Geographic Variation of Malaria Transmission and Burden Among Children Under Five Across Coastal and Inland Counties of Liberia:
Authors and affiliations
Analysis of the 2022 Malaria Indicator Survey
Title
RichardSagacityTugbeh1,2,3✉Phone(+231)886881690/(+91)9150674254Email
VeliahGeetha1
JenniferH.Gladius1
T-conE.B.Shaw4
SamadouTchakondo1
KomiSelassiGayi3
AyaoSangénisAssogba1
YendounameKandjoni1
1SRM School of Public HealthSRM Institute of Science and TechnologyKattankulathur Campus603 203ChengalpattuTamil NaduIndia
2
A
A
Department of Public Health, College of Health SciencesWilliam V. S
3Tubman UniversityEast-Harper, MarylandLiberia
4Department of SociologyUniversity of Liberia
5SRM School of Public HealthSRM Institute of Science and TechnologyKattankulathur Campus603 203Chengalpattu, ChennaiIndia
Richard Sagacity Tugbeh 1,2*, Veliah Geetha1, Gladius Jennifer H.1, T- con E.B. Shaw3, Samadou Tchakondo1, Komi Selassi Gayi, Ayao Sangénis Assogba 1, Yendouname Kandjoni1
1SRM School of Public Health, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur Campus, Chengalpattu − 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India
2Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, William V. S. Tubman University, East-Harper, Maryland, Liberia
3Department of Sociology, University of Liberia.
*Corresponding author: Richard Sagacity Tugbeh; E-mail: rt5716@srmist.edu.in; Tel: (+ 231) 886881690 / (+ 91) 9150674254.
Abstract
Background
Like other countries in the WHO African Region, malaria remains a critical public health threat in Liberia, contributing to a significant proportion of outpatient visits, hospital admissions, and deaths, particularly among vulnerable populations such as children under five and pregnant women. Despite extensive control efforts, malaria continues to cause significant illness and death among young children and pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa, including Liberia. This study aimed to investigate the socioeconomic, demographic and behavioral factors that drive geographic disparities in malaria burden among children under five between coastal and inland counties of Liberia.
Method
This study analyzed secondary data from the 2022 Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey (LMIS) that is nationally representative and included a total weighted sample size of 2,189 children under five (5) years (aged 6–59 months) and their caregivers. Descriptive statistics was done using the guide to DHS Statistics (DHS-8) to calculate the malaria prevalence as a parameter using other factors by counties and regions. A two-proportion Z-test was also done to determine statistically significant difference in malaria prevalence between coastal and inland regions of Liberia. Logistic regression was used to identify the determinants impacting malaria in children under five.
Result
The study revealed malaria prevalence among under-five children was 8.3% in coastal and 12.7% in inland regions. It (Z = 3.33, p = 0.001) showed a significant difference between the two regions. Logistic regression identified key predictors: children not sleeping under ITNs had 1.6 times higher odds of malaria; all anemia levels increased risk, with severe anemia showing the highest odds (AOR = 2.4; 95% CI: 2.25–54.17); children from the poorest households had the greatest risk (AOR = 11.1; 95% CI: 2.69–45.72); infants (0–11 months) had lower odds (AOR = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01–0.16); and urban children were less likely to have malaria than rural ones (AOR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.40–0.88).
Conclusion
A
This study revealed marked spatial heterogeneity in under-five malaria across Liberia, with inland and some coastal counties showing higher prevalence. Malaria risk was linked to anemia, child age, ITN use, household wealth, and rural residence. Targeted interventions should prioritize inland and coastal hotspots, focusing on vulnerable groups and strengthening rural health and vector control efforts.
Keywords:
Malaria prevalence
Children under-five
Liberia
Malaria
Coastal & Inland
region
geographic
A
A
Introduction
A
Malaria remains a major global public health problem. In 2022, there were an estimated 249 million malaria cases and more than 600,000 deaths worldwide, with about half of the global population living in areas at risk of malaria transmission across 91 countries and territories [1]. The burden is disproportionately concentrated in Africa. In 2023, the WHO African Region accounted for 94% of global malaria cases and 95% of malaria deaths, with children under five years old representing about 76% of these deaths [2]. Despite extensive control efforts, malaria continues to cause significant illness and death, particularly among young children and pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa, including Liberia. To address this, the World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted the Global Technical Strategy for Malaria (2016–2030) in 2015, aiming to reduce malaria incidence and mortality by at least 90% by 2030 [3]. However, progress began to slow by 2017, prompting the launch of the High Burden to High Impact (HBHI) initiative in 2018, which prioritized intensified control efforts in countries bearing the greatest malaria burden [4]. Malaria remains highly endemic in Liberia despite global efforts and national, disproportionately affecting pregnant women and children under five years old due to their lower immunity [5]. It accounts for 34% of outpatient visits, 47% of inpatient admissions, and 23% of hospital deaths [6]. To address challenge, The country’s National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) is currently implementing its fourth National Strategic Plan (2021–2025), which seeks to reduce malaria morbidity and mortality by 75% by 2025, in alignment with the WHO’s global strategy [7]. In Liberia, the major vectors causing malaria are the Anopheles gambiae and the Anopheles funestus, whose transmission is persistent throughout the year but high during the rainy season when mosquito breeding is increased [8]. Malaria transmission levels vary between coastal and inland areas because of differences in environmental, socioeconomic, and infrastructural conditions. Coastal region of Liberia including Montserrado, Magibi, Maryland, Cape Mount, Grand Bassa, Grand Kru, River Cess, and Sinoe counties have high humidity, frequent rainfall, and extensive wetlands, providing ideal mosquito breeding sites [9]. In contrast, inland areas such as Lofa, Bong, and Nimba counties have higher elevations, drier seasons, and seasonal climatic variations, which influence malaria transmission intensity [9]. While malaria transmission remains steady in coastal areas, inland regions often experience seasonal fluctuations due to changes in temperature and rainfall. Malaria transmission is significantly affected by climatic variables, particularly temperature, precipitation, and humidity. These factors create suitable conditions for developing malaria vectors and parasites [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Socioeconomic factors such as poverty is a major determinant of malaria risk, affecting access to preventive tools, healthcare services, and treatment adherence [15, 16]. Despite the malaria control strategies in Liberia that prioritizes protecting young children and pregnant women through proven interventions such as ITNs, chemoprevention, vaccination, case management and behavior change, there are still challenges in reaching the needed population [7, 6, 17, 18, 19]. The 2022 Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey (LMIS) reported a Malaria prevalence that ranges from 1% in Greater Monrovia to 19% in South Eastern B. and malaria prevalence of 10% among children aged 6–59 months, indicating ongoing transmission within the population. Additionally, in 2022, Liberia reported 480,614 cases, highlighting the ongoing burden of the disease [6, 20]. However, most studies on Liberia report only national averages, offering little insight into regional differences, particularly between coastal and inland counties [6, 21]. Moreover, previous studies in Liberia and across sub-Saharan Africa shown that inequalities in healthcare access, socioeconomic status, and uptake of preventive measures contribute significantly to variations in malaria burden between regions. However, there is limited research that specifically examines whether these disparities are more pronounced between coastal and inland settings within Liberia [2223, 15, 16]. This study addresses these gaps by comparing these geographical areas and analyzing how socioeconomic, and behavioral factors influence malaria transmission and burden in Liberia. Findings from this research can inform targeted interventions that address region-specific risk factors, ultimately improving malaria prevention and control policies and outcomes in Liberia. Accordingly, this study seeks investigates the socioeconomic, and behavioral factors that drive geographic disparities in malaria burden among children under five between coastal and inland counties of Liberia.
Methods
Setting and Target Population
The study was conducted in Liberia, a country located on the west coast of Africa. It is bordered by the Atlantic Ocean to the southwest, Sierra Leone to the west, Guinea to the south, and Ivory Coast to the east. The country is divided into 15 political sub- division called County, with a population of 5.3 million people [24]. The study considered all the 15 counties in Liberia, including rural and urban settings with a particular focused on children under five years or aged 6–59 months and their caregivers in coastal and inland regions.
The LMIS 2022 data was collected based on the six health regions of Liberia but for the purpose of this study these health regions were divided into two, coastal and inland regions using the fifteen counties of Liberia. These are the operation definitions:
Region is defined as group of counties classified as either coastal or inland.
Coastal region refers to counties that bordered the coast or Atlantic Ocean.
Inland region refers to counties that are not bordered with the coast or Atlantic Ocean.
A
Fig. 1
Map of Liberia showing the counties. This map was produced with QGIS using the Liberia’s counties shapefile obtained from the Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo- Information Services (LISGIS).
Click here to Correct
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
This study included all children who were of the de facto children population, tested for malaria, and value record during LMIS. The study excluded all children who were not part of the de facto population, not tested for malaria and those whose values were not recorded.
Study Design
Based on the aim of the study, a secondary data analysis was done using the Liberia Malaria Indicators Survey 2022 dataset. The LMIS was a nationally representative cross-sectional survey conducted every five years in Liberia. The 2022 LMIS was conducted from October 4, 2022 to December 12, 2022. The 2022 Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey was implemented by the Liberia National Malaria Control Program of the Ministry of Health (MoH) in collaboration with the Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services (LISGIS). The primary objective of the 2022 LMIS was to provide current information for policymakers, planners, researchers, and program managers. The survey also provides population-based prevalence estimates for anaemia and malaria among children aged 6–59 months. Standardized household cluster sampling methods were applied [6]. Accordingly, this study utilised quantitative research methods to provide answers the research questions.
Sampling Techniques and Sample Size
A
The 2022 LMIS followed a two-stage sample design. The first stage involved the selection of sampling points (clusters) consisting of enumeration areas (EAs) delineated for the Liberia’s 2008 National Population and Housing Census (2008 PHC) which served as the Sampling frame. A total of 150 clusters were randomly selected using probability proportional to size. of these clusters, 70 were in urban areas and 80 in rural areas [6]. In the second stage, 30 households per cluster were systematically selected, resulting in a total sample size of 4,500 households. 4500 households were selected for the survey but 40306 were enumerated [6].
A
Finally, a total of 2864 children under five were selected for malaria testing which the study used as sample size. This Study used a weighted sample size of 2,189 children under five (5) years (aged 6–59 months) and their caregivers.
Data Source
This study used Liberia Malaria Indicators Survey 2022 data that was accessed from the official database of the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program [25], the 2022 LMIS was conducted from October 4, 2022 to December 12, 2022.
All women age 15 to 49 who were either regular inhabitants of the selected households or guests who remained in the family the night before the survey were eligible to be interviewed with the parents or guardians consent all children age 659 months were tested for anemia and for malaria infection. The 2022 LMIS employed three questionnaires: the biomarker questionnaire, the women's questionnaire, and the household questionnaire. Questions concerning the 2021 mass insecticide-treated net (ITN) distribution campaign, the acceptability of the new malaria vaccine, and mass drug administration of seasonal malaria chemoprevention for children were among the topics covered in the questionnaires, which were based on the DHS programs model questionnaires and modified to reflect the population and health issues pertinent to Liberia [6].
Study variables and measurements
Outcome variable
Malaria prevalence (malaria status) was the outcome variable used by this study, measured using variable HML32 from the 2022 Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey (LMIS). It is defined the WHO Statistics guidelines as the percentage of children age 6–59 months classified as having malaria according to microscopy test [26]. It included all children who were of the de facto children population, tested for malaria, and value record during LMIS. The variable was binary, coded as 1 for "Positive" and 0 for "Negative".
Explanatory variables
The explanatory variables used in this study were grouped into four categories as socioeconomic, demographic, behavioral, and geographic in view of literature and conceptual framework [16, 15, 10, 11, 27, 28]. Most of the variables used in this study are constructed according to standard DHS definitions [26].
Socioeconomic and Demographic Predictors (Factors)
For the socioeconomic and demographic factors of under-five malaria, this group included available information on household wealth, Caregiver education and child’s age group. Wealth index (Poorest, Poorer, Middle, Richer, Richest) u ranging from low to high levels of household wealth, caregiver education which presented highest level of education attained (no education, primary, secondary, highest). Child’s age group Children age under-five (6–59 month) used in this study was originally children age under-five (6–59 month) which is the focus of the study, was changed from its original form in order to be recoded in seven age groups or categories (6–8, 9–11,12–17,18–23, 24–35, 36–47, 48–59).
Behavioral Factors
Pertaining to behavioral factors, Insecticide-Treated Nets (ITN) usage (HML12), Anemia (HW57), and care-seeking for fever (yes, no) are driving factors for malaria particularly ITN usage. For this study, ITN usage was changed from its original form in order to be recoded in two categories (didn’t sleep under net, slept under ITN nets). Anemia, which is also serious driving factor of malaria was kept in its original order (severe, mild, moderate, not anaemic)
Geographical Factors
Regarding the geographic factors, region (V024), and type place of residence (V025) are also driving factors for malaria under-five. Region was transformed and recorded from its original form to two categories (coastal and inland). In the case of the second
selected factor, type of place of residence, this variable was kept in its original form, which
was as either urban or rural.
Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
Data processing
R and SPSS software were used to calculate both descriptive and inferential statistics. SPSS was used to check data for uniformity and accuracy, while R (version 4.4.1) was used for data processing and cleaning.
A
The study followed a systematic workflow to ensure data quality and reproducibility of results.
The household member recodes (PR) and kids under five recodes (KR) datasets were utilized for this study's LIMS data. As advised by the DHS program, these files were weighted using the household sample weighting variable (HV005) prior to statistical analysis in order to produce statistics that are typical of Liberia.
In order to uniquely identify each child and caregiver across both datasets, the KR and PR files were first combined using common identifiers for cluster number, household number, and kid's line number in household (V001 = hv001, v002 = hv002, B16 = HVIDX). This stage made sure that family member data from the PR file was linked with kid characteristics from the KR file, such as age and malaria status.
The KR dataset contained the majority of the study variables pertaining to the LMIS data; however, for certain variables, like ITN use and malaria status (microscope), the KR dataset was combined with the PR datasets. The household sample weighting variable (HV005) was used to weight the combined data. Prior to analysis, the combined dataset was cleaned and any missing values were addressed using the Guide to DHS Statistics DHS-8. To facilitate understanding and represent significant groupings, the age of the child, a crucial continuous variable was categorized. To produce appropriate variables for the analysis, recoding was done on the cleaned merged dataset.
Data Analysis Procedures
Descriptive statistics was done using the guide to DHS Statistics (DHS-8) to calculate the malaria prevalence by counties and regions as a parameter using other factors. Two- Proportion Z- test and logistic regression were also used for analysis based on the study's objectives. To ascertain whether the prevalence of malaria in Liberia's inland and coastal regions differs statistically significantly, a two-proportion Z-test was also used.
Prior to the two-proportion Z-test, the weighted prevalence of malaria was calculated by region (inland and coastal). The Guide to DHS Statistics DHS-8 was used to calculate the malaria prevalence as a parameter using other factors. To calculate malaria prevalence, the PR file was used, the numerator contained the number of de facto children tested using microscopy who are positive for malaria and was represented by these variables (Household selected for hemoglobin (hv042) = 1, Slept last night (hv103) = 1, Child's age in months (hc1) in 6:59, and Result of malaria rapid test (hml32) = 1), and the denominator contained the number of de facto children tested using microscopy who are positive for malaria and was represented by these variables (Household selected for hemoglobin (hv042) = 1, Slept last night (hv103) = 1, Child's age in months (hc1) in 6:59, and Result of malaria rapid test (hml32) in 0,1). The malaria prevalence was calculated as numerator divided by the denominator, multiplied by 100.
Lastly, a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of malaria in children under five between Liberia's coastal and inland regions was assessed using the two-proportion Z-test.\Prior to logistic regression analysis, a weighted sample size of 2,189 observations was obtained by merging the LMIS Kids (KP) and Family Member (PR) datasets. To identify the determinants impacting malaria in children under five in coastal and inland counties, logistics regression was used.
Finally, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used for logistic regression model to determine the model’s discriminative ability, and at a 95% CI, p < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant associated factor for malaria.
Results
Characteristics of the study population
This study used a total of 2,864 children tested for malaria during the LMIS 2022. Based on eligibility criteria, 2192 children were selected which finally resulted in a weighted sample of 2189. Children under- five years (6–59 months) and their caregivers was the population.
Malaria Prevalence
Nationally, children age 6–59 months classified as having malaria according to microscopy test was reported as 10.2% (95% CI: 7.6–12.8) who were of the de facto children population, tested for malaria. There is a spatial heterogeneity in malaria prevalence at county and regional levels.
A
Base on the result recorded in Table1, Sinoe county (22.6%) has the highest prevalence and follows by Grand Kru (21.1%), while Montserrado county (0.9%) which contains the country’s capital has the lowest prevalence and follows by Grand Gedeh county (3.1%).
A
Table 1
Distribution of malaria prevalence in children under 5 years old in across counties
County
Malaria prevalence (%)
Unweighted Frequency
Weighted Frequency
Bomi
12.4
137
93
Bong
16.7
179
297
Gbarpolu
14.2
168
68
Grand Bassa
18.2
210
220
Grand Cape Mount
8.6
150
91
Grand Gedeh
1.3
148
72
Grand Kru
17.1
168
60
Lofa
15.6
149
232
Margibi
7.3
185
196
Maryland
20.1
216
78
Montserrado
0.9
398
715
Nimba
10.2
281
502
River Gee
17.4
134
36
Rivercess
13.8
151
53
Sinoe
Total
22.6
173
2847
82
2795
A
Fig. 2
Spatial variation of malaria prevalence in children under 5 years old in Liberia. This map was produced with QGIS using the Liberia’s counties shapefile obtained from the Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo- Information Services (LISGIS)
Click here to Correct
As shown in Table 2, the two-proportion z-test for a formal test of proportion difference showed z-value (3.33) and a p-value < 0.05, indicating there is a statistically significant difference in under-five malaria prevalence between Coastal (8.3%) and Inland (12.7%) regions of Liberia. Moreover, this Specifically suggest that children in coastal region have a significantly lower malaria prevalence than inland region.
Table 2
Comparison of Malaria Prevalence Between Coastal and Inland Counties
Region
Weighted_n (Children Tested)
Malaria Positive (%)
Z-value
p-value
Coastal
1,587
08.3
  
Inland
1207
12.7
  
Total
2,794
3.33
0.001
Determinants of Malaria from Logistic regression, model fit and ROC curve
The logistic regression results presented in Table 3 and Fig. 3 show that the model had good explanatory and predictive power. The Nagelkerke R² value of 0.25 indicates that the model accounted for 25% of the total variability in malaria prevalence. Additionally, the model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy with an AUC of 78%.
Five variables were found to be significantly associated with malaria prevalence (p < 0.05): ITN use, anemia status, wealth index, child’s age, and place of residence.
Children who did not sleep under any mosquito net had significantly higher odds of malaria compared to those who used treated ITNs (AOR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.07–2.00). All levels of anemia were significant predictors of malaria, with severely anemic children having much higher odds of infection compared to non-anemic peers (AOR = 2.4; 95% CI: 2.25–54.17).
Regarding socioeconomic status, children from poorer households had a much greater likelihood of contracting malaria than those from the wealthiest households, with the effect being strongest among the poorest (AOR = 11.1; 95% CI: 2.69–45.72).
Age was also a significant factor: younger children under five had considerably lower odds of malaria infection compared to the oldest subgroup (48–59 months), with infants showing the greatest protection (AOR = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01–0.16). Finally, residence type was influential, children living in urban settings had significantly lower odds of malaria compared to those residing in rural areas (AOR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.40–0.88).
Table 3
Results of logistic regression analysis to explore independent factors (behavior, socioeconomic, demographic) associated with malaria.
Variable/Predictors
N = 2189, N%
B
P-value
Adjusted OR (Exp(B))
95% confidence Interval of OR
ITN Use
Didn’t sleep under net
1064(48.6)
0.38
0.016
0.46*
1.07,1.99
Slept under ITN nets
1125(51.6)
Ref
   
Anaemia status
Severe
12 (0.6)
2.40
0.003
11.05*
2.25,54.17
Mild
537 (24.5)
1.51
0.000
4.55*
3.08,6.72
Moderate
675 (30.9)
0.43
0.035
1.53*
1.03,2.28
Not anaemic
966 (44.1)
Ref
   
Caregiver Education level
No Education
803 (36.7)
1.43
0.367
4.19
0.19,94.72
Primary
622 (28.4)
1.69
0.288
5.41
0.24,122.24
Secondary
686 (31.3)
0.64
0.688
1.89
0.08,43.21
Highest
77 (3.5)
Ref
   
Wealth Index
Poorest
590 (27.0)
2.41
0.001
11.09*
2.69,45.72
Poorer
485 (22.2)
2.13
0.003
8.41*
2.04,34.69
Middle
445 (20.4)
1.98
0.006
7.27*
1.79,29.63
Richer
406 (18.5)
0.57
0.469
1.76
0.38,8.11
Richest
261 (11.9)
Ref
   
Child age group in month
6–8
163 (7.5)
-3.22
0.000
0.04*
0.01,0.16
9–11
116 (5.3)
-1.71
0.000
0.18*
0.72,0.46
12–17
291 (13.3)
-2.07
0.000
0.13*
0.06,0.25
18–23
246 (11.6)
-1.10
0.000
0.33*
0.19,0.57
24–35
436 (19.9)
-0.79
0.000
0.45*
0.29. 0.69
36–47
444 (20.3)
-0.39
0.063
0.66
0.45,1.02
48–59
492 (22.9)
Ref
   
Care seeking/Sought care for fever
No
1311(59.9)
0.11
0.526
1.11
0.80,1.54
Yes
878 (40.1)
Ref
   
Place of residence
Urban
1069(48.8)
-0.52
0.001
0.60*
0.40,0.88
Rural
1120(51.2)
Ref
   
Region
Coastal
1232(56.3)
0.002
0.992
1.00
0.72,1.39
Inland
957 (43.7)
Ref
   
Notes : * denotes signifiance p-value
Fig. 3
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for Logistic Regression Model, illustrating the model’s discriminative ability. The AUC was 77.7% which showed a good discrimination close to 0.8.
Click here to Correct
Discussion
Malaria continues to pose a major public health problem across Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including Liberia [2]. This study contributes to an in-depth understanding of malaria prevalence and associated factors (socioeconomic, demographic, and behavioral) that drive geographic disparities in malaria burden among children under five between coastal and inland counties of Liberia.
Nationally, the malarias prevalence for children age 6–59 months classified as having malaria according to microscopy and who were of the de facto children population was reported as 10.2%. This indicates progress in the malaria control efforts by the NMCP in supporting Liberia’s goal of a 75% reduction in malaria burden by 2025, while contributing to the global 2030 targets [7, 3]. Though the overall malaria prevalence is low but malaria remains a major burden in Liberia [2].
The findings from this study indicate that malaria distribution is spatially uneven, and the national average conceals notable county-level hotspots. Both coastal and inland regions showed significant hotspot counties (Sinoe, Maryland, Grand Bassa, River Gee, Grand Kru, Lofa, and Bong). Spatial heterogeneity remains a defining feature of malaria risk in Sub-Sahara Africa, as national and subnational surveys repeatedly demonstrate that some localities, often rural or ecologically favorable zones experience much higher malaria prevalence than others.
In this research, the observed pattern of higher malaria prevalence in inland (12.3%) compared to coastal (8.7%) regions confirms this variability. It specifically indicates that children living in coastal counties are considerably less affected by malaria than those in inland areas. This pattern aligns with observations made in several studies, even though not all research explicitly distinguishes coastal and inland zones [22, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31].
Liberia’s climate is predominantly equatorial, featuring three main topographic zones. The first is a low-lying coastal belt, roughly 40 kilometers wide, made up of tidal creeks, shallow lagoons, and mangrove swamps. Inland lies the second belt of undulating hills rising to between 60 and 150 meters (200–500 feet). The third, and largest, belt comprises a series of low mountains and plateaus, marked by abrupt elevation changes and relatively sparse forest cover [32].
Differences in malaria transmission between Liberia’s coastal and inland areas arise from variations in environmental, socioeconomic, and infrastructural factors. The coastal counties like Montserrado, Margibi, Maryland, Grand Cape Mount, Grand Bassa, Grand Kru, River Cess, and Sinoe experience high humidity, frequent rainfall, and widespread wetlands, all of which provide ideal breeding habitats for mosquitoes [9]. In contrast, inland regions such as Lofa, Bong, and Nimba have higher altitudes, longer dry periods, and more pronounced seasonal climate variations, resulting in differences in transmission intensity [9]. While malaria transmission in coastal regions tends to persist throughout the year, inland areas often experience more seasonal fluctuations influenced by rainfall and temperature.
The finding that certain counties remain malaria hotspots indicates a significant threat to malaria control progress in Liberia and highlights the urgent need for targeted intervention measures [21].
Logistic regression results revealed that children from poorer households were more likely to be infected with malaria than those from wealthier families, with the highest risk observed among the poorest households. This outcome is consistent with research conducted in Liberia, Tanzania, Nigeria, and Kenya [21, 22, 28, 29, 31], emphasizing the critical influence of socioeconomic inequality on malaria burden. Families with limited financial means typically face reduced access to health services [16] and preventive measures [15].
Child age also played a notable role in malaria risk. Younger infants aged six to eight months often retain partial maternal immunity, while older under-five children tend to experience higher infection rates. Evidence from Liberia, Tanzania, Nigeria, and Uganda [21, 28, 29, 30] shows a similar trend, where older children (48–59 months) face a greater risk of malaria infection. This pattern likely reflects the protection younger infants receive from maternal antibodies transferred during pregnancy and breastfeeding [28].
Anaemia status was another strong determinant, showing a statistically significant link with malaria prevalence among under-five children. Findings from Nigeria and Tanzania support this relationship [28, 29]. Anaemic children were found to be more prone to malaria infection compared with non-anaemic peers, underscoring the interdependence between both conditions. Preventing malaria, therefore, also contributes to reducing anaemia rates among young children since the two conditions share common underlying causes.
Similarly, the analysis revealed that children residing in urban areas had lower malaria prevalence compared to their rural counterparts, a finding that agrees with previous research [28, 29]. This disparity is likely related to factors such as greater mosquito exposure near breeding sites, poor housing, limited economic resources, and inadequate access to healthcare or preventive tools in rural communities [15, 16].
The logistic regression analysis also showed that ITN use and care-seeking for fever were negatively associated with malaria prevalence among under-five children in Liberia. This is consistent with extensive evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa, which confirms the protective effect of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and timely medical care against malaria morbidity and mortality [2, 33, 34]. Children who did not sleep under any mosquito net had considerably higher odds of malaria infection compared with those who slept under treated ITNs, echoing findings from earlier studies. ITNs serve both as a physical shield and a chemical deterrent, reducing mosquito-human interaction and thereby lowering transmission [2]. Studies have also reaffirmed ITN use as a key protective factor, whereas non-use increases risk [29, 31]. However, their effectiveness depends on the net’s condition, consistent nightly use, and correct installation. A properly maintained ITN can reduce malaria episodes among under-five children by as much as 50% [2].
Care-seeking for fever also exhibited a negative association with malaria prevalence, suggesting that children whose caregivers sought early medical attention were more likely to receive testing and prompt treatment, preventing severe disease and continued transmission. Delays in seeking treatment contribute to ongoing infections and sustained transmission [16]. Research in Liberia, Nigeria, and Kenya also demonstrates that timely fever care, along with access to rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), substantially reduces malaria cases [29, 31]. These findings emphasize the need to strengthen healthcare availability, community awareness, and affordability of care, especially in rural and resource-limited areas.
Limitations
Although this study successfully identified predictors influencing malaria among children under five across coastal and inland counties of Liberia, it faced several limitations. These included data-related challenges such as dependence on secondary data sources, data quality and missingness, measurement errors, and recall bias, as well as limitations related to generalizability.
One of the main constraints was the reliance on secondary datasets. The study made use of pre-existing data from the Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey (LMIS) and climate/environmental databases, which restricted the range of variables available for analysis. The LMIS questionnaire might not include all the detailed behavioral, or socioeconomic indicators relevant to malaria transmission, and certain questions may not have been framed to suit the current research focus [35]. Moreover, the accuracy of the measurements for all exposures cannot be independently verified, and some important confounding variables might not have been captured.
Data quality and missing information also posed challenges. Like most household surveys, non-response and incomplete data were present. For instance, this analysis excluded children who were “not tested for malaria” or had missing records, which could introduce selection bias. Declining participation and item non-response rates in such surveys may further reduce the representativeness of the sample. In the logistic regression analysis, cases with system-missing data were excluded based on malaria status, which reduced the weighted sample size from 2,864 to 2,189.
Finally, regarding generalizability and external validity, the findings are specific to children aged 6–59 months in Liberia and may not apply to other populations or countries. Differences in malaria transmission patterns, health infrastructure, and socioeconomic contexts vary widely across regions. Therefore, what holds true for Liberia in 2022 may not necessarily apply to neighboring nations. Even within Liberia, the LMIS covered only the period from October to December 2022, so the results might not represent other seasons or years. Malaria prevalence may rise during the rainy season and decline during the dry season.
Conclusion
This study revealed that malaria among children under five is heterogenous across Liberia. Significant hotspot counties were identified in both coastal and inland regions, including Sinoe, Maryland, Grand Bassa, River Gee, Grand Kru, Lofa, and Bong. The main determinants of malaria prevalence among under-five children were ITN usage, household wealth index, and care-seeking behavior for fever, all of which showed significant influence.
This study, through the two-proportion Z-test confirmed that inland counties had significantly higher under-five malaria prevalence compared to coastal counties, indicating substantial geographical disparities. The logistic regression analysis further linked malaria infection to anemia status, child age, ITN use, household wealth, and rural residence.
Based on the study’s findings, Liberia’s malaria profile showed intense spatial heterogeneity, some coastal and inland counties such as Sinoe, Maryland, Grand Bassa, River Gee, Grand Kru, Lofa, and Bong have much higher under‑five prevalence.
To reduce malaria among children and achieve the global 2030 targets of elimination, policy must shift from uniform national approaches to targeted subnational responses, and interventions must be targeted to these hotspots based on the key risk factors identified. This underscores the need for prioritizing protecting young children and pregnant women through proven interventions like ITNs, chemoprevention, vaccination, case management and behavior change in line with WHO guidance.
List of Abbreviations
ACT
Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy
ANC
Antenatal Care
AOR
Adjusted Odds Ratio, AUC:Area Under Curve
CHA
Community Health Assistant
GTS
Global Technical Strategy
IPTp
Intermittent Preventive Treatment for malaria in Pregnancy
ITN
Insecticide Treated-Bed Nets
LMIS
Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey
LLIN
Long-Lasting Insecticides Nets
NMCP
National Malaria Control Program
RTS.S
Repeated T-cell epitopes Surface antigens
SP
Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine
SMC
Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention
USAID
United States Agency for International Development
WHO
World Health Organization
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study analyzed factors driving the transmission and burden of malaria in children under five. The data used in this study are publicly available data from the DHS portal and the authorization to use the dataset was granted by the DHS. Consistent with the standards in ensuring the protection of respondents’ privacy, the collected data used in the present study was anonymous and acquired participants informed consent [36]. So, there was no additional ethical permission required.
Consent to publication
Not applicable.
A
Data Availability
The datasets that support the conclusions of this study are accessible through the Measure DHS repository. The 2022 Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey (LMIS) dataset in particular, can be obtained from [https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm](https:/dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm) following request and approval from the DHS Program.
Competing interests
The authors affirm that the study was conducted without any financial assistance or commercialization that could impede the study as a potential conflict of interest.
A
Funding
No funding received for this study.
A
Author Contribution
Richard Tugbeh conceptualized and designed the study, conducted the data analysis and up to the preparation of the initial manuscript draft. Veliah Geetha provided supervision for the study, offered methodological guidance, and critically reviewed the manuscript for significance. Gladius Jennifer H. contributed to the analytical approach and provided technical and statistical guidance during data analysis. T-con Shaw provided technical support during the data analysis and as well as manuscript editing. Samadou Tchakondo, Komi Selassi Gayi, Ayao Sangénis Assogba, and Yendouname Kandjoni participated in literature review, data interpretation and as well as manuscript editing. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
A
Acknowledgement
The authors wholeheartedly extend their sincere appreciation to Dr. Muthuperumal Prakash and Dr. Harr Singh of the SRM School of Public Health for their immeasurable guidance and support throughout this work. Our appreciation also goes to the DHS Program for providing access to the Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey (TMIS) 2022 data which made this study possible.
Authors’ information
1SRM School of Public Health, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur Campus, Chengalpattu − 603 203, Chennai, India.
2Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, William V. S. Tubman University, East-Harper, Maryland, Liberia
3Department of Sociology, University of Liberia.
References
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Malaria’s impact worldwide [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CDC; 2024 Apr 1 [cited 2025 Oct 19]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/php/impact/index.html
2.
World Health Organization. World malaria report 2023. 2023. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/5a85508d-27c0-4fab-97d0-08e0ab468ad8/content
3.
World Health Organization. Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030: 2021 update. 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240031357
4.
World Health Organization. High burden to high impact: A targeted malaria response. 2018. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-CDS-GMP-2018.25
5.
Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526(7572):207–11.
6.
National Malaria Control Program (NMCP). Liberia. Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey (LMIS) 2022: Final report. 2023. https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/MIS44/MIS44.pdf
7.
National Malaria Control Program (NMCP). Liberia. Liberia National Malaria Strategic Plan 2021–2025. Liberia: Ministry of Health; 2022.
8.
Koffi AA, Camara S, Ahoua Alou LP, et al. Anopheles vector distribution and malaria transmission dynamics in Gbêké region, central Côte d’Ivoire. Malar J. 2023;22:192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04623-1.
9.
Nyasa R, Awatboh F, Kwenti TE, Titanji VPK, Ndip, Ayamba LM. The effect of climatic factors on the number of malaria cases in an inland and a coastal setting from 2011 to 206 in the equatorial rain forest of Cameroon. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22:461. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07445-9.
10.
Traoré N, Millogo O, Sié A, Vounatsou P. Impact of climate variability and interventions on malaria incidence and forecasting in Burkina Faso. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024;21:1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21111487.
11.
Bationo CS, Lokossou V, Landier J, Sylla B, Tougri G, Ouedraogo B et al. Geo-epidemiology of malaria in Burkina Faso, 2013–2018: A recent re-increase. 2021. Preprint. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.27.21265260v1.full
12.
Thomson MC, Ukawuba I, Hershey CL, Bennett A, Ceccato P, Lyon B, Dinku T. (206). Using rainfall and temperature data in the evaluation of national malaria control programs in Africa. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 206; 97(Suppl. S3), 32–45.
13.
Abiodun GJ, Maharaj R, Witbooi P, Okosun KO. Modelling the influence of temperature and rainfall on the population dynamics of Anopheles arabiensis. Malar J. 2016;15(1):364. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1411-6.
14.
Okiring A et al. (2021). Relationships between test positivity rate, total laboratory confirmed cases of malaria, and malaria incidence in high burden settings of Uganda: An ecological analysis. Malaria Journal, 2021; 20, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03584-7
15.
Abraham D, Fennie K, Degarege D, Chennupati S, Madhivanan P. Improving socioeconomic status may reduce the burden of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211205.
16.
Yue G, Liang D, Cao J, Gosling R, Mushi V, Huang J. How socioeconomic status affected access to health facilities and malaria diagnosis in children under five years: Findings from 19 sub-Saharan African countries. Infect Dis Poverty. 2023;12:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-023-01075-2.
17.
WHO Liberia. WHO Liberia annual report: Protecting the health of vulnerable populations in Liberia. 2024.
18.
White E, Mendin S, Kolubah FR, Karlay R, Grant B, Jacobs GP, et al. Impact of the Liberian National Community Health Assistant Program on childhood illness care in Grand Bassa County, Liberia. PLoS Glob Public Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000668.
19.
Global Health Supply Chain Program. Increasing Access to Mosquito Nets through Schools to Fight Malaria in Liberia. 2024. Available from: https://www.ghsupplychain.org/resources
20.
World Bank. Malaria prevalence and health outcomes in Liberia, World Bank Group. 2024. https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2021-07/15917-WB_Liberia%20Country%20Profile-WEB.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
21.
Koko J, Kollie KK, Ballah K. Episodes of confirmed malaria and associated factors among patients attending selected health facilities, Liberia, 2015–2016. J Intervent Epidemiol Public Health. 2021;4(1):10. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2021.4.1.32679.
22.
Bawo L, Platt EJ, Korlubah SD. Assessment of long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN) ownership and utilization in households with children under five years in Grand Bassa County, Liberia. Public Health Action. 2012;2(3):93–7. https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.12.0013.
23.
Awantang GN, Fiawoo G, Henshaw DL, Ricotta EE. The Healthy Baby, Happy Mother campaign and its influence on prompt malaria treatment among caregivers of children under five in Liberia. Malar J. 2018;6:425. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2601-8.
24.
Liberia Institute of Statistics & Geo-Information Services (LISGIS). 2022 Liberia National Population and Housing Census (NPHC): Thematic report on population size, distribution and structure. Monrovia: LISGIS; 2023. https://lisgis.gov.lr/censusreport
25.
Liberia Institute of Statistics & Geo-Information Services (LISGIS). Ministry of Health (MoH), National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), ICF. Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey 2022 (LMIS) [dataset]. Monrovia, Liberia & Rockville (MD), USA: LISGIS, MoH, NMCP & ICF; 2023 [cited 2025 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/dataset/Liberia_MIS_2022.cfm
26.
DHS Program. Guide to DHS Statistics (DHS-8). StatCompiler. 2023. https://www.dhsprogram.com/Data/Guide-to-DHS-Statistics/index.cfm
27.
Kombate G, Kone I, Douti B, Soubeiga KAM, Grobbee DE, van der Sande MAB. Malaria risk mapping among children under five in Togo. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):8213.
28.
Animut Y, Nigatu SG, Teklu RE, Abiy SA, et al. Spatial distribution of malaria among under-five children and associated factors in Tanzania: a spatial and multilevel analysis. Malar J. 2025;24:86. 10.1186/s12936-025-05313-w.
29.
Ugwu CLJ, Zewotir T. Spatial distribution and sociodemographic risk factors of malaria in Nigerian children less than 5 years old. Geospat Health. 2020;15(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2020.819.
30.
Nzabakiriraho JD, Gayawan E. Geostatistical modeling of malaria prevalence among under-five children in Rwanda. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:369. 10.1186/s12889-021-10305-x.
31.
Ayele DG, Mohammed MOM, Abdallah ASR, Wacho GA. Assessment of malaria transmission in Kenya using multilevel logistic regression. Heliyon. 2024;10(21):e39835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39835.
32.
World Bank Group. Climate Risk Country Profile: Liberia. 2021. Available from: https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2021-07/1596-WB_Liberia%20Country%20Profile-WEB.pdf
33.
World Bank. Malaria prevalence and health outcomes in Liberia. World Bank Group 2024. https://www.worldbank.org/
34.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Treatment for malaria: Guidelines for clinicians 2019. http://www.cdc.gov/malaria/diagnosis_treatment.html
35.
Pederson LL, Koval JJ, Vingilis E. Analysis of secondary data: Considerations revisited. J Public Health Epidemiol. 2022;29. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-3484.000054.
36.
DHS Program/ICF. Protecting the privacy of DHS survey respondents. Rockville (MD): ICF. 2019. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/methodology/Protecting-the-Privacy-of-DHS-Survey-Respondents.cfm
Total words in MS: 5296
Total words in Title: 18
Total words in Abstract: 350
Total Keyword count: 7
Total Images in MS: 3
Total Tables in MS: 3
Total Reference count: 36