A
Molecular Structure, Spectroscopic Characterization, and Nonlinear Optical Properties of 4-Hydroxycoumarin: A DFT Approach
16-digit ORCID identifier:
2DSB Campus, Kumaun University Nainital, Nainital-263001, India
Hema*1, Nisha Fatma2, Tara Bhatt3
1A.P.B. Govt. P. G. College, Agastyamuni-246421, India
3LBS Govt. P.G. College, Halduchaur (Nainital) Uttarakhand-263139, India
*Corresponding author: email: itsmehemaarya@gmail.com
contact: +91 8954823493
*Author- 0000-0001-5739-4475
Abstract
The present work focusses on computational analysis of the molecular structure, spectroscopic, natural bonding orbital (NBO) and the NLO (non-linear optical) properties of 4-hydroxycoumarin (4HC). With the help of computation DFT and TD-DFT study, the geometrical parameters, molecular orbitals (MOs), electrostatic potential, reactivity parameters and thermodynamic properties of 4-hydroxycumarine (4HC) was explored. Also, the absorption and emission spectra of 4HC in certain polar protic, polar aprotic and non-polar solvents and in gas phase were estimated using TD-DFT method. Theoretically calculated absorption in different solvent lies in 268 to 271 nm range and while the emission lies in 313 nm – 319 nm range depending on the environment. The natural bonding orbital (NBO) and the NLO (non-linear optical) properties including polarizability, first-order hyperpolarizability and dipole moment were also computed. The photophysical behaviour of 4HC is attributed to both specific and non-specific solute-solvent interactions. In this article, Pockel, dc-Kerr, ESHG (electric field induced second harmonic generation), degenerate four-wave mixing coefficients and nonlinear refractive indices from the first and second order hyperpolarizability calculations at Nd:YAG Laser wavelength is reported.
Keywords:
DFT and TD-DFT
Natural bonding orbital (NBO) and NLO (nonlinear optical) properties
A
1. Introduction:
Coumarins are the phytochemicals, which belongs to the family of benzopyrone, that display interesting pharmacological properties[1]. Coumarins possess anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, hepatoprotective, antiviral, anticarcinogenic and anticoagulant activities. They also constitute an important group of organic compounds that are used as bio/ chemo sensors, laser dyes, pesticides, additives to cosmetics, as optical brightening agents, fluorescent markers and dispersed fluorescent and laser dyes[27]. Due to their inherent physicochemical and photophysical characteristics such as reasonable relative ease of synthesis, coumarin derivatives have been extensively investigated for electronic and photonic applications such as charge-transfer complexes, laser dyes, fluorescence whiteners, solar energy collectors, and non-linear optical materials[8, 9]. Coumarins, in particular the hydroxycoumarins (HCs), are well-known natural products, but they also occur in areas as diverse as sun screen formulations, laser dyes, pesticides, etc[6].
Hydroxycoumarin has several advantages due to its versatile chemical structure and biological properties. 4-hydroxycoumarin is a key precursor in organic synthesis, used in various pharmacological and physiological applications and can be modified to create a wide range of bioactive compounds such as anticoagulants, anticancer agents, antimicrobial agents, anti-inflammatory agent. 4HC and its derivatives possess fluorescent properties and used as fluorescent probes, optical brighteners and laser dyes[10].
Due to the diverse application of hydroxycoumarins several researchers have studied the photophysical behaviour of positional substituents of hydroxy-coumarin. Aaron et al. [11] observed the absorption and emission of some hydroxy substituted coumarins including 4HC and evaluated the dipole moment of the ground and first excited singlet-state using Bakhshiev, Kawski-Chamma-Viallet, McRae, and Suppan correlations. The first excited singlet-state dipole moments of the coumarins are noticeably higher than the corresponding ground-state values, indicating a substantial redistribution of the w-electron densities resulting in a more polar excited state. Similarly S. Kumar et al. [12] also used Solvatochromic shift method to determine excited state dipole moment experimentally for a set of 7-hydroxycumarine derivatives. The increase in dipole moment upon excitation has been explained in terms of the nature of emitting state and resonance structure. Fatima et al. [13] studied the effect of solvent polarity on the HOMO-LUMO gap of 7-hydroxycumarine which is reflected on the absorption and emission spectra of the compound. Moriya et al. [14] studied 7-hydroxycumarin absorption and emission in different solvents. On the basis of the solvent-dependent fluorescence of the fluorophores, they classified solvents into several groups: hydroxylic solvents, non-hydroxylic solvents with low dielectric constants, and those with high dielectric constants. In the hydroxylic solvent, protonation, deprotonation, and tautomerization were the main reactions, while in the non-hydroxylic solvent the formation of hydrogen bonding and ion pairs was essential. Some research groups have performed Quantum chemical studies on to evaluate excited state geometries of several hydroxycoumarins[13, 14] Jacquemin et al. [15] have performed the configuration interaction singles (CIS) and TD-DFT study of excited-state structures of several hydroxy coumarin dyes. Cerón-Carrasco and his research group [16], investigated the solvatochromic effects on the optical spectra of a typical hydroxy coumarin using TDDFT approach, considering its enol, keto, anionic and cationic forms. It has been the solvent response due which there was large increase in dipole moment upon excitation while hydrogen bonds tune both absorption and emission energies.
A
In recent years many scholars studied NLO and NBO properties of many compounds [1719] as these properties are important for their practical uses. NLO properties like hyperpolarizability is curtail for various application including telecommunication, and optical computing, for materials used in optical devices. NBO properties provides a detailed understanding of molecular structure and electronic interactions. It helps identify charge transfer, hyperconjugative interactions and other factors that contribute to NLO behaviour. Organic materials are found to possess superior second order nonlinear optical properties compared to the more traditional inorganic materials. This property together with the inherent ultrafast response time and enumerable structural variations of organic materials have drawn sizeable amount of research interest in organic nonlinear optical (NLO) materials. Molecules that show asymmetric polarization induced by electron donor and acceptor groups in pi-electron conjugated molecules are candidates for electro optic and NLO applications, such as frequency doubling or second harmonic generation (SHG) [20]. Theoretical calculations, like DFT are used to predict these properties, helping researchers design and optimize materials for specific applications.
Considering the importance of 4HC as biological and photochemical active probe, it is necessary to investigate the information about its structural and photophysical behaviour. Therefore, this research work emphasizes on understanding the molecular properties of 4-hydroxycumarine and the effect of solvents on its electronic transitions. This study utilizes the density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) to determine the spectral behaviour and photophysical properties such as the natural bonding orbital (NBO) and the NLO (non-linear optical) properties (polarizability, first-order hyperpolarizability and dipole moment) of 4-hydroxycumarin.
2. Experimental and methods
2.1. Computational method details
Quantum-chemical calculations were performed using GAUSSIAN 09 programme package [21] and molecular structure of 4HC was drawn in GAUSS-VIEW 5.0 [22]. For the geometry optimization and to calculate the vertical transition and ground state dipole moment (
),
of 4-hydroxycoumarin (4HC), Density functional theory (DFT)[23] with the Hybrid Becke3-Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) functional [24, 25] and the standard basis set 6-311 + + G(d,p)[26], was opted. Excited state dipole moment was performed using a TD-DFT [27, 28] level of theory. Additionally, various molecular properties such as the energy of the Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital (HOMO) and of the Lowest Unoccupied Molecular orbital (LUMO), electrostatic potential (ESP) map, natural bonding orbital (NBO), nonlinear optical (NLO) properties and reactivity parameters. etc., have been estimated. Absorption and emission spectra were estimated with the TD-DFT approach with the hybrid exchange–correlation functional named CAM-B3LYP [29]. It combines the hybrid qualities of B3LYP and the long-range correction[30]. The solvent effect has been considered using an integral equation formalism version of the polarizable continuum model (IEF-PCM).
Non-linear optical (NLO) properties- static dipole polarizability (α), first-order hyperpolarizability (β) and second-order hyperpolarizability (γ) values of 4HC were calculated using density functional theory (DFT) at B3LYP/ 6-311 + + G(d,p) level of theory. The calculations of the frequency-dependent second hyperpolarizabilities for the (static) electric field induced second harmonic generation (ESHG) [γ (-2ω; ω, ω, 0)] of 4HC molecule by DFT method was performed by numerical differentiation of the second harmonic generation (SHG) [β (-2ω; ω, ω)] with respect to static electric fields. The DFT calculations of the ESHG second hyperpolarizabilities [γ (-2ω; ω, ω, 0)] of 4HC molecule was performed for the Nd:YAG laser frequency ω = 0.04282270 a.u. (corresponding to wavelength λ = 1064 nm).
3. Results and Discussion
a)
Molecular geometry and Thermodynamic functions:
Geometry optimization is an important step in computational chemistry that involves finding the most stable structure or lower-energy configuration of a molecule. The molecule 4-hydroxycumarine (4HC) was optimized by utilizing the DFT method with B3LYP functional and 6-311 + + G(d,p) basis set. The optimized geometric form corresponding to the local minima without imaginary frequency were confirmed using frequency calculations. Figure 1 represents the optimized structure of 4HC in gas phase. The bond lengths of 4HC (gas phase) in ground and excited state are tabulated in Table 1. In excited state, the bond O1-C5, O1-C12, C5-C8, C6-C9, C7-C10, C8-C11 get elongated while the bond C9-C12, O3-C12 and C10-C11 get shorten. Georgieva et al. [31] also reported the same behaviour of 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin (7H4MC) in the gas phase when it shows deprotonation behaviour. Mir [32] reported the ground state bond lengths of coumarin in gas phase and compared them with experimental values and found that they are in close agreement with each-other.
Fig. 1
Optimized molecular structure of 4HC using DFT/B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) theory.
Click here to Correct
Table 1
Optimized bond lengths of 4HC in the gas phase in the ground state (S0) and excited state (S1)
Bond
Bond-length (
)
R (
)
Bond-length (
)
R (
)
O1-C5
1.3614
1.2982
O1-C12
1.4006
1.7559
O2-C6
1.3516
1.3694
O2-H18
0.9650
0.9629
O3-C12
1.2032
1.1809
C4-C5
1.4039
1.4408
C4-C6
1.4463
1.4389
C4-C7
1.4048
1.3824
C5-C8
1.3951
1.4260
C6-C9
1.3572
1.4026
C7-C10
1.3853
1.4337
C7-H13
1.0823
1.0828
C8-C11
1.3877
1.4020
C8-H14
1.0826
1.0832
C9-C12
1.4471
1.3810
C9-H15
1.0830
1.0853
C10-C11
1.4013
1.3848
C10-H16
1.0831
1.0833
C11-H17
1.0839
1.0824
Fig. 2
Energy of HOMO and LUMO of 4HC calculated using DFT/ B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p).
Click here to Correct
The theoretically computed HOMO-LUMO energy levels are represented in Fig. 2. The HOMO, LUMO energies and band gap (ΔE) of the 4HC molecule are calculated as -6.82 eV, -2.08 eV and 4.75 eV respectively in the gas phase. Energy Gap increases with increasing solvents polarity. Charge density of 4HC in HOMO is located near oxygen of carbonyl group (C = O), whereas in LUMO charge density shifts to the center of adjacent rings of coumarin moiety.Mir et al. [32] reported the experimental band gap of coumarin in DMSO is 4.755 eV.
Thermodynamic properties are the characteristics that describe and ensure the thermal stability of a molecule. The thermodynamic parameters of 4HC such as total energy (
)), specific heat capacity (
), entropy (S) etc. were estimated using frequency calculations by employing B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) theory at 298 K in the ground state (GS) and tabulated in Table 2.
Table 2
Thermodynamic parameters of 4HC by employing B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) at 298 K
Thermodynamic Parameters (298 K)
4HC
SCF energy (kcal.mol-1)
359.19
Total energy, thermal (
) (kcal.mol-1)
87.90
Zero-point vibrational energy (
) (kcal.mol-1)
82.33
Entropy (S) (cal.mol-1.K-1 )
92.39
Specific heat (
) (cal.mol-1 K-1)
35.72
Vibrational energy (
) (kcal.mol-1)
86.13
Rotational constants (GHz)
 
A
1.61
B
0.88
C
0.57
Dipole moment (Debye)
 
-0.03
4.76
0.00
4.76
Table 3
Thermodynamic properties of 4HC at different temperatures calculated by DFT/B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) method
Temperature (K)
Total energy, thermal
(kcal.mol− 1)
Entropy (S)
(cal.mol− 1.K− 1 )
Specific heat
(cal.mol− 1.K− 1)
50
82.66
58.14
8.06
100
83.18
66.44
12.56
200
84.98
79.85
23.84
300
87.97
92.63
35.94
400
92.12
105.07
46.80
500
97.26
116.95
55.69
600
103.20
128.11
62.72
700
109.76
138.52
68.29
800
116.82
148.20
72.75
900
124.28
157.22
76.41
1000
132.08
165.65
79.43
The heat capacity at constant volume (
), total thermal energy (
) and entropy (S) at different temperatures have been calculated by the same approach to reveal the temperature dependency of these thermodynamic properties and are reported in Table 3. The temperature dependence of
for 4HC is shown in Fig. 3 along with polynomial (quadratic) fitting. Figure 3 shows that on increasing the temperature from 50 to 1000 K,
all are increasing because the molecular vibrational intensities increase with temperature. The obtained thermodynamic parameters vs. temperature were fitted using Quadratic formulas and the resulting fitted regression parameters (
) is all equal to 0.99 for all three parameters i.e.
. The corresponding fitting equations for 4HC are as follows,
Fig. 3
Correlation graph of thermodynamic properties of 4HC at different temperatures
Click here to Correct
b)
Global Reactivity Parameter:
Global reactivity parameters such as ionization potential (IP), chemical potential (µ), electron affinity (EA), electronegativity (χ), electrophilicity index (ω), electron-donating (ɷ−) and electron-accepting (ɷ+) power and hardness (η) are crucial in exploring the chemical reactivity of molecules in different surroundings and getting certain features associated with the reactions. Reactivity parameters are calculated using HOMO and LUMO energies as per Koopman’s theorem[33]. The value of ionization potential (IP) indicates that 4HC have electrophilic behavior while chemical potential (µ) indicate it is chemically active molecule.
Table 4
Global reactivity descriptors for 4HC calculated at TD-DFT/B3LYP/ 6-311 + + G (d, p) level of theory
Parameters (eV)
4HC
HOMO
-6.82
LUMO
-2.08
Energy gap (∆E)
4.74
Ionization Potential (IP) = -HOMO
6.82
Electron Affinity (EA) = -LUMO
2.08
Electronegativity (χ) =
4.45
Chemical Potential (µ) = - χ
-4.45
Chemical Hardness(η) =
2.37
Electrophilicity (ω) =
4.18
Electron accepting power (ɷ+) =
2.25
Electron donating power (ɷ−) =
4.45
Softness (σ) (eV− 1) =
0.21
c)
Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) map
The Molecular Electrostatic Potential (MEP) is an important concept in computation chemistry to analyze the nucleophilic and electrophilic sites of the molecule and to understand the reactivity of the molecule [34]. The MEP map is usually represented as a colour-coded map, where different colours represent different electrostatic potentials. Orange to red is the region with the most negative electrostatic potential, and sky blue to blue is the region with the most positive potential. The MEP map of 4HC was generated using the DFT/B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) level of theory and is shown in Fig. 4 with a color range of -7.871
a.u. to 7.871
a.u. In Fig. 4, the maximum yellow color region (maximum negative electrostatic potential) mainly around the oxygen atom (O3) of carbonyl group, it is electron-rich and preferred region for an electrophilic attack [35]. The blue color region; positive electrostatic potential is mainly over the hydrogen atom (H18) of OH group, which is electron- predominant area of a nucleophilic attack. The MEP map is very convenient in the exploration of biological recognition mechanisms and intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions [36].
Fig. 4
MEP map of 4HC obtained using DFT/ B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) in the gas phase
Click here to Correct
d)
Spectral Analysis: Solvatochromic Study
The effect of solvent polarity on the absorption and emission of the chosen was examined by calculating absorption and emission using IEFPCM model along with the TD-DFT calculations utilizing CAM-B3LYP functional at 6-311 + + G(d,p) basis. In the present study, water, ethanol (EtOH), methanol (MeOH), dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO), acetonitrile (ACN), tetrahydrofuran (THF), benzene, toluene, and cyclohexane solvents were selected for the spectral analysis. Theoretically calculated vertical transitions, corresponding excitation energy, oscillator strength (OS) and contributions in gas phase are summarized in Table 5. The strongest absorption band with S0→S1 as most probable transition appears at 269 nm in the gas phase.
Table 5
Excited-state properties - calculated electronic transition energies and corresponding oscillator strengths of the low-lying singlet excited states of 4HC using TD-DFT/ 6-311 + + G(d,p) level of theory.
Electronic Transition
Energy
(eV)
(nm)
Oscillator strength
Contribution
CI%
4.6125
269
0.1542
H→L
86%
5.1173
242
0.1418
H
1→L
69%
5.3437
232
0.0000
H
→L
71%
Fig. 5
Theoretically calculated absorption spectra of 4HC in different solvents
Click here to Correct
Figure 5 displays the simulated UV–Vis spectra of 4HC in the selected solvents as well as in the gas phase. The main electronic transition band of 4HC in the UV–vis region is found to be between 268 nm to 271 nm depending on the solvents. The absorption spectra depend on the polarity of the solvent used.
To authenticate the computed spectral properties, the theoretically calculated results were compared with the previously reported work done by Aaron et al. [11]. They reported that the ground state dipole moment of 4HC is 5.0 D while that of excited state is 7.04 D and 4HC shows multiband absorption in the region 260–314 nm in different solvents. In all solvents there is a peak around 290 nm. The theoretically calculated results correlate well with the experimental results.
For the emission spectra, the optimization of the lowest excited state (S1) of 4HC in the gas phase and in solvents was performed using the TD-DFT approach. The obtained results are listed in Table 6. The change in transition dipole moments (
) between the excited singlet and ground state of 4HC in various solvents were calculated using the following relation [37] and are tabulated in Table 6.
Where
is the maximum energy of absorption in cm-1 and
is the oscillator strength.
The transition dipole moment dictates whether a transition between two quantum states is possible and, if so, how likely (intense) that transition will be. It quantifies the coupling between a molecule (or atom) and the electric field of incident electromagnetic radiation (light). a transition dipole moment of 2.9⁓3.0 D signifies a strong, highly allowed spectroscopic transition due to a large, effective quantum mechanical change in charge distribution.
The wavelength of emission maximum was found to depend on the solvent polarity as represented in Table 6 and vary from 311 to 319 nm on increasing the solvent polarity. In gaseous phase it is found to be 312 nm. The first excited singlet-state dipole moment of 4HC in different solvents is higher than the corresponding ground-state values (Table 6), indicating a substantial redistribution of the π-electron densities resulting in a more polar excited state.
Aaron et al. [11] reported the experimental emission of 4HC at 370 nm, 390 nm and 395 nm in ethanol, ACN and in DMSO respectively. The emission peak calculated in the present work shows a variation from the experimentally reported results. The variation in experimental and theoretical result of emission spectra may be because of experimental observations depend on various physical parameters such as solute-solvent interaction, temperature of the surroundings, concentration of solute and hydrogen bonding ability of solvents, etc., whereas in computational calculations solute–solvent interactions are not considered.
The theoretically calculated Stokes-Shift is related to solvent polarity function. For present study Lippert-Mataga polarity function (
) [38] was utilized.
Where ε being the static dielectric constant and n the refractive index of the solvent. The larger the polarity of solvent, larger the Stokes-shift i.e. spectra show red shift with increasing polarity (Fig. 6).
Table 6
Computationally calculated spectral parameters of 4HC in the ground and excited-state in the gas phase and in different solvents
Solvents
Ground State
(D)
Excited State
 
(D)
HOMO (eV)
LUMO (eV)
ΔE (eV)
(nm)
(nm)
Excitation energy (eV)
Oscillator strength
f
Transition Dipole moment
(ns)
LHE
Stokes shift (cm-1)
Cyclohexane
5.5316
5.6244
-8.22
-0.80
7.41
271
313
4.58
0.2400
2.92
4.6
0.42
5003.94
Benzene
5.6381
5.7532
-8.22
-0.80
7.42
271
313
4.58
0.2530
2.99
4.4
0.44
4998.72
Toluene
5.6766
5.8001
-8.22
-0.80
7.42
271
314
4.58
0.2529
2.99
4.4
0.44
5021.82
THF
6.3868
6.7016
-8.24
-0.81
7.43
269
317
4.60
0.2469
2.95
4.4
0.43
5545.34
Acetonitrile
6.7386
7.1855
-8.26
-0.82
7.44
268
319
4.62
0.2444
2.94
4.4
0.43
5876.54
DMSO
6.7628
7.2176
-8.26
-0.82
7.44
269
319
4.61
0.2583
3.02
4.2
0.45
5828.17
Methanol
6.7291
7.1729
-8.26
-0.82
7.44
268
319
4.62
0.2413
2.92
4.5
0.43
5883.53
Ethanol
6.6950
7.1277
-8.25
-0.81
7.44
269
318
4.62
0.2469
2.95
4.4
0.43
5822.43
Water
6.7944
7.2595
-8.26
-0.82
7.44
268
319
4.62
0.2433
2.93
4.4
0.43
5938.24
The fluorophores that possess charge transfer characteristics are very useful in optoelectronic devices and are greatly influenced by the radiative (or excited state) lifetime. It is expected that fluorophores with considerably longer lifetimes will demonstrate effective electron injection and charge transfer. The radiative lifetime of the fluorophore is calculated by using the Eq. [39]-
where
is the absorption wavenumber and
is the oscillator strength.
The radiative life-time of 4HC in different solvent vary from 4.2 to 4.6 ns. This result is close to that reported by Silva et al. [40], the 4-HC has lifetime of the order of ns (0.026 ns to 10 ns).
Light harvesting efficiency (LHE) predicts the ability of organic compounds to absorb photons and then inject photoexcited electrons into the conduction band of semiconductors [39]. LHE is estimated using the equation
The calculated values of LHE of 4HC (using theoretical values of OS) in different solvents have been found in the range of 0.42–0.45. The Light Harvesting Efficiency (LHE) of a molecule significantly influences the performance of organic solar cells (OSCs). A higher LHE directly increases the short-circuit current density (JSC), which ultimately enhances the overall efficiency of the device[4143]. For the molecule 4HC, the experimentally obtained LHE value in water is approximately 0.43. This relatively high LHE suggests that 4HC is an efficient light absorber, capable of converting 43% of the absorbed light energy into usable excited states that facilitate effective charge transfer. This characteristic makes 4HC a promising component for highly efficient OSCs.
Fig. 6
Lippert Mataga correlation between Stoke′s shift (calculated by TD-DFT) and solvent polarity function (F(ε,n))
Click here to Correct
e)
Non-linear optical (NLO) properties: -
After geometry optimization, static dipole polarizability (α), first-order hyperpolarizability (β) and second-order hyperpolarizability (γ) values of 4HC was calculated using density functional theory (DFT) at B3LYP/ 6-311 + + G(d,p) level of theory. The value of hyperpolarizability is a measure of NLO activity of the molecular system. It is associated with intra-molecular charge transfer that is attributed to electron cloud movement through π-conjugated framework of electrons. The electron cloud is capable of interacting with an external electric field and is found to increase the asymmetric electronic distribution in either or both the ground and excited states, thus leading to an increased optical non-linearity [44]. First hyperpolarizability is a third rank tensor that can be described by a 3 ×3 × 3 matrix. The 27 components of the 3D matrix can be reduced to 10 components due to the Kleinman symmetry[45]. The components of hyperpolarizability are useful to understand charge delocalization in the molecule.The molecular polarizability and hyperpolarizability tensors related to the dipole moment induced in an isolated molecule by the applied electric field is given by [46],
where,
are the indices referring to the molecular coordinate system,
is polarizability,
and
are the first- and second-order hyperpolarizability and
static dipole moment.
The polarizability
, first-order hyperpolarizability (β) and second order hyperpolarizability
are calculated using the x, y and z components from following equations [44, 4751]-
Where,
Frequency dependent first-order hyperpolarizability(β
)
Where,
Second-order hyperpolarizability (γ)
The nonlinear optical properties such as electro optic Pockels effect (EOPE)
, the Second Harmonic Generation of first hyperpolarizability (SHG)
, static
, electric field induced second harmonic generation (ESHG) and dc Kerr effect static second hyperpolarizability are reported in Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9. Using the ESHG γ ( -2ω; ω, ω, 0) and dc Kerr static second hyperpolarizability γ (-ω; ω,0,0), the degenerate four wave mixing (DFWM) γ (-ω; ω, -ω, ω) and frequency dependent quadratic refractive index (
) are calculated.
frequency dependent quadratic refractive index (
)[52]-
Table 7
Polarizability (α) and first-order static hyperpolarizability (β) of 4HC computed using DFT/ B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) level of theory
Polarizability
α (a.u.)
4HC
First-order static hyperpolarizability
β (a.u.)
4HC
145.93
-182.15
23.60
-40.56
145.26
199.69
0.00
105.26
0.00
0.00
58.86
0.00
(esu)
17.29
0.00
  
46.02
  
51.22
  
0.00
  
(esu)
12.25
Table 8
Frequency dependent First-order hyperpolarizability β: electro optic Pockels effect (EOPE)
, the second harmonic generation of first hyperpolarizability (SHG)
of 4HC
Frequency dependent First-order hyperpolarizability
β (a.u.)
Frequency dependent First-order hyperpolarizability
β (a.u.)
-194.73
-235.23
-41.98
-50.96
211.71
0.00
0.00
-28.92
0.00
239.63
49.38
0.00
-36.96
237.61
211.25
115.77
109.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
55.13
53.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
60.27
50.15
56.52
55.54
61.60
0.00
0.00
(esu)
10.72
(esu)
12.05
Table 9
Some selected components of the static γ (-ω; ω,0,0) and frequency-dependent second order hyperpolarizability: dc Kerr static second hyperpolarizability- γ (-ω; ω,0,0) and ESHG- γ (-2ω; ω,0,0) of 4HC
second-order hyperpolarizability γ (a.u.)
4HC
dc Kerr static second hyperpolarizability
γ (-ω; ω,0,0)
ESHG
γ ( -2ω; ω, ω, 0)
46088.10
51378.00
64356.90
19404.90
21219.40
24619.00
14339.20
15440.20
16893.30
11977.30
13513.00
16715.83
7746.31
8579.28
10017.99
6698.15
7369.44
8437.88
26535.14
29392.21
35242.52
(esu)
13.36
14.80
17.75
The polarizabilities and hyper polarizabilities are calculated in atomic units (a.u.), the calculated values have been converted into electrostatic units (esu) (α: 1a.u.=
esu, β: 1 a.u.=
esu, γ: 1 a.u.=
esu)[51]. The static hyperpolarizability (β) and polarizability(α) are presented in Table 7. The frequency dependent first order hyperpolarizability (β) in Table 8 and second order hyperpolarizability is presented in Table 9.
A
The magnitude of the molecular hyperpolarizability (β) is one of important key factors in a NLO system. Urea is one of the prototypical molecules used in the study of the NLO properties of molecular systems and frequently used as a threshold value for comparative purposes. The computed first hyperpolarizability(βstatic) of 4HC molecule is 12.25
cm5/esu by B3LYP methods. Theoretically, the first-order hyperpolarizability(β) of 4HC molecule is higher than the magnitude of urea (β of urea is 4.5
cm5/esu reported by Ledoux et al. [53]). Thus, this molecule might serve as a prospective building block for NLO materials. The dynamic γstatic values for the title molecules is 17.75
esu slightly higher than the cubic hyperpolarizability of para-nitroaniline (p-NA) (γ p-NA = 12.71×10-36 esu) given in [54]. Thus, 4HC shows good NLO response. The degenerate four wave mixing (DFWM) γ (-ω; ω, -ω, ω) and frequency dependent quadratic refractive index (
) values are 32294.67 au and
respectively for 4HC.
Nonlinear refraction is a key nonlinear optical mechanism in isotropic media, including all gases, liquids, and a large class of solids. In dielectric media, nonlinear refraction causes an intensity-dependent increase of the index of refraction, which gives rise to spectral broadening and is the basis for nearly all femtosecond pulse compression mechanisms[52].
f)
Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis
Natural bonding orbital (NBO) study provides an appropriate framework for investigating the transfer of charge and intra- or inter-molecular bonding in molecular systems[55]. The stable interaction between donor and acceptor involves the electron density delocalization of occupied and unoccupied NBOs [44]. The NBO analysis for 4HC at DFT/B3LYP/6-311G++(d,p) level of theory was performed in order to elucidate the conjugation, hyper-conjugation and delocalization of electron density within the molecule. The bond type, occupancy, electron density, hybridization and their corresponding characters of NBOs for 4HC are tabulated in Table 10. The atom O is considered to be highly electro-negative as the Pc (polarization coefficient square) value is large. For example, the NBO σ(O1-C5) is established by the contribution of 67.86% of the electron density of the O1 and 32.14% of the C5 atom. This NBO is originated by the connection of sp1.87 (PC = 0.82 and p-character: 65.09%) of the O1 atom and sp3.14 (PC = 0.57 and p-character: 75.65%) of the C5 atom.
The stabilization energy of a molecule in NBO study is calculated using second-order perturbation theory and is defined by the given equation:
where,
signifies stabilization energy,
symbolizes orbital occupancy of the donor; (
) and
is the off diagonal and diagonal NBO Fock matrix elements[56]. The more the value of
, the stronger is the association between electron acceptor and donor moieties and a higher degree of conjugation throughout the entire molecular system[17, 57].
The stabilization energy for few donor-acceptor interactions was tabulated in Table 11. The most significant NBOs are π(C6-C9) →π*(O3-C12), LP(O3) →π*(O1-C12), LP(O2) →π*(C6-C9) with stabilization energy 24.14, 38.23, 34.46 Kcal/mol respectively. When the donor–acceptor interactions arise within the molecular framework, the occupancies and energies of donor orbitals reduce and charge transfer interactions occur. The NBOs interactions probably arise because of the delocalization of π electrons from one NBO to another or delocalization of lone pair charge density and hence charge transfer interactions occur within the 4HC molecule, which stabilizes the molecular framework.
Table 10
Bond type, occupancy, electron density, p character of significant natural atomic hybrid of the NBO of 4HC
Bond (A-B)
Occupancy
EDA (%)
EDB (%)
Hybrid
Atom
p (%)
σ(O1-C5)
1.99
67.86
32.14
0.82sp1.87+0.57sp3.14
O1
65.09
     
C5
75.65
σ(O1-C12)
1.99
70.11
29.89
0.84sp2.29+0.55sp3.06
O1
69.58
     
C12
75.13
σ(O2-C6)
1.99
66.98
33.02
0.81sp1.82+0.58sp2.99
O2
64.54
     
C6
74.81
σ(O2-H18)
1.99
74.28
25.72
0.86sp3.81+0.51sp0.00
O2
79.13
     
H18
0.12
σ(O3-C12)
1.99
64.45
35.55
0.80sp1.43+0.57sp1.87
O3
58.84
     
C12
65.04
π(O3-C12)
1.98
69.32
30.68
0.83p1.00+0.55p1.00
O3
99.87
     
C12
99.54
σ(C4-C5)
1.97
50.98
49.02
0.71sp2.08+0.70sp1.66
C4
67.49
     
C5
62.45
π(C4-C5)
1.61
55.16
44.84
0.74p1.00+0.67p1.00
C4
99.98
     
C5
99.97
σ(C4-C6)
1.97
50.68
49.32
0.71sp2.18+0.70sp1.86
C4
68.48
     
C6
65.05
σ(C4-C7)
1.97
52.19
47.81
0.72sp1.78+0.69sp1.92
C4
63.98
     
C7
65.74
σ(C5-C8)
1.98
51.12
48.88
0.71sp1.63+0.70sp1.94
C5
61.90
     
C8
65.99
σ(C6-C9)
1.98
50.65
49.35
0.71sp1.51+0.70sp1.69
C6
60.10
     
C7
62.76
π(C6-C9)
1.81
42.03
57.97
0.65p1.00+0.76p1.00
C6
99.91
     
C9
99.94
σ(C7-C10)
1.98
50.44
49.56
0.71sp1.83+0.70sp1.79
C7
63.27
     
C10
64.18
π(C7-C10)
1.69
48.30
51.70
0.69p1.00+0.71p1.00
C7
99.95
     
C10
99.96
σ(C7-H13)
1.98
61.29
38.71
0.78sp2.43+0.62s1.00
C7
70.85
     
H13
0.05
σ(C8-C11)
1.98
50.51
49.49
0.71sp1.73+0.70sp1.80
C8
63.40
     
C11
64.31
π(C8-C11)
1.68
51.97
48.03
0.72p1.00+0.70p1.00
C8
99.95
     
C11
99.95
σ(C8-H14)
1.98
61.37
38.63
0.78sp2.39+0.70s1.00
C8
70.47
     
H14
0.05
σ(C9-C12)
1.98
51.47
48.53
0.71sp2.09+0.70sp1.48
C9
67.66
     
C12
59.59
σ(C9-H15)
1.97
61.16
38.84
0.78sp2.27+0.62s1.00
C9
69.44
     
H15
0.05
σ(C10-C11)
1.98
49.94
50.06
0.71sp1.83+0.71sp1.79
C10
64.64
     
C11
64.17
σ(C10-H16)
1.98
60.62
39.38
0.78sp2.46+0.70s1.00
C10
71.05
     
H16
0.05
σ(C11-H17)
1.98
60.58
39.42
0.78sp2.50+0.70s1.00
C11
71.39
     
H17
0.05
LP (O1)
1.96
  
sp1.91
O1
65.16
LP (O1)
1.74
  
p1.00
O1
99.94
LP (O2)
1.98
  
sp1.28
O2
56.13
LP (O2)
1.84
  
p1.00
O2
99.94
LP (O3)
1.98
  
sp0.69
O3
40.98
LP (O3)
1.83
  
p1.00
O3
99.87
Table 11
Stabilization energies for some significant donor acceptor interactions of 4HC
Donor NBO (i)
Acceptor NBO (j)
E2 (kcal/mol)
E(j)-E(i) (a.u.)
F(i,j) (a.u.)
π(C4-C5 )
π*(C6 - C9)
19.14
0.28
0.068
π(C4-C5)
π*(C7-C10)
19.83
0.30
0.070
π(C4-C5)
π*(C8-C11)
15.51
0.30
0.062
π(C6-C9)
π*(O3-C12)
24.14
0.31
0.080
π(C6-C9)
π*(C4-C5)
9.02
0.31
0.050
π(C7-C10)
π*(C4-C5)
17.62
0.27
0.064
π(C7-C10)
π*(C8-C11)
21.35
0.28
0.070
π(C8-C11)
π*(C4-C5)
23.11
0.27
0.073
π (C8-C11)
π*(C7-C10)
17.20
0.29
0.063
CR (O3)
RY*(C12)
6.88
20.01
0.332
LP(O1)
π*(C4-C5)
6.51
1.09
0.075
LP(O1)
π*(O3-C12)
33.00
0.35
0.097
LP(O1)
π*(C4-C5)
31.19
0.35
0.097
LP(O2)
π*(C6-C9)
6.12
1.23
0.078
LP(O2)
π*(C6-C9)
34.46
0.37
0.103
LP(O3)
RY*(C12)
17.36
1.87
0.161
LP(O3)
π*(O1-C12)
38.23
0.55
0.131
LP(O3)
π*(C9-C12)
16.00
0.71
0.098
π*(C4-C5)
π*(C7-C10)
197.24
0.01
0.079
π*(C4-C5)
π*(C8-C11)
262.59
0.01
0.083
g)
Application of the study:
The detailed analysis of 4HC's structural, electronic, and optical properties suggests its promising use in many fields. The relatively high LHE value is a crucial indicator that 4HC can efficiently absorb photons and convert light energy, making it a good candidate for active materials in Organic Solar Cells (OSCs). The combination of its lifetime and band gap energy suggests that 4HC can be engineered to manage charge carriers effectively, making it suitable not only for solar cells but also for wide bandgap power devices where stable, high-efficiency energy conversion is required. The molecule exhibits properties favorable for altering light signals, which is the basis for NLO applications. The study's finding that 4HC has favorable Nonlinear Optical (NLO) parameters suggests it can be used in devices that require a non-linear response to intense light. These applications typically include optical switching, optical data storage, frequency doubling, and other advanced photonics technologies. The NBO analysis confirmed that charge transfer interactions contribute significantly to stabilizing the molecular system. This stability is desirable in functional materials where robust and repeatable performance is essential, especially in electronic or optoelectronic devices.
The small energy gap between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) suggests that 4HC is a reactive molecule, which can be beneficial in certain catalytic or synthetic pathways. The MEP map showing the O3 oxygen atom as an electron-rich center pinpoints the preferred region for electrophilic attack. This information is invaluable for chemists attempting to synthesize novel derivatives of 4HC with tailored properties.
4. Conclusion:
The molecular structure of 4-hydroxycumarine (4HC) was thoroughly investigated using DFT and TD-DFT theories to evaluate its potential across several advanced technological fields. The significant structural, molecular and thermodynamic parameters were obtained. The small energy gap suggests that it is a reactive molecule. MEP map shows that oxygen atom (O3) is electron-rich and it is a preferred region for an electrophilic attack. Depending on the medium, the calculated absorption maxima of 4HC lies in the range 268–271 nm and emission maxima in the range of and 313–319 nm, respectively.
Key findings indicate that 4HC is highly promising for optoelectronic applications, primarily due to its relatively high Light Harvesting Efficiency (LHE) and favorable electronic parameters (lifetime and band gap energy), making it a strong candidate for active materials in Organic Solar Cells (OSCs) and wide bandgap power devices. Furthermore, the calculated Nonlinear Optical (NLO) parameters suggest its utility in advanced photonics technologies like optical switching and data storage. Chemically, the molecule is predicted to be reactive due to a small HOMO-LUMO energy gap, and the MEP map identifies the O3 oxygen atom as the electron-rich site for electrophilic attack, providing crucial guidance for the synthesis of new derivatives. Finally, NBO analysis confirmed that significant charge transfer interactions stabilize the molecular system, which is vital for robust performance in functional electronic and optoelectronic devices.
Declarations
Ethical Approval:
Not applicable
A
Funding:
This research did not receive funding.
A
Acknowledgement
One of the authors, Dr. Hema is thankful to Prof. Archana Gupta, HOD, Department of Applied Physics, MJP Rohilkhand University Bareilly, India for the Gaussian 09 facilities.
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests:
Authors had no conflict of interest.
Availability of data and material
(data transparency): Supplementary file.
Code availability:
Gaussian and Gauss-view programmes are used for present work.
Gaussian site: https://gaussian.com/
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material
A
Author Contribution
Hema: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation. Nisha Fatma: data curation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Tara Bhatt: Formal analysis, review & editing.
References:
1.
Yusufzai SK, Khan MS, Sulaiman O, Osman H, Lamjin DN (2018) Molecular docking studies of coumarin hybrids as potential acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, monoamine oxidase A/B and β-amyloid inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease. Chem Cent J 12:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-018-0497-z
2.
Abdel-Mottaleb MSA, El-Sayed BA, Abo-Aly MM, El-Kady MY (1989) Fluorescence-properties and excited state interactions of 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin laser dye. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 46:379–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1010-6030(89)87054-6
3.
Cao D, Liu Z, Verwilst P, Koo S, Jangjili P, Kim JS, Lin W (2019) Coumarin-Based Small-Molecule Fluorescent Chemosensors. Chem Rev 119:10403–10519. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00145
4.
Jurd L, Corse J, King AD, Bayne H, Mihara K (1971) Antimicrobial properties of 6,7-dihydroxy-, 7,8-dihydroxy-, 6-hydroxy- and 8-hydroxycoumarins. Phytochemistry 10:2971–2974. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97334-5
5.
Kostova IN, Nikolov NM, Chipilska LN (1993) Antimicrobial properties of some hydroxycoumarins and Fraxinus ornus bark extracts. J Ethnopharmacol 39:205–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(93)90037-6
6.
Seixas De Melo J, Fernandes PF (2001) Spectroscopy and photophysics of 4- and 7-hydroxycoumarins and their thione analogs. J Mol Struct 565–566:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2860(01)00458-6
7.
Matolcsy G, Nádasy M, Andriska V (1989) Pesticide Chemistry. Elsevier Science
8.
Pandey N, Gahlaut R, Arora P, Joshi NK, Joshi HC, Pant S (2014) Study of dipole moments of some coumarin derivatives. J Mol Struct 1061:175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLSTRUC.2013.11.003
9.
Mir FA, Rehman S u, Asokan K, Khan SH, Bhat GM (2014) Optical, DC and AC electrical investigations of 4-hydroxy coumarin molecule as an organic Schottky diode. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 25:1258–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-014-1718-4
10.
Abdou MM, El-Saeed RA, Bondock S (2019) Recent advances in 4-hydroxycoumarin chemistry. Part 1: Synthesis and reactions. Arab J Chem 12:88–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARABJC.2015.06.012
11.
Aaron J-J, Buna M, Parkanyi C, Antonious MS, Tine A, Cisse L (1995) Quantitative treatment of the effect of solvent on the electronic absorption and fluorescence spectra of substituted coumarins: Evaluation of the first excited singlet-state dipole moments. J Fluoresc 5:337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01152560
12.
Kumar S, Rao VC, Rastogi RC (2001) Excited-state dipole moments of some hydroxycoumarin dyes using an efficient solvatochromic method based on the solvent polarity parameter, ETN. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 57:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(00)00330-9
13.
Fatima S, Mansha A, Asim S (2022) Computational Studies Followed by Effect of Solvent Polarity and Salts on HOMO–LUMO Gap of 7-Hydroxy Coumarine Notabally Reflected by Absorption and Emission Spectra. J Fluoresc 32:2351–2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-022-03031-z
14.
Moriya T (1988) Excited-State Reactions of Coumarins. VII. The Solvent-Dependent Fluorescence of 7-Hydroxycoumarins. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 61:1873–1886. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.61.1873
15.
Jacquemin D, Perpète EA, Assfeld X, Scalmani G, Frisch MJ, Adamo C (2007) The geometries, absorption and fluorescence wavelengths of solvated fluorescent coumarins: A CIS and TD-DFT comparative study. Chem Phys Lett 438:208–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPLETT.2007.03.008
16.
Cerón-Carrasco JP, Fanuel M, Charaf-Eddin A, Jacquemin D (2013) Interplay between solvent models and predicted optical spectra: A TD-DFT study of 7-OH-coumarin. Chem Phys Lett 556:122–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPLETT.2012.11.075
17.
Husain S, Pandey N, Fatma N, Pant S, Mehata MS (2024) Quantum Computational and Spectroscopic Investigation of 3-aminosalicylic Acid. J Fluoresc 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10895-024-03781-Y/FIGURES/9
18.
Pandey N, Mehata MS, Pant S, Tewari N (2021) Structural, Electronic and NLO properties of 6-aminoquinoline: A DFT/TD-DFT study. J Fluoresc 31:1719–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-021-02788-z
19.
Prakasam M, Anbarasan PM (2016) Second order hyperpolarizability of triphenylamine based organic sensitizers: a first principle theoretical study. RSC Adv 6:75242–75250. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra11200e
20.
Zyss J, Nicoud J-F (1996) Status and perspective for molecular nonlinear optics: from crystals to polymers and fundamentals to applications. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 1:533–546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0286(96)80069-6
21.
M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, X. Li, M. Caricato, A. Marenich, J. Bloino, B. G. Janesko, R. Gomperts, B. Mennucci, H. P. Hratchian, J. V. Ort 2016. (2016) Gaussian 09, Revision A.02,
22.
Frisch A, Hratchian HP, Dennington RD, Keith TA, Millam J, Nielsen B, Holder AJ, Hiscocks J (2009) GaussView Version 5.0. 8. Gaussian, Wallingford
23.
Parr RG (1980) Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules BT - Horizons of Quantum Chemistry. In: Fukui K, Pullman B (eds). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 5–15
24.
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B 37:785–789. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785
25.
Becke AD (1993) Densityfunctional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. Cit J Chem Phys 98:5648. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913
26.
Nagy B, Jensen F (2017) Basis Sets in Quantum Chemistry. Rev. Comput. Chem. 93–149
27.
Bartolotti LJ (1982) Time-dependent Kohn-Sham density-functional theory. Phys Rev A 26:2243–2244. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.26.2243
28.
Marques MAL, Maitra NT, Nogueira FMS, Gross EKU, Rubio A (2012) Fundamentals of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. Springer Berlin Heidelberg
29.
Tawada Y, Tsuneda T, Yanagisawa S, Yanai T, Hirao K (2004) A long-range-corrected time-dependent density functional theory. J Chem Phys 120:8425–8433. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1688752
30.
Yanai T, Tew DP, Handy NC (2004) A new hybrid exchange–correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem Phys Lett 393:51–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.011
31.
Georgieva I, Trendafilova N, Aquino A, Lischka H (2005) Excited State Properties of 7-Hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin in the Gas Phase and in Solution. A Theoretical Study. J Phys Chem A 109:11860–11869. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0524025
32.
Mir MA (2023) DFT, Hirshfeld Surface, Molecular Docking and Drug Likeness Studies of Medicinally Important Coumarin Molecule. Arab J Sci Eng 48:7445–7462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07476-z
33.
Koopmans T (1934) Über die Zuordnung von Wellenfunktionen und Eigenwerten zu den Einzelnen Elektronen Eines Atoms. Physica 1:104–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(34)90011-2
34.
Nivetha GF, Vetrivelan V, Muthu S, Prasath M (2023) Adsorption behavior, different green solvent effect and surface enhanced Raman spectra (SERS) investigation on inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 by antineoplastic drug Carmofur with silver/gold/platinum loaded silica nanocomposites: A combined computational analysis and molecular modelling approach. Results Chem 6:101096. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RECHEM.2023.101096
35.
Alam MJ, Ahmad S (2015) FTIR, FT-Raman, UV–visible spectra and quantum chemical calculations of allantoin molecule and its hydrogen bonded dimers. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 136:961–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2014.09.119
36.
Fatma N, Mehata MS, Pandey N, Pant S (2021) Experimental and theoretical interpretations of spectral behavior of 6-methoxyflavone. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 404:112945. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPHOTOCHEM.2020.112945
37.
Asiri AM, Sobahi TR, Osman OI, Khan SA (2017) Photophysical investigation of (D-π-A) DMHP dye: Dipole moments, photochemical quantum yield and fluorescence quantum yield, by solvatochromic shift methods and DFT studies. J Mol Struct 1128:636–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLSTRUC.2016.08.081
38.
Mataga N, Kaifu Y, Koizumi M (1956) Solvent Effects upon Fluorescence Spectra and the Dipolemoments of Excited Molecules. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 29:465–470. https://doi.org/10.1246/BCSJ.29.465
39.
Bibi S, Farooq F, Shafiq-ur-Rehman, Bai FQ, Zhang H-X (2021) DFT and TD-DFT studies of phenothiazine based derivatives as fluorescent materials for semiconductor applications. Mater Sci Semicond Process 134:106036. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.106036
40.
Pinto da Silva L, Simkovitch R, Huppert D, Esteves da Silva JCG (2017) Combined experimental and theoretical study of the photochemistry of 4- and 3-hydroxycoumarin. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 338:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPHOTOCHEM.2017.01.032
41.
Zubair I, Ahmad Kher R, Javaid Akram S, El-Badry YA, Umar Saeed M, Iqbal J (2022) Tuning the optoelectronic properties of indacenodithiophene based derivatives for efficient photovoltaic applications: A DFT approach. Chem Phys Lett 793:139459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2022.139459
42.
Saeed U, Bousbih R, Mahal A, Majdi H, Jahan N, Jabir MS, Soliman MS, Ayub AR, Elsayed NH, Ali S, Khera RA, Waqas M (2024) Engineering of asymmetric A1-D1-A2-D2-A1 type non-fullerene acceptors of 4T2CSi–4F derivatives to enhance photovoltaic properties: A DFT study. J Phys Chem Solids 192:112094. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2024.112094
43.
Calogero G, Yum JH, Sinopoli A, Di Marco G, Grätzel M, Nazeeruddin MK (2012) Anthocyanins and betalains as light-harvesting pigments for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy 86:1563–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.02.018
44.
Jayareshmi D, Robert HM, Aruldhas D (2021) Elucidation of the structure, spectroscopic techniques and quantum chemical investigations on nonlinear optical material 2–hydroxy-5-methylbenzaldehyde. J Mol Struct 1238:130426. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLSTRUC.2021.130426
45.
Kleinman DA (1962) Nonlinear Dielectric Polarization in Optical Media. Phys Rev 126:1977–1979. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.126.1977
46.
Norman P, Ruud K (2006) Microscopic Theory of Nonlinear Optics BT - Non-Linear Optical Properties of Matter: From Molecules to Condensed Phases. In: Papadopoulos MG, Sadlej AJ, Leszczynski J (eds). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 1–49
47.
Thanthiriwatte KS, Nalin de Silva KM (2002) Non-linear optical properties of novel fluorenyl derivatives—ab initio quantum chemical calculations. J Mol Struct THEOCHEM 617:169–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-1280(02)00419-0
48.
Begam Elavarasi S, Deepa Mariam, Ummal Momeen M, Hu J, Guin M (2019) Effect of fluorination on bandgap, first and second order hyperpolarizabilities in lithium substituted adamantane: A time dependent density functional theory. Chem Phys Lett 715:310–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPLETT.2018.11.034
49.
Avcı D, Tamer Ö, Atalay Y (2016) Solvatochromic effect on UV–vis absorption and fluorescence emission spectra, second- and third-order nonlinear optical properties of dicyanovinyl-substituted thienylpyrroles: DFT and TDDFT study. J Mol Liq 220:495–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.05.023
50.
Tarazkar M, Romanov DA, Levis RJ (2015) Theoretical study of second-order hyperpolarizability for nitrogen radical cation. J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys 48:. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/48/9/094019
51.
Shelton DP, Rice JE (1994) Measurements and calculations of the hyperpolarizabilities of atoms and small molecules in the gas phase. Chem Rev 94:3–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00025a001
52.
Bree C, Demircan A, Steinmeyer G (2010) Method for Computing the Nonlinear Refractive Index via Keldysh Theory. IEEE J Quantum Electron 46:433–437. https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.2009.2031599
53.
Ledoux I, Zyss J (1982) Influence of the molecular environment in solution measurements of the Second-order optical susceptibility for urea and derivatives. Chem Phys 73:203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(82)85161-6
54.
Nalwa HS, Seizo M (2020) Nonlinear Optics of Organic Molecules and Polymers. CRC Press
55.
Reed AE, Curtiss LA, Weinhold F (1988) Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint. Chem Rev 88:899–926. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00088a005
56.
Soliman SM, Kassem TS, Badr AMA, Abu Youssef MA, Assem R (2014) Quantum chemical study, spectroscopic investigations, NBO and HOMO–LUMO analyses of 3-aminoquinoline (3AQ) and [Ag(3AQ)2(TCA)] complex (TCA = Trichloroacetate). J Mol Struct 1074:168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLSTRUC.2014.05.077
57.
Pandey N, Mehata MS, Pant S, Tewari N (2021) Structural, Electronic and NLO Properties of 6-aminoquinoline: A DFT/TD-DFT Study. J Fluoresc 31:1719–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10895-021-02788-Z/TABLES/6
Table captions:
Table 1: Optimized bond lengths of 4HC in the gas phase in the ground state (S0) and excited state (S1)
Table 2: Thermodynamic parameters of 4HC by employing B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) at 298 K
Table 3: Thermodynamic properties of 4HC at different temperatures calculated by DFT/B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) method
Table 4: Global reactivity descriptors for 4HC calculated at TD-DFT/B3LYP/ 6-311 + + G (d, p) level of theory
Table 5: Excited-state properties - calculated electronic transition energies and corresponding oscillator strengths of the low-lying singlet excited states of 4HC using TD-DFT/ 6-311 + + G(d,p) level of theory.
Table 6: Computationally calculated spectral parameters of 4HC in the ground and excited-state in the gas phase and in different solvents
Table 7: Polarizability (α) and first-order static hyperpolarizability (β) of 4HC computed using DFT/ B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) level of theory
Table 8: Frequency dependent First-order hyperpolarizability β: electro optic Pockels effect (EOPE)
, the second harmonic generation of first hyperpolarizability (SHG)
of 4HC
Table 9: Some selected components of the static γ (-ω; ω,0,0) and frequency-dependent second order hyperpolarizability: dc Kerr static second hyperpolarizability- γ (-ω; ω,0,0) and ESHG- γ (-2ω; ω,0,0) of 4HC
Table 10: Bond type, occupancy, electron density, p character of significant natural atomic hybrid of the NBO of 4HC
Table 11: Stabilization energies for some significant donor acceptor interactions of 4HC
Figure captions:
Figure 1: Optimized molecular structure of 4HC using DFT/B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) theory.
Figure 2: Energy of HOMO and LUMO of 4HC calculated using DFT/ B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p).
Figure 3: Correlation graph of thermodynamic properties of 4HC at different temperatures
Figure 4: MEP map of 4HC obtained using DFT/ B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) in the gas phase
Figure 5: Theoretically calculated absorption spectra of 4HC in different solvents
Figure 6: Lippert Mataga correlation between Stoke′s shift (calculated by TD-DFT) and solvent polarity function (F(ε,n))
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Table(s)-
Table 1: Optimized bond lengths of 4HC in the gas phase in the ground state (S0) and excited state (S1)
Bond
Bond-length (
)
R (
)
Bond-length (
)
R (
)
O1-C5
1.3614
1.2982
O1-C12
1.4006
1.7559
O2-C6
1.3516
1.3694
O2-H18
0.9650
0.9629
O3-C12
1.2032
1.1809
C4-C5
1.4039
1.4408
C4-C6
1.4463
1.4389
C4-C7
1.4048
1.3824
C5-C8
1.3951
1.4260
C6-C9
1.3572
1.4026
C7-C10
1.3853
1.4337
C7-H13
1.0823
1.0828
C8-C11
1.3877
1.4020
C8-H14
1.0826
1.0832
C9-C12
1.4471
1.3810
C9-H15
1.0830
1.0853
C10-C11
1.4013
1.3848
C10-H16
1.0831
1.0833
C11-H17
1.0839
1.0824
Table 2: Thermodynamic parameters of 4HC by employing B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) at 298 K
Thermodynamic Parameters (298 K)
4HC
SCF energy (kcal.mol-1)
359.19
Total energy, thermal (
) (kcal.mol-1)
87.90
Zero-point vibrational energy (
) (kcal.mol-1)
82.33
Entropy (S) (cal.mol-1.K-1 )
92.39
Specific heat (
) (cal.mol-1 K-1)
35.72
Vibrational energy (
) (kcal.mol-1)
86.13
Rotational constants (GHz)
 
A
1.61
B
0.88
C
0.57
Dipole moment (Debye)
 
-0.03
4.76
0.00
4.76
Table 3: Thermodynamic properties of 4HC at different temperatures calculated by DFT/B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) method
Temperature (K)
Total energy, thermal
(kcal.mol− 1)
Entropy (S)
(cal.mol− 1.K− 1 )
Specific heat
(cal.mol− 1.K− 1)
50
82.66
58.14
8.06
100
83.18
66.44
12.56
200
84.98
79.85
23.84
300
87.97
92.63
35.94
400
92.12
105.07
46.80
500
97.26
116.95
55.69
600
103.20
128.11
62.72
700
109.76
138.52
68.29
800
116.82
148.20
72.75
900
124.28
157.22
76.41
1000
132.08
165.65
79.43
Table 4: Global reactivity descriptors for 4HC calculated at TD-DFT/B3LYP/ 6-311 + + G (d, p) level of theory
Parameters (eV)
4HC
HOMO
-6.82
LUMO
-2.08
Energy gap (∆E)
4.74
Ionization Potential (IP) = -HOMO
6.82
Electron Affinity (EA) = -LUMO
2.08
Electronegativity (χ) =
4.45
Chemical Potential (µ) = - χ
-4.45
Chemical Hardness(η) =
2.37
Electrophilicity (ω) =
4.18
Electron accepting power (ɷ+) =
2.25
Electron donating power (ɷ−) =
4.45
Softness (σ) (eV− 1) =
0.21
Table 5: Excited-state properties - calculated electronic transition energies and corresponding oscillator strengths of the low-lying singlet excited states of 4HC using TD-DFT/ 6-311 + + G(d,p) level of theory.
Electronic Transition
Energy
(eV)
(nm)
Oscillator strength
Contribution
CI%
4.6125
269
0.1542
H→L
86%
5.1173
242
0.1418
H
1→L
69%
5.3437
232
0.0000
H
→L
71%
Table 6: Computationally calculated spectral parameters of 4HC in the ground and excited-state in the gas phase and in different solvents
Solvents
Ground State
(D)
Excited State
  
(D)
HOMO (eV)
LUMO (eV)
ΔE (eV)
(nm)
(nm)
Excitation energy (eV)
Oscillator strength
f
Transition Dipole moment
ꚍ(ns)
LHE
Stokes shift (cm-1)
Cyclohexane
5.5316
5.6244
-8.22
-0.80
7.41
271
313
4.58
0.2400
2.92
4.6
0.42
5003.94
Benzene
5.6381
5.7532
-8.22
-0.80
7.42
271
313
4.58
0.2530
2.99
4.4
0.44
4998.72
Toluene
5.6766
5.8001
-8.22
-0.80
7.42
271
314
4.58
0.2529
2.99
4.4
0.44
5021.82
THF
6.3868
6.7016
-8.24
-0.81
7.43
269
317
4.60
0.2469
2.95
4.4
0.43
5545.34
Acetonitrile
6.7386
7.1855
-8.26
-0.82
7.44
268
319
4.62
0.2444
2.94
4.4
0.43
5876.54
DMSO
6.7628
7.2176
-8.26
-0.82
7.44
269
319
4.61
0.2583
3.02
4.2
0.45
5828.17
Methanol
6.7291
7.1729
-8.26
-0.82
7.44
268
319
4.62
0.2413
2.92
4.5
0.43
5883.53
Ethanol
6.6950
7.1277
-8.25
-0.81
7.44
269
318
4.62
0.2469
2.95
4.4
0.43
5822.43
Water
6.7944
7.2595
-8.26
-0.82
7.44
268
319
4.62
0.2433
2.93
4.4
0.43
5938.24
Table 7: Polarizability (α) and first-order static hyperpolarizability (β) of 4HC computed using DFT/ B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) level of theory
Polarizability
α (a.u.)
4HC
First-order static hyperpolarizability
β (a.u.)
4HC
145.93
-182.15
23.60
-40.56
145.26
199.69
0.00
105.26
0.00
0.00
58.86
0.00
(esu)
17.29
0.00
  
46.02
  
51.22
  
0.00
  
(esu)
12.25
Table 8: Frequency dependent First-order hyperpolarizability β: electro optic Pockels effect (EOPE)
, the second harmonic generation of first hyperpolarizability (SHG)
of 4HC
Frequency dependent First-order hyperpolarizability
β (a.u.)
Frequency dependent First-order hyperpolarizability
β (a.u.)
-194.73
-235.23
-41.98
-50.96
211.71
0.00
0.00
-28.92
0.00
239.63
49.38
0.00
-36.96
237.61
211.25
115.77
109.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
55.13
53.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
60.27
50.15
56.52
55.54
61.60
0.00
0.00
(esu)
10.72
(esu)
12.05
Table 9: Some selected components of the static γ (-ω; ω,0,0) and frequency-dependent second order hyperpolarizability: dc Kerr static second hyperpolarizability- γ (-ω; ω,0,0) and ESHG- γ (-2ω; ω,0,0) of 4HC
second-order hyperpolarizability γ (a.u.)
4HC
dc Kerr static second hyperpolarizability
γ (-ω; ω,0,0)
ESHG
γ ( -2ω; ω, ω, 0)
46088.10
51378.00
64356.90
19404.90
21219.40
24619.00
14339.20
15440.20
16893.30
11977.30
13513.00
16715.83
7746.31
8579.28
10017.99
6698.15
7369.44
8437.88
26535.14
29392.21
35242.52
(esu)
13.36
14.80
17.75
Table 10: Bond type, occupancy, electron density, p character of significant natural atomic hybrid of the NBO of 4HC
Bond (A-B)
Occupancy
EDA (%)
EDB (%)
Hybrid
Atom
p (%)
σ(O1-C5)
1.99
67.86
32.14
0.82sp1.87+0.57sp3.14
O1
65.09
     
C5
75.65
σ(O1-C12)
1.99
70.11
29.89
0.84sp2.29+0.55sp3.06
O1
69.58
     
C12
75.13
σ(O2-C6)
1.99
66.98
33.02
0.81sp1.82+0.58sp2.99
O2
64.54
     
C6
74.81
σ(O2-H18)
1.99
74.28
25.72
0.86sp3.81+0.51sp0.00
O2
79.13
     
H18
0.12
σ(O3-C12)
1.99
64.45
35.55
0.80sp1.43+0.57sp1.87
O3
58.84
     
C12
65.04
π(O3-C12)
1.98
69.32
30.68
0.83p1.00+0.55p1.00
O3
99.87
     
C12
99.54
σ(C4-C5)
1.97
50.98
49.02
0.71sp2.08+0.70sp1.66
C4
67.49
     
C5
62.45
π(C4-C5)
1.61
55.16
44.84
0.74p1.00+0.67p1.00
C4
99.98
     
C5
99.97
σ(C4-C6)
1.97
50.68
49.32
0.71sp2.18+0.70sp1.86
C4
68.48
     
C6
65.05
σ(C4-C7)
1.97
52.19
47.81
0.72sp1.78+0.69sp1.92
C4
63.98
     
C7
65.74
σ(C5-C8)
1.98
51.12
48.88
0.71sp1.63+0.70sp1.94
C5
61.90
     
C8
65.99
σ(C6-C9)
1.98
50.65
49.35
0.71sp1.51+0.70sp1.69
C6
60.10
     
C7
62.76
π(C6-C9)
1.81
42.03
57.97
0.65p1.00+0.76p1.00
C6
99.91
     
C9
99.94
σ(C7-C10)
1.98
50.44
49.56
0.71sp1.83+0.70sp1.79
C7
63.27
     
C10
64.18
π(C7-C10)
1.69
48.30
51.70
0.69p1.00+0.71p1.00
C7
99.95
     
C10
99.96
σ(C7-H13)
1.98
61.29
38.71
0.78sp2.43+0.62s1.00
C7
70.85
     
H13
0.05
σ(C8-C11)
1.98
50.51
49.49
0.71sp1.73+0.70sp1.80
C8
63.40
     
C11
64.31
π(C8-C11)
1.68
51.97
48.03
0.72p1.00+0.70p1.00
C8
99.95
     
C11
99.95
σ(C8-H14)
1.98
61.37
38.63
0.78sp2.39+0.70s1.00
C8
70.47
     
H14
0.05
σ(C9-C12)
1.98
51.47
48.53
0.71sp2.09+0.70sp1.48
C9
67.66
     
C12
59.59
σ(C9-H15)
1.97
61.16
38.84
0.78sp2.27+0.62s1.00
C9
69.44
     
H15
0.05
σ(C10-C11)
1.98
49.94
50.06
0.71sp1.83+0.71sp1.79
C10
64.64
     
C11
64.17
σ(C10-H16)
1.98
60.62
39.38
0.78sp2.46+0.70s1.00
C10
71.05
     
H16
0.05
σ(C11-H17)
1.98
60.58
39.42
0.78sp2.50+0.70s1.00
C11
71.39
     
H17
0.05
LP (O1)
1.96
  
sp1.91
O1
65.16
LP (O1)
1.74
  
p1.00
O1
99.94
LP (O2)
1.98
  
sp1.28
O2
56.13
LP (O2)
1.84
  
p1.00
O2
99.94
LP (O3)
1.98
  
sp0.69
O3
40.98
LP (O3)
1.83
  
p1.00
O3
99.87
Table 11: Stabilization energies for some significant donor acceptor interactions of 4HC
Donor NBO (i)
Acceptor NBO (j)
E2 (kcal/mol)
E(j)-E(i) (a.u.)
F(i,j) (a.u.)
π(C4-C5 )
π*(C6 - C9)
19.14
0.28
0.068
π(C4-C5)
π*(C7-C10)
19.83
0.30
0.070
π(C4-C5)
π*(C8-C11)
15.51
0.30
0.062
π(C6-C9)
π*(O3-C12)
24.14
0.31
0.080
π(C6-C9)
π*(C4-C5)
9.02
0.31
0.050
π(C7-C10)
π*(C4-C5)
17.62
0.27
0.064
π(C7-C10)
π*(C8-C11)
21.35
0.28
0.070
π(C8-C11)
π*(C4-C5)
23.11
0.27
0.073
π (C8-C11)
π*(C7-C10)
17.20
0.29
0.063
CR (O3)
RY*(C12)
6.88
20.01
0.332
LP(O1)
π*(C4-C5)
6.51
1.09
0.075
LP(O1)
π*(O3-C12)
33.00
0.35
0.097
LP(O1)
π*(C4-C5)
31.19
0.35
0.097
LP(O2)
π*(C6-C9)
6.12
1.23
0.078
LP(O2)
π*(C6-C9)
34.46
0.37
0.103
LP(O3)
RY*(C12)
17.36
1.87
0.161
LP(O3)
π*(O1-C12)
38.23
0.55
0.131
LP(O3)
π*(C9-C12)
16.00
0.71
0.098
π*(C4-C5)
π*(C7-C10)
197.24
0.01
0.079
π*(C4-C5)
π*(C8-C11)
262.59
0.01
0.083
Total words in MS: 6937
Total words in Title: 13
Total words in Abstract: 176
Total Keyword count: 2
Total Images in MS: 12
Total Tables in MS: 22
Total Reference count: 57