Evaluation of Traffic Congestion Mitigation Techniques Using an Entropy-TOPSIS Integrated Method
DaniyalHussain1Email
ArshadJamal2Email
AsimFarooq1✉Email
MeshalAlmoshaogeh2Email
FawazAlharbi2Email
DanishFarooq4Email
1Department of Civil EngineeringSarhad UniversityPeshawar
2Department of Civil Engineering, College of EngineeringQassim University51452BuraydahSaudi Arabia
3Center of Excellence in Transportation/Railway Engineering (COETRE), Institute of Applied Sciences and TechnologyPak, Haripur-KPKAustria
4
A
COMSATS University IslamabadWah Campus
Daniyal Hussain1, Arshad Jamal2, Asim Farooq3 *, Meshal Almoshaogeh2, Fawaz Alharbi2, Danish Farooq5
Academic Editor: Firstname Lastname
Received: date
Revised: date
Accepted: date
Published: date
Citation: To be added by editorial staff during production.
Copyright: © 2025 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Affiliation 1: Department of Civil Engineering, Sarhad University, Peshawar malikdaniyal207@gmail.com
Affiliation 2: Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia, a.jamal@qu.edu.sa; m.moshaogeh@qu.edu.sa; fawazalharbi@qu.edu.sa
Affiliation 3:
Center of Excellence in Transportation/Railway Engineering (COETRE), Pak Austria Fachhochschule: Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology, Haripur-KPK, Pakistan. asimfarooq1234@gmail.com
Affiliation 5: COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus danish.farooq@ciitwah.edu.pk
* Correspondence 1: m.moshaogeh@qu.edu.sa
Correspondence 2: asimfarooq1234@gmail.com
A
Abstract
Road traffic congestion is a major issue in many developing countries, including Pakistan. In Pakistan, roads now handle 96% of freight, replacing rail as the main transport mode. This study uses ArcGIS's Important Zones Analysis and Multi-Criteria Analysis Techniques to determine Peshawar's important routes. The key route was identified, and congestion spots along it were further examined using passenger car unit (PCU) analysis, volume-to-capacity ratios, capacity studies, and Level of Service (LOS) calculations. An integrated strategy based on the Shannon Entropy method and the TOPSIS technique was used to rank high traffic congestion areas. Fuzzy TOPSIS analysis results revealed that Amin Hotel with closeness coefficient (Ci = 0.85) was identified as the most congested location, followed by PC and Jalil Kabab sites. The city exceeded its capacity limits, leading to the blocking of major roads during peak hours, according to the results. Main causes include BRT route infrastructure, inadequate parking, poor lane markings, incorrect police checkpoint placement, irregular road shapes, and fixed obstructions like electric poles. The most congested area was found ‘Amin Hotel Point’ (Rank-1), while other significant locations such as ‘PC Hotel’, ‘Army Stadium’, and ‘Jalil Kabab House’ were ranked 2–4. Study’s findings can serve as benchmark for ranking and targeted traffic interventions and policy measures for mitigating congestion in other developing urban contexts.
Keywords:
Traffic Congestions
Sustainable Urban Mobility
Multi-Criteria Analysis Techniques
Passenger Car Unit
Shannon Entropy
TOPSIS
1. Introduction
Traffic congestion is a significant problem in urban areas globally, leading to increased travel time, higher fuel consumption, and elevated levels of pollution [1]. The presence of large vehicles and increased transport activity on the urban roads contribute significantly to traffic congestion [2]. Pakistan has the highest proportion of compact automobiles in the world, which contributes to traffic congestion [3]. Traffic safety difficulties in Pakistan may be attributed to increased traffic, a lack of planning, reckless driving behavior, no traffic separation, speeding, ignorance of traffic regulations, poor vehicle condition, terrible road conditions, and a large number of motorcycles on the road [4, 5]. Over 96% of freight transport in Pakistan has shifted from rail to road, exacerbating the issue of road traffic congestion [6]. This shift has resulted in escalating logistics costs, putting additional pressure on the economy [7].
Numerous studies have found several factors that involve traffic congestion. According to Smith et al. (2017) [8], inadequate road infrastructure with the occurrence of conflicting traffic flows and deficient signalization can increase congestion [9]. Ineffective road operations and high traffic demand also trigger traffic congestion [10]. Population increase, land-use alignments, and deviations in travel demand have also been detected as critical concerns affecting traffic congestion [11]. Previous research studied the traffic issues along the corridor which contain less than positive traffic movement, and an adverse level of delays along with the environmental conditions inferred by noise and emissions produced from the vehicles [12]. Another case study revealed numerous problems encountered in the analysis of congestion in application. The significance of using demand flow data under congested conditions and the result of queue spillback in reducing saturation flow rates were assessed [13].
The study focuses on Peshawar, one of the country's most polluted and traffic-congested cities [14]. Peshawar, the capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), is experiencing rapid population growth as people migrate from various regions for education and employment opportunities. This population influx, coupled with inadequate infrastructure and poor traffic management, has led to severe traffic congestion in the city [15]. The population of Peshawar in 2024 is estimated to be 2,481,000, which shows a 2.86% increase in population from 2023 [16]. Traffic management in Peshawar is a major concern in the province [17]. Certain locations in Peshawar experience particularly high levels of congestion, leading to significant delays and negatively impacting air quality [18].
In the past, numerous research studies have been carried out around the world to identify the various reasons for traffic congestion [19]. Basri Said & Syafey, (2021) [20] Studies the parking issues, Khanorkar et al., (2014) [21] identifies the impacts of Lane width of road, Fadare & Ayantoyinbo, (2010) [22] studies the effects of traffic congestion on freight movement, [23] findings the impact of BRT service on traffic congestion etc. In the lack of sufficient data, neither road operators nor travelers can measure how acutely the road system is functioned [10]. Assessing traffic congestion levels using social media data can provide valuable insights into these levels, and this method shows potential for real-time monitoring and management of congestion [24].
GIS technologies are increasing in popularity for transportation planning because they allow for the visualization, analysis, and optimization of geographical data, allowing policymakers to build integrated public transportation networks [25]. In London, for example, GIS has been critical to the development of the Oyster Card system, which analyses passenger movement patterns to optimize routes and timetables, providing fair accessibility [26]. Similarly, Singapore's transport network, which includes buses, trains, and even pedestrian walkways, uses GIS to offer real-time traffic updates, reducing interruptions and delays [27]. These worldwide results demonstrate GIS' revolutionary potential in tackling urban transportation difficulties, particularly in densely populated places where multimodal integration is critical to reduce reliance on private automobiles [28].
Despite numerous traffic flow and signal timing studies in Pakistani cities, GIS based Important Zones Analysis has not been used to rank congestion on Peshawar’s arterial routes. This study aims to identify and analyze traffic congestion along the primary route in Peshawar using Important Zones Analysis in ArcGIS. After identifying congestion hotspots on this route, detailed traffic studies, speed studies, capacity analysis, Level of Service (LOS) calculations, and questionnaire surveys were conducted to assess the primary factors contributing to congestion. This research also proposes effective remedial measures to reduce traffic congestion. The findings offer practical traffic management strategies for Peshawar and a replicable framework for similar urban settings.
The method is considered one of the novel and attractive approaches in order to evaluate the traffic-related issues in the developing countries' economies, such as transportation capacity and infrastructure effectiveness [39], transit system operation performance [40], and to select transportation modes and routes [41].
Unlike previous studies that examined traffic congestion in Pakistani cities using conventional statistical or simulation-based methods, this study introduces a novel integration of the Shannon Entropy and TOPSIS techniques within a GIS-based Important Zones Analysis framework to evaluate and rank urban congestion hotspots. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first study in Pakistan to combine multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) with spatial analysis for congestion assessment. The proposed integrated approach not only quantifies congestion severity but also provides a replicable model that can guide data-driven urban mobility planning in other developing cities.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study area description
The research paper is based on a work of identification, evaluation and providing solutions for traffic congestion issues present on the urban roads of Peshawar city, as presented in Fig. 1. For this purpose, Important Zones Analysis is done by using ArcGIS, in which important zones of Peshawar are identified based on the weights of factors such as built-up areas, educational facilities, health facilities, markets, roads, banks, tourism spots, etc.
This study focuses on identifying the primary causes of traffic congestion during peak hours along the selected 16 km corridor in Peshawar. In addition to the four major congestion hotspots, several other locations within the city experience similar traffic issues during busy periods. The contributing factors were identified through a combination of field observations, on-site traffic surveys, and expert consultations conducted during different time intervals. These efforts helped capture variations in congestion patterns under diverse traffic and environmental conditions. The key causes of congestion, their impacts on traffic flow, supporting field evidence, and corresponding mitigation measures are summarized in Table 1. Furthermore, Fig. 1 illustrates typical traffic scenarios observed across Peshawar that contribute to recurring congestion and traffic jams.
Table 1
Causes, impacts, and mitigation measures of traffic congestion in Peshawar
Cause
Impact on Traffic Flow
Supporting Evidence / Observation
Suggested Mitigation Measure
Frequency (%)
BRT corridor narrowing near stations
Reduced lane width and bottleneck formation, particularly during peak hours [29]
Field observations at Saddar and University Road show lane widths reduced to below 9 ft near BRT stations
Improve lane geometry, provide clear markings, and regulate parking around stations
85
Poor road surface and drainage conditions
Vehicle slowdown and lateral movement due to potholes and water accumulation
Observed along multiple sections during rainy conditions causing intermittent stoppages
Regular maintenance and surface rehabilitation; upgrade drainage facilities
80
Insufficient designated parking spaces
Vehicles occupy traffic lanes, reducing effective capacity
Noted near Amin Hotel and PC Hotel during business hours
Develop off-street parking and implement strict no-parking enforcement
78
Commercial and institutional activity concentration
High vehicle and pedestrian interaction leading to recurrent congestion
Heavy inflow observed near markets, hospitals, and universities along the 16 km corridor
Introduce time-based restrictions, pedestrian crossings, and coordinated signals
73
Absence of lane markings and signage
Disorganized movement, unsafe overtaking, and reduced throughput
Identified at Army Stadium and Jalil Kabab House intersections
Apply reflective markings, lane dividers, and modern traffic control devices
70
Improper location of police checkpoints
Artificial bottlenecks and queue build-ups during inspections
Queue formation observed near PC Hotel and University Road in peak periods
Relocate checkpoints to service lanes or wider sections
65
Encroachment and roadside vendors
Reduced carriageway width and obstruction of traffic flow
Noted at Gulbahar and Firdous areas
Implement strict anti-encroachment measures and provide alternative vending zones
60
Weak enforcement and poor driver discipline
Frequent violations, lane changing, and wrong-side driving
Reported by survey respondents and supported by traffic police feedback
Strengthen enforcement, awareness programs, and use automated monitoring
72
Fig. 1
Traffic scenarios of the city leading towards Traffic Congestion and Jams
Click here to Correct
The greater advantages of GIS go beyond operational savings. GIS systems may promote equitable transportation planning by merging demographic data and real-time analytics, ensuring that all population segments, including women, children, and the elderly, have access to safe and efficient public transportation [30]. Furthermore, the environmental impact of GIS-based transportation systems is significant. By optimizing routes and timetables, such systems cut fuel consumption and emissions, in line with Pakistan's international commitments, such as the Paris Agreement. The creation of an integrated transport network also promotes the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), notably SDG 11, which aims to make cities more inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable [31].
2.2. GIS-Based Congestion Mapping Workflow
The steps for conducting the Important Zones Analysis are given below:
Fig. 2
Workflow diagram for the area selection
Click here to Correct
Stage – 1: Base Data Preparation
This database is developed by Manually Digitizing. Banks data was used as a proxy to identify Markets. In addition, road network of motorway and highway is developed and corrected using the National Highway Authority, Road Asset Management Section classified Road Network Map, referring to the workflow diagram, given at Fig. 2.
Stage – 2: Euclidean Distance Raster Development
This indicates the space that exists from one certain distance to another distance, which has a color, and so on until a maximum distance is indicated or we have the raster predefined.
Stage – 3: Distance Raster Re-Classification
This is used to reclassify the raster using a user-defined classification system. In this analysis, we used 5 classification systems.
1 = Very high
2 = High
3 = Moderate
4 = Low
5 = Very Low
Stage – 4: MCA Overlay Weights Applied
Multi Criteria Analysis allows researchers to systematically compare different criteria by assigning weights to each one based on its importance. In this process, factors like proximity to important zones e.g., educational facilities, markets, roads, and built-up areas etc. are ranked and weighed by their impact on traffic congestion. Using these weights, MCA overlays them in a GIS, creating a map that highlights high-priority areas for congestion management. These weights are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
MCA Overlay Weights Applied
Multi Criteria Overlay Weights
Ranks
Criteria
Weights
1
Build Up Areas
35
2
Educational Facilities
20
3
Roads
15
4
Health Facilities
10
5
Markets
10
6
Banks
5
7
Tourism Spots
5
Stage – 5: MCA Overlay Weights Resultant Raster
Figure 3 represents the Final Priority Raster, which was generated by using the Weighted Overlay (Spatial Analyst) tool in the ArcMap environment. The tool Overlays several raster’s using a common measurement scale and weights each according to its importance.
Fig. 3
Important Zones of Peshawar Map (Map generated by using ArcMap version 10.8 (Esri, https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcmap/overview))
Click here to Correct
2.3. Identifying Congestion Hotspots
Following the identification of a critical route within the high-priority traffic zone of Peshawar, specific congestion hotspots along this route were identified using a combination of practical observation and digital analysis. Field observations were conducted at various times and on different days to capture fluctuations in traffic patterns and ensure reliability. Additionally, Google Maps was utilized as a tool to assess real-time and historical traffic intensity, providing a visual representation of congestion levels along the route. The study results identified four major traffic congestion hotspots by integrating these two methods. These hotspots are areas where traffic frequently slows down or comes to a standstill due to factors such as reduced road width, increased vehicle volume, inadequate signal timing, improper roadside parking, and poor road conditions. Figure 4 presents the traffic intensity map sourced from Google Maps, which highlights the most heavily congested segments of the route. Complementing this, Fig. 5 marks the specific locations of the identified congestion hotspots, offering a spatial understanding essential for targeted traffic management and infrastructure improvement strategies.
Fig. 4
Traffic Intensity Map from Google Maps (Map data: ©2024 Google, Imagery ©2024 CNES / Airbus, Maxar Technologies.)
Click here to Correct
A stretch of approximately 16 kilometers starting from Bab-e-Peshawar to Hajji-Camp bus station is selected (as shown in Fig. 5) because most of the traffic congestions related problems takes place here on daily basis, the road being crowded during the working hours of the day and also it is the busiest route of the provincial capital.
Fig. 5
Traffic Congestion Hotspots (Map generated by using ArcMap version 10.8 (Esri, https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcmap/overview)
Click here to Correct
The methodology of research includes two stages:
A
Fig. 6
Methodology workflow chart
Click here to Correct
2.3.1. Stage 1: Evaluation of traffic congestion
Traffic congestion can be evaluated using two methods. The first method is calculating the road's volume-to-capacity ratio [32]. If the ratio exceeds 1, it indicates the road is compensating for more volume of vehicles than capacity. The second method is calculating the Passenger Car Unit (P.C.U) during peak hours and comparing it to the standards [33, 34]. In this research, both methods are applied, and the results are compared with the standards.
I.
Volume Study
The rate of flow is measured at each point throughout one week to take into consideration all different days of the week including the weekdays and weekends late night hours were neglected because traffic flow is reduced too much. The counting intervals were 15 minutes. The Performa used for Volume Study shown in Fig. 9 in the Appendix of this paper.
Fig. 9
Performa used for Volume Study
Click here to Correct
II.
Speed Study
Spot Speed Study has been done on each point by recording the times of 100 Vehicles per congestion hotspot with the help of Stopwatch for a specific distance to cover and gets the speed of the Vehicles.
III.
Passenger Car Unit (P.C.U) Analysis
According to Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000), the ideal road capacity of a multilane highway is 2,000 passenger car units per hour per lane (pcu/hr/lane) [35] (for ideal roadway and traffic conditions) (National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board., 2000). These PCU values mentioned are widely accepted for traffic studies in urban areas of developing countries, including Pakistan, due to similar traffic compositions and road conditions [36]. Table 3 presents the Passenger Car Unit (PCU) equivalent factors used for calculating PCU values for different vehicle types.
Table 3
PCU Equivalent Factors
Vehicle Type
Car
Motorcycle
Mazda Coaster
Rickshaw/Qingqi
Pickup/
Delivery Truck
Suzuki/ Wagon
2-Axle
3-Axle
4-Axle
5-Axle
6-
Axle
Large Bus
Animal Driven Cart
Bi-Cycle
Tractor
PCU Factors
1
0.5
2
0.75
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4
3
4.5
0.3
4
IV.
Volume to Capacity Ratio Analysis
The Capacity of each point will be determined by multiplying the Ideal Capacity of each Point with corresponding adjustment factors w.r.t that point. The formula for calculating the Capacity of the road is given below:
Capacity = Ci x N x Fw x Fp x Fhv (Eq. 1)
where;
N = Number of Lanes
Ci = Ideal Capacity
Fw = Adjustment Factor for Restricted Land Width and Side Adjustment
Fp = Non-Regular Driver Adjustment Factor
Fhv = Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor
V.
Interview Questionnaire on Causes and Recommendations for Traffic
As a part of this research, Data was collected through interviews with transportation experts and road users to understand the causes of traffic congestion and to discover possible solutions. The questionnaire form shown in Fig. 10 in the Appendix of this paper was developed.to gain information and support the findings from previous sections of this paper.
Fig. 10
Questionnaire Form used for Survey on identifying Traffic Congestion causes and solutions
Click here to Correct
2.3.2. Stage 2: Assessment of the considered area with Shannon Entropy Method
I.
Shannon Entropy Method
The Shannon Entropy is based on the information entropy for each criterion. It is a non-subjective method because it does not use experts’ assessment.
The weights of the criteria according the Shannon Entropy are:
(Eq. 2)
Where:
The information entropy is determined as follows [37]:
where:
is the information entropy; j is the number of criteria,
;
is the normalized values of decision matrix
; s is the number of alternatives,
.
The normalized values
are calculated as follows:
(Eq. 4)
II.
TOPSIS Method
TOPSIS is a distance based multi-criteria method, [38]. The ranking of alternatives is based on the highest performance score. For this purpose, two distances are determined - the shortest geometric distance from the positive ideal solution and farthest geometric distance from the negative ideal solution.
The performance score is calculated as follows:
; 0
(Eq. 5)
(Eq. 6)
(Eq. 8)
where:
is the Euclidean distance from the ideal best solution;
is the Euclidean distance from the ideal worst solution;
is the ideal best solution;
is the ideal worst solution;
are the normalized scores of decision matrix;
are the weights of criteria.
3. Results
3.1. Evaluation of traffic congestion at major congestion hotspots Peshawar
The traffic data collected from the four major congestion hotspots are presented in Fig. 7, while the corresponding speed profile generated using GPS-based measurements is shown in Fig. 8.
Fig. 7
Traffic count data collected from four major congestion hotspots in Peshawar
Click here to Correct
The traffic data from the four locations—Amin Hotel, PC Hotel, Army Stadium, and Jalil Kabab House indicate that motorcycles and cars are the dominant vehicle types at all sites. The morning hours, particularly between 9:00 AM and 12:00 AM, consistently experience the highest traffic volumes. Understanding these traffic patterns is essential for improving traffic management, particularly during peak hours.
Fig. 8
Speed Profile obtained through SpeedPro App (Map generated by using ArcMap version 10.8 (Esri, https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcmap/overview)
Click here to Correct
Table 4 indicates significant traffic congestion across all evaluated hotspots, as their peak hour ‘P.C.U’ values exceed the allowable limits. At Amin Hotel, Army Stadium, and Jalil Kabab House, with 3 lanes and a limit of 6,000, the peak hour ‘P.C.U’ reaches 8,650, 7,274, and 7,836, respectively. Similarly, PC Hotel, with 4 lanes and a limit of 8,000, records a peak hour ‘P.C.U’ of 8,049. These findings confirm severe congestion at all surveyed locations.
Table 4
Passenger Car Unit (P.C.U) Analysis
Passenger Car Unit (P.C.U) Analysis
Congestion
Hotspots
No. of Lanes
P.C.U Allowable Limit
(Ci = 2000 pcu/lane/hr)
AADT
Peak Hour Time
Peak Hour Volume (veh/hr)
Peak Hour P.C.U
(pcu/hr)
Congestion
Status (Yes/NO)
Amin Hotel
3
6000
42606
10:15am-11:15am
8320
8650
Yes
PC Hotel
4
8000
36991
09:45am-10:45am
7255
8049
Yes
Army Stadium
3
6000
31253
09:15am-10:15am
6155
7274
Yes
Jalil Kabab House
3
6000
32828
12:45pm-1:45pm
6735
7836
Yes
Table 5 reveals the actual road capacity after considering various adjustment factors. These adjustment parameters
,
, and
were adopted from the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM, 2000) [35]. For Amin Hotel, the capacity is 5,504, PC Hotel is 6,475, Army Stadium is 5,508 and for Jalil Kabab House have a capacity of 5,503, respectively. These values reflect the ideal capacity adjusted for factors like restricted lane width, driver behavior, and heavy vehicles. These estimates show the significance of adjusting for actual conditions in assessing road capacity.
Table 5
Capacity Analysis of Study Area
Congestion
Hotspots
No. of Lanes (L)
Ideal Capacity
(Ci = 2000 pcu/lane/hr)
Adjustment Factor for Restricted Land Width and Side Adjustment (Fw)
Non-Regular Driver Adjustment Factor (Fp)
Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (Fhv = 1/1 + PT(ET-1))
Capacity
(C = NxCixFwxFpxFhv)
Amin Hotel
3
6000
0.92
1
0.997
5504
PC Hotel
4
8000
0.8
1
0.996
6475
Army Stadium
3
6000
0.92
1
0.998
5508
Jalil Kabab House
3
6000
0.92
1
0.997
5503
3.2. Formation of the Decision Matrix
Prior to initiating the Entropy-based weighting process, a decision matrix was formulated based on raw data collected from the field across the four major congestion sites, i.e., Amin Hotel, PC Hotel, Army Stadium, and Jalil Kabab House, from the study area. Each site was evaluated using key congestion-related parameters including Service Flow Rate (SF), Peak 15-minute Passenger Car Units (P.C.U), Road Capacity, Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (V/C), Level of Service (LOS), and Congestion Status. Table 6 indicates that all identified congestion hotspots exceed the road's capacity, with V/C values indicating severe congestion. The V/C ratio is 1.65 at the Amin Hotel, 1.32 at the PC Hotel, 1.35 at the Army Stadium, and 1.50 at Jalil Kabab House. This analysis confirms that all hotspots exceed their capacity and are facing significant traffic congestion. Values for these parameters are summarized in Table 6, representing the unweighted input data that formed the foundation for the Entropy normalization and subsequent TOPSIS ranking. These unweighted parameters were subsequently normalized by employing the Shannon Entropy method to determine the objective weights for each parameter, ensuring that the subsequent TOPSIS analysis was both data-driven and unbiased.
Table 6
Decision matrix before employing entropy weighting
Congestion
Hotspots
P.C.U
(Peak 15min)
Service Flow Rate
(SF = P.C.U(Peak15min)x4)
Capacity of Road
V/C= (SF/Capacity of Road)
Level of Service
Congestion
Status (Yes/No)
Amin Hotel
2271
9083
5504
1.65
F
Yes
PC Hotel
2143
8573
6475
1.32
F
Yes
Army Stadium
1856
7424
5508
1.35
F
Yes
Jalil Kabab House
2067
8268
5503
1.50
F
Yes
3.3. Assessment of the area investigated in Peshawar.
Based on the evaluation of traffic congestion of Peshawar, the following criteria have been determined to assess the area of congestion:
Max Capacity of road;
Service flow rate (SF);
Volume to the capacity ratio (V/C);
Total traffic;
Passenger Car Unit (P.C.U.) peak hour
Table 7 presents the decision matrix, where four major traffic points in Peshawar—Amin Hotel, PC Hotel, Army Stadium, and Jalil Kabab House—are evaluated against five criteria: maximum capacity of the road, saturation flow (SF), volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio, total traffic, and Passenger Car Units (P.C.U.) during peak hours. Among these, Amin Hotel exhibits the highest V/C ratio of 1.65 and the highest peak hour P.C.U., indicating significant congestion. In contrast, Army Stadium shows relatively lower traffic volume and better capacity utilization.
Table 7
Decision matrix for the considered parameters using Shannon entropy method
Point
Criterion
Max Capacity of Road
SF
V/C
Total traffic
P.C.U. peak hour
Amin Hotel
5504
9083
1.65
42606
8650
PC Hotel
6475
8573
1.32
36991
8049
Army Stadium
5508
7424
1.35
31253
7274
Jalil Kabab House
5503
8268
1.5
32828
7836
Table 8 represents the results of weights calculated by using Shannon entropy method. According to the results, ‘total traffic’ and the ‘V/C’ ratio emerge as the most influential criteria, with weights of 0.40 and 0.22 respectively, while the maximum capacity of the road and SF both hold moderate importance (0.14), and P.C.U. peak hour contributes the least (0.10).
Table 8
Shannon entropy weights distribution for the considered parameters
Shannon Entropy
Criterion
Max Capacity of Road
SF
V/C
Total traffic
P.C.U. peak hour
0.998
0.998
0.997
0.995
0.999
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.005
0.001
0.14
0.14
0.22
0.40
0.10
Table 9 shows the results of TOPSIS method. The ranking indicates that the area with the biggest traffic congestion of Peshawar is ‘Amin hotel’. To assess the robustness of ranking, Table 9 shows the results for the positive (D⁺) and negative (D⁻) ideal distances, the closeness coefficient (Ci), and the resulting ranks for each congestion hotspot. The results underscores, how variations in criterion weights affect the TOPSIS scores and rankings, allowing for more precise assessment of stability and sensitivity of congestion ranking. This quantitative approach allows for a more precise assessment of the stability and sensitivity of the congestion ranking outcomes. Using these weights, Table 9 applies the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method to rank the investigated points. Amin Hotel ranks first with the highest closeness coefficient (Ci = 0.85), confirming it as the most congested location. It is followed by PC Hotel, Jalil Kabab House, and Army Stadium, in descending order of congestion severity.
Table 9
TOPSIS Ranking
Point
Rank
Amin Hotel
0.01
0.07
0.85
1
PC Hotel
0.04
0.04
0.47
2
Army Stadium
0.07
0.00
0.03
4
Jalil Kabab House
0.06
0.02
0.24
3
3.4. Sensitivity Analysis Implementation
To assess the robustness of Entropy–TOPSIS results, sensitivity analysis was conducted computationally by systematically varying each criterion’s Entropy-derived weight by ± 10% while keeping the total weight normalized. For individual adjusted scenario, the rankings and TOPSIS closeness coefficients were recalculated and verified. Subsequently, changes in ranking order were used to identify the most influential criteria. Results showed that variations in the ‘maximum road capacity’ weight in particular significantly influenced the ranking outcomes, signifying its strong influence on the overall evaluation as shown in Table 10.
Changing the weights of the remaining criteria does not affect the results. To assess the stability of these rankings, a sensitivity analysis was conducted. Conversely, altering the weights of the remaining criteria—SF, V/C, total traffic, and P.C.U. peak hour—does not impact the ranking, indicating the robustness of the analysis and highlighting the critical role of road capacity in urban traffic congestion.
Table 10
Sensitivity analysis of weights
Criterion
From
To
Max Capacity of road
0
0.37
SF
0
1
V/C
0
1
Total traffic
0
1
P.C.U. peak hour
0
1
4. Discussion
The study was undertaken in different steps to evaluate traffic congestion at specified locations. Accordingly, the traffic data from the four locations—Amin Hotel, PC Hotel, Army Stadium, and Jalil Kabab House indicate that motorcycles and cars are the dominant vehicle types at all sites. The morning hours, particularly between 9:00 AM and 12:00 AM, consistently experience the highest traffic volumes. All identified congestion hotspots exceed the road's capacity, with V/C values indicating severe congestion. The V/C ratio is 1.65 at the Amin Hotel, 1.32 at the PC Hotel, 1.35 at the Army Stadium, and 1.50 at Jalil Kabab House. Among these, Amin Hotel exhibits the highest V/C ratio of 1.65 and the highest peak hour P.C.U., indicating significant congestion. In contrast, Army Stadium shows relatively lower traffic volume and better capacity utilization. The Shannon entropy method evaluated the weights of the specified criteria. According to the results, total traffic and the V/C ratio emerge as the most influential criteria, with weights of 0.40 and 0.22 respectively, while the maximum capacity of the road and SF both hold moderate importance (0.14), and P.C.U. and peak hour contributes the least (0.10). The TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method was utilized to rank the investigated points. Amin Hotel ranks first with the highest closeness coefficient (Ci = 0.85), confirming it as the most congested location. It is followed by PC Hotel, Jalil Kabab House, and Army Stadium, in descending order of congestion severity. To assess the stability of these rankings, a sensitivity analysis was conducted. These results reveal that the criterion "maximum capacity of road" has the greatest influence on the ranking outcome, with any changes in its weight significantly affecting the results. Conversely, altering the weights of the remaining criteria—SF, V/C, total traffic, and P.C.U. peak hour—does not impact the ranking, indicating the robustness of the analysis and highlighting the critical role of road capacity in urban traffic congestion. Previous study applied the Shannon Entropy and TOPSIS approaches in Karachi to rank congestion locations, highlighting that total traffic volume and V/C ratio are the most significant factors in assessing urban traffic effectiveness [42]. Rehman and Qureshi (2020) examined congestion formations in Lahore and evaluated that intersections near commercial zones undergo excessive delays and unstable flow appearances, with road capacity being the maximum sensitive element inducing congestion severity [43].
A multifaceted strategy is needed to solve Peshawar's traffic congestion issue at its core. First and foremost, it is imperative that current traffic laws be enforced more strictly and that new rules that are suited to the demands of modern cities be created. Examples of such regulations include limiting the use of rickshaws on specific city routes and allocating distinct lanes for various vehicle types. Additionally, traffic police and media organizations should actively contribute to cultivating traffic awareness among the public. The physical condition of roadways also demands attention; regular maintenance, including patching and properly constructed manholes, is essential to ensure uninterrupted traffic flow. Adequate parking facilities must be developed at designated locations to prevent random roadside parking, thus allowing roads to be used to their full capacity. Furthermore, electric poles should be installed at a safe distance from roadways to prevent obstruction. Proper road surface markings and the installation of traffic control devices and signals at key points are crucial for regulating traffic flow. In areas where traffic volume exceeds the road's capacity, road stoppers should be installed and traffic diverted to nearby intersections. Additionally, police check posts should be relocated to more appropriate sites to minimize disruption. Finally, where feasible, the width of road lanes should be expanded to at least 12 feet to better accommodate vehicular movement. Based on expected outcomes of the suggested measures it is predicted that the V/C ratio at the designated congested locations could reduce by approximately 15–25%, possibly getting the Amin Hotel Corridor’s V/C ratio down from 1.65 to around 1.25–1.40 under optimized conditions. The applied method can be utilized to other Pakistani cities, as similar traffic situations and infrastructural problems exist. By optimizing routes and timetables, the process can effectively decrease fuel consumption and emissions, aligning with Pakistan’s international environmental commitments such as the Paris Agreement [31].
Future work will employ simulation-based tools such as SUMO or VISSIM to model these interventions more accurately and provide detailed projections of V/C improvements and delay reductions. Moreover, the study suggests to apply advanced naturalistic data collection tools, such as GPS-based tracking, AI-driven monitoring systems, and sensor networks to expand deeper understandings into driver behavior and effectively solve recurring congestion issues.
5. Conclusions and future work
This study demonstrated that integrating entropy-TOPSIS with GIS hotspot mapping can objectively rank congestion severity in data-scarce contexts. The study identified and analyzed traffic congestion in Peshawar city, through field surveys, speed studies, volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio analysis, and Passenger Car Unit (PCU) calculations. To identify the significant route in Peshawar, the Important Zones Analysis using ArcGIS, including the Multi-Criteria Analysis Techniques were utilized. The areas of traffic congestion were ranked by applying an integrated approach based on Shannon entropy method and TOPSIS method. It was found that the most important criteria are total traffic and volume to the capacity ratio. The ranking indicates that the area with the biggest traffic congestion of Peshawar is ‘Amin hotel’. The results revealed that all surveyed locations exceed their capacity limits, causing traffic congestion during the peak hours. High ranked factors which are contributing to traffic congestion are Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service, inadequate parking facilities, poor lane delineation, and the inefficient placement of police checkpoints. Additionally, irregular road geometry, obstructions like electric poles, and unregulated traffic movements further worsen the congestion issues. To address these issues, the study recommends enforcing stricter traffic regulations, improving parking management, enhancing road surface markings, and optimizing traffic signal timings. Infrastructure improvements, such as increasing lane widths where feasible and relocating police checkpoints to less disruptive areas. Implementing these measures helps in improving the traffic flow, reducing delays and enhancing the mobility in Peshawar city. The Study considered the primary traffic data, but the study didn’t focus on the temporal traffic variations, and driver behavior patterns.
The study, however, has few limitations, such as the controlled sample size and less number of corridors, which may not entirely characterize the city’s complete traffic conditions. To further extend the study’s scope, further corridors from several parts of the city should be studied to assess diverse traffic patterns, thereby improving the applicability and consequence of the results. Further recommendations for future work include utilizing advanced traffic simulation and analysis tools such as SUMO or VISSIM to perform a comparative evaluation of the collected data. These tools can enhance the understanding of traffic dynamics, optimize flow management, and provide more accurate predictions for congestion mitigation. Additionally, by expanding the research to other urban corridors and integrating real-time traffic data, the outcomes can be made more comprehensive and applicable to city-wide traffic management planning, considering more efficient mobility strategies and decreased socio-economic costs.
A
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article **.**
A
Acknowledgement
We thank the whole team, for their dedicted work.
A
Funding
The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Qassim University for financial support (QU-APC-2025).
Author Contribution declaration
Contribution: Conceptualization D. H, A.F Methodology D. H, A.F, A.J investigation A.F, M. A data curation D.F, D.H validation F.A formal analysis D.H, A. F writing—original draft preparation A.F, D.H writing—review and editing.
Competing Interest:
“The authors declare no conflicts of interest.”
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material
A
Author Contribution
Contribution: Conceptualization D. H, A.F Methodology D. H, A.F, A.J investigation A.F, M. A data curation D.F, D.H validation F.A formal analysis D.H, A. F writing—original draft preparation A.F, D.H writing—review and editing.
References
1.
Shamsher, R., Abdullah, M. N., Abdullah, N. & Mohamamd, &, & Traffic Congestion in Bangladesh-Causes and Solutions: A study of Chittagong Metropolitan City. Asian Bus. Rev. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v2i1.116 (2020). 2.
2.
Fattah, M. A., Morshed, S. R., Kafy, A. & Al Insights into the socio-economic impacts of traffic congestion in the port and industrial areas of Chittagong city, Bangladesh. Transportation Engineering, 9(December 2021), 100122. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2022.100122
3.
Syed, W. H., Yasar, A., Janssens, D. & Geert Wets. Analyzing the Real Time Factors: Which Causing the Traffic Congestions and Proposing the Solution for Pakistani City. Procedia Comput. Sci. 32, 413–420 (2014).
4.
Ahmed, A., Ukkusuri, S. V., Mirza, S. R. & Hassan, A. Width-based cell transmission model for heterogeneous and undisciplined traffic streams. Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (5), 682–692 (2019).
5.
Noman, S. M., Ahmed, A. & Ali, M. S. Comparative analysis of public transport modes available in Karachi. Pakistan SN Appl. Sci. 2, 1–13 (2020).
6.
Batool, Z. Attitudes towards Road Safety and Aberrant Behaviour of Drivers in Pakistan. Electron. Physician. 7 (8), 1566–1574 (2012).
7.
The World Bank. Transport Competitiveness in Pakistan Analytical Underpinning for National Trade Corridor (World Bank [Data File], 2006).
8.
Smith, C. H., Evenson, A., Corbett, A., Kozhimannil, K. & Moscovice, I. Rural Transportation: Challenges and Opportunities (University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, 2017). https://www.ruralhealthresearch.org/publications/1144
9.
Jones, S., Tefe, M. & Appiah-Opoku, S. Incorporating stakeholder input into transport project selection – a step towards urban prosperity in developing countries? Habitat Int. 45, 20–28. 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.07.023 (2015).
10.
Kurzhanskiy, A. A. & Varaiya, P. Traffic management: An outlook. Web of Science Categories: Economics. ISSN: 2212 – 0122. (2015). 10.1016/j.ecotra.2015.03.002
11.
Li, Z., Wang, W., Wang, K. & Wang, Y. Exploring the impact of land use on traffic congestion using statistical and spatial analysis methods. Transp. Res. Part. C: Emerg. Technol. 67, 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.02.002 (2016).
12.
Ali, N. M., Ali, A., Raza, S. & Munir, R. J. Traffic Analysis: Case Study (N-5 Corridor Rawalpindi, Pakistan). Eur. Acad. Res., 3(4). (2015). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:204769333
13.
Yumlu, D., Moridpour, S. & Akcelik, R. Traffic congestion in Melbourne, Australia. A Case Study. Paper presented at the AITPM, National Conference, Adelaide, Australia. (2014). https://researchrepository.rmit.edu.au/esploro/outputs/9921859981501341
14.
Ali, Z., Akhtar, S., Shah, A. & Hussain, A. Growing Traffic in Peshawar: An Analysis of Causes and Impacts. South Asian Studies A Research. J. South. Asian Stud. 27 (2), 409–420 (2012).
15.
Umair, M. An Analysis of Peshawar (Pakistan) Traffic Issues Its Causes, Effects and A Strategic Plan to Resolve It An Analysis of Peshawar (Pakistan) Traffic Issues Its Causes, Effects and A Strategic Plan to Resolve It View project An Analysis of Peshawar (Pakista. 1–13. (2020).
16.
MacroTrends. Peshawar, Pakistan Metro Area Population 1950–2020. (2024). https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/cities/22051/peshawar/population#:~:text=The current metro area population,a 3.08%25 increase from 2021.
17.
Shahan, S. et al. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OF WARSAK ROAD PESHAWAR PAKISTAN. In International Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Management (Vol. 02, Issue 03). (2013).
18.
Javed, R. THE ADVERSE IMPACT OF INCREASING TRANSPORTATION ON POPULATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE HISTORIC PESHAWAR CITY. Technology 5 (3123), 548–554 (2011).
19.
Vipin Jain. Road Traffic Congestion in the Developing World (ACM Digital Library, 2013).
20.
Basri Said, L. & Syafey, I. The scenario of reducing congestion and resolving parking issues in Makassar City, Indonesia. Case Stud. Transp. Policy. 9 (4), 1849–1859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.10.004 (2021).
21.
Khanorkar, A. R., Ghodmare, S. D. & Khode, B. V. Impact of Lane Width of Road on Passenger Car Unit Capacity under Mix Traffic Condition in Cities on Congested Highways. In Journal of Engineering Research and Applicationswww.ijera.com (Vol. 4, Issue 5). (2014). www.ijera.com
22.
Fadare, S. O. & Ayantoyinbo, B. B. A Study of the Effects of Road Traffic Congestion on Freight Movement in Lagos Metropolis. In European Journal of Social Sciences (Vol. 16, Issue 3). (2010).
23.
Patankar, V. M., Kumar, R. & Tiwari, G. (n.d.). Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit Lanes on Traffic and Commuter Mobility. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE0733-94882007133:299
24.
Liu, Y., Feng, X., Wang, Q., Zhang, H. & Wang, X. Prediction of Urban Road Congestion Using a Bayesian Network Approach. Procedia - Social Behav. Sci. 138, 671–678. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.259 (2014).
25.
Bekhor, S., Ben-Akiva, M. E. & Ramming, M. S. ‘Evaluation of choice set generation algorithms for route choice models’, Annals of Operations Research, 144(1), pp. 235–247. (2006). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10479-006-0009-8
26.
Rodrigue, J. P., Comtois, C. & Slack, B. The Geography of Transport Systems 5th edn (Routledge, 2020).
27.
Zhixiang Fang, X., Zong, Q., Li, Q. & Li, S. Xiong ‘Hierarchical multi-objective evacuation routing in stadium using ant colony optimization approach’, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(3), pp. 443–451. (2011). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.10.001
28.
Singh, S. & Behera, S. N. ‘Development of GIS-Based Optimization Method for Selection of Transportation Routes in Municipal Solid Waste Management’, Advances in Waste Management, pp. 319–331. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0215-2_22
29.
Farooq, A. An Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate. (2021b).
30.
Ralston, B. A. ‘GIS and ITS traffic assignment: Issues in dynamic user-optimal assignments’, GeoInformatica, 4(2), pp. 231–243. (2000). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009884408801/METRICS
31.
Chadha, C. & Garg, S. ‘Shortest Path Analysis on Geospatial Data Using PgRouting’, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 55, pp. 201–214. (2019). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2324-9_20
32.
KHANNA, S. K. Highway Engineering. (2011).
33.
Sharma, M. Estimation of Passenger Car Unit on urban roads: A literature review. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 10 (3), 283–298. 10.1088/1755 – 1315/796/1/012025 (2021).
34.
Bomzon, U. et al. June. Determination of PCU Values for Mixed Traffic Conditions Along the Hilly Road of East Sikkim. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 796, no. 1, p. 012025. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/796/1/012025
35.
National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. (2000). Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
36.
Raj, J. Estimation of PCU Values for Urban Roads by Considering the Effect of Signalized Intersections under Mixed Traffic Conditions. Eur. Transport/Trasporti Europei (2022).
37.
Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, a State-of-the-Art Survey (Springer, 1981).
38.
Hwang, C. L., Lai, Y. J. & Liu, T. Y. A New Approach for Multiple Objective Decision Making. Comput. Oper. Res. 20, 889–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V (1993).
39.
Ali, M. & Zhang, Y. Assessment of transportation infrastructure and capacity issues in developing economies using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Transp. Policy. 80, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/tranpol.2019.01.005 (2019).
40.
Hassan, K., Javed, S. & Malik, N. Evaluating public transit system performance using MCDM approaches in developing urban regions. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, 1–12. (2020). https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jat.2020.00215
41.
Nguyen, T. & Lee, C. Multi-criteria analysis for transportation mode and route selection under developing economy constraints. Transp. Res. Procedia. 52, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/trpro.2021.052245 (2021).
42.
Rehman, M. & Qureshi, T. Analyzing traffic congestion and delay patterns in urban corridors of Lahore. Pakistan. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 27 (1), 78–88 (2020).
43.
Kumar, V., Singh, A. & Sharma, R. Assessment of intersection congestion and capacity analysis in Delhi using volume-to-capacity ratio. Int. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 10 (2), 45–56 (2021).
APPENDIX
Abstract
Road traffic congestion is a major issue in many developing countries, including Pakistan. In Pakistan, roads now handle 96% of freight, replacing rail as the main transport mode. This study uses ArcGIS's Important Zones Analysis and Multi-Criteria Analysis Techniques to determine Peshawar's important routes. The key route was identified, and congestion spots along it were further examined using passenger car unit (PCU) analysis, volume-to-capacity ratios, capacity studies, and Level of Service (LOS) calculations. An integrated strategy based on the Shannon Entropy method and the TOPSIS technique was used to rank high traffic congestion areas. Fuzzy TOPSIS analysis results revealed that Amin Hotel with closeness coefficient (Cᵢ = 0.85) was identified as the most congested location, followed by PC and Jalil Kabab sites. The city exceeded its capacity limits, leading to the blocking of major roads during peak hours, according to the results. Main causes include BRT route infrastructure, inadequate parking, poor lane markings, incorrect police checkpoint placement, irregular road shapes, and fixed obstructions like electric poles. The most congested area was found ‘Amin Hotel Point’ (Rank-1), while other significant locations such as ‘PC Hotel’, ‘Army Stadium’, and ‘Jalil Kabab House’ were ranked 2-4. Study’s findings can serve as benchmark for ranking and targeted traffic interventions and policy measures for mitigating congestion in other developing urban contexts.
Total words in MS: 5571
Total words in Title: 11
Total words in Abstract: 216
Total Keyword count: 6
Total Images in MS: 10
Total Tables in MS: 11
Total Reference count: 43