A
Nigeria. 1 Email
Adeyemi Ogedengbe Omoge 1✉ Email Email
Oluwabunmi Bridget Erinsakin 1,5
Oladunni Opeyemi 5
Idowu Abimbola Olumakinde 5
Busayomi Elizabeth Folashayo 1
Philip Michael Nanle 1
1 3Ps Health Initiative International Ondo City Nigeria
2 University of Nicosia Medical School Nicosia Cyprus
3 University of Oviedo Oviedo Spain
4 JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research Mysuru Indian
5 Adeleke University Ede Nigeria
Knowledge and Attitudes of Cervical Cancer Prevention among Women of Reproductive Age in Tertiary Institutions in Osun State, Nigeria.
1,2,3,4 Adeyemi Ogedengbe Omoge (ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4921-6262), 1,5Oluwabunmi Bridget Erinsakin, 5Oladunni Opeyemi, 5Idowu Abimbola Olumakinde, 5Busayomi Elizabeth Folashayo & 5Philip Michael Nanle
1 3Ps Health Initiative International, Ondo City, Nigeria; 2University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus; 3University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain; 4JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru, Indian; 5Adeleke University, Ede, Nigeria.
Corresponding Author: omogeadeyemi@gmail.com; uo294535@uniovi.es ; omoge.a@live.unic.ac.cy
ABSTRACT
Background
A
Cervical cancer remains a major public health concern among women in Nigeria, particularly due to low awareness, cultural misconceptions, and inadequate utilization of preventive measures. Understanding knowledge and attitudes among young women is essential to informing targeted interventions.
Objective
This study assessed the knowledge and attitudes towards cervical cancer prevention among female undergraduates in tertiary institutions in Osun State, Nigeria.
Methodology:
A descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized, involving 396 female undergraduate students selected through a multi-stage sampling technique. Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire and analysed with SPSS version 21. Descriptive statistics summarized knowledge and attitude levels, while Chi-square tests examined associations between variables, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results
The mean age of respondents was 25.3 ± 8.2 years. More than half (61.6%) had heard of HPV, while 50.0% were aware of the HPV vaccine. Overall, 52.0% demonstrated good knowledge, whereas 48.0% had low knowledge of cervical cancer prevention. Regarding attitudes, 52.0% of respondents expressed negative attitudes, while 48.0% had positive attitudes. Chi-square analysis showed no statistically significant association between knowledge and attitude towards cervical cancer prevention (χ² = 2.537, p = 0.121). Similarly, there was no significant association between attitude and the preventive orientation (χ² = 0.025, p = 0.905).
Conclusion
A
Despite moderate awareness, negative attitudes toward cervical cancer prevention remain prevalent. Strengthening institutional health education, correcting misconceptions, and promoting HPV vaccination and screening uptake are essential to improving preventive behaviours.
Keywords:
Knowledge
Attitudes
Cervical Cancer
Prevention
Reproductive Age Women
Tertiary Institutions
Nigeria
A
A
Introduction
Cervical cancer (CC) is a malignancy of the cervix, the lower part of the uterus that connects to the vagina. Persistent infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually transmitted virus, is the primary cause of cervical cancer[1]. Although most HPV infections resolve spontaneously, long-term infection can lead to precancerous lesions and, ultimately, invasive cervical cancer[1].
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women. In 2022, an estimated 660,000 women were diagnosed with cervical cancer worldwide and about 350,000 women died from the disease[2]. In sub-Saharan Africa, the burden is particularly high, with about 125,699 new cases reported annually[3]. In Nigeria, approximately 13,676 new cases and 7,093 deaths occur each year, making cervical cancer one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women[4]. Women living with HIV face an even higher risk due to compromised immunity, which reduces their ability to clear HPV infection[5].
Unlike high-income countries, where organized screening programmes and HPV vaccination have substantially reduced cervical cancer incidence and mortality, most low-income countries lack adequate preventive infrastructure. In Nigeria, challenges include low awareness, limited access to screening, cost barriers, and cultural misconceptions that discourage utilization of preventive services[67]. The situation is worsened by late-stage presentation of cases, which drastically reduces survival rates[8].
According to international guidelines, cervical cancer prevention relies on two key strategies: primary prevention through HPV vaccination (recommended before sexual debut) and secondary prevention through regular screening (Pap smear, HPV testing, or visual inspection with acetic acid) beginning at age 21[9, 10]. However, in Nigeria, HPV vaccines are not yet integrated into the national immunization programme, and screening uptake remains low due to financial, informational, and cultural barriers.
Young women in tertiary institutions represent a critical population for cervical cancer prevention. They are at increased risk of HPV exposure due to early sexual activity but are also highly receptive to health education interventions. This study therefore assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices regarding cervical cancer among female undergraduates in selected tertiary institutions in Osun State, Nigeria.
Methodology
Study Location
This study was conducted in selected tertiary institutions in Osun State, Nigeria. Osun State is located in the South-West geopolitical zone and hosts a mix of public and private universities, contributing to a diverse academic environment. The selected institutions were Adeleke University (Ede), Redeemer’s University (Ede), and Osun State University (Osogbo Campus). These institutions were intentionally chosen to represent different ownership structures and socio-cultural student populations, allowing the findings to reflect variations in exposure to health information and access to healthcare services.
Young women in tertiary institutions constitute a strategic group for cervical cancer prevention efforts. Although they are within an age bracket where sexual activity and risk of HPV exposure commonly begin, multiple studies have shown that awareness and uptake of cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination remain low among this group despite their educational advantage. Conducting this study in tertiary institutions therefore provides a suitable platform for identifying knowledge gaps and strengthening targeted preventive health education.
Study Population
A
The study population consisted of female undergraduate students enrolled across the selected universities in Osun State. A total of 396 female students participated in the study. Female undergraduate students were chosen because they fall within the age group most vulnerable to early HPV exposure, which is a major risk factor for cervical cancer development later in life. Despite being in an academic environment with potential access to health information, evidence from previous studies in Nigeria indicates that many female undergraduates still have limited awareness and low uptake of cervical cancer preventive measures.
Studying this population therefore provides valuable insight into existing knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices, enabling the design of targeted interventions that can promote early adoption of screening and HPV vaccination. Additionally, universities provide a structured environment where preventive health education and awareness programs can be implemented effectively.
Study Design and Sampling
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among women of reproductive age in tertiary institutions in Osun state, Nigeria. A cross – sectional descriptive study design approach was employed to ensure a comprehensive analysis.
Sample Size and Sampling Methods
A multi-stage sampling technique was used to select 396 respondents from the selected institutions in Osun State, Nigeria. The study was carried out in institutions selected through simple random sampling of the participants. These institutions were chosen to provide a representative mix of private and public universities within the state. The sample size for this study was calculated using Taro Yamane (1967) formula to obtain the sufficient sample size. The formula applied is given as: n = N / (1 + N (e) 2)
Where n = Sample size, N = Total population under study, e = margin error and 1 = adjusted constant. After adjusting for a 10% non – response rate, the final sample was 396.
Data Collection and Analysis
The study was carried out with the use of a semi-structured questionnaire from the sampled population comprises of 396 respondents.
The results were analysed using Statistical Package for Service Solutions (SPSS) Version 21. Descriptive and inferential statistics such as Chi-square tests were used to assess the associations between knowledge and attitudes of cervical cancer. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
Female undergraduate students enrolled in any of the selected institutions, 16 years and above.
Exclusion Criteria
Male, postgraduate student, staff, students from other institutions.
RESULTS
A
Table 1
Socio-Demographic Characteristics Distribution of Respondents (n = 396)
Variables
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Age (years)
16–20
276
69.7
21–25
103
26.1
26–30
17
4.3
Mean ± Std Dev = 25.3 ± 8.2
Religion
Christianity
313
79.0
Islam
83
21.0
Ethnicity
   
Yoruba
325
82.1
Igbo
47
11.9
Hausa
13
3.28
Others
11
2.77
Mode of study
Full Time
386
97.5
Part Time
10
2.5
Level
100
192
48.5
200
48
12.1
300
44
11.1
400
96
24.2
500
16
4.0
Marital Status
Single
372
93.9
Married
24
6.1
A
Table 2
Knowledge of Respondents on Cervical Cancer Prevention (n = 396)
Variables
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Have you heard of human papilloma virus?
     
No
152
38.4
 
Yes
244
61.6
 
Which of the following is your source of information
     
School
17
4.29
 
Media
72
18.2
 
Friends
59
15.0
 
Family members
52
13.1
 
Church/Mosque members
49
12.3
 
Health worker
125
31.5
 
Others
22
5.55
 
Is HPV a virus?
     
No
190
48.0
 
Yes
206
52.0
 
How do you think HPV is transmitted
     
Skin to skin contact
120
30.3
 
Coughing and sneezing
89
22.4
 
Contact with body fluids
50
12.6
 
Toilet seat
68
17.1
 
Self-inoculation (Orally)
51
12.9
 
I don’t know
18
4.7
 
Which of the following health issues are related to HPV
     
Cervical Cancer
112
28.3
 
Genital warts
98
24.7
 
Penile cancer
52
13.1
 
Breast cancer
47
11.9
 
Vulva cancer
39
9.9
 
I don’t know
29
7.3
 
None
19
4.8
 
Do you know that human papilloma virus can be prevented
 
No
294
74.2
 
Yes
102
25.8
 
Have you heard of human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines
 
No
198
50.0
 
Yes
198
50.0
 
Have you heard of cervical cancer
     
No
66
16.7
 
Yes
330
83.3
 
Have you heard of cervical cancer screening test
     
No
114
28.8
 
Yes
282
71.2
 
What is cervical cancer screening test called
     
Pap smear
242
61.1
 
HPV testing
82
20.7
 
Visual examination
60
15.2
 
I don’t know
12
3.02
 
Do you know that the intake of HPV vaccine could lower the risk of cervical cancer
 
No
176
44.4
 
Yes
220
55.6
 
Intake of HPV vaccines before the start of sexual activities can prevent the onset of human papilloma virus
 
No
272
68.7
 
Yes
124
31.3
 
Is cervical cancer a preventable disease
     
No
73
18.4
 
Yes
323
81.6
 
Do you know that early screening uptake can detect an abnormal growth in the cervix
 
No
136
34.3
 
Yes
260
65.7
 
STD is a risk to cervical cancer
     
No
73
18.4
 
Yes
323
81.6
 
Having sex with multiple persons can be a risk to cervical cancer
 
No
71
17.9
 
Yes
325
82.1
 
Having sex with a person with multiple sexual partners can also be a risk to cervical cancer
 
No
182
46.0
 
Yes
214
54.0
 
Smoking is a risk to cervical cancer
     
No
241
60.9
 
Yes
155
39.1
 
Oral contraceptives can pose a risk to cervical cancer
     
No
180
45.5
 
Yes
216
54.5
 
Do you know that genetic history of cervical cancer can increase a person’s risk of cervical cancer
 
No
144
36.4
 
Yes
252
63.6
 
Cervical cancer test is only for sick persons
     
No
277
70.0
 
Yes
119
30.0
 
How many times should a woman undergo cervical cancer screening
 
Once
110
27.8
 
Twice
4
1.0
 
Thrice
28
7.1
 
Four
231
58.3
 
I don't know
23
5.8
 
A
Table 3
Attitude of Respondents on Cervical Cancer Prevention (n = 396)
SA: Strongly Agree, A: Agree, N: Neutral, D: Disagree, SD: Strongly Disagree
s/n
Variables
 
SA
A
N
D
SD
1
Human papilloma virus vaccine is meant for unhealthy individuals only
F
74
78
51
95
98
%
18.7
19.7
12.9
24.0
24.7
2
Cervical cancer screening is meant for only those who are sick
F
43
51
33
101
168
%
10.9
12.9
8.3
25.5
42.4
3
Having multiple sexual partners can increase the risk of cervical cancer
F
155
155
59
21
6
%
39.1
39.1
14.9
5.3
1.5
4
HPV is transmitted through sexual intercourse
F
139
141
94
17
5
%
35.1
35.6
23.7
4.3
1.3
5
HPV can increase the risk of cervical cancer
F
140
114
73
57
12
%
35.4
28.8
18.4
14.4
3.0
6
Early marriage onset is a risk to cervical cancer
F
87
105
76
87
41
%
22.0
26.5
19.2
22.0
10.4
7
Cervical cancer is a major health problem for women
F
166
98
66
46
20
%
41.9
24.7
16.7
11.6
5.1
8
Early diagnosis of premalignant lesions is good for treatment outcome
F
183
126
63
24
0
%
46.2
31.8
15.9
6.1
0.0
9
Cervical cancer is preventable
F
188
117
62
8
21
%
47.5
29.5
15.7
2.0
5.3
10
Cervical cancer is curable
F
137
117
51
45
46
%
34.6
29.5
12.9
11.4
11.6
11
Early screening can help detect the onset of premalignant lesions
F
167
105
66
21
37
%
42.2
26.5
16.7
5.3
9.3
Association Between Knowledge and Attitudes of Cervical Cancer Prevention
 
Categories
Knowledge on Cervical Cancer prevention
χ2
p-value
Decision
 
Low
High
Prevention of cervical cancer
Good
153
152
2.537
.121
Not sig.
Poor
37
54
 
Categories
Attitude towards cervical cancer prevention
χ2
p-value
Decision
Negative
Positive
Prevention of cervical cancer
Good
158
147
.025
.905
Not sig.
Poor
48
43
Discussion
Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Participants
The mean age of respondents (25.305 ± 8.195) aligns with the reproductive age group most at risk for HPV infection and cervical cancer. Out of the 396 respondents, 79.0% were Christians, 82.1% were Yoruba. 97.5% were full time students, 48.5% were from 100 level, and 93.9% were single. Overall Results revealed that 52.0% had good knowledge of cervical cancer prevention. 77.0% had bad practice towards cervical cancer prevention, and 52.0% had negative attitude towards cervical cancer prevention.
The result from this finding reflects the demographic profile of Osun State and is similar to findings in other Nigerian tertiary-institution-based studies[14, 15]. The high proportion of single women (93.9%) suggests an opportunity for early preventive interventions before marriage and childbearing.
Knowledge on Cervical Cancer Prevention
The study highlights that only 52% of the study respondents have adequate knowledge of cervical cancer prevention, while 48% lack sufficient awareness. This indicates a substantial gap in knowledge despite the presence of health information sources, pointing to missed opportunities for education and awareness-building among this population. This result is consistent with findings from Adebayo et al. (2021)[14], who noted similar knowledge levels (60.6%) among antenatal attendees in Ibadan, and Ekwonwa et al. (2017)[15], where knowledge levels were even higher (72.8%) among reproductive-age women in Ede South. This pattern suggests that women within healthcare settings, like antenatal clinics, may have more access to cervical cancer information than those in other environments.
However, the results contrast with Ogbonna (2017)[16], where less than half of the respondents displayed adequate knowledge. This discrepancy may reflect differences in education access, geographic or socioeconomic backgrounds, and healthcare exposure across study populations. Although most respondents in the article’s study were aware of the HPV vaccine and the benefits of early screening, many were unfamiliar with the terminology, such as what a Pap smear is. This detail signals potential deficiencies in the clarity and comprehensiveness of health messaging, where specific terms and procedural information may not be fully explained or emphasized, possibly leading to misunderstandings about preventive measures.
Health workers and media emerged as the most common sources of information for the study respondents, consistent with findings by Duru et al. (2015)[17] and Ilika (2016)[18]. This reliance on health workers underscores the critical role healthcare professionals play in disseminating accurate health information. However, the mass media’s significant influence highlights both an opportunity and a challenge: while media can reach large audiences, it can also convey unfiltered or incorrect information. This risk may partially explain why knowledge and attitudes toward cervical cancer prevention remain inconsistent or limited.
Attitude Towards Cervical Cancer Prevention
While knowledge is moderate, attitudes toward cervical cancer prevention were notably negative in over half (52%) of the respondents. This outcome contrasts with Mullatu et al. (2017)[19], where a majority of female students at Mizan Tepi University held positive attitudes. The article attributes this difference to unfiltered information, particularly from non-healthcare sources, that may foster misconceptions. This finding reflects a broader issue where partial or inaccurate information can hinder preventive attitudes, as also noted by Sajid et al. (2019)[20], who reported that over half of their respondents’ believed screening was unnecessary without symptoms. This underscores the need for accurate, trusted health information to shift attitudes positively. Negative attitudes among respondents could contribute to low engagement in preventive behaviours, as individuals are less likely to seek services they do not prioritize or fully understand.
The practice of preventive behaviours like screening and HPV vaccination is markedly low among the respondents, with 77% showing poor preventive practices. Despite having some knowledge, most respondents have not acted on it, as evidenced by 74.5% who never underwent HPV testing, 72.5% who never received the HPV vaccine, and 58.6% who never participated in cervical cancer screening. This gap between knowledge and practice is consistent with other studies, such as Nowomuhangi (2019)[21], where only half of the first-year nursing students had undergone screening, and Rahmat, A. et al. (2021)[22], which found a 30% screening uptake among respondents. This pattern suggests a systemic issue across Africa, where knowledge is present but does not translate into action due to barriers like access to healthcare, affordability of preventive measures, cultural beliefs, and potentially low risk perception.
Association Between Knowledge and Attitudes of Cervical Cancer Prevention
The absence of significant associations between knowledge, and attitude (χ²=2.54, p = 0.121; χ²=0.03, p = 0.905) suggests that cognitive awareness does not necessarily translate into behavioural change. This supports behavioural theory, which emphasizes that enabling environments, affordability, and cultural acceptance are as important as individual knowledge in shaping preventive practices[7].
Implications for Assessment of Knowledge and Attitude
The findings underscore a critical need for enhanced education and practical interventions to bridge the knowledge-attitude-practice (KAP) gap. Health programmes must focus on clear communication, addressing misconceptions, and creating accessible channels for screening and vaccination. Additionally, policy measures that subsidize or integrate HPV vaccines and screenings into regular health services could significantly improve preventive practice uptake. These actions would address the practical challenges that hinder behaviour change, helping align knowledge and attitude with consistent preventive practices.
In summary, while this study reveals that awareness is present among reproductive-age women, barriers rooted in information quality, cultural context, and systemic healthcare access issues prevent this knowledge from translating into preventive actions. These insights indicate a need for tailored health interventions that directly address the structural and cultural barriers to cervical cancer prevention in Nigeria and similar settings.
Conclusion
This study revealed that although just over half of the respondents demonstrated good knowledge of cervical cancer prevention, negative attitudes towards preventive measures remained common among female undergraduate students in tertiary institutions in Osun State. The absence of a significant association between knowledge and attitude indicates that awareness alone does not necessarily translate into positive perceptions or willingness to adopt preventive behaviours. This suggests that misconceptions, cultural beliefs, and limited exposure to practical preventive programmes continue to influence attitudes despite available information.
Strengthening cervical cancer prevention among young women in academic settings therefore requires more than information dissemination. Interventions must actively address attitudinal barriers by incorporating targeted health education, supportive peer influence, relatable messaging, and accessible screening and vaccination opportunities. Integrating cervical cancer prevention into institutional health promotion programmes and national public health strategies will be essential to fostering informed, positive attitudes that encourage early uptake of preventive services. Addressing these gaps at the university level has the potential to contribute significantly to reducing cervical cancer burden among women in Nigeria.
Recommendations
To address the gaps identified in this study, the following recommendations are proposed:
For Practice and Policy
1.
Integrate Cervical Cancer Prevention into Institutional Health Programmes: Establish routine health education sessions in tertiary institutions, focusing on cervical cancer awareness and the importance of preventive practices like screening and HPV vaccination. This can ensure sustained exposure to accurate information within academic environments.
2.
Subsidize HPV Vaccination and Screening Costs: Advocate for policy interventions that make HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screenings more affordable and accessible. Including these services in Nigeria’s public health agenda can help overcome financial barriers that deter preventive practices.
3.
A
Collaborate with Trusted Community Leaders and Healthcare Professionals: Partner with local healthcare providers and community influencers to build trust and improve the credibility of cervical cancer education, making it easier to address and overcome cultural and social barriers.
For Health Education and Public Awareness
1.
Enhance Clarity and Accessibility of Health Information: Develop clear and accessible educational materials that demystify cervical cancer prevention terminology, such as explaining Pap smear testing. This will help bridge knowledge gaps, particularly among those unfamiliar with medical terminology.
2.
Use Media to Promote Positive Health Behaviours: Leverage mass media and social media platforms to disseminate reliable health information and debunk misconceptions. Campaigns can be tailored to target young women in tertiary institutions, using relatable messaging and testimonials to foster positive attitudes toward preventive actions.
3.
Implement Interactive Workshops and Peer Education Programmes: Host interactive sessions, such as workshops and peer-led education programmes, where women can openly discuss misconceptions, address cultural beliefs, and learn about cervical cancer prevention in an engaging and supportive environment.
For Future Research and Development
1.
Explore Additional Factors Affecting Behaviour Change: Conduct further studies to examine unaddressed variables like motivation, healthcare access, and the impact of socioeconomic status on preventive behaviour. These insights can inform more tailored interventions that effectively convert knowledge and attitude into action.
2.
Evaluate Health Education Strategies: Implement pilot programmes testing different health education approaches and monitor their effectiveness in changing knowledge, attitudes, and practices. This data can help optimize cervical cancer awareness programmes and identify the most impactful communication strategies.
By implementing these recommendations, public health stakeholders and educational institutions can create a supportive environment for cervical cancer prevention, ensuring that knowledge and positive attitudes translate into tangible preventive actions among women in Nigeria and similar contexts.
Declarations
ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
A
A
Ethical approval was obtained from the Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences Research and Ethics Committee, Adeleke University, Ede, Nigeria.
A
The research protocol, including all procedures involving human participants was received and approved by the Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences Research and Ethics Committee, Adeleke University, Ede, Nigeria.
A
All methods were carried out in accordance with the committee’s guidelines and relevant regulations.
A
Approval to conduct the research in the universities was also sought from the selected universities (Osun State University, Oshogbo Chapter, Redeemers University, Ede, and Adeleke University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria.
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
A
An informed consent was obtained from all participants who participated in this study. Permission was obtained from the respondents before administering the questionnaire, and confidentiality of all respondents was ensured. All participants provided an informed consent to participate in this study.
CONSENT TO PULISH
All participants provided an informed consent for the anonymised data to be published as part of this study.
A
Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
STATEMENT OF CONFIRMATION
A
A
All methods used were in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
COMPETING INTERESTS
All authors declare that there is no competing interest.
A
FUNDING INFORMATION
No funding received for the study.
A
Author Contribution
All authors contributed to the research
A
Acknowledgement
All authors are acknowledged.
References
1.
American society of clinical oncology. Cervical cancer Diagnosis and Stages. Knowledge Conquers Cancer; 2020.
2.
Saad A, Kabiru S, Suleiman H, Rukaiya A. (2013). Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Cervical Cancer Screening among Market Women in Zaria, Nigeria. Nigeria medical Journal vol.54.
3.
Amine C, Sanaa ELM, Nabil I, Zakia C, Jamal B, Chakib N, Amine ELH, Yahya C, Noureddine B. (2016). Evaluation of the Cost of Cervical Cancer at the National Institute of Oncology, Rabat. Pan Afr Med J. 23.
4.
World Health Organization. (2023). Cervical cancer: Prevention and control. WHO Global Strategy Fact Sheet. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cervical-cancer
5.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2012).
6.
World Health Organization. (2015). Cervical Cancer.
7.
Ajibola I, Olowookere S, Fagbemi A, Ogunlaja O. (2016). Determinants of cervical cancer screening uptake among women in Ilorin, North Central Nigeria: a community-based study. Journal of cancer epidemiology. Vol. 2016, article ID 6469240, 8 pages.
8.
Scott AM, Venetia Q, Johannes B, Hester M, Johannes A. Disease Burden of Human Papillomavirus Infection in the Netherlands. The Gap between Females and Males is Diminishing; 2017.
9.
Musa J, Nankat J, Achenbach C, Shambe H, Taiwo O, Mandong B, Daru P, Murphy R, Sagay S. (2016). Cervical cancer survival in a resource-limited setting-North Central Nigeria. Infect. Agents Canc., vol.11 (1) (2016), p. 15.
10.
Kumar H, Tanya S. A Study on Knowledge and Screening for Cervical Cancer among Women in Mangalore City. Ann Med Health Sci Res; 2014.
A
11.
Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson H. American cancer society, American society for colposcopy and cervical pathology, and American society for clinical pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(3):147–72.
A
12.
WHO. (2014). Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to Essential Practice.
13.
Okonufua F. HPV Vaccine and Prevention of Cervical Cancer in Africa. AFR J Reprod Health; 2007.
14.
Adebayo M, Oluwasomidoyin O. The Determinants of Knowledge of Cervical Cancer, Attitude towards Screening and Practice of Cervical Cancer Prevention amongst Antenatal Attendees in Ibadan. Southwest Nigeria; 2021.
15.
Ekwonwa E, Olariike K, Abayomi O, Ugushida O. Awareness, Knowledge and Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women of Reproductive Age in Selected Wards in Ede South Local Government Area, Osun State. East African Scholars Journal of Medical Sciences; 2020.
16.
Ogbonna F, Med A. Knowledge, Attitude, and Experience of Cervical Cancer and Screening among Sub-Saharan African Female Students in a UK University. Natl Libr Med. 2017;16(1):18–23.
17.
Duru C, Oluoha R, Uwakwe K, Diwe KC, Merenu I, Emerole C, Iwu C. Pattern of Pap Smear Test Results among Nigerian Women Attending Clinics in a Teaching Hospital. Int J Curr Microb App Sci. 2015;4(4):986–98.
18.
IIika I, Gani O, McFubara K. Cervical Cancer Screening among Female Undergraduates and Staff in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gnecology; 2013.
19.
Mulatu K, Ayalew M, Melkam., and, Mulugeta T. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice on Cervical Cancer Screening among Female Students of Mizan Tepi University, Ethiopia. Cancer Biol Ther Oncol; 2017.
20.
Sajid et al. (2019). Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards cervical cancer screening among female health care professionals.
21.
Nowomuhangi B. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice on Cervical Cancer and Screening among First. Year Female Nursing Students of Kampala international university; 2019.
22.
Rahmat A, Abimbola O, Olaide E. Predictors of Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening among Nurses in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Volume 15. African Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health; 2021.
Total words in MS: 3506
Total words in Title: 0
Total words in Abstract: 230
Total Keyword count: 7
Total Images in MS: 0
Total Tables in MS: 4
Total Reference count: 22