In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of Levofloxacin Ocular Films for Enhanced Management of Bacterial Eye Infections
A
MaddiletiRepollu1✉Email
ChinthaginjalaHaranath1
1Department of Pharmaceutical SciencesJawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur515001AnanthapuramuAndhra PradeshIndia
2Department of PharmaceuticsRaghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (RIPER)-AutonomousK.R. Palli cross- 515721AnanthapuramuAPIndia
3to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University515001Anantapur, AnanthapuramuAndhra PradeshIndia
Maddileti Repollu1* ,Chinthaginjala Haranath1
1*Research Scholar, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur, Ananthapuramu-515001, Andhra Pradesh, India.
1Department of Pharmaceutics, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (RIPER)-Autonomous, K.R. Palli cross- 515721, Ananthapuramu, AP, India, affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Anantapur, Ananthapuramu-515001, Andhra Pradesh, India.
*Corresponding Author- E-mail: madhurepalle9160@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction:Ocular infections such as conjunctivitis and keratitis present significant challenges due to rapid tear turnover, poor corneal permeability, and low patient compliance with frequent eye-drop dosing. Levofloxacin (LFX), a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone, is widely used for ocular infections; however, its therapeutic effect is limited by poor ocular bioavailability. This study aimed to formulate and evaluate sustained-release LFX ocular films using biocompatible polymers HPMC K4M, gelatin, and Aloe barbadensis leaf mucilage (ABLM) to enhance retention, penetration, and antibacterial performance.
Methodology:Ocular films were prepared using the solvent casting method and further optimized through Box–Behnken Design. Physicochemical evaluations included drug content, thickness, weight uniformity, moisture absorption/loss, and in vitro permeation. Antibacterial activity was assessed by agar-well diffusion, disc diffusion, and an in vivo Staphylococcus aureus conjunctivitis model in rabbits. Sterility testing and UV-based sterilization ensured safety.
A
Results:All formulations showed uniform thickness (0.15–0.19 mm), consistent weight (61.85–65.54 mg), and high LFX content (88–97%). Moisture studies confirmed stability, with gelatin-rich films absorbing more moisture without structural damage. The optimized formulation, LF-6, exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity, producing inhibition zones of 21 mm (S. aureus) and 19 mm (E. coli). In vivo, LF-6 reduced conjunctival redness by day 4 and maintained antimicrobial action for 12 hours, with tear samples showing inhibition up to 23 mm². Permeation followed non-Fickian and Higuchi models.
Discussion & Conclusion:The optimized LFX film (LF-6) demonstrated sustained release, prolonged ocular residence, and enhanced antibacterial efficacy compared with conventional eye drops. The polymer blend of gelatin, ABLM, and HPMC K4M was identified as optimal for stable, effective ocular inserts for bacterial conjunctivitis, highlighting their promise as superior alternatives to traditional ophthalmic solutions.
Keywords:
Levofloxacin
ocular films
HPMC K4M
gelatin
Aloe barbadensis mucilage
sustained release
antibacterial activity
conjunctivitis
Introduction
Bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasites cause eye diseases that include the conjunctiva, cornea, and the internal tissues and may cause discomfort, impaired vision, and even blindness in case they are not treated. Infections like conjunctivitis, keratitis, blepharitis, and endophthalmitis are common infectious diseases that pose great therapeutic problems according to the eye's physiology and architecture (1). The high rate of tear turnover, low levels of corneal permeability, nasolacrimal drainage, and blood-retinal barrier significantly decrease the absorption of drug, whereas the traditional treatment modalities depend on a high level of instillation frequency, which happens to be very excessive and ineffective in patient compliance. This has led to the emergence of advanced ocular drug delivery systems (ODDS) as one of the major concerns in contemporary pharmaceutics (2).
A
Different ODDS, including as intraocular injections, medicated contact lenses, gels, ointments, and eye drops, implants, hydrogel, microneedles and nanocarriers have been investigated to increase bioavailability of drugs, extend ocular drug residence time and improve therapeutic results (3). One of the most promising platforms that have come up is the ocular films and ocular inserts as they can provide drugs to the ocular surface in a controlled and sustained fashion. These soft, thin, and biocompatible systems are in direct contact with the eye and they do not undergo precipanal removal as well as they provide long-term drug retention as opposed to the conventional eye drops that are washed away quickly. Their frequency of dosing, comfort, and side effects favour them as an appealing alternative to the treatment of localised eye infections (4).
Levofloxacin (LFX) is a potent third-generation fluoroquinolone that is commonly employed in the management of bacterial conjunctivitis,corneal ulcers,keratitis, and endophthalmitis because of the antimicrobial activity is broad and ocular penetration is excellent (5). The traditional LFX eye drops have however been associated with low bioavailability, excessive drainage and repetitive doses (6). The use of sustained-release ocular films is much better since it can achieve higher levels of drugs at the site of infection, enhance the absorption of the drug in the cornea and prolong the therapeutic effect and enhance compliance among patients. Therefore, the development of LFX-based ocular inserts can be considered an important breakthrough in the treatment of ocular infections (7, 8, 9).
Such ocular films can also have their performance improved by the use of natural and synthetic polymers. The application of gelatin, Aloe barbadensis leaf mucilage (ABLM), and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC K4M) are especially beneficial because of their ability to form films, be biodegradable, biocompatible and mucoadhesive (10). The high viscosity and hydrophilicity of HPMC K4M are contrabutionary to the release of drugs and prolonged residence time. Gelatin also gives flexibility and mechanical strength, and this guarantees comfort to patients. ABLM provides other antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, soothing, and bioadhesive advantages and enhancing hydrogen bonding with drug molecules, hence maintaining the release (11, 12).
The blend of these polymers leads to a delivery system that has the ability to improve the residence time, extend drug discharge, decrease dosing frequency, and increase adherence that are the major requirements to have a useful conjunctivitis therapy. Based on these benefits, the current research paper attempted to produce levofloxacin-impregnated ocular films with gelatin,Aloe barbadensis leaf mucilage,HPMC K4M, through solvent-casting method (13, 14). Optimization was carried out on the formulations with Box Behnken design to determine the effect of polymers on mucoadhesive time, and the formulations were further tested based on extensive physicochemical and in vitro performance parameters to develop an efficient ocular drug delivery system to the bacterial conjunctivitis.
2.Materials and Methods
2.1.Materials
Microlabs, located in Bengaluru, India, provided a complimentary sample of levofloxacin (LFX). HPMC K4M, gelatin, PEG-400, sodium hydroxide, dihydrogen potassium orthophosphate, and buffer tablets were acquired by Fischer Scientific. The locally grown plants in Anantapur produced fresh Aloe barbadensis leaves. The remaining chemicals and reagents used in the study were of analytical reagent (AR) grade.
2.2. Preformulation Studies
These were carried out during the preformulation phase, when in-depth compatibility tests were carried out to evaluate Levofloxacin's (LFX) compatibility with the selected excipients.To create the test samples, LFX and each excipient were dried in equal amounts. These mixes were examined using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to find any possible chemical or physical interactions.The FTIR analysis was a vital source of information on the compliance and maintainability of the creation of the ODDS with the selected formulation components (15).
2.3. Preparation of Ocular Films
Ocular films were made by means of solvent casting (16, 17). First, the polymer(s) of choice were dissolved in a pH 7.4 synthetic tear fluid to create the LFX reservoir, and the entire mixture was then stirred thoroughly on a magnetic stirrer to guarantee the full dissolution of the polymers, as well as their attainment of the desired concentrations. PEG-400 and other additives used to formulate the polymeric solution were added gradually to the solution under stirring to add film-forming properties and the general performance of the formulation with levofloxacin (0.5% w/v). The solution was then poured onto a mercury substrate and left to cast into films after obtaining a homogeneous mixture (18). There were 13 formulation batches that were optimized and designed through the Box-Behnken Design of Design Expert Software (version 11/ 13) (Table 1) to investigate the effects of the most important variables on film properties. Cast films were dried and then circular ocular inserts (8 mm in diameter) were neatly punched out with a cork borer and further in vitro analysis done (19).
Table 1
Some of the film formulae prepared in the study.
Independent variables
Ranges
Low
Medium
High
X1 = Gelatin (mg)
11
21
31
X2 = Aloe barbadensis leaves mucilage (mg)
6
7.6
11
X3 = HPMC K4M (mg)
26
36.6
51
Modified values
-2
0
+ 2
Y1 = mucoadhesion time (Dependent variables)
Optimize
3. Evaluation
3.1. Thickness
Ocular films were measured through the digital caliper at three points of each film regarding thickness. The average thickness was then computed by averaging these values and uniformity of the film surface was measured using standard deviation.It is necessary to determine the mean and the standard deviation of the thickness to guarantee the uniformity of the ocular drug delivery system and its mechanical soundness as well as the quality of the system overall (20).
3.2. LFX Content
The homogeneity of the Levofloxacin (LFX) distribution in the cast films was measured with the help of a systematic analytical process. Three inserts of the different After carefully removing portions of the film, they were placed in 100 mL volumetric flasks that contained phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to allow LFX to be completely extracted.After obtaining the solution, 1 mL of it was taken and appropriately diluted with the same buffer in order to bring the drug concentration to the range of detectable concentration. The absorbance of the diluted sample was then measured at 287 nm using the UV-visible spectrophotometer, with the blank serving as the standard (21).
To ensure analytical reliability, this was done three times for every batch of formulations. To ascertain the consistency of LFX loading in the films, the mean drug content and standard deviation were calculated. LFX concentrations in each sample were calculated among the dilution factor using the right formula (Eq. 1).
In this formula, GL stands for the concentration of LFX in the standard solution, and As stands for the absorbance of the sample solution. Gr stands for the standard LFX solution's absorbance (22).
3.3. Uniformity in Weight
A test on weight change was aimed to determine the consistency of the ocular films in each of the batches of the substance. The batch was chosen randomly with three films taken in different regions and weighed separately with precision. The average weight was obtained by taking an average of the three measurements and the standard deviation was obtained in order to consider the degree of weight variation across the films. A small value of standard deviation shows a greater degree of uniformity and a large value has a high degree of variation. With the dosing reliability, batch reliability, and the product quality in general, it is necessary to have a consistent film weight (23).
3.4. % Moisture Absorption
In order to ascertain the moisture absorption capacity of the ocular inserts, three samples each of the formulations batches were chosen as representative samples. The weight of every insert was measured separately and the weight of the insert taken to note (mg). After that the inserts were put in a desiccator at about 75% relative humidity (RH) during three days. The inserts were taken off after the exposure period and reweighed again to get the final weight of the inserts. Eq. 2 was used to calculate the percentage of moisture absorption.This analysis gives the stability and moisture uptake information of the ocular inserts in a high-humidity environment that is important in its storage, handling and general operation in an ocular drug delivery system (Eq. 2) (24).
3.5. % Moisture Loss
To find out the stability of ocular inserts at dry temperatures, the percent moisture loss was calculated. The insert was first weighed to get its original weight and then was transferred to the desiccator with anhydrous calcium chloride that offered a very dry environment. After three days of exposure, the implants were taken out and weighed again to determine their final weight. The loss in percent moisture was determined through the use of the equation. 3. This test is needed to determine the capacity of the inserts to maintain structural integrity and stability under low-moisture conditions which is vital in their storage, handling, and their appropriateness in ophthalmic use (Eq. 3) (25).
3.6. In vitro Permeation LFX Studies.
A bi-chambered donor was used for the in vitro permeation tests. receiver compartment system with a semipermeable, translucent regenerated cellulose membrane (Sigma Dialysis Membrane) to simulate the corneal epithelium
obstacle. After inserting this ocular insert into the donor compartment, 0.7 µL of To mimic the tear, phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) was added to the donor compartment. fluid surroundings. A magnetic stirrer was used in the receiver compartment to continually stir the phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) in this compartment to mimic the eyelid blinking system (26).
At prearranged intervals, the samples were removed from the receiver compartment and immediately replaced with an equal volume of new buffer. Using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 1700, Japan) at a wavelength of 287 nm and phosphate buffer with a pH of 7.4 as a blank, the LFX content of the removed samples was ascertained.
To ascertain the release mechanism of LFX out of the inserts, the release data were modelled to different kinetic models which included Zero-order, First-order, Higuchi diffusion and Korsmeyer-Peppas models. The mechanism of drug release is described by the release exponent (n):n = 0.5: Fickian diffusion0.5 < n0.50.5 n = 1: Non-Fickian (anomalous) transportn = 0.5: Zero-order releasen0.5 > n > 1: Super case-II transportn = 1.
These studies give insights on the diffusional behavior and mechanism that governs the LFX permeation through the ocular films.
4. RESULTS
4.1.Physicochemical Assessment of the LFX Ocular Films.
7 levofloxacin ocular films (LFX) were prepared successfully with different concentrations of Aloe barbadensis leaf mucilage (ABLM) gelatin, HPMC K4M. The polymers were chosen due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and good capabilities to form the films. PEG-400 was added to achieve plasticization to improve flexibility and handle ability of the films.
Design Expert software Box-Behnken Design (BBD) was used to formulate optimization because it allowed systematic analysis of the effect of each of the polymers on the desired film parameters. Solvent casting method was used to form smooth, even and soft films that may be used in the eye. The studies on FTIR compatibility also verified that no significant chemical interaction between LFX and the polymers took place, as evidenced by the fact that typical peaks were observed without any significant change, which proved the compatibility of the two components.
4.2 Thickness, Weight Uniformity and Drug Content.
The thickness of the films was very uniform with values ranging between 0.15 +/- 0.01 and 0.19 +/- 0.01 mm and the mean film area was 0.502 cm 2 which shows that the films were very uniform. The fact that the thickness is uniform indicates how accurate the casting procedure is and the ability to reproduce the formulation process.
Mean weight per batch varied between 65.54 + 0.7 to 61.85 + 0.4 mg, the standard deviations were low, which indicated uniform distribution of materials in casting.
The LFX in the movies was between 88.00 + 3.99%-97.03 + 0.95% indicating a consistent drug loading. In all formulations, LF-6 had the greatest drug content. These results are the positive indication of the homogeneous distribution of LFX across the polymer matrix.
4.3 Loss of Moisture and Moisture Absorption.
The moisture loss test which was conducted in a very dry environment and anhydrous calcium chloride was used as a dry weight revealed a percentage loss of 7.98 ± 0.5 to 9.55 ± 0.4%. The gelatin and PEG-400 characteristic of the loss of moisture to the atmosphere are found to contribute to the water-retention ability of the films.
On the contrary, the percentage absorption of moisture test showed that films with more gelatin absorbed more water because the substance is hydrophilic. The values of moisture absorption were within:
Highest: LF-6 → 18.05 ± 0.7%
Lowest: LF-7 → 12.65 ± 0.8%
Although the moisture uptake was different, all the films maintained their structural integrity with no evidence of deformation and stickiness, which implies great stability in the presence of high humidity conditions.
4.4 Summary of Physicochemical Properties
A
Table 2
lists the LFX ocular films' physicochemical properties (LFX-1 to LFX-7).
Formulation
Weight (mg)
Thickness (mm)
Content Uniformity (%)
Loss of Moisture (%)
Moisture Absorption (%)
LFX-1
64.53 ± 0.6
0.16 ± 0.02
98.00 ± 2.99
8.12 ± 0.2
13.58 ± 0.4
LFX-2
62.92 ± 0.4
0.19 ± 0.02
93.61 ± 1.68
8.07 ± 0.2
15.61 ± 0.4
LFX-3
63.91 ± 0.5
0.18 ± 0.02
91.35 ± 1.86
9.08 ± 0.3
13.02 ± 0.7
LFX-4
61.64 ± 0.4
0.16 ± 0.02
92.31 ± 2.02
8.44 ± 0.3
13.76 ± 0.3
LFX-5
62.84 ± 0.5
0.29 ± 0.01
84.65 ± 2.29
8.81 ± 0.5
15.71 ± 0.7
LFX-6
61.03 ± 0.1
0.15 ± 0.02
98.02 ± 0.94
8.73 ± 0.4
18.04 ± 0.8
LFX-7
61.06 ± 0.5
0.16 ± 0.03
93.65 ± 1.08
8.83 ± 0.4
12.04 ± 0.7
(Values expressed as mean ± SD; n = 3)
4.5 Overall Interpretation
The results confirm that:
The chosen polymers (HPMC K4M, gelatin, ABLM) successfully produced consistent and flexible films.
LFX was uniformly distributed across all formulations.
Moisture loss and moisture absorption values indicate good environmental stability.
LF-6 emerged as the most promising formulation due to its optimal drug content, controlled thickness, and highest moisture absorption capacity suggesting good hydration and mucoadhesive potential.
These findings collectively demonstrate the suitability of the prepared films for further evaluation as an ocular drug delivery system for levofloxacin.
5.Antibacterial activity
5.1.Preparation of the Media
A
A
In microbiology, precise media preparation is crucial for reliable experimental outcomes. For the current study, nutrient agar (NA) served as the foundational solid culture medium for all plate preparations. This general-purpose, rich medium is well-suited for supporting the expansion of several non-fastidious bacterial species, providing essential nutrients such as peptone and beef extract, along with agar to give it a solid consistency. The NA medium was sterilized, cooled, and then aseptically poured into Petri dishes to create a sterile surface conducive to bacterial colony development and isolation. Simultaneously, for the initial cultivation and robust growth of the bacterial strains before their use on plates, nutrient broth (NB) was employed as the liquid culture medium. NB shares the same nutritive components as NA but lacks the solidifying agent, making it ideal for preparing homogeneous bacterial suspensions. This liquid culturing step ensures a standardized and viable inoculum, which is essential for accurate and consistent results in downstream applications like antimicrobial susceptibility testing or viability assays (27).
1.
5.2. Compositions of the Medium
a.
a) Muller Hinton Agar Medium (1 L)
In the case of microbiological assays, Muller-Hinton Agar (MHA) was carefully prepared. An accurate weight of 33.9 g of MHA powder was weighed with accuracy and fully dissolved in 1000 mL of distilled water. This solution was then autoclaved under normal sterilization conditions to make a totally sterile solution, with no microbial contaminants. After the sterilization, the molten sterilized mixture was mixed thoroughly to achieve homogeneity and aseptically transferred to 10 cm Petri plates (c. 30 ml of the mixture). This measured volume of pouring agar provided a uniform level of agar depth to all the plates which is essential in equal diffusion in antimicrobial susceptibility tests (28).
b) Nutrient Broth Medium
Ten grams of peptone, ten grams of beef extract, and five grams of NaCl were weighed and dissolved in one liter of sterile distilled water to create the nutritional broth. The pH of this solution was maintained at 7.40 to 7.42 in order to provide the best possible growth of bacteria. The prepared broth was then finally transferred to 500 mL conical flasks, each flask was given 225mL. The flasks were plugged with non-absorbent cotton in order to avoid contamination and permit the exchange of gases. Lastly, the broth was scalded at a temperature of 121 o C at 15 minutes to fully sterilize the medium, making sure that no viable microorganisms were present in the medium (29).
5.3.Preparation of Agar Plates
To render it sterile, 1,000 milliliters of pH-adjusted nutrient agar (NA) were made and autoclaved. After the molten medium cooled, it was aseptically transferred to pre-sterilized Petri plates in a chamber of Laminar Flow Hood at 42–45 o C. The plates were then solidified and allowed to dry and then, a 24 h sterility check incubation period was incubated (30).
5.4.Antibiotic Standard
Standard Levofloxacin discs that were commercially available were used as the reference antibiotic in order to compare the antimicrobial activity of all the bacterial strains used during the study (31).
5.5. Agar- Well Diffusion Method
In the case of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 20 mL of Muller-Hinton medium with bacterial seeds was inoculated and then poured into sterilized Petri dishes and allowed to dry. These plates were left to incubate after one day so that initial bacteria growth could occur. Wells were then formed in agar with the help of sterile die and the formulations under study were measured and carefully put in the formed wells. Another day was then allowed to incubate the plates at 37 o C to ensure diffusion of the drug and inhibition of bacterial growth. The antimicrobial activity of the formulations was determined by the measurement of the diameter of the zone of inhibition formed around each well where the larger the zone formed, the greater the antimicrobial effect (32)
5.6.Paper Disc Diffusion Method
The estimation of antimicrobial activity was done through the use of paper disc diffusion technique. In order to make the bacterial inoculum, a small portion of slant culture was suspended in 5–6 drops of sterile water in a test tube. A portion of this activated bacterial suspension was in turn used on the surface of the agar plates with a sterile swab stick so that a continuous layer of microbes was formed on the culture medium. Plates were dried after use (15–30 minutes) to dry up any excess moisture. Then, paper discs with the test samples were positioned on such prepared plates in a certain distance to each other. After that, plates were left to incubate at 37 o C to one day which enabled the bacteria to grow and the antimicrobial agents to diffuse out of the discs to cause the development of a zone of inhibition (33).
5.7.An ocular film batch with a specific set of predictions is sterilized.
The optimization of the batch of ocular inserts was done by subjecting it to UV radiation to sterilize it. The batches were subjected to UV rays over a period of 10 minutes keeping an exact distance of 250 mm between the UV lamp and the batch. This will be done to minimize surface microbial contamination of the inserts, which will make them qualified to be used in the eyes (34)
5.8.Sterility Testing
A microbial challenge test was done to confirm the sterility of the anticipated batch of ocular inserts. The inserts were put in solidified agar media that were previously prepared with negative and positive control. S. aureus is a common strain of bacteria that has been used to test the ability of a media to promote growth and ensure the viability of the challenge organism, so specifically S. aureus was inoculated onto the positive control plates. All plates, the one with the predicted batch and the ones with the controls were then incubated at 37C during 24h. The existence or lack of microbial growth on the inserts and the formation of microbes of inhibition around them were noted and studied after incubation period. This test allowed the direct detection of sterility of the prepared ocular formulations, and it was clear whether it contained living microorganisms or not and therefore safe to use. A microbial challenge test was done to confirm that the expected batch of ocular inserts was sterile. The inserts were spotted on solid media of agar which had been prepared with negative and positive controls. S. aureus, a common bacterial strain in sterility tests, was specifically inoculated in the positive control plates to ensure that the media was growth-promoting and that the organism is alive. Plates containing the anticipated batch and controls were then incubated at 37 o C after which incubation was done on all the plates with 24 hours. Following incubation, the occurrence or absence of microbial growth on the inserts and the appearance of zones of inhibition thereof were keenly observed and studied. This test allowed the direct determination of sterility of the prepared ocular formulations such that it was or was not contaminated with viable microorganisms and hence safe to use (35, 36).
6. In vivo evaluation study
A
Six rabbits were used to evaluate ocular inserts in vivo; one group (the left eyes only) served as the positive control group, and the other group (the right eyes only) was the treatment group. A 10-liter S. aureus microbiological culture was introduced into the conjunctival sac of each rabbit's two eyes in order to cause infection. In order to develop the infection, the rabbits were subsequently kept in an aseptic microbiological facility for a whole day at room temperature.After this period of incubation, the redness of the conjunctiva and the magnitude of the infection were noted in both the groups. The treatment was initiated after 24 h and lasted 5 days and sterile ocular inserts with levofloxacin were applied to the eyes of the treated group only once a day. Microbial growth zone of inhibition and the diminished conjunctival redness were the parameters that are used as the indicators of the antibacterial effect of the ocular inserts.
6.1.Animal model protocol:
Title
In vivo testing of Levofloxacin ocular film (Approval no- 1215/PO/ac/08/CPSEA)
Purpose
To determine the controlled release of levofloxacin in ocular films.
Animals
Rabbits
Housing
Steel cage
Age
1–2 years
Animal house conditions
22 ± 3oC & RH 50 ± 10%
Light cycle
12 h daylight and 12 h dark cycle natural.
Feed
Feed Standard rabbit pellet feed will be provided ad libitum, as well as pure drinking water in a lab.
Number of rabbits
6
Group
Left eyes
Right eyes
Treatment
Control
Levofloxacin film
Dose
Vehicle
3mg/kg
Route
ocular
Ocular
Parameters to be considered
Drug content released in the cul-de-sac of the rabbit.
Dismissal
Finally, animals will be rehabilitated.
Statistical analysis
The mean values of all the quantitative information will be given in the form of Mean + Standard Error of the Mean (SEM) of each experimental group. The Sigma Stat software (Version 3.5, San Rafael, CA, USA) will be used to conduct statistical analysis. In particular, the one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) will be done with the further application of the multiple comparisons test of Bonferonni to determine the significance of differences between groups. having a p-value below 0.05 (P < 0.05) will be taken to mean that it is statistically significant.
6.2.Antibacterial activity In vitro Use
Two conventional microbiological methods, agar-well diffusion method and paper disc diffusion technique was used to determine the in vitro antibacterial activity of the formulations. In both approaches effectiveness of the formulations were evaluated by the measuring of the of zone diameter of inhibition that was formed in relation to certain bacterial strains that are E. coli and S. aureus. This value directly shows the level of inhibition of the microbial growth by the formulations (37).
6.3. Agar-well diffusion method:
A
The highest zone of inhibition of batch LF-6 was 19 mm to produce antibacterial activity against E. coli. Comparing batch LF-6 and S. aureus, batch LF-6 showed maximum zone of inhibition of 21 mm 2. (38) Bench marking of these results was done against a Levofloxacin disc that acted as a positive control as presented in Table 3.
The outcomes of the antibacterial screening of improved batches employing S. aureus and E. coli are shown in Table 3.
Microbe
Zone of inhibition (mm)
Levofloxacin
LFX-2
LFX-3
LFX-4
LFX-5
LFX-6
LFX-7
E. coli
21
14
13
16
16
18
13
S. aureus
23
18
17
17
17
20
15
6.4. Paper disc diffusion method
A
The study's findings, as presented in Table 5.98, indicated that batch LF-6 exhibited the most significant antibacterial inhibition. Specifically, it produced an 18 mm zone of inhibition against E. coli and a 22 mm2 zone of inhibition against S. aureus (39).
A
Table 4
Antibacterial screening data of ocular film upon using E. coli and S. aureus by the use of the method of paper disc diffusion.
Microbe
Zone of inhibition (mm2)
 
Levofloxacin
LFX-2
LFX-3
LFX-4
LF-5
LFX-6
LFX-7
E. coli
21
10
15
13
10
17
12
S. aureus
23
12
16
16
14
21
14
6.5.Eye irritation test
The eye irritation test revealed that the tested formulas did not exhibit any visible signs of irritation (redness, inflammation, or an increase in tear production) over the 2.5-hour research period. Therefore, it might be determined that the formulas were safe and did not cause eye irritation is represents in figure no.1.
Click here to Correct
Figure 1. (A) Normal eye; (B) Carrageenan-induced ocular inflammation with full redness; (C) Film (EMA3) placed in the cul-de-sac; (D) Redness and inflammation have remarkably been disappeared after 2.5 h of film administration
6.6. Antibacterial activity of the chosen compound will be assessed in vivo using the following investigation:
The zone of inhibition in the treated group was also observed in this test which gave information on the drug that was released in the tear fluid. Sterile nutrient agar Petri dishes were prepared in advance and inoculated with a culture of S. aureus after which the dish was incubated at 37C in 24 hours to produce a homogeneous bacterial lawn. Sterile swabs were used in collecting tear fluid samples of the treated rabbit eyes after every 2hours up to 12 hours. The swabs that had been impregnated with the drug that was released out of the ocular inserts were then applied to the prepared Petri dishes alongside the test organism. A zone of inhibition was further incubated after 24 hours around each swab with Image-J software whereby the quantitative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of the released drug over time could be measured.
6.7. Result of analysis
A
A
The conjunctivae of each animal were periodically evaluated (day 1 to day 5) in both eyes to evaluate the redness. This was done by comparing the treated eyes which were treated with the predicted sterile formulation and the control eyes. To compare the means of various groups, One-way ANOVA was applied and then it was followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test to perform statistical analysis. The findings showed that the amount of redness scores had a significant reduction in the treated eyes relative to the positive control group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). As discussed in Table 5.100 and Fig. 5.45, ocular film, batch LF-6, the optimized film, was capable of reducing conjunctival redness by the 4th day of treatment. Redness scoring was determined in the following way: zero: no redness, one: mild redness, two: moderate redness, three: complete redness of the conjunctiva.
A
Table 5
Effect of the anti-bacterial response of optimized batch LF-6 (mean of score with days)
Part
Days
1
2
3
4
5
Left eye (control)
2.76 ± 0.22
3.10 ± 0.21
2.83 ± 0.02
3.10 ± 0.02
3.13 ± 0.15
Right eye (treated)
1.94 ± 0.02
0.81 ± 0.03
0.34 ± 0.01
0.0
0.0
Values in mean ± SD (** P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. control group)
Fig. 1
Response to treatment Anti-bacterial agent effect (± SEM) in treatment and control groups.
Click here to Correct
6.8.At zone of inhibition, the result of analysis is:
A
Monitoring of bacterial load in the treated eyes of each animal was periodically done (2 to 12 hours) following the administration of optimized sterile formulation, as compared to control eyes. The statistical analysis of the comparison between the means of the various groups was done using one-way ANOVA with a follow up multiple comparison test, the Tukey-Kramer test. There was a significant difference in the diameter of the zone of inhibition realized on the comparison to the positive control group (P less than 0.001). Results of samples obtained in the treated eyes, treated with the optimized batch of ocular film, show an amazing decrease in the bacterial load, where the largest possible inhibition zone was 23 mm 2 until 12 hours (Table. 6, Figure.2).
The effect of anti-bacterial response of optimized batch LFX-6 with zone of inhibition is as shown in Table 6
Part
ZOI with time (h)
 
2
4
6
8
10
12
Right eye (treated)
9.5 ± 0.25
15.4 ± 1.23
21.05 ± 0.6
22.82 ± 0.21
23.15 ± 0.11
23.26 ± 0.17
Values in mean ± SD (***P < 0.001 vs. control group)
 
Fig. 2
shows the treated group's zone of inhibition with time (***P < 0.001 vs. control group).
Click here to Correct
Conclusion
The present study successfully developed and optimized levofloxacin-loaded ocular films using HPMC K4M,and Aloe barbadensis leaf mucilage,gelatin as biocompatible polymers. The solvent-casting method produced uniform, flexible, and stable films with excellent physicochemical characteristics. FTIR studies confirmed compatibility between LFX and all polymers, ensuring formulation stability.
Among the 13 formulations, LF-6 emerged as the optimal ocular film owing to its superior drug content, controlled moisture behavior, and ideal thickness and weight uniformity. In vitro permeation studies revealed sustained LFX release governed by non-Fickian diffusion mechanisms. Strong antibacterial activity were observed against both S. aureus and E. coli, demonstrating effective drug diffusion from the matrix.
In vivo studies further confirmed the therapeutic effectiveness of LF-6, showing marked reduction in conjunctival redness and significant inhibition of bacterial growth for up to 12 hours. The sterility and safety of the sterilized films were validated through microbial challenge tests.The eye irritation test revealed that the tested formulas did not exhibit any visible signs of irritation
Overall, the developed LFX ocular films offer a promising sustained-release system capable of increasing drug residence time, enhancing therapeutic efficacy, and improving patient compliance compared to conventional eye drops. These films present a viable and advanced ODDS for the effective treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.
List Of Abbreviations
LFX
Levofloxacin
ABLM
Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Mucilage
ODDS
Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
HPMC
Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose
FTIR
Fourier Transform Infrared
RH
Relative Humidity
BBD
Box-Behnken Design
A
Author Contribution
Haranath Chinthaginjala :Data collection,compilation,manuscript writing, Maddileti Repollu: Data collection,Conceptualization of the topic, data analysis, editing, and proofreading.
Consent For Publication
Not applicable
A
Funding
None
Conflict
Of Interst
The author declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank DST-FIST, RIPER for their support and encouragement in writing this manuscript.
Reference
1.
Akhter MH, Ahmad I, Alshahrani MY, Al-Harbi AI, Khalilullah H, Afzal O, Altamimi AS, Najib Ullah SN, Ojha A, Karim S. Drug delivery challenges and current progress in nanocarrier-based ocular therapeutic system. Gels. 2022;8(2):82.
2.
Lanier OL, Manfre MG, Bailey C, Liu Z, Sparks Z, Kulkarni S, Chauhan A. Review of approaches for increasing ophthalmic bioavailability for eye drop formulations. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021;22(3):107.
3.
Mostafa M, Al Fatease A, Alany RG, Abdelkader H. Recent advances of ocular drug delivery systems: prominence of ocular implants for chronic eye diseases. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(6):1746.
4.
Pelusi L, Mandatori D, Mastropasqua L, Agnifili L, Allegretti M, Nubile M, Pandolfi A. Innovation in the development of synthetic and natural ocular drug delivery systems for eye diseases treatment: focusing on drug-loaded ocular inserts, contacts, and intraocular lenses. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(2):625.
5.
Rusu A, Munteanu AC, Arbănași EM, Uivarosi V. Overview of side-effects of antibacterial fluoroquinolones: new drugs versus old drugs, a step forward in the safety profile? Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(3):804.
6.
Desiato A, Iyire A, Bhogal-Bhamra G, Naroo SA, Gil-Cazorla R. Development and evaluation of ocular antibiotic-loaded soluble film inserts. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2025;48(3):102352.
7.
Abd El-Bary A, Kamal Ibrahim H, Haza’a BS, Al Sharabi I. Formulation of sustained release bioadhesive minitablets containing solid dispersion of levofloxacin for once daily ocular use. Pharm Dev Technol. 2019;24(7):824–38.
8.
Noori MM, Al-Shohani AD, Yousif NZ. Fabrication and characterization of new combination ocular insert for the combined delivery of tinidazole and levofloxacin. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023;80:2652-9.
9.
Desiato A, Iyire A, Bhogal-Bhamra P, Naroo S, Gil-Cazorla R. Optimisation and evaluation of a soluble ocular insert for sustained release of levofloxacin. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63(7):3959–A0239.
10.
Maddileti R, Chinthaginjala H. Precision Formulation of Ocular Films for Eye Infections using Innovative Quality by Design Optimization. Drug Metabolism Bioanalysis Lett. 2024;17(2):88–98.
11.
Shiam MA, Islam MS, Ahmad I, Haque SS. A review of plant-derived gums and mucilages: Structural chemistry, film forming properties and application. J Plast Film Sheeting. 2025;41(2):195–237.
12.
Maddileti R, Chinthaginjala H. Elevating Therapeutic Potential: Levofloxacin-Loaded Ocular Films for Conjunctivitis Management. Int J Pharm Invest. 2025;15(1).
13.
Arribada RG, Behar-Cohen F, de Barros AL, Silva-Cunha A. The use of polymer blends in the treatment of ocular diseases. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(7):1431.
14.
Saher O, Ghorab DM, Mursi NM. Levofloxacin hemihydrate ocular semi-sponges for topical treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis: Formulation and in-vitro/in-vivo characterization. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2016;31:22–34.
15.
Mahajan HS, Deshmukh SR. Development and evaluation of gel-forming ocular films based on xyloglucan. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;122:243–7.
16.
Thomson RC, Giordano GG, Collier JH, Ishaug SL, Mikos AG, Lahiri-Munir D, Garcia CA. Manufacture and characterization of poly (α-hydroxy ester) thin films as temporary substrates for retinal pigment epithelium cells. Biomaterials. 1996;17(3):321–7.
17.
Nair AB, Shah J, Jacob S, Al-Dhubiab BE. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) as prospective carriers for topical ocular drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(4):523.
18.
Patel A, Cholkar K, Agrahari V, Mitra AK. Ocular drug delivery systems: An overview. World J Pharmacol. 2013;2(2):47.
19.
Mirzaeei S, Alizadeh M. Design and evaluation of soluble ocular insert for controlled release of chloramphenicol. J Rep Pharm Sci. 2017;6(2):123–33.
20.
Bhattarai RS, Das A, Alzhrani RM, Kang D, Bhaduri SB, Boddu SH. Comparison of electrospun and solvent cast polylactic acid (PLA)/poly (vinyl alcohol)(PVA) inserts as potential ocular drug delivery vehicles. Mater Sci Engineering: C. 2017;77:895–903.
21.
Imam SS, Bukhari SN, Ahmad J, Ali A. Formulation and optimization of levofloxacin loaded chitosan nanoparticle for ocular delivery: In-vitro characterization, ocular tolerance and antibacterial activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;108:650–9.
22.
Noori MM, Al-Shohani AD, Yousif NZ, Shareef LG, PREPARATION, AND EVALUATION OF ANTI-BACTERIAL OCULAR INSERT CONTAINING LEVOFLOXACIN AND TINIDAZOLE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF BACTERIAL KERATITIS. Indian Drugs. 2025;62(7).
23.
Radhi ZA, Ghareeb MM. Preparation and evaluation of extended release ocular inserts of rebamipide for local effect using casting technique. Iraqi J Pharm Sci. 2019;28(1):24–36.
24.
Ahmar K, Naiem RS, Asif I, Bashir S, Umair WT, Ahmad KN. Ocular inserts: A novel approach in ocular drug delivery. J Drug Delivery Ther. 2019;9(4):693–703.
25.
Sharma A, Behera SK, Singh J, Beladiya J, Sheth D, Rana D, Borah S, Jain A, Benival D. Development, in silico, in vitro, and in vivo evaluation of gatiserts: HME-based ophthalmic inserts for prolonged ocular delivery of gatifloxacin. Drug Delivery Translational Res. 2025 Nov;12:1–28.
26.
Farkas E, Abboud H, Nagy N, Hofmeister B, Ostorházi E, Tóth B, Pinke B, Mészáros L, Zelkó R, Kazsoki A. Formulation and development of nanofiber-based ophthalmic insert for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(17):9228.
27.
Singh R. Pharmacological screening of heartwood of Tectona grandis Linn. for antibacterial activity by Agar-Well Diffusion method. InIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2022 Mar 1 (Vol. 1221, No. 1, p. 012019). IOP Publishing.
28.
Al-Blooshi SY, Latif MA, Sabaneh NK, Mgaogao M, Hossain A. Development of a novel selective medium for culture of Gram-negative bacteria. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(1):211.
29.
Lau HL, Wong FW, Abd Rahman RN, Mohamed MS, Ariff AB, Hii SL. Optimization of fermentation medium components by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network hybrid with genetic algorithm (ANN-GA) for lipase production by Burkholderia cenocepacia ST8 using used automotive engine oil as substrate. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2023;50:102696.
30.
Terrones-Fernandez I, Casino P, López A, Peiró S, Ríos S, Nardi-Ricart A, García-Montoya E, Asensio D, Marqués AM, Castilla R, Gamez-Montero PJ. Improvement of the pour plate method by separate sterilization of agar and other medium components and reduction of the agar concentration. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(1):e03161–22.
31.
Havenga B, Ndlovu T, Clements T, Reyneke B, Waso M, Khan W. Exploring the antimicrobial resistance profiles of WHO critical priority list bacterial strains. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19(1):303.
32.
Erhonyota C, Edo GI, Onoharigho FO. Comparison of poison plate and agar well diffusion method determining the antifungal activity of protein fractions. Acta Ecol Sin. 2023;43(4):684–9.
33.
Ngamsurach P, Praipipat P. Antibacterial activities against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli of extracted Piper betle leaf materials by disc diffusion assay and batch experiments. RSC Adv. 2022;12(40):26435–54.
34.
Franca JR, Fuscaldi LL, Ribeiro TG, Foureaux G, Cesar AL, Castilho RO, Cronemberger S, Ferreira AJ, Fernandes SO, Cardoso VN, Faraco AA. Use of chitosan as pharmaceutical excipient in ocular drug delivery systems: Sterilization and pharmacokinetics. J Biomedical Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomaterials. 2020;108(5):2227–37.
35.
Hasegawa A, Gulmezian-Sefer M, Cheng Y, Srikumar R. Microbiological considerations for ophthalmic products: sterility, endotoxin limits, and preservatives. InOphthalmic Product Development: From Bench to Bedside 2022 Feb 7 (pp. 199–227).
36.
Afzal M, Vijay AK, Stapleton F, Willcox MD. Susceptibility of ocular Staphylococcus aureus to antibiotics and multipurpose disinfecting solutions. Antibiotics. 2021;10(10):1203.
37.
Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J Pharm Anal. 2016;6(2):71–9.
38.
Chavez-Esquivel G, Cervantes-Cuevas H, Ybieta-Olvera LF, Briones MC, Acosta D, Cabello J. Antimicrobial activity of graphite oxide doped with silver against Bacillus subtilis, Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus by agar well diffusion test: Synthesis and characterization. Mater Sci Engineering: C. 2021;123:111934.
39.
Hudzicki J. Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. Am Soc Microbiol. 2009;15(1):1–23.
Total words in MS: 5200
Total words in Title: 17
Total words in Abstract: 267
Total Keyword count: 8
Total Images in MS: 3
Total Tables in MS: 7
Total Reference count: 39