Dual-Action Compounds for Glycemic Control: N-Benzyl-2,5-Dioxopyrrolidin-3-yl-Methanesulfonamide and 2-Benzylsuccinimide mimic α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase activities to regulate blood glucose levels
ZakirUllah1
AdnanNadir1
MuhammadJunaid3
UmarNishan5
MuhammadSaeedJan4
ZiaUlHaq1
SyedUzairAliShah1
AmjadHussain6
OmerM.A.Dagah7
İhsanBoyaci8
KhaledFahmiFawy9,10
ZhiyuanWu11✉Email
SaifullahAfridi2,11,12✉EmailEmail
1
A
Department of PharmacyUniversity of Swabi KPPakistan
2Department of Emergency Care Technology, Faculty of Allied Health SciencesKohat University of Science and Technology26000KohatKPPakistan
3Department of PharmacyQuaid-i-Azam UniversityIslamabadPakistan
4Department of PharmacyBacha Khan University CharsaddaKPPakistan
5Department of ChemistryKohat University of Science and Technology26000KohatKPPakistan
6Department of Eastern MedicineUniversity of BaluchistanQuettaPakistan
7
A
College of pharmaceutical scienceSouthwest university China
8
A
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicineİstanbul Medipol UniversityİstanbulTürkiye
9Chemistry Department, Faculty of ScienceKing Khalid UniversityP.O. Box 900461413AbhaSaudi Arabia
10Research Center for Advanced Materials Science (RCAMS)King Khalid UniversityAlQura’aP.O. Box 960AbhaSaudi Arabia
11Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Joint Center for Infection and ImmunityGuangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University510623GuangzhouChina
12Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Vaccine and Drug Development Biotechnology Research GroupVPCLS, TUBİTAK Marmara Research CenterKocaeli, IstanbulTurkey
Zakir Ullah, Adnan Nadir,Muhammad Junaid3 Umar Nishan4, Muhammad Saeed Jan5, Zia Ul Haq1, Syed Uzair Ali Shah1, Amjad Hussain6, Omer M. A. Dagah7, İhsan Boyaci8, Khaled Fahmi Fawy9,10, Zhiyuan Wu11*, Saifullah Afridi2,,11,12*
1Department of Pharmacy, University of Swabi KP Pakistan
2Department of Emergency Care Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat 26000 KP Pakistan
3Department of Pharmacy, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad Pakistan5Department of Pharmacy, Bacha Khan University Charsadda, KP Pakistan
4Department of Chemistry, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat 26000 KP Pakistan
5Department of Pharmacy, Bacha Khan University Charsadda, KP Pakistan
6Department of Eastern Medicine University of Baluchistan, Quetta, Pakistan
7College of pharmaceutical science, Southwest university China
8Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Türkiye
9Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
10Research Center for Advanced Materials Science (RCAMS), King Khalid University, AlQura'a, Abha, P.O. Box 960, Saudi Arabia
11Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Joint Center for Infection and Immunity, Guangzhou Medical University, 510623, Guangzhou, China
12Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Vaccine and Drug Development Biotechnology Research Group, VPCLS, TUBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Kocaeli, Istanbul, Turkey
.______________________________________________________________________
Correspondence to:
1) Saifullah Afridi E-Mail: saifpcmd@gmail.com; saifullah.pcmd@iccs.edu
2) Zhiyuan Wu E-Mail: wuzhiyuan526@163.com
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is one of the most alarming metabolic syndromes caused by high blood sugar levels. Herein, we report the identification of two potent antidiabetic agents: N-benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-yl-methanesulfonamide (NDMS) and 2-benzylsuccinimide (2-BS). These molecules were evaluated for their antidiabetic potential using in vitro, in vivo, and in silico assays against their potential targets, α-amylase and α-glucosidase. For in vivo studies, an alloxan-induced diabetic rat model was used. Our results show that NDMS and 2-BS exhibit good in vitro enzyme inhibition compared to the standard acarbose drug. In in vivo assays, the acute toxicity profiles and IC50 values showed that NDMS at doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg/b. w. resulted in hypoglycemia with 247.9,178 mmol/L and 246.4,171 mmol/L. Similarly, 2-BS at the same dose resulted in a hypoglycemic effect by lowering blood glucose levels from 251.6 and 199 mmol/L to 244.8 and 181 mmol/L, respectively. Furthermore, their antihyperlipidemic effects revealed that these compounds also reduced total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglyceride (TG) levels, while increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. Moreover, these molecules significantly enhanced the number of pancreatic β-cells and restored normal liver morphology and serum creatinine level. Additionally, the in-silico results showed that both NDMS and 2-BS have remarkable interactions with α-amylase and α-glucosidase compared to those of the standard acarbose drug. Thus, our findings indicate that these molecules have good hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects and can be used as lead pharmacophores in the development of new antidiabetic drugs.
Keywords:
Diabetes
α-amylase
α-glucosidase
N-benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-yl-methanesulfonamide
2-benzylsuccinimide
alloxan
A
A
1) Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic complications characterized by hyperglycemia, predominantly caused by insulin synthesis or sensitization deficiency 1. Insulin and glucagon hormone levels are crucial for maintaining blood sugar levels. Relative or absolute insulin deficiency or large-scale glucagon secretion causes blood glucose abnormalities. Diabetes is generally characterized by urination, extreme thirst, significant weight loss, high blood sugar levels, and a decline in the metabolism of biomolecules, including carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids 24. Owing to autoimmune destruction of β-cells, absolute insulin deficiency leads to type 1 diabetes, whereas relative insulin secretion deficiency or its resistance to receptors, or both, cause type 2 diabetes58. Major macrovascular complications include myocardial infarction and peripheral arterial disease, whereas microvascular complications include nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy, and diabetic feet. In 2019, approximately 463 million patients with diabetes were recorded. It is projected that by 2035, the diabetic mortality figure will cross 592 million. Current antidiabetic drugs include insulin therapy, biguanides, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, meglitinides, DPP-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose transporter inhibitors 9.
One clinical approach to treating diabetes involves the inhibition of carbohydrate-metabolizing enzymes. These enzymes have a direct impact on blood glucose levels because they are crucial for the breakdown of carbohydrates into glucose. Clusters of α-amylase and α-glucosidase, α-glycosidic O-linkage-hydrolases, a common exo-type, release D-glucose from the substrate at the non-reducing end. Hydrolytic processes are caused by the breaking of the bond between the anomeric carbon of the glucosyl residue and the glycosidic oxygen (C1-O). Since they exclusively release D-glucose, α-glucosidase and α-amylase do not appear to differ from one another. However, the anomer type of product—α-glucosidase produces α-glucose and α-amylase, β-glucose—essentially distinguishes the two enzymes 10, 11.
The enzyme α-amylase is found in plants, animals, and microbes 12. These metalloenzymes require a minimum of one Ca2 + ion per molecule for complex formation and retention of morphology 13. The amino acid 496 residues that make up porcine pancreatic α-amylase are 83% similar to those of human pancreatic amylase 14. Pancreatic juice and saliva contain the enzyme α-amylase 15. The brush-border membrane of enterocytes in the intestine secretes α-glucosidase, also known as maltase, which hydrolyzes α-1,4-glucoside-bonded polysaccharides into monosaccharides that are ready for assimilation. Pancreatic α-amylase hydrolyzes the amylose α-1,4-glycosidic linkages of a starch 8, 1619.
α-Glucosidase inhibitors (acarbose, which neutralizes α-amylase, sucrose, and maltase; miglitol, which works on glucoamylase and isomaltose; and voglibose) are a new group of antidiabetic The activity of glucosidases is essential for various biological reactions, including (i) the breakdown of dietary polysaccharides to yield monosaccharide units that the body can metabolize and use, (ii) the processing of glycoproteins and catabolism of lysosome glycoconjugates, and (iii) the biosynthesis of oligosaccharide units in glycolipids or glycoproteins 20. At present, miglitol (1) (Glyset), acarbose (2) (Precose), and N-butyl-1-deoxynojirimycin (3) (Zavescae) are the three drugs relied on commercially as anti-glucosidases. Drugs 1 and 2 are prescribed to treat non-insulin-dependent type II diabetes. Drug 3 is used to treat Gaucher's disease, which is associated with disrupted lysosomal storage. In keeping with the growing interest in both natural and synthetic glucosidase inhibitors as potential beneficial medicines and crucial strategies for mastering biochemical processes 19, 2123. Thus, the inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase is necessary to control blood sugar levels.
.
.
2) Methodology
2.1. Drugs, solvents, and equipment
NDMS and 2-BS compounds were synthesized with alloxan monohydrate 98% (Chai 10G, Sigma, CAS 2244-11-3), acarbose (Alfa Aesar), yeast α-glucosidase (CAS 9001-42-7), porcine α-amylase (CAS 9000-90-2), Tween 80 (CAS 9005-65-6) (Sigma Aldrich), normal saline (Medipak Limited), creatinine Jafee (Kit Lot CF 11231JB-CentronicGmbH/Germany), GPT/ALT-LQ- (Lot-LIQ-1259 LABKIT, China), ACCU-CHEK glucose measuring kits (Roche), ethanol strips, and pricking needles. All chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade and used without further purification.
2.2. Animal
A
A
A
Healthy, 8–12 weeks Swiss albino mice were purchased from the Directorate of Veterinary Research Institute, Peshawar, and housed in sanitized polypropylene cages. Mice were housed in the animal house of the Department of Pharmacy, University of Swabi, Pakistan, and nourished under standard conditions (12 h light/dark) at 25 ± 2°C temperature 34 and 50 ± 15% relative humidity and were fed standard food (pellet diet) and water ad libitum. Upon reaching an average body weight of 35 g, the animals were inspected for in vivo experimentation. The randomized animals were adapted to the laboratory environment for ten days prior to the start of the study.
A
The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee (UOS/Pharm11), Department of Pharmacy, University of Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The Advance Academic and Research Board (ASRB), University of Swabi, approved this study (study permission no. F. NO. DA/UOS/2023/1766 dated August 01, 2023). Following the experiment, the animals were euthanized in compliance with AVMA regulations35.
2.3. Compounds chemistry
A
A
A
NDMS and 2-BS were synthesized by M.S. Jan et al. (2020) and further evaluated for their antidiabetic potential. The synthesis of the N-benzene sulfonamide derivative of pyrrolidine-2,5-dione shown in Scheme 2 (see S. Figure 1) 36. The analyzed compounds were synthesized by Michael's addition of ketones to N-substituted maleimides. A mixture of ethyl-2-oxy-cyclohexanecarboxylate (2.0 equivalents) and a catalyst (20 mol% of either 8-hydroxyquinoline or a combination of creatinine and KOH) was mixed in 1 M dichloromethane (DCM) and magnetically agitated for 3–4 min, followed by N-cyclohexylmaleimide additions to synthesize the desired molecules. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates were used to track the reaction progress (see S. Figure 2). After the reaction, the mixture was cooled and diluted with 15 mL of water. Dichloromethane (3 × 15 mL) was then used to extract the material, which was filtered and concentrated using a low-pressure rotary evaporator. Column chromatography was used to purify the crude mixture.
Fig. 1
In-vitro enzyme inhibitory effect of NMDS and 2-BS compounds: The inhibitory influence of NMDS and 2-BS compounds on α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzyme responses was determined by measuring % inhibition after 0.25 h of incubation with test molecules using acarbose as a PC (positive control). A) Shows enzyme inhibition % at a fixed 1000 µg/mL concentration. B-C) Represent dose- response curves for α-amylase (B) and α-glucosidase (C) enzyme inhibition. D) Show the chemical structure of the respective NMDS, 2-BS, and acarbose molecules. Data represent the means ± SD of three replicate experiments.
Click here to Correct
Fig. 2
In-vivoeffect profiling of NMDS and 2-BS compounds on biochemical parameters. A) The graph shows the change in body weights in the respective groups. B) Represent the serum glucose level taken at different time intervals. The graph shows liver function tests for key enzymes, including serum pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) profiling. D) shows the lipid profiling for cholesterol, triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoproteins (HDL). E) highlights the creatinine contents. Data represent the mean (n = 6) ± standard error of the mean in triplicate.
Click here to Correct
The in-depth summary begins with the combination of N-substituted maleimides with different cyclic alkyl/alkyl ketones to create ketone derivatives of pyrrolidine-2,5-dione. All reactions were straightforward, single-step processes that were completed quickly and produced good isolated yields. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a tricomponent non-covalent organocatalytic system for these reactions. N-sulfamoyl-phenylmaleic acid ([(4-sulfamoylphenyl) carbamoyl] prop-2-enoic acid) intermediate was produced in the first stage by reacting maleic anhydride with sulfanilamide in diethyl ether to form an N-substituted sulfonamide derivative. The sulfanilamide derivative was obtained by cyclizing the intermediate in acetic anhydride with sodium acetate. After reacting with the N-sulfonamide derivative, cyclohexanone and cycloheptanone were produced in the reaction mixture. Biologically screened compounds were > 95% pure, as determined by HPLC36. The physical and chemical properties of NDMS include the following: Molecular Formula: C₁₂H₁₄N₂O₄S, Molecular Weight, 282.32 g/mol; Melting Point, 160°C; Solubility: Soluble in methanol, ethanol, and DMSO Low solubility in hexane and chloroform; moderate water solubility; Appearance: White to off-white solid; and Boiling Point, 360°C. 2-Benzylsuccinimide molecular formula of C₁₁H₁₁NO₂, a Molecular Weight of 189.21 g/mol, and a Melting Point of 102°C. solubility in water is likely low, as is common for succinimide derivatives, owing to their relatively nonpolar nature. 2-BS is more soluble in polar organic solvents such as acetone, ethanol, methanol, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) because of the ability of the succinimide and benzyl groups to interact with these solvents. Appearance: white or off-white crystalline solid; boiling point: 325°C.
2.4. Toxicity
A
A
Before the administration of the compounds to lab animals, 5-2000 mg/kg/b. w., comprising 8 doses, was determined by the results of preliminary range-finding experiments from LD0-100. For every eight doses, three replicates were examined using both the positive and negative controls.
A
Oral routes were followed for each group of five mice, and after implementing the predetermined operations, the animals were closely monitored for allergic reactions, behavioral changes, and mortality rates for up to three days. The comprehensive dosage schedules and animal requirements are provided in Tables36, 37.
2.5. Invitroα-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition
2.5.1. α-amylase Inhibition assay
The α-amylase inhibition test was performed by measuring the amount of reducing sugar (maltose) generated during the assay. A decline in the amount of maltose released was used to indicate the inhibitory action of the enzyme. The maltose equivalent was calculated using a modified dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) technique. To prepare the sample solution, alpha amylase was mixed with the solvent (phosphate buffer), and various concentrations of the pre-synthesized compounds (500, 250, 125, 62.5, and 31.25 µg/ml) were mixed in this solution. A 1% w/v starch solution was then mixed after the compounds were pre-incubated with 1 U/mL α-amylase. The above solution was incubated for approximately 30 min at 37°C. After incubation, the reactant mixture was kept in a water bath for 5 min at 100°C. Instead of the amylase enzyme, equal amounts of buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer with 6.7 mM sodium chloride, pH 6.9 at 20°C) were used as a blank. After that, 1 mL of DNS reagent (12.0 g of sodium potassium tartrate tetrahydrate in 8 mL of 2 M NaOH and 96 mM 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid solution) was added to stop the reaction 38. The color intensity was measured using a microplate reader at 656 nm. The percentage of inhibition was calculated using the following formula:
% inhibition =
x100
2.5.2. α-glucosidase inhibition assay
The α-glucosidase chromogenic inhibitory assay of NDMS and 2-BS was performed using standard protocols 39, 40. Briefly, approximately 20 µL of the prepared α-glucosidase solution (0.5 U/mL) was combined with 120 µL of pH 6.9 phosphate buffer. The ultimate concentration of the enzymatic solution was 20 µL of α-glucosidase (0.5 U/mL). The substrate para-nitrophenyl–D-glucopyranoside (5 mM) was manufactured in the same buffer (pH 6.9). After preparing test samples with different concentrations ranging from 62.5 to 1000 µg/mL, they were combined with the enzyme solution and incubated for 15 min at 37°C. Finally, 80 µL of 0.2 M sodium carbonate solution was added to complete the reaction. Acarbose blank solution served as the positive control, and the system devoid of α-glucosidase served as the blank. The absorbance was recorded at 405 nm using a UV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). The experiment was repeated in triplicate, and the inhibitory activity was determined using the following equation:
% inhibition =
x100
2.6. Alloxan-induced model and blood glucose profiling
Diabetes was induced by administering intraperitoneal alloxan at 120 mg/kg/bw. w. to mice 41. Not only was the symptomatic assessment performed for polyuria and polydipsia, but the model was also evaluated by fasting blood glucose levels above 200 mg/dL for diabetes induction. The animals were grouped into normal control (nondiabetic, saline nourished), diabetic control (alloxan administered), group 3 was standardly treated with glibenclamide (0.5 mg/kg), and groups 4 and 5 were treated with oral NDMS at doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg, and 2-BS at the same dose of NDMS was administered orally to groups 6 and 7. Glucose levels were recorded regularly for up to 15 days using an Accu-Check glucometer.
2.7. Lipid profiling
A
After 15 days, blood samples were collected in heparin-coated sample tubes. Serum was isolated and processed for determination of total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and TGs 17, 42 before centrifugation at room temperature for 30 minutes at 15000 rpm. For triglyceride (TG), the separated serum was analyzed using a calorimetric machine (MicroLab 300; Q-Line Biotech Pvt. Ltd.). Yellow gel tubes (clot activators) were used for TG quantification. Approximately 1 ml of TG reagent was added to the tube and mixed with 10 µL of serum, followed by incubation for 10 min at 37°C. The tube was then processed using a machine. Similarly, for total cholesterol, the same process was repeated, but the serum was mixed with a cholesterol reagent and placed in a water bath for 10 min at 37°C. The prepared tube was placed in a MicroLab 300 (Q-Line Biotech Pvt. Ltd.) for analysis, and the readings were recorded. The levels of total cholesterol, total triglycerides, low-density lipoproteins, and high-density lipoproteins in the plasma were measured.
2.8. Liver functions profile
The same isolated plasma was used for the analysis of liver enzymes (SGPT, SGOT, and ALP). Briefly, for SGPT, SGOT, and ALP profiling, the previously separated serum (10–50 µL) was mixed in a tube with an ALT reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific Company) and subjected to calorimetric analysis. For creatinine analysis, mice blood samples (1.5 ml) in a heparin-coated sample tube already placed in the tube rack were used using the standard kit method. A blank solution was tested to check the machine function, followed by validation that the creatinine reagent fell within the acceptable reading range of ≤ 2 mg/dL. The desired blood sample was then aspirated after mixing with the reagent and waiting for 10 s using a stopwatch, followed by machine readings for further statistical analysis.
2.9. Histopathological Examination
To check the recovery of the pancreas, approximately 3–4 pancreas samples from each group were collected from the sacrificed mice for histopathological examination of the pancreas at the end of the anti-diabetic study. The study was continued for up to 4 weeks after the administration of various dosages to the respective groups. A standard histological protocol was used (IETIE). Briefly, pancreatic sections were preserved in formalin saline. Subsequently, ethanol was used to dehydrate the tissues, followed by xylene tissue cleansing at increasing concentrations. Before embedding in paraffin blocks, the tissues were impregnated with molten paraffin. Fine sectioning was followed by hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) staining, and the samples were examined under a light microscope. For histological examination of the liver, three to four mice from each group that had the greatest change in blood sugar levels were sacrificed. This was performed using a standard histological method. The liver was immediately preserved in 10% formalin for 24 h at room temperature after euthanasia. The tissues were subsequently divided into sections, placed on glass microscope slides, and fixed in paraffin. The slices (4 mm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and viewed under a light microscope.
2.10. Molecular docking
A molecular docking study was carried out using MOE (2016) software (CCG, 2016). The 3D structures of α-amylase and α-glycosidase with Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID 3BAJ and 5NN5, respectively, were obtained from the PDB database 43, 44. All water molecules were eliminated before energy minimization. Energy minimization was performed using the MMFF94 force field with a convergence criterion of 0.05. The 2D structural coordinates of the synthesized compounds, NDMS and 2-BS, were constructed and saved in a new MOE database, and the 2D structure of acarbose was obtained from the PubChem database (PubChem CID-41774). The substrate-binding site residues of α-amylase and α-glucosidase were defined for molecular docking studies. Flexibility was applied to all ligand atoms during docking to obtain the lowest-energy ligand-protein complex 45. The compounds were ranked using the GBVI/WSA dG scoring system. Finally, the protein-ligand interactions were analyzed using PyMOL v.1.7.
2.11. Statistical analysis
SigmaPlot@17 was used for all graphical and statistical analyses. A P-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant statistical difference.
.
3) Results
3.1. In-vitro α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition
NDMS and 2-BS directly blocked α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes via an enzyme inhibition assay experiment using acarbose as the reference drug (Fig. 1). NDMS showed significant inhibition of α-amylase in a dose-dependent manner of 85.49 ± 0.60, 76.28 ± 1.94, 71.08 ± 1.04, 61.37 ± 0.56, and 54.12 ± 0.52 at a concentration range of 62.5–1000 µg/mL, with an IC50 value of 49.05 µM. The 2-BS displayed percent inhibition of 77.58 ± 0.63, 716.61 ± 0.43, 60.93 ± 0.67, 53.65 ± 0.91, and 45.12 ± 0.12 at the same concentration, with an IC50 value of 95.05 µM. In comparison, acarbose had an IC50 value of 22.61 µM (Fig. 1B) 4648. The reduction in the activity of α-glucosidase by NDMS was 87.30 ± 1.42, 82.80 ± 0.41, 69.51 ± 0.59, 65.90 ± 0.32, and 61.56 ± 0.52 at a concentration range of 62.5–1000 µg/ml with an IC50 value of 30.93 µM, whereas 2-BS displayed an inhibition of 76.32 ± 0.87, 69.33 ± 0.66, 56.40 ± 0.82, 51.90 ± 0.45, and 42.34 ± 0.42 at the same dose, respectively, with an IC50 value of 120.3 µM (Fig. 1C). In comparison, acarbose has an IC50 of 23.78 µM 49.
3.2 In-vivo study of NDMS and 2-BS in alloxan-induced diabetic mice
The body weights of treated and nontreated mice were measured at different time intervals ranging from days 1 to 15, and the percent change in body weight was calculated, as shown in Fig. 2A. The data demonstrated that weight gain in diabetic mice (23.59%) was less than that in normal control mice (41.7%). Furthermore, diabetic mice treated with glibenclamide (0.5 mg/kg/b. w.) resulted in almost equivalent weight gain to that of normal control mice (47.8%). The NDMS (5 and 10 mg/kg/b.w.)-treated diabetic mice have shown a good weight gain of 50–52.3% compared to glibenclamide 41, 50. While the 2-BS (5 and 10 mg/kg/b. w.)-treated animals had a minimum effect on controlling weight loss of approximately 29–36% in diabetic mice. Thus, 2-BS is less effective in controlling weight loss in diabetic models than NDMS and glibenclamide (Fig. 2A).
Similarly, the antihyperglycemic effects of NDMS and 2-BS (5 and 10 mg/kg/b. w.) with the reference drug, glibenclamide (0.5 mg/kg/b.w.), via oral administration considerably reduced fasting blood glucose levels from days 1–15. The NDMS (5 and 10 mg/kg/b.w.)-treated Blood glucose levels (BGL) of C. sinensis-treated mice were noted as 247.9 ± 0.9, 236.1 ± 1.7, 208 ± 1.9, 187 ± 1.4, and 178 ± 1.3, respectively. While the 2-BS (5 and 10 mg/kg/b. w.)-treated mice exhibited a decreased BGL of 251.6 ± 1.4, 232.4 ± 1.5, 223 ± 1.1, 208 ± 1.7, and 199 ± 1.6 mg/dL, respectively. The noted BGL decline was significantly less than that in the diabetic control but was still higher than that in glibenclamide-treated mice (Fig. 2B).
Furthermore, liver function analysis was performed by assessing the key enzymes, including serum pyruvic transaminase (SGPT; 61.4 ± 1.5), serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT; 46.9 ± 0.8), alkaline phosphatase (ALP; 275 ± 1.1), and serum creatinine (2.8 ± 0.7) in diabetic mice. The reference drug, glibenclamide treatment, halted the liver enzymes SGPT (25.8 ± 1.8), SGOT (23.9 ± 1.5), ALP (188 + 2.5), and serum creatinine (0.5 ± 0.8), respectively. The NDMS (5 and 10 mg/kg/b.w.)-treated diabetic mice reduced the same markers up to SGPT (24–26.8 ± 1.4), SGOT (23–27.8 ± 1.5), ALP (193–182 + 1.8), and serum creatinine (0.7–0.9 ± 0.2), respectively. The reduction was significant at both doses compared to that in the diabetic control group. Similarly, 2-BS (5 and 10 mg/kg/b. w.)-treated diabetic mice reduced the SGPT (22-25.8 ± 1.2), SGOT (21-22.9 ± 1.4), ALP (187-191.4 + 1.17), and serum creatinine (0.6–0.8 ± 0.15) by respectively 47, 5153. The reduction was remarkable at both doses compared to that in the diabetic control group (Fig. 2C and E).
A
Lipid profiling studies on mice treated with NDMS and 2-BS for 15 days showed considerably reduced levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides (TGs), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and high-density lipoproteins (HDL). This outcome was proportionate to that obtained with the recommended dosage of the standard drug glibenclamide (0.5 mg/kg/b.w.) 3, 7, 8, 16. HDL cholesterol levels were also remarkably higher in mice treated with NDMS and 2-BS (Fig. 2D).
3.3. Histopathological Findings
The effects of various combinations of treatments on the structure of pancreatic β-cells were compared with those of the alloxan-induced diabetic model (control) and reference drug (positive control) groups. The cell morphology of islets in alloxan-induced diabetic control mice was altered by healing and fibrosis, which showed β-cell destruction, causing the cells to contract and deviate from their normal histological appearance (Fig. 3Ac). In the NMDS-treated (5 and 10 mg/kg/b. w.) group, a good trend of pancreatic β-cell recovery was noted compared to the reference molecules, as indicated by the red arrow in Fig. 3A1. Similarly, the diabetic model group treated with 2-BS (5 and 10 mg/kg/b. w.) also shows a better trend of pancreatic β-cell recovery, as depicted in Fig. 3A2 16. The NDMS- and 2-BS-treated groups showed significantly improved cell mass, islet cell shape, and total islet cell volume compared to the reference group (Fig. 3A).
Fig. 3
Histopathology and hepatoprotective activities of NDMS and 2-BS compounds. A) Shows overall histopathological examination of pancreas. (C) Shows alloxan-induced diabetic control mice beta cell destruction as indicated by the red arrow; (PC) shows an alloxan-induced diabetic rat treated with glibenclamide (0.5 mg/kg/b. w.) as a reference drug. (1–2) Shows an alloxan-induced diabetic rat treated with (5 mg/kg/b. w.) test samples (1) NMDS & (2) 2-BS, respectively; recovery of pancreatic beta cells compared to reference as indicated by white dashed lines and circles with red arrows. B) Shows overall hepatoprotective activities of NDMS and 2-BS compounds. The hepatoprotective activities of the desired compounds (NDMS & 2-BS) were investigated by using rat model liver histopathology HE techniques. (C). Shows Alloxan-induced diabetic control rat liver sections with hydropic degeneration and severe congestion (PC). Shows alloxan-glibenclamide-treated rat liver sections. (1–2) Shows Alloxan-induced diabetic rat livers treated with (5 mg/kg/b.w.) test samples (1) NMDS & (2) 2-BS. The apparently normal appearance of hepatic strands to referenced as indicated by white dished lines and circles with red arrows. Images of the HE-stained slides were taken at 40X.
Click here to Correct
The livers of diabetic animals after receiving alloxan injections displayed several abnormalities, including hazy edema, lymphocyte infiltration, severe congestion, necrotic foci, and hydropic changes (Fig. 3B). The hepatic portal vein was also congested in the alloxan (Diabetic Control) section from the liver of a diabetic mouse, showing hydropic degeneration (HD) and severe congestion (CO) (Fig. 3Bc) 8, 50. The NMDS and 2-BS-treated diabetic mice livers (5 and 10 mg/kg/b. w.) show a nearly similar morphology of hepatic architecture with an apparently normal appearance and good recovery (Fig. 3B1-2).
3.4. Molecular docking
To investigate the specific sites of interaction responsible for these biological activities, a docking study was performed on these keys’ pharmacophores. Docking analyses of NDMS and 2-BS revealed several possible binding interactions with the target enzymes. NDMS established a significant interaction with the binding site residues of amylase, with a dock score of 5.6607 kcal/mol, while 2-BS had a lower amylase binding affinity, with a docking score of -4.3213 kcal/mol. The docking scores of NDMS and 2-BS to α-glucosidase were 5.8803 and − 4.9448 kcal/mol 52, 54. Overall, the docking simulations of the synthetic compounds demonstrated the significant inhibitory activities of α-amylase (Table 1) and α-glucosidase (Table 2), both of which showed significant interactions with varying binding affinities toward the target proteins (Fig. 4AB).
Table 1
Docking scores and predicted interactions of α-Amylase amino acids with target compounds
Compound
Interacting
Residues
Interacting details
Distance
(Å)
Energy
(Kcal/mol)
Docking Score
(Kcal/mol)
NDMS
GLY 306 HIS201
HIS 201
H-acceptor H-acceptor
H-acceptor
3.73
3.63
2.91
-0.6
-0.5
-2.4
-5.6607
2-BS
TYR 62
H-acceptor
3.67
-0.5
-4.3213
Control (Acarbose)
HIS 305
ASP 300 GLY 306 GLY 306 HIS 299
H-donor
H-donor
H-acceptor H-acceptor
H-acceptor
2.97
2.99
3.13
3.27
2.98
-0.7
-2.6
-1.1
-0.9
-1.0
-8.2773
Table 2
Docking scores and predicted interactions of α-glucosidase amino acids with target compounds
Compound
Interacting Residues
Interaction type
Distance
(Å)
Energy
(Kcal/mol)
Docking score (Kcal/mol)
NDMS
PRO 309 HIS 239 PHE 157
H-donor
H-acceptor pi-H
2.98
3.30
4.49
-1.7
-0.2
-0.5
-5.8803
2-BS
ARG 312 PHE 157
H-acceptor pi-H
3.29
4.17
-1.1
-0.7
-4.9448
Control (Acarbose)
GLU 304 ASP 349 PHE 157 ASN 241
H-donor
H-donor
H-donor
H-acceptor
2.73
2.67
3.05
3.37
-0.8
-2.6
-1.0
-0.5
-7.7609
4) Discussion
Up until now, the FDA has approved ≥ 10 classes of diabetic drugs for diabetic therapies, including biguanides, which reduce gluconeogenesis and improve insulin peripheral sensitization 55; sulfonylureas, which increase insulin synthesis from β-cells 46; sodium-glucose co-transporters and 2 inhibitors, which enhance renal glucose elimination from the body 6. This suggests that nearly all diabetes treatments are rationalized by the post-assimilation of monosaccharides. Therefore, pre-assimilatory inhibition of glucose-based strategies must be developed. This can be overcome by changing dietary habits, such as consuming foods high in fiber and less glucose and sugar sweetener substitutes4, 56. Intestinal glucose absorption proceeds via the conversion of long-chain polysaccharides to glucose by the glucosidase enzyme. The most prominent monosaccharide-creating enzymes in the GIT are α-amylase (salivary and pancreatic) and α-glucosidase. Salivary α-amylase hydrolyzes starch at the α-(1,4) glycosidic linkages to form small oligomers. Pancreatic α-amylase reduces the size of oligomers, resulting in smaller oligosaccharides such as maltose and dextrin 16. These oligomers are transformed into dextrose by α-glucosidases, such as maltase, sucrose, and isomaltose, which are readily absorbed by the intestines. α-amylase/glucosidase inhibitors hinder gastric carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes to control postprandial hyperglycemia 8. Pharmacologic treatments require the development of new compounds to inhibit polysaccharide-hydrolyzing enzymes 51.
The one-drug, one-disease ideology is antiquated, and scientists are struggling to develop multifaceted compounds 57, 58. Pyrrolidinedione, commonly called succinimide, is reported to have pharmacologic activities 59 covering inflammation, tumors, microbes, and analgesia 60, 61and has a close resemblance to FDA-approved antidiabetic-class thiazolidinediones 62, 63. Pyrrolidinedione and its chiral derivatives have been studied for pancreas, heart, and liver diseases 54, 61. Structural activity relationships show rational derivatives of existing compounds with more potency 64. The current study aimed to investigate the antidiabetic and antilipidomic activities of sulfonamide and succinimide derivatives. Both NDMS and 2-BS positively inhibit the target enzymes, α-amylase and glucosidase 65. A toxicity profile was determined for these synthetic compounds before testing on an animal model, and they were found to be safe up to 1000 mg/kg/b. w., with acute toxicity above it. Therefore, a 1000 mg concentration was selected as the optimal dose for all assays. These compounds showed a good response in both in vitro (Fig. 1) and in vivo (Figs. 23) α-amylase/glucosidase inhibition assays using acarbose as a standard drug (Fig. 1D). NDMS exhibited significantly better activity, whereas 2-BS had comparable antidiabetic activity to that of the reference drug (PC), as shown in Fig. 13. Molecular docking (MOE) interactions of NDMS and 2-BS with target α-amylase and glucosidase enzymes also support these biological and in silico activities (Figs. 13).
5) Conclusion
In search of finding good antidiabetic molecules, our current findings show that NDMS and 2-BS compounds significantly inhibit the activities of the target α-amylase/glucosidase enzymes in vitro and show good antihyperglycemic and antihyperlipidemic effects in diabetic models in vivo. It significantly reduced blood glucose levels and diabetes-associated markers, including LFTs (SGPT, SGOT, and ALP) and serum creatinine levels. Docking of NDMS and 2-BS with the target α-amylase/glucosidase enzymes showed good and stable interactions. Thus, this finding provides good evidence to justify the pharmacological use of NDMS and 2-BS compounds in the treatment and management of various diabetic disorders.
Declarations
-Ethical Approval: This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Animal Study at the University of Swabi (study permission No. F. NO. DA/UOS/2023/1766 dated August 01, 2023)
-Consent to Participate: Not applicable
-Consent to Publish: Not applicable
-Author’s Contribution: Z. U. and A. N.: data curation and original draft writing. M. J.: Methodology and Data analysis. U. N.: Supervision, Reviewing, and Editing. M. S. J., Z. U. H., S. U. A. H., A. H., and O. M.A. D.: Writing, Data Visualization, Data draft preparation, and I.B. & Z. W. Reviewing and Editing: Z. W.: Investigation, Reviewing, and Editing. K.F.F: Funding acquisition, S.A: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Conceptualization, Reviewing, Editing and original draft finalization.
-Funding: The authors express their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this work through a research group program under grant number RGP-2/630/45. Additionally, this study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Grant No. 31850410479.
-Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this study.
-Availability of data and materials
All data generated and analyzed are included in the submitted manuscript and Supplementary Materials.
Acknowledgement
The authors express their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia, for this work through a research group program under grant number RGP-2/630/45.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material
A
Author Contribution
Z. U. and A. N.: data curation and original draft writing. M. J.: Methodology and Data analysis. U. N.: Supervision, Reviewing, and Editing. M. S. J., Z. U. H., S. U. A. H., A. H., and O. M.A. D.: Writing, Data Visualization, Data draft preparation, and I.B. & Z. W. Reviewing and Editing: Z. W.: Investigation, Reviewing, and Editing. K.F.F: Funding acquisition, S.A: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Conceptualization, Reviewing, Editing and original draft finalization.
References
1.
Issue Information (2019) Diab/Metab Res Rev 35
2.
de Oliveira Neto XA, Barssotti L, Fiori-Duarte AT, de Lima Barbosa HC, Kawano DF (2023) Entering the sugar rush era: revisiting the antihyperglycemic activities of biguanides after a century of metformin discovery. Curr Med Chem 30(22):2542–2561
3.
Khalil AW, Iqbal Z, Adhikari A, Khan H, Nishan U, Iqbal A, Bangash JA, Tarar OM, Bilal A, Khan SAJSAPAM, Spectroscopy B (2024) Spectroscopic characterization of eupalitin-3-O-β-D-galactopyranoside from Boerhavia procumbens: In-vivohepato-protective potential in rat model. 304:123369
4.
Radenkovic S (2023) Investigating the effects of artificial sweeteners. Nat Reviews Endocrinol 1–1
5.
Song G, Shi Y, Zhang M, Goswami S, Afridi S, Meng L, Ma J, Chen Y, Lin Y, Zhang JJC (2020) d., Global immune characterization of HBV/HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma identifies macrophage and T-cell subsets associated with disease progression. 6 (1), 90
6.
Song J, Li X, Ni J (2023) A Role for Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Mini Review. Kidney Blood Press Res 48(1):599–610
7.
Tuck MK, Chan DW, Chia D, Godwin AK, Grizzle WE, Krueger KE, Rom W, Sanda M, Sorbara L, Stass S, Wang W, Brenner DE (2009) Standard operating procedures for serum and plasma collection: early detection research network consensus statement standard operating procedure integration working group. J Proteome Res 8(1):113–117
8.
Vermeire EI, Wens J, Van Royen P, Biot Y, Hearnshaw H, Lindenmeyer A (2005) Interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2)
9.
Chaudhury A, Duvoor C, Reddy Dendi VS, Kraleti S, Chada A, Ravilla R, Marco A, Shekhawat NS, Montales MT, Kuriakose K Clinical review of antidiabetic drugs: implications for type 2 diabetes mellitus management. Front Endocrinol 2017,8, 6
10.
Hua X, Yang R (2016) Enzymes in starch processing. Enzymes food beverage Process 139–170
11.
Chiba S (1997) Molecular mechanism in α-glucosidase and glucoamylase. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 61(8):1233–1239
12.
Anitha Gopal B, Muralikrishna G (2009) Porcine pancreatic α-amylase and its isoforms: Purification and kinetic studies. Int J Food Prop 12(3):571–586
13.
Khadayat K, Marasini BP, Gautam H, Ghaju S, Parajuli N (2020) Evaluation of the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity of Nepalese medicinal plants used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Clin Phytoscience 6:1–8
14.
Zhang X (2016) Binding of substrates and inhibitors to human pancreatic alpha amylase. University of British Columbia
15.
Kazeem M, Adamson J, Ogunwande I (2013) Modes of inhibition of α-amylase and α‐glucosidase by aqueous extract of Morinda lucida Benth leaf. Biomed Res Int 2013(1):527570
16.
Sadiq A, Rashid U, Ahmad S, Zahoor M, AlAjmi MF, Ullah R, Noman OM, Ullah F, Ayaz M, Khan I (2020) Treating hyperglycemia from Eryngium caeruleum M. Bieb: In-vitro α-glucosidase, antioxidant, in-vivo antidiabetic and molecular docking-based approaches. Front Chem 8:558641
17.
Ouchi G, Komiya I, Taira S, Wakugami T, Ohya Y (2022) Triglyceride/low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is the most valuable predictor for increased small, dense LDL in type 2 diabetes patients. Lipids Health Dis 21(1):4
18.
Rasheed W, Shah MR, Kazmi MH, Shah K, Afridi SJN (2016) J. o. C., Sterically stabilized fluorescent silver nanoconjugates for optical discrimination of Cu (ii) in real samples and in-vitro bioimaging of the Cu (ii) scavenging process in human lymphocytes by atomic force microscopy. 40(6):5546–5554
19.
Zaraei S-O, El-Gamal MI, Shafique Z, Amjad ST, Afridi S, Zaib S, Anbar HS, El-Gamal R, Iqbal JJB, Chemistry M (2019) Sulfonate and sulfamate derivatives possessing benzofuran or benzothiophene nucleus as potent carbonic anhydrase II/IX/XII inhibitors. 27(17):3889–3901
20.
Mostafa S, El Naby A, Zidan E (2014) Activity level of lactate dehydrogenase and β-glucosidase enzymes in the honeybee colonies,(Apis Mellifera L.) with Different Feeding. Int J Agric Technol 10(2):483–491
21.
Bailey C (2003) New approaches to the pharmacotherapy of diabetes. Textbook diabetes 2, 73.1-73.21.
22.
de Melo EB, da Silveira Gomes A, Carvalho I (2006), α-and β-Glucosidase inhibitors: chemical structure and biological activity. Tetrahedron 62(44):10277–10302
23.
Nishan U, Rehman S, Ullah R, Bari A, Afridi S, Shah M, Iqbal J, Asad M, Badshah A, Khan NJF (2023) i. M., Fabrication of a colorimetric sensor using acetic acid-capped drug-mediated copper oxide nanoparticles for nitrite biosensing in processed food. 10:1169945
24.
Sarfraz M, Sultana N, Rashid U, Akram MS, Sadiq A, Tariq MI (2017) Synthesis, biological evaluation and docking studies of 2, 3-dihydroquinazolin-4 (1H)-one derivatives as inhibitors of cholinesterases. Bioorg Chem 70:237–244
A
25.
Bhat AA, Tandon N, Tandon R (2022) Pyrrolidine Derivatives as Anti-diabetic Agents: Current Status and Future Prospects. ChemistrySelect 7 (6), e202103757
A
26.
Singh R, Kumar P, Devi M, Kumar A, Langyan R, Lal S (2024) Other medicinal applications. In Spirooxindole, Elsevier: ; pp 503–520
A
27.
Hesse S (2023) Synthesis of 5-arylidenerhodanines in L-proline-based deep eutectic solvent. Beilstein J Org Chem 19(1):1537–1544
A
28.
Li Petri G, Raimondi MV, Spanò V, Holl R, Barraja P, Montalbano A (2021) Pyrrolidine in drug discovery: a versatile scaffold for novel biologically active compounds. Top Curr Chem 379:1–46
A
29.
Sadawarte GP, Rajput JD, Kale AD, Jagrut VB (2024) Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Five-and Six-Membered Heterocycles as an Anti-Diabetic Agent: An Overview. J Chem Reviews 331–352
30.
Toumi A, Boudriga S, Hamden K, Sobeh M, Cheurfa M, Askri M, Knorr M, Strohmann C, Brieger L (2021) Synthesis, antidiabetic activity and molecular docking study of rhodanine-substitued spirooxindole pyrrolidine derivatives as novel α-amylase inhibitors. Bioorg Chem 106:104507
A
31.
Salve MT, Jadhav SB (2021) Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of in-vitro Antidiabetic Activity of Novel Pyrrolidine Sulphonamide Derivative. Int J Pharm Invest 11 (4)
A
32.
dos Santos Maia M, Rodrigues GCS, de Sousa NF, Scotti MT, Scotti L, Mendonça-Junior FJB (2020) Identification of new targets and the virtual screening of lignans against Alzheimer’s disease. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2020 (1), 3098673
A
33.
Tukaram SM, Shailaja J (2023) Synthesis of Cyclopyrrolidine Clubbed with Oxadiazole Bases and Evaluation of their Anti-Diabetic Activity through in-vivoModel. Ind J Pharm Edu Res 57(3s):s749–s757
34.
Zhou C, Bai J, Zhang F, Zhang R, Zhang X, Zhong K, Yan B (2023) Development of mussel-inspired chitosan-derived edible coating for fruit preservation. Carbohydr Polym 321:121293
35.
Leary S, Underwood W, Anthony R, Corey D, Grandin T, Gwaltney-Brant S, Smith S (2016) AVMA guidelines for the humane slaughter of animals: 2016 edition. Association AVM, editor.: AVMA 64
36.
Jan MS, Ahmad S, Hussain F, Ahmad A, Mahmood F, Rashid U, Ullah F, Ayaz M, Sadiq A (2020) Design, synthesis, in-vitro, in-vivo and in-silico studies of pyrrolidine-2, 5-dione derivatives as multitarget anti-inflammatory agents. Eur J Med Chem 186:111863
37.
Mahmood F, Khan JA, Mahnashi MH, Jan MS, Javed MA, Rashid U, Sadiq A, Hassan SS u.;, Bungau S (2022) Anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antioxidant potential of new (2 S, 3 S)-2-(4-isopropylbenzyl)-2-methyl-4-nitro-3-phenylbutanals and their Corresponding carboxylic acids through in-vitro, in silico and in-vivostudies. Molecules 27(13):4068
38.
Bhutkar M, Bhise S (2012) In-vitro assay of alpha amylase inhibitory activity of some indigenous plants. Int J Chem Sci 10(1):457–462
39.
Alqahtani YS (2021) Bioactive stigmastadienone from Isodon rugosus as potential anticholinesterase, α-glucosidase and COX/LOX inhibitor: In-vitro and molecular docking studies. Steroids 172:108857
40.
Lankatillake C, Luo S, Flavel M, Lenon GB, Gill H, Huynh T, Dias DA (2021) Screening natural product extracts for potential enzyme inhibitors: Protocols, and the standardisation of the usage of blanks in α-amylase, α-glucosidase and lipase assays. Plant Methods 17:1–19
41.
Misra M, Aiman U (2012) Alloxan: an unpredictable drug for diabetes induction? Indian J Pharmacol 44(4):538–539
42.
Hirano T, Kodera R, Hirashima T, Suzuki N, Aoki E, Hosoya M, Oshima T, Hayashi T, Koba S, Ohta M (2022) Metabolic properties of lowdensity lipoprotein (ldl) triglycerides in patients with type 2 Diabetes, Comparison with Small Dense LDL-Cholesterol. J Atheroscler Thromb 29(5):762–774
43.
Viola; Muhammad N, Noor A, Sirajuddin M, Kubicki M, Rahim S, Samad A, Shujah S, Wadood A, Ali S (2023) Designing and Exploration of the Biological Potentials of Novel Centrosymmetric Heteroleptic Copper (II) Carboxylates. Pharmaceuticals 16 (10), 1462
44.
Etsassala NG, Badmus JA, Marnewick JL, Egieyeh S, Iwuoha EI, Nchu F, Hussein AA (2022) Alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase inhibitory activities, molecular docking, and antioxidant capacities of Plectranthus ecklonii constituents. Antioxidants 11(2):378
A
45.
Samad A, Khurshid B, Mahmood A, Rehman AU, Khalid A, Abdalla AN, Algarni AS, Wadood A (2023) Identification of novel peptide inhibitors for oncogenic KRAS G12D as therapeutic options using mutagenesis-based remodeling and MD simulations. J Biomol Struct Dynamics 41(22):13425–13437
46.
Rabiei M, Kalhor N, Farhadi A, Ramezanpour S, Tahamtani Y, Azarnia M (2023) Synthetic Small Molecules Induce Insulin Secretion and Pancreatic Beta-Cell-Specific Gene Expression. Cells Tissues Organs 212(3):220–231
47.
Sharma N, Kar A, Panda S, Yadav D (2022) Co-administration of Pterocarpus marsupium extract and Glibenclamide exhibits better effects in regulating hyperglycemia and associated changes in Alloxan-induced diabetic mice. Curr Top Med Chem 22(32):2617–2628
48.
Altay M (2022) J. W. j. o. d. Acarbose is again stage 13(1):1
49.
Damsud T, Tongwijit S, Jitkamnueng VJBSJ (2021) α-Amylaseandα-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activities of Selected Herbs and Their Synergistic Effects with Acarbose for Primary Health Care as Flatulence Inhibitory Treatments. 1016–1028
50.
Sheriff OL, Olayemi O, Taofeeq AO, Riskat KE, Ojochebo DE, Ibukunoluwa AO (2019) A New model for Alloxan-induced diabetes mellitus in rats. J Bangladesh Soc Physiologist 14(2):56–62
51.
Mai TT, Phan M-H, Thai TT, Lam T-P, Lai NV-T, Nguyen T-T, Nguyen T-V-P, Vo C-VT, Thai K-M, Tran T-D (2023) Discovery of novel flavonoid derivatives as potential dual inhibitors against α-glucosidase and α-amylase: virtual screening, synthesis, and biological evaluation. Mol Diversity 1–22
52.
Nair SS, Kavrekar V, Mishra A In-vitro studies on alpha amylase and alpha glucosidase inhibitory activities of selected plant extracts. Eur J experimental biology 2013,3 (1), 128–132
53.
Nishan U, Jabeen N, Badshah A, Muhammad N, Shah M, Ullah I, Afridi S, Iqbal J, Asad M, Ullah RJF i. B.;, Biotechnology (2024) Nanozyme-based sensing of dopamine using cobalt-doped hydroxyapatite nanocomposite from waste bones. 12, 1364700
54.
Qayyum MI, Ullah S, Rashid U, Sadiq A, Obaidullah; Mahnashi MH, Alshehri OM, Jalal MM, Alzahrani KJ, Halawani IF (2022) Synthesis, Molecular Docking, and Preclinical Evaluation of a New Succinimide Derivative for Cardioprotective, Hepatoprotective and Lipid-Lowering Effects. Molecules 27(19):6199
55.
Bjornstad P, Schäfer M, Truong U, Cree-Green M, Pyle L, Baumgartner A, Garcia Reyes Y, Maniatis A, Nayak S, Wadwa RP (2018) Metformin improves insulin sensitivity and vascular health in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus: randomized controlled trial. Circulation 138(25):2895–2907
56.
Bulsiewicz WJ (2023) The importance of dietary fiber for metabolic health. Am J Lifestyle Med 15598276231167778
57.
Javed MA, Jan MS, Shbeer AM, Al-Ghorbani M, Rauf A, Wilairatana P, Mannan A, Sadiq A, Farooq U, Rashid U (2023) Evaluation of pyrimidine/pyrrolidine-sertraline based hybrids as multitarget anti-Alzheimer agents: In-vitro, in-vivo, and computational studies. Biomed Pharmacother 159:114239
58.
Nugent TC, Bibi A, Sadiq A, Shoaib M, Umar MN, Tehrani FN (2012) Chiral picolylamines for Michael and aldol reactions: probing substrate boundaries. Org Biomol Chem 10(46):9287–9294
59.
Bibi A, Shah T, Sadiq A, Khalid N, Ullah F, Iqbal A (2019) L-isoleucine-catalyzed michael synthesis of N-alkylsuccinimide derivatives and their antioxidant activity assessment. Russ J Org Chem 55:1749–1754
60.
Qayyum MI, Ullah S, Rashid U, Mahnashi MH, Alshahrani MM, Al Ali A, Asiri A, Al Awadh AA, Alshehri OM, Sadiq A (2023) Design, synthesis and preclinical evaluations of (s)-2-((s)-1-benzyl-2, 5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-yl)-3-(4-isopropylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal (succ-5) as cardioprotective, hepatoprotective and lipid lowering molecule. in-vivo and in-silico approaches. Arab J Chem 16(2):104504
61.
Ahmad A, Ullah F, Sadiq A, Ayaz M, Saeed Jan M, Shahid M, Wadood A, Mahmood F, Rashid U, Ullah R (2020) Comparative cholinesterase, α-glucosidase inhibitory, antioxidant, molecular docking, and kinetic studies on potent succinimide derivatives. Drug Des Devel Ther 2165–2178
62.
Sadiq A, Nugent TC (2020) Catalytic access to succinimide products containing stereogenic quaternary carbons. ChemistrySelect 5(38):11934–11938
63.
Hussain F, Khan Z, Jan MS, Ahmad S, Ahmad A, Rashid U, Ullah F, Ayaz M, Sadiq A, Synthesis (2019) -vitro α-glucosidase inhibition, antioxidant, in-vivo antidiabetic and molecular docking studies of pyrrolidine-2, 5-dione and thiazolidine-2, 4-dione derivatives. Bioorg Chem 91:103128
64.
Miethke M, Pieroni M, Weber T, Brönstrup M, Hammann P, Halby L, Arimondo PB, Glaser P, Aigle B, Bode HB (2021) Towards the sustainable discovery and development of new antibiotics. Nat Reviews Chem 5(10):726–749
65.
Genovese M, Nesi I, Caselli A, Paoli P (2021) Natural α-glucosidase and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors: A source of scaffold molecules for synthesis of new multitarget antidiabetic drugs. Molecules 26(16):4818
Figures Legends
List of Figures
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3
Figure 4
A
Fig. 4
Molecular docking of NDMS and 2-BS compounds with respective enzymes A) Represent the predictive docking poses of NDMS (a), 2-BS (b), and acarbose (c) inside the active site of the respective enzyme, α-amylase. B) Represent the predictive docking poses of NDMS (d), 2-BS (e), and acarbose (f) inside the active site of the respective enzyme, α-glucosidase. Hydrogen bonds (green) were represented in dashed lines.
Click here to Correct
List of Tables
Total words in MS: 5079
Total words in Title: 18
Total words in Abstract: 239
Total Keyword count: 6
Total Images in MS: 4
Total Tables in MS: 2
Total Reference count: 65