A
The Mannose Receptor on Sinusoidal Lining Cells Mediates Two-Step Bacterial Clearance in the Human Spleen
NeamaAlnabati1
FrancescoFlandi1
TareqSaoudi4
GiuliaCattabriga3,5
TaliaRichardson1,3
DanieleGhezzi3
RyanG.Hames1
JohnIsherwood4
TrishaKanani4
ZydruneJasiunaite1
ShyingTang1
GiulianaGerminario6
GiorgiaRadi7
FrancescaRizzo6
KatrinSchilcher1
ChristopherD.Bayliss1
CarolaParolin3
StefanoFedi3
WenY.Chung4
GiuseppeGarcea4
EnricoGiampieri6,7
GastoneCastellani6,7
KornelisStraatman8
StefanoBruno9
ClaudiaTrappetti3
MatteoRavaioli6,7
AshleyR.Dennison4
LuisaMartinez-Pomares10✉Email
MarcoR.Oggioni1,3,11✉Email
1College of Life Sciences, School of Biological and Biomedical SciencesUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
2Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceUmm Al-Qura UniversityMakkahSaudi
3
A
A
A
Department of Pharmacy and BiotechnologiesUniversity of BolognaItaly
4Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary SurgeryUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustLeicesterUK
5Department of Medical BiotechnologyUniversity of SienaSienaItaly
6IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaBolognaItaly
7Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
8Advanced Imaging FacilityUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
9Department of Food and DrugUniversity of ParmaParmaItaly
10School of Life SciencesUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
11FABIT, University of BolognaVia Piero Gobetti, 9340129BolognaBOItaly
Neama Alnabati1,2&, Francesco Flandi3&, Tareq Saoudi4, Giulia Cattabriga3,5, Talia Richardson1,3, Daniele Ghezzi3, Ryan G. Hames1, John Isherwood4, Trisha Kanani4, Zydrune Jasiunaite1, Shying Tang1, Giuliana Germinario6, Giorgia Radi7, Francesca Rizzo6, Katrin Schilcher1, Christopher D. Bayliss1, Carola Parolin3, Stefano Fedi3, Wen Y. Chung4, Giuseppe Garcea4, Enrico Giampieri6,7, Gastone Castellani6,7, Kornelis Straatman8, Stefano Bruno9, Claudia Trappetti3, Matteo Ravaioli6,7, Ashley R. Dennison4, Luisa Martinez-Pomares10,*, Marco R. Oggioni1,3,*
1 College of Life Sciences, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK;
2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi;
3 Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnologies, University of Bologna, Italy;
4 Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK;
5 Department of Medical Biotechnology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;
6 IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy;
7 Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy;
8 Advanced Imaging Facility, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK;
9 Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy;
10 School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK;
& These two authors contributed equally to this work
* Correspondence to Marco R Oggioni, FABIT, University of Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti, 93, 40129 Bologna BO, Italy, marcorinaldo.oggioni@unibo.it or Luisa Martinez-Pomares, luisa.m@nottingham.ac.uk.
Abstract
The human spleen is the main organ in preventing invasive bacterial infection, yet the cellular mechanisms driving pathogen clearance remain poorly defined. This work shows that there is division of labour in the human spleen for eliminating bacteria from the circulation. Using a dual translational approach including ex vivo perfusion of human spleen and splenic primary cell cultures, we demonstrate that sinusoidal cells capture and retain bacteria via the CD206 receptor in the splenic red pulp to enable bactericidal activity by tissue resident macrophages. This activity was dependent on bacterial capsule, with unencapsulated bacteria being cleared irrespective of inhibition of the mannose receptor. This implies a specific two-step process to ensure efficient removal of encapsulated pathogens. These data change completely our understanding of pathogen clearance in the human spleen, with profound implications for the development of host-directed anti-infective strategies and for the evaluation of conjugate vaccine efficacy.
Introduction
A
The human spleen is the main secondary lymphoid organ involved in the control of systemic infection1, particularly through its critical role in the removal of encapsulated bacteria from the circulation2. Loss of the spleen by splenectomy, and other forms of functional asplenia, expose patients to the risk of overwhelming sepsis, most commonly caused by capsulated bacteria3, 4, 5. This has led to the inclusion of asplenia as a key indication for vaccination in many countries6. Despite this the pneumococcus remains the leading cause of post-splenectomy sepsis7. While the processes of bacterial clearance by the human spleen are critically understudied, the mechanisms by which the spleen removes Plasmodium falciparum-infected red blood cells are well documented due to exploitation of the translational ex vivo human spleen prefusion models8.
In most human tissues, tissue resident macrophages express the mannose receptor (MRC1/CD206)9. However, in the human spleen neither the CD68+CD163+ red pulp macrophages (RPMs) nor the CD68+CD169+ perifollicular capillary sheath macrophages (PCSAMs) express the mannose receptor9. Instead, the CD206 receptor is expressed by the sinusoidal lining littoral cells, which make up the structure of the human spleen red pulp9, 11. Splenic sinuses are the walled irregular structures draining the open circulation of the human splenic red pulp and are lined by sinus endothelia alternatively named sinusoidal lining cells (CD206+, LYVE-1+, CD141+)11, 12, 13. The rationale behind this variation in CD206 expression in the human spleen is still unknown. The CD206 mannose receptor is a key molecule involved in the binding to bacteria, viruses and parasite-infected cells playing a key role in the interface between the human host and microbes. Binding of the mannose receptor to bacterial surface sugars, including capsular polysaccharides of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Klebsiella pneumoniae lipopolysaccharide (LPS)10, is one of the main mechanisms by which macrophages recognize these pathogens; and endocytosis of the receptor is associated to the uptake and the subsequent killing of the bacteria inside the macrophage compartments14. In addition, CD206 has been shown to mediate uptake of dengue virus and HBV into host cells15, 16 and recent work on the malaria parasite P. falciparum showed that infected red blood cells are efficiently captured via their surface polysaccharides by the CD206+ sinusoids, suggesting a crucial role of sinusoidal cells in the reduction of pathogen load17.
Investigation of host-pathogen interactions in the spleen, using murine infection models, non-human primate infections and ex vivo porcine spleen perfusion, revealed that systemic S. pneumoniae infections were predominantly cleared by splenic red pulp macrophages18, 19, 20, 21. While the spleen was the primary organ responsible for the clearance of bacteria, the rare occurrence of splenic replication in permissive macrophages facilitated re-seeding of bacteria to the bloodstream and initiation of systemic infection18, 19. The translational ex vivo human spleen perfusion model confirmed detection of bacterial clusters in human splenic macrophages21. However, the mannose receptor expression on sinusoidal endothelial cells and not macrophages raised the question about pathogen clearance mechanisms. Using the unique translational platform of human organ ex vivo perfusion alongside primary splenic cell co-cultures of macrophages and sinusoids, we tested the hypothesis that CD206-mediated capture by sinusoidal endothelial cells underlies the human spleen’s distinctive ability to filter, retain, and clear encapsulated bacteria. This host-species-specific adaptation sheds new light on splenic innate immune surveillance and has important implications for vaccine efficiency and the development of host-targeted therapies.
Results
Cellular marker distribution in the human spleen.
A
To determine the impact of CD206 expression on sinusoidal cells on the clearance of encapsulated bacteria in the human spleen, we applied a translational ex vivo human spleen perfusion model21 using organs sourced through the TIMID trial (REC 18/EM/0057; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04620824) and primary cells through the MOSIE trial (CE: 668/2023/Sper/AOUBo). Microscopy mapped the three red pulp markers, CD163, CD169, and CD206, to three distinct cell types: CD68+CD163+ red pulp macrophages (RPMs), CD68+CD169+ perifollicular capillary sheath–associated macrophages (PCSAMs), and sinusoid lining littoral CD206+LYVE-1+CD31 cells9, 22 (Fig. 1A–1B; Fig. S1A1-S1B). High-content scanning fluorescent microscopy revealed that RPMs and sinusoidal cells dominate the red pulp11 (Fig. 1A), while CD169+ macrophages clustered in sheaths around perifollicular capillaries, often forming ring-like structures adjacent to white pulp follicles22 (Fig. 1B). CD206+ sinusoids, CD163+ RPMs, and CD169+ macrophages occupied on average 36.5% (SD 4.13), 27.7% (SD 6.1), and 1.3% (SD 1.6) of the total splenic section area respectively, with ranges of 30.3–42.0%, 19.9–35.8%, and 0.07–4.6% (Fig. 1C). Marker abundance varied between spleens, up to 1.2-fold for CD206+, 2.7-fold for CD163+, and intriguingly 12.1-fold for CD169+ macrophages (Fig. 1D–1F), the latter reflecting differences in follicle density and microanatomy (Fig. S1C1–S1C3). Importantly, serial biopsies from the same spleen at different infection stages showed no variation in CD163 or CD206 levels (Fig. S1D1–S1D2), confirming the stability of these populations during perfusion and infection.
Fig. 1
A
Quantification of the major cell populations in the red pulp of the human spleen. A-B) Representative high-content fluorescent microscopy images of spleen sections stained for CD206+ sinusoidal cells (cyan), CD163+ RPMs (magenta), and CD169+ PCSAMs (red), with nuclear counterstaining using DAPI (grey). C) Quantification of marker-positive areas relative to the total DAPI area (µm²). D-F) Inter-individual variability in the abundance of each cell population across spleen samples. Spleens in figures are reported in Tab. S5.
Click here to Correct
Taken together, these observations reveal a compartmentalized immune architecture in human spleen, with CD206+ sinusoidal cells forming an extensive, blood-facing capture network; CD163+ macrophages distributed throughout the red pulp for removal of pathogens, senescent cells and debris; and rare CD169+ macrophages positioned around perifollicular regions, where they may regulate antigen entry into the white pulp23. This spatial arrangement underscores a division of labour in pathogen surveillance, placing CD206+ cells in an ideal position to intercept microbes during their first passage through the splenic open circulation.
Ex vivo organ perfusion.
A
A
A
Using the TIMID trial, human spleens were sourced for ex vivo normothermic organ perfusion to assess the splenic antibacterial clearance capacity. After cannulation and anticoagulant perfusion, spleens were transported on ice, connected to a normothermic circuit, and perfused with polymerised haemoglobin as an oxygen carrier. Systemic infection was simulated by introducing S. pneumoniae directly into the perfusion liquid mimicking hematogenous invasive human infections (Tab. S1), and serial biopsies and perfusate samples were taken over time to monitor the infection dynamics21. Across experiments, the spleen demonstrated a robust filtration capacity, removing over 90% of the inoculum within 60 minutes (Fig. 2A1-2B2, Fig. 2D1-2E2). Clearance kinetics were consistent whether challenged with individual strains or serotype mixtures (Tab. S1, Tab. S2). With limited organ availability, mixed infections guaranteed a more controlled experimental set-up allowing for both simultaneous testing of virulent and avirulent serotypes while minimising any potential impact of type-specific immunity of organ donors (Tab. S3). At a high-dose (1x108 cumulative CFU) of five equally counted serotypes (2, 4, 5, 6B, 19F), clearance was equally efficient across strains, regardless of invasive potential (Fig. 2A1–2B2)24. Similarly, the association of the bacteria with CD163+ RPMs and the less abundant CD169+ macrophages, based on image analysis, did not vary among serotypes (Fig. S2A1-S2A2). Neither the rapidity nor the extent of bacterial clearance in the human spleen was affected by the donor-derived level of antibacterial antibodies in the perfusion fluid (Tab. S3). At a lower dose (1x107 cumulative CFU), all serotypes were cleared from both perfusate and tissue within 30 minutes (Fig. 2D1–2E2). These kinetics underscore the spleen’s extraordinary capacity for rapid, non-discriminatory removal of encapsulated bacteria, even without high antibody titres. This observation aligns with the clinical reality of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI), where the absence of splenic tissue dramatically impairs early pathogen removal25. The uniformity of clearance across serotypes highlights a fundamental property of splenic immunity: its filtering capacity operates independently of serotype-specific immune history, a fact critical to understanding infection risk in asplenic patients25.
Contribution of the mannose receptor on sinusoids to bacterial clearance in the human spleen.
The mannose receptor (CD206) is a C-type lectin that binds high-mannose structures found on many pathogens, including the capsules of S. pneumoniae and LPS of K. pneumoniae10, 26, 27. In most tissues, CD206 is expressed by macrophages and dendritic cells and mediates bacterial binding and uptake10, 28. In the human spleen, however, macrophages lack CD206 entirely (Fig. 1A–1B, Fig. S2B-S2C3), despite the spleen being the primary site for pneumococcal clearance. Instead, CD206 is confined to sinusoidal lining cells, a distribution that raises an important mechanistic question: does splenic clearance rely on CD206-mediated capture by these sinusoidal cells rather than by macrophages?
To address this, we built on in vitro evidence that free mannose can block CD206–pathogen binding10. In the ex vivo perfusion model, spleens were pre-treated with 5 mM mannose alongside the 10–20 mM glucose required for host and bacterial metabolism. When challenged with a high pneumococcal dose (1x108 CFU), mannose-treated spleens failed to clear the bacteria, instead, counts instead accumulated progressively in both perfusate and tissue (Fig. 2C1-2C2). At a lower challenge dose (1x107 CFU), usually cleared within minutes, killing was completely abolished; bacteria instead proliferated rapidly (Fig. 2F1-2F2). These results identify the carbohydrate-binding activity of CD206 on sinusoidal lining cells as an essential initial step in pathogen clearance. Since the presence of glucose in the perfusion liquid and the cell culture medium blocks completely the pneumococcal mannose metabolism through carbon catabolite repression29, the observed escape from host-mediated clearance cannot be ascribed to an effect of mannose on the bacteria. Rather, it reflects direct interference with receptor-mediated capture.
To complement the quantification of viable bacteria, we used high-content scanning fluorescence microscopy to examine the association of pneumococci with splenic macrophages and sinusoidal cells in tissue sections obtained during ex vivo perfusion. This analysis reinforced the clearance findings: across all time points, 16–21% of tissue-associated bacteria colocalized with CD206 (Fig. 3A1), a proportion that remained stable despite a 90% reduction in total bacterial load during the first hour (Fig. 2). Correspondingly, the area of sinusoidal tissue occupied by bacteria showed no decline (Fig. 3A2). Three-dimensional confocal reconstructions revealed discrete clusters of CD206 in direct contact with bacteria (Fig. 3B1-3B2). In mannose-treated spleens, bacterial association with CD206 fell sharply at early time points (Fig. 3A1), coinciding with higher viable counts and broader sinusoidal distribution later (Fig. 3A2).
Fig. 2
Bacterial counts during ex vivo spleen perfusion. A1-F2) Bacterial counts for six human spleens perfused with a mixture of pneumococcal isolates (Mix 1) (A-F). All organs were challenged with an equal mix of five S. pneumoniae isolates (type 2: upward triangle; type 4: downward triangle; type 5: circle; type 6A: diamond; type 19F: square) at a cumulative dose of 1x108 CFU (high-dose; HD) (panels A-C) or 1x107 CFU (low-dose; LD) (panels D-F). Bacterial counts are reported for millilitres (mL) of perfusion liquid (A1-F1) and gram (g) of tissue biopsy (A2-F2). Panels C1–C2 and F1–F2 show bacterial counts in spleens perfused with 5 mM mannose in the perfusion liquid, added 30 minutes before bacterial challenge with the high-dose (C) and the low-dose (F) of pneumococci. No such treatment was given in spleens A, B, D and E. Bacterial counts are reported over six hours of infection. Dotted lines represent the limit of detection (2x102 CFU). Spleens perfused in these panels are listed in Tab. S5.
Click here to Correct
Fig. 3
Association of pneumococci with splenic macrophages and sinusoidal cells during ex vivo perfusion, with and without mannose supplementation. A1) Quantification of the percentage of tissue-associated pneumococci colocalising with CD206+ sinusoidal cells at different time points post-infection (hour), under normal perfusion conditions (white bars) and with mannose supplementation (grey bars). A2) Analysis of the sinusoidal area occupied by bacteria over time of perfusion. Control samples are shown in white bars while mannose-supplemented tissues in grey bars. B1) 3D confocal reconstruction showing CD206 (red) expression in relation to pneumococci (green). B2) 3D reconstruction revealing the interaction between bacteria (green), CD206+ sinusoidal cells (red) and CD163+ macrophages (magenta). Blue shows the cell nuclei in DAPI staining. Images (panel B) are representative of ≥ 9 fields of view from n = 2 independent human spleens and for two different (TIGR4 and 19F) pneumococcal serotype, with similar results obtained in all cases. C1-C3) WGA (C2-C3, yellow) staining of spleen section showing the localization of CD206 (C1-C3, red) and bacteria (C2-C3, green) on splenic sinusoidal cells. Cells nuclei are shown is DAPI staining (blue). Images (panel C) are representative of 2 fields of view from n = 2 independent time point of infections (0 and 6 hours), with similar results obtained in all cases. D1-D2) Quantification of pneumococcal association with CD163⁺ RPMs at 30 minutes, 2 hours, and 5 hours post-infection under control conditions (white bars) and mannose supplementation (grey bars). E1-E2) Colocalization of pneumococci with CD169⁺ perifollicular macrophages during normal perfusion (white bars) and with mannose supplementation conditions (grey bars). Time is expressed in hour (h) of infection. Dotted lines indicate our limit of detections (D2, E2: 0.002%). Marker associations (panels A, D and E) were calculated in Fiji (v1.53). Regions of interest (ROIs) were defined using the Image > Adjust > Threshold function for each cell population. These ROIs were then applied to the bacterial fluorescence channels to assess bacterial association to macrophages and sinusoidal cells through particles analysis. Statistical significance (panels A, D and E) was determined between the datasets for each time point by ordinary one way-ANOVA with Kruskal-Wallis post-hoc (ns: P > 0.05; *: P ≤ 0.05; **: P ≤ 0.01; ***: P ≤ 0.001; ****: P ≤ 0.0001). Spleens analysed in these panels are listed in Tab. S5.
Click here to Correct
To determine the fate of these captured bacteria, we performed wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) staining, which confirmed that CD206+ sinusoidal cells do not internalise bacteria (Fig. 3C1-3C3). Instead, captured bacteria remained extracellular, suggesting that these cells act as stationary traps. Additional quantification showed that 20% of pneumococci colocalised with CD163+ RPMs at 30 min, 2 h, and 5 h post-infection (Fig. 3D1), and that mannose treatment significantly reduced this association (Fig. 3D1). Although CD169+ macrophages were less abundant, their bacterial association was also diminished by mannose (Fig. 3E1-3E2).
To provide in vitro evidence for the phenotypes observed during ex vivo spleen perfusion, primary adherent cell cultures were established from human spleen homogenates. Primary spleen cultures contained 57% CD206⁺ sinusoidal cells and 35% CD163⁺ macrophages (Fig. 4A1), often linked by extensions (Fig. 4A2). Only CD14⁺ cells comprised only 1.4%, indicating rare monocytes, possibly overlapping with the CD206⁺ population30.Low-MOI infections showed that 2.1% of bacteria attached to CD206+ cells (Fig. 4B1) and 0.6% to CD163+ macrophages (Fig. 4B2). Mannose or anti-CD206 antibodies reduced bacterial binding to CD206+ cells (Fig. 4B1) but not to CD163+ macrophages (Fig. 4B2). The expression of CD206 on primary sinusoidal cells, and not macrophages, was confirmed by CD206+ co-expression with the sinusoidal marker LYVE-1 (Fig. 4C). Three-dimensional reconstructions confirmed that pneumococci remained on the surface of CD206+ cells (Fig. 4D1–4D2), while bacteria appeared intracellular only in macrophages (Fig. 4E1–4E2). At MOI 10, bacterial counts dropped sharply within 30 min for both TIGR4 and D39 serotypes (Fig. 4F1, 4G1), but this bactericidal activity was lost when CD206 was blocked by mannose or antibodies (Fig. 4F1, 4G1). In contrast, when cultures were challenged with a non-encapsulated derivative of the TIGR4 strain, over 99% of bacteria were eliminated within 30 minutes (Fig. 4F2), and this killing was unaffected by mannose supplementation (Fig. 4F2). The same behaviour was observed for a rough non-encapsulated D39 strain (Fig. 4G2). These results strongly suggest that CD206-mediated bacterial attachment to sinusoidal cells is essential for enabling subsequent macrophage-mediated killing of encapsulated, sugar-coated pathogens. The control experiments with the non-encapsulated strains reinforce the conclusion that the CD206-dependent interaction between sinusoidal cells and macrophages is not required for the clearance of un-encapsulated bacteria. In addition to pneumococcal capsules, CD206 had been shown to bind also K. pneumoniae LPS 10. Repeating the bactericidal assay with capsulated K2 capsule K. pneumoniae and K1 capsule Escherichia coli, confirmed CD206-dependence for any bactericidal activity of macrophages (Fig. 4H1-4H2). These in vitro results fully confirm the observations during organ perfusion, indicating that CD206-mediated bacterial attachment to sinusoidal cells is essential for enabling subsequent macrophage-mediated killing of encapsulated pathogens.
Fig. 4
CD206-dependent bacterial clearance by splenic adherent macrophages. A1) Quantification of the primary splenic cell population after 24 hours of culture on collagen-coated wells. These data report the percentage of CD163+ RPMs, CD206+ sinusoidal cells and only negligible numbers of potential monocyte derived CD14+ cells per field. A2) Characterization of the primary cell culture by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy. CD163+ macrophages are shown in yellow, CD206+ sinusoidal cells in red and CD163-CD206-CD14+ cells in green. B1-B2) Analysis of pneumococcal association to CD206+ sinusoidal cells (B1) and CD163+ macrophages of three independent field of view for each condition (B2) (white bars: control condition; grey bars: inhibitory conditions D-mannose, anti-CD206 alone and in combination). C) Lyve-1 (yellow) expression by CD206+ cells (red). Cells nuclei are shown in DAPI staining (blue). D1-E2) 3D confocal reconstruction of the interaction between bacteria (green), splenic sinusoids (red) and CD163+ RPMs (yellow), showing intracellular bacteria only in macrophages. F1, G1) Quantification of bacterial survival 30 minutes post-infection for the TIGR4 (F1) and D39 strains (G1), during control conditions (white bars) and after the addition of 5mM mannose or anti-CD206 antibodies (grey bars) to the culture medium. F2-G2) Cultures infected with non-encapsulated derivatives of TIGR4 (F2) and D39 (G2). H1-H2) CD206-dependent killing of the K. pneumoniae strain GMR15 (H1) and of the E. coli strain UTI-89 (H2). F1-H2) experiments were performed in triplicates. Graphs report mean and standard deviation (SD) (F1: 43.7, SD 1.7; 94.8, SD 5.8; 86.3, SD 7.2; 90.8, SD 4.9. F2: 0.36, SD 0.01; 0.31, SD 0.04. G1: 31.7, SD 6.7; 79. 2, SD 9.1. G2: 16.3, SD 1.7; 19.4, SD 3.9; 19.4, SD 7.0. H1: 96.7, SD 4.0; 154, SD 10; 158, SD 13; 164, SD 7.3. H2: 38, SD 6.8; 55.4, SD 3.7). Dotted lines indicate our limit of detections (B1-B2: 0.03%). Statistical significance was determined by ordinary one way-ANOVA (B; F1; G2; H1) and t-test (F2; G1; H2) (ns: P > 0.05; *: P ≤ 0.05; **: P ≤ 0.01; ***: P ≤ 0.001; ****: P ≤ 0.0001). Spleens analysed in these panels are listed in Tab. S5.
Click here to Correct
These observations support a sequential “handoff” model: CD206+ sinusoidal cells capture encapsulated bacteria without internalisation, then present them to macrophages for phagocytosis and killing. Blocking CD206 prevents this initial capture and reduces downstream bacterial association with macrophages. Importantly, this arrangement mirrors receptor-mediated antigen transfer in other lymphoid organs31 but it is specialised for bloodstream pathogen clearance.
Unlike the traditional view that attributes CD206-mediated clearance to macrophages9, 27, our data show that in the human spleen, these cells are non-phagocytic stromal elements. Functionally, they behave like biological flypaper, retaining pathogens at the sinusoidal lining surface until macrophages, particularly CD163+ and CD169+ subsets, engage them (Fig. S2B-S2C3). The mannose-inhibitable spectrum of this capture extends beyond pneumococcus to multiple encapsulated species, echoing mechanical retention of poorly deformable cells in splenic sinuses32, 33 but based on biochemical glycan recognition.
A
The therapeutic implications are twofold: enhancing CD206-mediated capture could strengthen host defences, while systemic mannose administration, as in some urinary tract infection (UTIs) treatments34, could inadvertently impair splenic clearance. Our findings also clarify that in the spleen, CD206 is not a macrophage marker but a functional receptor on sinusoidal cells. This corrects earlier assumptions that CD206-mediated phagocytosis in spleen was macrophage-driven9, 35 repositioning these cells as dedicated antigen-capturing and presenting cells. By capturing encapsulated bacteria via mannose recognition, these sinusoidal cells transform a microbial evasion strategy, the anti-phagocytic capsule, into a vulnerability. The concept parallels earlier work showing that erythrocytes with exposed mannoses, including P. falciparum–infected cells, are preferentially retained and cleared17. Our results extend this to bacteria, demonstrating that the spleen uses mannose recognition to detect and trap both infected cells and encapsulated microbes. In summary, the human spleen is not just a passive filter but an active immune organ combining physical, biochemical, and receptor-mediated mechanisms to eliminate bloodstream threats. Redefining CD206+ sinusoidal cells as non-phagocytic, but indispensable for microbial capture, offers a new perspective on splenic immunity and opens the door to targeted interventions that reinforce this early line of defence.
Mechanism of pathogen clearance by both CD163+ and of CD169+ macrophages.
The two dominant splenic macrophage subsets, CD163+ RPMs and the less abundant CD169+ PCSAMs, operate in distinct but complementary niches22. Quantitative colocalization revealed that 15–30% of bacteria were associated with CD163+ macrophages, while 4–22% associated with CD169+ macrophages (Fig. 5A1-5A2). Notably, these proportions were consistent between early (30 min) and late (5 h) time points, despite > 90% clearance of bacteria from the perfusate within the first hour. In addition, microscopy analyses of tissue sections with high or low bacterial loads revealed a consistent ratio of bacteria-to-macrophage association across both CD163+ and CD169+ populations (Fig. 5B1-5B2), suggesting that even at high challenge doses, macrophage capacity for bacterial clearance was not saturated. The ratios remained consistent across different bacterial loads and serotypes (2, 4, 19F) (Fig S2A1-S2A2), indicating stable, load-independent pathogen engagement by these macrophage subsets. When fluorescent beads were perfused instead of live bacteria (Fig. S3A-S3C), macrophage uptake was slower, with association rates increasing progressively over time (Fig. 5A1–5A2). This slower uptake highlights the dynamic responsiveness of splenic macrophages to live microbes versus inert particles, reflecting an ability to accelerate engagement when genuine pathogens are detected. While these data do not allow quantification of the relative bactericidal contributions of each macrophage subset, they indicate that both CD163+ and CD169+ macrophages consistently retained similar bacterial loads over time, implying a comparable role in pneumococcal capture and clearance.
To investigate the mechanisms of bacterial killing by human spleen tissue-resident macrophages, spleen sections, at different time points of infection (from 0 to 6 h) were stained for the phagosome maturation marker LAMP1. LAMP1 staining, marking lysosomal compartments, revealed a progressive increase in infected spleens, but not in uninfected controls (Fig. 5C). This signal was localised mainly within macrophages (Fig. 5D1–5D2), consistent with active lysosomal engagement. Interestingly, minimal LAMP1–pneumococcus colocalization was observed, indicating that at early time points, bacteria-containing phagosomes may not yet have matured into fully degradative compartments (data not shown). Overall, the time-dependent increase in LAMP1 levels supports the conclusion that human spleen macrophages remain engaged in active phagocytosis during our ex vivo perfusion model and exhibit dynamic features of the phagocytic process.
Fig. 5
Bacterial uptake and bactericidal activity of human splenic macrophages during ex vivo perfusion. A1-A2) Colocalization analysis of pneumococcal association with CD163+ RPMs (A1, red) CD169+ PCSAMs (A2, blue) over the course of the perfusion. Association of fluorescent micro-beads with CD163+ (A1, light red) and CD169+ macrophages (A2, light blue) are also reported. B1, B2) Linear association dynamics between bacterial burden and macrophage area occupation. Simple linear regression lines of best fit were determined for RPMs (B1, red) and PCSAMs (B2, blue). Each point represents a single analysed biopsy sample, and all spleens are included. Solid lines and filled circles represent D39, and dotted lines and open circles represent TIGR4. The R2 value for each line is written adjacent to the appropriate line on each graph C) Quantification of LAMP1 over time, normalized to the total tissue area in different infected spleens (black bars) and in perfused control spleens (white bars). D1-D2) LAMP1 colocalization with CD163+ (D1, red) and CD169+ (D2, blue) macrophages in infected spleens (red and blue bars), in micro-beads perfused spleen (light-red and light-blue bars) and in control spleens (white bars) during the time of the perfusion. E1, E2) Quantification of cleaved caspase-3 signal in CD163+ RPMs (E1) and CD169+ PCSAMs (E2) over the time of perfusion. F1, F2) Analysis of the M30 levels in CD163+ (F1, red bars) and CD169+ (F2, blue bars) macrophages during infection. Panels A and C-F report means with standard deviations. Dotted lines represent our limit of detection (E1, E2, F1: 0.1%; F2: 0.01%). Time expressed in hours (h). Statistical significance was determined by ordinary one way-ANOVA with Kruskal-Wallis post-hoc (ns: P > 0.05; *: P ≤ 0.05; **: P ≤ 0.01; ***: P ≤ 0.001; ****: P ≤ 0.0001). Spleens analysed in these panels are listed in Tab. S5.
Click here to Correct
Apoptosis has long been recognized as a key mechanism by which human alveolar macrophages eliminate pneumococci36. To assess whether this mechanism is also active in human splenic macrophages, tissue sections were stained for cleaved caspase-3, the activated form of the caspase responsible for executing apoptotic proteolysis37, 38. The infection triggered an early apoptotic response. Within 60 minutes, cleaved caspase-3 levels rose rapidly, over 10-fold in both CD163+ RPMs and in CD169+ macrophages (Fig. 5E1–5E2), with the latter showing 10x higher per-cell signal (Fig. S2D1–S2D2). In bead-perfused controls, this apoptotic rise was slower and less pronounced, suggesting that live bacterial infection accelerates cell death programmes. M30 staining, indicative of caspase-3–cleaved cytokeratin-1839, 40, increased steadily over 5–6 hours in both subsets (Fig. 5F1–5F2), with the M30-positive macrophage area expanding accordingly. Mannose-treated and untreated spleens showed similar trends and were pooled in the graphs (Fig. S2E1–S2E2).
Considering that a human spleen contains approximately 2x1010 macrophages41, we found that at the 1-hour mark, 0.65% of CD163+ macrophages were positive for cleaved caspase-3 (Fig. 5E1–5E2). This corresponds to roughly 7x107 to 3x108 apoptotic cells per spleen; numbers that closely match the bacterial challenge dose of 1x108 CFU. This correspondence suggests a direct link between the quantity of phagocytosed bacteria and the induction of macrophage apoptosis.
The lysosomal activation observed after bacterial uptake, marked by increased LAMP1 expression, confirms that splenic macrophages engage in canonical phagolysosomal killing42. However, the concurrent detection of early cleaved caspase-3 within just 60 minutes, followed by M30 expression at 5–6 hours, indicates that bacterial clearance in the spleen is closely coupled to programmed cell death. This differs from the delayed apoptosis reported in other macrophage populations, such as alveolar macrophages, where cell death typically occurs in the resolution phase of infection36, 43. The spleen’s context may explain this difference. As a blood-filtering organ, it is uniquely exposed to high concentrations of circulating pathogens. In such an environment, rapid apoptosis following phagocytosis could serve as both a terminal killing step and a containment measure, ensuring that intracellular pathogens cannot persist within surviving macrophages. This swift apoptotic turnover may also act as a chemotactic signal to recruit additional phagocytes, maintaining clearance efficiency even, as individual macrophages are lost. The timing of this response is likely critical for neutralising pathogens capable of manipulating macrophage survival. Neisseria meningitidis, for example, can delay apoptosis via nitric oxide detoxification44, prolonging its intracellular survival. The early initiation of apoptosis in splenic macrophages could therefore represent an evolved countermeasure against such strategies, an immunological “self-destruct” that denies bacteria a long-term niche.
Our findings support a revised model of splenic antibacterial defence in which CD206⁺ sinusoidal cells and macrophages act in coordinated sequence. CD206⁺ lining cells first immobilise encapsulated bacteria via mannose-dependent glycan recognition without internalisation, preventing their return to circulation and enabling targeted clearance. CD163⁺ and CD169⁺ macrophages then receive these retained bacteria, phagocytose them, initiate lysosomal degradation, and undergo rapid apoptosis, ensuring efficient destruction while preventing intracellular persistence and systemic re-seeding.
This architecture bears resemblance to antigen-handling systems in lymph nodes, where lymphatic endothelial cells and subcapsular sinus macrophages coordinate pathogen retention and transfer31. However, the splenic system is tuned for speed and broad-spectrum efficiency, particularly against encapsulated bacteria that evade complement-mediated lysis and antibody opsonisation. In effect, the capsule, a key virulence factor, becomes a vulnerability when confronted with CD206-mediated capture. The efficiency of this system underscores why loss of splenic function, whether through splenectomy, infarction, or disease-related atrophy 3, 4, 5, carries such a high risk of overwhelming infection (OPSI), particularly from encapsulated organisms25. These patients lack both the macrophage-rich red pulp and the specialised sinusoidal cell network, severely compromising their capacity to trap and neutralise bloodstream bacteria. Functional hyposplenism, as seen in sickle cell disease or celiac disease, often involves reduced sinusoidal cell density, further increasing vulnerability to severe bacterial infections45, 46.
Spleen ex vivo perfusion, used for malaria⁸,¹⁷ and proposed for bacterial studies²¹, has limitations, some linked to reperfusion injury (e.g., high cytokines and soluble proteins) (Fig. S4)⁴⁷, whose impact we did not assess. Recognising the central role of CD206-mediated capture suggests new interventions, such as mannosylated nanoparticles to enhance vaccine delivery⁴⁸ or strategies to preserve/replace macrophages to boost killing capacity. Conversely, systemic free mannose, used to prevent UPEC adhesion³⁴, could transiently inhibit splenic CD206, impairing clearance of encapsulated pathogens. This risk may be important in patients with complicated UTI, concurrent bacteraemia, or reduced splenic reserve, warranting clinical caution.
A
A
Acknowledgements:
All authors thank the numerous patients in Leicester and Bologna consenting to participate in the clinical trials on which all the research work is based and the Research Governance Office of the University of Leicester and the respective office of the university of Bologna to sponsor the trials. Authors also thank Zaf Zafirelis from HbO2 Therapeutics (Souderton, PA, USA) for donating Hemopure, Kevin West for help with the H&E stains, and the University of Leicester Advanced Imaging Facility (RRID:SCR_020967) for use of microscope equipment, and the microscopy facility of the University of Bologna.
A
Author contributions:
NA acquired, analysed and interpreted the microbiological and microscopy data and contributed to the drafting of the manuscript, FF acquired, analysed and interpreted the microbiological and microscopy data, developed the primary cell cultures and drafted the first version of the manuscript, TS, TK, JI, WC and GGa. Managed of patient consent in UK and performed the surgical part of the experimental work, acquired, analysed and interpreted the data, GC, TR, DG, RH, ZJ, ST acquired, analysed and interpreted the microbiological and microscopy data and contributed to the drafting of the manuscript, GGe, GR, and FR managed patient consent and clinical data in Italy, EG, GC and KSt supervised microscopy work in Italy and UK respectively, S.B. contributed development of perfusion liquid, KSc, CDB, CEP, SF and CT supervised cell culture and microbiology work, MR and AD contribute to study design, experimental set-up, performed and oversaw surgical part of the project in Italy and UK respectively, LMP contributed to the study design, data analysis and oversaw the immunological part of the project and contributed to the drafting and finalising of the manuscript, MRO contributed to the study design, oversaw the microbiological and microscopy data analysis and contributed to the funding of the work.
A
Funding:
The work was funded by EU funding within the MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT) to MRO and GC, PRIN 2020 grant 202089LLEH and PRIN PNRR P2022M8KYE from the Italian Ministry of Education, BBSRC grant BB/V01465X/1 and the UK Biomedical Research Centre grant NIHR203327 to MRO and a BBSRC Impact Accelerator Account (IAA) award (RM32G0178B7) to KS NA is supported by a PhD fellowship from Umm AlQura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material
References
1.
Morris DH, Bullock FD (1919) The importance of the spleen in resistance to infection. Ann Surg 70(5):513–531
2.
Lammers AJ, De Porto AP, Florquin S, De Boer OJ, Bootsma HJ, Hermans PW, Van der Poll T (2011) Enhanced vulnerability for Streptococcus pneumoniae sepsis during asplenia is determined by the bacterial capsule. Immunobiology 216(8):863–870
3.
Holdsworth RJ, Cuschieri A, Irving AD (1991) Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: actual versus perceived risks. Br J Surg 78(9):1031–1038
4.
Gea-Izquierdo E, Rodríguez-Caravaca G, Gil-Prieto R, Hernández-Barrera V, Gil-de-Miguel (2024) Á. Streptococcus pneumoniae infection in patients with asplenia: a Spanish perspective over a 25-Year period. Antibiotics, 13(1), 104
5.
Adriani KS, Brouwer MC, van der Ende A, van de Beek D (2013), June Bacterial meningitis in adults after splenectomy and hyposplenic states. In Mayo Clinic proceedings (Vol. 88, No. 6, pp. 571–578). Elsevier
6.
Pebody RG, Leino T, Nohynek H, Hellenbrand W, Salmaso S, Ruutu P (2005) Pneumococcal vaccination policy in Europe. Euro Surveill 10(9):174–178
7.
Theilacker C, Ludewig K, Serr A, Schimpf J, Held J, Bögelein M, Kern WV (2016) Overwhelming postsplenectomy infection: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 62(7):871–878
8.
Buffet PA, Milon G, Brousse V, Correas JM, Dousset B, Couvelard A, David PH (2006) Ex vivo perfusion of human spleens maintains clearing and processing functions. Blood 107(9):3745–3752
9.
Martinez-Pomares L, Hanitsch LG, Stillion R, Keshav S, Gordon S (2005) Expression of mannose receptor and ligands for its cysteine-rich domain in venous sinuses of human spleen. Lab Invest 85(10):1238–1249
10.
Zamze S, Martinez-Pomares L, Jones H, Taylor PR, Stillion RJ, Gordon S, Wong SY (2002) Recognition of bacterial capsular polysaccharides and lipopolysaccharides by the macrophage mannose receptor. J Biol Chem 277(44):41613–41623
11.
Qiu J, Salama ME, Hu CS, Li Y, Wang X, Hoffman R (2018) The characteristics of vessel lining cells in normal spleens and their role in the pathobiology of myelofibrosis. Blood Adv 2(10):1130–1145
12.
Steiniger BS, Pfeffer H, Gaffling S, Lobachev O (2022) The human splenic microcirculation is entirely open as shown by 3D models in virtual reality. Sci Rep 12(1):16487
13.
Steiniger BS (2015) Human spleen microanatomy: why mice do not suffice. Immunology 145(3):334–346
14.
Stahl PD, Ezekowitz RAB (1998) The mannose receptor is a pattern recognition receptor involved in host defense. Curr Opin Immunol 10(1):50–55
15.
Miller JL, deWet BJM, Martinez-Pomares L, Radcliffe CM, Dwek RA, Rudd PM, Gordon S (2008) The mannose receptor mediates dengue virus infection of macrophages. PLoS Pathog, 4(2), e17
16.
den Brouw MLO, Binda RS, Geijtenbeek TB, Janssen HL, Woltman AM (2009) The mannose receptor acts as hepatitis B virus surface antigen receptor mediating interaction with intrahepatic dendritic cells. Virology 393(1):84–90
17.
Cao H, Antonopoulos A, Henderson S, Wassall H, Brewin J, Masson A, Vickers MA (2021) Red blood cell mannoses as phagocytic ligands mediating both sickle cell anaemia and malaria resistance. Nat Commun 12(1):1792
18.
Gerlini A, Colomba L, Furi L, Braccini T, Manso AS, Pammolli A, Oggioni MR (2014) The role of host and microbial factors in the pathogenesis of pneumococcal bacteraemia arising from a single bacterial cell bottleneck. PLoS Pathog, 10(3), e1004026
19.
Ercoli G, Fernandes VE, Chung WY, Wanford JJ, Thomson S, Bayliss CD, Oggioni MR (2018) Intracellular replication of Streptococcus pneumoniae inside splenic macrophages serves as a reservoir for septicaemia. Nat Microbiol 3(5):600–610
20.
Chung WY, Wanford JJ, Kumar R, Isherwood JD, Haigh RD, Oggioni MR, Ercoli G (2018) An ex vivo porcine spleen perfusion as a model of bacterial sepsis. ALTEX: Altern Anim Experimentation 36(1):29–38
21.
Carreno D, Wanford JJ, Jasiunaite Z, Hames RG, Chung WY, Dennison AR, Oggioni MR (2021) Splenic macrophages as the source of bacteraemia during pneumococcal pneumonia. EBioMedicine, 72
22.
Nagelkerke SQ, Bruggeman CW, Den Haan JM, Mul EP, Van Den Berg TK, Van Bruggen R, Kuijpers TW (2018) Red pulp macrophages in the human spleen are a distinct cell population with a unique expression of Fc-γ receptors. Blood Adv 2(8):941–953
23.
Mebius RE, Kraal G (2005) Structure and function of the spleen. Nat Rev Immunol 5(8):606–616
24.
Brueggemann AB, Griffiths DT, Meats E, Peto T, Crook DW, Spratt BG (2003) Clonal relationships between invasive and carriage Streptococcus pneumoniae and serotype-and clone-specific differences in invasive disease potential. J Infect Dis 187(9):1424–1432
25.
Brigden ML (2001) Detection, education and management of the asplenic or hyposplenic patient. Am Family Phys 63(3):499–508
26.
East L, Isacke CM (2002) The mannose receptor family. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA)-General Subj 1572(2–3):364–386
27.
Martinez-Pomares L (2012) The mannose receptor. J Leukoc Biol 92(6):1177–1186
28.
Subramanian K, Neill DR, Malak HA, Spelmink L, Khandaker S, Dalla Libera Marchiori G, Henriques-Normark B (2019) Pneumolysin binds to the mannose receptor C type 1 (MRC-1) leading to anti-inflammatory responses and enhanced pneumococcal survival. Nat Microbiol 4(1):62–70
29.
Bidossi A, Mulas L, Decorosi F, Colomba L, Ricci S, Pozzi G, Oggioni MR (2012) A functional genomics approach to establish the complement of carbohydrate transporters in Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e33320
30.
Gordon S, Plüddemann A, Mukhopadhyay S (2015) Sinusoidal immunity: macrophages at the lymphohematopoietic interface. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7(4):a016378
31.
Phan TG, Green JA, Gray EE, Xu Y, Cyster JG (2009) Immune complex relay by subcapsular sinus macrophages and noncognate B cells drives antibody affinity maturation. Nat Immunol 10(7):786–793
32.
Deplaine G, Safeukui I, Jeddi F, Lacoste F, Brousse V, Perrot S, Buffet PA (2011) The sensing of poorly deformable red blood cells by the human spleen can be mimicked in vitro. Blood J Am Soc Hematol 117(8):e88–e95
33.
Safeukui I, Correas JM, Brousse V, Hirt D, Deplaine G, Mulé S, Buffet PA (2008) Retention of Plasmodium falciparum ring-infected erythrocytes in the slow, open microcirculation of the human spleen. Blood J Am Soc Hematol 112(6):2520–2528
34.
Hayward G, Mort S, Hay AD, Moore M, Thomas NP, Cook J, Butler CC (2024) d-Mannose for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection among women: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 184(6):619–628
35.
Jackson DG, Prevo R, Clasper S, Banerji S (2001) LYVE-1, the lymphatic system and tumor lymphangiogenesis. Trends Immunol 22(6):317–321
36.
Dockrell DH, Marriott HM, Prince LR, Ridger VC, Ince PG, Hellewell PG, Whyte MK (2003) Alveolar macrophage apoptosis contributes to pneumococcal clearance in a resolving model of pulmonary infection. J Immunol 171(10):5380–5388
37.
Gao LY, Abu Kwaik Y (1999) Apoptosis in macrophages and alveolar epithelial cells during early stages of infection by Legionella pneumophila and its role in cytopathogenicity. Infection and immunity, 67(2), 862–870. Häcker H, Fürmann C, Wagner H and
38.
Häcker G (2002) Caspase-9/-3 activation and apoptosis are induced in mouse macrophages upon ingestion and digestion of Escherichia coli bacteria. J Immunol 169(6):3172–3179
A
39.
Leers MP, Kölgen W, Björklund V, Bergman T, Tribbick G, Persson B, Schutte B (1999) Immunocytochemical detection and mapping of a cytokeratin 18 neo-epitope exposed during early apoptosis. J Pathol 187(5):567–572
A
40.
Ulukaya E, Karaagac E, Ari F, Oral AY, Adim SB, Tokullugil AH, Evrensel T (2011) Chemotherapy increases caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 in the serum of breast cancer patients. Radiol Oncol 45(2):116
41.
Sender R, Weiss Y, Navon Y, Milo I, Azulay N, Keren L, Milo R (2023) The total mass, number, and distribution of immune cells in the human body. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(44), e2308511120
42.
Flannagan RS, Cosío G, Grinstein S (2009) Antimicrobial mechanisms of phagocytes and bacterial evasion strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol 7(5):355–366
43.
Preston JA, Bewley MA, Marriott HM, McGarry Houghton A, Mohasin M, Jubrail J, Dockrell DH (2019) Alveolar macrophage apoptosis–associated bacterial killing helps prevent murine pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200(1):84–97
44.
Tunbridge AJ, Stevanin TM, Lee M, Marriott HM, Moir JW, Read RC, Dockrell DH (2006) Inhibition of macrophage apoptosis by Neisseria meningitidis requires nitric oxide detoxification mechanisms. Infect Immun 74(1):729–733
45.
Di Sabatino A, Rosado MM, Cazzola P, Riboni R, Biagi F, Carsetti R, Corazza GR (2006) Splenic hypofunction and the spectrum of autoimmune and malignant complications in celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(2):179–186
46.
Stotesbury H, Kawadler JM, Saunders DE, Kirkham FJ (2021) MRI detection of brain abnormality in sickle cell disease. Expert Rev Hematol 14(5):473–491
A
47.
Gravante G, Ong SL, Metcalfe MS, Sorge R, Sconocchia G, Orlando G, Dennison AR (2009), May Cytokine response to ischemia/reperfusion injury in an ex vivo perfused porcine liver model. In Transplantation proceedings (Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 1107–1112). Elsevier
A
48.
Paurević M, Šrajer Gajdošik M, Ribić R (2024) Mannose ligands for mannose receptor targeting. Int J Mol Sci 25(3):1370
Total words in MS: 5232
Total words in Title: 15
Total words in Abstract: 147
Total Keyword count: 0
Total Images in MS: 5
Total Tables in MS: 0
Total Reference count: 48