A Five-Year Retrospective Study of Patient Falls in a Tertiary Hospital: Monitoring, Causes, and Impact on Patient Safety and Quality of Care
HaticeESEN1
NazifeÖZTÜRK1✉Emailnazifeozturk83@gmail.com
1Research and Development DepartmentAntalya Training and Research HospitalAntalyaTürkiye
2Research Development DepartmentAntalya Training and Research HospitalAntalyaTürkiye
Hatice ESEN KOÇ, Nazife ÖZTÜRK*
*Correspondance: Nazife Öztürk, nazifeozturk83@gmail.com
1. Research and Development Department, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye
2. Research and Development Department, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye
A
Abstract
Background
Falls in hospitalized patients are among the most common preventable adverse events and pose a major threat to patient safety. Despite preventive protocols, falls remain frequent and are associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and higher healthcare costs. Understanding the frequency, characteristics, and root causes of falls is essential to improve patient safety strategies.
Aim
This study aimed to examine the frequency and characteristics of inpatient falls over a five-year period and to identify their underlying causes through root cause analysis.
Methods
A retrospective descriptive study was conducted using hospital adverse event notification records between 2020 and 2024. A total of 211 fall incidents were identified and analyzed in terms of demographic characteristics, clinical settings, fall locations, risk scores, and root causes. The Itaki Fall Risk Scale was used to assess patient risk levels, and contributing factors were categorized into patient-related, caregiver-related, equipment-related, environmental, staff-related, and procedural causes.
Results
Among the 211 reported falls, the mean patient age was 50.4 ± 29.3 years, and most cases involved male patients (62.6%). The highest fall incidence was observed in 2024 (n = 78), indicating an increasing trend across the years. The majority of patients (92.4%) were classified as high risk according to the Itaki Fall Risk Scale. Most falls occurred in patient rooms (71.1%), followed by procedure/examination rooms (14.7%) and bathrooms/toilets (11.8%). Root cause analysis revealed that falls were primarily patient-related (59.7%), followed by caregiver-, equipment-, environmental-, staff-, and procedure-related factors.
Conclusion
Patient falls remain a significant safety concern in hospitals, with most cases occurring among high-risk patients and being preventable. Root cause analysis highlights the multifactorial nature of falls, emphasizing the need for comprehensive preventive strategies that address patient behavior, caregiver awareness, environmental safety, and staff compliance with protocols. Strengthening fall prevention programs is crucial to improving patient safety and reducing healthcare costs.
Key words:
Falls in hospitals
patient falls
patient safety
root and cause analysis
Highlights
- This study presents a five-year root cause analysis of inpatient falls in a tertiary training and research hospital.
- The majority of falls occurred among high-risk patients aged 65–80 years and in male patients, with most events reported in patient rooms.
- Patient-related factors, including cognitive impairment, polypharmacy, and lack of compliance with preventive measures, were identified as the primary causes of falls.
- Despite preventive protocols, underreporting and insufficient patient/caregiver engagement remain critical challenges in fall prevention.
- Findings emphasize the importance of systematic risk assessment, patient and caregiver education, and evidence-based fall prevention strategies to strengthen patient safety culture.
Introduction
Hospitals serve as the cornerstone of healthcare institutions, playing a central role in the health ecosystem by providing uninterrupted healthcare services [1]. Ensuring patient safety is the foremost priority for achieving high-quality, effective, and safe patient care [2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines patient safety as the absence of preventable harm to a patient during the process of healthcare [3]. Patient safety has become the most important priority for hospitals, with efforts directed toward establishing safer care environments where major complications are reduced [4]. Consequently, quality improvement practices and patient safety initiatives have emerged as fundamental goals of hospital management, making the implementation of specific preventive measures essential to achieving these objectives [1].
Hospital falls are among the most common and preventable patient safety incidents worldwide. A fall is defined as an unintentional descent to a lower level, regardless of whether an injury occurs [5][6][7][8]. Falls represent a major global safety concern. The WHO reports that approximately 37.3 million falls each year require medical attention, and around 684,000 people die annually due to falls [9][10][11]. Notably, the incidence of falls increases with age, with one in three adults aged 65 years and older experiencing at least one fall annually [12] [13]. Furthermore, approximately 600,000 fall-related deaths occur worldwide each year, making falls one of the leading causes of traumatic mortality [14]. Falls are also recognized as a leading cause of preventable injuries [15]. To reduce this risk, the WHO recommends creating safer environments, enhancing community education, increasing fall-related research, and developing appropriate prevention policies [11].
The causes of hospital falls are multifactorial, involving patient characteristics, caregivers, environmental factors, medications, and deficiencies in care processes, all of which can contribute to an increased risk [7][16]. Therefore, the use of risk assessment tools, the development of preventive protocols, and the implementation of root cause analyses are essential strategies to improve patient safety in clinical settings [17] [18] [19] [20] [21].
A
Nurses play a central role in fall-prevention strategies, and effective nursing practices have been shown to directly reduce the incidence of falls [
22] [
23][
18] [
15] [
24] [
25]. Most research to date has focused on identifying fall risks within the framework of global imperatives for prevention and management; however, interventions and preventive strategies for falls have not yet provided a universally accepted gold standard [
26]. In this context, identifying the frequency, causes, and risk factors of hospital falls is essential to guide the development of effective fall-prevention programs. This study aimed to examine the frequency and characteristics of inpatient falls over a five-year period and to identify their underlying causes through root cause analysis.
Methods
Study Design
This research was conducted as a descriptive study using retrospective data.
Setting and Sample
The study was carried out in a tertiary-level training and research hospital located in Antalya, Türkiye.
Fall Risk Assessment Tools
Identifying potential risk factors that may lead to patient falls during hospitalization is of critical importance [12]. According to the Turkish Ministry of Health’s Healthcare Quality Standards (HQS), risk assessments must be performed, fall incidents should be monitored, preventive measures should be implemented at patient, ward, and hospital levels, and outcomes should be followed using quality indicators [27], [28]. Within this framework, the Itaki Fall Risk Scale is used for adult patients, while the Harizmi Fall Risk Scale is applied to pediatric patients. The Itaki Fall Risk Scale evaluates 19 risk factors categorized as major or minor, and classifies patients into two groups: low risk and high risk [27][29]. In this study, the risk levels derived from the Itaki Scale (low vs. high) were used for analysis.
Data Collection
Data were retrospectively obtained from patient records covering the years 2020–2024. Information was collected using the “Patient Fall Data Collection Form” and the “Patient Fall Data Analysis Form,” which are implemented under the HQS framework of the Ministry of Health. Over the five-year period, data from 211 inpatients who experienced a fall during hospitalization were included in the study.
Patient Fall Data Collection Form: includes patient name, age, gender, diagnosis, clinical unit, fall location, fall risk score, cause of fall, and pre-/post-fall patient status.
Patient Fall Data Analysis Form: a mandatory hospital reporting tool completed monthly, which documents the number of hospitalized patients, number of falls, fall rates, locations of falls, and distribution of risk scores. The fall rate was calculated using the following formula defined by the Ministry of Health [30]:
Total number of inpatients + carried-
over patients + outpatient visitsNumber of patient falls
Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics version 22. Descriptive statistics included means, standard deviations, and frequency distributions. Group differences were examined using Chi-square tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Ethical Considerations
This study was approved by Antalya Traning and Research Hospital Ethics Committee (Approval No: 2025/188, dated 19.06.2025) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study used retrospective, anonymized patient safety data. No direct patient contact was involved. The requirement for individual informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee.
Limitations
This study was conducted in a single center, which limits the generalizability of the findings to the national level.
Findings
During the five-year study period, a total of 211 inpatient falls were reported as adverse events. The lowest number of falls was observed in 2021 (n = 22), while the highest was recorded in 2024 (n = 78), indicating an upward trend over the years (Fig. 1).
During the five-year study period, a total of 211 inpatient falls were reported as adverse events. The lowest number of falls was observed in 2021 (n = 22), while the highest was recorded in 2024 (n = 78), indicating an upward trend over the years (Fig. 1).
The mean age of patients who experienced a fall was 50.43 ± 29.27 years, with the majority being male (62.6%). Falls were most frequently observed among patients in the 36–80 years age group (60.6%). The highest proportion of falls occurred in internal medicine clinics (43.1%), and according to the Itaki Fall Risk Scale, 92.4% of patients were classified as being at high risk for falls.
In terms of fall locations, the majority occurred in patient rooms (71.1%), followed by procedure/examination rooms (14.7%) and bathrooms/toilets (11.8%). The overall inpatient fall rate across the years was approximately 0.01%.
Root cause evaluation indicated that most falls (59.7%) were due to patient-related factors. Following the incidents, the majority of patients did not require additional diagnostic investigations (Table 1).
Table 1
Characteristics of Patients Who Experienced Falls (n = 211)
Variables | Mean ± SD/ n (%) | | Min-Max |
|---|
Age | 50,43 ± 29,269 | 0–98 |
| | | n (211) | % |
Gender | Female | 79 | 37,4 |
| | Male | 132 | 62,6 |
Age | < 5 | 46 | 21,8 |
| | 6–17 | 3 | 1,4 |
| | 18–35 | 10 | 4,7 |
| | 36–64 | 64 | 30,3 |
| | 65–80 | 64 | 30,3 |
| | > 81 | 24 | 11,4 |
Klinik | Emergency | 54 | 25,6 |
| | Surgical Clinics | 24 | 11,4 |
| | Internal Medicine Clinics | 91 | 43,1 |
| | Other | 2 | 0,9 |
| | Pediatric Clinics | 40 | 19 |
Location of Fall | Clinic/Patient Room | 150 | 71,1 |
Examination/ Intervention Room | 31 | 14,7 |
Corridor | 5 | 2,4 |
Bathroom/toilet | 25 | 11,8 |
Fall Risk Score | Low | 16 | 7,6 |
| | High | 195 | 92,4 |
Causes of Falls | Patient - Related | 126 | 59,7 |
Caregiver - related | 70 | 33,2 |
Equipment - related | 10 | 4,7 |
Environment - related | 3 | 1,4 |
Staff - related | 1 | 0,5 |
Document - related | 1 | 0,5 |
Additional Diagnostic Tests After Fall | No | 196 | 92,9 |
Yes | 15 | 7,1 |
Fall Rate (per 1000 patients) | 2020 | 31 | 0,014 |
2021 | 22 | 0,008 |
2022 | 44 | 0,015 |
2023 | 36 | 0,011 |
2024 | 78 | 0,023 |
During the five-year study period, the distribution of patient falls by age and gender revealed that the highest number of falls occurred among male patients aged 65–80 years, followed by those in the 36–64 age group, and thirdly among children under the age of five (Fig. 2).
When the distribution of fall risk scores (low–high) was examined by age group, the majority of patients were identified as being in the high-risk category, predominantly within the 65–80 age group (Fig. 3).
The association between gender and fall risk was analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test, and no statistically significant relationship was found (p = 0.194).
Table 2
Analysis of the relationship between age and fall risk
Age | Low | High | p |
|---|
< 5 yaş | 4 | 42 | .239 |
6–17 yaş | 1 | 2 |
18–35 yaş | 1 | 9 |
36–64 yaş | 7 | 57 |
65–80 yaş | 3 | 61 |
> 81 | 0 | 24 |
The analysis of fall risk scores by age group demonstrated that the majority of patients across all age categories were classified as high risk. Specifically, in the 65–80 age group, 61 patients were identified as high risk compared to only 3 as low risk, while in patients older than 81 years, all cases (n = 24) were classified as high risk. Similarly, in the 36–64 age group, 57 patients were at high risk and only 7 at low risk. Among children under 5 years of age, 42 were categorized as high risk compared to 4 at low risk, whereas in the 6–17 age group, 2 patients were at high risk and 1 at low risk. The 18–35 age group also showed a predominance of high-risk cases (n = 9) compared to low-risk (n = 1). Statistical analysis using the Pearson Chi-Square test revealed no significant association between age and fall risk (p = .239). Despite the lack of statistical significance, the distribution indicates that older patients, particularly those aged 65 years and above, were more frequently classified as high risk, consistent with the literature highlighting advanced age as a major factor contributing to in-hospital falls (Table 2).
A root cause analysis was performed for patient falls during the study period. Based on the analysis, the causes of falls were classified into six main categories: patient-related, caregiver-related, equipment-related, environment-related, staff-related, and procedure-related factors. The findings are summarized as follows:
Patient-related factors included agitation or anxiety, impaired consciousness, dizziness, loss of balance due to absence of a caregiver, attempts to sit or lie down independently, efforts to avoid disturbing their caregiver, parental attempts to sleep next to or rock their infant/child, wearing inappropriate slippers, orthostatic hypotension, hypoglycemia, polypharmacy, imbalance due to inability to use one leg, noncompliance with instructions, leaving the bed without permission, lowering bedrails independently, muscle weakness due to hemiplegia, and slipping of mobility aids.
Caregiver-related factors involved failure to comply with fall prevention measures, leaving the patient unattended without notifying nursing staff, absence of a caregiver, inadequate implementation of safety measures, allowing the patient to mobilize alone, distraction or negligence, falling asleep while holding a baby, not locking wheelchair brakes, and independently lowering bedrails or stretcher rails.
Equipment-related factors included unsuitable stretchers, rapid wear and tear of bed or stretcher side rails, and use of inappropriate slippers. Environment-related factors included inadequate lighting (e.g., room lights turned off), absence of wet floor warnings, and improper use of handrails. Staff-related factors involved being occupied with emergencies or caring for other patients, as well as errors in fall risk assessment. Procedure-related factors included procedural errors and improper implementation of existing protocols.
The root cause analysis is presented in Fig. 4.
Discussion
Patient safety aims to create a secure environment in which potential adverse events such as falls, medication errors, and infections are systematically evaluated [31]. In this context, the prevention of inpatient falls is of vital importance for ensuring the integrity of diagnostic and therapeutic processes [32]. Falls occurring in hospital settings are considered a critical indicator of patient safety [33]. Conducting root cause analysis (RCA) of patient falls is essential to identify their underlying causes and to implement preventive action plans [31]. In this study, root cause analysis of inpatient falls reported over a five-year period in a tertiary training and research hospital was conducted and evaluated.
Although fall prevention interventions are effective, they require resources and should specifically target individuals at higher risk [21]. Efforts to reduce inpatient falls and their associated costs should prioritize patient engagement, education, and evidence-based interventions [34]. Hospital falls significantly prolong the length of stay (LOS), with reports indicating an additional 6 to 12 days of hospitalization following a fall [34] [35]. Similarly, falls have been associated with an average extension of 6.3 days in LOS [32].
Cognitive status plays a crucial role in increasing the likelihood of falls. A meta-analysis investigating hospital falls reported that 36.3% of patients who experienced falls presented with cognitive impairment [34]. Prominent risk factors for inpatient falls include advanced age (> 85 years), male sex, fall history, gait instability, visual impairment, agitation and/or confusion, adverse drug reactions, neurological and cardiovascular instability, orthostatic hypotension, and pharmacological agents such as antihypertensives and diuretics [32].[34].[19].[36]. Previous studies have indicated that approximately 12% of hospitalized patients experience at least one fall during their stay [6]. Reported incidence rates vary, ranging from 2.4 per 1000 patient-days in tertiary hospitals to 9.1 per 1000 patient-days in geriatric units. Older adults with cognitive impairment are particularly vulnerable to falls [32]. Elderly people with cognitive impairment are more likely to slip and fall, which is a significant risk factor for falls [37].
According to Xu et al. (2022), factors such as advanced age, low educational level, polypharmacy, malnutrition, living alone, urban residency, smoking, and alcohol consumption increase the likelihood of falls in older adults. Additionally, comorbidities including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, weakness, depression, Parkinson’s disease, and chronic pain are known contributors to fall risk [16][34]. Studies have also examined the activities during which falls occur, such as attempting to sit, stand, bend, get out of bed, use the bathroom without assistance, or walk unassisted. Frequently reported locations of falls include bathrooms, patient rooms, treatment areas, hallways, and common hospital spaces [38].
The first step in fall prevention is the identification of high-risk patients and the implementation of targeted risk-reduction programs [32].
A non-punitive, supportive reporting culture is critical to ensure accurate reporting. Hospital administrators should adopt a visionary, non-punitive approach to promote confidence in reporting systems [1]. Underreporting remains a major issue, with estimates suggesting that approximately 40% of inpatient falls are not reported. In one study, nearly 75% of nurses in a tertiary hospital considered incident reporting systems unsafe [23]
The root causes of hospital falls are often multifactorial, including patient-related factors (37.5%), environmental conditions (25%), organizational and process-related issues (19.6%), and staff communication problems (17.9%) [31]. Similarly, Cesar et al. (2025) reported that 76% of falls resulted from internal factors, while 21% were attributable to external causes [33]. Strategies for fall prevention include environmental modifications and physical safeguards (29.4%), risk assessment and monitoring (23.5%), patient and staff education (21.6%), standardized fall risk assessment tools (13.7%), and auditing and monitoring practices (11.8%) [31]. Evidence-based measures such as ensuring locked bed brakes, lowering bed height, providing bedside commodes, assisting patients during toileting, and hourly rounding have been identified as effective fall prevention strategies. However, qualitative studies have emphasized barriers including inconsistencies in guidelines, lack of patient awareness regarding fall risks, and inadequate interprofessional communication [34].
The consequences of inpatient falls include both physical and clinical outcomes. Approximately 59.2% of falls result in injuries, most commonly head injuries (49%). While some patients remain clinically stable post-fall, up to 20.4% experience instability [39]. Additional investigations, such as radiological imaging, are often required, [33].
Falls are frequently linked to inadequate patient/family education, insufficient supervision, lack of communication between nurses and patients, ineffective use of call bells, and poor adherence to fall prevention guidelines. Multicomponent interventions that incorporate patient and caregiver training, environmental modifications, and nursing supervision have been shown to reduce fall rates [15].
Nurses play a pivotal role in the early identification and prevention of falls due to their continuous patient interaction [40]. As the frontline of patient care, nurses are essential in empowering patients and families with knowledge about fall prevention strategies such as using call bells, wearing safe footwear, utilizing assistive devices, and seeking help during mobilization [41]. While falls cannot be completely eliminated, effective nursing interventions can substantially minimize fall risks and adverse outcomes [40].
Conclusion
A
In conclusion, falls represent a serious clinical problem among hospitalized patients, particularly older adults who face an increased risk of injury due to multiple contributing factors. Preventing inpatient falls requires a holistic approach that takes into account all potential risk factors. Falls in hospitalized patients are complex yet preventable adverse events that may result in patient harm, negatively affect clinical outcomes, and increase healthcare costs.
Key risk factors for falls include advanced age, cognitive impairment, polypharmacy, and comorbid medical conditions. Identifying and addressing these factors are critical steps toward preventing falls and ensuring patient safety in healthcare settings. Furthermore, demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors should be carefully considered when assessing fall risk.
Abbreviations
WHO (Worl Health Organizations)
HQS (Healthcare Quality Standards)
LOS (length of Stay)
RCA (Root cause analysis)
SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences)
SD (Standart Deviation)
Acknowledgements
The present document is the original work of the authors. Special thanks to Antalya Training and Research Hospital's authorities for their permission for this study.
A
Author Contribution
"H.E.K. and NÖ. gather study data, H.E.K. got ethical permission, H.E.K. and NÖ.wrote the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
A
Data Availability
The data from the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
adhering to appropriate human research ethics guidelines. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki, and all participants provided informed consent upon enrollment.
Author details
1 Research Development Department, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye
2 Research and Development Department, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye
References
1.Bhati D, Deogade MS, Kanyal D. Improving Patient Outcomes Through Effective Hospital Administration: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2023;15(10). 10.7759/cureus.47731.
2.Kiliç Ü, Özaydin Ö, Güdük Ö, Okut G. Hemşirelik bakım göstergesi olarak hastanelerdeki hasta düşmelerinin incelenmesi. ERÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;8(2):1–9.
3.WHO. Global patient safety report 2024, 2024.
4.S. E. B. M.M.Muyassarova, View of STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING PATIENT SAFETY IN HOSPITALS,. Western Eur J Med Med Sci. 2025;3(1):1–8.
5.Kalisch BJ, Tschannen D, Lee KH. Missed Nursing Care, Staffing, and Patient Falls. J Nurs Care Qual. Jan. 2012;27(1):6–12. 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e318225aa23.
6.Kalisch BJ, Tschannen D, Lee KH. Missed nursing care, staffing, and patient falls. J Nurs Care Qual. 2012;27(1):6–12. 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e318225aa23.
7.Eduhealth J. Literature Review: Factors Related to the Risk of Falls In the Elderly. Jurnal Eduhealth. 2025;16(02):936–42. 10.54209/eduhealth.v16i02.
8.Galloway M, Hoffman N, Bray CL, Ebrahim A, Puebla B, Ritchie D. Case Report: Weakness and Recurrent Falls in an Older Patient. Geriatr (Switzerland). 2025;10(2). 10.3390/geriatrics10020041.
9.Yasan C, Pretto G, Burton P. A High Fall Risk Patient Perspective—Reducing Safety Challenges in an Acute Care Hospital. Nurs Open. 2025;12(2):1–10. 10.1002/nop2.70161.
10.WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/falls, Falls.
11.Öden M, Van Giersbergen TN. Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations about Reducing Falls and Injury from Falls. J Qual Perform Healthc. no. 2021;18:17–40.
12.Tanwar R, Nandal N, Zamani M, Manaf AA. Pathway of Trends and Technologies in Fall Detection: A Systematic Review. Healthc (Switzerland). 2022;10(1):1–27. 10.3390/healthcare10010172.
13.Kouassi L, et al. Falls in the Elderly at Angre University Hospital. Open J Intern Med. 2025;15(02):79–96. 10.4236/ojim.2025.152009.
14.Schoberer D, Breimaier HE, Zuschnegg J, Findling T, Schaffer S, Archan T. Fall prevention in hospitals and nursing homes: Clinical practice guideline. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2022;19(2):86–93. 10.1111/wvn.12571.
15.Dykes PC, et al. Evaluation of a Patient-Centered Fall-Prevention Tool Kit to Reduce Falls and Injuries: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(11):E2025889. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25889.
16.Xu Q, Ou X, Li J. The risk of falls among the aging population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2022;10(4). 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902599.
17.Morris ME, et al. Interventions to reduce falls in hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2022;51(5):1–12. 10.1093/ageing/afac077.
18.Montero-Odasso MM, et al. Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Fall Prevention and Management for Older Adults: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(12):1–15. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38911.
19.Cioce M, et al. How to manage falls in hospitalized patients. Medicine. 2022;101(11). 10.1097/md.0000000000029132.
20.Thwaites C et al. October., Boosting hospital falls prevention using health assistant staff alongside usual care, Patient Educ Couns, vol. 130, no. 2024, p. 108464, 2025. 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108464
21.Stuby J, Leist P, Hauri N, Jeevanji S, Méan M, Aubert CE. Intervention to systematize fall risk assessment and prevention in older hospitalized adults: a mixed methods study. BMC Geriatr. 2025;25(1). 10.1186/s12877-025-05703-4.
22.Hill AM, et al. Implementing falls prevention patient education in hospitals - older people’s views on barriers and enablers. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1). 10.1186/s12912-024-02289-x.
23.Cho I, Park H, Park BS, Lee Dgeon. Enhancing Adverse Event Reporting With Clinical Language Models: Inpatient Falls. J Adv Nurs. 2025;1–12. 10.1111/jan.16812.
24.McKercher JP, et al. Hospital falls clinical practice guidelines: a global analysis and systematic review. Age Ageing. 2024;53:1–12. 10.1093/ageing/afae149.
25.Lee J, Negm A, Peters R, Wong EKC, Holbrook A. Deprescribing fall-risk increasing drugs (FRIDs) for the prevention of falls and fall-related complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):1–10. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035978.
26.Jarden RJ, et al. Inpatients’ experiences of falls: A qualitative meta-synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2025;81(1):4–19. 10.1111/jan.16244.
27.SB. Sağlıkta Kalite Standartları (SKS)-Hastane-Sürüm 6. 2020.
28.SB. Sağlıkta Kalite Standartları Gösterge Yönetimi Rehberi. 2023.
29.Tezcan B, Gülseven B, Karabacak. Fall Risk Assessment Scales Which are Frequently Used in Clinical Practice. J Acad Res Nurs. 2021;7(2):105–12. 10.55646/jaren.2021.88598.
30.SKS_VERSİYON 6-hastane-surum-6-setixlsx.
31.Lakbala P, Bordbar N, Fakhri Y. Root cause analysis and strategies for reducing falls among inpatients in healthcare facilities: A narrative review. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(7). 10.1002/hsr2.2216.
32.Mikos M, Banas T, Czerw A, Banas B, Strzępek Ł, Curyło M. Hospital inpatient falls across clinical departments. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15). 10.3390/ijerph18158167.
33.Cesar N, Jelić T, Kunštek S. Analysis of Patient Falls at Clinical Hospital Dubrava. Croatian Nurs J. 2025;9(1):115–26. 10.24141/2/9/1/10.
34.Locklear T, et al. Inpatient Falls: Epidemiology, Risk Assessment, and Prevention Measures. A Narrative Review. HCA Healthc J Med. 2024;5(5):517–25. 10.36518/2689-0216.1982.
35.Dykes PC, et al. Cost of Inpatient Falls and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Implementation of an Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Program. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(1). 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5125.
36.Salari N, Darvishi N, Ahmadipanah M, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of falls in the older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):1–13. 10.1186/s13018-022-03222-1.
37.Ghanim S, Mohamed S, Mohamed A, Hassan H. Nurses’ Knowledge and Practice for Reducing Falls among Older Adult Women. NILES J Geriatric Gerontol. 2024;7(1):104–26. 10.21608/niles.2024.318085.
38.Ghosh M, Connell BO, Yamoah EA, Kitchen S. A retrospective cohort study of factors associated with severity of falls in hospital patients. Sci Rep. no. 2022;12:1–9. 10.1038/s41598-022-16403-z.
39.Öztürk BD, Kavakli İ. Hasta Düşmelerini Etkileyen Faktörlerin İncelenmesi: Retrospektif Tanımlayıcı Bir Çalışma. Sağlıkta Kalite Ve Performans Dergisi. 2025;22(2):120–41.
40.İncirkuş K, Yıldız G, Tekir Mİ. Yaşlılarda düşme riski ve güncel hemşirelik yaklaşımları. Sağlık ve Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi. 2024;6(3):129–33. 10.33308/2687248x.202463344.
41.Heng H et al. Patient Perspectives on Hospital Falls Prevention Education, Front Public Health, vol. 9, no. March, pp. 1–9, 2021, 10.3389/fpubh.2021.592440