Introduction
A
Malaria remains a major global public health problem. In 2022, there were an estimated 249 million malaria cases and more than 600,000 deaths worldwide, with about half of the global population living in areas at risk of malaria transmission across 91 countries and territories [
1]. The burden is disproportionately concentrated in Africa. In 2023, the WHO African Region accounted for 94% of global malaria cases and 95% of malaria deaths, with children under five years old representing about 76% of these deaths [
2]. Despite extensive control efforts, malaria continues to cause significant illness and death, particularly among young children and pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa, including Liberia. To address this, the World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted the Global Technical Strategy for Malaria (2016–2030) in 2015, aiming to reduce malaria incidence and mortality by at least 90% by 2030 [
3]. However, progress began to slow by 2017, prompting the launch of the High Burden to High Impact (HBHI) initiative in 2018, which prioritized intensified control efforts in countries bearing the greatest malaria burden [
4]. Malaria remains highly endemic in Liberia despite global efforts and national, disproportionately affecting pregnant women and children under five years old due to their lower immunity [
5]. It accounts for 34% of outpatient visits, 47% of inpatient admissions, and 23% of hospital deaths [
6]. To address challenge, The country’s National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) is currently implementing its fourth National Strategic Plan (2021–2025), which seeks to reduce malaria morbidity and mortality by 75% by 2025, in alignment with the WHO’s global strategy [
7]. In Liberia, the major vectors causing malaria are the Anopheles gambiae and the Anopheles funestus, whose transmission is persistent throughout the year but high during the rainy season when mosquito breeding is increased [
8]. Malaria transmission levels vary between coastal and inland areas because of differences in environmental, socioeconomic, and infrastructural conditions. Coastal region of Liberia including Montserrado, Magibi, Maryland, Cape Mount, Grand Bassa, Grand Kru, River Cess, and Sinoe counties have high humidity, frequent rainfall, and extensive wetlands, providing ideal mosquito breeding sites [
9]. In contrast, inland areas such as Lofa, Bong, and Nimba counties have higher elevations, drier seasons, and seasonal climatic variations, which influence malaria transmission intensity [
9]. While malaria transmission remains steady in coastal areas, inland regions often experience seasonal fluctuations due to changes in temperature and rainfall. Malaria transmission is significantly affected by climatic variables, particularly temperature, precipitation, and humidity. These factors create suitable conditions for developing malaria vectors and parasites [
10,
11,
12,
13,
14]. Socioeconomic factors such as poverty is a major determinant of malaria risk, affecting access to preventive tools, healthcare services, and treatment adherence [
15,
16]. Despite the malaria control strategies in Liberia that prioritizes protecting young children and pregnant women through proven interventions such as ITNs, chemoprevention, vaccination, case management and behavior change, there are still challenges in reaching the needed population [
7,
6,
17,
18,
19]. The 2022 Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey (LMIS) reported a Malaria prevalence that ranges from 1% in Greater Monrovia to 19% in South Eastern B. and malaria prevalence of 10% among children aged 6–59 months, indicating ongoing transmission within the population. Additionally, in 2022, Liberia reported 480,614 cases, highlighting the ongoing burden of the disease [
6,
20]. However, most studies on Liberia report only national averages, offering little insight into regional differences, particularly between coastal and inland counties [
6,
21]. Moreover, previous studies in Liberia and across sub-Saharan Africa shown that inequalities in healthcare access, socioeconomic status, and uptake of preventive measures contribute significantly to variations in malaria burden between regions. However, there is limited research that specifically examines whether these disparities are more pronounced between coastal and inland settings within Liberia [
22–
23,
15,
16]. This study addresses these gaps by comparing these geographical areas and analyzing how socioeconomic, and behavioral factors influence malaria transmission and burden in Liberia. Findings from this research can inform targeted interventions that address region-specific risk factors, ultimately improving malaria prevention and control policies and outcomes in Liberia. Accordingly, this study seeks investigates the socioeconomic, and behavioral factors that drive geographic disparities in malaria burden among children under five between coastal and inland counties of Liberia.
Explanatory variables
The explanatory variables used in this study were grouped into four categories as socioeconomic, demographic, behavioral, and geographic in view of literature and conceptual framework [16, 15, 10, 11, 27, 28]. Most of the variables used in this study are constructed according to standard DHS definitions [26].
selected factor, type of place of residence, this variable was kept in its original form, which
was as either urban or rural.
Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
Data processing
R and SPSS software were used to calculate both descriptive and inferential statistics. SPSS was used to check data for uniformity and accuracy, while R (version 4.4.1) was used for data processing and cleaning.
A
The study followed a systematic workflow to ensure data quality and reproducibility of results.
The household member recodes (PR) and kids under five recodes (KR) datasets were utilized for this study's LIMS data. As advised by the DHS program, these files were weighted using the household sample weighting variable (HV005) prior to statistical analysis in order to produce statistics that are typical of Liberia.
In order to uniquely identify each child and caregiver across both datasets, the KR and PR files were first combined using common identifiers for cluster number, household number, and kid's line number in household (V001 = hv001, v002 = hv002, B16 = HVIDX). This stage made sure that family member data from the PR file was linked with kid characteristics from the KR file, such as age and malaria status.
The KR dataset contained the majority of the study variables pertaining to the LMIS data; however, for certain variables, like ITN use and malaria status (microscope), the KR dataset was combined with the PR datasets. The household sample weighting variable (HV005) was used to weight the combined data. Prior to analysis, the combined dataset was cleaned and any missing values were addressed using the Guide to DHS Statistics DHS-8. To facilitate understanding and represent significant groupings, the age of the child, a crucial continuous variable was categorized. To produce appropriate variables for the analysis, recoding was done on the cleaned merged dataset.
Data Analysis Procedures
Descriptive statistics was done using the guide to DHS Statistics (DHS-8) to calculate the malaria prevalence by counties and regions as a parameter using other factors. Two- Proportion Z- test and logistic regression were also used for analysis based on the study's objectives. To ascertain whether the prevalence of malaria in Liberia's inland and coastal regions differs statistically significantly, a two-proportion Z-test was also used.
Prior to the two-proportion Z-test, the weighted prevalence of malaria was calculated by region (inland and coastal). The Guide to DHS Statistics DHS-8 was used to calculate the malaria prevalence as a parameter using other factors. To calculate malaria prevalence, the PR file was used, the numerator contained the number of de facto children tested using microscopy who are positive for malaria and was represented by these variables (Household selected for hemoglobin (hv042) = 1, Slept last night (hv103) = 1, Child's age in months (hc1) in 6:59, and Result of malaria rapid test (hml32) = 1), and the denominator contained the number of de facto children tested using microscopy who are positive for malaria and was represented by these variables (Household selected for hemoglobin (hv042) = 1, Slept last night (hv103) = 1, Child's age in months (hc1) in 6:59, and Result of malaria rapid test (hml32) in 0,1). The malaria prevalence was calculated as numerator divided by the denominator, multiplied by 100.
Lastly, a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of malaria in children under five between Liberia's coastal and inland regions was assessed using the two-proportion Z-test.\Prior to logistic regression analysis, a weighted sample size of 2,189 observations was obtained by merging the LMIS Kids (KP) and Family Member (PR) datasets. To identify the determinants impacting malaria in children under five in coastal and inland counties, logistics regression was used.
Finally, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used for logistic regression model to determine the model’s discriminative ability, and at a 95% CI, p < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant associated factor for malaria.
Discussion
Malaria continues to pose a major public health problem across Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including Liberia [2]. This study contributes to an in-depth understanding of malaria prevalence and associated factors (socioeconomic, demographic, and behavioral) that drive geographic disparities in malaria burden among children under five between coastal and inland counties of Liberia.
Nationally, the malarias prevalence for children age 6–59 months classified as having malaria according to microscopy and who were of the de facto children population was reported as 10.2%. This indicates progress in the malaria control efforts by the NMCP in supporting Liberia’s goal of a 75% reduction in malaria burden by 2025, while contributing to the global 2030 targets [7, 3]. Though the overall malaria prevalence is low but malaria remains a major burden in Liberia [2].
The findings from this study indicate that malaria distribution is spatially uneven, and the national average conceals notable county-level hotspots. Both coastal and inland regions showed significant hotspot counties (Sinoe, Maryland, Grand Bassa, River Gee, Grand Kru, Lofa, and Bong). Spatial heterogeneity remains a defining feature of malaria risk in Sub-Sahara Africa, as national and subnational surveys repeatedly demonstrate that some localities, often rural or ecologically favorable zones experience much higher malaria prevalence than others.
In this research, the observed pattern of higher malaria prevalence in inland (12.3%) compared to coastal (8.7%) regions confirms this variability. It specifically indicates that children living in coastal counties are considerably less affected by malaria than those in inland areas. This pattern aligns with observations made in several studies, even though not all research explicitly distinguishes coastal and inland zones [22, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31].
Liberia’s climate is predominantly equatorial, featuring three main topographic zones. The first is a low-lying coastal belt, roughly 40 kilometers wide, made up of tidal creeks, shallow lagoons, and mangrove swamps. Inland lies the second belt of undulating hills rising to between 60 and 150 meters (200–500 feet). The third, and largest, belt comprises a series of low mountains and plateaus, marked by abrupt elevation changes and relatively sparse forest cover [32].
Differences in malaria transmission between Liberia’s coastal and inland areas arise from variations in environmental, socioeconomic, and infrastructural factors. The coastal counties like Montserrado, Margibi, Maryland, Grand Cape Mount, Grand Bassa, Grand Kru, River Cess, and Sinoe experience high humidity, frequent rainfall, and widespread wetlands, all of which provide ideal breeding habitats for mosquitoes [9]. In contrast, inland regions such as Lofa, Bong, and Nimba have higher altitudes, longer dry periods, and more pronounced seasonal climate variations, resulting in differences in transmission intensity [9]. While malaria transmission in coastal regions tends to persist throughout the year, inland areas often experience more seasonal fluctuations influenced by rainfall and temperature.
The finding that certain counties remain malaria hotspots indicates a significant threat to malaria control progress in Liberia and highlights the urgent need for targeted intervention measures [21].
Logistic regression results revealed that children from poorer households were more likely to be infected with malaria than those from wealthier families, with the highest risk observed among the poorest households. This outcome is consistent with research conducted in Liberia, Tanzania, Nigeria, and Kenya [21, 22, 28, 29, 31], emphasizing the critical influence of socioeconomic inequality on malaria burden. Families with limited financial means typically face reduced access to health services [16] and preventive measures [15].
Child age also played a notable role in malaria risk. Younger infants aged six to eight months often retain partial maternal immunity, while older under-five children tend to experience higher infection rates. Evidence from Liberia, Tanzania, Nigeria, and Uganda [21, 28, 29, 30] shows a similar trend, where older children (48–59 months) face a greater risk of malaria infection. This pattern likely reflects the protection younger infants receive from maternal antibodies transferred during pregnancy and breastfeeding [28].
Anaemia status was another strong determinant, showing a statistically significant link with malaria prevalence among under-five children. Findings from Nigeria and Tanzania support this relationship [28, 29]. Anaemic children were found to be more prone to malaria infection compared with non-anaemic peers, underscoring the interdependence between both conditions. Preventing malaria, therefore, also contributes to reducing anaemia rates among young children since the two conditions share common underlying causes.
Similarly, the analysis revealed that children residing in urban areas had lower malaria prevalence compared to their rural counterparts, a finding that agrees with previous research [28, 29]. This disparity is likely related to factors such as greater mosquito exposure near breeding sites, poor housing, limited economic resources, and inadequate access to healthcare or preventive tools in rural communities [15, 16].
The logistic regression analysis also showed that ITN use and care-seeking for fever were negatively associated with malaria prevalence among under-five children in Liberia. This is consistent with extensive evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa, which confirms the protective effect of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and timely medical care against malaria morbidity and mortality [2, 33, 34]. Children who did not sleep under any mosquito net had considerably higher odds of malaria infection compared with those who slept under treated ITNs, echoing findings from earlier studies. ITNs serve both as a physical shield and a chemical deterrent, reducing mosquito-human interaction and thereby lowering transmission [2]. Studies have also reaffirmed ITN use as a key protective factor, whereas non-use increases risk [29, 31]. However, their effectiveness depends on the net’s condition, consistent nightly use, and correct installation. A properly maintained ITN can reduce malaria episodes among under-five children by as much as 50% [2].
Care-seeking for fever also exhibited a negative association with malaria prevalence, suggesting that children whose caregivers sought early medical attention were more likely to receive testing and prompt treatment, preventing severe disease and continued transmission. Delays in seeking treatment contribute to ongoing infections and sustained transmission [16]. Research in Liberia, Nigeria, and Kenya also demonstrates that timely fever care, along with access to rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), substantially reduces malaria cases [29, 31]. These findings emphasize the need to strengthen healthcare availability, community awareness, and affordability of care, especially in rural and resource-limited areas.
Limitations
Although this study successfully identified predictors influencing malaria among children under five across coastal and inland counties of Liberia, it faced several limitations. These included data-related challenges such as dependence on secondary data sources, data quality and missingness, measurement errors, and recall bias, as well as limitations related to generalizability.
One of the main constraints was the reliance on secondary datasets. The study made use of pre-existing data from the Liberia Malaria Indicator Survey (LMIS) and climate/environmental databases, which restricted the range of variables available for analysis. The LMIS questionnaire might not include all the detailed behavioral, or socioeconomic indicators relevant to malaria transmission, and certain questions may not have been framed to suit the current research focus [35]. Moreover, the accuracy of the measurements for all exposures cannot be independently verified, and some important confounding variables might not have been captured.
Data quality and missing information also posed challenges. Like most household surveys, non-response and incomplete data were present. For instance, this analysis excluded children who were “not tested for malaria” or had missing records, which could introduce selection bias. Declining participation and item non-response rates in such surveys may further reduce the representativeness of the sample. In the logistic regression analysis, cases with system-missing data were excluded based on malaria status, which reduced the weighted sample size from 2,864 to 2,189.
Finally, regarding generalizability and external validity, the findings are specific to children aged 6–59 months in Liberia and may not apply to other populations or countries. Differences in malaria transmission patterns, health infrastructure, and socioeconomic contexts vary widely across regions. Therefore, what holds true for Liberia in 2022 may not necessarily apply to neighboring nations. Even within Liberia, the LMIS covered only the period from October to December 2022, so the results might not represent other seasons or years. Malaria prevalence may rise during the rainy season and decline during the dry season.
Conclusion
This study revealed that malaria among children under five is heterogenous across Liberia. Significant hotspot counties were identified in both coastal and inland regions, including Sinoe, Maryland, Grand Bassa, River Gee, Grand Kru, Lofa, and Bong. The main determinants of malaria prevalence among under-five children were ITN usage, household wealth index, and care-seeking behavior for fever, all of which showed significant influence.
This study, through the two-proportion Z-test confirmed that inland counties had significantly higher under-five malaria prevalence compared to coastal counties, indicating substantial geographical disparities. The logistic regression analysis further linked malaria infection to anemia status, child age, ITN use, household wealth, and rural residence.
Based on the study’s findings, Liberia’s malaria profile showed intense spatial heterogeneity, some coastal and inland counties such as Sinoe, Maryland, Grand Bassa, River Gee, Grand Kru, Lofa, and Bong have much higher under‑five prevalence.
To reduce malaria among children and achieve the global 2030 targets of elimination, policy must shift from uniform national approaches to targeted subnational responses, and interventions must be targeted to these hotspots based on the key risk factors identified. This underscores the need for prioritizing protecting young children and pregnant women through proven interventions like ITNs, chemoprevention, vaccination, case management and behavior change in line with WHO guidance.