All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and its later amendments.
The approval covered the design, distribution, and analysis of anonymous questionnaires regarding users’ experiences with Minnan nursery rhymes on digital platforms.
The questionnaire and consent procedures were approved as part of the ethics review.
This research was supported by the 2024 Fujian Provincial Social Science Foundation, under the project titled “Digital Dissemination and Optimization of Minnan Nursery Rhymes Based on Narrative Theory” ( No. FJ2024B177)
References
1.Blake J (2006) Commentary on the 2003 UNESCO Convention on the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Institute of Art and Law.(book
2.UNESCO (2021) Textes fondamentaux de la Convention pour la sauvegarde du patrimoine culturel immatériel (2003) [PDF]. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/core/v2/pdf/unescopublique/textes-fondamentaux-convention-patrimoine-culturel-immateriel-2003.pdf
3.Zhao L, Kim J (2021) The impact of traditional Chinese paper-cutting in digital protection for intangible cultural heritage under virtual reality technology. Heliyon 30(3):245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38073
4.Liu Y, Cheng P, Li J (2023) Application interface design of Chongqing intangible cultural heritage based on deep learning. Heliyon, 9(e22242). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22242
5.De Paolis LT, Chiarello S, Gatto C, Liaci S, De Luca V (2022) Virtual reality for the enhancement of cultural tangible and intangible heritage: The case study of the Castle of Corsano. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. e00238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2022.e00238
6.Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
7.Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci 39(2):273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
8.Ott M, Dagnino FM, Pozzi F (2014) Intangible Cultural Heritage: Towards collaborative planning of educational interventions. Comput Hum Behav 39:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.039
9.Liu Z (2025) The construction of a digital dissemination platform for the intangible cultural heritage using convolutional neural network models. Heliyon, 11(e40986). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40986
10.Sundar SS, Limperos AM (2013) Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. J Broadcast Electron Media 57(4):504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
11.Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 53(1):59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
12.Tamborrino R, Patti E, Aliberti A, Dinler M, Orlando M, de Luca C, Tondelli S, Barrientos F, Martin J, Cunha LFM, Stam A, Nales A, Egusquiza A, Amirzada Z, Pavlova I (2022) A resources ecosystem for digital and heritage-led holistic knowledge in rural regeneration. J Cult Herit 57:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.09.012
13.Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B (eds) (2021) Recommender systems handbook (3rd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4
14.Zhang Y (2024) The impact of short videos on the creation and dissemination of intangible cultural heritage. Commun Humanit Res. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/32/20240034
15.Zheng S (2023) Safeguarding food heritage through social media? Between heritagization and commercialization. Int J Gastronomy Food Sci 31:100678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2023.100678
16.Zheng Z, Hu X (2024) A comparative study of visual culture in tourism apps. Human Factors in Design. Retrieved from https://openaccess.cms-conferences.org/publications/book/978-1-964867-35-9/article/978-1-964867-35-9_68
17.Zhou Y (2024) Research on the traditional cultural marketing strategy of the mobile game Game for Peace. Journal of Asia Social Science. Retrieved from https://scholar.kyobobook.co.kr/article/detail/4010070197230
18.Sangamuang S, Wongwan N, Intawong K, Khanchai S (2025) Gamification in virtual reality museums: Effects on hedonic and eudaimonic experiences in cultural heritage learning. Informatics 12(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12010027
19.Lin HCK, Lu LW, Lu RS (2024) Integrating Digital Technologies and Alternate Reality Games for Sustainable Education: Enhancing Cultural Heritage Awareness and Learning Engagement. Sustainability 16(21):9451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219451
20.Zhang Y (2023) Exploring the influence of cultural identity on tourists' behavioral intention of environmentally responsibility. Adv Econ Manage Res. https://doi.org/10.56028/aemr.8.1.9.2023
21.Lyu Z, Bakhir NM, Ouyang S (2023) The relationship between user perceived value and use intention of digital cultural heritage collection apps: An empirical study from China. Int J Acad Res Bus Social Sci. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i6/17249
22.Gordillo A, Barra E, Aguirre S, Quemada J The usefulness of usability and user experience evaluation methods on an e-learning platform development from a developer's perspective: A case study. 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Proceedings (2014) 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044340
23.Du J, Lei Y (2022) Information design of matching platforms when user preferences are bidimensional. Prod Oper Manage 31(8):3320–3336. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13753
24.Radu A, Stoica I, Preda A-L, Nedelcu A (2020) Quantitative study on the usefulness of mobile learning platforms in organisations. Int J Acad Res Progressive Educ Dev. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v9-i2/7712
25.Wang J, Zhang R (2022) Research on the influencing factors of the user information cocoon effect of short video platforms based on personalized recommendation algorithms. 2022 2nd International Conference on Big Data Engineering and Education (BDEE), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/BDEE55929.2022.00016
26.Ciasullo M, Troisi O, Cosimato S (2018) How digital platforms can trigger cultural value co-creation?—A proposed model. J Service Sci Manage 11(2):161–181. https://doi.org/10.4236/JSSM.2018.112013
27.Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B (2022) Recommender systems: Techniques, applications, and challenges. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, & B. Shapira (Eds.), Recommender systems handbook (3rd ed., pp. 1–35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4_1
28.Li Z, Xu Z (2024) Analysis and optimization of recommendation mechanism and content creation in social media platform: A case study of TikTok tourism short videos. SHS Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419903015
29.Li N, Pan Y, Gao C, Jin D, Liao Q (2024) Full-stage diversified recommendation: Large-scale online experiments in short-video platform. Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589334.3648144
30.Domínguez Vila T, Darcy S (2024) Beyond technical website compliance: Identifying and assessing accessible tourism value chain information content on national tourism organisation websites. Tourism Manage Perspect 55:101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101332
31.Zhang Y, Zhang X (2024) The impact of online interaction and information technology accessibility on academic engagement among international undergraduate students in Chinese universities: The mediating effect of learning interest. Acta Psychol 249:104478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104478
32.Matausch K, Peböck B, Pühretmair F (2014) Accessible Web Content: A Noble Desire or A Need? *Procedia Computer Science, 27*, 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.034
33.Shi M, Wang Q, Long Y (2023) Exploring the key drivers of user continuance intention to use digital museums: Evidence from China’s Sanxingdui Museum. IEEE Access 11:81511–81526. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3297501
34.Jameel AS, Karem M, Aldulaimi S, Muttar A, Ahmad A (2021) The acceptance of E-learning service in a higher education context. Proceedings of International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82616-1_23
35.Mensah IK (2020) Perceived usefulness and ease of use of mobile government services: The moderating impact of electronic word of mouth (eWOM). Int J Technol Diffus 11(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtd.2020010101
36.Sorkun MF, Yurt O, Hsuan J (2022) Service modularity in e-learning programs: An analysis from the perceived usefulness perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manage. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-09-2021-0598
37.Aurangzeb W, Kashan S, Rehman ZU (2024) Investigating technology perceptions among secondary school teachers: A systematic literature review on perceived usefulness and ease of use. Acad Educ Social Sci Rev. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i2.746
38.Alalwan AA, Dwivedi YK, Rana NP, Algharabat R (2017) Examining factors influencing Jordanian customers’ intentions and adoption of internet banking: Extending UTAUT2 with risk. J Retailing Consumer Serv 39:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.026
39.Wiardi AH, Murni T, Hayu RS, Hadi E (2022) Behavioral intention to re-use online learning platform. J Health Behav Sci. https://doi.org/10.35508/jhbs.v4i1.4781
40.Restianto YE, Suliyanto S, Naufalin LR, Krisnaresanti A, Dinanti A, Iskandar D, Sugiyono S (2024) User experience and behavioral intention to use e-commerce: A study of digital literacy as a moderating variable. J Gov Regul. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv13i1art1
41.Zain ZS, Christian TF (2023) The influence of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) theory on intention to reuse mobile banking with customer satisfaction as intervening variable (Case study of BRIMO application in workers PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Kantor Wilayah Surabaya). Int J Rev Manage Bus Entrepreneurship (RMBE). https://doi.org/10.37715/rmbe.v3i1.4233
42.Berbar S (2023) User experience and technology adoption: The mediating effect of perceived ease of use on senso-aesthetic openness and behaviour intention. 2023 17th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS61268.2023.00016
43.Moya M, Nakalema SE, Nansamba C (2018) Behavioral intention: Mediator of effort expectancy and actual system usage. African Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 123–139. https://consensus.app/papers/behavioural-intention-mediator-of-effort-expectancy-and-moya-nakalema/b82f58d7946752d882140ddad2c3e3dd/?utm_source=chatgpt
44.Chaveesuk S, Khalid B, Chaiyasoonthorn W (2021) Digital payment system innovations: A marketing perspective on intention and actual use in the retail sector. Innovative Mark 17(3):114–127. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.09
45.Wang M, Sun L, Hou J (2021) How emotional interaction affects purchase intention in social commerce: The role of perceived usefulness and product type. Psychol Res Behav Manage 14:467–481. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S301286
46.Hai L, Sang G, Wang H, Li W, Bao X (2022) An empirical investigation of university students’ behavioral intention to adopt online learning: Evidence from China. Behav Sci 12(10):403. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12100403
47.Adityo W, Maharani A (2020) The effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on the technology acceptance model to use online travel agency. J Bone Miner Res 1(5):313–328. https://doi.org/10.47153/jbmr15.502020
48.Zhang Y, Jahng S (2024) Within the ecology of communication: Identifying crucial elements that drive use intentions on knowledge-sharing platforms. Sage Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241288735
49.Chen Y, Zhu W (2022) Research on customer relational bonds, affective commitment and payment intention for online education platform of traditional culture: Based on the moderation of cultural identity. SHS Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202215101027
50.Zhang Y (2023) Exploring the influence of cultural identity on tourists' behavioral intention of environmental responsibility. Adv Econ Manage Res. https://doi.org/10.56028/aemr.8.1.9.2023
51.Echesony G (2024) Impact of social media on cultural identity in urban youth. Am J Arts Social Humanity Stud. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajashs.2354
52.Hui L (2012) The multicultural value of Minnan nursery rhymes and their contemporary inheritance. Fujian Tribune (Human Social Science) 12:125–128
53.Chen F (2022) Differentiation of Nursery Rhymes, Children's Songs, and Prophetic Rhymes, and the Characteristics of Minnan Nursery Rhymes. *Journal of Jimei University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)*, 25(01), 32–36 + 86
54.Chen F (2016) Protection and Inheritance of Minnan Nursery Rhymes from the Perspective of Minnan-Taiwan Common Origins. J Jimei Univ (Philosophy Social Sci Edition) 19(04):9–13
55.Network CICH (2008) List of representative items of national intangible cultural heritage. Retrieved from https://www.ihchina.cn/project.html
56.Chen C (2021) Research on Children's Picture Book Design Based on Mobile Augmented Reality Technology: A Case Study of Minnan Nursery Rhyme Picture Books. Publishing Wide Angle 04:83–85. 10.16491/j.cnki.cn45-1216/g2.2021.04.025
57.Wu H, Zhang L, Huang Z, Chen Z, Yang W, Tong X, Shen Y (2024) Unraveling Minnan imagery: A comprehensive analysis of traditional and modern Minnan nursery rhymes through complex networks. Herit Sci 12:180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01300-7
58.Brislin RW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In: Triandis HC, Berry JW (eds) Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol 2. Allyn & Bacon, pp 389–444
59.Perneger TV, Courvoisier DS, Hudelson PM, Gayet-Ageron A (2015) Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires. Qual Life Res 24(1):147–151
60.Polit DF, Beck CT (2006) The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 29(5):489–497
61.Tang L (2019) Factors influencing users' continuous usage intention of mobile video live streaming platforms—A perspective based on user experience. J Wuhan Univ (Information Sci Edition) 44(5):711–719
62.Ricci F et al (2021) Recommender Systems Handbook (3rd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4
63.Xia B, Zhao R (2016) Analysis of factors influencing users' technology acceptance in information service activities. Social Sci 5(3):381–388
64.Hueluer G, Luo M, Macdonald B, Grünjes C (2022) Perceived quality of daily social interactions: The role of interaction modality. Innov Aging 6(5):5
65.Chen B (2024) Research on the dissemination, current situation and path of intangible cultural heritage under the background of digitalization. Int J Social Sci Public Adm. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v4n2.27
66.Buckingham S, Schroeder TU, Hutchinson JR (2023) Knowing who you are (becoming): Effects of a university-based elder-led cultural identity program on Alaska Native students' identity development, cultural strengths, sense of community, and behavioral health. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
67.Malhan M, Dewani P, Nigam A, Vaz D, Ogbeibu EA (2021) Exploring customer engagement on social networking sites: A qualitative research enquiry. J Global Inform Manage 30:1–28
68.Salazar-Frías D, Funes M, Merchán-Baeza J, Ricchetti G, Torralba-Muñoz JM (2023) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the 10-item Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in Spanish-speaking ABI patients: a multicenter study. Front Psychol 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1018055
69.Kayaduman H (2021) Student interactions in a flipped classroom-based undergraduate engineering statistics course. Comput Appl Eng Educ 29(4):969–978. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22239
70.Yu D, Lin S, Wang Y, Liu D, Liang J (2023) Multicultural heritage of Min-Taiwan King-sending Boat in the digital age. J Intell Knowl Eng. https://doi.org/10.62517/jike.202304217
71.Nyimbili F, Nyimbili L (2024) Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies
72.Jobst LJ, Bader M, Moshagen M (2021) A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sample size for structural equation models. Psychol Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000423
73.Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th edn. Guilford
74.Hayes AF (2012) PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling
A
75.Siraj-Ud-Doulah M (2021) An alternative measures of moments skewness kurtosis and JB test of normality. J Stat Theory Appl. https://doi.org/10.2991/JSTA.D.210525.002
76.Sathyanarayana S, Mohanasundaram T (2024) Fit indices in structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis: Reporting guidelines. Asian J Econ Bus Acc. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i71430
77.Gegenfurtner A (2022) Bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling: A meta-analytic review of model fit. Front Psychol 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037111
78.Peugh J, Litson K, Feldon DF (2023) Equivalence testing to judge model fit: A Monte Carlo simulation. Psychol Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000591
79.Bae Y, Yeom H (2022) Structural equation modeling of person-centered nursing in hospital nurses. Healthcare 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030514
80.Afthanorhan A, Ghazali P, Rashid N (2021) Discriminant validity: A comparison of CBSEM and consistent PLS using Fornell & Larcker and HTMT approaches. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1874. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012085
81.Susilo RD, Daniawan B, Wijaya A, Suwitno S (2021) The acceptance study of e-commerce customers based on TAM. bit-Tech. https://doi.org/10.32877/BT.V3I3.165
82.Balaman F, Baş M (2021) Perception of using e-learning platforms in the scope of the technology acceptance model (TAM): A scale development study. Interact Learn Environ 31:5395–5419. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2007136
83.Matausch K, Peböck B, Pühretmair F (2014) Accessible Web Content: A Noble Desire or A Need? *Procedia Computer Science, 27*, 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.034
84.Du L, Lv B (2024) Factors influencing students' acceptance and use generative artificial intelligence in elementary education: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Educ Inform Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12835-4
85.Fan C (2023) English learning motivation with TAM: Undergraduates’ behavioral intention to use Chinese indigenous social media platforms for English learning. Cogent Social Sci 9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2260566
86.Songkram NI, Chai SCT, Osuwan HHP, Chuppunnarat Y, Songkram NT (2023) Students' adoption towards behavioral intention of digital learning platform. Education and Information Technologies, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11637-4
87.Zhang K, Yu Z (2022) Extending the UTAUT model of gamified English vocabulary applications by adding new personality constructs. Sustainability 14(10):6259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106259
88.Kamal S, Safarida N, Kassim E (2024) Investigating the role of fiqh zakat knowledge in moderating the behaviour of the Acehnese to pay zakat digitally. J Islamic Mark. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-02-2023-0055
89.Wijaya T, Zhou Y, Houghton T, Weinhandl R, Lavicza Z, Yusop F (2022) Factors affecting the use of digital mathematics textbooks in Indonesia. Mathematics 10(11):1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10111808
90.Zhang Y, Guo W, Su J, Lv P, Xu M (2023) BIP-Tree: Tree variant with behavioral intention perception for heterogeneous trajectory prediction. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 24:9584–9598. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2023.3271953
91.Zhu L, Pang T (2022) Research on digital platform technology of intangible cultural heritage in Beijing section of Great Wall Cultural Belt. 2022 International Conference on Culture-Oriented Science and Technology (CoST), 426–430. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoST57098.2022.00093
92.Yi Y (2023) Negotiating performance between policy and platform — heritage practice of a Chinese craftsperson on Douyin (TikTok). Int J Herit Stud 29:1089–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2237495
93.Mathioudakis G, Klironomos I, Partarakis N, Papadaki E, Volakakis K, Anifantis N, Papageorgiou I (2022) InCulture: A collaborative platform for intangible cultural heritage narratives. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5040149. Heritage
94.Kang X, Li X-Z, Chen C-C (2023) An acceptance model of digital education in intangible cultural heritage based on cultural awareness. Digit Creativity 34:331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2023.2280028
95.He Y, Chen X, Wang L (2023) How digital events promote intangible cultural heritage? A user experience perspective. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.916
96.Yang J, Xu C (2024) Digital enabling rural revitalization: An innovative study of intangible cultural heritage in animation-based inheritance and dissemination. 9. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Scienceshttps://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1674
97.Mo Z, Huang G (2024) Digital preservation of intangible cultural heritage and exploration of network communication issues. Archives des Sci. https://doi.org/10.62227/as/74212
98.Codina JO (2024), May 7 How do emotions help construct our cultural identity in music festivals? Phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2024-05-emotions-cultural-identity-music-festivals.html
99.Leow F-T, Ch’ng E (2021) Analysing narrative engagement with immersive environments: Designing audience-centric experiences for cultural heritage learning. Museum Manage Curatorship 36:342–361
https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2021.1914136