Risk Factors Driving Urban Youth Unemployment in Nekemte Oromia Ethiopia Through Cross Sectional Labor Market Analysis Using Logistic Regression”
1Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia
1*Habtamu Tolera.
HabtamuTolera1✉Email
1Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, College of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWollega UniversityNekemteEthiopia
1*Corresponding Author: Habtamu Tolera, habtol@yahoo.com(HT), orcid.org/0000-0001-5967-1237.
Abstract
Objective.
This study conducted in Nekemte City, Eastern Wollega, Oromia, Ethiopia where over two million youth enroll the labour market in cities annually, and lack of employment is still a serious problem. This study aims at assessing the extent and underlying risks of urban unemployment among young people in the study setting.
Methods
A
The study employed a cross-sectional household-based design and a random sample of 463 youth was recruited using a multi-stage sampling process in four purposively selected sub-cities in Nekemte. Standard household survey questionnaires were adopted and A pilot study was conducted on 10% of the overall sample, selected from a neighboring sub-city, to validate the data collection tools and procedure. A group of eight enumerators and four supervisors was recruited and well trained to reassure quality of data collection. The data was entered and cleaned up using EpiData 3.1 and finally analyzed using SPSS version 24.0. The Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) > 10 indicates redundancy among explanatory variables, and a binary logistic regression model was adjusted to identify determinant factors influencing urban youth unemployment in the study area.
Results
The descriptive results show a response rate of 94.0%, 68% prevalence of unemployment with over two-thirds (67.5%) of rural out-migrants citing insecurity as the primary driver. Furthermore, 78% demonstrated lack of access to credit, 60% cited poor employment-seeking habits, 67.3% reported psychological strain, and 59.5% experienced socio-economic hardships of reduced living standards. The adjusted odds ratios show clear association of unemployment with gender: female youth were 4.13 times more likely to be unemployed than males [AOR = 4.13; 95% CI: 2.2–7.7, p < 0.05]. The findings also show that youths aged 19 years or younger were 2.19 times more likely to be unemployed compared to their counterparts who aged 20 or older [AOR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.2–3.9; p < 0.05], youths who lacked access to credit were 5.34 times more likelihoods of being unemployed [AOR = 5.34; 95% CI: 2.8–9.8; p < 0.05] than their counterparts. Socio-economic and demographic factors, particularly insecurity-induced youth migrants and youths without entrepreneurial competencies, experienced 1.86 and 5.49 times higher risk of unemployment [AOR = 5.49; 95% CI: 1.5–9.7; p = 0.05] compared to their counterparts, respectively. Job creation deficits by local municipal authorities and the mismatch between acquired skills and labor market demands among industries increased risks of urban youth unemployment by 2.08 and 3.22 times higher than respective counterparts, respectively. Conclusion: proposed program interventions include considering females, youth aged 19 years or younger, making ease access to financial credits, aligning acquired skills to labor market demand, improving business skills, offering psychological support services, and promoting job creation strategies by the municipal. Realizing these predictors was essential to address the demographic, structural, socio-economic and psychological factors associated with the increasing unemployment risks in the study setting.
Click here to Correct
Click here to Correct
Keywords:
urban youth
risk factor
WHO
urban unemployment
Nekemte
Oromia
Adjusted Odds Ratio
Ethiopia
Background
How people think about youth varies widely depending on their background and perspective (Seatzu, 2022). These views are shaped by a mix of social, economic, political, and cultural factors, as well as the broader systems and structures they live within(Sin, 2024). For example, the UN Secretariat, UNICEF, WHO, UNFPA, and ILO describe youth as individuals aged between 15 and 24 years(United Nations., 2008), UN Habitat(The UN-Habitat, 2025) broadens to 15 to 32 years age, African Youth Charter (Seatzu, 2022) define it 15 to 35 years, and OECD sets 15 to 29 years old. However, all definitions consider change from childhood to adulthood, which includes going to school, seeking work, and learning how to apply responsibility and make informed decisions(OECD, 2018). The complex problem of youth unemployment includes economic, social, and political issues(Gupte and Barnett, 2014). Moreover, exploring global youth unemployment poses challenges since youth unemployment basically depends on a country's specific socio-political and economic conditions, structural and institutional contexts, and educational systems(Sin, 2024)
Currently, there are roughly 1.2 billion people aged between 15 to 24 years in the global south alone, comprising 16% of the total population worldwide(Population Reference Bureau, 2017). Research from Low and Middle Income Countries(LMICs) consistently shows that the rates of unemployment among youth excel those of adult populations(Munyao, 2014; Pieters, 2013). Sources indicate over 88 million individuals are actively looking for decent work, with youth making up 47% of the world unemployment figure (Mastercard Foundation, 2020; Seatzu, 2022; The UN-Habitat, 2025; United Nations Population Fund., 2023). Among more than 1.3 billion youth people aged between 15 and 24 years worldwide, 85% found in LMICs, primarily in Asia and Africa(Fung & Nga, 2022). It was also anticipated that this figure believed to be increased to 89.5% by the year 2025(United Nations., 2019). In sub-Sharan Africa(sSA), total youth population aged between 15 and 24 years accounts for one-fifth of the total (Gupte and Barnett, 2014; ILO, 2024). Even though young people comprises 36% of the economically active labor force, they are the overwhelming majority group without jobs in the area. Likewise, Ethiopia the second-most populous in the part of sSA, is also experiencing a rapid increase in demographic size raising by about 2.3% per year(Ethiopian Statistics Service., 2022; Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 2020), accompanied by high rate of youth unemployment(Broussar and Tekleselassie, 2012) largely due to the slow job-creating capacity that have not kept pace with the country's significant demographic changes(Industry(, 2019). Youths account for 28.3% of the Ethiopian population (Ethiopian Statistics Service., 2022; United Nations Population Fund., 2023), with an imperative number aged between 15 and 24 years. However, this change faces unemployment rates that surpass those of older age cohort in urban areas of the country including Nekemte City (Ethiopian Statistics Service., 2022; Netherlands Enterprise Agency, 2020).
The engagement of youth in sustainable socioeconomic development program is essential for building resilient economies that are equitable, secure, and enduring(Caribbean Development Bank, 2016; Tegegne, 2019; United Nations., 2019) while also addressing the severe challenges and risks to sustainable development(OECD, 2018). They include climate change impacts, unemployment, poverty, gender inequality, conflict, and migration(United Nations., 2019). The challenges drive significant global social and economic malaise(The UN-Habitat, 2025; UNICEF, 1992; United Nations., 2008). A heavy number of youths in LMICs including Ethiopia, encounter risks in securing decent and productive job market(World Bank Group., 2025). A ranges of sources indicate how crucial it is to address lack of job among youth in rapidly growing urbanization countries like Ethiopia(World Bank Group., 2025). The challenge is caused by deep rooted drivers in society, namely structural obstacles and demographic changes due to rural out-migrations (Abdurahman and Ahmed, 2021), lack of formal job markets(Kassa, 2012; Lam and Leibbrandt, 2014), sluggish economic growth(Mago, 2014), and deviation between educational outcomes and labor market needs(Kibru, 2012; Msigwa and Kipesha, 2013; Mulatu, 2022) together with weak institutional action(Msigwa and Kipesha, 2013; Puente, 2025).
Ethiopia introduced various strategies to overcome problems of job basically driven by weak structural systems(Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 2020; Habiyaremye et al., 2022; OECD, 2018). The National Youth Development and Change Strategy (2017) was the major initiative to offer young people with jobs and to help the country rely less on farming by fostering industrial parks as a means for industrialization(Zhang et al., 2018, Ethiopian Ministry of Labor and Skills, 2017) ). The Federal Job Creation Commission (2018) also adopted plans to create three million jobs by 2020, fourteen million by 2025, and twenty million by 2030 establishing huge number of industries across Ethiopia for the growing number of urban youths (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 2020). Moreover, the Youth Revolving Fund program was formally established in the year 2017 with a proclamation No. 995/2017 to help youth create viable businesses and to provide financial and technical support to realize their productive potential(Ethiopian Ministry of Labor and Skills, 2017). Besides government program, organizations have also significantly promoted young people to find work in Ethiopia(Jubane, 2021). The Master Card Foundation(2019) launched several youth-focused initiatives through skills training, access to finance, entrepreneurship support, and policy reform with a goal of helping 10 million young people, with a focus on young women find job(Mastercard Foundation, 2020). The Challenge Fund for Youth Employment(The World Bank Group, 2021), also produces two thousands of jobs focusing on starting businesses, job training, and improving skills(World Bank Group., 2025).
Despite several efforts to overcome the problems of unemployment, Ethiopia still boasts the largest youth population share at 21.8% at the world level(Population Reference Bureau, 2017). Sources underscore the country must work hard for two-million people looking for jobs each year (Kelly and Martinez, 2018). Youth unemployment rates are very dynamic in the country and in the year 2021, the rate stood at 6.4%(The World Bank Group, 2021). Even though the rate fell a bit to 5.43% in the year 2024, ongoing structural failures still make the problem hard for more youth to find jobs (United Nations Population Fund., 2023). In Oromia, the rate is highly increasing at 40%(Wakgari, 2022). More recent studies showed continued deep-rooted structural problems unfavorably affect urban youths’ employment in Oromia(Mulu et al., 2022). Likewise, in Nekemte, there are more than sixty thousand young people (aged between 15 and 29 years), and over half are women (Ethiopian Statistics Service., 2022).
Existing empirical studies report about youth unemployment problems in urban Ethiopia (Abdurahman and Ahmed, 2021; Munyao, 2014), however, very few focus on Nekemte City. Assessing the specific local contexts why urban youths are unemployed is, however, very important to inform the prevailing job market policy(Abebe, 2015; Duguma, 2019; Lebakeng and Matebese-Notshulwana, 2024).
Furthermore, earlier studies typically explore trends across the whole Ethiopia, most often without considering factors such as population, social-economic problems, psychology problems, local institutions and structural issues that significantly influencing urban unemployment in cities including Nekemte (Caribbean Development Bank, 2016; De Lannoy et al., 2018; Hove et al., 2013; Suva, 2015). Particularly, structural/institutional and psychological factors are often overlooked dimensions in urban youth unemployment studies(Abdurahman and Ahmed, 2021). psychological stress is more importantly a powerful and often overlooked aspects that I can use it as a variable to explore how mental and emotional strain affects job-seeking behavior, employability, and long-term career outcome(Duresso and Gebreegziabher, 2020; Pereira, et. al., 2021; Ronzon et al., 2025) Hence, this research aims at exploring factors influencing urban unemployment among youth in Nekemte City, Eastern Wollega, Oromia Region, Ethiopia.
Methodology
Study setting and period
The study was conducted from December 2, 2024, to April 30, 2025 in the Nekemte City, which lies approximately 330 km directly west of the Addis Ababa (the national capital), in the east Wollega Zone, Oromia Region. The total area of the city was 3.043 square kilometers and divided into six administrative sub-cities. According to the 2019 population projection release and Oromia Regional State (2019), the city had a total population of 125,157, including 61,634 urban youth aged between 15 and 29(Ethiopian Statistics Service., 2022). See Fig. 1
A
Fig. 1
Location of the study area Source: Esri. (2020). ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.8.
Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute
Study design and population
A community-based, cross-sectional design was employed to study urban youths aged between 15 and 29-years-old who had been living in the city in the last six months preceding to the survey.
Sample and Recruitment
A
A two-stage sampling method was employed in order to select respondents who lived in the study area during the reference period. In stage one four sub-cities (Darge, Chalalaki, Bake Jama, and Burka Jato) were purposively selected due to high concentration of unemployed youth compared to the rest and in the second stage simple random sampling technique (a random number table) was employed to randomly select samples with the consideration given to the size of the respective sub-cities.
The source population for this study was all youth aged between 15 and 29 years old living in the four sub-cities under investigation in Nekemte and from this youth population, a sample of 463 participants was randomly selected to serve as the study subjects. To determine the suitable sample size (n) required for the study a researcher used the formula proposed by(Kothari, 2004). That was,
n=
In the first step initial sample (n) calculation was determined using the standard formula for sample size estimation as follows (Kelsey et al., 1996) with:
Confidence level: 95% (Z = 1.96)
Margin of error: 5% (e = 0.05)
Estimated proportion (p): 0.2
Q = 1-p
Estimated source population (N = 9, 202), own estimated count.
Next, since the source population was less than ten thousand finite population correction was applied to adjust for population size(Pallant, 2020). Therefore, a design effect adjustment and a two-stage sampling method was applied due to selection at sub-city and household levels(Ethiopian Statistics Service., 2022). A design effect of two (2) was employed, resulting in a sample size of 454 (227 * 2). Furthermore, a 2% contingency was added to account for potential non-response and data loss. Thus, the final sample size became 463 urban youth(Kelsey., 1996).
Exclusion and inclusion criteria
Youths were considered eligible if they fulfilled the definition of young individuals(Ethiopian Statistics Service., 2022), as used in this study and had resided constantly in Nekemte City for at least six months prior to the time of data collection (Kelsey., 1996). participants were excluded from the study if they were younger than 15 or older than 29 years, or if they had resided in the study area for less than six months prior to data collection, as this duration was deemed insufficient for meaningful exposure to local conditions.
Data collection and quality control
Data were collected using a structured survey questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed in English and translated to Afan Oromo by staff of the English and Afan Oromo departments of Wollega University. The questionnaire comprise current status of employment, demographic, structural and institutional, socio-economic, psychological and financial characteristics affecting urban youth’s occupational status in Nekemte(OECD, 2018). Data were collected by eight enumerators holding BA degrees in the social science disciplines and all had prior experience directing field work in similar studies in the area. Data collection process was supervised by four supervisors recruited from among local officials and coordinated by the principal investigator. The enumerators and supervisors were trained for 3–4 days in data collection techniques and ethics. A pilot study involving 10% of the study population was conducted an adjacent sub-city to validate the data collection tools and procedure(Pallant, 2020). Important revisions, therefore, were made based on the analysis from pretest. The supervisors and the investigator monitored field activities and checked all the complete questionnaires and missing information daily to ensure validity and reliability. Questionnaires thought incomplete were returned to data collectors for completion. To ensure respondents anonymity, no personal identifiers were noted, and confidentiality was completely preserved(Berg, 2009).
Outcome
Urban youth employment status was here redefined into three (International Labour Organization (ILO)5) nominal groups: (1) Employed youth who had worked for pay or profit during a reference period, including formal and salaried employment); informal employment like street vending, casual labor, etc; self-employment or unpaid work in a family business(Group I), (2) Unemployed youth who were not working but were actively seeking work, and were available to start work(Group II), (3) Inactive youth who were not in employment, education, or training (Group III). The outcome variable in this study was the employment status of urban youth in Nekemte City the case of the first two youth group. This study did not include inactive youth due to the absence of such cases in the sampled population of Nekemte City. Therefore, the analysis emphasized completely on youth who were either employed or unemployed and the outcome variable was code as
(the studied group) and
employed (the reference group) in the model. This means the regression estimates the log-odds of being unemployed compared to being employed. This binary classification, therefore, enables the use of logistic regression the right choice to identify factors influencing urban youth unemployment in the study setting.
Explanatory variables
According to (International Labour Organization, 2019) youth were individuals aged between 15 and 24 years. However, this study adopts a wider range between 15 and 29 years that alignment with national demographic classifications (CSA, 2019).
Demographic factors such as gender of urban youth has a binary categorical variable defined as (1 = female youth, 0 = male youth), age group of urban youth (in year) classified as a binary variable (19 years or younger, 20 years or older), marital status coded as a binary categorical variable (1 = single/divorced/widowed/separated, 0 = married); youth background by geographic origin as a binary category (1 = rural youth, 0 = urban area), security-induced rural youth migration was a binary categorical variable (1 = youth migrated out from a rural area due to security concerns, otherwise, no).
Perceived structural and institutional factors were educational level of both urban youth and youth’s household (College/university/vocational training; secondary education (Grades 9 − 2); primary education (Grades 1–8), cannot read & write). Youth’s sub-city as a nominal variable (Darge, Bakanisa Kesso, Chalalaki, Burka Jato), local job creation deficit of municipal coded as a binary variable (1 = yes if youth perceives a lack of adequate job creation efforts by the municipality, 0 = no if did not perceive deficit), local government capacity to attract investment as a binary variable (1 = yes if it is perceived as weak and discouraging investment attraction; otherwise, no) and population pressure is a binary variable (1 = yes if youth perceives high population growth as a contributing challenge, otherwise, no).
Perceived psychological factors were self-reported psychological impact of unemployment is a binary variable (1 = yes if youth perceives psychological stress that affects unemployment like stress, anxiety and loss of motivation; otherwise, no), job aspiration as binary category (1 = public job, 0 = any available job).
Perceived socio-economic factors such as youth’s exposure to market information as a binary variable coded as (1 = no if youth lacks exposure; otherwise, yes), mismatch between acquired skills and labor market demands (1 = no if acquired skills did not match labor market demands, otherwise, yes), prior work history coded as (1 = no if youth had no previous employment experience, otherwise, yes), medium of job search (0 = media, 1 = job board, 2 = friends), job search habit (1 = no if youth did not actively engage in job-seeking behavior, 0 = yes), sector-based job vacancy disparities (1 = yes if youth thought unequal job opportunities across economic sectors, otherwise, no), experienced socioeconomic shocks (1 = yes if youth experienced serious socioeconomic problems, particularly financial hardships reduced living standard; otherwise, no), deficiencies in entrepreneurial competencies(1 = yes if they had no basic skills like business planning, financial literacy and innovation; otherwise, no).
Perceived financial factors were access to financial credit as nominal variable (1 = yes if youth had access to any financial lending, otherwise, no), income level of the youth’s household (1 = low income if the households fell in the bottom 40%; 0 = high income if they fell in the top 60%). See Fig. 2
A
Fig. 2
Conceptual framework guiding the study of urban youth employment status, own construction based-on literature (2025)
A logistic regression model for the likelihood of an event occurring (youth unemployment) was expressed as(Lemeshow and Hosmer, 2000; Pallant, 2020):
Where,
represents the probability that a given individual is unemployed.
is the dependent variable indicating the employment status of urban youth in Nekemte City (1 for unemployed, otherwise, 0)
α is the intercept term.
represents the coefficient of the explanatory variable
are an independent variable
influencing urban youth unemployment
Data processing and analysis
All the questionnaires were checked manually, coded and entered into EpiData version 3.1, and exported to SPSS Version 24.0 (SPSS; IBM Corp; USA) for analysis. The data were cleaned to check for errors and missed values and any error identified was corrected. Descriptive statistics, particularly cross-tabs were used to calculate the frequency distribution and proportions for categorical variables. The Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) > 10 indicates redundancy among explanatory variables. Urban youth’s employment status model satisfied this criterion with VIF < 2.0 and therefore all variables were retained. Associations between binary outcome variable (urban youth employment status) and explanatory variables were determined by the use of the univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models.
All the significant variables in the bivariate analysis (p < 0.05) were included in the multivariable logistic (MVL) regression model because univariate association between two variables did not necessarily tell us a significant causal relationship between them(Rana and Singhal, 2015; Teshita, 2018). Therefore, a multivariate approach was applied to determine which factors best explain and predict urban youth employment outcome. The adequacy of the developed model was verified through the standard statistical mean of likelihood ratio test of goodness of fit(Lemeshow and Hosmer, 2000). Multicollinearity in the MVL model was detected by examining the standard error for the coefficients(Pallant, 2020) Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with corresponding 95% CI estimates were used to describe the strength of associations of factors with unemployed urban youth versus employed one. The association of variables was found to be statistically significant at p < 0.05(Rana and Singhal, 2015).
Result
A
A
A
A
Background characteristics respondents
This study uses both descriptive and inferential statistics to analyze data collected through the questionnaire The study sampled out 463 urban youths in Nekemte City, however, the response rate was 94.3%(437 questionnaires). The overwhelming majority of the respondents (76%) were female youth. The mean age of the survey participants was 22.1 years with the standard deviation of 7.1 years, 71.2% were unmarried, more than two-thirds (67.5%) had rural backgrounds in origin, 27.2% had completed high school, 24.7% were illiterate and the remaining respondents (24.5%) achieved their college education or higher. Twenty-nine percent of households heads had completed high school education, 25.6% were illiterate and 25.4% had finished their primary education. Forty percent of respondents were located in Darge, 28.6% in Kasso, 18.8% in Chalalaki and the remaining were in Burka Jato sub-City.
A large percentage of the participants (78.0%) cited obtaining financial credit was a major problem. Over half (51.3%) reported they looked for job opportunities through boards/employment offices, 37.3% used their friends, and a small portion (11.4%) were dependent on media. It was also found that 61.0% report no prior work history, 60.0% reported they had no job-seeking habits; 71.68% felt a variation in job vacancies among fields of study and 89.01% raised no exposure to market information. The analysis also showed that more than two-thirds felt psychological emotional strain as a driver for being unemployed; 260 (59.5%) felt socio-economic hardships like reduced living standards, 63.85% cited insecurity-induced rural youth out migration which pushes them to urban centers; more than three-quarters mentioned deficiencies in entrepreneurial competencies to begin their businesses; 77.1% thought local job creation deficit by municipal authorities, 51.3% cited population pressures; 78.49% reported mismatch between acquired skills and labor market demands; 80.3% raised local government limit to attract investment in and around Nekemte, exacerbating youth unemployment in the study setting(Table 1).
Table 1
Background characteristics of urban youth in Nekemte City (N = 437, Year 2025)
Characteristics
indicators
Categories
Number(n)
Percent (%)
Demographic
Gender of youth
Male
105
24.0
  
Female
332
76.0
 
Age of youth (in year)
19 or younger
122
27.9
  
20–29
315
72.1
 
Marital status
Married
126
28.8
  
aOthers
311
71.2
 
Youth background by geographic origin
Urban
140
32.5
  
Rural
297
67.5
 
Insecurity-induced rural youth out migration
No
158
36.2
  
Yes
279
63.8
Structural
Educational level of youth
illiterate
108
24.7
  
Primary
103
23.6
  
Secondary
119
27.2
  
College or higher
107
24.5
 
Educational level of household head
illiterate
112
25.6
  
Primary
111
25.4
  
Secondary
128
29.3
  
College or higher
86
19.7
 
Youth’s sub-city
Darge
176
40.2
  
Bakanisa Kesso
125
28.6
  
Chalalaki
82
18.8
  
Burka Jato
54
12.4
 
Local job creation deficit of municipal authorities
No
100
22.9
  
Yes
337
77.1
 
Local government limit to attract investment
No
86
19.7
  
Yes
351
80.3
 
Population pressure
No
213
48.7
  
Yes
224
51.3
Psychological
Psychological emotional strain
No
143
32.7
  
Yes
294
67.3
 
Job aspiration
Any available job
173
39.59
  
Public job
264
60.41
Socio-economic
Youth’s exposure to market information
Yes
52
11.89
  
No
385
89.01
 
Mismatch between acquired skills and labor market demands
No
94
21.51
  
Yes
343
78.49
 
Prior work history
Yes
170
38.91
  
No
267
61.09
 
Medium of job search
Media
50
11.4
  
Boards
224
51.3
  
Friends
163
37.3
 
job-search habits
Yes
175
40.0
  
No
262
60.0
 
Sector-based job vacancy variation
No
124
28.4
  
Yes
313
71.6
 
Socio-economic hardships like reduced living standard
No
177
40.5
  
Yes
260
59.5
 
Deficiencies in entrepreneurial competencies
No
113
25.9
  
Yes
324
74.1
Financial
Access to financial credit
Yes
96
21.97
  
No
341
78.03
 
Household income level
High
105
24.03
  
Low
332
75.97
aOthers: single/widowed/widow/divorced
Prevalence of urban youth unemployment in the study area
According to this survey more than two-thirds of the population in urban areas (68.0%) were unemployed (see Table 2). Chalalaki sub-City experienced the highest unemployment rate (70.7%), followed by Darge (69.3%) and Bakanisa Kasso (65.6%) whereas Burka Jato had relatively exhibited the lowest unemployment rate accounting for 64.8% of study participants being jobless.
Table 2
Urban youth unemployment rates in Nekemte (N = 437), 2025
Variable
Number(n)
Percent(%)
Unemployed youth by sub-city
  
Darge
122
69.3
Bakanisa Kasso
82
65.6
Chalalaki
58
70.7
Burka Jato
35
64.8
Total
297
68.0
Of the total sample respondents participated in this survey, 140 (32.0%) were employed. Burka Jato sub-City had the highest number of youths with jobs (35.2%) followed by Bakanisa Kasso (34.4%) and Darge (30.7%) where as Chalalaki had the lowest of all (see Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Presents employed youth by sub-city administration, 2025
Click here to Correct
Risk Factors influencing urban youth unemployment in Nekemte City
Table 3. Presents Unadjusted Odds Ratio (UOR) and Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) emphasizing the main risk factors associated with urban youth unemployment. Hence, confounding effects were determined by checking changes in the association between predictors and outcome variable (status of urban youth employment) before and after multivariable adjustment.
Table 3
Presents risk factors associated with urban youth unemployment in Nekemte City, Oromia Region, Ethiopia (N = 437, 2025).
Factor
Variable and categories
Unemployed = 1, Employed = 0 (Base Model)
 
Demographic risk factors
 
Unemployed (n(%)
Employed (n(%)
COR(95% CI)
AOR(95% CI)
Gender of urban youth
    
Male
50(47.6)
55(52.4)
1
1
Female
247(74.4)
85(25,6)
3.2(2.1–5.04)
4.1(2.2–7.7)**
Age group of urban youth (in year)
    
20 or older
72(59.0)
50(41.0)
1
1
19 or younger
225(71.4)
90(28.6)
1.7(1.1–2.6)
2.1(1.2–3.9)*
Marital status
    
Married
81(64.3)
45(35.7)
1
 
bOthers
216(69.5)
95(30.5)
1.2(0.8–1.9)
 
Youth background by geographic origin
    
Urban
77(54.2)
65(45.8)
1
1
Rural
220(74.6)
75(25.4)
.4(1.6–3.7)
0.40(0.1–1.3)
Security-induced rural-out youth migration
  
1
 
No
86(54.4)
72(45.6)
1
1
Yes
211(75.6)
68(24.4)
1.8(1.0-3.3)
1.86(1.0-3.2)*
Structural and institutional riskfactors
Educational level of urban youth
    
College and Higher
81(75.0)
27(25.0)
1
 
Secondary
78(75.7)
25(24.3)
1.0 (0.6–1.9)
 
Primary
76(63.9)
43(36.1)
0.6(0.3–1.1)
 
Cannot read & write
62(57.9)
45(42.1)
0.5(0.2–0.8)
 
Educational level of household
    
College/Higher
78(69.6)
34(30.4)
1
 
Secondary
74(66.7)
37(33.3)
0.8(0.4–1.5)
 
Primary
86(67.2)
42(32.8)
0.8(0.5–1.5)
 
Cannot read & write
59(68.6)
27(31.4)
0.9(0.5–1.7)
 
Youth’s sub-city
    
Darge
122(69.3)
54(30.7)
1
 
Bakanisa Kesso
82(65.6)
43(34.4)
0.8(0.5–1.4)
 
Chalalaki
58(70.7)
24(29.3)
1.1(0.6–1.9)
 
Burka Jato
35(64.8)
19(35.2)
0.8(0.4–1.5)
 
Local job creation deficit of municipal
    
No
55(55.0)
45(45.0)
1
1
Yes
242(71.8)
95(28.2)
2.1(1.3–3.3)
2.0(1.1–3.8)*
Perceived population pressure
    
No
138(64.8)
75(35.2)
1
 
Yes
159(71.0)
65(29.0)
1.3(0.8–1.8)
 
Local government limit to attract investment
    
No
52(60.5)
34(39.5)
1
 
Yes
245(69.8)
106(30.2)
1.5(0.9–2.5)
 
Perceived Psychological risk factors
Psychological emotional strain in job-seeking behavior
    
No
78(54.5)
65(45.5)
1
1
Yes
219(74.5)
75(25.5)
2.4(1.6–3.7)
2.3(1.3–4.1)*
Job aspiration
    
Any available job
117(67.6)
56(32.4)
1
 
Public job
180(68.2)
84(31.8)
1.0(0.6–1.7)
 
Perceived Socioeconomic factors
Exposure to market information
    
Yes
26(50.0)
26(50.0)
1
1
No
271(70.4)
114(29.6)
2.4(1.3–4.2)
2.0(0.9–4.2)
Mismatch between acquired skills and labor market demands
    
No
41(43.6)
53(56.4)
1
1
Yes
256(74.6)
87(25.4)
3.58(2.4–6.1)
3.2(1.7-6.0)**
Prior work history
    
Yes
115(67.6)
55(32.4)
1
1
No
182(68.2)
85(31.8)
1.0(0.7–1.5)
 
Medium of job search
    
Media
23(46.0)
27(54.0)
1
1
Board
160(71.4)
64(28.6)
2.9(1.6–5.5)
3.2(1.4–7.5)*
Friends
114(69.9)
49(30.1)
2.7(1.4–5.2)
2.6(1.1–6.1)*
job-search habits
    
Yes
118(67.4)
57(32.6)
1
 
No
179(68.3)
83(31.7)
1.0(0.7–1.6)
 
Sector-based job vacancy disparities
    
No
78(54.5)
65(45.5)
1
1
Yes
219(74.5)
75(25.5)
4.3(2.7–6.7)
5.1(2.8–9.2)**
Socio-economic hardships like reduced living standard
    
No
119(67/2)
58932.8)
1
 
Yes
178(68.5)
82(31.5)
1.1(0.7–1.6)
 
Deficiencies in entrepreneurial competencies of youth
    
No
54(47.8)
59(52.2)
1
1
Yes
243(75.0)
81(25.0)
3.3(2.1–5.1)
5.4(1.5–9.7)*
Financial risk factors
Access to financial credit
    
Yes
40(41.7)
56(58.3)
1
1
No
257(75.4)
84(24.6)
4.3(2.7–6.9)
5.3(2.8–9.8)**
Household income level
    
High
54(51.4)
51(48.6)
1
1
Low
243(73.2)
89(26.8)
2.6(1.6–4.1)
1.6(0.9-3.0)
NB: 1 = Reference category. **significant at p < 0.01 *significant at p < 0.05. AOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio; UOR = Crude Odds Ratio. aAdjusted risk of the following independent variables: Gender of urban youth, age of urban youth (in year), security-Induced rural youth migration, local job creation deficit of municipal, population pressure contribute to unemployment, psychological emotional strain affects job-seeking behavior, mismatch between acquired skills and labor market demands, medium of job search, sector-based job vacancy disparities, deficiencies in entrepreneurial competencies of youth; access to financial credit and household income level. bOthers: single/widowed/widow/divorced/
A model adjusted for thirteen confounding factors (Table 3) were: Gender of urban youth, age of urban youth (in year), youth background by geographic origin, insecurity-induced rural out youth migration; local job creation deficit of municipal, population pressure, psychological emotional strain affecting job-seeking behavior; mismatch between acquired skills and labor market demands, medium of job search, sector-based job vacancy variations, deficiencies in entrepreneurial competencies of youth, access to financial credit and household income level. Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) for perceived demographic, structural and institutional, psychological, socio-economic, and financial features associated with risk of urban youth unemployment in the city were, therefore, presented as below.
Demographic risk factors. After adjustment for confounding factors (Table 3) the results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that among the diverse demographic factors, the gender of female urban youth were 4.19 times more likely to be at risk of unemployment than the employed group compared to their male counterparts (AOR = 4.19; 95% CI: 2.2–7.7, p < 0.05), and this difference was statistically significant. The log odds of not unemployed were significantly lower among males than their female counterparts (Table 3). Holding other variables constant, urban youth aged 19 years or younger were found to be 2.19 times more likelihood of being unemployed (AOR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.2–3.9, p < 0.05) compared to those who aged 21 years or older. Among other demographic determinants youths who were self-reported insecurity induced rural-out migration as a contributor to unemployment were 1.86 times more likely to be unemployed than those who did not (AOR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.0–3.2; p = 0.05), even after adjusting for other factors. This implies a statistically significant association between youth migration due to conflict and increased unemployment risk among urban youth.
Structural/Institutional risk factors. From all structural/ institutional dynamics examined, local job creation deficit by municipal authorities (AOR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1–3.8, p < 0.05) was reported to be the only factor with statistically significant association to urban youth unemployment than their counterparts who replied no to the local job creation problem by municipal authorities. Youth who cited local job creation deficit by municipal were twice higher log odds of risk of being unemployed than reference group who replied no to job deficits.
Perceived psychological risk factors. Young urban people who indicated facing psychological emotional strain as a contributor of job-seeking behavior were found to have a 2.36 times (AOR 2.36; 95% CI: 1.3–4.1, p = 0.001) higher likelihood of being unemployed compared to those who did not feel any such effects. This influences job searches intensity, interview performance and willingness to accept certain job in the study area.
Perceived Socioeconomic risk factors. Holding other factors constant, a mismatch between acquired skills and labor market demands and youth unemployment (AOR 3.22; 95% CI: 1.7-6.0, p < 0.001) and the association was statistically significant. Youths who perceived mismatch were 3.22 times more likely to be unemployed than their counterparts who did not think a mismatch between professional skills and job market needs as a factor. Urban youth who reported advertising boards (AOR = 3.29; 95% CI 1.4–7.5, p < 0.01) and friends (personal networks) (AOR = 2.63; 95% CI 1.1–6.1, p < 0.01) as a medium for job search, respectively tended not to be employed compared to their counterparts who utilized media (newspapers, radio, television, and websites) to search for job. In a multivariate analysis, urban youth who felt variation in sector-based job vacancy announcements based on their field of study (AOR 5.18; 95% CI: 2.8–9.2, p < 0.001) reported higher log odds of an unemployment risk 5.18 times greater than individuals who felt no vacancy difference. Likewise, respondents who self-reported deficiencies in entrepreneurial competencies (AOR 5.34; 95% CI 2.8–9.8, p < 0.05) were 5.34 times more likely to be unemployed than their counterpart group who thought no such difference in competencies among youth.
Among financial risk factors, young individuals who reportedly lacked access to financial credit resources were almost 5.34 times (AOR 5.34; 95% CI 2.8–9.8, p < 0.05) more likely to be unemployed than those who had an access to credit sources. Finally, although the odds ratio was higher and suggested a potential association (AOR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.1–1.3; p < 0.05), household income level did not show statistical significant impact on urban youth unemployment. Table 3.
Goodness of fit of the model
The-2 log likelihood statistic was 626.809. The statistic for the model that had only an intercept was-2LLo = 430.270. The inclusion of the parameters reduced the-2 log likelihood statistic by 216.157, which is reflected in the model chi-square for the omnibus test and the p < 0.05. Therefore, an omnibus test revealed the fit is adequate. This means that at least one of the predictors are significantly related to the response variable, urban youth employment. The Nagelkerke R2 was 52.01%, showing the exposure variable was useful in predicting urban youth’s risk of unemployment in the Nekemte City. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit test statistic was not significant in this study, p = 0.809 > 0.05, telling that the model fits the data well. Multicollinearity in the final model was checked by assessing the standard error for the coefficients. Standard errors larger than 2.0 implies problems of multicollinearity among the exposure variables(Pallant, 2020). With regard to this research, the values were less than 2.0 and this shows the absence of multicollinearity in the developed model(Lemeshow and Hosmer, 2000).
Discussion
This study aimed at identifying the risk factors associated with urban youth unemployment in Nekemete City, East Wollega, Oromia. In this study area, a substantial proportion of respondents (68.0%) self-reported lack of any employment opportunities. The prevalence rate of the study aligns with the International Labor Organization’s classification of youth unemployment (International Labour Organization, 2025) and studies conducted in Wolayita Sodo Town and Eastern Hararghe Chiro Town in Ethiopia (Abdurahman and Ahmed, 2021; Tegegne, 2019). In Nekemte City, according to the study’s empirical analyses, there were independent predictor variables that were associated with urban youth’ unemployment. These underlying risk factors at this micro level study were gender of urban youth, age of urban youth (in year), insecurity-induced rural youth-out migration, local job creation deficit by municipal authorities, psychological emotional strain affecting job-seeking behavior, mismatch between acquired skills and labor market demands, medium of job search, sector-based job vacancy disparities, deficiencies in entrepreneurial competencies and access to financial credit were significant and characterizing demographic, structural/institutional, psychological, socio-economic and financial gaps that disproportionately influencing urban youth enrolment into the formal job market(seeTable 3).
After adjusting for all variables, female youth were found to be 4.1 times more likely to unemployed versus male counterparts. Gender unemployment disparities have long been a focal point in empirical urban youth studies. This result aligns with findings from an empirical study conducted in selected urban areas of Ethiopia that employed multilevel modeling which showed that female youth were 3.9 times more likely to be unemployed compared to their male counterparts(Teshita, 2018). Likewise a study by World Bank (2022) also complements that female youth were more likely to be unemployed than male youth in low-income countries like sub-Saharan Africa where female respondents unemployment rate was consistently higher due to limited access to education, social norms, and childcare responsibilities(The World Bank., 2022).
Holding other variables constant, the findings of this study also showed that individual urban youth aged 19 years or younger were 2.19 times more likelihoods to experience unemployment risk compared to the reference group aged 20 years or older. Corroborating this finding, sources from Ethiopia and other low and middle income countries(LMICs) show that urban youth aged 19 years or younger, particularly those without prior work experience, experienced disproportionately high rates of unemployment versus counterparts who had prior work experience(Haile, 2003; Haile, 2008; Ralph and Arora, 2023; Siddiqa, 2021)
Urban youth who reported security-induced rural-out youth migration as a contributor for unemployment was nearly 2.0 times more likely unemployed compared to their counterparts who did not feel personal insecurity problem, after controlling for selected covariates. In line with this finding several empirical and meta data analyses highlighted that urban migration often activated by rural violence had overwhelmed urban labor markets. Hence, perceived rural insecurity and instability pushed a massive number of youth to urban center and were a risk factor for urban unemployment among youth (Duresso and Gebreegziabher, 2020; Horn Review, 2025; Ronzon et al., 2025; Shuker and Sadik, 2024).
In this study, after adjusting for covariates, municipal job creation deficit was sufficiently aligned with urban youth unemployment problem. Participants who self-reported local job creation deficit by municipal authorities were higher log odds of risk of unemployment than their counterparts who thought no such deficit. For instance, studies have found that the youth who perceived weak municipal job creation efforts had significantly longer unemployment durations(De Lannoy et al., 2018; Debele, 2020; Doran and Fingleton, 2016; Mishra and Mishra, 2022; Pradhan et .al., 2022; Sharma, 2022) and multiple sources including (Abdurahman and Ahmed, 2021; Berhe, 2021; Shita et al., 2025) also corroborate this insight.
A
The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of unemployment among youth who experienced psychological emotional strain during their job-seeking were higher and they remain significantly disadvantaged compared to their counterparts who did not face such challenges. This implies a critical association between psychological well-being and access to support systems during job-seeking journey among urban youth(Fawcett, 2002; Mokona et al., 2020; Pereira., 2021). In line with this study, multiple empirical studies documented youth who perceived psychological strain had remarkably higher log odds of being unemployed with poor counseling, and inadequate psychosocial support(MacDonald, 2025; Mlatsheni and Rospabe, 2002; Yang et al., 2024). Corroborating these work, studies from Ethiopia also cited that these barriers disproportionately affect distressed young people leaving them navigating the job market with minimal guidance, compounding their disadvantage and perpetuating cycles of unemployment(Berhe, 2021; Mokona et al., 2020; Nurgi, 2020).
In western Ethiopia, unemployment among urban youth was statistically significantly associated with perceived skill mismatch. The study found the log odds of urban youth who thought a mismatch between their acquired skills and labor market demands were over three times more likely to be unemployed than those who perceived otherwise, corroborating the findings with empirical evidence both within Ethiopia (Gebrekidan, 2018; Mekonnen and Jaeun, 2021) and outside(Cvetkoska et al., 2025). Therefore, to fill this vacuum, education and training programs must be better associated with real labor market needs(Mulu et al., 2022; Ondo, 2017). Strengthening vocational education, expanding industry partnerships, and offering targeted career guidance be able to help equip urban youth with appropriate skills finally improving their employment prospects and reducing urban unemployment rate(Guta et al., 2025).
Furthermore, this study revealed that urban youth who perceived sector-based job vacancy variations were much more likely to be unemployed than those who did not feel variation in urban job vacancies compared to the reference group. This this finding was broadly consistent with several studies(Guta et al., 2025; International Labour Office, 2018; MacDonald and Shildrick, 2007). This finding underlines the need for more equitable job vacancy dissemination across sectors(Debele, 2020). Addressing these disparities through inclusive labor market policies and targeted job matching platforms can help reduce perceived exclusion and improve employment outcomes for urban youth(Gebretsadik, 2016)
After adjusting for all variables, among socio-economic risk factors urban youth who felt deficiencies in entrepreneurial competencies were found to be much more exposure to unemployment over five times more likely than their peer groups who did not reflect such gaps. This implies how crucial entrepreneurial competencies were in helping young people navigate their journey to job market. The finding aligns with broader evidence from Ethiopia and across sub-Saharan Africa, where limited access to skill training and support continues to hold back youth employment potential(Gebretsadik, 2016; Gupte and Barnett, 2014; Guta et al., 2025; Mekonnen, and Jaeun, 2021; Pradhan, 2022; Siddiqa, 2021).
Furthermore, this study revealed that the log odds of urban youths who reported limited access to financial credit was significantly associated with adherence to risk of unemployment than their counter groups who replied no access problem by 30% higher rate. This finding was consistent with meta-analysis and other studies in Ethiopia that highlighted limited access to financial credit significantly increased the likelihood of youth unemployment(Guta et al., 2025; Menta and Leza, 2020; Teshita, 2018; Wakgari, 2019). The result reflects the need for all-encompassing financial systems that prioritizes youth’s access to credit(Haji et al., 2020). Similar studies in LMICs documented expanding microfinance programs and making ease collateral requirements,(Gupte and Barnett, 2014; Guta et al., 2025; Msigwa and Kipesha, 2013; The World Bank, 2022) and other sources also reported integrating financial literacy into youth cited development creativities could allow young people to form their own employment opportunities for themselves and reduce urban job loss(Akinbola, 2024; Munyao, 2014; Siddiqa, 2021). Finally, though the log odds of household income level were higher it was not significantly associated with urban youth unemployment. While access to credit plays a more decisive role studies highlighted that credit constraints not income alone were key barriers to youth employment and entrepreneurship(Getye and Gutu, 2021; Tegebu and Seid, 2023).
Limitations of the Study This study basically relied on self-reported data, which might be affected by recall bias which believed to be potentially distorting unemployment status and risk factors. Structural/nstitutional factors such as municipal governance and labor policy enforcement were also not deeply addressed. Then, the geographic focus on Nekemte City might diminish generalizability to the other urban centers contexts. Lastly, psychological emotional strains were studied without standardized tools, affecting reliability.
Conclusion
Many underlying demographic, socio-economic, psychological, structural/institutional, and financial factors were the significant predictors of urban youth’s unemployment. This survey found significant predictors contribute significantly to the final model and influencing urban youth unemployment in Nekemte City: Gender of youth, age of youth, insecurity-induced rural out youth migration, local job creation deficit of municipal, psychological emotional strain, mismatch between acquired skills and labor market demands, sector-based vacancy disparities, deficiencies in entrepreneurial competencies among youth, and access to financial credit. These set of risk factors reveal overlapping financial, socio-economic, structural/institutional, psychological, and demographic hurdles that strongly affect urban youth entry into formal labor market. The findings emphasize the serious need for integrated program interventions that address demographic, psychological, structural/institutional, socio-economic and individual characteristics influencing urban youth unemployment problems. The study explored the multifaceted nature of urban youth unemployment and recommends comprehensive program interventions which include giving priority for female youth, young youth (19 years or younger), addressing rural insecurity that pushes youths to urban centers, improving access to credit facilities, aligning education with labor market needs, building entrepreneurial competencies and enhancing psychological support services and participation in job creation programs strengthening the capacity of municipal authorities were essential for creating sustainable job opportunities.
Funding Declaration
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Clinical Trial Number: Clinical trial number: Not applicable
Declaration of competing interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
A
Data Availability
The data used in this research is available upon request.
Déclarations section
Ethics statement and accordance
A
A
A
The research protocol was reviewed and approved by committee members [Dr. Girmaye Kenasa, Dr. Dereje Chala, Dr. Tolera Megersa, Dr. Mezene Woyesa and Mr Alemayehu Lema/ the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Wollega University/Ref/No.WU/REC/799/Dec 2, 2024) in accordance with the ethical guidelines and regulations of the Ethiopian National Research Ethics Review Guideline. Permission was received from Nekemte City Youth Office. The purpose of the study was explained to all participants and a consent form approved by the Review Board was given to participants.
A
The principal investigator emphasized that participation was completely voluntary and that they had the right to withdraw any time during the interview without giving any reason. Confidentiality and anonymity were explained to all participants.
Consent to participate:
A
Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. For participants under the age of 18, consent was obtained from a parent or legal guardian.
Consent to publish:
Not applicable
A
Acknowledgement
Would like to extend my gratitude to Wollega University for their invaluable support, ethical clearance and permission to conduct this study. I am especially grateful to Mr. Alemu Gurmessa, Chair of the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, for his exceptional assistance. My sincere thanks also go to Mr. Belay Aboma, Head of the Western Region Statistical Office of Ethiopia, for providing essential support. I would like to extend my thanks to Nekemte Town Youth Office and sub-city administrations for cooperation to conduct the study and providing information. The authors are also very grateful to the data collectors, supervisors, and youths who actively participated in this study.
A
Author Contribution
The author was responsible for the conception and design of the study, data collection and analysis, interpretation of the findings, and drafting of the manuscript. The author critically reviewed and approved the final version for submission
Reference
Abdurahman M, Ahmed A. Demographic and Socio-economic Determinants of Urban Youth Unemployment in West Hararghe Zone, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. Horn Afr J Bus Econ. 2021;4(2):18–41. http://journals.ju.edu.et18.
Abebe G. Urban youth unemployment in Eastern and Southern Africa: Features, challenges, consequences, and cutback strategies. In P. B. M. & T. E. Mukuna, editor, Urban youth unemployment in Eastern and Southern Africa. Organisation for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa (OSSREA). pp. 65–100, (2015).
Akinbola TM. Impact of Youth Unemployment on Economic Growth in Nigeria: A Review Paper. Afr J Econ Sustainable Dev. 2024;7(3):131–44.
https://doi.org/10.52589/
.
Berg B. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 7th ed. Allyn and Bacon; 2009.
Berhe MW. Empirical analysis of urban youth unemployment in Ethiopia. Afr Dev Rev. 2021;33(1):104–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12514.
A
Beyene B, Mekonnen B, Gebrekidan TT. The state, determinants, and consequences of skills mismatch in the Ethiopian labour market (Working Paper No. 21). Policy Studies Institute. (2018), Retrieved from https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/etdwpaper/021
A
Broussard NH, andTekleselassie TG. Youth unemployment: Ethiopia country study (IGC Working Paper No. 12/0592). International Growth Centre. (2012). Retrieved from https://prime-ethiopia.org/
Caribbean Development Bank. The changing nature of poverty and inequality in the Caribbean: New issues, new solutions. Caribbean Development Bank.. (2016). Retrieved fromhttps://www.caribank.org./
Cvetkoska V, Trpeski P, Ivanovski I, Peovski F, İmrol MH, Babadoğan B, Ecer H, Görür DZ, Selvi U, Hunde AB, Gemeda FT, Dubi YB, Melnyk S, Lytvynchuk A, Tereshchenko H. Comparative Analysis of Skill Shortages, Skill Mismatches, and the Threats of Migration in Labor Markets: A Sectoral Approach in North Macedonia, Türkiye, Ethiopia, and Ukraine. Social Sci. 2025;14(5):1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14050294.
De Lannoy A, Graham L, Patel L, Leibbrandt M. (2018). What Drives Youth Unemployment and What Interventions Help: A Systematic Overview of the Evidence. Executive Summary. Retrieved from https://redi3x3.org/.Accessed 16 October 2025.
Debele T. Urban Unemployment Patterns: Challenges, Coping Mechanisms and Self Employment Trends in Ethiopian Urban Centers. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2020;8(2):1–28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20200802.12.
Doran J, Fingleton B. Employment Resilience in Europe and the 2008 Economic Crisis: Insights from Micro-Level Data. Reg Stud. 2016;50(4):644–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1088642.
Duguma AL. Determinants of Urban Youth Unemployment: Evidence from Guder Town, Western Shoa Zone, Ethiopia. Res Humanit Social Sci. 2019;9(17):68–73. https://doi.org/10.7176/rhss/9-17-07.
Duresso A, Gebreegziabher D. Youth unemployment and its effects on personal security of local community in Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia: The case of Dambi Dollo Town (Master’s thesis, Addis Ababa University, Institute for Peace and Security Studies). (2020) Retrieved from https://etd.aau.edu.et/bit
Ethiopian Ministry of Labor and Skills. National Youth Development and Change Strategy (2017–2025). Addis Ababa: Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia.. (2017) Retrieved from https://www.younglives-ethiopia.org/
Ethiopian Statistics Service. Statistical report on the 2020 second round urban employment-unemployment survey. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.. (2022) Retrieved from https://ess.gov.et/
Fawcett C. Latin American youth in transition: A policy paper on youth unemployment in Latin America and the Caribbean (Policy Brief Series, Sustainable Development Department, Social Development Division). Inter-American Development Bank. (2002) Retrieved from https://www.youthpolicy.org/
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Plan of action for job creation 2020–2025: Sustainable jobs for all. Jobs Creation Commission. Addis Ababa: Government of Ethiopia.. (2020) Retrieved from https://fsdethiopia.org/
Fung YV, Nga LHJ. An Investigation of Economic Growth, Youth Unemployment and Inflation In ASEAN Countries. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i1/12023
Gebretsadik D, Shiferaw T. The cause of educated youth unemployment and its socioeconomic effect in Addis Ababa (Master’s thesis, Addis Ababa University, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies). (2016). Retrieved from https://etd.aau.edu.et/
Getye D, Gutu Z. Does use of credit improve welfare outcomes of households? The empirical case study in Ethiopia (Master’s thesis, Addis Ababa University, School of Commerce, Department of Development Economics). (2021). Retrieved from https://etd.aau.edu.et/
Gupte J, Barnett I. Understanding Urban Youth’ and the Challenges they face in Sub-Saharan Africa: Unemployment, Food Insecurity and Violent Crime(IDS Evidence Report No. 81). Institute of Development Studies. (2014) Retrieved from https://www.ids.ac.uk/
Guta MD, Gebre-egziabher KA, Kassahun M. The ramifications of youth unemployment in the Gurage Zone, Central Ethiopia (economic, social, and political). Discover Global Society, 3(108) (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00250-0
Habiyaremye A, Habanabakize T, Nwosu C. Bridging the labour market skills gap to tackle youth unemployment in South Africa. Econ Labour Relat Rev. 2022;33(4):786–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/10353046221138400.
Haile GA. Determinants of self-employment in urban Ethiopia: Panel data based evidence (PSI Discussion Paper Series No. 1). Policy Studies Institute. (2008) Retrieved from https://conference.iza.org/
Haile GA. The incidence of youth unemployment in urban Ethiopia. Paper presented at the 2nd EAF International Symposium on Contemporary Development Issues in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. (2003). Retrieved from https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk//
Haji HF, Brhane H, Wodajo M. Determinants of youth unemployment: The case of Dedo Woreda, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia (Master’s thesis, Jimma University, College of Business and Economics, Department of Management). (2020). Retrieved from https://repository.ju.edu.et/handle/123456789/423
Horn Review. (2025). Youth, unemployment and extremism: The silent security threat in Ethiopia. Horn Review,. Available at: https://hornreview.org/. Accessed 30 July 2025.
Hosmer DW and., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471722146.
A
Hove M, Muchemwa ETN. The Urban Crisis in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Threat to Human Security and Sustainable Development. Stability. 2013;2(1):1–14.
ILO. (2024). Global Employment Trends for Youth 2024: Sub-Saharan Africa (ILO). Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/media/584131/. Accessed 25 June 2025.
Ministry of Trad and Industry. (2019). National Entrepreneurship Strategy of Ethiopia 2020–2025. Addis Ababa: Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Retrieved from https://www.policyvault.africa/. Accessed 28 June 2025.
International Labour Office. (2018). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2018. International Labour Office–Geneva: ILO. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/. Accessed August 20 2025.
International Labour Organization. (2019). ILOSTAT: Statistics on youth. Geneva: ILO. Retrieved from https://ilostat.ilo.org/. https://www.ilo.org/. Accessed 20 August 2025.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2025). Youth Labour Market Statistics (YouthSTATS database). Retrieved from https://ilostat.ilo.org/. https://ilostat.ilo.org/. Accessed 21August 2025.
Jubane M. (2021). trategies for reducing youth unemployment in South Africa. Proceedings of the World Conference on Children and Youth. 01–11. https://doi.org/10.17501/26731037.2020.2101
Kassa AF. Unemployment in urban Ethiopia: Determinants and impact on household welfare. Thiopian J Econ. 2012;21(2):127–57. https://doi.org/https://.
Kelly L, Martinez JC. (2018). Can Ethiopia Create Two Million Jobs Every Year. https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/. Accessed 24 August 2025.
Kelsey J, Whittemore A, Evans A, Thompson W. Methods of sampling and estimation of sample size. Methods in observational epidemiology. (2. Oxford University Press; 1996.
Kibru M. (2012). Employment Challenges in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa University press. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/22550386/
Kothari CR. Research Methodology Methods and Techniques (2nd edition, Vol. 17). New Age International(P) Limited, Publishers. (2004).
Lam D, Leibbrandt M. (2014). Youth Bulges and Youth Unemployment in Developing Countries. Paper presented at the 9th IZA/World Bank Conference on Employment and Development, Lima, Peru, June 18–20, 2014. Retrieved from https://conference.iza.org/. Accessed 02 June 2025.
Lebakeng JT, Matebese-Notshulwana K. Demographic youth bulge and unemployment as potential for political violence and insecurity in Africa, with special reference to South Africa. Commonw Youth Dev. 2024;21(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6549/13931.
MacDonald R. Missing Youth: Reflecting on Resistance through Rituals and the sociological study of working-class youth and youth culture since then. Crime Media Culture: Int J. 2025;1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590251359146.
MacDonald R, Shildrick T. Street corner society: Leisure careers, youth (sub)culture and social exclusion. Leisure Stud. 2007;26(3):339–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360600834826.
Mago S. Urban youth unemployment in Africa: Whither socio-economic problems. Mediterranean J Social Sci. 2014;5(9):33–40.
https://doi.org/10.5901/
.
Mastercard Foundation. (2020). Realising aspirations: Youth in Ethiopia through employment. Mastercard Foundation. Retrieved fromhttps://mastercardfoundation.org/. April 20 2025.
Mekonnen MA, Jaeun S. (2021). The causes of youth unemployment among tertiary graduates in Ethiopia Master’s thesis, KDI School of Public Policy and Management). KDI Central Archives. Retrieved from https://archives.kdischool.ac.kr/handle/11125/42557. April 20 2025.
Menta L, Leza T. Determinants of Youth Unemployment: The Case of Areka Town, Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. J Econ Sustainable Dev. 2020;11(17):42–50. https://doi.org/10.7176/jesd/11-17-05.
A
Mishra Kumar M, Mishra P. Determinant of Urban Youth Unemployment in Developing Countries. Neuro Quantology. 2022;20(9).
https://doi.org/10.48047/
.
Mlatsheni C, Rospabe S. (2002). Why is youth unemployment so high and unequally spread in South Africa? (DPRU Working Paper No. 02/65). Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town. Retrieved from https://open.uct.ac.za/
Mokona H, Yohannes K, Ayano G. Youth unemployment and mental health: Prevalence and associated factors of depression among unemployed young adults in Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia. Int J Mental Health Syst. 2020;14(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00395-2.
Msigwa R, Kipesha EF. Determinants of Youth unemployment in Developing Countries: Evidences from Tanzania. J Econ Sustainable Dev. 2013;4(14):67–77.
Mulatu G. Factors Affecting Urban Youth Unemployment in Ethiopia: The Case of Bale-Robe Town. Bale SunText Rev Arts Social Sci. 2022;3(3):1–145. https://doi.org/10.51737/2766-4600.2022.045.
Mulu A, Ajebi G, Hordofa GW, Senbeta YF. (2022). Determinants of Urban Unemployment and Its Consequence in Ethiopia Determinants of Urban Unemployment and Its Consequence. Unpublished manuscript. Accessed 21April 2025.
Munyao BM. The Nature, Challenges and Consequences of Urban Youth Unemployment: A Case of Nairobi City, Kenya. Univers J Educational Res. 2014;2(7):495–503. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020701.
Netherlands Enterprise Agency. (2020). Nexus Skills-Jobs Assessment: Ethiopia. Commissioned by RVO. Retrieved from https://www.rvo.nl/.
Nurgi BG. Youth Unemployment and its impacts; A study in Assela city Administration. Global Scienece J (GSJ). 2020;8(7):2122–34.
OECD. (2018). Engaging and empowering youth in OECD countries: How to bridge the governance gap. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/
Ondo A. Determinants of Youth Unemployment: The Case of EMCCA. Empir Econ Lett. 2017;16(11):1203–12. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2204080107.
Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. 7th ed. Routledge; 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452.
Pereira DJ, Joosub N, Basson P. The Psychological Factors Influencing Moving from Unemployment to Employment in South. Afr J Career Dev. 2021;6(1):118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/ajcd.v6i1.118.
Pieters J, IZA Research Report No. (2013). Youth unemployment in developing countries (. 58). Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). Background report prepared for the European Commission. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izarrs/58.html
Population Reference Bureau. (2017). 2017 World Population Data Sheet: With a special focus on youth. PRB. Available at: https://www.prb.org/. https://www.prb.org/
A
Pradhan P, Sharma U, Mishra G, Dani ST, Varma R. Resilience Of Employed And Unemployed Individuals: A Comparative Study. Int J Creative Res Thoughts (IJCRT). 2022;10(7):964–9.
A
Puente DM, et al. Determinants of youth unemployment in Barranquilla, Colombia: a multi-method analysis of education, work experience, and socioeconomic factors. Int J Adolescence Youth. 2025;30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2025.2492106.
Ralph A, Arora A. A bibliometric study of reference literature on youth unemployment. J Enterprising Communities. 2023;17(6):1338–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-04-2022-0062.
Rana R, Singhal R. Chi-square test and its application in hypothesis testing. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci. 2015;1(1):69–71. https://doi.org/10.4103/2395-5414.157577.
Ronzon T, Gurria P, Carus M, Cingiz K, El-Meligi A, Hark N, Iost S, M’barek R, Philippidis G, van Leeuwen M, Wesseler J, Medina-Lozano I, Grimplet J, Díaz A, Tejedor-Calvo E, Marco P, Fischer M, Creydt M, Sánchez-Hernández E. … Miras Ávalos, J. M. (2025). Youth, unemployment and extremism: The silent security threat in Ethiopia. Horn Review. Sustainability. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28459981
Seatzu F. African Youth Charter. In In Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Right. Edw Elgar Publishing. 2022;700(251):93–6. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903621.
Sharma AN. Youth Employment and Unemployment in India: Issues and Challenges. Indian J Labour Econ. 2022;65(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-022-00387-5.
Shita NG, Mekonnen MA, Tegegne YE, Nigussie MM, Woudneh AF. Predictors of youth unemployment duration and impact evaluation of job creation program in East Gojjam Zone. PLoS ONE. 2025;20(4):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320795.
Shuker A, Sadik HH. A critical review on rural youth unemployment in Ethiopia. Int J Adolescence Youth. 2024;29(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2322564.
Siddiqa A. Determinants of Unemployment in Selected Developing Countries: A Panel Data Analysis. J Economic Impact. 2021;3(1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.52223/jei3012103.
Sin E. Sociology and Criminology-Open Access The Influence and Impact of Youth Cultures. Sociol Criminology-Open Access. 2024;12(1000322):11–2. https://doi.org/10.35248/2375-4435.2.
Suva F. (2015). The Pacific Youth Development Framework 2014–2023: A coordinated approach to youth-centred development in the Pacific. Social Development Division, SPC, Retrieved from https://www.spc.int/
Tegegne T. Socioeconomic Determinants of Youth Unemployment in Ethiopia, the Case of Wolaita Sodo Town, Southern Ethiopia. Developing Ctry Stud. 2019;9(10):38–45. https://doi.org/10.7176/dcs/9-10-05.
Teshita UC. Multilevel Modelling of Determinants of Youth Unemployment in Urban Ethiopia: Bayesian Estimation Approach. Int J Data Sci Technol. 2018;4(2):67–78. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdst.20180402.15.
The UN-Habitat. (2025). Urban Youth Fund E-Learning Program. UN-Habitat. Retrieved 24 September, 2025 from. https://unhabitat.org/
The World Bank. (2022). Youth unemployment in low-income countries. The Global Economy. Retrieved from https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/.
UNICEF UK. (1992). A summary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. UNICEF United Kingdom. Retrieved 27 July 2025 from https://downloads.unicef.org.uk
United Nations. (2019). World youth report: Addressing the complex challenges facing young people today. United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/
United Nations Population Fund. (2023). Unemployment and development in Ethiopia: Policy Brief. UNFPA Ethiopia. Retrieved from https://ethiopia.unfpa.org/
Wakgari H. (2019). Youth unemployment in Ethiopia: Demographic and policy perspectives. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved 20 July 2019 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3576363
A
Wieser C, Mesfin W. (2021). Employment in urban and rural Ethiopia (Report No. AUS0002202). Poverty and Equity Global Practice, World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/
World Bank Group. (2025). Youth Employment Programs: An Evaluation of World Bank and IFC Support. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org//
Yang Y, Niu L, Amin S, Yasin I. Unemployment and mental health: A global study of unemployment’s influence on diverse mental disorders. Front Public Health. 2024;12(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1440403.
Zhang X, Tezera D, Zou C, Wang Z, Zhao J, Gebremenfas E, Dhavle J. (2018). Industrial park development in Ethiopia: Case study report (Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development Working Paper Series No. 21/2018, pp. 1–85). United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). Retrieved on May 13 2025 from https://ipp.unido.org/
Total words in MS: 7021
Total words in Title: 19
Total words in Abstract: 446
Total Keyword count: 8
Total Images in MS: 3
Total Tables in MS: 3
Total Reference count: 88