{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Osteodensitometrie (DXA) - Stru"],"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Osteodensitometrie (DXA) - Stru","index":0,"n_rows":5,"n_cols":23,"rows_kept":5,"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
["Status","Radiology experience (for residents: work experience, for medical students: electives and clerkships)","Experience with reporting bone density measurements prior to the study \n(lumbar spine AND femur measurements of one patient are counted as 1)","I was satisfied with the introduction. Please further explain your choice.","Do you have suggestions for improvement? If yes, which ones?","I was satisfied with the introduction.\n(1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree)","I am satisfied with the quality of the structured reports I generated as part of this study.\n(1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree)","I am satisfied with the quality of the free-text reports I generated as part of this study.\n(1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree)","With respect to training the evaluation of bone density measurements, I would prefer the usage of a structured reporting template over free-text reporting.\n(1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree)","With respect to bone density measurements, do you prefer free-text reporting or structured reporting? \nPlease explain your choice.","Did you have any experience with structured reporting prior to this study?","What sort of structured reports were you familiar with so far? [text blocks]","What sort of structured reports were you familiar with so far? [bullet points]","What sort of structured reports were you familiar with so far? [decision tree with automatic generation of report text]","What sort of structured reports were you familiar with so far? [Other]","Please describe in what way you have had experience with structured reporting previously.","I consider the following to be advantages of structured reporting over free-text reporting:","I consider the following to be disadvantages of structured reporting compared to free-text reporting:","I consider the following to be advantages of free-text reporting over structured reporting:","I consider the following to be disadvantages of free-text reporting compared to structured reporting:","Optional: In which examinations would you prefer structured reporting over free-text reporting?","Optional: In which examinations would you prefer free-text reporting over structured reporting?","Optional: Other comments"]
["Radiology resident",40,"25 - 50","yes (the intense introduction and the 6 sample cases helped to remove ambiguity)","Additional text element allowing to specifiy that the previous and current bone density are identical (currently only decrease/increase).\nOften there are different numbers of preexaminations of the femur and lumbar spine - it would be helpful if you had the possibility to specify multiple dates, e.g. for the baseline.",5,5,5,5,"Free-text reporting:\nFor inexperienced people, the template for structured reporting is great; not only does it ensure that all relevant information is included, but it also allows the reader to learn what information belongs to \"findings\" and \"impression\".\nIn the daily routine, however, I find free-text reporting to be more comfortable; dictating is more fun than clicking and typing. Also, I don´t enjoy using additional programs besides PACS.","Yes","Yes","Yes","No","No",null,"Clarity for clinician\nInclusion of all relevant information\nEven inexperienced readers can generate high quality reports\nLearning effect\nTime saving","Tedious to use external programs\nLacking individuality of the reports, radiologist becomes replaceable\nVery monotonous work","Individual adaptation of the report to the patient / clinician possible\nNo additional programs required\nIs more fun\n","Lacking information, esp. when the report is generated by inexperienced examiners\nMore time-consuming\nUnclear, unstructured"]
["Radiology resident",21,"less than 25","yes (good, detailed introduction)","From time to time the program lags and has to be restarted.",5,5,3,5,"Structured reporting:\nMuch faster, no dictation errors, it is unlikely to miss important information.","Yes","Yes","No","Yes","Yes","Co-author of a cardiac MRI template by Smart Radiology","Fewer errors\nBetter wording\nClarity","The report does not show whether the reporting radiologist is competent or not, competence is feigned\nDoes not work for more complex reports","Complex findings and relations can be explained better","Many dictation errors\nVery dependent on personal competence","Bone density measurement, chest X-ray, simple orthopedic X-rays","Any complex examinations, mostly in cross-sectional imaging modalities"]
["Medical student",2,"None","no (too short for inexperienced person to create a free-text report; sufficient for someone beginning with the structured reports)","Sometimes the template is lagging due to bugs.\nAlso, it would be great if the template automatically removed the additional field for the baseline if there is no preexamination.",3,1,3,1,"Structured reporting:\nIt is very improbable to miss relevant information.\nStructured reporting leads to a time saving, leaving more time to go through the whole report at the end.\nFor an unexperienced person, it is easier to learn the structure of the report by use of the template.","No","n. a.","n. a.","n. a.","n. a.",null,"Time saving\nEasy to learn the report structureWeniger vergessene Information\nUnlikely to miss relevant information","May tempt radiologist to simply click through the report without seriously evaluate the findings","Less routinized, thus more perceived variety","Inconsistent reporting \nInformation desired by clinician is possibly not considered noteworthy by the radiologist and therefore not included\nSignificantly more time-consuming\nIn legal cases less meaningful compared to template-based report","Examinations in which the main content of the report is comprised of numbers","Particularly in special cases clearly differing from routine findings"]
["Medical student",4,"None","yes","What bothered me was that the screen jumped to another position whenever a new folder is opened up. For instance, if you start with the lumbar spine part and click on the \"+\", the screen position jumps to the bottom. On the one hand, this is inconvenient since you have to scroll back to the top. On the other hand, this \"jumping\" of the screen is unsettling. \n\nIn general, one could reduce the number of subfolders. Since the DXA always comprises the lumbar spine and the femur, the first element level is not necessary.\n\nIn addition, I want to decide myself when a folder is closed. Currently, all other folders are closed when you open one folder. Ideally, there should be another button at the end of a folder saying \"close previous folders\".\nIf the report is generated only by clicking, the clicking should be at least comfortable.",5,5,4,5,"Structured reporting:\nDXA reporting involves tedious analysis of numbers which leaves little room for interpretation.\nA template is ideal to cut down repetitive calculations and writing.","No","n. a.","n. a.","n. a.","n. a.",null,"It is less likely to forget something important\nThe template can calculate percentages automatically\nThe template guides the user through the template which is really helpful\nRoutine examinations and frequent findings can be evaluated faster","One might tend to become sloppy by just clicking through the template\nAdding free text is inconvenient","In complex examinations, free-text reporting allows to write more freely\nWhen you actively write the report by yourself, you are more attentive","More difficult for beginners to learn\nPercentages have to be calculated manually\nOne tends to forget possibly relevant findings","DXA\nChest X-ray (simple cases, such as exclusion of pneumothorax after central line placement)\nTumor staging\nFollow-up exams (e.g. multple sclerosis)","Complex neuroradiologic exams\nFractures\n"]