Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Uncovers Neutrophil Clusters Associated with Autoimmune Neuroinflammation
YongWang1
WilliamJ.Turbitt1,5
LiannaZhou1
ZhaoqiYan1,6
SwetaB.Patel2,7
WeiYang1,8
ZhangLi1
JessicaA.Buckley1
RobertS.Welner2
WilliamR.Meador3
ChanderRaman4
Dr.
HongweiQin1,9✉
Phone+1-205-934-2573Email
A
EttyN.Benveniste1✉
Dr.
EttyTika9
Phone+1-205-934-7667Email
Benveniste9
1
A
A
A
A
Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology
2Department of Medicine
3Department of Neurology
4Department of DermatologyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham35294BirminghamALUSA
5EMD Serono, Inc01821BillericaMAUSA
6Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease94158San FranciscoCAUSA
7Division of Hematology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Colorado80045Anschutz, AuroraCOUSA
8Weill Cornell Medicine10021New YorkNYUSA
9
A
Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative BiologyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham701 19th Street South, ALGEN, Suite 83535294BirminghamAL
Yong Wang1, William J. Turbitt 1, 5, Lianna Zhou1, Zhaoqi Yan1, 6, Sweta B. Patel2, 7, Wei Yang1,8, Zhang Li1, Jessica A. Buckley1, Robert S. Welner2, William R. Meador3, Chander Raman4, Hongwei Qin1* and Etty N. Benveniste1*
1Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, 2Department of Medicine, 3Department of Neurology, and 4Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
5EMD Serono, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821, USA
6Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
7Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado – Anschutz, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
8Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA
*Co-Corresponding Authors:
Dr. Hongwei Qin, Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1918 University Boulevard, MCLM 907, Birmingham, AL 35294. Phone: +1-205-934-2573. E-mail address: hqin@uab.edu
Dr. Etty (Tika) Benveniste, Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 701 19th Street South, ALGEN, Suite 835, Birmingham, AL 35294. Phone: +1-205-934-7667. E-mail address: tika@uab.edu
ABSTRACT
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by multifocal inflammation and axonal degeneration, driven by innate and adaptive immune cells. The Janus Kinase (JAK)/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STAT)/Suppressors Of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) pathway regulates immune cell activity, with SOCS proteins functioning as negative regulators. Using the Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS, our prior work demonstrated that mice lacking Socs3 in myeloid cells (Socs3ΔLysM) developed severe, brain-targeted EAE (btEAE), with increased cerebellar infiltration of activated neutrophils.
To define neutrophil-specific roles, we generated mice with Socs3 deletion restricted to neutrophils (Socs3ΔLy6G). Following MOG-induced EAE, these mice exhibited clinical features identical to Socs3ΔLysM mice, including severe cerebellar demyelination, increased cerebellar infiltration of activated neutrophils and CD4+ T-cells, and clinical symptoms of both btEAE and classical EAE (cEAE), the latter involving the spinal cord (SC). Cerebellar neutrophils from Socs3ΔLy6G mice exhibited a primed, inflammatory phenotype with elevated reactive oxygen species, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and heightened production of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines. Neutrophil depletion alleviated btEAE, confirming their pathogenic role.
Single-cell RNA Sequencing (scRNA-Seq) of cerebellum (CB) and SC neutrophils revealed five clusters in naïve and EAE mice, with expansion of two clusters (Neu2 and Neu4) in Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE. Neu2, Neu3 and Neu4 clusters showed high expression of Saa3, Il1b and Cxcl2, with Neu4 enriched in cytokine signaling pathways and inflammatory responses. Strikingly, Saa3 mRNA and protein expression were markedly increased in the CB and SC of Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE compared to controls. Translationally, the human orthologue SAA1 was significantly elevated in plasma from MS patients relative to healthy controls.
Collectively, these findings demonstrate that Socs3 deficiency unleashes pathogenic neutrophil activity in Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE. They further reveal neutrophil heterogeneity within the inflamed CNS, define inflammatory transcriptional states and identify Saa3/SAA1 as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets to attenuate autoimmune neuroinflammation.
KEYWORDS:
Suppressors Of Cytokine Signaling 3 (SOCS3)
Serum Amyloid A3 (SAA3)
Brain-targeted Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (btEAE)
Single-cell RNA Sequencing (scRNA-Seq)
SAA3 (Serum amyloid A 3)
Neutrophils
INTRODUCTION
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by immune-mediated demyelination, neuroinflammation, and progressive neurodegeneration [14]. While adaptive immune cells such as T and B lymphocytes are well established as key drivers of MS and its animal model, Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE), the roles of innate immune cells remain less defined [3, 5, 6]. Over twenty FDA-approved disease-modifying therapies reduce relapse rates in relapsing-remitting MS; however, none halt long-term progression, underscoring the need to identify pathogenic and protective immune subsets through high-resolution profiling [7].
The Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway, activated by more than 70 cytokines, is central to immune regulation [811]. Aberrant STAT activation has been reported in MS, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and Parkinson’s disease (PD) [8, 1216]. Suppressors Of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) proteins serve as negative feedback regulators of JAK/STAT signaling [9, 1720], and dysregulated Socs3 expression in MS correlates with enhanced STAT3 activation [21, 22]. Our prior work showed that pharmacologic JAK/STAT inhibition ameliorates EAE by suppressing pathogenic T-cell differentiation, dampening myeloid activation, and limiting leukocyte infiltration into the CNS [8, 23].
Click here to download actual image
EAE manifests as distinct clinical subtypes: classical EAE (cEAE), with ascending paralysis and spinal cord (SC) inflammation, and brain-targeted EAE (btEAE), marked by ataxia, tremors, and cerebellar (CB) inflammation[6, 2428]. Previously, we showed that mice lacking Socs3 in myeloid cells (Socs3ΔLysM) develop a severe mixed phenotype with both cEAE and btEAE. The btEAE phenotype depends on cerebellar neutrophil infiltration and activation [2426]. These findings suggest that myeloid SOCS3 restrains region-specific CNS inflammation and neutrophil-driven pathology.
Click here to Correct
Neutrophils are increasingly recognized as important mediators of neuroinflammation across several CNS disorders, including MS, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, AD, PD, and stroke [2938]. In MS, neutrophils display hyperactivation characterized by increased degranulation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [3941]. Neutrophils are among the earliest immune cells to infiltrate the CNS, where they disrupt the blood–brain barrier (BBB), promote demyelination, and amplify inflammatory responses [4246]. Conversely, neutrophils can exert protective roles, such as suppressing pathogenic B-cell responses [47] and promoting axon regeneration [4851]. While single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revealed neutrophil heterogeneity in MS and cEAE [4548, 52, 53], the diversity and function of these cells in btEAE remain poorly understood, revealing a critical knowledge gap relevant to disease mechanisms.
In this study, we generated mice with neutrophil-specific Socs3 deletion (Socs3ΔLy6G) to define the role of neutrophil-intrinsic JAK/STAT signaling in CNS autoimmunity. Socs3ΔLy6G mice developed both severe btEAE and cEAE, with the btEAE phenotype driven by Socs3-deficient neutrophils. Using single-cell transcriptomics, we identified distinct neutrophil subsets, including inflammatory clusters enriched in Socs3ΔLy6G mice during EAE. Importantly, Saa3 emerged as a candidate effector and potential therapeutic target. Together, these findings link dysregulated neutrophil JAK/STAT signaling to brain-targeted neuroinflammation and reveal a previously unappreciated mechanism of neutrophil-mediated pathology in MS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice. Transgenic mice with the Socs3 locus flanked with flox sequences (Socs3fl/fl) [54], the generous gift of Dr. Warren Alexander (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research; Victoria, Australia), were bred at UAB. Socs3ΔLysM mice were generated as previously described [25]. Mice with Socs3 deletion exclusively in neutrophils (Socs3ΔLy6G) were generated by serial breeding of Socs3fl/fl mice with Ly6gCreTdtomato/+ mice (“Catchup mice”) [55], a generous gift from Professor Matthias Gunzer, Institute for Experimental Immunology and Imaging, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. The highly neutrophil-specific locus for Ly6g was genetically modified to drive expression of both Cre-recombinase and tdTomato. Ly6G+/− mice serve as controls. All animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of UAB.
Human Plasma Samples. Subjects with MS and healthy controls (HC) were recruited from the UAB Comprehensive MS Center. Data were collected in a double-blinded manner until all data collection was completed. These studies were conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the Institutional Review Board at UAB. All participants provided informed consent. EDTA plasma was collected in BD Vacutainer EDTA tubes and stored at − 80°C [56]. Information on the MS patient population is summarized in Supplementary Table 1.
Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) Induction and Assessment. EAE was induced in Socs3fl/fl, Ly6G+/−, Socs3ΔLysM and Socs3ΔLy6G mice by s.c. injection of MOG35–55 emulsified in CFA (Hooke Laboratories) along with i.p. injection of 100 ng Pertussis Toxin (Hooke Laboratories) on Days 0 and 1, as previously described [25, 26, 57]. Mice experience cEAE, btEAE, and/or a mixed phenotype after EAE induction. cEAE was scored as follows: 0, no disease; 1, decreased tail tone; 2, hind limb weakness or partial paralysis; 3, complete hind limb paralysis; 4, front and hind limb paralysis; and 5, moribund state. Assessment of btEAE was as follows: 0, no disease; 1, hunched appearance, slight head tilt; 2, ataxia, scruffy coat; 3, severe head tilt, slight axial rotation, staggered walking; 4, severe axial rotation, spinning; and 5, moribund. For mixed phenotypes, cEAE and btEAE were scored separately [26]. Mice were sacrificed on days 12–14 at the peak of EAE for histology, flow cytometry and scRNA-Seq analysis. The CB and SC were isolated as previously described [26].
Assessment of Demyelination and NET Formation. Mice were anesthetized and intracardially perfused with PBS, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. CB tissues were fixed with 4% PFA at 4°C overnight and then dehydrated with 30% sucrose. Cryoprotected CB tissues were embedded in an Optimal Cutting Temperature compound and cryosectioned to produce 40 µm slices in the sagittal plane from the center. Sections were stained using the Black Gold II Myelin Staining Kit (Millipore Sigma, AG105) [26, 58]. Images of stained sections were acquired with the Keyence Microscope BZ-X800. The total arbor vitae (white matter) area and the myelinated area (area of black-gold staining) of the CB were measured using the “Hybrid Cell Count” module provided by Keyence Microscope. “% Cerebellar Myelination Area” was defined as the myelinated area divided by the total arbor vitae area. For assessment of NET formation, slides were stained for citrullinated histone 3 (citH3), a biomarker of NET formation, the neutrophil marker Ly6G, and DAPI.
Antibodies and Cytokines. For flow cytometry experiments, antibodies (Abs) directed against murine CD11b (M1/70), CD45 (30-F11), Ly6C (HK1.4), Ly6G (1A8), CXCR2 (SA044G4), CD62L (MEL-14), CD63 (NVG-2), CD3 (17A2), CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53 − 6.7), CD44 (IM7), IFN-γ (XMG1.2) and IL-17A (TC11-18H10.1) were from BioLegend (San Diego, CA). The LIVE/DEAD® Fixable Aqua Stain kit (L34957) was from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA).
Flow Cytometry. For surface protein detection, cells were incubated with Fc Block (2.4G2) for 15 min. and washed, followed by incubation with viability dye and the indicated Abs, as previously described [26]. CM-H2DCFDA, a general oxidative stress indicator, was used to detect total ROS production [59, 60]. For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were stimulated with PMA (25 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 µg/ml) in the presence of GolgiStop (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) for 4 h and permeabilized using the BD Fixation/Permeabilization Kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), as previously described [61].
For analysis of cells from the EAE experiments, mice were sacrificed and whole-body perfusion was performed. Mononuclear cells were isolated from the CB and SC using a 30%/70% Percoll gradient. Cell phenotypes were determined based on surface and intracellular staining patterns analyzed by flow cytometry, as previously described [23, 25, 26]. All flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo software (version 10.8.1; TreeStar, Ashland, OR).
Cytokine/Chemokine Analysis. The supernatant of CB and SC tissue homogenates was used to determine cytokine and chemokine levels as measured by the Cytokine/Chemokine Multiplex ELISA assay (Millipore, St. Louis, MO) as previously described [62]. Analyte concentrations were normalized by protein concentration.
Sorting of Neutrophils. Mononuclear cells were isolated from the CB and SC of Ly6G+/− or Socs3ΔLy6G EAE mice as previously described [24, 63]. CD45+CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow neutrophils were isolated by flow cytometry.
A
Quantitative RT-PCR. 500–1000 ng of RNA from sorted neutrophils was used as a template for cDNA synthesis. qRT-PCR was performed using TaqMan primers purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. The resulting data were analyzed using the comparative cycle threshold method to calculate relative RNA quantities [57].
ELISA. The murine SAA3 ELISA kit (EZMSAA3-12K; EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA determined the concentrations of SAA3 in murine plasma and supernatants from CB and SC tissue homogenates. The human SAA1 ELISA kit (DY3019-05; R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) detected human SAA1 in plasma samples from MS patients and HC. The Nu.Q® Discovery H3.1 ELISA kit (1001-01-03; Volition, Carlsbad, CA) quantified nucleosomes in plasma samples from MS patients and HC, as well as in murine plasma and supernatants of CB and SC tissue homogenates.
Cell Isolation and Single-cell RNA Sequencing (scRNA-Seq). Due to the scarcity of CD45+CD11b+ cells in the CB of naïve mice (both Ly6G+/− and Socs3ΔLy6G) and Ly6G+/− mice with cEAE, we could not perform scRNA-Seq on cells from the CB of these mice. Mononuclear immune cells were isolated from the SC of naïve Ly6G+/− or Socs3ΔLy6G mice, from the SC and CB at the peak of EAE disease at day 12 for Socs3ΔLy6G mice, or from the SC at the peak of EAE disease at day 14 for Ly6G+/− mice following anesthetization, intracardial PBS perfusion and a 30%/70% Percoll gradient separation [26]. Sorted live CD45+CD11b+ cells from the SC of Ly6G+/− mice with EAE (n = 3), from the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE (n = 3), and from the combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/− (n = 3), and naïve Socs3ΔLy6G (n = 4) mice were subjected to scRNA-Seq. One biological sample consisted of samples pooled from three mice with TotalSeq™-B Hashtag antibodies from BioLegend [64]. All sorted CD45+CD11b+ cell libraries were prepared using the 10X Genomics Chromium Single Cell 3′ Reagent Kit V3.1 and sequenced on Illumina NextSeq 500 as previously described [45, 47, 48, 65]. Raw base call files were demultiplexed into FASTQ files. Sequencing files were processed and mapped to mm10, and count matrices were extracted using the Cell Ranger Single Cell Software (v 7.1.0) [45, 66, 67].
scRNA-Seq Analysis. The count matrices in the h5 file format generated from Cell Ranger were imported into the Partek Flow (Partek Inc) pipeline [66, 68]. Single-cell quality control was performed by applying an inclusion filter on counts per cell (500-15000) and detected genes per cell (250–5000). Cells with greater than 10% mitochondrial gene expression were excluded to eliminate apoptotic or dying cells [69].
The dataset was also applied by setting the noise reduction filter to exclude features where the value ≤ 0 in at least 99.9% of cells. The filtered dataset was normalized and scaled with the SCTransform workflow. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed on the SCTransform-scaled data. The PCA data node was chosen to perform graph-based clustering based on the Louvain algorithm, with the number of PCA set to 20. The data was visualized using 3D Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) dimensional reduction with the first 20 principal components. Cell annotations for each cluster were determined using the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in computed biomarkers and canonical markers following the classification workflow in Partek Flow [66, 70].
CD45+CD11b+ cells from four conditions are as follows: combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/− (356 cells) and naïve Socs3ΔLy6G mice (795 cells); SC of Ly6G+/− EAE mice (4,106 cells); SC of Socs3ΔLy6G EAE mice (11,394 cells); and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G EAE mice (10,639 cells). The neutrophil clusters were subsetted from all of the cell clusters. Neutrophils from four different conditions are as follows: combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/− mice (114 cells) and naïve Socs3ΔLy6G mice (263 cells); SC of Ly6G+/− EAE mice (2,102 cells); SC of Socs3ΔLy6G EAE mice (6,458 cells); and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G EAE (6,914 cells). DEGs between different samples were determined by the Hurdle model on log2-normalized counts. The dot plots and violin plots were generated with sc.pl.dotplot and sc.pl.violin functions in Scanpy (1.9.1) package [71] using the annotated h5ad files exported from Partek workflow [66].
Pathway Enrichment Analysis. GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis): DEG analysis between individual neutrophils versus other neutrophil clusters was performed with Gene Specific Analysis (GSA) test in Partek workflow [66]. The exported DEG list was ranked by -log(P) and converted to an RNK file, which was uploaded to GSEA software (Version 4.3.2, BROAD Institute) to run GSEAPreRanked by choosing a hallmark gene sets database [72]. The pathway analysis results were plotted in terms of normalized enrichment score (NES) and false discovery rate (FDR) using the ggplot2 (Version 3.4.0) package in RStudio.
NicheNet Analysis. The annotated h5ad files were read into R using the anndata package. The Seurat object [73, 74] was created for NicheNet analysis. The expression data of interacting cells was extracted from the Seurat object of integrated data. Neu1, Neu2, Neu3, Neu4 and Neu5 clusters were defined as the sender cell populations and macrophages or microglia were defined as the receiver cell populations. One comparison of interest was Socs3ΔLy6G CB versus Ly6G+/− SC: the condition of interest was set to Socs3ΔLy6G CB and the reference condition was set to Ly6G+/− SC. NicheNet analysis was performed according to the published workflow utilizing published ligand-target, ligand-receptor network and weighted integrated networks [75]. The selected differentially expressed ligand or receptor was visualized in violin plots.
Statistics. Significant differences between the two groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test distribution. One-way ANOVA was used to compare differences between more than two samples, and the Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used for EAE scores. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).
Data Set Availability. ScRNA-Seq data will be available online. The single-cell data have been deposited in the GEO under the accession number GSE304332. Raw files supporting our findings are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
RESULTS
Mice with Targeted Deletion of Socs3 in Neutrophils Exhibit Brain-Targeted EAE. Our previous work established that Socs3ΔLysM mice develop severe btEAE [26], but Socs3 deletion in both neutrophils and macrophages precluded identifying the responsible cell type. To assess whether Socs3 deficiency in neutrophils induces brain-targeted neuroinflammation, mice with neutrophil-specific Socs3 deletion (Socs3ΔLy6G) were generated. Effective gene deletion was confirmed by genotyping and reduced Socs3 mRNA levels (data not shown). Ly6G+/− mice, used as controls, showed classical EAE scores similar to Socs3fl/fl mice (Fig. 1A) and did not develop brain-targeted EAE (btEAE), consistent with previous findings [26]. Socs3ΔLy6G mice developed both severe btEAE and cEAE (Fig. 1B–C), with scores and survival curves closely matching those of Socs3ΔLysM mice (Fig. 1C–D). Antibody-mediated neutrophil depletion reduced btEAE severity (Fig. 1E) but did not affect cEAE (data not shown), indicating that neutrophils are required for the brain-targeted disease phenotype. Neutrophil-specific Socs3 deletion is sufficient to induce the mixed btEAE/cEAE phenotype previously observed in myeloid-specific knockout mice, establishing neutrophils as essential mediators of btEAE.
Cerebellar Demyelination and Immune Cell Infiltration in Socs3ΔLy6G Mice.
Due to the neurological manifestations of btEAE, cerebellar pathology and immune cell infiltration were evaluated in Socs3ΔLy6G mice. Black Gold staining demonstrated severe cerebellar demyelination at the peak of disease, with the myelinated area reduced to approximately 27% compared to 85% in controls (Fig. 2A–B). Flow cytometry confirmed increased total immune cell infiltration in the CB (Fig. 2C). There was an expansion of CD45hiCD11b⁺ myeloid cells and a reduction in CD45loCD11b⁺ microglia (Fig. 2D). Multiplex cytokine analysis of cerebellar homogenates revealed elevated G-CSF, IL-1α, IL-1β, CXCL2, TNF-α, GM-CSF, and CCL2 (Fig. 2E). These patterns indicate a pronounced pro-inflammatory environment. Socs3ΔLy6G mice exhibit pathology characterized by demyelination and a substantial inflammatory infiltrate, demonstrating that neutrophil-specific Socs3 loss establishes a pathogenic immune environment in the cerebellum.
Neutrophil Activation and NET Formation.
The activation state and functional properties of cerebellar neutrophils were investigated in Socs3ΔLy6G mice. Flow cytometry showed CD11b upregulation and CD62L downregulation, while CXCR4 and CXCR2 levels stayed unchanged (Fig. 3A). Both the frequency and absolute number of cerebellar neutrophils increased compared to controls, which exhibited few neutrophils in the cerebellum (Fig. 3B–C). Socs3ΔLy6G neutrophils showed increased ROS production (Fig. 3D) and higher mRNA expression of inflammatory mediators (Fig. 3E). In inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, neutrophils release NETs, exacerbating tissue damage during sustained inflammation [7680]. Immunofluorescence for citrullinated histone H3 demonstrated clear NET formation in cerebellar lesions (Fig. 3F), with increased nucleosome release in plasma (Fig. 3G) and cerebellar tissue (Fig. 3H) of Socs3ΔLy6G mice. Socs3 deficiency induces a hyperactivated, pro-inflammatory neutrophil phenotype characterized by NET formation, indicating that these cells are key effectors of CNS inflammation and demyelination.
Spinal Cord Inflammation.
Given that Socs3ΔLy6G mice exhibited cEAE symptoms, spinal cord (SC) pathology was also assessed. Flow cytometry indicated increased total infiltrates (Supplementary Fig. 1A), with a rise in CD11b⁺ myeloid cells and fewer microglia (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Socs3ΔLy6G neutrophil frequency and numbers increased in the SC compared to controls (Supplementary Fig. 1C–D). Also, nucleosome levels were higher in both Socs3ΔLy6G and control EAE SCs compared to naïve mice (Supplementary Fig. 1E). Neutrophil activation and NET formation were observed in both SC and CB. This suggests that Socs3-deficient neutrophils contribute to CNS inflammation in multiple anatomical regions.
Th1 CD4+ T-cells Predominate in Socs3ΔLy6G Mice.
To determine whether neutrophil-driven inflammation influences adaptive immunity, T-cell subsets were profiled in the CB and SC. Socs3ΔLy6G mice exhibited increased total CD4⁺ T-cell numbers in the CB (Supplementary Fig. 2A). There was a significant elevation in IFN-γ–producing T helper 1 (Th1) cells (Supplementary Fig. 2B). A similar Th1 bias was observed in the SC (Supplementary Fig. 2C–D). Neutrophil-specific Socs3 deletion promotes a shift of CD4⁺ T-cells toward the Th1 phenotype, establishing a link between neutrophil activation and adaptive immune polarization in CNS autoimmunity.
scRNA-Seq Reveals Neutrophil Heterogeneity and Expansion of Inflammatory Subsets in Socs3ΔLy6G Mice.
To study transcriptional heterogeneity in neutrophils, we performed scRNA-Seq on CNS-infiltrating cells from Socs3ΔLy6G and control EAE mice. Cell clusters were annotated with top differentially expressed gene markers and canonical markers for neutrophils, macrophages, microglia, dendritic cells, T-cells and B-cells (Supplementary Fig. 3A). Unsupervised clustering found five neutrophil subsets (Neu1–Neu5) based on gene markers (Supplementary Fig. 3A–B).
Neu1 was a quiescent group enriched in naïve SC, while Neu2–Neu4 had inflammatory signatures (Fig. 4A–D). Neu2 expressed Saa3, Il1b, Id2, Chil3, Csf3r, Hist1h2bc, and Klhl6. Neu3 expressed Ccl3 and Ccl4. Neu4 showed an interferon and chemokine profile including Saa3, Il1b, Cxcl2, Cxcl3, Cd14, Ifit1, Isg20, and Isg15 (Fig. 4C–D and Supplementary Fig. 4A–B). The top 20 marker genes from each Neu cluster are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4A. In Socs3ΔLy6G mice, Neu2 and Neu4 clusters expanded in both CB and SC, while Neu1 was nearly absent (Fig. 4A–B). The Neu5 cluster was detected at very low percentages in all four conditions (1–2%) (Fig. 4B). Gene set enrichment showed IFNα/γ response, IL-6–JAK–STAT3, TNFα–NF-κB, and general inflammatory pathways across Neu2-5, with Neu4 most enriched for these signatures (Fig. 4E). Collectively, transcriptomic analysis reveals inflammatory neutrophil subsets expanded by Socs3 loss, with increased STAT3- and NF-κB-driven gene programs likely driving CNS pathology.
Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Saa3 as One of the Highly Upregulated Genes in Socs3ΔLy6G Mice.
DEG analysis revealed the top 20 upregulated genes in the four conditions (Fig. 5A). Saa3, Id2, Ly6a, Ifi207, Ifi204, Fcgr4, Ctss, Ifitm1 and Isg15 were increased in the SC of Ly6G+/− mice compared to the SC of naïve mice (Fig. 5A–B). Saa3, Id2, Chil3, Ly6a, Prnp, Entpd3, Cxcl2, Mmp19, Ifi207, Ifi204, Egr1, Acadl and Cd14 expression was elevated in the SC of Socs3ΔLy6G mice compared to Ly6G+/− mice (Fig. 5A–C). Ly6a, Entpd3, Klhl6, Ifi207 and Ifi204 were increased in the CB compared to the SC of Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Fig. 5A–B). Strikingly, Saa3 was markedly upregulated in neutrophils from the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice compared to Ly6G+/− (Fig. 5A–B). Cd14 and Cd274 expression was elevated in neutrophils from the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Fig. 5C).
Differential gene expression analysis identified Saa3 as one of the most highly induced genes in Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Fig. 5A–C). Saa3, with Id2, Chil3, Cxcl2, Mmp19, Ifi204, and Cd14, was upregulated in both SC and CB. CB neutrophils had even higher Saa3 expression. Saa3 transcripts were especially high in the Neu2–Neu4 clusters (Fig. 4C and Supplementary Fig. 6). GSEA confirmed robust activation of inflammatory cytokine and interferon pathways associated with Saa3. Saa3 serves as a marker of Socs3-deficient inflammatory neutrophils and may mediate amplification of neuroinflammation.
Neutrophil-Macrophage/Microglia Interactions.
To investigate intercellular communication underlying CNS inflammation, ligand–receptor analysis was conducted between neutrophils and macrophage/microglia [75]. Upregulation of Ccl4 in Neu2/Neu4 and Ccr1/Ccr5 in macrophages/microglia predicted enhanced myeloid recruitment (Supplementary Fig. 5A–C). Saa3 also increased in neutrophils and macrophages, while Tlr4 and Tlr2 rose in macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 5D–E, 5G). Saa3 can activate TLR2/TLR4 to boost cytokine production [8184]. These results suggest neutrophil-derived Saa3 activates macrophages and initiates a self-reinforcing inflammatory circuit. Saa3 induces a strong up-regulation of Saa3 transcripts, indicating the self-amplifying potential of Saa3 [85]. Socs3-deficient neutrophils promote pro-inflammatory crosstalk with macrophages via Saa3–TLR2/TLR4 signaling, establishing a feed-forward loop that sustains CNS inflammation.
Saa3 Expression is Markedly Elevated in Socs3ΔLy6G Mice.
Transcriptomic analysis confirmed substantial Saa3 upregulation in the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice relative to controls (Fig. 6A). Saa3 was most highly expressed in the Neu2, Neu3, Neu4, and Neu5 clusters, with the highest expression in the Neu4 cluster (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Fig. 4C–D), and was also expressed by macrophages and microglia (Supplementary Fig. 6). RT–PCR confirmed elevated Saa3 transcripts in neutrophils isolated from both CB and SC of Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Fig. 6B–C). At the protein level, Saa3 expression was increased in CB and SC homogenates and plasma from both Socs3ΔLy6G and Ly6G+/− mice with EAE compared to their corresponding naïve mice (Fig. 6D–F). The systemic Saa3 rise shows that neutrophil-specific Socs3 deficiency induces both local and peripheral inflammation. Saa3 upregulation reflects widespread inflammatory activation following Socs3 deletion and may serve as a biomarker of disease activity.
SAA1 and NET Formation are Elevated in MS Patients.
To assess translational relevance, we analyzed serum from MS patients. Plasma SAA1, the human ortholog of mouse Saa3, was higher than in healthy controls (Fig. 7A). Circulating nucleosome levels, which mark NET formation, were also higher (Fig. 7B). These findings match reports of neutrophil hyperactivation in MS [39, 41, 86]. Increased SAA1 and NET markers in MS patients mirror the Socs3ΔLy6G mouse phenotype. This links neutrophil-driven Saa3/SAA1 signaling to human CNS autoimmunity and points to therapeutic and diagnostic potential.
DISCUSSION
Neutrophils are increasingly recognized as active regulators of neuroinflammation rather than passive bystanders. Here, we demonstrate that loss of Socs3 in neutrophils alone (Socs3ΔLy6G mice) drives a severe btEAE, which features cerebellar neutrophil infiltration, amplified inflammatory signaling, elevated ROS and NET formation, and extensive demyelination. Notably, depleting neutrophils completely prevented disease, establishing them as primary drivers of the brain-directed phenotype.
Single-cell transcriptomic analysis identified marked neutrophil heterogeneity within the CNS during EAE. We found five transcriptionally distinct clusters (Neu1–5) across naïve and diseased mice and observed expansion of the Neu2 and Neu4 populations in Socs3ΔLy6G mice. The Neu4 cluster, which increased in both the SC and CB, showed enrichment for JAK/STAT and NF-κB signaling as well as interferon responses (IFNα, IFNγ). This transcriptional profile resembles interferon-stimulated neutrophil subsets previously observed in infection, autoimmunity, and chronic inflammation [8791], pointing to a conserved inflammatory program engaged by Socs3 deficiency.
NETs contribute to the pathogenesis of MS [79]. NETs disrupt the BBB, promote leukocyte infiltration, and exacerbate demyelination [53, 92]. Consistent with this, cerebellar neutrophils from Socs3ΔLy6G mice released abundant NETs, accompanied by elevated expression of interferon-stimulated genes and chemokines such as Cxcl2 (Fig. 5A–B), both of which promote NET formation [93, 94]. We also identified elevated circulating nucleosomes in the plasma of MS patients compared with healthy controls (Fig. 7B), further supporting the translational relevance of NETs as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets.
A notable finding showed strong Saa3 activation in neutrophils from Socs3ΔLy6G mice (Fig. 5A–B, 6A), with expression also seen in microglia and macrophages (Supplemental Fig. 6). Saa3 levels increased in SC and CB neutrophils from Socs3ΔLy6G mice compared with controls, indicating a role in brain targeting. Since Saa3 signals through TLR2 and TLR4, both of which are upregulated in Socs3ΔLy6G macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 5E, 5G), our data support a feed-forward inflammatory loop between neutrophils and myeloid cells. Previous studies found that SAA-deficient mice develop delayed or milder EAE [95], highlighting the pathogenic role of this pathway. Similarly, plasma SAA1 levels were higher in MS patients than in controls (Fig. 7A), linking the murine Saa3 axis to human disease.
Mechanistically, SOCS3 negatively regulates both NF-κB [96, 97], and JAK/STAT3 signaling [20, 22, 98], which are known drivers of Saa3 expression [99103]. Therefore, loss of Socs3 removes these inhibitory controls, leading to persistent activation of these signaling pathways, upregulated Saa3 production, and amplification of inflammatory signals. SAA proteins, whose production is increased as a result, can cross and impair the intact BBB. Thus, the Socs3-deficient state promotes a mechanistic cascade from enhanced signaling and Saa3 production to disruption of the BBB and CNS pathology in MS.
Collectively, our findings designate neutrophils as active effectors of autoimmune neuroinflammation. Socs3 loss triggers neutrophil activation, ROS and NET release, and Saa3 upregulation, establishing a proinflammatory circuit that drives cerebellar demyelination. By resolving neutrophil heterogeneity and defining transcriptional programs in EAE, this study highlights the Saa3/SAA1 axis as both a biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for modulating CNS autoimmunity.
Abbreviations
AD (Alzheimer’s Disease)
BBB (blood
brain barrier)
btEAE (brain
targeted EAE)
CB (cerebellum)
cEAE (classical EAE)
CNS (central nervous system)
DEGs (differentially expressed genes)
EAE (Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis)
FDR (false discovery rate)
GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis)
HC (healthy controls)
ISG (interferon
stimulated gene)
JAK (Janus Kinase)
MS (Multiple Sclerosis)
NES (normalized enrichment score)
NETs (neutrophil extracellular traps)
PCA (Principal Component Analysis)
PD (Parkinson’s Disease)
PTX (Pertussis Toxin)
SAA (Serum Amyloid A)
Saa3 (Serum Amyloid A3)
SC (spinal cord)
scRNA
Seq (single-cell RNA Sequencing)
SOCS (Suppressors Of Cytokine Signaling)
STAT (Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription)
UMAP (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection)
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material
A
Author Contribution
Y.W., W.J.T., H.Q., R.S.W., and E.N.B. designed the experiments and wrote the main manuscript. W.R.M. and C.R. provide the human samples and patient information. Y.W., W.J.T., L.Z., Z.Y., S.B.P., W.Y., Z.L., J.A.B., and H.Q. performed the experiments and analyzed the data.
A
Data Availability
ScRNA-Seq data will be available online. The single-cell data have been deposited in the GEO under the accession number GSE304332. Raw files supporting our findings are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES:
1.
Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF, Calabresi PA. Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:169–80.
2.
Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, Hemmer B, Ciccarelli O. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2018;391:1622–36.
3.
Attfield KE, Jensen LT, Kaufmann M, Friese MA, Fugger L. The immunology of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22:734–50.
4.
Jakimovski D, Bittner S, Zivadinov R, Morrow SA, Benedict RH, Zipp F, Weinstock-Guttman B. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2024;403:183–202.
5.
Hemmer B, Kerschensteiner M, Korn T. Role of the innate and adaptive immune responses in the course of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:406–19.
6.
Robinson AP, Harp CT, Noronha A, Miller SD. The experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS: utility for understanding disease pathophysiology and treatment. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;122:173–89.
7.
Manouchehri N, Salinas VH, Hussain RZ, Stuve O. Distinctive transcriptomic and epigenomic signatures of bone marrow-derived myeloid cells and microglia in CNS autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120:e2212696120.
8.
Yan Z, Gibson SA, Buckley JA, Qin H, Benveniste EN. Role of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in regulation of innate immunity in neuroinflammatory diseases. Clin Immunol 2016, pii: S1521-6616 (16) 30449-1.
9.
Morris R, Kershaw NJ, Babon JJ. The molecular details of cytokine signaling via the JAK/STAT pathway. Protein Sci. 2018;27:1984–2009.
10.
Jain M, Singh MK, Shyam H, Mishra A, Kumar S, Kumar A, Kushwaha J. Role of JAK/STAT in the neuroinflammation and its association with neurological disorders. Ann Neurosci. 2021;28:191–200.
11.
Hu Q, Bian Q, Rong D, Wang L, Song J, Huang HS, Zeng J, Mei J, Wang PY. JAK/STAT pathway: Extracellular signals, diseases, immunity, and therapeutic regimens. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1110765.
12.
Frisullo G, Angelucci F, Caggiula M, Nociti V, Iorio R, Patanella AK, Sancricca C, Mirabella M, Tonali PA, Batocchi AP. pSTAT1, pSTAT3, and T-bet expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients correlates with disease activity. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84:1027–36.
13.
Canto E, Isobe N, Didonna A, Group M-ES, Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR. Aberrant STAT phosphorylation signaling in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:72.
14.
Lee PW, Smith AJ, Yang Y, Selhorst AJ, Liu Y, Racke MK, Lovett-Racke AE. IL-23R-activated STAT3/STAT4 is essential for Th1/Th17-mediated CNS autoimmunity. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e91663.
15.
Schneider A, Long SA, Cerosaletti K, Ni CT, Samuels P, Kita M, Buckner JH. In active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, effector T cell resistance to adaptive T(regs) involves IL-6-mediated signaling. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:170ra115.
16.
Lu JQ, Power C, Blevins G, Giuliani F, Yong VW. The regulation of reactive changes around multiple sclerosis lesions by phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2013;72:1135–44.
17.
Cianciulli A, Calvello R, Porro C, Trotta T, Panaro MA. Understanding the role of SOCS signaling in neurodegenerative diseases: Current and emerging concepts. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2017;37:67–79.
18.
Sobah ML, Liongue C, Ward AC. SOCS Proteins in Immunity, Inflammatory Diseases, and Immune-Related Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:727987.
19.
Pandey R, Bakay M, Hakonarson H. SOCS-JAK-STAT inhibitors and SOCS mimetics as treatment options for autoimmune uveitis, psoriasis, lupus, and autoimmune encephalitis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1271102.
20.
Lynch DM, Forrester B, Webb T, Ciulli A. Unravelling the druggability and immunological roles of the SOCS-family proteins. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1449397.
21.
Frisullo G, Mirabella M, Angelucci F, Caggiula M, Morosetti R, Sancricca C, Patanella AK, Nociti V, Iorio R, Bianco A, et al. The effect of disease activity on leptin, leptin receptor and suppressor of cytokine signalling-3 expression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;192:174–83.
22.
Toghi M, Taheri M, Arsang-Jang S, Ohadi M, Mirfakhraie R, Mazdeh M, Sayad A. SOCS gene family expression profile in the blood of multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol Sci. 2017;375:481–5.
23.
Liu Y, Holdbrooks AT, De Sarno P, Rowse AL, Yanagisawa LL, McFarland BC, Harrington LE, Raman C, Sabbaj S, Benveniste EN, Qin H. Therapeutic efficacy of suppressing the JAK/STAT pathway in multiple models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2014;192:59–72.
24.
Liu Y, Holdbrooks AT, Meares GP, Buckley JA, Benveniste EN, Qin H. Preferential recruitment of neutrophils into the cerebellum and brainstem contributes to the atypical experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis phenotype. J Immunol. 2015;195:841–52.
25.
Qin H, Yeh W-I, De Sarno P, Holdbrooks AT, Liu Y, Muldowney MT, Reynolds SL, Yanagisawa LL, Fox THI, Park K, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3/suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (STAT3/SOCS3) axis in myeloid cells regulates neuroinflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:5004–9.
26.
Yan Z, Yang W, Parkitny L, Gibson SA, Lee KS, Collins F, Deshane JS, Cheng W, Weinmann AS, Wei H, et al. Deficiency of Socs3 leads to brain-targeted EAE via enhanced neutrophil activation and ROS production. JCI Insight. 2019;5:e126520.
27.
Simmons SB, Liggitt D, Goverman JM. Cytokine-regulated neutrophil recruitment is required for brain but not spinal cord inflammation during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2014;193:555–63.
28.
Pierson ER, Goverman JM. GM-CSF is not essential for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis but promotes brain-targeted disease. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e92362.
29.
De Bondt M, Hellings N, Opdenakker G, Struyf S. Neutrophils: Underestimated players in the pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:4558.
30.
Woodberry T, Bouffler SE, Wilson AS, Buckland RL, Brustle A. The emerging role of neutrophil granulocytes in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Med. 2018;7:511.
31.
Pierson ER, Wagner CA, Goverman JM. The contribution of neutrophils to CNS autoimmunity. Clin Immunol. 2018;189:23–8.
32.
Wingerchuk DM, Lucchinetti CF. Comparative immunopathogenesis of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neuromyelitis optica, and multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20:343–50.
33.
Rumble JM, Huber AK, Krishnamoorthy G, Srinivasan A, Giles DA, Zhang X, Wang L, Segal BM. Neutrophil-related factors as biomarkers in EAE and MS. J Exp Med. 2015;212:23–35.
34.
Chakraborty S, Tabrizi Z, Bhatt NN, Franciosa SA, Bracko O. A Brief Overview of Neutrophils in Neurological Diseases. Biomolecules 2023, 13.
35.
Aries ML, Hensley-McBain T. Neutrophils as a potential therapeutic target in Alzheimer's disease. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1123149.
36.
Zenaro E, Pietronigro E, Della Bianca V, Piacentino G, Marongiu L, Budui S, Turano E, Rossi B, Angiari S, Dusi S, et al. Neutrophils promote Alzheimer's disease-like pathology and cognitive decline via LFA-1 integrin. Nat Med. 2015;21:880–6.
37.
Munoz-Delgado L, Macias-Garcia D, Perinan MT, Jesus S, Adarmes-Gomez AD, Bonilla Toribio M, Buiza Rueda D, Jimenez-Jaraba MDV, Benitez Zamora B, Diaz Belloso R, et al. Peripheral inflammatory immune response differs among sporadic and familial Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2023;9:12.
38.
Zhang F, Chen B, Ren W, Yan Y, Zheng X, Jin S, Chang Y. Association analysis of dopaminergic degeneration and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in Parkinson's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2024;16:1377994.
39.
Naegele M, Tillack K, Reinhardt S, Schippling S, Martin R, Sospedra M. Neutrophils in multiple sclerosis are characterized by a primed phenotype. J Neuroimmunol. 2012;242:60–71.
40.
Hertwig L, Pache F, Romero-Suarez S, Sturner KH, Borisow N, Behrens J, Bellmann-Strobl J, Seeger B, Asselborn N, Ruprecht K, et al. Distinct functionality of neutrophils in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. Mult Scler. 2016;22:160–73.
41.
Tillack K, Naegele M, Haueis C, Schippling S, Wandinger KP, Martin R, Sospedra M. Gender differences in circulating levels of neutrophil extracellular traps in serum of multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. 2013;261:108–19.
42.
Rossi B, Constantin G, Zenaro E. The emerging role of neutrophils in neurodegeneration. Immunobiol. 2020;225:151865.
43.
Khaw YM, Cunningham C, Tierney A, Sivaguru M, Inoue M. Neutrophil-selective deletion of Cxcr2 protects against CNS neurodegeneration in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:49.
44.
Grist JJ, Marro BS, Skinner DD, Syage AR, Worne C, Doty DJ, Fujinami RS, Lane TE. Induced CNS expression of CXCL1 augments neurologic disease in a murine model of multiple sclerosis via enhanced neutrophil recruitment. Eur J Immunol. 2018;48:1199–210.
45.
Skinner DD, Syage AR, Olivarria GM, Stone C, Hoglin B, Lane TE. Sustained infiltration of neutrophils into the CNS results in increased demyelination in a viral-induced model of multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:931388.
46.
Shi K, Li H, Chang T, He W, Kong Y, Qi C, Li R, Huang H, Zhu Z, Zheng P, et al. Bone marrow hematopoiesis drives multiple sclerosis progression. Cell. 2022;185:2234–e22472217.
47.
Knier B, Hiltensperger M, Sie C, Aly L, Lepennetier G, Engleitner T, Garg G, Muschaweckh A, Mitsdorffer M, Koedel U, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells control B cell accumulation in the central nervous system during autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. 2018;19:1341–51.
48.
Sas AR, Carbajal KS, Jerome AD, Menon R, Yoon C, Kalinski AL, Giger RJ, Segal BM. A new neutrophil subset promotes CNS neuron survival and axon regeneration. Nat Immunol. 2020;21:1496–505.
49.
Jerome AD, Atkinson JR, McVey Moffatt AL, Sepeda JA, Segal BM, Sas AR. Characterization of zymosan-modulated neutrophils with neuroregenerative properties. Front Immunol. 2022;13:912193.
50.
Jerome AD, Sas AR, Wang Y, Hammond LA, Wen J, Atkinson JR, Webb A, Liu T, Segal BM. Cytokine polarized, alternatively activated bone marrow neutrophils drive axon regeneration. Nat Immunol. 2024;25:957–68.
51.
Ng LG, Ostuni R, Hidalgo A. Heterogeneity of neutrophils. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:255–65.
52.
Quan M, Zhang H, Han X, Ba Y, Cui X, Bi Y, Yi L, Li B. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals transcriptional landscape of neutrophils and highlights the role of TREM-1 in EAE. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024;11:e200278.
53.
Shen S, Wu S, Wang Y, Xiao L, Sun X, Sun W, Zhao Y, Li R, Zhang J, Wang Z, et al. Temporal dynamics of neutrophil functions in multiple sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis. 2024;203:106744.
54.
Croker BA, Krebs DL, Zhang J-G, Wormald S, Willson TA, Stanley EG, Robb L, Greenhalgh CJ, Förster I, Clausen BE, et al. SOCS3 negatively regulates IL-6 signaling in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:540–5.
55.
Hasenberg A, Hasenberg M, Mann L, Neumann F, Borkenstein L, Stecher M, Kraus A, Engel DR, Klingberg A, Seddigh P, et al. Catchup: a mouse model for imaging-based tracking and modulation of neutrophil granulocytes. Nat Methods. 2015;12:445–52.
56.
Tuck MK, Chan DW, Chia D, Godwin AK, Grizzle WE, Krueger KE, Rom W, Sanda M, Sorbara L, Stass S, et al. Standard operating procedures for serum and plasma collection: early detection research network consensus statement standard operating procedure integration working group. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:113–7.
57.
Gibson SA, Yang W, Yan Z, Liu Y, Rowse AL, Weinmann AS, Qin H, Benveniste EN. Protein kinase CK2 controls the fate between Th17 cell and regulatory T cell differentiation. J Immunol. 2017;198:4244–54.
58.
Liu L, Belkadi A, Darnall L, Hu T, Drescher C, Cotleur AC, Padovani-Claudio D, He T, Choi K, Lane TE, et al. CXCR2-positive neutrophils are essential for cuprizone-induced demyelination: relevance to multiple sclerosis. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:319–26.
59.
Steinbach K, Piedavent M, Bauer S, Neumann JT, Friese MA. Neutrophils amplify autoimmune central nervous system infiltrates by maturing local APCs. J Immunol. 2013;191:4531–9.
60.
Noubade R, Wong K, Ota N, Rutz S, Eidenschenk C, Valdez PA, Ding J, Peng I, Sebrell A, Caplazi P, et al. NRROS negatively regulates reactive oxygen species during host defence and autoimmunity. Nature. 2014;509:235–9.
61.
Gibson SA, Yang W, Yan Z, Qin H, Benveniste EN. CK2 controls Th17 and regulatory T cell differentiation through inhibition of FoxO1. J Immunol. 2018;201:383–92.
62.
Yang W, Gibson SA, Yan Z, Wei H, Tao J, Sha B, Qin H, Benveniste EN. Protein kinase 2 (CK2) controls CD4(+) T cell effector function in the pathogenesis of colitis. Mucosal Immunol. 2020;13:788–98.
63.
Qin H, Holdbrooks AT, Liu Y, Reynolds SL, Yanagisawa LL, Benveniste EN. SOCS3 deficiency promotes M1 macrophage polarization and inflammation. J Immunol. 2012;189:3439–48.
64.
Lawlor N, Nehar-Belaid D, Grassmann JDS, Stoeckius M, Smibert P, Stitzel ML, Pascual V, Banchereau J, Williams A, Ucar D. Single cell analysis of blood mononuclear cells stimulated through either LPS or anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. Front Immunol. 2021;12:636720.
65.
Goel P, Aryal S, Franceski AM, Kuznetsova V, Costa AFO, Luca F, Connelly AN, Phillips DW, Ennis CC, Curtiss BM, et al. The acute myeloid leukemia microenvironment impairs neutrophil maturation and function through NFkappaB signaling. Blood. 2025;146:1707–21.
66.
Hong H, Wang Y, Menard M, Buckley JA, Zhou L, Volpicelli-Daley L, Standaert DG, Qin H, Benveniste EN. Suppression of the JAK/STAT pathway inhibits neuroinflammation in the line 61-PFF mouse model of Parkinson's disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2024;21:216.
67.
Eisenstein M. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis software providers scramble to offer solutions. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:254–7.
68.
Andueza A, Kumar S, Kim J, Kang DW, Mumme HL, Perez JI, Villa-Roel N, Jo H. Endothelial reprogramming by disturbed flow revealed by single-cell RNA and chromatin accessibility study. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108491.
69.
Luecken MD, Theis FJ. Current best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: a tutorial. Mol Syst Biol. 2019;15:e8746.
70.
Heumos L, Schaar AC, Lance C, Litinetskaya A, Drost F, Zappia L, Lucken MD, Strobl DC, Henao J, Curion F, et al. Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities. Nat Rev Genet. 2023;24:550–72.
71.
Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 2018;19:15.
72.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–50.
73.
Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:411–20.
74.
Papalexi E, Satija R. Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore immune cell heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:35–45.
75.
Browaeys R, Saelens W, Saeys Y. NicheNet: modeling intercellular communication by linking ligands to target genes. Nat Methods. 2020;17:159–62.
76.
Castanheira FVS, Kubes P. Neutrophils and NETs in modulating acute and chronic inflammation. Blood. 2019;133:2178–85.
77.
Grayson PC, Kaplan MJ. At the Bench: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) highlight novel aspects of innate immune system involvement in autoimmune diseases. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;99:253–64.
78.
Manda-Handzlik A, Demkow U. The brain entangled: The contribution of neutrophil extracellular traps to the diseases of the central nervous system. Cells. 2019;8:1477.
79.
Quan M, Zhang H, Deng X, Liu H, Xu Y, Song X. Neutrophils, NETs and multiple sclerosis: a mini review. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1487814.
80.
Wigerblad G, Kaplan MJ. Neutrophil extracellular traps in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23:274–88.
81.
Sanada Y, Yamamoto T, Satake R, Yamashita A, Kanai S, Kato N, van de Loo FA, Nishimura F, Scherer PE, Yanaka N. Serum amyloid A3 gene expression in adipocytes is an indicator of the interaction with macrophages. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38697.
82.
Hiratsuka S, Watanabe A, Sakurai Y, Akashi-Takamura S, Ishibashi S, Miyake K, Shibuya M, Akira S, Aburatani H, Maru Y. The S100A8-serum amyloid A3-TLR4 paracrine cascade establishes a pre-metastatic phase. Nat Cell Biol 2008.
83.
Zhang G, Liu J, Wu L, Fan Y, Sun L, Qian F, Chen D, Ye RD. Elevated Expression of Serum amyloid A3 protects colon epithelium against acute injury through TLR2-dependent induction of neutrophil IL-22 expression in a Mouse Model of Colitis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1503.
84.
Lee JM, Kim EK, Seo H, Jeon I, Chae MJ, Park YJ, Song B, Kim YS, Kim YJ, Ko HJ, Kang CY. Serum amyloid A3 exacerbates cancer by enhancing the suppressive capacity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells via TLR2-dependent STAT3 activation. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44:1672–84.
85.
Verstraelen P, Van Remoortel S, De Loose N, Verboven R, Garcia-Diaz Barriga G, Christmann A, Gries M, Bessho S, Li J, Guerra C, et al. Serum amyloid A3 fuels a feed-forward inflammatory response to the bacterial amyloid curli in the enteric nervous system. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;18:89–104.
86.
Ristori G, Laurenti F, Stacchini P, Gasperini C, Buttinelli C, Pozzilli C, Salvetti M. Serum amyloid A protein is elevated in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 1998;88:9–12.
87.
Xie X, Shi Q, Wu P, Zhang X, Kambara H, Su J, Yu H, Park SY, Guo R, Ren Q, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals neutrophil heterogeneity in homeostasis and infection. Nat Immunol. 2020;21:1119–33.
88.
Garrido-Trigo A, Corraliza AM, Veny M, Dotti I, Melon-Ardanaz E, Rill A, Crowell HL, Corbi A, Gudino V, Esteller M, et al. Macrophage and neutrophil heterogeneity at single-cell spatial resolution in human inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Commun. 2023;14:4506.
89.
Yao X, Redekar NR, Keeran KJ, Qu X, Jeffries KR, Soria-Florido MT, Saxena A, Dagur PK, Lin WC, McCoy JP, Levine SJ. Neutrophil Heterogeneity Is Modified during Acute Lung Inflammation in Apoa1-/- Mice. J Immunol. 2024;213:456–68.
90.
Kapellos TS, Bassler K, Fujii W, Nalkurthi C, Schaar AC, Bonaguro L, Pecht T, Galvao I, Agrawal S, Saglam A, et al. Systemic alterations in neutrophils and their precursors in early-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cell Rep. 2023;42:112525.
91.
Grieshaber-Bouyer R, Radtke FA, Cunin P, Stifano G, Levescot A, Vijaykumar B, Nelson-Maney N, Blaustein RB, Monach PA, Nigrovic PA, ImmGen C. The neutrotime transcriptional signature defines a single continuum of neutrophils across biological compartments. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2856.
92.
Nowaczewska-Kuchta A, Ksiazek-Winiarek D, Szpakowski P, Glabinski A. The Role of Neutrophils in Multiple Sclerosis and Ischemic Stroke. Brain Sci 2024, 14.
93.
Martinelli S, Urosevic M, Daryadel A, Oberholzer PA, Baumann C, Fey MF, Dummer R, Simon HU, Yousefi S. Induction of genes mediating interferon-dependent extracellular trap formation during neutrophil differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:44123–32.
94.
Pylaeva E, Bordbari S, Spyra I, Decker AS, Haussler S, Vybornov V, Lang S, Jablonska J. Detrimental effect of type I IFNs during acute lung infection with pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated through the stimulation of neutrophil NETosis. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2190.
95.
Lee JY, Hall JA, Kroehling L, Wu L, Najar T, Nguyen HH, Lin WY, Yeung ST, Silva HM, Li D, et al. Serum amyloid A proteins induce pathogenic Th17 cells and promote inflammatory disease. Cell. 2020;180:79–e9116.
96.
Chhabra JK, Chattopadhyay B, Paul BN. SOCS3 dictates the transition of divergent time-phased events in granulocyte TNF-alpha signaling. Cell Mol Immunol. 2014;11:105–6.
97.
Sood V, Lata S, Ramachandran VG, Banerjea AC. Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) degrades p65 and regulate HIV-1 replication. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:114.
98.
Croker BA, Metcalf D, Robb L, Wei W, Mifsud S, DiRago L, Cluse LA, Sutherland KD, Hartley L, Williams E, et al. SOCS3 is a critical physiological negative regulator of G-CSF signaling and emergency granulopoiesis. Immunity. 2004;20:153–65.
99.
Zhang C, Li Q, Xu Q, Dong W, Li C, Deng B, Gong J, Zhang LZ, Jin J. Pulmonary interleukin 1 beta/serum amyloid A3 axis promotes lung metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by facilitating the pre-metastatic niche formation. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42:166.
100.
Son DS, Roby KF, Terranova PF. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces serum amyloid A3 in mouse granulosa cells. Endocrinology. 2004;145:2245–52.
101.
Tannock LR, De Beer MC, Ji A, Shridas P, Noffsinger VP, den Hartigh L, Chait A, De Beer FC, Webb NR. Serum amyloid A3 is a high density lipoprotein-associated acute-phase protein. J Lipid Res. 2018;59:339–47.
102.
Mohanty T, Milicevic K, Gothert H, Tillmann A, Padra M, Papareddy P, Herwald H. Balancing inflammation: the specific roles of serum amyloid A proteins in sterile and infectious diseases. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1544085.
103.
Fasshauer M, Klein J, Kralisch S, Klier M, Lossner U, Bluher M, Paschke R. Serum amyloid A3 expression is stimulated by dexamethasone and interleukin-6 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Endocrinol. 2004;183:561–7.
Figure Legends
A
Fig. 1
Socs3ΔLy6G Mice Exhibit Comparable Brain-targeted EAE to Socs3ΔLysM Mice and Disease Induction Requires Neutrophils. EAE was induced in Socs3fl/fl, Ly6G+/-, Socs3ΔLysM and Socs3ΔLy6G mice. (A) Classical EAE scoring for Socs3fl/fl and Ly6G+/- mice. (B) Brain-targeted EAE scoring for Socs3ΔLysM and Socs3ΔLy6G mice. (C) Classical EAE scoring for Socs3ΔLysM and Socs3ΔLy6G mice. (D) Survival analysis for Socs3ΔLysM and Socs3ΔLy6G mice. (E) Neutrophil-specific depletion was performed in Socs3ΔLy6G mice via neutralizing anti-Ly6G Ab (clone 1A8; 200 µg) and isotype control Ab (rat IgG2a, clone 2A3; 200 µg) administered i.p. on days 0, 3 and 6 post immunization. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
A
Fig. 2
Disease Scores, Cerebellar Myelination, Cerebellar Immune Cell Infiltration and Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines in Ly6G+/- and Socs3ΔLy6G Mice. EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3ΔLy6G mice. (A) Classical EAE scores for Ly6G+/- mice and brain-targeted EAE scores for Socs3ΔLy6G mice, sacrifice day, and percent cerebellar myelination. (B) Representative cerebellar myelin staining at the peak of EAE for Ly6G+/- and Socs3ΔLy6G mice. Arrows indicate demyelinated regions. (C) CB was collected at the peak of EAE to determine immune cell populations and the inflammatory milieu in the CB. Cerebellar total cells were counted. (D) Lymphoid cells (CD45+CD11b-), myeloid cells (CD45hiCD11b+), and microglia (CD45loCD11b+) percentages. (E) Cerebellar homogenates were collected at the peak of EAE and analyzed by Multiplex for cytokine and chemokine expression. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. ns: not significant.
A
Fig. 3
Socs3ΔLy6G Mice Exhibit Increased Cerebellar Neutrophils and NETs. EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3ΔLy6G mice. Mice were sacrificed at the peak of EAE. (A) CB neutrophils were subjected to surface staining. (B) Percent of cerebellar neutrophils (CD45+CD11b+Ly6ClowLy6G+). (C) Total number of cerebellar-infiltrating neutrophils. (D) Cerebellar neutrophils were incubated at 37°C for 30 min with CM-H2DCFDA followed by flow cytometry. (E) RNA was isolated from sorted cerebellar neutrophils and gene expression was analyzed by RT-PCR. (F) EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3ΔLy6G mice. At the peak of cEAE and btEAE, respectively, the CB was fixed with 4% PFA overnight, then soaked with 30% sucrose for 3 days and embedded in OCT. NET formation was determined by staining for citrullinated histone 3 (citH3), and neutrophils were identified by Ly6G staining. Plasma (G) and CB (H) homogenate samples were collected at the peak of EAE. H3.1-nucleosome expression was quantified by ELISA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. ns: not significant. MFI, mean fluorescent intensity.
A
Fig. 4
Socs3ΔLy6G Mice Exhibit a Differential Expansion in Neutrophil Clusters Compared to Ly6G+/- Mice. EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3ΔLy6G mice (n = 3), and then SC and/or CB were collected at the peak of EAE (days 12–14). Live CD45+CD11b+ cells from the SC of Ly6G+/- mice with EAE (n = 3), from the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE (n = 3), and from the combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/- mice (n = 3) and naïve Socs3ΔLy6G mice (n = 4) were subjected to scRNA-Seq. (A) Neutrophil clusters are shown by UMAP. (B) Percentage of the 5 neutrophil clusters shown in the 4 conditions. (C) Dot plot corresponding to neutrophil cluster genes. Dot size represents the percentage of cells in the cluster expressing the gene and dot color represents its average expression within the cluster. (D) Violin plots colored for differential cluster-defining genes. (E) Signaling pathways identified by GSEA pathway analysis in the 5 Neu clusters.
A
Fig. 5
Enhanced EAE-related Gene Expression in Socs3ΔLy6G Mice. EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3ΔLy6G mice (n = 3), and then SC and/or CB were collected at the peak of EAE (days 12–14). Live CD45+CD11b+ cells from the SC of Ly6G+/- mice with EAE (n = 3), from the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE (n = 3), and from the combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/- mice (n = 3) and naïve Socs3ΔLy6G mice (n = 4) were subjected to scRNA-Seq. Neutrophils from the 4 conditions were employed for the following analyses. (A) Dot plot corresponding to the top 20 genes related to the 4 conditions. (B) Violin plots colored for differential genes in the 4 conditions. (C) Dot plot corresponding to genes related to neutrophil surface markers in the 4 conditions. Dot size represents the percentage of cells expressing the gene and dot color represents its average expression within the group.
A
Fig. 6
Elevated Saa3 Expression in CB and SC of Socs3ΔLy6G Mice with EAE Compared to Ly6G+/- Mice with EAE. EAE was induced in Ly6G+/- and Socs3ΔLy6G mice (n = 3), and then SC and/or CB were collected at the peak of EAE (days 12–14). Live CD45+CD11b+ cells from the SC of Ly6G+/- mice with EAE (n = 3), from the SC and CB of Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE (n = 3), and from the combined SC of naïve Ly6G+/- mice (n = 3) and naïve Socs3ΔLy6G mice (n = 4) were subjected to scRNA-Seq. Neutrophils from the 4 conditions were employed for the following analyses. (A) UMAP plot of Saa3 expression in the 4 conditions. RNA was isolated from sorted neutrophils (CD45+CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow) from the CB (B) and SC (C) of Ly6G+/- and Socs3ΔLy6G mice with EAE and Saa3 expression was analyzed by RT-PCR. Saa3 protein expression was quantified by ELISA in tissue homogenates of CB (D) and SC (E) and in plasma (F) from Ly6G+/- and Socs3ΔLy6G naïve mice and those with EAE. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
A
Fig. 7
Enhanced SAA1 Expression and NET Formation in Plasma of MS Patients. (A) SAA1 protein expression was quantified by ELISA in plasma samples collected from MS patients and HC. (B) H3.1-nucleosome expression was quantified by ELISA in plasma samples collected from MS patients and HC. *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001.
A
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants P50NS108675 (to ENB), AG075057 and AG081687 (to HQ), and HL150078 (to RSW) and a Mark Foundation Endeavor Award (to RSW). We thank the UAB Flow Cytometry & Single Cell Core Facility for assistance with the flow cytometry and scRNA-Seq experiments. The Core is supported by the Center for AIDS Research, NIH AI027767, and the O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, NIH CA013148.
A
Funding
Declaration: Y.W., W.J.T., L.Z., Z.Y., W.Y., J.A.B, H.Q., and E.N.B. were supported by NIH grant P50NS108675. L.Z., H.Q., and E.N.B were supported by NIH grant AG075057. S.B.P. and R.S.W were supported by NIH R01HL150078 and Mark Foundation Endeavor Award.
Author Details, Including Country and City Affiliation: Y.W., W.J.T., L.Z., Z.Y., S.B.P., W.Y., J.A.B, H.Q.: 1918 University Blvd, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 35294; W.J.T.: EMD Serono, Inc., Billerica, MA, 01821; Z.Y.: Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, CA 94158; R.S.W: Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; W.Y.: Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, NY 10021; W.R.M: Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; C.R.: Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; E.N.B.: 701 19th Street South, ALGEN, Suite 835, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 35294.
Ethics Declaration
All animal experiments were performed according to all applicable laws and regulations on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes after receiving approval for the animal license (IACUC-09941) from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Wang, Y. et al. Figure 1
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Total words in MS: 5706
Total words in Title: 10
Total words in Abstract: 311
Total Keyword count: 6
Total Images in MS: 8
Total Tables in MS: 0
Total Reference count: 103