{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Supplementary Material -1"],"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Supplementary Material -1","index":0,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":29,"rows_kept":17,"merged":[[0,1,0,28],[1,1,1,3],[1,4,1,8],[1,9,1,13],[1,14,1,18],[1,19,1,23],[1,24,1,28]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"Part I: Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018"]
[null,"Screening questions\n(for all types)",null,null,"1. Qualitative",{"$nulls":4},"2. Quantitative\nrandomized controlled\ntrials",{"$nulls":4},"3. Quantitative non randomized",{"$nulls":4},"4. Quantitative\ndescriptive",{"$nulls":4},"5. Mixed methods"]
["Title","S1. Are there clear research questions?","S2. Do the collected data allow to address the research questions?","Further appraisal may not be feasible or appropriate when the answer is ‘No’ or ‘Can’t tell’ to one or both screening questions.","1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question?","1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question?","1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data?","1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data?","1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation?","2.1. Is randomization appropriately performed?","2.2. Are the groups comparable at baseline?","2.3. Are there complete outcome data?","2.4. Are outcome assessors blinded to the intervention provided?","2.5 Did the participants adhere to the assigned intervention?","3.1. Are the participants representative of the target population?","3.2. Are measurements appropriate regarding both the outcome and intervention (or exposure)?","3.3. Are there complete outcome data?","3.4. Are the confounders accounted for in the design and analysis?","3.5. During the study period, is the intervention administered (or exposure occurred) as intended?","4.1. Is the sampling strategy relevant to address the research question?","4.2. Is the sample representative of the target population?","4.3. Are the measurements appropriate?","4.4. Is the risk of nonresponse bias low?","4.5. Is the statistical analysis appropriate to answer the research question?","5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question?","5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question?","5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted?","5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed?","5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved?"]
["Compassion Focused Approaches to Working With Distressing Voices","Yes","N/A"]
["Shame, social deprivation, and the quality of the voice-hearing relationship.","Yes","Yes",{"$nulls":16},"Yes","No","Yes","No","Yes"]
["The ice in voices: Understanding negative content in auditory-verbal hallucinations.","Yes","Yes ","(Review, N/A for the other questions)"]
["On shame and voice-hearing.","Yes","Yes",null,"Yes","Yes","No","No","Can't tell"]
["Affective and cognitive factors associated with hallucination proneness in the general population: the role of shame and trauma-related intrusions.","Yes","Yes",{"$nulls":16},"Yes","No","Yes","No","Yes"]
["Is Shame Hallucinogenic?","Yes","No"]
["Stigma and need for care in individuals who hear voices","Yes","Yes ","(Review, N/A for the other questions)"]
["Hallucinations in Healthy Older Adults: An Overview of the Literature and Perspectives for Future Research","Yes","Yes ","(Review, N/A for the other questions)"]
["Auditory hallucinations, top-down processing and language perception: a general population study","Yes","Yes",{"$nulls":16},"Yes","No","Yes","No","Yes"]
["Perspectives on the Delirium Experience and Its Burden: Common Themes Among Older Patients, Their Family Caregivers, and Nurses","Yes","Yes",null,"Yes","Yes","Yes","Yes","Yes"]
["A comparison of hallucinatory experiences and their appraisals in those with\nand without mental illness","Yes","Yes",{"$nulls":11},"Yes","Yes","No","No","Can't tell"]
[]
[]
["Supplementary Material -1: Criteria for quality assessment and study evaluation table"]