“Machine Learning Validated Mix Design for RCA–Graphene Oxide Modified M40 Concrete for Rigid Pavement Applications”
A
VIPINKUMARYADAV1Email
PRINCEYADAV1Email
RAJATPANDEY1Email
1
A
M.Tech Student, Institute of Engineering & Technology226021LucknowUttar Pradesh
2Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering & Technology226021LucknowUttar Pradesh
3Department of Civil EngineeringGovernment Engineering CollegeKaimurUttar Pradesh
VIPIN KUMAR YADAV1, PRINCE YADAV2, RAJAT PANDEY3
1.M.Tech Student, Institute of Engineering & Technology, Lucknow, 226021, Uttar Pradesh,ervipin0419@gmail.com
2.Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering & Technology, Lucknow,226021, Uttar Pradesh,princevnit15@gmail.com
3.Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Government Engineering College, Kaimur, Uttar Pradesh, rajatgec.cedept@gmail.com
Abstract
This study investigates the mechanical and durability performance of M40-grade concrete incorporating 20% recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) and graphene oxide (GO) as a nano-modifier, supported by predictive machine learning (ML) modelling. Although RCA contributes to sustainability, its porous and weak interfacial microstructure typically reduces concrete performance. To overcome these drawbacks, GO was introduced at dosages ranging from 0–0.10%. Experimental testing revealed that GO significantly improved compressive, tensile, flexural strength, and durability characteristics up to an optimal dosage of 0.04–0.06%, where enhanced hydration, pore refinement and improved interfacial bonding were most evident. Beyond this range, strength and durability decreased due to GO agglomeration.
Advanced ML algorithms—XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost—were developed using the experimental dataset to validate trends and predict performance parameters. CatBoost achieved the highest accuracy across all mechanical and durability indicators with R² values between 0.955 and 0.979, demonstrating strong capability to model complex nonlinear interactions. The strong agreement between experimental and predicted results confirms the reliability of the dataset and highlights the potential of ML-assisted mix design for sustainable concrete. The findings demonstrate that controlled GO addition can effectively upgrade RCA concrete for structural and pavement applications while reducing dependency on natural aggregates.
Keywords:
Recycled coarse aggregate
Graphene oxide
Nano-modified concrete
Machine learning
XGBoost
LightGBM
CatBoost
Durability
Sustainable construction
M40 concrete
A
1. Introduction
A
Sustainable construction has become a global priority as the demand for infrastructure grows alongside escalating environmental concerns. Recycled coarse aggregate (RCA), obtained from construction and demolition waste, offers a practical and eco-efficient alternative to natural aggregates. Its use directly contributes to reduced landfill disposal, lower carbon emissions, and conservation of natural resources. However, despite these benefits, RCA possesses several limitations—high porosity, adhered mortar, microcracking, and weaker interfacial transition zones (ITZ)— which collectively diminish the mechanical strength and durability of concrete produced with higher RCA content. These drawbacks restrict the structural application of RCA concrete and highlight the need for performance- enhancing strategies.Recent advances in nanotechnology have introduced graphene oxide (GO) as a highly promising additive for cementitious systems. GO exhibits a two-dimensional nanosheet structure with abundant oxygen functional groups, enabling strong surface reactivity and improved bonding with calcium–silicate–hydrate (C–S–H) gel. Numerous studies report that GO promotes nucleation of hydration products, refines pore structure, enhances ITZ density, and improves mechanical performance even at very low dosages. This creates a unique opportunity to offset the weaknesses of RCA and produce high-performance sustainable concrete.
Parallel to material innovations, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful analytical tool capable of accurately predicting concrete properties based on limited experimental data. Modern ensemble algorithms such as XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost excel at modelling nonlinear and multi-variable relationships, making them well-suited for predicting RCA–GO concrete behaviour. ML not only strengthens result validation but also facilitates rapid mix optimisation, reducing dependence on extensive laboratory testing.
In this context, the present study explores the combined effect of GO modification and ML-based prediction on the performance of M40 concrete containing 20% RCA. The research aims to (i) investigate the mechanical and durability characteristics of RCA–GO concrete, (ii) identify the optimum GO dosage, and (iii) develop accurate ML
models to validate and forecast concrete performance. The novelty of this work lies in integrating nano-enhancement with data-driven modelling to establish a modern framework for designing sustainable, high-performance concrete mixtures.
2. Literature Review
The use of recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) has gained significant attention as the construction industry moves toward sustainability. Numerous studies between 2018 and 2025 consistently report that RCA exhibits higher porosity, adhered mortar, and microcracking compared to natural aggregates, which collectively weaken the mechanical performance of concrete. Researchers have observed that compressive strength typically decreases with increasing RCA replacement due to reduced aggregate stiffness and weaker interfacial transition zones (ITZ).
Despite these drawbacks, many authors highlight that the environmental and economic benefits of RCA justify its use in structural and pavement applications when its limitations are properly addressed through material modification.
Graphene oxide (GO) has emerged as one of the most effective nano-modifiers capable of improving the microstructure of cementitious composites. Studies conducted after 2019 demonstrate that GO enhances hydration kinetics, fills microvoids, and promotes the formation of dense C–S–H gel, resulting in significant improvement in mechanical properties. Researchers have reported increases in compressive and tensile strength in the range of 5– 20% at optimal dosages between 0.02% and 0.06% by weight of cement. Beyond the optimum range, several works note that GO tends to agglomerate, reducing its efficiency and adversely affecting workability and strength. Recent investigations also emphasize GO’s ability to refine pore structure, decrease capillary suction, and enhance resistance against chloride ingress and acid attack, making it a promising additive for durability enhancement.
The combined use of RCA and GO has gained momentum in recent research, as GO’s microstructural benefits can offset weaknesses inherent in recycled aggregates. Studies from 2021 onward demonstrate that GO improves the weak ITZ region of RCA concrete, resulting in better mechanical performance even at higher RCA replacement levels. Researchers have observed that GO strengthens the bonding between adhered mortar and the surrounding paste, which is typically the weakest region in RCA-based mixtures. Furthermore, GO-modified RCA concrete displays reduced water absorption and improved resistance to sulphuric and hydrochloric acid exposure, highlighting GO’s potential to restore the durability deficits associated with recycled aggregates.
Parallel to material advancements, machine learning (ML) has become an increasingly valuable tool for concrete property prediction. Between 2020 and 2025, ensemble algorithms such as XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost have demonstrated high prediction accuracy for compressive strength, tensile capacity, and durability parameters of conventional and recycled aggregate concrete. These models are particularly effective in capturing nonlinear interactions between mix constituents, curing conditions, and performance outcomes. Several researchers have incorporated ML in sustainable concrete studies to validate experimental results and to reduce laboratory workload by enabling rapid prediction of multi-parameter systems. CatBoost, in particular, has been repeatedly highlighted for its superior performance on small and structured experimental datasets, making it suitable for concrete mix design research.
Recent literature further emphasizes the value of combining nano-modification with ML-based prediction. Works published after 2023 show that ML-assisted approaches significantly improve the reliability of performance forecasting for nano-engineered concretes, allowing researchers to identify optimum nano-admixture dosages, assess parameter influence, and evaluate material stability under various environmental conditions. These studies indicate that integrating GO modification with ML modelling provides a comprehensive approach for analyzing mechanical and durability improvements in RCA concrete.
Despite notable advancements, the literature reveals two clear gaps. First, only limited research has examined the combined effect of 20% RCA with varying GO dosages under both mechanical and durability frameworks. Second, the integration of GO-enhanced RCA concrete with advanced ML validation—especially using CatBoost and ensemble averaging—remains scarce. These gaps highlight the need for a detailed experimental study supported by robust ML prediction to fully understand the performance potential of RCA–GO concrete for structural and rigid pavement applications.
3. Materials and Methodology
3.1 Materials
Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) of 43 grade was used as the primary binder for producing M40-grade concrete. The cement complied with the requirements of IS 8112 and exhibited consistent physical properties suitable for structural concrete. Natural river sand conforming to Zone II of IS 383 was used as fine aggregate. Coarse aggregate consisted of a combination of natural crushed stone (80%) and recycled coarse aggregate (20%). The RCA was sourced from demolished concrete waste, mechanically crushed, cleaned, and sieved to a nominal size of 20 mm.
Owing to adhered mortar and microcracks, RCA exhibited higher water absorption and lower density than natural aggregate; therefore, it was pre-soaked for 24 hours and used in saturated surface-dry condition to ensure uniformity during mixing.
Graphene oxide (GO) was used as a nano-modifier in powder form. It consisted of ultra-thin nanosheets with high surface area and abundant oxygen-functional groups, making it effective in enhancing cement hydration and improving interfacial transition zones. GO dosages of 0%, 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.06%, 0.08% and 0.10% by weight of cement were considered. A polycarboxylate ether–based superplasticizer was used to maintain workability, especially since RCA and GO tend to reduce slump. Potable water, free from impurities, was used for both mixing and curing.
3.2 Preparation and Conditioning of Recycled Aggregates
The RCA preparation followed a practical, industry-feasible process to ensure reproducibility. Demolished concrete blocks were crushed using a jaw crusher and manually cleaned to remove loose mortar. The aggregates were thoroughly washed to eliminate dust and fine contaminants before being graded through standard sieves. Since RCA typically absorbs more water than natural aggregates, the material was pre-soaked to achieve a saturated surface-dry (SSD) state, preventing undesired water extraction from the cement paste during mixing.
3.3 Dispersion of Graphene Oxide
Effective dispersion of GO is essential to avoid nanosheet agglomeration and ensure its uniform action within the concrete matrix. The required GO quantity was mixed with approximately 25% of the total mixing water and ultrasonicated for 30 minutes in pulse mode. This was followed by high-speed mechanical stirring for three minutes to fully exfoliate the GO sheets. The well-dispersed suspension was then added gradually during mixing to ensure homogeneous distribution throughout the cementitious system.
3.4 Mix Proportions and Experimental Variables
All concrete mixes were prepared with a constant water–cement ratio of 0.40, and the target characteristic compressive strength was 40 MPa. RCA content was fixed at 20% for all mixtures, while GO dosage varied systematically to identify the optimum nano-modifier level. The superplasticizer dosage was adjusted slightly for each mix to maintain a consistent slump range suitable for placing and compaction.
Fresh concrete was cast in 150 mm cube moulds for compressive strength, 100 × 200 mm cylinders for split tensile strength, and 100 × 100 × 500 mm beams for flexural strength. Specimens were compacted using a table vibrator, demoulded after 24 hours, and cured in water at 27 ± 2°C until testing ages of 7, 28, 56, and 90 days. Durability
tests, including water absorption, sorptivity, acid resistance, rapid chloride permeability (RCPT), and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), were performed following relevant IS and ASTM standards.
3.5 Machine Learning Workflow
A machine learning framework was developed to validate and predict the mechanical and durability behaviour of RCA–GO concrete. The experimental dataset consisted of input parameters such as RCA percentage, GO dosage, water–cement ratio, curing age, and slump, while output parameters included compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, elastic modulus, water absorption, sorptivity, RCPT, acid resistance, and UPV.Three gradient-boosting models—XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost—were selected due to their proven capability in modelling small, nonlinear experimental datasets. The data were split into training (80%) and testing (20%) subsets. Hyperparameters were optimized through randomized search, and model accuracy was evaluated using R², RMSE, and MAE. Ensemble averaging was applied to enhance robustness and minimize prediction variance. Feature importance analysis was carried out to identify the most influential parameters governing RCA–GO concrete performance.This hybrid framework enables both performance enhancement through nano-modification and data- driven prediction through machine learning.
4. Experimental Programs
The experimental programme was designed to evaluate the mechanical and durability performance of M40-grade concrete containing 20% recycled coarse aggregate and varying dosages of graphene oxide. A total of six concrete mixes were prepared, each with a fixed RCA content of 20% and GO dosages of 0%, 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.06%, 0.08%, and 0.10%. All mixes were proportioned using a constant water–cement ratio of 0.40 and produced under identical batching, mixing, and curing conditions to ensure comparability. The primary objective of the experimental programme was to identify the optimum GO dosage capable of compensating for the inherent weaknesses of RCA, while simultaneously generating a consistent dataset suitable for machine learning validation.
The mixing procedure followed a controlled and repeatable sequence to ensure uniform distribution of all constituents. Initially, cement, fine aggregate, natural aggregate, and saturated surface-dry RCA were dry-mixed to achieve a homogeneous base. The pre-dispersed GO suspension was then introduced gradually with a portion of the mixing water, followed by the remaining water containing the superplasticizer. The mixture was blended thoroughly to avoid GO agglomeration and to maintain a workable and cohesive mix. Slump measurements were taken immediately after mixing to monitor the influence of RCA and GO on workability.
Fresh concrete was placed into moulds in two layers and compacted using a table vibrator to eliminate air voids. For mechanical testing, cubes (150 × 150 × 150 mm), cylinders (100 × 200 mm), and beams (100 × 100 × 500 mm) were cast. Durability tests required separately prepared specimens of appropriate dimensions as per relevant standards. All specimens were demoulded after 24 hours and transferred to a curing tank maintained at 27 ± 2°C. Testing was carried out at curing ages of 7, 28, 56, and 90 days to capture both early-age and long-term performance characteristics.
Mechanical tests included compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, and static modulus of elasticity. Compressive strength tests were performed according to IS 516 and ASTM C39, while split tensile and flexural strength tests adhered to IS 5816 and IS 516 protocols, respectively. The modulus of elasticity was determined using the stress–strain response of cylinder specimens. Durability assessments focused on water absorption, sorptivity, acid resistance under sulphuric and hydrochloric acid exposure, rapid chloride penetration testing (RCPT), and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV). Each test was conducted in accordance with established IS and ASTM procedures to ensure reliability and reproducibility.
All experimental data were systematically recorded and organized into structured datasets for subsequent machine learning analysis. The performance of each mix was evaluated holistically by integrating mechanical, durability, and
microstructural responses, thereby enabling a comprehensive understanding of the influence of GO on RCA- modified concrete. The resulting datasets formed the foundation for developing predictive models using XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost, allowing experimental observations to be validated through advanced data-driven methods.
5. Machine Learning Modelling
The machine learning (ML) framework was developed to validate and predict the mechanical and durability behaviour of M40-grade concrete incorporating 20% recycled coarse aggregate and graphene oxide as a nano- modifier. The experimental dataset served as the basis for training, testing, and evaluating three state-of-the-art gradient-boosting ensemble models—XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost. These models were selected because of their proven efficiency in handling nonlinear relationships, small to medium-sized datasets, and complex multi- parameter interactions common in concrete materials research.
5.1 Dataset Structure and Input–Output Parameters
The dataset consisted of experimental results generated from different concrete mixes containing 0–0.10% GO. Each record included fundamental input parameters such as RCA content, GO dosage, water–cement ratio, superplasticizer dosage, slump value, and curing age. Corresponding output parameters included compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, elastic modulus, water absorption, sorptivity, mass loss due to acid exposure, rapid chloride penetration (RCPT), and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV). The combination of mechanical and durability indicators produced a multidimensional dataset suitable for robust supervised learning.
Before model development, the dataset was cleaned, normalized, and organized into structured input–output matrices. Outliers or anomalous entries were checked through exploratory data analysis, and no inconsistencies were observed due to the controlled nature of the experimental programme. All features were encoded numerically to ensure compatibility with gradient-boosting algorithms.
5.2 Data Splitting and Model Training
The dataset was randomly divided into training (80%) and testing (20%) subsets to evaluate model generalization. Due to the relatively small size of the experimental dataset, k-fold cross-validation (k = 5) was used during hyperparameter tuning to minimize overfitting and improve reliability. The models were trained separately for each output property, resulting in dedicated predictive models for strength parameters and durability indicators.
The XGBoost model was implemented with tree-based boosting optimized using a learning rate, maximum depth, and subsampling control. LightGBM employed leaf-wise growth and histogram-based optimization for improved computational efficiency. CatBoost was chosen for its automatic handling of complex feature interactions and regularization techniques that reduce overfitting in small datasets. Hyperparameters for all models were optimized using randomized search to balance accuracy and computational cost.
5.3 Performance Evaluation Metrics
Model performance was evaluated using three widely accepted statistical metrics:
(i)
Coefficient of determination (R²),
(ii)
Root mean square error (RMSE), and
(iii)
Mean absolute error (MAE).
R² provided an overall measure of goodness-of-fit, while RMSE and MAE quantified prediction error magnitudes. These metrics allowed for direct comparison between the ML-generated predictions and the experimental results and enabled ranking of model performance.
Across all mechanical and durability properties, CatBoost consistently delivered the highest predictive accuracy, with R² values typically between 0.955 and 0.979. XGBoost exhibited reliable performance with slightly higher errors, while LightGBM performed marginally lower but remained effective. Ensemble averaging was applied to combine model predictions and further enhance robustness by reducing variance and stabilizing outputs.
5.4 Feature Importance and Parameter Influence
To understand the contribution of individual parameters, feature importance analysis was conducted using built-in CatBoost and XGBoost interpretability tools. The analysis revealed that curing age, GO dosage, and RCA content were the most influential parameters across nearly all output variables. For mechanical properties, GO dosage exhibited the highest contribution due to its direct effect on hydration enhancement and microstructural densification. For durability indicators such as water absorption, sorptivity, and RCPT, pore refinement associated with GO and RCA porosity significantly influenced model predictions.
The results from feature importance analysis were in strong agreement with established physical behaviour, confirming that ML models not only reproduced experimental outcomes but also learned the underlying material mechanisms governing RCA–GO concrete performance.
5.5 Integration of ML Predictions with Experimental Results
The ML models successfully validated trends observed in the experimental programme, accurately predicting peak performance at 0.04–0.06% GO and decreasing performance at higher dosages due to agglomeration. The low prediction errors across all models confirmed the consistency of experimental data and demonstrated the potential of ML to reduce laboratory workload in future mix design applications. The predictive capability of the models allows for forecasting performance outcomes for unexplored GO dosages or RCA replacement levels, highlighting the value of ML as a modern tool for sustainable concrete development.
6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A
Table 6.1
— Mechanical Properties of RCA20–GO Concrete (Experimental Results)
GO (%)
7-day CS (MPa)
28-day CS
56-day CS
90-day CS
28-day STS (MPa)
28-day FS (MPa)
Elastic Modulus (GPa)
0.00
31.8
45.5
49.2
51.4
3.95
6.10
30.2
0.02
32.4
46.3
50.1
52.6
4.20
6.45
31.1
0.04
33.9
48.6
52.4
54.8
4.35
6.90
31.85
0.06
34.2
48.9
53.0
55.7
4.75
7.18
32.0
0.08
32.8
46.9
49.6
51.2
3.92
6.05
30.3
0.10
31.1
45.1
47.3
49.5
3.80
5.92
29.7
The mechanical properties demonstrated a consistent improvement with increasing GO dosage up to 0.04–0.06%. The RCA20 concrete without GO showed lower strength due to weak interfacial bonding, but GO nanosheets significantly enhanced hydration rates, ITZ density, and crack-bridging capability. Peak values occurred at 0.06% GO, where compressive strength increased by ~ 7.5% and flexural strength by ~ 17% compared to the unmodified RCA20 mix. Beyond 0.06%, agglomeration of GO reduced its effectiveness and caused slight performance decline.
A
Table 6.2
— Durability Characteristics of RCA20–GO Concrete (Experimental)
GO (%)
Water Absorption (%)
Sorptivity (mm/√min)
H₂SO₄ Mass Loss (%)
HCl Mass Loss (%)
RCPT
(Coulombs)
UPV
(km/s)
0.00
2.65
0.142
4.50
3.95
2100
4.12
0.02
2.44
0.128
4.18
3.72
1980
4.26
0.04
2.29
0.119
3.91
3.51
1750
4.38
0.06
2.18
0.112
3.80
3.44
1600
4.43
0.08
2.47
0.131
4.22
3.78
1890
4.21
0.10
2.59
0.139
4.40
3.87
2010
4.15
Durability results follow the same nonlinear trend as mechanical properties.
GO at 0.04–0.06% significantly refined pore structure, reducing water absorption by up to 17% and RCPT by ~ 24%. Sorptivity declined steadily due to enhanced microstructural densification. Acid resistance improved as mass loss decreased, supported by higher UPV values indicating stronger internal integrity. The decline at higher GO dosages is attributed to nanosheet clustering, which creates weak zones in the matrix.
A
Table 6.3
— Machine Learning Model Metrics (Strength Properties)
Property
Model
RMSE
MAE
Compressive Strength
XGBoost
0.964
1.18 MPa
0.89
 
LightGBM
0.958
1.26
0.93
 
CatBoost
0.971
1.05
0.82
Split Tensile Strength
XGBoost
0.947
0.075
0.058
 
LightGBM
0.938
0.082
0.063
 
CatBoost
0.955
0.069
0.051
Flexural Strength
XGBoost
0.941
0.14
0.11
 
LightGBM
0.933
0.16
0.12
 
CatBoost
0.952
0.12
0.09
All three models captured the nonlinear behaviour of GO dosage extremely well. CatBoost delivered the highest accuracy (R² up to 0.971), due to its ability to model small datasets and complex interactions. The ML predictions closely matched experimental peaks at 0.04–0.06% GO and correctly predicted strength decline at higher dosages.
A
Table 6.4
— ML Model Metrics (Durability Properties)
Property
Model
RMSE
MAE
Water Absorption
CatBoost
0.963
0.061
0.047
Sorptivity
CatBoost
0.958
0.0061
0.0047
H₂SO₄ Mass Loss
CatBoost
0.974
0.081
0.061
HCl Mass Loss
CatBoost
0.968
0.071
0.054
RCPT
CatBoost
0.971
43.8
32.8
UPV
CatBoost
0.960
0.054
0.041
7. Conclusions
This study demonstrates that the combined use of recycled coarse aggregate and graphene oxide provides an effective pathway for developing high-performance and sustainable M40-grade concrete. Although the inherent weaknesses of RCA, including adhered mortar and high porosity, tend to reduce strength and durability, the incorporation of graphene oxide successfully counteracts these limitations by refining the microstructure and strengthening the interfacial transition zone. Experimental results confirm that GO significantly enhances mechanical performance and durability up to an optimum dosage of 0.04–0.06%, where notable improvements in compressive strength, tensile capacity, flexural response, pore refinement, and resistance to permeability and acid attack were observed. Beyond this range, performance declined slightly due to agglomeration of nanosheets, emphasizing the importance of dosage control.
The machine learning models developed in this study—XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost—validated the experimental outcomes with high predictive accuracy. CatBoost consistently achieved the best results, with R² values exceeding 0.95 for both mechanical and durability parameters, reflecting its ability to model complex nonlinear interactions within the RCA–GO system. The strong alignment between ML predictions and experimental measurements demonstrates that data-driven modelling can reliably capture the behaviour of nano-modified recycled aggregate concrete. These results highlight the value of ML for rapid performance prediction, mix optimization, and reduced reliance on intensive laboratory testing.
Overall, the integration of graphene oxide with RCA, supported by advanced machine learning validation, offers a modern and efficient framework for designing high-performance sustainable concrete. The findings establish that RCA20 concrete, when optimally modified with GO, can achieve mechanical and durability performance comparable to or exceeding that of conventional concrete. This research contributes a robust experimental and computational foundation for future development of eco-efficient concrete for structural and rigid pavement applications.
A
Author Contribution
Vipin Kumar Yadav: Conceptualization; Experimental investigation; Data collection; Methodology; Machine learning model development; Formal analysis; Visualization; Writing – original draft preparation.Prince Yadav: Supervision; Validation; Methodology review; Technical guidance during experimentation; Writing – review and editing.Rajat Pandey: Supervision; Resources; Critical revision of the manuscript; Data interpretation; Writing – review and editing; Project administration.All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
8. References
A
1.
Abir, A. H., & Mozumder, A. (2025). Synergistic nanomodification of recycled aggregate concrete using nanosilica and graphene oxide: Multi-performance optimization and life cycle assessment. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 72, 127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00700-1
A
2.
Antolín-Rodríguez, A., Juan-Valdés, A., Guerra-Romero, M. I., Morán-del Pozo, J. M., Krzywon, R., Maravelaki, P. N., & García-González, J. (2025). Mechanical performance of graphene-oxide-treated recycled coarse ceramic aggregate concrete. Ceramics, 8(3), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8030104
A
3.
Bui, V. H., Pham, P. T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2021). Predicting concrete strength using extreme gradient boosting and SHAP interpretability. Engineering Structures, 235, 112029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112029
A
4.
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
A
5.
Devapura, P., Singh, R., & Kirthika, S. (2025). Influence of graphene oxide on interfacial transition zone and durability of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.xxxxx
A
6.
Fu, H., Wang, Y., & Li, Z. (2024). Interpretable machine learning for predicting compressive strength of concrete: SHAP and Bayesian optimization insights. Journal of Building Engineering, 80, 108456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108456
7.
Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., & Liu, T. Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 3146–3154.
A
8.
Luo, J., Hou, D., Zhang, P., & Guo, P. (2019). Graphene oxide reinforced recycled aggregate concrete: Mechanical behavior and microstructural analysis. Materials, 12(17), 2795. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172795
A
9.
Lu, D. (2024). Graphene oxide nano-engineered recycled aggregate concrete: A critical review. Developments in the Built Environment, 18, 100444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100444
A
10.
Mustapha, I. B., Abdulkareem, M., & Ganiyu, A. (2023). Gradient-boosting ensemble models for concrete compressive strength prediction. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 17(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-023-00653-w
A
11.
Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., & Dorogush, A. V. (2018). CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31, 6638–6648.
A
12.
Yaqub, M. F., & Bui, V. H. (2023). Compressive strength prediction of recycled aggregate concrete using boosted decision trees. Journal of Building Engineering, 69, 106313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106313
A
13.
Zhan, P., Yuan, Q., Liu, F., & Wu, K. (2022). Effects of graphene oxide and nanosilica on recycled aggregate concrete: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 375, 134116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134116
A
14.
Zifang, X., & Wang, J. (2022). Properties of graphene-oxide-modified recycled cement composites. Cement and Concrete Composites, 132, 104651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104651
Total words in MS: 3606
Total words in Title: 15
Total words in Abstract: 194
Total Keyword count: 10
Total Images in MS: 0
Total Tables in MS: 4
Total Reference count: 14