Implementation of SCT Evacuation System to Facilitate Evacuation Procedures in Building Construction Projects
SomjintanaKanangkaew1
NoppadonJokkaw2✉Email
TanitTongthong2
PhatsaphanCharnwasununth3
1Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
2Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
3Department of Housing, Faculty of ArchitectureChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
Somjintana Kanangkaew1, Noppadon Jokkaw2*, Tanit Tongthong2, and Phatsaphan Charnwasununth3
1Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
2Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
3Department of Housing, Faculty of Architecture, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Email addresses for the corresponding author(s): Noppadon.j@chula.ac.th
Abstract
The current communication system in the construction project is a non-interactive system between stakeholders. However, in an emergency, that party cannot control the communication system and provide the information to evacuate from the hazardous area directly, which is inappropriate for the dynamic nature of the construction project. Thus, this study aims to develop a communication system that supports evacuation routes in a dynamic nature, which could generate appropriate evacuation routes for construction workers and staff in construction projects. SCT Evacuation System was used to improve the decision-making process and provide the evacuation route to the construction workers and staff in the construction project. This study experimented using the proposed system and a MATALL Laser distance in the engine building construction project. The results show that the Percentage Difference between all markers, the distance, the exit, and the average Percentage Difference from the current location to the exit measured by the proposed system are lower than the MATALL Laser distance meter, which was less than 8%, 7%, 15%, respectively. Therefore, the proposed system could generate correct access information and provide real-time information for evacuation guidance. It is convenient for decision-making and helps users find destinations quickly and efficiently.
Keywords:
SCT Evacuation System
Evacuation Route
Construction Project
1 Introduction
Construction is a high-hazard industry encompassing a wide array of activities. The construction phase is particularly prone to accidents compared to other project stages. This heightened risk stems from the inherent complexity of construction projects, which often unfold in uncontrolled, unprepared, and dynamic environments. Each project progresses through multiple phases before completion, leading to continuous changes in workplaces, occupancy levels, available space, and viable evacuation routes [12] Furthermore, evacuation conditions during construction differ significantly from those in later phases. The potential for diverse and unpredictable disasters [3] makes pre-determining the most appropriate evacuation routes challenging. To compound these challenges, the prevailing communication systems on many construction sites are non-interactive, hindering effective communication between owners, contractors, consultants, and other stakeholders during emergencies. This inability to directly and promptly disseminate critical evacuation information can result in injuries and fatalities.
The construction project is a fragmented and dynamic sector with a project-based nature, as shown in Fig. 1. This means that many stakeholders operate in frequently changing relationships [4]. An essential key to an effective emergency response is a communication system that can relay accurate information quickly. Information should exist only once to achieve effective and reliable communication rather than being duplicated unnecessarily. Therefore, communications equipment must be utilized, procedures developed, and personnel trained. In contrast, the prevailing communication system in the construction industry is characterized by a non-interactive model among stakeholders, including owners, contractors, consultants, and other involved parties. This system primarily relies on traditional methods such as email, CAD drawings, phone calls, WhatsApp, and in-person site meetings. OSHA statistics [5] underscore that diverse emergencies, encompassing severe weather events, earthquakes, and structural failures, can necessitate rapid evacuation within construction projects. Therefore, ensuring the robustness of evacuation plans to accommodate such unforeseen events becomes paramount. Furthermore, existing communication systems frequently centralize safety monitoring and control responsibilities with a single entity. This approach proves inadequate in addressing the dynamic nature of construction projects, failing to furnish the necessary information to meet daily evacuation requirements. Consequently, current practices necessitate a paradigm shift towards enhanced information accessibility and facilitated interactive communication among all project stakeholders.
Fig. 1
Characteristics of the construction project.
Click here to Correct
Current practices within the construction industry often exhibit a disconnect between static fire exit signage and evacuation routes and the dynamic nature of construction environments [4]. This necessitates reliance on worker experience and intuition for navigating the evolving workplace, which can increase risk, particularly for new personnel unfamiliar with the project layout. Activities such as material handling and obstructing pathways further amplify this vulnerability. Such reliance on individual judgment in the face of shifting conditions poses a significant challenge to effective emergency evacuation procedures. While the construction industry adheres to site-specific fire safety planning practices that should be reviewed and updated regularly [5], the current evacuation plans are often not updated in line with the construction work schedule and environment. An abnormal event can result in situations, as shown in Fig. 2, where individuals become trapped by materials and equipment during a fire, contributing to high fatalities in construction site fires. In addition, this information is adapted from the author's doctoral thesis data presented [6], this study aims to develop a communication system that supports evacuation routes in a dynamic nature, which is a system that would generate appropriate evacuation routes for construction workers and staff in construction projects.
Fig. 2
An object obstructed by materials and equipment in the construction project.
Click here to Correct
2 Literature Review
2.1 Definition of Real-Time
Real-time systems have been defined as predictably fast enough for use by processes being serviced [7], there is a strict time limit by which a system must produce a response, regardless of the algorithm employed [8], and the ability of the system to guarantee a response after a domain defined fixed time has elapsed [9] and a system designed to operate with a well-defined measure of reactivity [1112].
2.1.1 Four aspects of Real-time performance
While speed is fundamental to real-time performance, speed alone is not real-time. The four aspects of real-time performance are:
Speed
Responsiveness
Timeliness
Graceful adaptation
2.2 General emergency procedures of the building
A
During a building emergency, it is imperative to promptly identify the nearest exit or alternative egress routes, mainly if the primary exit is inaccessible. Except in hostage scenarios, where remaining in place is advised, immediate evacuation from the hazardous area is crucial while conditions permit. Unnecessary use of emergency communication lines may impede the efficient allocation of critical resources to those in greatest need. Elevators should generally be avoided during emergencies; even if operational, they are reserved for authorized personnel assisting individuals with mobility limitations or young children. Elevator use is strictly prohibited during incidents involving fire or structural compromise. Consequently, stairwells become the primary means of egress during emergencies, which may result in congestion and delays.
2.3 Type of evacuation of the building
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) designates buildings exceeding 75 ft (approximately 23 meters) in height as high-rise structures (Kobes et al., 2010). This definition aligns with the Thai Building Control Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which similarly classifies buildings over 23 meters as high-rise buildings. Emergency evacuation within high-rises presents a considerable challenge due to the substantial occupant density within a limited space. The evacuation process comprises two distinct phases: horizontal and vertical movement. The intricate and often confusing layouts of high-rises, with numerous turns and obstacles, can impede evacuees' ability to locate exits and stairwells. Research indicates that route selection during internal evacuations significantly impacts both the time required and the overall efficiency of the evacuation process [13].
2.4 Type of evacuation of the building
The Emergency Response Procedure for a construction project must continuously undergo review and revision to meet changing conditions. To ensure the efficacy of an Emergency Response Procedure, the Construction Safety Association of Ontario (2003) emphasizes the importance of comprehensive communication to all site personnel. The following measures are recommended as follows:
Conduct thorough reviews of the procedure with new site subcontractors and workers: Ensure the procedure
Engage in proactive discussions with suppliers: Identify and address any potential hazards related to the storage or delivery of their materials.
Collaborate with the owner/client to review new work areas in operating plants: Identify and incorporate any new hazards into the procedure.
Establish regular reviews of the procedure with the Joint Health and Safety Committee or Health and Safety Representative: Ensure the procedure remains current and addresses any emerging hazards or significant changes in site conditions.
Display the procedure prominently in a readily accessible location: Guarantee easy access and visibility for all personnel.
The Emergency Response Procedure for any construction project must be subject to ongoing review and revision to remain adaptable to dynamic site conditions.
2.5 The current practice guides construction projects
Construction sites inherently harbor many hazards that pose significant risks to workers and personnel. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) National Traumatic Occupational Fatality (NTOF) database reveals a concerning statistic: from 1980 to 1995, the construction industry witnessed 220 deaths attributed to fires and an additional 354 deaths resulting from explosions, averaging a disturbing 36 fire and explosion-related fatalities per year. To mitigate the potential for such incidents and safeguard the well-being of those involved in construction projects, the development and implementation of a comprehensive, site-specific fire prevention and inspection policy is paramount. This proactive measure minimizes the risks associated with fire and explosion hazards throughout all construction phases, ultimately fostering a safer working environment.
2.5.1 Fire escape and evacuation training
Fire escape and evacuation training, a cornerstone of the working group's annual initiatives, enhances construction workers' and staff's understanding of critical workplace safety, health, and environmental protocols. A key focus of this training is to provide participants with practical experience in executing appropriate fire evacuation procedures. The comprehensive training program encompasses five fundamental stages:
Fire Hazard Recognition and Prevention: Empowering employees to identify and effectively mitigate fire risks within their workplace.
Fire Response Training: Equipping personnel with the knowledge and skills to respond appropriately and decisively in the event of a fire.
Evacuation Plan Development: Formulating detailed and well-structured plans to facilitate safe and efficient evacuation during emergencies.
Regular Fire Drills: Reinforcing evacuation procedures and fostering a culture of preparedness through routine, practical exercises.
Fire Safety Equipment Maintenance: Ensuring all fire safety equipment remains in optimal working condition through systematic inspection and maintenance protocols.
2.5.2 Toolbox Talks in Construction
Toolbox talks, consisting of concise presentations or discussions focused on a specific health and safety aspect, have long been recognized as effective for supervisors to disseminate critical safety information in the construction sector [14]. These talks encompass a wide array of vital topics, including first aid, confined spaces, the proper use of equipment, tools, and appliances, the significance of personal protective equipment, electrical safety, falling object hazards, and emergency and rescue procedures. Within emergency and rescue procedures, toolbox talks are crucial for enhancing workers' comprehension of evacuation protocols' critical role in construction projects. They facilitate interactive discussions, guiding workers toward resources containing vital information about evacuation procedures specific to their workplace. Furthermore, toolbox talks elucidate appropriate actions during emergencies, emphasizing each individual's responsibility in ensuring a safe and successful evacuation.
A
Fig. 3
Toolbox Talks in Construction.
Click here to Correct
2.6 Visualization technology employed to enhance communication
Visualization technology is a potent communication instrument [15] within the construction project. In part of drawing up prior research encompassing evacuation routes, influential factors, and preventive measures to reduce injuries and fatalities during emergencies, the subsequent visualization techniques have found practical application in construction projects. The advantages of these techniques are multifaceted, encompassing the lucid presentation of complex data, visual identification of hazardous areas, informed decision-making, and enhanced collaboration between staff and engineers for effective problem-solving. Consequently, a comprehensive overview of pertinent topics, study areas, and relevant visualization technologies is presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Summary of the previous research related to evacuation route.
Authors
Construction phase
Visualization technology
Focus of research
BIM
AR
Others
Shiau, Lu, and Chang [16]
Post-Construction
-
Fire detector system and evacuation notice
Choi, Choi, and Kim (2014) [17]
Pre-Construction
-
-
Checking for escape stairs installation and exit routes
Wang et al. (2014) [18]
Post-Construction
-
Time to evacuate and safety education and training
Cheng et al. (2016) [19]
Post-Construction
-
Fire prevention equipment information
Kim and Lee (2019) [20]
Pre-Construction
-
-
Pathfinding
Ma and Wu (2020) [21]
Post-Construction
-
Monitoring of building fire.
Wehbe and Shahrour (2021) [22]
Post-Construction
-
Fire evacuation fatalities and optimize evacuation routes
Deng et al. (2014) [23]
Post-Construction
-
Emergency evacuation navigation
Tongthong et al. (2023) [24]
Post-Construction
-
Extinguisher installation plan, appropriate locations of fire extinguishers, and unsafe areas
Ahn and Han (2011) [25]
Post-Construction
-
-
The shortest path
Feng and Kamat (2012) [26]
Post-Construction
-
-
Navigation and inspection
Wang et al. (2014) [27]
Post-Construction
-
The shortest path and fire evacuation guidance
Cheng et al. (2017) [28]
Post-Construction
-
-
Fire prevention equipment information and route optimization information for evacuation and rescue
Li et al. (2019) [29]
Construction
-
Map construction under fire conditions, fire detection, and rescue.
Nam et al. (2019) [29]
Post-Construction
-
Evacuation route
Maran et al. (2023) [30]
Post-Construction
-
Indoor navigation route
Yoo and Choi (2022) [32]
Post-Construction
-
Navigation and emergency system
2.7 Research gap
The literature review indicates that a diversity of evacuation systems has been explored in prior research. However, a prevailing limitation lies in the lack of emphasis on interactive communication, particularly real-time communication capable of dynamically generating evacuation routes that respond to the evolving conditions inherent to construction phases. Furthermore, existing systems often prioritize post-construction scenarios and base evacuation route recommendations solely on the shortest distance, neglecting to incorporate critical information such as voice and arrow guidance, virtual green lines, exit locations, distances from current location to exits, and the most contextually relevant evacuation route within the construction project itself. To address this gap, the present study endeavors to develop a communication system that facilitates evacuation from hazardous locations by leveraging real-time information. This proposed system will enable optimized decision-making and guidance during emergencies.
3 Overview of Construction Site Survey
A
This research endeavors to develop an innovative safety management system specifically designed to accommodate the inherent dynamism of construction projects. Recognizing the direct influence construction activities exert on evacuation routes and work schedules, which can impact evacuation performance, this system integrates visualization technologies informed by the literature, as mentioned in a literature review. According to the field observations, they were conducted at high-rise building construction projects. These observations comprised comprehensive walk-in surveys to capture a holistic overview of safety management practices at each project. Aspects such as established evacuation routes, fire emergency procedures, and the current implementation status of these measures were meticulously documented. Photographic and video documentation were employed to supplement these observations. It is noteworthy that, during the surveys, emergency procedures like evacuation routes depicted in construction drawings and fire exit signs were consistently observed across all sample construction projects, as shown in Fig. 4 to Fig. 5
Fig. 4
Evacuation routes in the current construction project.
Click here to Correct
Fig. 5
Fire exit signs in the current construction project.
Click here to Correct
Despite regulatory requirements for precise and readily visible exit signage, many construction projects fall short of compliance. Inadequate placement, insufficient lighting, and a failure to update signage to reflect changes in the construction environments can create confusion and hinder effective evacuation during emergencies. The dynamic nature of construction sites exacerbates this challenge. Daily shifts in work areas, personnel, and routes can lead to unfamiliarity with evacuation plans, particularly for new workers. Under the time pressure of an emergency, this unfamiliarity can increase the likelihood of errors in judgment and delays in evacuation, potentially resulting in severe consequences. Findings from construction site surveys have highlighted several critical factors contributing to injuries and fatalities arising from accidents within construction projects:
Insufficient knowledge of evacuation routes: Many construction workers and staff demonstrate unfamiliarity or lack of awareness concerning designated evacuation paths.
Obstacles hindering evacuation: The inherent nature of construction sites often presents physical impediments that obstruct swift and safe egresses during emergencies.
Dynamic nature of routes leading to unfamiliarity: The constantly evolving layout of construction sites can engender confusion and disorientation, particularly concerning identifying the most optimal evacuation routes on any given day.
Difficulty interpreting evacuation plans: Complex or inadequately designed evacuation plans can prove challenging to comprehend and execute under stressful conditions.
Limited understanding of toolbox talks: Deficiencies in understanding safety information and procedures communicated during toolbox talks can leave workers ill-prepared to respond effectively during emergencies.
These findings emphasize the need to enhance safety communication protocols and elevate the efficacy of evacuation planning within the construction industry. Moreover, on-site assessments underscored the limitations of existing fire emergency procedures. Two-dimensional (2-D) fire evacuation plans were found to lack clarity and often remained static, failing to reflect the dynamic nature of construction sites. The absence of clear and strategically placed fire exit signs, compounded by the presence of unclear or outdated signage, further amplifies the risk of confusion and delays during evacuations. The constantly changing work areas and routes inherent to construction environments underscore the need for an adaptive fire evacuation system. Developing a novel fire evacuation route system capable of dynamically responding to the evolving construction landscape is proposed to address these critical concerns. This system would seamlessly integrate with construction schedules, ensuring evacuation routes are updated in real-time to reflect current site conditions. By automating the generation of appropriate evacuation routes, the system would proactively address the issue of inadequate fire evacuation guidance. This powerful decision-making tool would significantly enhance safety by providing construction workers and staff with clear and readily understandable evacuation information, mitigating potential hazards during fire emergencies.
4 Development of the proposed system
The Self Care using Technology Evacuation System (SCT Evacuation System) is a marker-based Augmented Reality (AR) application that leverages Building Information Modeling (BIM) and specialized coding to furnish real-time guidance and information to construction personnel during emergencies. The system facilitates safe evacuation from hazardous locations and offers dynamic material handling route guidance that adapts to the evolving construction environments. During the initial setup, as shown in Fig. 7, the system prompts users to input their current workday, name, and surnames, enabling personalized identification and tracking. This information is displayed within the system, as shown in Fig. 8. Developed in response to on-site observations, the SCT Evacuation System comprises three cores’ components: BIM authoring, marker-based location, and application authoring. The system addresses the challenges posed by the dynamic nature of construction sites, where obstructions and changes in layout are commonplace, particularly during emergencies. By automating the generation of contextually relevant evacuation routes and providing clear, real-time guidance, the SCT Evacuation System is a powerful decision-making tool, empowering construction workers and staff to navigate safely and efficiently during critical situations. The system's intuitive user interface, as shown in Fig. 9, further enhances its usability and effectiveness in promoting a safer construction environment.
A
Fig. 6
The Self Care using Technology Evacuation System (SCT Evacuation System).
Click here to Correct
Fig. 7
Initial setup to identify the users.
Click here to Correct
Fig. 8
The system output displayed information of users.
Click here to Correct
The development of the Self Care using Technology Evacuation System (SCT Evacuation System) aimed to furnish construction workers and staff with essential evacuation information and route guidance. Comprising three distinct modules: BIM authoring, marker-based location, and application authoring, the prototype system leverages marker- based Augmented Reality (AR) technology and integrates Building Information Modeling (BIM) alongside specialized coding to provide real-time, visually enhanced guidance during emergencies. Each module within the system boasts unique preparation, input, process, and output components, generating diverse data streams that collectively contribute to the proposed system's visualization capabilities. This holistic approach to safety management empowers construction personnel with invaluable real-time information and decision- making support during evacuation scenarios.
The proposed system delivers crucial information, including the user's precise location, facilitating accurate distance-to-exit calculations. It further enhances evacuation guidance through voice and arrow directions, a virtual green line delineating the evacuation path, clear identification of exits, and dynamic distance updates. User identification functionality and the capacity to adapt evacuation routes to encounter obstacles further bolster the system's efficacy and adaptability.
Fig. 9
An example of the output of the proposed system could be recommended to the user to the next exit instead.
Click here to Correct
5 System Verification
The proposed system incorporates many functionalities, notably calculating and presenting the shortest evacuation route from the user's current position to the nearest exit, accompanied by a visually intuitive virtual green line for guidance. These functionalities underwent rigorous testing in both simulated and real-world environments to ensure the system's accuracy and reliability. During testing, the potential impact of weak internet connectivity on system performance was identified and mitigated through a personal hotspot. This comprehensive testing approach validated the system's efficacy in providing precise and practical evacuation guidance, even under challenging network conditions.
5.1 Verifying the accuracy of the proposed system
Within the scope of this research, comprehensive distance measurement experiments were conducted to validate the accuracy of the proposed system across both simulated and real-world scenarios. Leveraging markers with predefined patterns embedded within the 3D model and utilizing the application's inherent calibration system, the evacuation route distance—representing the path from the current location to the designated exit—underwent meticulous assessment.
In the experimental setup, manual measurements of the evacuation route distance were complemented by those obtained via the MATALL Laser distance meter, a high-precision instrument engineered explicitly for indoor measurements, as shown in Fig. 10. Concurrently, the application independently calculated the evacuation route distance and subsequently identified the shortest path within the proposed system framework.
Fig. 10
The MATALL Laser distance meter.
Click here to Correct
This study employed a virtual environment case study to validate the proposed system. A high-rise construction project, specifically the engine building project at Chulalongkorn University Demonstration Secondary School, served as the testbed. This six-story structure, with a total area of 1,032.83 square meters and a height of 26.10 meters, as shown in Fig. 11, provided a realistic context for evaluating the system's efficacy.
Fig. 11
The construction project for an engine building.
Click here to Correct
In the case study, markers were strategically positioned at intervals of 3.00 meters, maintaining a consistent height of 1.20 meters above floor level. Fifty-three markers, serving as nodal points, were strategically distributed across the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd floors, demarcating key areas such as rooms, corners, and exits, and visually represented as blue boxes in Figs. 11 to 14. These nodes adhered to a uniform spacing of 3.00 meters. Marker enumeration followed a clockwise pattern originating from marker 101 in the upper right quadrant.
Fig. 12
Marker preparation and installation on the 1st floor.
Click here to Correct
Fig. 13
Marker preparation and installation on the 2nd floor.
Click here to Correct
Fig. 14
Marker preparation and installation on the 3rd floor.
Click here to Correct
A
Fig. 15
Example of the marker's location in the virtual environment.
Click here to Correct
The proposed system utilizes marker-based measurements to dynamically calculate the distance between the user's current location and the nearest exit, providing real-time feedback in meters. The process is initiated by capturing an image containing a marker, which serves as the origin point, leveraging its embedded XYZ coordinate data. This information then calculates the distance to the designated exit within the construction environment.
The system offers a multifaceted information display to enhance user experience and ensure practical guidance. This includes textual representation of distance and exit location and voice and arrow-based directional cues. Virtual green line is also superimposed on the output screen, visually guiding the user along the optimal evacuation path. The system's adaptability is further demonstrated by its ability to recalculate distances and provide updated guidance in real-time should the user deviate from the prescribed route or move further away from the exit.
To validate the system, it involved strategically deploying fifty-three markers across the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd floors. These markers, serving as nodal points to define rooms, corners, and exits, as shown in Fig. 16, were spaced at 3.00-meter intervals and followed a clockwise numbering scheme, commencing from 101 in the upper right quadrant.
Fig. 16
Installation of markers in the construction project.
Click here to Correct
A
Fig. 17
Example of the marker's location in the real environment.
Click here to Correct
This experiment utilized the MATALL laser distance meter, a sophisticated indoor measurement instrument, to precisely determine the distance between each designated marker position and the corresponding exit. Three measurements were taken from each marker location to the exit, and the average distance was subsequently calculated. This average distance was then compared against the corresponding exit distance data generated by the proposed system, with all measurements recorded in meters.
Fig. 18
Measure the distance using the Matall Laser Distance meter.
Click here to Correct
From the testing in both virtual and real environments, the distance results were analyzed using the percentage difference, which is the difference between two values divided by the average of the two values shown as a percentage, using Eq. 1 as follows:
Percentage Difference =
(1)
Where
V1 = the distance from MATALL Laser distance meter
V2 = the distance from the proposed system
Then, the average of the percentage difference (𝑥̅) can be determined as presented in Eq. 2 as follows:
𝑥̅ =
(2)
Where
𝑥 = the percentage difference
N = the number of measurements
5.2 Comparison of the difference in the distance between the proposed system and the MATALL Laser distance meter
The distance between the proposed system and the MATALL Laser distance meter was compared using the Percentage Difference in Eq. 1 and the average of the Percentage Difference (𝑥̅) in Eq. 2. The comparison results are presented in Table 2 to Table 4. The average distance of percentage difference was 8%, 7%, and 15%, respectively, and the graphs from Fig. 19 to Fig. 21 were created from the comparison of the difference in the distance between the proposed system and the MATALL Laser distance meter and summarized the percentage difference of all markers, respectively.
Table 2
Average The Distance, Exit, and Percentage Difference from the current location to the exit on the 1st floor.
Marker
No.
Distance (m.)
Exit
Distance
Difference (m.)
Percentage Difference
Proposed System
The MATALL Laser distance meter
101
10.25
10.65
1
0.40
4%
102
12.74
13.99
1
1.25
9%
103
12.56
13.43
1
0.87
6%
104
10.47
10.77
1
0.30
3%
105
7.78
8.67
1
0.89
10%
106
5.89
6.60
1
0.71
11%
107
5.95
6.62
2
0.67
10%
108
8.85
9.09
1
0.24
3%
Table 2
Average The Distance, Exit, and Percentage Difference from the current location to the exit on the 1st floor (continued).
Marker
No.
Distance (m.)
Exit
Distance
Difference (m.)
Percentage Difference
Proposed System
The MATALL Laser distance meter
109
10.13
11.33
1
1.20
11%
110
5.44
5.66
1
0.22
4%
111
4.02
4.64
1
0.62
13%
112
5.56
5.93
1
0.37
6%
113
5.02
5.32
1
0.30
6%
114
2.54
3.02
1
0.48
16%
Fig. 19
Comparison of the distance between the proposed system and the MATALL Laser distance meter on the 1st floor.
Click here to Correct
Table 3
Average The Distance, Exit, and Percentage Difference from the current location to the exit on the 2nd floor.
Marker
No.
Distance (m.)
Exit
Distance
Difference (m.)
Percentage Difference
Proposed System
The MATALL Laser distance meter
201
34.58
36.82
1
2.24
6%
202
34.33
32.87
1
2.09
6%
203
29.52
36.89
1
4.86
14%
Table 3
Average The Distance, Exit, and Percentage Difference from the current location to the exit on the 2nd floor (continued).
Marker
No.
Distance (m.)
Exit
Distance
Difference (m.)
Percentage Difference
Proposed System
The MATALL Laser distance meter
204
26.10
29.68
1
3.58
12%
205
25.93
31.14
1
5.21
17%
206
26.06
28.55
1
2.49
9%
207
22.76
25.96
1
3.20
12%
208
23.18
23.69
1
0.51
2%
209
23.00
26.28
1
3.28
12%
210
30.17
30.19
1
0.02
0%
211
24.95
30.66
1
5.71
19%
212
25.62
27.16
1
1.54
6%
213
24.48
24.71
1
0.23
1%
214
22.64
23.49
1
0.85
4%
215
24.37
25.08
1
4.71
3%
216
21.07
21.41
1
0.34
2%
217
19.54
20.41
1
0.87
4%
218
20.23
21.01
1
0.78
4%
219
14.32
15.72
1
1.40
9%
Fig. 20
Comparison of the distance between the proposed system and the MATALL Laser distance meter on the 2nd floor.
Click here to Correct
Table 4
Average The Distance, Exit, and Percentage Difference from the current location to the exit on the 3rd floor.
Marker
No.
Distance (m.)
Exit
Distance
Difference (m.)
Percentage Difference
Proposed System
The MATALL Laser distance meter
301
43.39
50.38
1
6.99
14%
302
42.60
50.45
1
7.85
16%
303
42.05
51.08
1
9.03
18%
304
38.90
48.62
1
9.72
20%
305
38.64
43.32
1
4.68
11%
306
35.10
42.99
1
7.89
18%
307
38.42
43.40
1
4.98
11%
308
46.65
47.96
1
1.31
3%
309
48.10
52.55
1
4.45
8%
310
48.36
55.54
1
7.18
13%
311
42.59
52.63
1
10.04
19%
312
42.08
51.16
1
9.08
18%
313
40.89
47.46
1
6.57
14%
314
41.80
43.92
1
2.12
5%
315
41.61
43.75
1
2.14
5%
316
38.62
47.74
1
9.12
19%
317
35.33
48.95
1
13.62
28%
318
35.57
47.74
1
12.17
25%
319
35.65
41.44
1
5.79
14%
Fig. 21
Comparison of the distance between the proposed system and the MATALL Laser distance meter on the 3rd floor.
Click here to Correct
Both virtual and real-world testing, as presented in Tables 2 to 4 and Figs. 18 to 21, reveal that the average percentage difference between the distances measured by the proposed system and the MATALL laser distance meter is consistently low, remaining below 8%, 7%, and 15%, respectively, across all markers, distance to exit, and the overall average percentage difference. This empirical evidence substantiates the efficacy of the proposed system in providing accurate and timely information, including current location, exit identification, shortest route distance, and multimodal evacuation guidance comprising a virtual green line, voice, and directional arrows. These features collectively empower users to make informed decisions and navigate efficiently toward safety during emergencies.
6 Discussion of the feasibility of the proposed system implementation
The feasibility of deploying the proposed communication system within real-world construction environments was rigorously evaluated based on empirical data from virtual and real-world testing scenarios. The system's principal strength resides in its strategic integration of visualization technologies, such as BIM and AR, to facilitate the provision of dynamic evacuation routes and material handling guidance, adeptly accommodating the ever-evolving nature of construction projects. This capability proves particularly beneficial in aiding decision-making for personnel unfamiliar with the intricacies of the project layout. However, the system's practical implementation is contingent upon the meticulous execution of the BIM authoring process, which necessitates accurate as-built drawings for precise spatial positioning and exit information, forming the foundation for a robust virtual model. The marker-based location functionality bridges the gap between the physical and virtual realms, dynamically identifying user locations and generating contextually relevant evacuation routes. Nevertheless, it is essential to acknowledge certain limitations inherent to the system. Its operational effectiveness is predicated on the availability of markers and a stable internet connection. While using CCTV cameras presents a potential avenue for circumventing these limitations through user identification and tracking, this approach entails considerable financial investment and logistical complexities. The application authoring process, responsible for the system's capacity to provide evacuation information and material handling guidance, successfully addresses a critical void in existing visualization tools tailored for construction sites.
Of particular significance is the fact that the proposed system, while requiring specialized computer programming expertise for its development and maintenance, obviates the need for resource-intensive solutions such as CCTV-based monitoring, thus offering a more streamlined and cost-effective alternative for enhancing safety within construction environments.
7 Conclusion
The proposed system underwent rigorous testing in laboratory and real-world construction environments to validate its performance and the accuracy of its algorithms. Leveraging Augmented Reality (AR) technology, the system successfully delivered real-time information to users, including virtual green line path visualization, voice and arrow-based directional guidance, exit identification, and dynamic distance calculations superimposed onto the physical scene via mobile devices. A comprehensive experiment conducted within the engine building construction project at Chulalongkorn University Demonstration Secondary School across three floors demonstrated the system's efficacy. Comparative analysis with the MATALL Laser distance meter revealed a consistently low percentage difference in distance measurements, underscoring the system's accuracy and reliability in generating real-time evacuation guidance. Providing crucial information such as current location, exit points, evacuation route distances, and multi-modal guidance facilitates rapid and informed decision-making, enabling users to navigate safely and efficiently during emergencies.
Despite the promising results, several limitations were identified as follows:
The system's current focus is specifically tailored to enhancing evacuation procedures and route guidance within the context of construction projects. Its applicability to other types of construction projects warrants further investigation.
Development occurred within a single laptop environment with network connectivity for data sharing, potentially limiting scalability and broader deployment.
The reliance on marker-based location necessitates continuous marker visibility for uninterrupted operation, posing potential challenges in environments with limited or obstructed views.
Factors such as marker quality, internet signal strength, and the inherent accuracy of location-tracking technology can impact the system's overall performance and reliability.
These limitations highlight areas for future research and development, aiming to refine and expand the capabilities of the proposed system and maximize its potential for enhancing safety across a broader range of construction and emergency response scenarios.
Declarations
A
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
A
Author Contribution
Conceptualization, N.J. and T.T.; methodology, T.T.; software, S.K.; validation, S.K. and P.C.; formal analysis, S.K.; investigation, S.K.; resources, S.K.; data curation, P.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.; writing—review and editing, N.J., T.T., and P.C.; visualization, S.K.; supervision, N.J. and T.T.; project administration, S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Competing interests
(include appropriate disclosures)
Not applicable.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
A
Clinical Trial Number
Not applicable.
A
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
1.
Sardroud JM. Influence of RFID technology on automated management of construction materials and components. Scientia Iranica. Jun. 2012;19(3):381–92. 10.1016/j.scient.2012.02.023.
2.
Marzouk M, Daour IA. Planning labor evacuation for construction sites using BIM and agent-based simulation, Safety Science, vol. 109, pp. 174–185, Nov. 2018, 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.023
3.
Cheng M-Y, Chiu K-C, Hsieh Y-M, Yang I-T, Chou J-S. Development of BIM-Based Real-time Evacuation and Rescue System for Complex Buildings, Proceedings of the 33rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Jul. 2016, 10.22260/isarc2016/0120
4.
Mieke H, Reymen I, Dewulf G. The problem of communication in construction. In International Conference on Adaptable Building Structures, ADAPTABLES 2006, pp. 12–14. Eindhoven University of Technology, 2006.
5.
Soltani AR, Tawfik H, Goulermas JY, Fernando T. Path planning in construction sites: performance evaluation of the Dijkstra, A∗, and GA search algorithms, Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 291–303, Oct. 2002, 10.1016/s1474-0346(03)00018-1
6.
Kanangkaew S. A communication system to support evacuation route in the building construction project, 2023, Doctoral dissertation. Chulalongkorn University.
7.
Choe S, Leite F. Construction safety planning: Site-specific temporal and spatial information integration. Autom Constr. Dec. 2017;84:335–44. 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.007.
8.
Dodhiawala RT, Sridharan NS, Raulefs P. and Cynthia Pickering. Real-Time AI Systems: A Definition and An Architecture. In IJCAI, pp. 256–64. 1989.
9.
O'Reilly CA, Cromarty AS. Fast Is Not Real-Time: Designing Effective Real-Time AI Systems. Applications of Artificial Intelligence II. Volume 548. SPIE; 1985. pp. 249–57.
A
10.
Read JY, Schmidt JL, Kao SM, Laffey TJ. Real-Time Knowledge-Based Monitoring Of Telemetry Data. Appl Artif Intell VI Mar. 1988. 10.1117/12.947028.
11.
Georgeff MP, Felix I. Decision-making in an embedded reasoning system. In International joint conference on artificial intelligence. 1989.
12.
Kobes M, Helsloot I, de Vries B, Post JG. Building safety and human behaviour in fire: A literature review. Fire Saf J. Jan. 2010;45(1):1–11. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.08.005.
13.
Ding N, Chen T, Zhu Y, Lu Y. State-of-the-art high-rise building emergency evacuation behavior. Physica A. Jan. 2021;561:125168. 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125168.
14.
Olson R, Varga A, Cannon A, Jones J, Gilbert-Jones I, Zoller E. Toolbox talks to prevent construction fatalities:Empirical development and evaluation. Saf Sci. Jul. 2016;86:122–31. 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.009.
15.
Han S, Peña-Mora F, Golparvar-Fard M, Roh S. Application of a Visualization Technique for Safety Management, Computing in Civil Engineering (2009), Jun. 2009. 10.1061/41052(346)54
16.
SHIAU Y-C, TSAI Y-Y, HSIAO J-Y, CHANG C-T. Development of Building Fire Control and Management System in BIM Environment, Studies in Informatics and Control, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 15–24, Mar. 2013, 10.24846/v22i1y201302
17.
Choi J, Choi J, Kim I. Development of BIM-based evacuation regulation checking system for high-rise and complex buildings. Autom Constr. Oct. 2014;46:38–49. 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.005.
18.
Wang K-C et al. Jul., Application of Building Information Modeling in Designing Fire Evacuation ◻ a Case Study, Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC), 2014, 10.22260/isarc2014/0079
19.
Cheng M-Y, Chiu K-C, Hsieh Y-M, Yang I-T, Chou J-S. Development of BIM-Based Real-time Evacuation and Rescue System for Complex Buildings, Proceedings of the 33rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Jul. 2016, 10.22260/isarc2016/0120
20.
Kim K, Lee Y-C. Apr., Automated Generation of Daily Evacuation Paths in 4D BIM, Applied Sciences, 9, 9, p. 1789, 2019, 10.3390/app9091789
21.
Ma G, Wu Z. BIM-based building fire emergency management: Combining building users’ behavior decisions. Autom Constr. Jan. 2020;109:102975. 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102975.
22.
Wehbe R, Shahrour I. A BIM-Based Smart System for Fire Evacuation. Future Internet. Aug. 2021;13(9):221. 10.3390/fi13090221.
23.
Deng H, Ou Z, Zhang G, Deng Y, Tian M. Sensors. Jun. 2021;21(11):3851. 10.3390/s21113851. BIM and Computer Vision-Based Framework for Fire Emergency Evacuation Considering Local Safety Performance.
24.
Tongthong T, Nyimin T, Peansupap V. A System for Developing and Evaluating Fire Extinguisher Plans of Construction Projects in Virtual Environments, Journal of Information Technology in Construction, vol. 28, pp. 200–219, Apr. 2023, 10.36680/j.itcon.2023.010
25.
Ahn J, Han R. RescueMe: An Indoor Mobile Augmented-Reality Evacuation System by Personalized Pedometry, 2011 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference, Dec. 2011, 10.1109/apscc.2011.26
26.
Feng C, Kamat VR. A plane tracker for AEC-automation applications. Gerontechnology. Jun. 2012;11(2). 10.4017/gt.2012.11.02.327.00.
27.
Wang B, Li H, Rezgui Y, Bradley A, Ong HN. BIM Based Virtual Environment for Fire Emergency Evacuation, The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, pp. 1–22, 2014. 10.1155/2014/589016
28.
Cheng M-Y, Chiu K-C, Hsieh Y-M, Yang I-T, Chou J-S, Wu Y-W. BIM integrated smart monitoring technique for building fire prevention and disaster relief. Autom Constr. Dec. 2017;84:14–30. 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.027.
29.
Li F, Niu S, Wu, Song. A Fire Reconnaissance Robot Based on SLAM Position, Thermal Imaging Technologies, and AR Display, Sensors, vol. 19, no. 22, p. 5036, Nov. 2019, 10.3390/s19225036
30.
Nam GH, Seo HS, Kim MS, Gwon YK, Lee CM, Lee DM. AR-based Evacuation Route Guidance System in Indoor Fire Environment, 2019 25th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), Nov. 2019, 10.1109/apcc47188.2019.9026402
A
31.
Rokesh Maran B, Giridharan L, Krishnaveni R, Computing, SmartSystems J. Augmented Reality-based Indoor Navigation using Unity Engine,. 2023. 10.1109/icscss57650.2023.10169855
32.
Yoo S-J, Choi S-H. Indoor AR Navigation and Emergency Evacuation System Based on Machine Learning and IoT Technologies, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 21, pp. 20853–20868, Nov. 2022, 10.1109/jiot.2022.3175677
Total words in MS: 5358
Total words in Title: 13
Total words in Abstract: 197
Total Keyword count: 3
Total Images in MS: 21
Total Tables in MS: 6
Total Reference count: 32