AkihitoFukuoka1
JuntaYanai1✉Emailauthorï¿¿yanai@kpu.ac.jp
KengoIzumi1
ChinatsuAkagi2
HarukaMiki2
AtsushiNakao1
1Laboratory of Soil Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesKyoto Prefectural UniversityShimogamo Hangi-cho 1-5, Sakyo606-8522Kyoto-city, Kyoto-prefectureJapan
2Faculty of Life and Environmental SciencesKyoto Prefectural UniversityShimogamo Hangi-cho 1-5, Sakyo606-8522Kyoto-city, Kyoto-prefectureJapan
Akihito Fukuoka1, Junta Yanai1, 3, Kengo Izumi1,
Chinatsu Akagi2, Haruka Miki2 and Atsushi Nakao1
1Laboratory of Soil Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, Shimogamo Hangi-cho 1–5, Sakyo, Kyoto-city, Kyoto-prefecture, 606–8522, Japan
2Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, Shimogamo
Hangi-cho 1–5, Sakyo, Kyoto-city, Kyoto-prefecture, 606–8522, Japan
3Corresponding author: yanai@kpu.ac.jp
ORCID: Junta Yanai: 0000-0003-1043-9589; Atsushi Nakao: 0000-0001-8405-234X
Aims Silicon (Si) is a beneficial element for gramineous plants. Si in soil primarily originates from soil minerals but plant-derived phytoliths have recently attracted attention as an important alternative source of available Si. As the controlling factors of solubility of phytoliths remain unclear, this study investigated the solubility of phytoliths from different species and organs of gramineous plants, clarifying the physicochemical factors determining their solubility.
Methods Phytoliths were prepared from the culms, branches, and leaves of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens), the stems and leaves of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), and the straw and husks of rice (Oryza sativa) using a wet digestion method. The solubility of the phytoliths was determined via 0.2-M NaOH extraction. Their crystallinity was evaluated based on X-ray diffraction analysis.
Results The initial Si dissolution rate and maximum Si dissolution amount of the phytoliths ranged from 71.1 to 205 g Si kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ and 223 to 429 g Si kg⁻¹, respectively. Both parameters exhibited an increasing trend from the proximal to distal parts. The amounts of the opal-A and α-quartz of the phytoliths ranged from 66.7% to 97.5% and from 3.5% to 7.8%, with a negative correlation (p < 0.01). The opal-A increased from the proximal to distal parts of the plants. The initial dissolution rate and maximum dissolution amount exhibited a positive and negative correlation with the opal-A and α-quartz, respectively (p < 0.01).
Conclusion These findings elucidate the mechanism controlling Si supply from phytoliths and provide fundamental insights into their role in Si cycling in soils.
Keywords:
crystallinity
Gramineae
phytolith
Si solubility
X-ray diffraction
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Naoko Miyamaru, Okinawa Agricultural Technology & Development Co. Ltd., Mr. Yasushi Gima, Okinawa Prefectural Agricultural Research Center, and Mr. Masahiro Miyano and Mr. Masakazu Murakami in Takashima city for their assistance in carrying out this research.
Introduction
A
Silicon (Si) is the second most abundant element in soil (Bowen,
1979). Although Si is not classified as an essential element for plants, it is recognized as a beneficial element, particularly for gramineous plants such as rice and sugarcane, due to its beneficial effects on plant growth (Ma and Takahashi,
2002). These effects are attributed to the enhancement of the mechanical strength via Si accumulation, which enhances light interception, lodging resistance, and tolerance to growth stresses, such as pathogens, insect pests, high temperatures, and drought (Epstein,
1994; Liang et al.,
2015; Ma et al.,
2001; Matichenkov and Calvert,
2002). Increases in the available Si content in soils have been reported to improve the yield of gramineous crops (Marxen et al., 2016; Liang et al.,
2015; Yang et al.,
2024). However, declining available Si levels in agricultural soils have been reported (Kaneta,
2019; Tsujimoto et al.,
2014; Yang et al.,
2024). This trend is attributed to the depletion of Si via crop harvests and recent reductions in the application of silicate fertilizers, resulting from the simplification of fertilization practices and cost reductions (Guntzer et al.,
2012; Savant et al.,
1997; Yamashita et al.,
2012). In particular, this issue is anticipated to emerge in sustainable agricultural systems that rely on the Si-supplying capacity of soil (Clymans et al.,
2011; Darmawan et al., 2006).
The Si-supplying capacity of soils has conventionally been attributed primarily to soil minerals. The Si concentration in the soil solution is primarily determined by the solubility of silicate minerals (Haynes, 2017). However, in recent years, plant-derived phytoliths have received increasing attention as an alternative source of available Si. Phytoliths are primarily amorphous hydrated silica (SiO2・nH2O) structures formed via the uptake of uncharged monosilicic acid (H4SiO4) via plant roots and its deposition in shoot tissues (Li and Delvau, 2019; Mitani and Ma, 2021). Minor components of phytoliths can crystallize as α-quartz (Hinke et al., 2005; Wilding and Drees, 1974). Phytoliths accumulate in soils via the decomposition of plant biomass, including leaves, stems, and other residues (Shakoor et al., 2014). Although phytoliths generally account for only 0.1%–3.0% of the soil mass, they exhibit a solubility that is 102–104 times greater than that of soil minerals (Fraysse et al., 2009, 2010; Kondo, 1988). Therefore, the return of residues from gramineous plants, which contain large amounts of phytoliths, is an effective means of supplying Si to soils (Savant et al., 1997; Yang et al., 2020; Puppe et al., 2021). Consequently, many previous studies have focused on the Si supply from returning whole plant biomass to soil. However, only a few studies have specifically investigated the Si-release potential of phytoliths (Fraysse et al., 2009). Clarifying this aspect is essential for understanding the underlying processes involved in the Si supply via the return of phytoliths as a component of plant residues.
The ability of phytoliths to supply Si to soil is assumed to depend on their solubility. Previous studies have primarily focused on the effects of the physicochemical properties of phytoliths, particularly the interspecific differences in particle size and surface area, on their solubility (Bartoli and Wilding, 1980; Cabanes and Shahack-Gross, 2015; Wilding et al., 1979). However, because the particle size and surface area of phytoliths are primarily determined by the morphology of the plant cells in which they are deposited (Kondo, 2010), these physical parameters may explain general interspecific variations in solubility but not differences in the crystallographic structure. Therefore, this study focused on the crystallinity of phytoliths as a physicochemical factor that potentially governs phytolith solubility. Crystallinity is a key factor that influences solubility, and crystallinity differences determine the solubility of soil minerals (Haynes, 2014). In addition, we hypothesized that crystallinity differences play a critical role in determining the solubility of phytoliths. Although many previous studies have regarded phytolith crystallinity to be uniform, the crystallinity may vary depending on the plant species and the organs in which phytoliths accumulate. Thus, we considered that quantitatively evaluating the effects of plant species and organs on phytolith crystallinity and subsequently solubility under controlled conditions would improve our understanding of the solubility of phytoliths.
In this study, we aimed to 1) evaluate the solubility and crystallinity of phytoliths accumulated in different plant species and organs of gramineous plants; 2) examine the effect of the crystallinity of phytoliths on their solubility and the factors influencing their Si-supplying capacity.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of phytolith materials
Phytoliths were extracted from different plant organs of three representative gramineous species, namely, moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens), sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), and rice (Oryza sativa) using a wet digestion method (Rovner, 1971; Rosen, 1994; Jenkins, 2009) (Fig. 1).
The moso bamboo samples (culms, main branches, primary branches, secondary branches, and leaves) were collected in March 2024 from a bamboo grove in Muko City, Kyoto-Prefecture, Japan. The sugarcane samples (stems and leaves) were collected in February 2023 from the experimental fields at the Okinawa Prefectural Agricultural Research Center, Itoman City, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. The rice samples (straw and husks) were collected in September 2021 from two paddy fields in Takashima City, Shiga Prefecture, Japan.
A
After air-drying, 10 g of each plant material was placed in a 500-mL beaker and soaked overnight in 100 mL of a concentrated nitric acid (HNO
3) solution. The mixture was heated on a hot plate to 250°C while gradually increasing the temperature. When the liquid volume was reduced to 50 mL, an additional 25 mL of HNO₃ was added, and this procedure was repeated until the evolution of the brown NO
2 gas ceased. When the liquid volume was further reduced to approximately 30 mL, 15 mL of 60% perchloric acid (HClO
4) was added. This procedure was repeated twice. The heating was stopped upon the confirmation of the emission of white HClO
4 gas. After cooling, the mixture was transferred to a crucible. The crucible was heated again to 250°C, and the heating continued until the sample was almost dry. When a gel-like consistency was observed, 5 mL of 60% HClO
4 was added. After 30 min of continuous heating, 15 mL of 10% hydrochloric acid (HCl) was added. After an additional 30 min of heating, the crucible was allowed to cool. The remaining liquid was transferred to a 50-ml centrifugation tube and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and 40 mL of ultrapure water was added. The suspension was then centrifuged again under the same conditions. The washing procedure was repeated five times, and the final pellet was then freeze-dried to obtain the phytolith sample. Approximately 90% of the prepared phytolith particles possessed a diameter of less than 53 µm.
SiO₂ Standard Samples
Two types of silica (SiO2) with different crystallinities were used as the standard materials. The amorphous silica standard was represented by silicon dioxide (99.9%; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan; Cat. No. 190–09072), hereafter referred to as “A-silica.” The crystalline silica standard was represented by sea sand (300–600 µm; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan; Cat. No. 191-15955), hereafter referred to as “Sea sand.”
Analytical methods
We determined the solubility and crystallinity of the phytolith samples using 0.2-M NaOH extraction and the reference intensity ratio (RIR) method based on X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Hillier, 2000; Kurokawa et al., 2024), respectively.
We analyzed the solubility of the phytolith samples using a 0.2-M NaOH extraction method, which enabled the measurement of the total soluble Si content in the sample. The extraction method was based on the procedure described by Georgiadis et al. (2015). The phytolith or SiO2 standard sample (50.0 mg) was mixed with 0.2-M NaOH (20.0 mL) in a 50-ml centrifugation tube and shaken at 60 rpm at 25°C for 1, 3, 5, or 24 h. The suspension was then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min and filtered with a filter paper (Toyo, No.6) and a 0.45-µm Millipore filter (Advantec, DISMIC 25CS045AN). The Si concentration of the filtrate was determined by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (SPS-1500VR Plasma Spectrometer, Seiko Instruments, Tokyo). The rate of Si extraction during the initial 1 h was defined as the initial dissolution rate (g Si kg− 1 h− 1), and the amount of Si extracted after 24 h was defined as the maximum dissolution amount (g Si kg− 1) (Fig. 2). The extraction was performed in duplicate for the bamboo culm, bamboo leaf, and sugarcane leaf samples and in a single replicate for the other samples and the SiO2 standard sample.
We analyzed the crystallinity of the phytolith samples using the RIR method based on XRD analysis, as described by Kurokawa et al. (2024). The phytolith or SiO2 standard sample (200 mg) was mixed with 50 mg of corundum (α-Al2O3; Baikalox 3.0CR, Baikowski) as an internal standard. The mixture was milled using an XRD-Mill McCrone (Verder Scientific) with corundum grinding balls and 7 ml of ethanol for 10 min. After air-drying, the resulting powder was loaded onto the sample holders of an X-ray diffractometer (MiniFlex600, Rigaku) using the front-loading method. XRD analysis was performed using Cu Kα radiation with a scan range of 5°–45° (2θ), a scan speed of 10°/min, and a step size of 0.01°. From the obtained peak positions and intensities, the RIR was derived (Hillier, 2000; Kurokawa et al., 2024). The RIR value was calculated as the ratio of the highest integrated peak intensity of the reference sample to that of the corundum on the (113) plane, divided by the mass fraction ratio of the reference sample to the corundum (Eq. 1).
where ref and cor denote the reference sample and corundum, respectively; Iref and I(113)cor denote their respective integrated intensities; Xref and Xcor denote their corresponding weight fractions, respectively.
The RIR value of the amorphous SiO2 standard sample (A-silica) was calculated based on the opal-A peak at 2θ = 22.1° (Curtis et al., 2019). The RIR value of the crystalline SiO₂ standard sample (Sea sand) was calculated based on the α-quartz (101) peak at 2θ = 26.6° (Abdelkrim et al., 2011). The RIR values of the phytolith samples were calculated for both the opal-A and α-quartz peaks. The relative RIR of the phytolith sample to that of A-silica (opal-A) was calculated as the amount of the opal-A phase (i.e., amorphousness) (Eq. 2). Similarly, the relative RIR of the phytolith sample to that of Sea sand (α-quartz) was calculated as the amount of the α-quartz phase (i.e., crystallinity) (Eq. 3).
where PL and STD denote the phytolith and SiO₂ standard sample, respectively. Measurements were performed in duplicate.
In addition, we analyzed the total elemental composition of the phytolith samples using X-ray fluorescence (XRF). The phytolith samples were placed on a Mylar film (SpectroMembrane® Prolene® Thin-Film, Chemplex Industries, USA) and analyzed using an XRF spectrometer (XEPOS C, SPECTRO Analytical Instruments, Germany). The major elements in the phytoliths, including Si, Al, Fe, Mn, Mg, Ca, Na, K, and P, were quantified (Bartoli and Wilding, 1980; Kondo, 2010).
Statistical analysis
We assessed the significance of the differences in the obtained dataset using the Tukey–Kramer method. In addition, Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed between the initial dissolution rate (or maximum dissolution amount) and the opal-A (or α-quartz) phase. R version 4.2.2 was used for the analyses.
Results and Discussion
Total elemental composition of phytoliths
To evaluate the purity of the isolated phytoliths, we performed XRF analysis on the phytolith samples derived from bamboo, sugarcane, and rice (Table 1). On average, 98.3% of the phytolith content in the samples was quantified as SiO₂, suggesting the high purity of the prepared phytoliths. Small amounts of Al2O3 and K2O were also detected. Al and K can bind within the internal structure and on the external surfaces of phytoliths, as reported by Nguyen et al. (2015) and Nguyen et al. (2019). Other elements commonly reported to be present in phytoliths, such as Fe, Mn, Mg, Ca, Na, and P (Bartoli and Wilding, 1980; Kondo, 2010), were detected at concentrations below 0.1%. In addition, trace amounts of Cl were detected, which may have originated from the HCl used during the extraction process. However, their low levels indicate the effectiveness of the washing procedure in removing most residual ions.
Table 1
Total concentrations of major elements in phytoliths
Species | Organs | SiO2 | | Al2O3 | | K2O | | Cl |
|---|
(%) | | (%) | | (%) | | (%) |
|---|
Moso bamboo | Culms | 98.4 | | 0.53 | | 0.60 | | 0.51 |
Main branches | 99.2 | | 0.42 | | 0.19 | | 0.21 |
Primary branches | 98.8 | | 0.96 | | 0.12 | | 0.11 |
Secondary branches | 99.1 | | 0.41 | | 0.24 | | 0.30 |
Leaves | 99.0 | | 0.49 | | 0.26 | | 0.28 |
Sugarcane | Stems | 97.9 | | 0.77 | | 0.81 | | 0.56 |
Leaves | 96.3 | | 0.46 | | 1.72 | | 1.56 |
Rice | Straw-A | 97.3 | | 0.51 | | 1.03 | | 1.13 |
Straw-B | 98.2 | | 0.43 | | 0.29 | | 1.06 |
Husks-A | 99.4 | | 0.39 | | 0.04 | | 0.14 |
Husks-B | 98.2 | | 0.43 | | 0.08 | | 1.28 |
Main | 98.3 | | 0.53 | | 0.49 | | 0.65 |
Solubility of phytoliths
A
Table 2 shows the results of 0.2-M NaOH extraction for evaluating the solubility of the phytolith and SiO
2 standard samples. The rate of Si extraction during the initial 1 h was defined as the initial dissolution rate, and the amount of Si extracted after 24 h was defined as the maximum dissolution amount, because the system was regarded to be near equilibrium. These values were used to compare phytolith solubility across the plant species and organs (Fig.
3). The initial dissolution rates of the phytoliths were 71.1, 181, 180, 201, and 205 g kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ for the culms, main branches, primary branches, secondary branches, and leaves of bamboo, 124 and 172 g kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ for the stems and leaves of sugarcane, and 50.2, 82.6, 105, and 143 g kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ for the straw A, straw B, husk A, and husk B of rice, respectively. Among plant organs, the initial dissolution rates were in the following order: bamboo, leaves = secondary branches > primary branches = main branches > culms; sugarcane, leaves > stems; rice, husks > straw. These results suggest that the initial dissolution rate increases from the proximal part to the distal parts of the plants. The average initial dissolution rates of the bamboo, sugarcane, and rice samples were 168, 148, and 95.2 g kg⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively, with no significant differences.
The maximum dissolution amounts were 223, 364, 377, 421, and 344 g kg⁻¹ for the culms, main branches, primary branches, secondary branches, and leaves of bamboo, 296 and 317 g kg⁻¹ for the stems and leaves of sugarcane, and 232, 339, 429, and 425 g kg⁻¹ for the straw a, straw b, husk a, and husk b of rice, respectively. The sugarcane and rice samples exhibited the same trend in the maximum dissolution amount as observed in the initial dissolution rates. In contrast, the bamboo samples exhibited a different pattern: secondary branches > primary branches > main branches > leaves > culms. This indicates that the branches released more Si than the leaves, unlike the initial dissolution rate. The average maximum dissolution amount was 356 g kg⁻¹ for the rice samples, followed by 346 g kg⁻¹ for the bamboo samples and 307 g kg⁻¹ for the sugarcane samples, even though the difference was statistically insignificant. These results indicate the advantages of incorporating moso bamboo and rice for improving soil Si availability. Based on the total Si content of the phytoliths (Table 1), the maximum dissolution amount accounted for 48%, 80%, 83%, 94%, and 78% of the culms, main branches, primary branches, secondary branches, and leaves of bamboo, 68% and 76% of the stems and leaves of sugarcane, and 51%, 74%, 92% and 93% of the straw A, straw B, husk A, and husk B of rice, respectively.
Crystallinity of Phytoliths
Figure 4 presents the XRD patterns of the bamboo leaf sample and the SiO2 standard samples, i.e., A-silica and Sea sand. Appendix Fig. A shows the XRD results of the phytoliths extracted from other bamboo organs, sugarcane, and rice. The opal-A peak, derived from amorphous SiO2 and centered around 2θ = 22.1° (Curtis et al., 2019), was detected in all samples, except Sea sand. A peak derived from the (101) plane of α-quartz at 2θ = 26.6° (Abdelkrim et al., 2011) was detected in all samples, except A-silica. In addition, peaks corresponding to the internal standard corundum were primarily detected at 2θ = 25.5°, 35.2°, and 43.4°, along with aluminum peaks from the sample holder at 2θ = 38.1° and 44.3° (American Mineralogist Crystal Structure Database). The large opal-A peak in the phytolith samples was detected. A small α-quartz peak was also detected, as anticipated by Wilding and Drees (1974). We assumed that soil contamination was negligible, judging from the trace level of Al2O3 by XRF (Table 1). Furthermore, Hinke et al. (2005) reported a similar finding, where an α-quartz peak at the (101) plane was detected in the phytoliths prepared from the gramineous plant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a wet digestion method. Therefore, this peak indicates the formation of a quartz-like structure resulting from the partial polymerization and crystallization of amorphous silica within phytoliths.
The amounts of opal-A and α-quartz phases of the phytoliths are shown in Fig. 5, as calculated using Equations (2) and (3), respectively. The opal-A phases of the phytoliths were 75.0%, 94.5%, 93.8%, 93.2%, and 97.5% for the culms, main branches, primary branches, secondary branches, and leaves of bamboo, 84.1% and 85.2% for the stems and leaves of sugarcane, and 66.7%, 77.6%, 85.5%, and 86.5% for the straw A, straw B, husk A, and husk B of rice, respectively. These results indicate that among the plant organs, the opal-A phase increased from the proximal parts to the distal parts of the plant body. This may be because the distal parts of the plant body consist of younger cells than the proximal parts, resulting in less silica polymerization and crystallization, i.e., a higher degree of amorphousness. Among the plant species, the average opal-A phases were 90.8%, 84.7%, and 79.1% for the bamboo, sugarcane, and rice samples, respectively, even though the differences were statistically insignificant. The α-quartz phases of the phytoliths were 7.1%, 3.5%, 3.8%, 4.2%, and 4.6% for the culms, main branches, primary branches, secondary branches, and leaves of bamboo, 6.0% and 4.6% for the stems and leaves of sugarcane, and 6.6%, 4.8%, 3.6%, and 3.7% for the straw A, straw B, husk A, and husk B of rice, respectively. Among the plant organs, the α-quartz phases were higher in the proximal parts of the plant body than in the distal parts, exhibiting an opposite trend to the opal-A phases. This can be attributed to the time-dependent, more advanced crystallization of silica in older, proximal tissues. Previous research has also reported that the intensity of the α-quartz peak in phytoliths increased with the developmental stage of wheat (Hinke et al., 2005). The average α-quartz phases among the plant species were 4.6%, 5.3%, and 4.7% for the bamboo, sugarcane, and rice samples, respectively, with no significant differences. These findings indicate that both the opal-A and α-quartz phases of the phytoliths exhibited notable differences among the plant organs rather than the plant species, suggesting that differences in cell maturity among plant organs would mainly affect the structure or crystallinity of the phytolith.
Figure 6 shows the relationship between the α-quartz and opal-A phases of the phytoliths. A significant negative correlation was revealed between them (p < 0.01), suggesting that the formation of quartz-like structures via the crystallization of silica reduces phytolith amorphousness.
Relationship between solubility and crystallinity of phytoliths
Figure 7a and 7b show the relationship between the opal-A phase and the initial dissolution rate or the maximum dissolution amount. The opal-A phase exhibited a positive correlation with the initial dissolution rate (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). This relationship was consistently observed regardless of the plant species or organ, indicating that the initial dissolution rate (i.e., immediate solubility) of phytoliths is strongly influenced by their amorphousness. The opal-A phase also exhibited a significant positive correlation with the maximum dissolution amount; however, the correlation coefficient (r = 0.68, p < 0.05) was lower than that observed with the initial dissolution rate. Figure 7c and 7d show the relationship between the α-quartz phase and the initial dissolution rate or the maximum dissolution amount. The α-quartz phase exhibited a negative correlation with the maximum dissolution amount (r = − 0.92, p < 0.01). This relationship was consistently observed regardless of the plant species or organ, indicating that the maximum dissolution amount (or potential solubility) of phytoliths is strongly influenced by their crystallinity. Thus, the presence of quartz-like structures within the phytoliths was considered a factor contributing to the reduction of their maximum dissolution amount. The α-quartz phase also exhibited a negative correlation with the initial dissolution rate; however, the correlation coefficient (r = − 0.65, p < 0.05) was lower than that observed with the maximum dissolution amount. This result is considered reasonable, because the immediate solubility is primarily influenced by the amorphous fractions and less affected by quartz-like structures.
Collectively, these results indicate that the immediate solubility (initial dissolution rate) and potential solubility (maximum dissolution amount) of phytoliths are strongly dependent on their amorphousness and crystallinity, respectively.
Conclusion
The solubility–crystallinity relationship of phytoliths derived from various organs was investigated using three gramineous plants, i.e., moso bamboo, sugarcane, and rice. Based on the initial dissolution rate and maximum dissolution amounts, as determined using 0.2-M NaOH extraction, the phytolith solubility tended to increase from the proximal parts to the distal parts. The opal-A phase, as determined by the XRD analysis, ranged from 66.7% to 97.5% and tended to increase from the proximal parts to the distal parts. These results suggest that the selection of the distal parts is advantageous when incorporating plant residues into agricultural soils to enhance their available Si content. Based on the maximum dissolution amount results, moso bamboo and rice are feasible options for such incorporation. A significant positive correlation was observed between the opal-A phase and the initial Si dissolution rate (p < 0.01). Conversely, a significant negative correlation was observed between the α-quartz phase and the maximum Si dissolution amount (p < 0.01), suggesting the strong influence of the crystallinity of phytoliths on their solubility. These findings provide fundamental insights into the role of phytoliths in Si cycling in soils and a foundation for developing strategies for enhancing plant-available Si in agricultural systems, such as the incorporation of leaves and branches of moso bamboo into soil after appropriate manuring.
A
Author contributions
Junta Yanai and Atsushi Nakao conceived the idea and designed the experiment. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Akihito Fukuoka, Kengo Izumi, Chinatsu Akagi and Haruka Miki. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AF with substantial input from JY and AN. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
A
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abdelkrim K, Yassine B, Aissa K, Nadjib D (2011) Silica sand etching behavior during a primary step of its leaching process. AIP Conf Proc Am Inst Phys 1315:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3552453
Bartoli F, Wilding LP (1980) Dissolution of biogenic opal as a function of its physical and chemical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(4):873–878. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400040043x
Bowen HJM (1979) Environmental Chemistry of the Elements. Academic, London
Cabanes D, Shahack-Gross R (2015) Understanding fossil phytolith preservation: the role of partial dissolution in paleoecology and archaeology. PLoS ONE 10:e0125532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125532
Clymans W, Struyf E, Govers G, Vandevenne F, Conley DJ (2011) Anthropogenic impact on amorphous silica pools in temperate soils. Biogeosciences 8(8):2281–2293. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2281-2011
Curtis N, Gascooke J, Johnston M, Pring A (2019) A Review of the Classification of Opal with Reference to Recent New Localities. Minerals 9(5):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9050299
A
Darmawan, Kyuma K, Saleh A, Subagjo H, Masunaga T, Wakatsuki T (2006) Effect of long-term intensive rice cultivation on the available silica content of sawah soils: Java Island, Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52(6):745–753.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.00089.xEpstein E (1994) The anomaly of silicon in plant biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91(1):11–17. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.1.1
Fraysse F, Pokrovsky OS, Schott J, Meunier JD (2009) Surface chemistry and reactivity of plant phytoliths in aqueous solutions. Chem Geol 258(3–4):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.003
Fraysse F, Pokrovsky OS, Meunier JD (2010) Experimental study of terrestrial plant litter interaction with aqueous solutions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74(1):70–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.09.002
Georgiadis A, Sauer D, Breuer J, Herrmann L, Rennert T, Stahr K (2015) Optimising the extraction of amorphous silica by NaOH from soils of temperate-humid climate. Soil Res 53:392–400. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR14171
Guntzer F, Keller C, Poulton PR, McGrath SP, Meunier JD (2012) Long-term removal of wheat straw decreases soil amorphous silica at Broadbalk, Rothamsted. Plant Soil 351:173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0987-4
Haynes RJ (2014) A contemporary overview of silicon availability in agricultural soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:831–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201400202
Haynes RJ (2017) The nature of biogenic Si and its potential role in Si supply in agricultural soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ 245:100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.04.021
Hillier S (2000) Accurate quantitative analysis of clay and other minerals in sandstones by XRD: Comparison of a Rietveld and a reference intensity ratio (RIR) method and the importance of sample preparation. Clay Min 35(1):291–302. https://doi.org/10.1180/000985500546666
Hinke S, Marx G, Fehlhaber R, Wienhaus O (2005) Analytical methods for the characterisation of leaf surfaces: a contribution to understand the processes of biomineralization. Appl Surf Sci 252:113–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.01.108
Jenkins E (2009) Phytolith taphonomy: a comparison of dry ashing and acid extraction on the breakdown of conjoined phytoliths formed in Triticum durum. J Archaeol Sci 36(10):2402–2407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.06.028
Kaneta Y (2019) Recent changes in paddy soils and strategy for sustainable rice production. J Jpn Soc Soil Phys 141:41–48. https://doi.org/10.34467/jssoilphysics.141.0_41
Kondo R (1988) Soil genesis and ages of soils from the viewpoint of opal phytolith analysis. Pedologist 32(2):189–203. https://doi.org/10.18920/pedologist.32.2_189
Kondo R (2010) Plant opal atlas: An introduction to phytolith science through scanning electron microscopy. Hokkaido University, Japan
Kurokawa K, Azuma A, Nakao A, Suzuki A, Wakabayashi S, Fujimura S, Shinano T, Yanai J (2024) Examination of the reliability of X-ray powder diffraction analysis to determine mineral composition of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 88:1942–1958. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20757
Liang YC, Nikolic M, Belanger R, Gong H, Song A (2015) Silicon in Agriculture: From Theory to Practice. Springer, Dordrecht
Li Z, Delvaux B (2019) Phytolith-rich biochar: A potential Si fertilizer in desilicated soils. Gcb Bioenergy 11(11):1264–1282. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12635
Ma JF, Miyake Y, Takahashi E (2001) Silicon as a beneficial element for crop plants. Stud Plant Sci 8:17–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-3420(01)80006-9
Ma JF, Takahashi E (2002) Soil, Fertilizer, and Plant Silicon Research in Japan. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Matichenkov VV, Calvert DV (2002) Silicon as a beneficial element for sugarcane. J Am Soc Sugar Cane Technol 22:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102944
Mitani N, Ma JF (2021) 13. Mechanism of silicon transport in plants. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 92(2):160–165. https://doi.org/10.20710/dojo.92.2_160
Nguyen MN, Dultz S, Picardal F, Bui Anh TK, Pham QV, Schieber J (2015) Release of potassium accompanying the dissolution of rice straw Phytolith. Chemosphere 119:371–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.059
Nguyen MN, Dultz S, Meharg A, Pham QV, Hoang AN, Dam Than TN, Nguyen VT, Nguyen KM, Nguyen HX, Nguyen NT (2019) Phytolith content in Vietnamese paddy soils in relation to soil properties. Geoderma 333:200–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.027
Puppe D, Kaczorek D, Schaller J, Barkusky D, Sommer M (2021) Crop straw recycling prevents anthropogenic desilication of agricultural soil–plant systems in the temperate zone–Results from a long-term field experiment in NE Germany. Geoderma 403:115187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115187
Rosen AM, Weiner S (1994) Identifying ancient irrigation: a new method using opaline phytoliths from emmer wheat. J Archaeol Sci 21(1):125–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1994.1013
Rovner I (1971) Potential of opal phytoliths for use in paleoecological reconstruction. Quat Res 1(3):343–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(71)90070-6
Shakoor SA, Bhat MA, Mir SH (2014) Phytoliths in plants: A Review. Res Rev J Bot Sci 3
Savant NK, Datnoff LE, Snyder GH (1997) Depletion of plant-available silicon in soils: A possible cause of declining rice yields. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 28(13–14):1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629709369870
Tsujimoto Y, Muranaka S, Saito K, Asai H (2014) Limited Si-nutrient status of rice plants in relation to plant-available Si of soils, nitrogen fertilizer application, and rice-growing environments across Sub-Saharan Africa. Field Crops Res 155:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.003
Wilding LP, Drees LR (1974) Contributions of forest opal and associated crystalline phases to fines silt and clay fractions of soils. Clays Clay Min 22(3):295–306. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1974.0220311
Wilding LP, Hallmark CT, Smeck NE (1979) Dissolution and stability of biogenic opal. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43(4):800–802. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300040037x
Yamashita K, Komiyama T, Nizuma S (2012) Utilization and research of silicon in recent agriculture. 3. Development and transition of siliceous materials, and current status of materials used in the field. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 83(5):613–619. https://doi.org/10.20710/dojo.83.5_613
Yang X, Song Z, Qin Z, Wu L, Yin L, Van Zwieten L, Song A, Ran X, Yu C, Wang H (2020) Phytolith-rich straw application and groundwater table management over 36 years affect the soil-plant silicon cycle of a paddy field. Plant Soil 454(1):343–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04656-4
Yang X, Ni Y, Li Z, Yue K, Wang J, Li Z, Yang X, Song Z (2024) Silicon in paddy fields: Benefits for rice production and the potential of rice phytoliths for biogeochemical carbon sequestration. Sci Total Environ 929:172497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172497
Table 2 Temporal changes of extracted Si from phytoliths using 0.2 M NaOH
Appendix Figure A. XRD patterns of phytoliths. (a) Bamboo, (b) Sugarcane, (c) Rice.