE, 2024b; Addis Fortune, 2024). Official reports confirm that this performance is overwhelmingly driven by the formalization of trade redirecting output from previously illicit artisanal trade (which accounted for 95% of production) into official channels (Ministry of Mines, 2025). This massive, one-time stock adjustment means that the aggregate export success is heavily reliant on a formalization bias rather than organic, structural capacity expansion (Ministry of Mines, 2025).
4.6 Discussion: Structural Constraints
The weak absolute growth (0.7% for textiles in QIV 2023/24) (NBE, 2024b) and the negligible RCA of complex goods (Footwear, Machinery) confirm that the FX reform is being overwhelmed by non-price structural constraints:
Logistics and Regulatory Friction: High logistics costs, ranked among the highest in SSA, and pervasive bureaucratic inefficiencies resulting from low regulatory quality continue to impose a significant cost penalty on exporters (Capital Ethiopia, 2025; World Bank, 2014).
Lack of Demand Sophistication: The critically low AECI score of 12.06 for domestic demand sophistication means the internal market exerts insufficient pressure on local producers to innovate and achieve the quality standards necessary for global competitiveness (African Export Competitiveness Report, 2024).
6. Conclusion
The 2024 FX liberalization, a central policy effort of the HGER 2.0, successfully achieved stabilization and price correction, rapidly closing the parallel market gap and unlocking substantial aggregate export revenue (MoTRI, 2025). The detailed RCA analysis confirms that the exchange rate devaluation immediately translated into enhanced price competitiveness for some manufacturing segments, notably apparel. However, this success is structurally fragile, dominated by commodity formalization and prone to the risk of Dutch Disease (IMF, 2024a). For Ethiopia to realize its goal of sustained, diversified, export-led growth, the policy focus must decisively shift from monetary correction to mitigating structural risks and addressing non-price barriers, particularly logistics and regulatory friction.
7. Policy Recommendations
To solidify the gains from FX stabilization and pivot toward long-term structural transformation, the following policy actions are recommended:
6.1 Macroeconomic and Risk Mitigation
1.Aggressive Sterilization: The NBE must rigorously sterilize the excess domestic liquidity generated by the gold export windfall. This proactive measure is essential to prevent inflationary pressures and curb any premature real appreciation of the Birr that would undermine the price competitiveness of the manufacturing and industrial sectors (IMF, 2024a).
2.Market Deepening: Foster the rapid growth of the interbank FX market and authorize non-bank foreign exchange bureaus to deepen market transparency and maintain a competitive, market-determined rate, preventing the recurrence of parallel market incentives (NBE, 2024).
6.2 Structural and Sectoral Policy
1.Targeted Non-Price Incentives: Implement policy mechanisms that prioritize the use of retained FX proceeds (the 50% retention account) for specific high-priority manufacturing firms, directing funds toward the import of technology and capital goods (NBE, n.d.).
2.Systemic Logistics Corridor Reform: Direct intensive investment toward improving transport infrastructure and regulatory streamlining to reduce the operational costs that remain among the highest in Sub-Saharan Africa. Logistical efficiency is now the primary non-price constraint (Capital Ethiopia, 2025).
3.Policy to Cultivate Domestic Demand: Implement public policies (e.g., higher industrial standards, targeted public procurement) that actively compel local firms to produce more complex, high-quality goods. This is crucial for developing the skills and technological capacity needed for sustained international competitiveness (African Export Competitiveness Report, 2024).
The author reports no competing interests.