Hyperuricemia and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Mechanistic Exploration and Clinical Translation Study Based on Multi-Omics Integration and Real-World Evidence
YuXiaZi1
JiaMinHe1
WenXingFan1,2✉Email
1Department of NephrologyFirst Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityNo. 295, Xichang Road650032KunmingYunnan ProvinceChina
2Yunnan Key Laboratory of Organ TransplantationFirst Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityKunmingYunnan ProvinceChina
YuXia Zi 1, JiaMin He1, WenXing Fan* 1, 2.
1. Department of Nephrology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
2. Yunnan Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
* Corresponding Author: WenXing Fan
Abstract
Background
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), a severe microvascular complication of diabetes. Emerging evidence implicates hyperuricemia (HUA) as a critical yet underexplored contributor to DKD pathogenesis.
Methods
This study integrates cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), transcriptomic analysis from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and single-center real-world longitudinal cohort data. Using multivariate regression models, machine learning algorithms, differential gene expression analysis, and the individual slope method, we systematically investigated the association between HUA and DKD and its underlying mechanisms.
Results
Among 5,766 diabetic patients from NHANES, the prevalence of HUA was 38.7% in the DKD group. After multivariate adjustment, HUA independently increased the risk of DKD. Real-world data analysis of diabetic patients revealed the prevalence of HUA was 37.6% ,and a significant negative correlation between baseline serum uric acid levels and the annual estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline rate. Patients with HUA had an increased risk of rapid renal function decline. Transcriptomic analysis identified eight uric acid metabolism-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs). To assess clinical relevance, we analysed correlations between urate-related genes and DKD traits via Nephroseq v5. Our findings suggest that HUA may accelerate DKD progression via multi-aspect.
Conclusion
Hyperuricemia accelerates DKD progression through multiple molecular mechanisms. Personalized uric acid management strategies based on real-world evidence hold significant clinical importance.
Keywords:
Diabetic Kidney Disease
Hyperuricemia
Real-World Study
Machine Learning
Gene expression analysis
A
A
A
Introduction
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), one of the most severe microvascular complications of diabetes, affects approximately 40% of diabetic patients during disease progression[1]. While traditional risk factors such as hyperglycemia and hypertension are well-recognized, the mechanistic complexity of hyperuricemia as an emerging risk marker remains incompletely elucidated.
Recent studies have confirmed an independent association between serum uric acid levels and renal function decline[23]. However, existing evidence has important limitations: most studies rely on cross-sectional designs, making causal inference difficult; there is a lack of comprehensive analytical frameworks integrating population epidemiology, clinical longitudinal data, and molecular mechanisms; and the relationship between dynamic changes in uric acid and renal function progression in real-world settings is understudied.
HUA activates the renin‒angiotensin system (RAS), impairs endothelial nitric oxide release, and induces renal vasoconstriction and hypertension, ultimately exacerbating kidney injury[45]. Clinical studies have confirmed that elevated SUA levels correlate with mild reductions in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), even in individuals with normal baseline renal function[6]. Notably, polymorphisms in urate transporter genes (SLC2A9 and ABCG2) may modulate renal outcomes in HUA[79] .
This study innovatively constructs a triple evidence chain: first, confirming the cross-sectional association between HUA and DKD using nationally representative data; second, validating the long-term impact of HUA on renal function decline through a real-world longitudinal cohort; and finally, revealing potential biological mechanisms via transcriptomic analysis. This "macro-to-micro" integrated research strategy provides a comprehensive perspective for understanding the role of HUA in DKD.
Methods
Data Sources and Study Population
A
NHANES Data: Data from seven cycles (2005- March 2020) were extracted (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/) : 2005–2006 (10,348 participants), 2007–2008 (10,149 participants), 2009–2010 (10,537 participants), 2011–2012 (9,756 participants), 2013–2014 (10,175 participants), 2015–2016 (9,971 participants), and 2017–March 2020 (15,560 participants), totalling 76,496 eligible participants. Inclusion criteria: 1) Diagnosis of diabetes; 2) Complete measurement data on uric acid, serum creatinine (Scr), and albuminuria. Participants < 20 years, participants with malignancy or pregnancy status, or incomplete data were excluded.
Real-World Cohort: Data from patients attending a single center between 2020–2025 were collected. Inclusion criteria: 1) Diagnosis of diabetes; 2) At least three creatinine measurements ≥ 0.5 years apart; 3) Complete uric acid measurement data. Patients with acute kidney injury, Participants < 18 years, or incomplete data were excluded.
Transcriptomic Data: Two transcriptomic datasets (GSE30528 and GSE30529) from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) were selected for microarray analysis[10]. These datasets, generated via the GPL570 platform (Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array), encompass gene expression profiles from the glomerular and tubular compartments of renal tissues derived from 13 healthy controls and 9 DKD patients.
Definitions of Diabetes, DKD, and Hyperuricemia
Diabetes Mellitus: Participants were classified as having diabetes if they met ≥ 1 of the following criteria:
1.
Fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL;
2.
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5%;
3.
Current use of glucose-lowering agents or insulin;
4.
Self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes[11].
Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) was diagnosed by either a reduced eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (calculated via the CKD-EPI equation) or albuminuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR] ≥ 30 mg/g) [12].
Hyperuricemia (HUA) was defined as SUA ≥ 7.0 mg/dL (416.0 µmol/L) for males or ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (357.0 µmol/L) for females[4].
Covariates
Demographic and clinical variables were extracted from NHANES questionnaires, including age was categorized into ≥ 20, ≥40, and ≥ 60 years; And race/ethnicity was classified as Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or other[13]. Anthropometric measures included body mass index (BMI), which was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m²) and was stratified into normal (< 25 kg/m²), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m²), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m²) groups. Health-related variables included smoking status (defined as lifetime consumption of ≥ 100 cigarettes[14]) and hypertension status, identified through self-reported diagnosis, antihypertensive medication use, or elevated blood pressure (average systolic ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥ 90 mmHg)[15]. Laboratory analyses included Scr, HbA1c, UACR, and SUA, with the eGFR calculated via the CKD-EPI formula[16]. In subsequent weighted logistic regression and machine learning analyses, HbA1c was dichotomized using a cut-off of ≥ 6.5%[17], whereas UACR was categorized as normoalbuminuria (UACR < 30 mg/g), microalbuminuria (30–300 mg/g), or macroalbuminuria (> 300 mg/g)[18]. Socioeconomic factors included household income categorized by the ratio of family income to poverty (PIR) as low (≤ 1.3), middle (> 1.3–3.5), or high (> 3.5)[19]; education level (less than high school, high school/equivalent, or college/above); and marital status (married/cohabiting, widowed/divorced/separated, or never married). This comprehensive data framework enabled multi-aspect analysis of population health determinants.
Identification of Potential Key Uric Acid Metabolism-Related Genes Involved in DKD Pathogenesis
Differential expression analysis was conducted via the "limma" package in R, with thresholds set at |log2-fold change (FC)| >1 and adjusted P value < 0.05. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between DKD patients and healthy controls were subjected to pathway enrichment analysis via the "clusterProfiler" package. A curated set of 159 uric acid metabolism-related genes was retrieved from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB). Intersection analysis was conducted to identify overlapping DEGs associated with uric acid metabolism. External validation of the candidate DEGs was conducted via the Nephroseq V5 platform (Nephroseq Login).
Statistical Methods
All data processing and statistical analyses were performed in R (version 4.4.3; https://www.r-project.org/), incorporating sampling weights and complex survey design adjustments. Continuous variables are summarized as weighted medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs), whereas categorical variables are reported as weighted proportions.
For group comparisons, Student’s t tests or Mann‒Whitney U tests were used for continuous variables, and chi‒square tests were used for categorical data. The annual eGFR change rate for each patient was calculated using linear mixed models, fitting the model: eGFR = β₀ + β₁ × Time, where β₁ represents the individual slope[20]. The progression of DKD was defined as a ≥ 25% decline in eGFR from baseline, creating a dichotomous variable where patients meeting this threshold were coded as 1 (progressors) and others as 0 (non-progressors)[21].The machine learning models were evaluated via the "pROC" package. A two-tailed P value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Results
Characteristics of the NHANES Study Populations
The cohort included 5,766 diabetic patients, representing 23,225,972 US adults after weighting. Patients in the DKD group were older, less educated, and more likely to have hypertension and HUA. (38.7% vs. 21.6%) (Table 1).
Table 1
Baseline characteristics according to DKD status
 
DKD
p
0
1
n
15044682.1
8181290.4
 
Gender, n(%)
   
Male
7951767.3 (52.9)
4302797.8 (52.6)
0.906
Female
7092914.8 (47.1)
3878492.5 (47.4)
 
Age, years, n(%)
   
≥ 20
1884087.4 (12.5)
610560.0 (7.5)
< 0.001
≥ 40
7383115.6 (49.1)
2542433.1 (31.1)
 
≥ 60
5777479.1 (38.4)
5028297.3 (61.5)
 
Race , n(%)
   
Mexican American
1671859.2 (11.1)
920430.4 (11.3)
0.293
Non-Hispanic White
1099603.9 (7.3)
502929.0 (6.1)
 
Non-Hispanic Black
8547360.8 (56.8)
4568731.1 (55.8)
 
Non-Hispanic Asian
2250123.9 (15.0)
1367476.4 (16.7)
 
Other Race
1475734.3 (9.8)
821723.4 (10.0)
 
Education level , n(%)
   
Less than high school
3243175.4 (21.6)
2278714.3 (27.9)
< 0.001
High school grade or equivalent
3795087.8 (25.2)
2380191.4 (29.1)
 
Some college or above
8006418.9 (53.2)
3522384.6 (43.1)
 
Marital status , n(%)
   
Married/Living with Partner
10060541.7 (66.9)
4763990.3 (58.2)
< 0.001
Widowed/Divorced/Separated
3322535.0 (22.1)
2704437.8 (33.1)
 
Never married
1661605.4 (11.0)
712862.2 (8.7)
 
BMI, kg/m2, n(%)
   
< 25
1601215.2 (10.6)
948196.5 (11.6)
0.027
≥ 25
3961433.6 (26.3)
1824316.9 (22.3)
 
≥ 30
9482033.2 (63.0)
5408777.0 (66.1)
 
PIR, n(%)
   
≤ 1.3
3294487.6 (21.9)
2406448.9 (29.4)
< 0.001
≤ 3.5
6290423.9 (41.8)
3709686.5 (45.3)
 
> 3.5
5459770.6 (36.3)
2065155.0 (25.2)
 
Hypertension status , n(%)
   
No
5244231.6 (34.9)
1492458.8 (18.2)
< 0.001
Yes
9800450.5 (65.1)
6688831.5 (81.8)
 
hyperuricemia , n(%)
   
No
11789467.1 (78.4)
5015608.9 (61.3)
< 0.001
Yes
3255215.0 (21.6)
3165681.4 (38.7)
 
Smoking status, , n(%)
   
No
7824153.9 (52.0)
3931650.6 (48.1)
0.052
Yes
7220528.2 (48.0)
4249639.8 (51.9)
 
SUA(median [IQR])
5.300 [4.500, 6.300]
6.000 [4.900, 7.100]
< 0.001
UACR(median [IQR])
7.997 [5.320, 12.971]
60.740 [31.030, 170.571]
< 0.001
Scr (median [IQR])
0.810 [0.680, 0.940]
1.020 [0.771, 1.320]
< 0.001
HbA1c (median [IQR])
6.700 [6.100, 7.600]
7.000 [6.300, 8.400]
< 0.001
eGFR (median [IQR])
94.832 [81.611, 105.843]
68.490 [50.430, 96.826]
< 0.001
Cross-Sectional Association between Hyperuricemia and DKD
Multivariable logistic regression models showed that HUA was significantly associated with DKD before and after adjusting for age, race, education level, PIR, hypertension status, and HbA1c(Table 2).
Table 2
Association between HUA and DKD in patients with diabetes mellitus.
hyperuricemia
OR
95% CI
P
Model 1
   
(Intercept)
Reference
  
Yes
2.286
(1.950, 2.680)
< 0.001
Model 2
   
(Intercept)
Reference
  
Yes
2.170
(1.843, 2.555)
< 0.001
Model 3
   
(Intercept)
Reference
  
Yes
2.138
(1.822, 2.510)
< 0.001
95% CI = 95% confidence interval; OR = odds ratio
Model 1 = No adjusted
Model 2 = Adjusted for age, race and education level
Model 3 = Model 2 covariates + PIR + hypertension status + HbA1c status.
Machine Learning Prediction Models
A cohort of 5,766 diabetic patients was randomly divided into a training set (n = 4,037, 70%) and a test set (n = 1,729, 30%) at a ratio of 7:3. To evaluate the predictive performance of HUA for the development of DKD, five distinct machine learning algorithms, including least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, random forest, support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), neural network, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models, were employed.
In Table 3, among the five algorithms applied to the training set, the random forest model exhibited the highest predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.892 (Fig. 1a). In the test set, the LASSO regression model achieved the highest AUC-ROC (0.674, Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1
Click here to Correct
(a)
Click here to Correct
(b)
Table 3
The AUC-ROC curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV from different models.
 
LASSO regression
Random forest
Support vector machine
Neural network
XGBoost
Train
     
AUC of ROC
0.682
0.892
0.689
0.700
0.758
Accuracy
0.695
0.805
0.653
0.697
0.733
Sensitivity
0.414
0.866
0.604
0.653
0.699
Specificity
0.846
0.772
0.680
0.721
0.751
PPV
0.590
0.671
0.503
0.556
0.600
NPV
0.729
0.915
0.762
0.795
0.823
Test
     
AUC of ROC
0.674
0.632
0.661
0.645
0.659
Accuracy
0.661
0.607
0.633
0.646
0.674
Sensitivity
0.632
0.655
0.638
0.489
0.470
Specificity
0.677
0.580
0.630
0.735
0.790
PPV
0.525
0.468
0.493
0.510
0.558
NPV
0.765
0.749
0.755
0.718
0.725
The relative importance of the 11 selected features was evaluated in both the LASSO regression and random forest predictive models. For random forest, Variable importance was calculated using the Gini Importance method (Fig. 2a). For LASSO regression, Variable importance was ranked by the absolute magnitude of coefficients (Fig. 2b). Variable importance analysis identified age, HUA, and hypertension as the top three predictors for DKD.
Fig. 2
Click here to Correct
(a)
Click here to Correct
(b)
The relative importance of the 11 selected features. (a) features importance in random forest model. (b) features importance in LASSO regression model.
Real-World Longitudinal Cohort Analysis
The real-world cohort ultimately included 6,626 patients for analysis, the median follow-up years was 2.21 years. (Table 4).
Table 4
Baseline characteristics according to HUA status
 
hyperuricemia
p
0
1
n
4136
2493
 
age (mean (SD))
60.99 (13.48)
61.51 (13.95)
0.135
gender = M (%)
2582 (62.4)
1449 (58.1)
0.001
baseline_eGFR (median [IQR])
82.32 [54.77, 97.95]
55.18 [19.12, 82.73]
< 0.001
baseline_uric_acid (median [IQR])
5.20 [4.35, 5.89]
7.77 [7.13, 8.75]
< 0.001
eGFR_slope (median [IQR])
-0.64 [-5.06, 6.97]
-0.25 [-4.57, 5.89]
0.400
eGFR_follow_up_years (median [IQR])
2.30 [1.21, 3.55]
2.04 [1.05, 3.35]
< 0.001
Association between Uric Acid and Renal Function Decline
Linear regression analysis showed a significant negative correlation between baseline uric acid levels and the eGFR slope after adjusting for age, sex, and baseline eGFR. For every 1 mg/dL increase in uric acid, the annual eGFR decline rate increased by 0.506 mL/min/1.73m²/year (Table 5).
Table 5
Association between Uric Acid and eGFR slope
 
Estimate
Std. Error
t value
Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept)
23.419
1.495
15.67
< 0.001
baseline_uric_acid
-0.506
0.114
-4.426
< 0.001
age
-0.154
0.016
-9.545
< 0.001
gender = M
-1.048
0.443
-2.365
0.018
baseline_eGFR
-0.136
0.006
-22.121
< 0.001
Hyperuricemia and Rapid Renal Function Decline
Multivariable logistic regression indicated that patients with HUA had a 13.4% increased risk of rapid renal function decline. Other independent risk factors included age, male sex, and higher baseline eGFR levels (Table 6).
Table 6
Association between HUA and Progression of DKD
 
OR
95% CI
p
(Intercept)
0.141
(0.096, 0.207)
< 0.001
HUA
1.327
(1.160, 1.518)
< 0.001
age
1.01
(1.005, 1.015)
< 0.001
gender = M
1.272
(1.110, 1.461)
< 0.001
baseline_eGFR
0.992
(0.990, 0.994)
< 0.001
Identification of Uric acid metabolism-associated DEGs
Following standardization of the raw data and removal of outliers, our analysis identified 413 DEGs in the GSE30528 dataset, consisting of 273 downregulated and 139 upregulated genes. The subsequent intersection of these DEGs with uric acid metabolism-related genes yielded 2 significant urate-associated DEGs, including NME7 (NME/NM23 Family Member 7) and RRM2 (Ribonucleotide Reductase Regulatory Subunit M2).
In parallel, the GSE30529 dataset included 529 DEGs (73 downregulated and 456 upregulated), from which we identified 7 DEGs significantly associated with uric acid metabolism, including RRM2, GUCY1A1 (Guanylate Cyclase 1 Soluble Subunit Alpha 1), ADCY7 (Adenylate Cyclase 7), DCK (Deoxycytidine Kinase), PAPSS1 (Phosphoadenosine Phosphosulfate Synthase 1), IMPDH2(Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase 2), and ADA (Adenosine Deaminase).Notably, the RRM2 gene was consistently upregulated in both datasets, suggesting its potential as a key regulator in urate metabolic pathways (Table 7).
Table 7
The detailed characteristics of these uric acid metabolism-associated DEGs
 
Datasets
Gene
logFC
AveExpr
t
P.Value
adj.P.Val
B
Change
GSE30528
NME7
-1.237
-0.181
-5.450
< 0.001
0.001
3.092
Down
 
RRM2
1.361
0.388
3.906
0.001
0.011
-0.621
Up
GSE30529
IMPDH2
1.116
0.215
4.975
< 0.001
0.003
2.020
Up
 
PAPSS1
1.030
0.087
4.973
< 0.001
0.003
2.014
Up
 
GUCY1A1
1.249
-0.008
4.576
< 0.001
0.004
1.069
Up
 
ADCY7
1.224
0.271
4.366
< 0.001
0.006
0.569
Up
 
RRM2
1.050
0.341
4.206
< 0.001
0.007
0.190
Up
 
DCK
1.257
0.080
4.052
< 0.001
0.009
-0.174
Up
 
ADA
1.005
0.337
3.221
0.004
0.028
-2.094
Up
Clinical Correlation Analysis of Identified Uric Acid Metabolism-Related Genes in DKD
To evaluate the clinical relevance of these potential urate-regulating transcription factors, we performed correlation analyses between target genes and DKD clinical characteristics via the Nephroseq v5 online tool. The Nephroseq v5 data incorporated in this study were derived from multiple studies employing different GFR estimation equations (MDRD, CG, and CKD-EPI).
Notably, compared with non-DKD controls, DKD patients presented significantly increased mRNA expression of RRM2, IMPDH2, PAPSS1, GUCY1A1, ADCY7, DCK, and ADA, but decreased NME7 expression (Fig. 3).
Furthermore, in renal tissues, the mRNA expression levels of RRM2, IMPDH2, PAPSS1, GUCY1A1, and DCK were significantly negatively correlated with the GFR in DKD patients Intriguingly, ADCY7 and ADA expression correlated negatively with GFR in both DKD patients and controls, indicating their broader association with renal functional impairment. In contrast, NME7 expression was positively correlated with the GFR in both the DKD and control groups (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3
Click here to Correct
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Fig. 4
Click here to Correct
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. GFR: glomerular filtration rate.
Discussion
By integrating cross-sectional survey, real-world longitudinal cohort, and transcriptomic analysis, this study provides multi-level evidence for the role of HUA in DKD. Three main findings warrant emphasis:
First, cross-sectional analysis confirmed a strong association between HUA and DKD, consistent with previous studies. More importantly, real-world longitudinal data indicate that this association has a temporal cumulative effect—patients with HUA not only have worse baseline renal function but also experience a faster rate of renal function decline. This "double-hit" pattern suggests that HUA may act as an accelerator for DKD progression.
Second, real-world data revealed a dose-response relationship between uric acid levels and renal function decline. We found that even uric acid levels within the traditional normal range were associated with renal function decline, supporting the notion of "no safe threshold" for uric acid[22]. This finding provides evidence for revising current uric acid control targets.
Third, mechanistic studies elucidated that HUA likely affects the kidney through multiple pathways. Beyond known inflammatory and oxidative stress pathways, our transcriptomic analysis uncovered evidence of purine metabolic reprogramming. Specifically, the upregulation of RRM2 and IMPDH2 suggests that uric acid might directly participate in renal remodeling by influencing cell cycle and proliferation.
From a clinical practice perspective, our findings support: incorporating uric acid monitoring into routine DKD management; adopting more proactive renal protection strategies for diabetic patients with HUA; and establishing uric acid control targets based on individualized risk assessment.
A
Study strengths include the integration of multiple evidence chains and long-term follow-up real-world data. Limitations encompass potential confounding in real-world data and the single-center design. Future prospective intervention studies are needed to validate the impact of urate-lowering therapy on DKD progression.
Conclusion
This study, integrating epidemiological, real-world longitudinal, and transcriptomic evidence, confirms that hyperuricemia is a significant risk factor for the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease. Real-world evidence demonstrates that patients with hyperuricemia experience a faster rate of renal function decline, with a clear dose-response relationship. Mechanistically, hyperuricemia may accelerate renal injury through multiple pathways, including purine metabolic reprogramming, oxidative stress, and epigenetic regulation. These findings support the incorporation of uric acid control into comprehensive DKD management strategies and provide new insights for personalized treatment.
A
Acknowledgement
We acknowledge the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, Nephroseq.V5 platform contributors, and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) research team for providing open-access datasets that were indispensable to this study.
Reference
1.
Alicic RZ, Rooney MT, Tuttle KR. Diabetic Kidney Disease: Challenges, Progress, and Possibilities[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(12):2032–45.
2.
Zhu L, Wang X, Sun J, et al. Hyperuricemia Predicts the Progression of Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease in Chinese Patients[J]. Diabetes Ther. 2023;14(3):581–91.
3.
Ji P, Zhu J, Feng J, et al. Serum uric acid levels and diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A dose-response meta-analysis[J]. Prim Care Diabetes. 2022;16(3):457–65.
4.
Du L, Zong Y, Li H et al. Hyperuricemia and its related diseases: mechanisms and advances in therapy[J], 2024, 9(1): 212.
5.
Park JH, Jo YI, Lee JH. Renal effects of uric acid: hyperuricemia and hypouricemia[J]. Korean J Intern Med. 2020;35(6):1291–304.
6.
Li N, Wu J, Chen J, et al. Association between serum uric acid variability and mild eGFR decline in Chinese adults: a retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Nephrol. 2024;25(1):361.
7.
Ueda M, Fukui K, Kamatani N et al. GLUT9 as a potential drug target for chronic kidney disease: Drug target validation by a Mendelian randomization study[J], 2023, 68(10): 699–704.
8.
Wu S, Li C, Li Y, et al. SLC2A9 rs16890979 reduces uric acid absorption by kidney organoids[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1268226.
9.
Yin H, Liu N, Chen J. The Role of the Intestine in the Development of Hyperuricemia[J]. Front Immunol. 2022;13:845684.
10.
Woroniecka KI, Park AS, Mohtat D, et al. Transcriptome analysis of human diabetic kidney disease[J]. Diabetes. 2011;60(9):2354–69.
11.
Zhang Q, Xiao S, Jiao X, et al. The triglyceride-glucose index is a predictor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in CVD patients with diabetes or pre-diabetes: evidence from NHANES 2001–2018[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22(1):279.
12.
De Boer IH, Rue TC, Hall YN, et al. Temporal trends in the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease in the United States[J]. JAMA. 2011;305(24):2532–9.
13.
Ding L, Zhang H, Dai C, et al. The prognostic value of the stress hyperglycemia ratio for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetes or prediabetes: insights from NHANES 2005–2018[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23(1):84.
14.
Hou XZ, Lv YF, Li YS, et al. Association between different insulin resistance surrogates and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary heart disease and hypertension: NHANES longitudinal cohort study[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23(1):86.
15.
Yao Y, Wang B, Geng T, et al. The association between TyG and all-cause/non-cardiovascular mortality in general patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is modified by age: results from the cohort study of NHANES 1999–2018[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23(1):43.
16.
Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate[J]. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–12.
17.
Rooney MR, Rawlings AM, Pankow JS, et al. Risk of Progression to Diabetes Among Older Adults With Prediabetes[J]. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(4):511–9.
18.
Ferreira JP, Zannad F, Butler J, et al. Association of Empagliflozin Treatment With Albuminuria Levels in Patients With Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of EMPEROR-Pooled[J]. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(11):1148–59.
19.
Ruan Z, Lu T, Chen Y, et al. Association Between Psoriasis and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Among Outpatient US Adults[J]. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(7):745–53.
20.
Nishiwaki H, Missikpode C, Ricardo AC, et al. Time-Updated Estimated GFR Variability Is Associated With Mortality, Cardiovascular Disease, and End-Stage Kidney Disease in Patients With CKD: Findings From the CRIC Study[J]. Am J Kidney Dis. 2025;85(6):695–e7031.
21.
Park HC, Lee YK, Cho A, et al. Diabetic retinopathy is a prognostic factor for progression of chronic kidney disease in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(7):e0220506.
22.
Barnini C, Russo E. Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia and the Kidney: Lessons from the URRAH Study[J], 2025, 15(1).
A
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from Reserve Talents Project for Young and Middle-aged Academic and Technical Leaders of Yunnan Province (Project Number: 202205AC160062), Yunnan Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation (202449CE340016), Medical and Health Talents Project for Xingdian Talent Support Program of Yunnan Province (Project Number: XDYC-YLWS-2023-0030), and First-Class Discipline Team of Kunming Medical University (Project Number: 2024XKTDPY03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Nephrology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
YuXia Zi, JiaMin He & WenXing Fan
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
WenXing Fan
A
Author Contribution
Y.X.Z. and J.M.H. wrote the manuscript and analyzed data. W.X.F. conceptualized the study, critically reviewed the manuscript, and supervised revisions. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Y.X.Z. and J.M.H. wrote the manuscript and analyzed data. W.X.F.
A
conceptualized the study, critically reviewed the manuscript, and supervised revisions. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments Statement
"We acknowledge the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, Nephroseq.V5 platform contributors, and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) research team for providing open-access datasets that were indispensable to this study."
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to WenXing Fan.
Address: Department of Nephrology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 295, Xichang Road, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650032, China.
Telephone number and fax: +86-15987165447; +86-087165324888
E-mail: fanwx2020@163.com
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
A
The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration, which were developed by the World Medical Association.
A
This cohort study was approved by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University with a waiver for informed consent. Other data used in this study were extracted from public databases.
A
A
A
Data Availability
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. Data can be found below: [www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/](https:/www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes) ; [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) ;[Nephroseq Login](https:/www.nephroseq.org/resource/login.html) .
A
Anonymized data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request for legitimate research purposes.
Total words in MS: 3094
Total words in Title: 19
Total words in Abstract: 217
Total Keyword count: 5
Total Images in MS: 6
Total Tables in MS: 7
Total Reference count: 22