Comparison of aerosol optical depth between the CALIPSO and the MODIS over the Sichuan Basin
Title
Authors
Chengyu Hu 1,2
Hwee San Lim 1✉ Email
1 School of Physics Universiti Sains Malaysia 11800 Penang Malaysia
2 Sichuan Water Conservancy Vocational College 611231 Chengdu China
Chengyu Hu1,2, Hwee San Lim1 *
Affiliations
1 School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia. 2Sichuan Water Conservancy Vocational College, 611231 Chengdu, China.
*Address correspondence to: hslim@usm.my
Abstract
CALIPSO, the first satellite capable of vertical atmospheric profiling, has revolutionized atmospheric research by providing unprecedented vertical resolution of aerosol distributions. In contrast, the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), a widely used passive remote sensing instrument, has demonstrated high reliability in aerosol detection. This study harmonizes the spatial resolution and temporal coverage of CALIPSO and MODIS Level 2 aerosol products over the Sichuan Basin, China, for the period 2007–2022. A detailed statistical comparison was conducted across annual, seasonal, monthly, and regional scales. Results indicate a consistent temporal trend in Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) between the two datasets. Nonetheless, notable discrepancies persist, with larger differences observed in winter and spring, and smaller deviations in summer and autumn. Approximately 60% of the absolute AOD differences fall within the range of 0 to 0.2, indicating general agreement. MODIS exhibits greater sensitivity across the AOD span, particularly in regions of extreme values—tending to overestimate AOD in high-concentration areas, while CALIPSO reports higher values in low-concentration regions.
Keywords:
Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD)
CALIPSO
MODIS
Remote Sensing Comparison
Sichuan Basin
1. Introduction
Aerosols play a critical role in shaping atmospheric environmental conditions, and their spatiotemporal distribution is a key focus of atmospheric studies. Satellite-based remote sensing has become an indispensable tool for monitoring aerosols on a global scale. Broadly, aerosol remote sensing techniques can be divided into passive and active approaches. Passive sensors, such as those aboard the Terra and Aqua satellites carrying the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), primarily rely on solar radiation to retrieve aerosol properties and provide wide horizontal coverage. However, they lack the capability to resolve vertical aerosol profiles(McMurry 2000; Yu et al. 2010). In contrast, active remote sensing instruments, like the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO), utilize lidar systems to acquire vertical atmospheric profiles. CALIPSO, equipped with the dual-channel Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP), has significantly enhanced our understanding of the vertical structure of aerosols.
While both MODIS and CALIPSO are capable of global aerosol observation, they offer complementary strengths: MODIS excels in spatial coverage and horizontal resolution, whereas CALIPSO provides detailed vertical distribution data. Extensive research has compared aerosol products from these platforms (Asl et al. 2019; Kim et al. 2013). For instance, Redemann et al. (2012) and Kittaka et al. ༈2011༉ investigated global discrepancies in Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) retrievals, while Ma et al.༈2013༉ and Liu et al. ༈2018༉ examined regional differences under dust and air pollution conditions in China. These studies consistently reveal substantial AOD differences between the two datasets under varying atmospheric and environmental settings. However, the underlying causes of these discrepancies remain complex and insufficiently characterized, particularly in regions with unique topographic and meteorological conditions.
Topography is a key factor influencing aerosol distribution and satellite retrieval accuracy. The Sichuan Basin, one of the most representative topographic basins in China, presents a distinct environment for aerosol research due to its enclosed terrain and complex pollution sources. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive comparison of AOD products from MODIS and CALIPSO over the Sichuan Basin, focusing on their temporal, seasonal, and spatial variations. By exploring the differences in AOD retrievals within this basin environment, we seek to provide insights for data selection, uncertainty assessment, and methodological optimization in future aerosol studies in complex terrains.
2. Methodology
2.1 Study area
The Sichuan Basin (Fig. 1), situated in southwestern China, ranks among the country’s four major basins, spanning an area exceeding 260,000 km². Bordered by the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Daba Mountains, Huaying Mountains, and Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, the region exhibits a dramatic topographic gradient, with elevations ranging from 50 meters in low-lying areas to over 5,000 meters in peripheral highlands. The basin experiences a subtropical monsoon climate characterized by distinct thermal gradients: higher temperatures prevail in the eastern and southern sectors, with elevated thermal zones concentrated at the basin’s core and cooler conditions along its margins, resulting in concentric isothermal patterns. Seasonal temperature averages range from 24 ~ 28°C in summer to 4 ~ 8°C in winter. Annual precipitation totals 1,000 ~ 1,300 mm, with pronounced intra-annual variability—70 ~ 75% of rainfall occurs during the summer monsoon season (June–October) (Li et al. 2021; L. Zhang et al. 2019).
The basin hosts 17 major urban centers, including the megacities of Chengdu and Chongqing, each with populations surpassing 20 million. Cities in the southwestern sector exhibit particularly high population density and industrial activity. Rapid socioeconomic development in recent decades has coincided with frequent large-scale aerosol pollution events. Chengdu, the provincial capital, consistently ranks among China’s most air-polluted cities, with PM2.5 concentrations chronically exceeding WHO air quality guidelines. Air quality degradation remains a pressing concern across the basin’s urban centers, as documented in recent studies(Fang et al. 2021; Ning et al. 2018).
Fig. 1
DEM rendering of the Sichuan Basin
Click here to Correct
2.2 Data and method
CALIPSO was the first satellite capable of monitoring the vertical distribution of clouds and aerosols(Hu et al. 2024). It provides global aerosol horizontal distribution characteristics, vertical profiles, and can automatically identify aerosol types(Hunt et al. 2009; Vaughan et al. 2004; Winker et al. 2009). The CALIPSO satellite is equipped with three instruments: a dual-wavelength (532nm, 1064nm) orthogonally polarized cloud-aerosol lidar (CALIOP), an Imaging Infrared Radiometer (IIR), and a Wide Field Camera (WFC) (Kou et al. 2023; Winker et al. 2007). The CALIOP lidar can collect remote sensing data both during the day and at night, with a revisit time of 16 days. After NASA processes the data, five levels of data products are available: Level 0, Level 1A, Level 1B, Level 2, and Level 3. This study primarily uses the Level 2 5km layer product, which provides 532nm aerosol optical depth information, capturing cloud and aerosol detection data over a 5km horizontal grid(Kim et al. 2018; Young et al. 2018). CALIPSO was officially launched in 2006 and served for nearly 17 years before being decommissioned in 2023.
MODIS, mounted on the Terra and Aqua satellites, is a key instrument in NASA's Earth Observing System (EOS) program for observing global biological and physical processes(Levy et al. 2013; Y. Zhang et al. 2024). MODIS features 36 spectral bands with moderate resolutions ranging from 0.25µm to 1µm, enabling observations of the Earth's surface every 1 to 2 days(Remer et al. 2005). It captures images of land and ocean temperatures, primary productivity, land surface cover, clouds, aerosols, water vapor, and fire events(Habib et al. 2019; Tripathi et al. 2005). In this study, we used MOD/MYD04_3K (MODIS Terra/Aqua Aerosol 5-Min L2 Swath 3km), a NASA Level 2 550nm aerosol product that provides global atmospheric aerosol optical properties (e.g., optical thickness and size distribution) and mass concentration over ocean and land environments. The product uses a lookup table (LUT) to retrieve reflectance and transmission fluxes, along with other quality control and auxiliary parameters, with a spatial resolution of 3 km.
This study utilized all CALIPSO level products during its operational period, covering a total of 16 years from 2007 to 2022 (data from 2006 and 2023 were excluded as they only cover half a year). Similarly, MODIS aerosol product data from the same 16 years were used. Since MODIS remote sensing data is limited to daytime, only daytime CALIPSO data were utilized. Due to differences in spatial resolution between CALIPSO and MODIS aerosol products, the first step was to resample the data. To ensure sufficient spatial coverage for analyzing the entire Sichuan Basin, a 1°×1° geographic grid was selected for nearest-neighbor resampling, and the data range was uniformly matched to 102°~110°E, 27°~33°N. The second step involved calculating annual, monthly, and seasonal averages, followed by analyzing annual and monthly changes in AOD across the entire basin and conducting probability distribution statistics. Scatter plots were then created by matching each grid's monthly average data from the Sichuan Basin with CALIPSO and MODIS monthly averages, followed by linear regression analysis. To further analyze the discrepancies, the differences between the corresponding monthly and seasonal averages of the two datasets were calculated, and the absolute differences were subjected to probability statistics and linear regression. Finally, the regional distribution of annual averages, seasonal averages, and seasonal discrepancies in AOD between the two datasets were visualized to more intuitively reflect distribution differences.
3. Results
3.1 AOD statistical comparison between CALIPSO and MODIS over the Sichuan Basin
The annual average AOD values for the Sichuan Basin were calculated and linearly fitted, resulting in a trend graph of yearly average AOD values from 2007 to 2022 (Fig. 2). Overall, the AOD values from both MODIS and CALIPSO show a continuous decline. MODIS AOD values dropped from 0.53 in 2007 to 0.3 in 2022, while CALIPSO values decreased from 0.4 to 0.34. The AOD values of MODIS and CALIPSO converged in 2014. Before 2014, MODIS values were higher than CALIPSO's, but the trend reversed after 2014. The linear fit results indicate that the rate of decline in MODIS AOD is greater than that of CALIPSO AOD. The CALIPSO AOD values appear to follow a three-year cycle during the decline, where after three consecutive years of decrease, a rebound occurs. However, the overall trend remains downward.
A
Fig. 2
Trend of annual mean AOD values over the Sichuan Basin from 2007 to 2022.
Click here to Correct
A
Fig. 2
The blue dashed line is the linearly fitted trend of MODIS AOD values, the orange dashed line is the linearly fitted trend of CALIPSO AOD values.
Figure 3 shows the monthly average AOD values for the Sichuan Basin, with seasonal boundaries indicated by green dashed lines. The MODIS line shows a pattern of "high AOD in winter and spring, low in summer and autumn" in the Sichuan Basin. The peak value appears in March (0.52), and the lowest value in November (0.33). Conversely, the CALIPSO line follows a pattern of "high AOD in summer and autumn, low in winter and spring," with a peak in August (0.45) and a low in December (0.32). MODIS AOD values are higher than CALIPSO's in winter and spring, remaining above 0.4 from January to May, while CALIPSO values stay between 0.35 and 0.4. The largest difference, 0.15, occurs in March during the spring. After June, MODIS AOD values fall below CALIPSO's. Both show a similar trend in summer and autumn, with a rise after July, peaking in August, and then declining to a low at the end of the year. To further compare seasonal differences between MODIS and CALIPSO, we performed a statistical analysis of AOD in the Sichuan Basin at a sampling resolution of 1°×1°. This yielded scatter plots of MODIS and CALIPSO AOD (Fig. 4), which were then linearly fitted. The R² values for the linear fits in spring, summer, autumn, and winter are 0.14, 0.12, 0.12, and 0.27, respectively. This indicates that the overall correlation between MODIS and CALIPSO AOD values is weak, with the correlation being better in winter than in other seasons. Although the correlation is weak, some patterns can still be observed. The slopes of the linear fits are 0.7, 0.58, 0.44, and 0.68, all less than 1, indicating that as CALIPSO AOD values increase, MODIS tends to underestimate them. The intercepts are 0.22, 0.16, 0.19, and 0.16, all greater than 0 and around 0.2, suggesting the presence of systematic errors between CALIPSO and MODIS. These errors likely arise from sensors and algorithms. When AOD values are low, MODIS values tend to be higher than CALIPSO's.
A
Fig. 3
The green dashed line is the seasonal demarcation line.
A
A
Fig. 4
(a) ~ (d) indicate the four seasons of spring (MAM), summer (JJA), fall (SON), and winter (DJF), respectively. The orange solid line is the linear fit line and the gray dashed line is the 1:1 reference line.
Figure 5 shows the frequency distribution of all AOD pixels, revealing that the AOD values in the Sichuan Basin are mainly distributed below 0.8. In the ranges of 0.1–0.2 and above 0.6, MODIS has a higher frequency distribution than CALIPSO, indicating that MODIS is more sensitive to both low and high values compared to CALIPSO. Conversely, CALIPSO's AOD values are more prominently distributed in the 0.2–0.6 range, suggesting that MODIS performs better in extreme weather conditions than CALIPSO.
Fig. 3
Monthly mean values of AOD over the Sichuan Basin.
Click here to Correct
Fig. 4
Scatter plot of AOD for CALIPSO and MODIS.
Click here to Correct
A
Fig. 5
Frequency distribution of AOD values in the study area
Click here to Correct
Figure 6 shows the absolute value of the difference between CALIPSO and MODIS AOD. In Fig. 6a, a scatter plot of CALIPSO AOD against the absolute deviation is presented, with a linear fit resulting in an R² of 0.007. The correlation is very weak, and the slope is nearly zero, indicating that the magnitude of AOD has little relationship with the difference between CALIPSO and MODIS. Figure 6b presents the frequency distribution of the absolute deviations, with over 60% of the deviations falling within the 0-0.2 range. The larger the deviation, the less frequently it occurs, indicating that the AOD deviation between CALIPSO and MODIS is relatively stable, with most differences being less than 0.2.
Fig. 6
Absolute deviation between CALIPSO and MODIS.
Click here to Correct
A
Fig. 6
(a) Scatterplot of absolute deviation; (b) numerical frequency distribution statistics of absolute deviation
3.2 AOD regional comparison of CALIPSO and MODIS over the Sichuan Basin
A
Figure 7 shows the spatial distribution of average AOD in the Sichuan Basin from 2007 to 2022, with city coordinates and boundaries marked on the map. Figure 7a shows the spatiotemporal distribution of CALIPSO AOD. High AOD values are concentrated in southwestern urban areas, with the highest value of 0.63 in Leshan City, followed by Zigong, Neijiang, and Yibin, where AOD values range from 0.5 to 0.6. In the western basin, due to the high altitude of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, AOD ranges from 0.2 to 0.3. In the eastern mountainous areas, AOD increases to around 0.3 to 0.4 due to altitude and population density. Figure 7b shows the spatiotemporal distribution of MODIS AOD. In high-value areas, MODIS AOD is higher than CALIPSO, with maximum values near Leshan and Meishan approaching 0.9. Zigong, Neijiang, and Yibin have values around 0.7 to 0.8, while Deyang and Mianyang also exhibit high values around 0.8. In low-value areas, MODIS AOD is lower than CALIPSO, with AOD in the western plateau generally below 0.2. Overall, the spatial distribution patterns of CALIPSO and MODIS are generally consistent, showing a trend of "high AOD in the basin's interior, low on the periphery; higher values in the western urban areas compared to the eastern, and lower values in the western mountains compared to the eastern."
Fig. 7
Spatial distribution of mean AOD in Sichuan Basin from 2007 to 2022.
Click here to Correct
A
Fig. 7
Green circles are city coordinates and black solid lines are city boundaries. (a) CALIPSO; (b) MODIS.
A
A
The spatiotemporal distribution of AOD was analyzed in two-year intervals from 2007 to 2022. Figure 8 shows the spatiotemporal distribution of CALIPSO AOD. It can be observed that before 2018, there were some gaps in the Sichuan Basin due to the satellite's orbital path. This issue was improved after the satellite's orbit was lowered in 2018. High AOD values in the basin appeared in the Yibin area from 2007 to 2008 and in the Leshan area from 2013 to 2014, both approaching 0.8. Figure 9 shows the spatiotemporal distribution of MODIS AOD, with the highest values observed in 2011–2012. The AOD in the western urban clusters of the basin, including Meishan, Deyang, Mianyang, Zigong, and Leshan, were all close to 1.2. Starting from 2015, there was a significant decline in AOD values within the basin, with noticeable improvement in the western urban clusters.
Fig. 8
Spatial and temporal distribution of CALIPSO mean AOD values in the Sichuan Basin, 2007–2022, two-year intervals.
Click here to Correct
A
Fig. 9
Spatial and temporal distribution of MODIS mean AOD values in the Sichuan Basin, 2007–2022, two-year intervals.
Click here to Correct
Fig. 10
Seasonal spatial-temporal distribution of mean AOD values in the Sichuan Basin.
Click here to Correct
Figure 10 shows the seasonal spatiotemporal distribution of AOD in the Sichuan Basin. For CALIPSO AOD, high values in spring are mainly concentrated in Zigong, Yibin, and Leshan, ranging from 0.6 to 0.7. In the northeastern Basin cities, AOD ranges from 0.4 to 0.5. In summer, AOD across the basin generally increases to between 0.5 and 0.6. In autumn, most AOD values in the basin remain around 0.5 to 0.6, with AOD increasing in the southwestern cities while beginning to decrease in the surrounding mountainous areas. In winter, overall AOD is higher than in other seasons, with AOD in the western urban clusters mostly exceeding 0.6. Looking at the seasonal distribution of MODIS AOD, it is noteworthy that spring AOD values in the basin are significantly higher than in other seasons, with the highest values in the western urban areas approaching 1. This is not as evident in CALIPSO's seasonal distribution. In summer, AOD decreases compared to spring, and further declines in autumn, especially around the periphery of the basin. In winter, MODIS AOD in the western cities of the basin is also relatively high, with Zigong, Neijiang, and Meishan reaching around 0.9.
A
Fig. 11
Seasonal deviation regional distribution of AOD
Click here to Correct
A
Fig. 10
(a)-(d) are CALIPSO maps; (e)-(f) are MODIS maps.
To further analyze the differences between MODIS and CALIPSO AOD, we calculated the AOD difference based on the seasonal spatiotemporal distribution and created a plot (Fig. 11). The bias in the figure is calculated by subtracting CALIPSO AOD from MODIS AOD. The figure shows that the difference between the two is quite significant in spring, with the maximum bias reaching 0.8 in the Meishan and Chengdu areas. In other urban areas, the difference is also above 0.2. In summer, the bias improves considerably compared to spring, with deviations of about 0.3–0.4 in areas such as Deyang, Mianyang, western Chengdu, and Chongqing. In autumn, the bias is smaller, with urban areas showing deviations below 0.2. In winter, except for parts of Meishan and western Chengdu where the bias is around 0.4, the deviations in other urban areas are not particularly large. Additionally, we found that the bias in the plateau and mountainous areas surrounding the basin tends to be negative, indicating that CALIPSO tends to overestimate in low-value regions.
4. Discussion
In summary, there are significant differences in AOD between CALIPSO and MODIS within the Sichuan Basin in certain aspects, though some degree of consistency exists as well. Analyzing the sources of these differences requires extensive data collection on influencing factors and detailed correlation analysis(Kim et al. 2013; Wu and Ma 2020; Zeng et al. 2017; Huang et al. 2013). Due to data limitations, we are unable to conduct an in-depth analysis of the reasons behind these differences. However, we can still draw some conclusions to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of both systems in AOD measurement.
In terms of the annual trend of AOD, MODIS and CALIPSO show consistency, which has been validated in many studies(Liu et al. 2018, 2018; Ma et al. 2013; Tripathi et al. 2005). Both can be effectively used for long-term regional AOD monitoring. Regarding seasonal deviations, the two systems exhibit better consistency with smaller differences in the summer and autumn, but larger deviations occur in winter and spring. These deviations may stem from various factors. Many studies have shown that under cloudy conditions, the edge scattering of clouds can cause significant errors in passive remote sensing(Holz et al. 2008; Levy et al. 2013; Remer et al. 2005). This implies that MODIS may overestimate AOD compared to CALIPSO in cloudy conditions(Kittaka et al. 2011). Given that the Sichuan Basin experiences high cloud cover during deep winter, this could affect the measurement deviations between MODIS and CALIPSO[6]. Similarly, frequent cloudy weather reduces the number of effective observation days for CALIPSO, diluting the data sampling for winter and spring, resulting in lower AOD values during these seasons(Hu et al. 2009; Meng 2018). Therefore, when selecting data for winter and spring, additional validation conditions should be incorporated to ensure that the data more accurately reflect the actual situation.
The scatter plot fitting results for the four seasons show a relatively low correlation (with low R² values) between CALIPSO and MODIS, but it can still be observed that in low AOD environments, MODIS values are generally about 0.2 higher than those of CALIPSO. MODIS tends to be more sensitive in detecting both high and low values compared to CALIPSO. This systematic bias is also evident in previous studies by Zhao et al.(2022) and Ma et al.(2013), and is more intuitively reflected in the frequency distribution of absolute AOD deviations (Fig. 6).
The overall distribution pattern of AOD in the Sichuan Basin is characterized by "higher values inside the basin and lower values around it; higher AOD in the western urban clusters compared to the eastern urban clusters, and lower values in the western mountainous areas compared to the eastern mountainous areas." This pattern aligns with the unique topography of the region, surrounded by high mountains, which hinders air circulation and makes it difficult for pollutants to disperse. The western urban clusters within the basin are predominantly industrial cities with significant industrial emissions, severely impacting air quality. In contrast, the eastern part of the basin, including the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau and the Daba Mountains, has a lower elevation compared to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and relatively higher levels of human activity. In recent years, with increasing attention to air quality, there has been a noticeable improvement in the AOD distribution within the basin, with a significant reduction in AOD in urban areas, This result is consistent with numerous atmospheric studies in the Sichuan Basin(Zhang et al. 2016; Wang et al., 2022; Ai and Chen, 2019; Zhao et al., 2022). However, the southwest urban cluster, with Chengdu and Chongqing as the dual cores, remains the main contributor to AOD.
Regarding the regional differences between MODIS and CALIPSO, we found that in high-AOD regions, MODIS tends to overestimate compared to CALIPSO, while in low-AOD regions, CALIPSO tends to produce higher values than MODIS. This may be related to their respective spatial resolutions, as MODIS's larger spatial coverage allows it to more clearly express both high and low values.
5. Conclusion
This study conducted a comparative analysis of 16 years (2006–2022) of CALIPSO Level 2 AOD data and MODIS Level 2 MOD/MYD04_3K products over the Sichuan Basin. The results demonstrate a broadly consistent temporal trend in AOD between the two datasets; however, notable seasonal and spatial discrepancies exist. Specifically, AOD differences are more prominent in winter and spring, with the maximum monthly deviation reaching 0.15 in March, while differences during summer and autumn are less significant.
Seasonal correlation analysis indicates a relatively weak linear relationship between MODIS and CALIPSO AOD, with all seasonal regression slopes below 0.7 and low R² values (ranging from 0.12 to 0.27). MODIS exhibits higher sensitivity to both low (0.1–0.2) and high (> 0.6) AOD values, contributing to over 60% of the absolute differences falling within 0–0.2. These findings suggest that although both datasets reflect similar overall patterns, MODIS tends to capture broader AOD variations than CALIPSO.
Spatially, AOD concentrations are generally higher in the basin's interior and lower along the periphery. Western urban clusters show elevated AOD levels compared to eastern counterparts, while mountainous areas exhibit the opposite pattern. The southwestern urban agglomeration, centered around Chengdu and Chongqing, represents the primary AOD hotspot in the region. Regional biases between the two datasets are most evident in areas with extreme values—MODIS overestimates AOD in high-value zones, whereas CALIPSO exceeds MODIS in low-value regions.
These findings highlight the importance of integrating both passive and active remote sensing data to improve the accuracy of aerosol monitoring. Future research could explore fusion methods or correction models that leverage the complementary strengths of CALIPSO and MODIS in characterizing aerosol distribution across complex terrains like the Sichuan Basin.
Limitations and future works
Although this study extensively discussed the differences in AOD between MODIS and CALIPSO over the Sichuan Basin, there are still some limitations. The study provided only inferential and referential analyses of the differences between the two datasets without conducting further experiments to validate the underlying driving causes of these differences. This will be the focus of future research.
A
Acknowledgement
Appreciation to NASA and the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiale (CNES) for the construction and maintenance of the CALIPSO satellite and for the public release of the data.
A
Funding
This study was conducted with financial support from FRGS grant. Authors acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) for funding under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) (Reference Code: FRGS/1/2021/STG08/USM/02/2).
A
Author Contribution
C.H: Conceptualisation, writing-original draft preparation, investigation, and methodology.HS.L: Supervision, writing-review & editing, and validation.
HS.L: Supervision, writing-review & editing, and validation.
Declarations
Ethics approval:
All ethical standards have been followed during this research.
Consent to participate:
Not applicable.
Consent to publish:
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest:
The authors declare no competing interest.
A
A
Data Availability
The CALIPSO data presented in this article are publicly available in NASA Langley ASDC at http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov. MODIS data are sourced from NASA EARTHDATA at https://earthdata.nasa.gov/.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material
References
Ai Z, Chen QL (2019) Temporal and spatial distribution of aerosol optical depth in Sichuan and its correlation with meteorological factors. Sichuan Environment 38:79–86.
A
Bencherif H, Bounhir A, Bègue N, et al (2022) Aerosol distributions and Sahara dust transport in southern Morocco, from ground-based and satellite observations. Remote Sensing 14:2454. https://doi.org/10/gqg86n
Chen A, Zhao C, Fan T (2022) Spatio-temporal distribution of aerosol direct radiative forcing over mid-latitude regions in the Northern Hemisphere estimated from satellite observations. Atmospheric Research 266:105938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105938
Chen L-X, Zhang B, Zhu W-Q, et al (2009) Variation of atmospheric aerosol optical depth and its relationship with climate change in China east of 100° E over the last 50 years. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 96:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-008-0023-7
Chukwuka AV, Ogbeide O, Otomo PV (2023) Trend relationship between mountain normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and aerosol optical depth (AOD) across two decades: implication for water quality within the Lesotho Highlands, Drakensberg, South Africa. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 195:584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11110-2
Collaud-Coen M, Andrews E, Aliaga D, et al (2018) Identification of topographic features influencing aerosol observations at high-altitude stations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18:12289–12313. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12289-2018
Das S, Das S, Das S, et al (2017) Biomass burning aerosol transport and vertical distribution over the South African-Atlantic region. Journal of Geophysical Research 122:6391–6415. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026421
de Leeuw G, Kang H, Fan C, et al (2023) Meteorological and anthropogenic contributions to changes in the aerosol optical depth (AOD) over China during the last decade. Atmospheric Environment 301:119676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119676
Fang C, Tan X, Zhong Y, Wang J (2021) Research on the temporal and spatial characteristics of air pollutants in the Sichuan Basin. Atmosphere 12:1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12111504
A
Filip L, Stefan S (2011) Study of the correlation between the near-ground PM10 mass concentration and the aerosol optical depth. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 73:1883–1889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.04.027
Gao Y, Liu Z, Wang J (2018) Correlation analysis of PM2.5 concentration and MODIS aerosol optical depth in Urumqi City. Arid Land Geography 41:298–305.
Green M, Kondragunta S, Ciren P, Xu C (2009) Comparison of GOES and MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) to AERONET AOD and IMPROVE PM2.5 mass at Bondville, Illinois. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 59:1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1082
A
Grgurić S, Križan J, Gašparac G, et al (2014) Relationship between MODIS-based aerosol optical depth and PM10 over Croatia. Central European Journal of Geosciences 6:2–16. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13533-012-0135-6
He Q, Gu Y, Zhang M (2019) Spatiotemporal patterns of aerosol optical depth throughout China from 2003 to 2016. Science of the Total Environment 653:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.307
Jia W, Wang M, Wang Z (2019) Influence factors analysis of geological disasters in southeastern Tibet based on geographical detector. In: IGARSS 2019–2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pp 3483–3486
Jin Q, Crippa P, Pryor SC (2020) Spatial characteristics and temporal evolution of the relationship between PM2.5 and aerosol optical depth over the eastern USA during 2003–2017. Atmospheric Environment 239:117718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117718
A
Kaufman YJ, Tanré D, Boucher O (2002) A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system. Nature 419:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01091
A
Khor WY, Hee WS, Tan F, et al (2014) Comparison of aerosol optical depth (AOD) derived from AERONET sunphotometer and lidar system. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 20:012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/20/1/012058
Kittaka C, Winker D, Winker DM, et al (2011) Intercomparison of column aerosol optical depths from CALIPSO and MODIS-Aqua. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 4:131–141. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-131-2011
A
Kumar S, Siingh D, Singh RP, Singh AK (2016) The influence of meteorological parameters and atmospheric pollutants on lightning, rainfall, and normalized difference vegetation index in the Indo-Gangetic Plain. International Journal of Remote Sensing (no page numbers)
Li X, Hussain SA, Sobri S, Md Said MS (2021) Overviewing the air quality models on air pollution in Sichuan Basin, China. Chemosphere 271:129502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129502
A
Liao T, Gui K, Li Y, et al (2021) Seasonal distribution and vertical structure of different types of aerosols in southwest China observed from CALIOP. Atmospheric Environment 246:118145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118145
Liu B, Ma Y, Gong W, et al (2018) Comparison of AOD from CALIPSO, MODIS, and sun photometer under different conditions over Central China. Scientific Reports 8:10066. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28417-7
A
Liu X, Chen Q, Che H, et al (2016) Spatial distribution and temporal variation of aerosol optical depth in the Sichuan Basin, China, over the recent ten years. Atmospheric Environment 147:434–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.008
A
Lv B, Hu Y, Chang HH, et al (2016) Improving the accuracy of daily PM2.5 distributions derived from the fusion of ground-level measurements with aerosol optical depth observations, a case study in North China. Environmental Science & Technology 50:4752–4759. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05940
Lv B, Hu Y, Chang HH, et al (2017) Daily estimation of ground-level PM2.5 concentrations at 4 km resolution over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei by fusing MODIS AOD and ground observations. Science of the Total Environment 580:235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.049
Ma X, Ding Y, Shi H, et al (2022) Spatiotemporal variations in aerosol optical depth and associated risks for populations in the arid region of Central Asia. Science of the Total Environment 816:151558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151558
Maghrabi AH, Almutayri MM, Aldosary AF, et al (2019) The influence of atmospheric water content, temperature, and aerosol optical depth on downward longwave radiation in arid conditions. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 138:1375–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02903-y
Mancinelli E, Passerini G, Virgili S, Rizza U (2024) Multi-decadal trends in aerosol optical depth of the main aerosol species based on MERRA-2 reanalysis: A case study in the Baltic Sea Basin. Remote Sensing 16:2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132421
Mulcahy JP, O’Dowd CD, Jennings SG, Ceburnis D (2008) Significant enhancement of aerosol optical depth in marine air under high wind conditions. Geophysical Research Letters 35:. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034303
Park SS, Kim S-W, Song C-K, et al (2020) Spatio-temporal variability of aerosol optical depth, total ozone and NO2 over East Asia: Strategy for validation of the GEMS scientific products. Remote Sensing 12:2256. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142256
A
Ramachandran S, Kedia S, Srivastava R (2012) Aerosol optical depth trends over different regions of India. Atmospheric Environment 49:338–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.017
Redemann J, Vaughan MA, Zhang Q, et al (2012) Comparison of MODIS-Aqua (C5) and CALIOP (V2 & V3) aerosol optical depth. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 12:3025–3043. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3025-2012
A
Schwartz CS, Liu Z, Lin H-C, McKeen SA (2012) Simultaneous three-dimensional variational assimilation of surface fine particulate matter and MODIS aerosol optical depth. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117:. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017383
A
Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (2016) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. John Wiley & Sons
Shi Y, Chen Y, Wang J, et al (2020) Spatio-temporal characteristics and correlation of MODIS aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in Xiamen. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics 15:334–346. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2020.05.002
A
Smirnov A, Holben BN, Eck TF, et al (2003) Effect of wind speed on columnar aerosol optical properties at Midway Island. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 108:. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003879
Tsai T-C, Jeng Y-J, Chu DA, et al (2011) Analysis of the relationship between MODIS aerosol optical depth and particulate matter from 2006 to 2008. Atmospheric Environment 45:4777–4788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.006
Toth TD, Zhang J, Campbell JR, et al (2013) Investigating enhanced Aqua MODIS aerosol optical depth retrievals over the mid- to high-latitude Southern Oceans through intercomparison with co-located CALIOP, MAN, and AERONET data sets. Journal of Geophysical Research 118:4700–4714. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50311
van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Park RJ (2006) Estimating ground-level PM2.5 using aerosol optical depth determined from satellite remote sensing. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 111:. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006996
van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Brauer M, et al (2010) Global estimates of ambient fine particulate matter concentrations from satellite-based aerosol optical depth: development and application. Environmental Health Perspectives 118:847–855. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901623
A
Wang H, Qin F, Xu C, et al (2021) Evaluating the suitability of urban development land with a Geodetector. Ecological Indicators 123:107339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107339
Wang J, Li X, Christakos G, et al (2010) Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun region, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24:107–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802443457
Wang A, Kang P, Zhang Y, et al (2022) Spatial differentiation and driving factors of aerosol optical depth in the Sichuan Basin from 2003 to 2018. China Environmental Science 42:528–538. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20211012.009
Wei J, Li Z, Cribb M, et al (2020) Improved 1 km resolution PM2.5 estimates across China using enhanced space–time extremely randomized trees. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20:3273–3289. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3273-2020
Yang Q, Yuan Q, Yue L, et al (2019) The relationships between PM2.5 and aerosol optical depth (AOD) in mainland China: about and behind the spatio-temporal variations. Environmental Pollution 248:526–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.071
Yang Z, Zdanski C, Farkas D, et al (2020) Evaluation of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and PM2.5 associations for air quality assessment. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 20:100396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100396
A
Yap XQ, Hashim M (2013) A robust calibration approach for PM10 prediction from MODIS aerosol optical depth. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13:3517–3526. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3517-2013
A
Ye Z, Hu Y, Luo S, et al (2021) Analysis on the distribution pattern and differentiation mechanism of rural poverty by combining random forest and geographical detector. Anhui Agricultural Science 49:248–256
A
You W, Zang Z, Zhang L, et al (2016) A nonlinear model for estimating ground-level PM10 concentration in Xi’an using MODIS aerosol optical depth retrieval. Atmospheric Research 168:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.09.008
A
Yu H, Cui W, He Z, et al (2025) Soil moisture loss in planted forests and its driving factors: a case study of the Nanpan River Basin. Forests 16:665. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16040665
Yu H, Liu D, Zhang C, et al (2023) Research on spatial–temporal characteristics and driving factors of urban development intensity for Pearl River Delta region based on Geodetector. Land 12:1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091673
Yuan J, Wang X, Feng Z, et al (2023) Spatiotemporal variations of aerosol optical depth and the spatial heterogeneity relationship of potential factors based on the multi-scale geographically weighted regression model in Chinese national-level urban agglomerations. Remote Sensing 15:4613. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15184613
Zhang F (2024) Factors influencing the spatio-temporal variability of aerosol optical depth over the arid region of northwest China. Atmosphere 15:54. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15010054
Zhang J, Lu X, Hong J, Meng C (2016) Quantitative study on spatio-temporal patterns and driving factors of aerosols in Sichuan Province from 2000 to 2014. Journal of Natural Resources 31:1514–1525
Zhang L, Guo X, Zhao T, et al (2019) A modelling study of the terrain effects on haze pollution in the Sichuan Basin. Atmospheric Environment 196:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.007
A
Zhang Y, Li Z (2013) Estimation of PM2.5 from fine-mode aerosol optical depth. Journal of Remote Sensing 17:929–943
Zhao C, Liu Z, Wang Q, et al (2019) High-resolution daily AOD estimated to full coverage using the random forest model approach in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Atmospheric Environment 203:70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.01.045
Zhao D, Xin J, Gong C, et al (2018) Trends of aerosol optical properties over the heavy industrial zone of northeastern Asia in the past decade (2004–2015). Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0260.1
Zhao L, Li F, Wang L, et al (2024) Inversion and variation analysis of aerosol optical depth in China using a random forest model. Earth and Environment
Zheng Y, Wang X, Zhang X, Hu G (2022) Multi-spatiotemporal patterns of aerosol optical depth and influencing factors during 2000–2020 from two spatial perspectives: the entire Yellow River Basin region and its urban agglomerations. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 106:102643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102643
Zhu L, Meng J, Zhu L (2020) Applying Geodetector to disentangle the contributions of natural and anthropogenic factors to NDVI variations in the middle reaches of the Heihe River Basin. Ecological Indicators 117:106545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106545
Total words in MS: 4003
Total words in Title: 15
Total words in Abstract: 162
Total Keyword count: 5
Total Images in MS: 11
Total Tables in MS: 0
Total Reference count: 62